PORT-DE-PAIX, ÎLE DE LA TORTUE, THE NORTH-WESTERN LITTORAL, THE UPPER ARTIBONITE, AND THE WESTERN MARITIME ACCESS SYSTEM OF XARAGUA
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS AND PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
GENERAL ARCHIVES OF THE STATE
UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA
SUPREME COUNCIL FOR INDIGENOUS RIGHTS AND HISTORICAL TERRITORIES
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
ON THE INDIGENOUS TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION, PRE-COLUMBIAN POLITICAL ORDER, HISTORICAL NOMENCLATURE, AUTONOMOUS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES, MULTI-ORIGIN POPULATION FORMATION, MARITIME HISTORY, COASTAL ACCESS, ANCESTRAL SEA RIGHTS, ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION, AND PERMANENT CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS OF PORT-DE-PAIX, ÎLE DE LA TORTUE, THE NORTH-WEST, THE UPPER ARTIBONITE, AND THE WESTERN COAST OF XARAGUA
Official Reference: SCIPS-X/ORP/NW-TOR-ART-WMA/2025
Place of Promulgation: Miragoâne, Constitutional Capital of Xaragua
Promulgating Authority: Office of the Rector-President
Archival Depositary: General Archives of the State
Legal Classification: Supreme Constitutional Territorial Law — Indigenous Ancestral Jurisdiction Act — Autonomous Indigenous Communities Protection Statute — Maritime and Insular Historical Instrument — Western Coastal Access and Sea-Rights Law
Normative Rank: Entrenched Constitutional Instrument of Indigenous Territorial and Maritime Organization
Institutional Status: Permanent — Constitutionally Entrenched — Directly Applicable within Xaragua — Binding upon All Authorities, Officers, Institutions, Registers, and Jurisdictions of Xaragua
Principal Historical Territory: Port-de-Paix — Île de la Tortue — North-Western Littoral — Upper Artibonite — Associated Mountain, Riverine, Coastal, and Island Communities
Distinct Western Maritime Territory: Western Coast of Ancestral Xaragua — Bays, Coves, Anchorages, Landing Points, Maritime Corridors, Coastal Sites, and Sea-Access Zones, including the maritime approaches of the Bay of Port-au-Prince
Constitutional Function: Preservation and Exercise of the Original Indigenous Territorial Jurisdiction of Xaragua — Protection of Autonomous Indigenous Communities — Maintenance of Ancestral Coastal and Maritime Rights — Historical, Archaeological, Academic, Environmental, and Economic Administration without Direct Ordinary Government of Exogenous Civil Populations
PREAMBLE
The Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous and Private State of Xaragua,
Exercising the constituent, constitutional, Indigenous, territorial, maritime, insular, riverine, archival, academic, protective, environmental, and economic authority vested in the Office of the Rector-President;
Acting pursuant to the Constitution, foundational acts, territorial laws, maritime statutes, historical-classification instruments, and institutional regulations of Xaragua;
Recognizing that the island recorded under the Indigenous names Hayti or Ayiti, Bohío, and Quisqueya or Kiskeya possessed organized populations, political authorities, settlements, cultivated territories, fisheries, maritime routes, river systems, inter-island relations, and systems of collective obligation before European intervention;
Recognizing the North-Western region as part of the Indigenous political geography associated with Marién, the western and south-western coast as part of the ancestral territorial order associated with Xaragua, and the Upper Artibonite as an inland, riverine, agricultural, and communications interface among Marién, Maguana, Xaragua, and adjoining communities;
Recognizing Île de la Tortue as an Indigenous maritime territory whose history preceded its Spanish, English, French, and Haytian names and preceded its occupation by European hunters, settlers, sailors, merchants, engagés, boucaniers, flibustiers, privateers, pirates, company agents, and colonial authorities;
Taking institutional notice of the Indigenous government associated with Guacanagarí in Marién and of the political, commercial, maritime, kinship, and defensive relations maintained among the territories of the island and the wider northern Caribbean;
Recording the arrival of Spanish expeditions on the North-Western coast in December 1492, the imposition of European geographic names, the establishment of colonial claims, and the subsequent military, labor, religious, territorial, and demographic reorganization of the region;
Recording the effects of Spanish warfare, tribute, encomienda, compulsory labor, epidemic disease, missionary administration, land appropriation, population displacement, maritime restrictions, and the suppression or subordination of Indigenous authorities;
Taking institutional notice of the weakening of Spanish settlement in western and North-Western Hayti and the formation during the seventeenth century of a multi-origin, legally differentiated, and politically unstable society on Tortuga and the adjoining mainland;
Recognizing that this society included Indigenous survivors and descendants, Africans and African-descended persons of free, freed, enslaved, fugitive, maritime, military, artisanal, agricultural, commercial, household, and undetermined status, Europeans of free, contractual, dependent, indentured, military, maritime, captive, penal, refugee, and undetermined status, and persons of mixed Indigenous, African, and European descent;
Determining that race, color, ancestry, language, national origin, religion, occupation, legal condition, political allegiance, and degree of personal freedom constituted separate historical categories;
Recognizing that not every African or African-descended person was enslaved, that not every European was free, and that mixed families and Creole communities developed through marriage, informal union, kinship, migration, contract, commerce, military association, maritime labor, enslavement, manumission, coercion, and household incorporation;
Determining that Tortuga shall not be reduced to a pirate settlement, a European colony, a plantation appendage, or a racially binary society;
Taking institutional notice of the distinct legal positions of boucaniers, flibustiers, pirates, commissioned privateers, royal naval forces, colonial soldiers, company agents, settlers, engagés, sailors, servants, captives, enslaved persons, freed persons, fugitives, and autonomous local communities;
Taking institutional notice of Jean Le Vasseur, Fort de Rocher, Spanish counteroffensives, English and French settlements, proprietary and company interests, the government of Bertrand d’Ogeron, and the development of Port-de-Paix beginning in 1665;
Recording the consolidation of French colonial government, the development of plantation agriculture, the expansion of African enslavement, the continued existence of free and freed African-descended populations, and the formation of a differentiated local Creole society;
Recognizing the participation of Port-de-Paix, Tortuga, the North-West, and the Upper Artibonite in resistance, the Haytian Revolution, the War of Independence, the independent State of Hayti, the northern State and Kingdom of Hayti, the reunified national administration, and subsequent constitutional governments;
Recognizing that the western coast, including its bays, coves, islands, anchorages, fisheries, river outlets, and maritime approaches, formed part of the ancestral territorial and maritime system of Xaragua;
Taking institutional notice of the subsequent concentration of exogenous and post-Indigenous populations in several western coastal zones, particularly within and around the Bay of Port-au-Prince;
Determining that the demographic transformation of the western coast does not extinguish the original, sovereign, customary, ancestral, and Indigenous maritime jurisdiction of Xaragua;
Determining that Xaragua shall not directly administer the ordinary civil affairs of exogenous populations established within those areas, but shall preserve and exercise its rights through Indigenous communities, coastal sites, bays, coves, ports, landing points, navigation corridors, fisheries, maritime zones, environmental protection, investments, academic institutions, and access to the sea;
Recognizing autonomous Indigenous communities as protected collective institutions possessing their own internal social, cultural, territorial, and customary organization within the constitutional protection of Xaragua;
Determining that the autonomy of Indigenous communities does not create autonomous territorial sovereignty separate from Xaragua and does not diminish the supreme Indigenous jurisdiction of Xaragua;
Hereby adopts and promulgates the present Supreme Constitutional Law.
PART I — OBJECT, SCOPE, AND CONSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Article 1 — Object
The present Law establishes the constitutional status, historical record, institutional functions, and maritime organization of:
Port-de-Paix;
Île de la Tortue;
the North-Western littoral;
the Upper Artibonite;
the historically associated mountain, riverine, coastal, and island communities;
the western coast of ancestral Xaragua;
the bays, coves, anchorages, landing points, fisheries, and maritime corridors attached thereto.
Article 2 — Principal Indigenous Territory
Port-de-Paix, Tortuga, the North-West, and the Upper Artibonite are constituted within Xaragua as:
THE NORTH-WESTERN, TORTUGAN, AND UPPER ARTIBONITE INDIGENOUS TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.
Article 3 — Western Maritime Access System
The western coast is constituted within Xaragua as:
THE WESTERN ANCESTRAL MARITIME ACCESS SYSTEM OF XARAGUA.
It shall principally serve territorial access, navigation, fisheries, anchorage, maritime commerce, environmental protection, investment, research, and the exercise of ancestral sea rights.
Article 4 — No Autonomous Territory
Neither the principal jurisdiction nor the Western Maritime Access System is constituted as:
an autonomous territory;
an associated state;
an independent local sovereignty;
a separate constitutional order;
a competing government;
a territorial administration external to Xaragua.
Article 5 — Autonomous Indigenous Communities
Indigenous communities situated within the classified territory may possess autonomous internal institutions concerning:
community membership;
customary leadership;
cultural transmission;
local ceremonies;
community property;
fisheries practices;
environmental stewardship;
traditional knowledge;
internal consultation;
community dispute resolution.
Their autonomy shall operate under the protection, constitutional jurisdiction, and external representation of Xaragua.
Article 6 — Non-Administration of Exogenous Populations
Xaragua shall not, by this Law alone, assume direct ordinary administration over exogenous or non-incorporated civil populations residing within the classified territories.
Ordinary non-assumed functions include:
municipal civil registration;
general electoral administration;
routine policing;
ordinary public education;
ordinary public health;
municipal taxation;
ordinary civil courts;
routine residential services;
general local licensing;
daily municipal infrastructure.
Article 7 — Preservation of Jurisdiction
The absence of direct ordinary administration shall not constitute:
territorial abandonment;
extinguishment of title;
transfer of Indigenous jurisdiction;
recognition of an adverse Indigenous title;
waiver of maritime rights;
relinquishment of historical sites;
renunciation of access to the sea;
acceptance of permanent exclusion from ancestral territory.
Article 8 — Primary Fields of Xaraguayan Action
Xaragua may act through:
protection of autonomous Indigenous communities;
territorial and maritime registration;
historical and archaeological protection;
university institutions;
archives;
fisheries and coastal-resource programs;
ports and landing agreements;
investment;
tourism;
cultural restoration;
environmental protection;
maritime safety;
economic participation;
international Indigenous representation.
PART II — OFFICIAL HISTORICAL NOMENCLATURE
Article 9 — Nomenclature Register
The General Archives shall maintain a permanent Register of Indigenous, Spanish, French, English, and Haytian Territorial Names.
Each entry shall identify:
the recorded name;
language;
geographic application;
approximate period;
documentary source;
spelling variants;
established, probable, traditional, disputed, or unidentified status.
Article 10 — Indigenous Names of the Island
The forms Hayti, Ayiti, Bohío, Quisqueya, and Kiskeya, together with documented variants, shall be preserved as Indigenous names associated with the island.
Article 11 — Colonial and International Names
The following shall be recorded as subsequent designations:
La Española and Española, under Spanish usage;
Santo Domingo, under Spanish colonial usage;
Saint-Domingue, under French colonial usage;
Hispaniola, as a later international geographic form.
Xaragua shall use Hayti in its constitutional and historical instruments.
Article 12 — Marién
Marién shall be entered as the principal recorded Indigenous political-territorial name associated with the North and North-West.
Article 13 — Xaragua and Yaguana
Xaragua, Jaragua, Yaragua, and documented variants shall be preserved as names associated with the western and south-western Indigenous political system.
Yaguana shall be recorded as the principal governmental seat associated with Xaragua and present-day Léogâne.
Article 14 — Tortuga
The official register shall include:
Isla Tortuga and La Tortuga, under Spanish usage;
Île de la Tortue, under French usage;
Tortuga and Turtle Island, under English usage;
Latòti and Île de la Tortue, under Haytian usage.
No unattested Indigenous name shall be declared authentic.
Article 15 — Port-de-Paix
The official register shall include:
Port-de-Paix, as the established French form;
Pòdepè, as the Haytian Creole form;
Spanish names attributed to the bay or surrounding coast, including documented variants of Valparaíso or Puerto de Paz, subject to verification of their precise geographic application.
Article 16 — Môle-Saint-Nicolas
The register shall include:
San Nicolás, Puerto de San Nicolás, and Bahía de San Nicolás, under Spanish usage;
Môle-Saint-Nicolas, under French usage;
Mòl Sen Nikola, under Haytian Creole usage.
Article 17 — Windward Passage
The maritime register shall preserve:
Paso de los Vientos or Canal del Viento;
Passage du Vent;
Windward Passage.
Article 18 — Artibonite
The forms Artibonite, Artibonito, Latibonit, and documented variants shall be preserved with their linguistic and historical classifications.
Article 19 — Unidentified Indigenous Names
Where Indigenous occupation is established but the original local name is not securely documented, the State shall record:
INDIGENOUS OCCUPATION AND TERRITORIAL USE ESTABLISHED — ORIGINAL LOCAL NAME NOT DOCUMENTARILY DETERMINED.
PART III — PRE-COLUMBIAN INDIGENOUS ORDER
Article 20 — Historical Priority
The constitutional history of the territory shall commence before 1492.
European arrival, mapping, naming, occupation, or settlement shall not constitute the origin of the territory.
Article 21 — Indigenous Occupation
Before European intervention, the North-West, Tortuga, Upper Artibonite, and western coast contained:
permanent and seasonal settlements;
cultivated lands;
conucos;
fisheries;
shellfish zones;
freshwater systems;
hunting and collection territories;
canoe routes;
river and mountain corridors;
political jurisdictions;
burial and ceremonial sites;
systems of production, exchange, and collective obligation.
Article 22 — Indigenous Government
Government operated through:
principal cacical authorities;
subordinate caciques;
nitainos and local officeholders;
village authorities;
kinship structures;
agricultural coordination;
redistribution;
diplomatic relations;
defensive mobilization;
customary law;
succession;
preservation of territorial memory.
These functions constitute organized Indigenous government.
Article 23 — Marién
Marién constituted a principal Indigenous political-territorial system associated with northern and North-Western Hayti.
Its relations extended toward:
Cuba;
the Bahamas;
the Windward Passage;
the northern coast;
inland valleys;
mountain corridors;
Artibonite;
neighboring Indigenous territories.
Article 24 — Guacanagarí
Guacanagarí shall be entered into the State Historical Register as a principal governing authority associated with Marién during the initial period of Spanish contact.
The archives shall preserve the documentary record concerning his government, alliances, territorial relations, and interactions with Spanish expeditions.
Article 25 — Pre-Columbian Tortuga
Before European settlement, Tortuga formed part of the Indigenous maritime geography of northern Hayti.
Its functions included or may have included, according to documentary and archaeological evidence:
fishing;
canoe navigation;
marine-resource use;
communication with the mainland;
seasonal or permanent settlement;
collection of freshwater and timber;
observation of the adjacent channel;
use of reefs, beaches, and coastal zones.
Article 26 — Upper Artibonite
The Upper Artibonite constituted an inland and riverine territorial interface supporting:
agriculture;
settlement;
watershed use;
mountain communications;
movement of persons and goods;
political relations among Marién, Maguana, Xaragua, and adjoining communities;
communications between the interior and the coast.
Article 27 — Ancestral Western Coast
The western coast formed part of the ancestral maritime and territorial system of Xaragua through:
coastal settlements;
bays and coves;
fisheries;
canoe routes;
agricultural outlets;
salt and marine-resource zones;
communication with Yaguana;
access to the Gulf of Gonâve;
relations with offshore islands;
connections with the southern peninsula.
Article 28 — Indigenous Economy
Production included, according to locality:
manioc;
maize;
sweet potatoes;
beans;
peppers;
fruits;
cotton;
medicinal plants;
fishing;
shellfish;
salt;
canoe and tool production.
Article 29 — Indigenous Maritime System
The maritime system included:
nearshore and offshore fishing;
inter-island navigation;
transport of persons and goods;
observation of winds and currents;
knowledge of reefs and channels;
access to Cuba and the Bahamas;
political and economic communication;
territorial defense.
Article 30 — Indigenous Continuity
The destruction of formal cacical institutions did not eliminate all Indigenous continuity.
Continuity shall be documented through surviving persons, descendants, mixed families, place names, agricultural knowledge, fisheries, navigation, vocabulary, material culture, and continuing territorial occupation.
PART IV — SPANISH COLONIAL INTERVENTION
Article 31 — Spanish Arrival
The arrival of Spanish expeditions on the North-Western coast in December 1492 commenced an external military, political, religious, economic, and geographic intervention.
Article 32 — La Navidad
La Navidad shall be classified as an attempted Spanish fortified settlement established within the pre-existing Indigenous political geography of Marién.
Article 33 — Spanish Colonial Measures
Spanish authority introduced:
claims of royal sovereignty;
military occupation;
compulsory tribute;
encomienda;
forced labor;
missionary administration;
land appropriation;
population displacement;
colonial courts;
maritime restrictions;
suppression of Indigenous authorities;
regulation of production and commerce.
Article 34 — Demographic Destruction
Warfare, forced labor, disease, displacement, malnutrition, and disruption of Indigenous production caused a major reduction of the Indigenous population.
Population loss shall not be interpreted as the disappearance of all Indigenous descendants or territorial rights.
Article 35 — Livestock and Hunting Territories
The introduction and multiplication of cattle, pigs, and other livestock transformed the region and subsequently supported the hunting economy of boucaniers operating outside effective Spanish control.
Article 36 — Spanish Maritime Policy
Spanish authorities attempted to preserve control over navigation, trade, settlement, ports, taxation, and relations with foreign Europeans.
Article 37 — Devastations and Withdrawal
The forced-relocation policies associated with the Devastations of Osorio weakened Spanish settlement in western and North-Western Hayti and facilitated the establishment of foreign hunters, cultivators, merchants, smugglers, and maritime groups.
PART V — TORTUGA: MULTI-ORIGIN POPULATION AND SOCIAL FORMATION
Article 38 — Multi-Origin Society
Seventeenth-century Tortuga developed as a multi-origin society composed of:
Indigenous survivors and descendants;
French settlers;
English settlers;
Dutch sailors and merchants;
other Europeans;
Africans and African-descended persons;
mixed Indigenous, African, and European families;
locally born Creoles;
religious refugees;
migrants, captives, fugitives, and displaced persons.
Article 39 — Separation of Historical Categories
The following categories shall be treated separately:
ancestry;
color;
geographic origin;
language;
religion;
freedom or enslavement;
contractual condition;
occupation;
military status;
political allegiance;
property status;
community membership.
Article 40 — African and African-Descended Persons
Africans and persons of African descent included persons who were:
free;
enslaved;
freed;
maroons;
fugitives;
sailors;
soldiers;
craftsmen;
cultivators;
merchants or intermediaries;
maritime workers;
members of mixed households;
persons of changing or undetermined status.
African origin shall not constitute automatic evidence of enslavement.
Article 41 — Europeans
Europeans included persons who were:
free settlers;
engagés;
servants;
debtors;
prisoners;
deportees;
coerced recruits;
subordinate sailors;
soldiers under command;
refugees;
fugitives;
dependent workers;
persons of changing or undetermined status.
European origin shall not constitute automatic evidence of freedom.
Article 42 — Indigenous Persons and Descendants
Indigenous persons and descendants may have appeared as:
members of surviving communities;
free persons;
coerced laborers;
captives;
cultivators;
fishers;
guides;
interpreters;
sailors;
spouses and relatives within mixed families;
persons incorporated into African, European, or Creole communities.
Article 43 — Mixed Families
Mixed families developed through:
marriage;
informal union;
kinship;
adoption;
household incorporation;
alliance;
migration;
maritime employment;
military association;
commerce;
enslavement and manumission;
coercion.
No uniform legal or social character shall be attributed to every mixed household.
Article 44 — Mobility of Status
A person’s status could change through:
completion or transfer of an engagement;
capture;
escape;
manumission;
military service;
maritime employment;
marriage;
migration;
change of occupying authority;
gubernatorial or judicial decision;
community recognition;
acquisition or loss of property.
Article 45 — Individual Classification
No person shall be classified as free, enslaved, engaged, captive, pirate, privateer, settler, or subject of a state solely on the basis of race, color, surname, ancestry, occupation, or residence.
PART VI — BOUCANIERS, FLIBUSTIERS, PRIVATEERS, AND PIRATES
Article 46 — Boucaniers
Boucaniers were principally hunters and processors of meat and hides using the boucan method.
A boucanier was not automatically a pirate or state combatant.
Article 47 — Flibustiers
Flibustiers were maritime raiders whose legal status depended upon commissions, wars, targets, territorial scope, and recognition by competing powers.
Article 48 — Privateers and Corsairs
Privateers or corsairs operated privately owned armed vessels under commissions or letters of marque issued by public authorities.
Article 49 — Pirates
Pirates conducted maritime robbery, seizure, or violence for private purposes without lawful authorization recognized by the prosecuting authority.
Article 50 — Royal Naval Forces
Royal naval forces acted directly under state command and shall be distinguished from privateers.
Article 51 — Chartered Companies
Chartered companies exercised powers derived from public concessions and shall be distinguished from the Crown, royal navy, independent settlers, and pirate associations.
Article 52 — Competing Classifications
A person authorized by one power could be treated as a pirate by another.
The archives shall identify the issuing authority, commission, conflict, targets, conduct, and competing legal classifications.
PART VII — FORTIFIED GOVERNMENT AND COLONIAL CONFLICT
Article 53 — Jean Le Vasseur
The government associated with Jean Le Vasseur during the 1640s shall be recorded as a principal stage in the fortified organization of Tortuga.
Article 54 — Fort de Rocher
Fort de Rocher is classified as:
a fortified governmental site;
a military installation;
a maritime-control position;
evidence of European competition;
a protected archaeological jurisdiction.
Article 55 — Spanish Counteroffensives
Spanish attacks sought to remove foreign settlers, destroy fortifications, suppress contraband, terminate maritime raids, and restore Spanish control.
The major assault of 1654 shall form part of the permanent military record.
Article 56 — Changes of Control
The General Archives shall maintain a chronological record of French, English, Spanish, proprietary, company, gubernatorial, and royal authority over Tortuga.
PART VIII — HUGUENOTS, ENGAGÉS, AND LABOR SYSTEMS
Article 57 — French Protestant Presence
French Protestants participated in Caribbean networks of settlement, commerce, cultivation, navigation, and privateering.
No French resident shall be classified as Huguenot without evidence.
Article 58 — Religious Displacement
The revocation of the Edict of Nantes by the Edict of Fontainebleau in 1685 contributed to the departure, concealment, forced conversion, and international displacement of French Protestants.
Article 59 — Engagés
Engagés were persons bound by fixed-term labor contracts, frequently for three years, in exchange for transportation, maintenance, and eventual release or compensation.
Article 60 — Conditions of Engagement
The archives shall document:
recruitment;
coercion;
transfer of contracts;
physical punishment;
restrictions on movement;
excessive labor;
extension of service;
mortality;
escape;
release.
European contractual status did not necessarily provide practical freedom.
Article 61 — Expansion of African Enslavement
The expansion of plantations increased the forced transportation and hereditary enslavement of Africans.
The system imposed sale, transfer, compulsory labor, racial classification, restrictions on family life, denial of legal capacity, and colonial policing.
Article 62 — Free and Freed Populations
The expansion of slavery did not eliminate the presence of free-born, manumitted, fugitive, maroon, maritime, military, artisanal, agricultural, commercial, or property-holding African-descended persons.
PART IX — PORT-DE-PAIX AND FRENCH COLONIAL GOVERNMENT
Article 63 — Establishment of Port-de-Paix
Port-de-Paix developed beginning in 1665 as a French mainland settlement and governmental center under the authority associated with Bertrand d’Ogeron.
Article 64 — Government of Bertrand d’Ogeron
The administration pursued:
permanent settlement;
agricultural expansion;
population recruitment;
regulation of maritime actors;
development of ports;
extension of gubernatorial authority;
relations with companies;
consolidation of French control.
Article 65 — Colonial Institutions
French colonial government operated through governors, military commanders, company officials, courts, parishes, customs authorities, fiscal regulations, colonial ordinances, royal commissioners, metropolitan ministries, and naval forces.
Article 66 — Governmental Seat
Port-de-Paix exercised principal governmental functions in the developing French colony before the transfer of the principal northern seat to Cap-Français in 1711.
Article 67 — Treaty of Ryswick
The Treaty of Ryswick of 1697 shall be recorded as the principal European interstate instrument recognizing French possession in western Hispaniola.
PART X — CREOLE SOCIETY, SLAVERY, FREEDOM, AND RESISTANCE
Article 68 — Creole Population Formation
The interaction of Indigenous, African, European, and mixed populations contributed to the formation of a locally constituted Creole society possessing:
territorial knowledge;
maritime skills;
agricultural practices;
multilingual influences;
kinship networks;
commercial relations;
military experience;
local cultural institutions.
Article 69 — No Racial Presumption
Official records shall not state or imply that:
every Black person was enslaved;
every White person was free;
every mixed person possessed an intermediate status;
every Indigenous person disappeared;
ancestry alone determined legal capacity or political position.
Article 70 — Intermediate and Disputed Conditions
The archives shall document conditional freedom, disputed manumission, temporary captivity, contractual dependence, military exemption, fugitive status, foreign protection, maritime service, and other conditions not reducible to a binary classification.
Article 71 — Resistance
Resistance included:
escape;
marronage;
refusal of labor;
armed revolt;
maritime flight;
prohibited commerce;
destruction of colonial property;
preservation of independent networks;
military participation;
formation of independent rural and maritime communities.
PART XI — HAYTIAN REVOLUTION AND INDEPENDENCE
Article 72 — Revolutionary Transformation
The general uprising beginning in 1791 initiated the destruction of the colonial slaveholding order.
The North-West became contested by insurgent forces, colonial authorities, French republican commissioners, Spanish forces, British forces, autonomous commanders, cultivators, maroons, and foreign naval forces.
Article 73 — Strategic Functions
The North-West possessed strategic importance through Port-de-Paix, Tortuga, the Windward Passage, proximity to Cuba, mountain routes, agricultural supply, coastal communications, maritime landings, and access to Artibonite.
Article 74 — French Expedition of 1802
The French expedition of 1802 sought to restore direct metropolitan authority and subordinate the military order established in Saint-Domingue.
Article 75 — François Capois
François Capois, known as Capois-la-Mort, shall be entered into the State Military Register as a native of the Port-de-Paix region, a revolutionary officer, and a principal commander of the War of Independence.
Article 76 — Independence
The Declaration of Independence of 1 January 1804 terminated French colonial government and incorporated Port-de-Paix, Tortuga, the North-West, the Upper Artibonite approaches, and the western coastal system into the independent State of Hayti.
PART XII — POST-INDEPENDENCE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT
Article 77 — Government under Dessalines
Following the termination of French colonial government and the proclamation of independence on 1 January 1804, Port-de-Paix, Île de la Tortue, the North-Western littoral, the Upper Artibonite approaches, and the western coastal system formed part of the territorial, military, maritime, agricultural, and administrative order established under Governor-General and subsequently Emperor Jean-Jacques Dessalines.
The region retained and developed functions concerning:
territorial defense;
port administration;
coastal surveillance;
military communications;
agricultural production;
internal and maritime commerce;
navigation through the Windward Passage;
relations with Cuba, Jamaica, the Bahamas, and the wider Caribbean;
control of roads and mountain corridors connecting the coast with the interior;
maintenance of the territorial unity of the independent State of Hayti.
Article 78 — Constitutional Division of 1806
Following the death of Jean-Jacques Dessalines in October 1806, Port-de-Paix, Tortuga, the North-West, and the northern approaches were incorporated into the constitutional and administrative arrangements established under the Constitution of 1806.
Article 79 — Northern State and Kingdom
The North-West subsequently formed part of the northern State of Hayti and Kingdom of Hayti under Henry Christophe.
Article 80 — Reunification
Following the termination of the northern monarchy in 1820, the region was incorporated into the reunified national administration under Jean-Pierre Boyer.
Article 81 — Nineteenth-Century Functions
Port-de-Paix retained its functions as a port, military jurisdiction, commercial center, agricultural outlet, regional administrative seat, interface with Tortuga, and point of Caribbean communication.
Article 82 — United States Occupation
From 1915 to 1934, the North-West and Upper Artibonite were subjected to the financial, military, policing, labor, road, customs, and administrative systems of the United States occupation.
Article 83 — Contemporary Position
Port-de-Paix remains the principal urban and port center of the North-West, while Tortuga maintains a distinct insular, maritime, fisheries, and historical identity.
PART XIII — PROTECTION OF AUTONOMOUS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES
Article 84 — Recognition
Xaragua may recognize autonomous Indigenous communities situated within the North-West, Tortuga, Upper Artibonite, and western coastal system.
Article 85 — Community Autonomy
Recognized communities may regulate their internal cultural, customary, social, environmental, fisheries, property, membership, and ceremonial affairs through their own institutions.
Article 86 — Protection by Xaragua
Xaragua shall protect recognized Indigenous communities against:
forced displacement;
unauthorized land appropriation;
destruction of historical sites;
unlawful removal of archaeological materials;
exclusion from traditional fisheries;
appropriation of traditional knowledge;
involuntary assimilation;
unauthorized commercial exploitation of cultural identity.
Article 87 — Representation
Xaragua may represent or assist a recognized community in external, academic, cultural, environmental, economic, or Indigenous-rights matters at the request of the community or pursuant to a standing constitutional instrument.
Article 88 — Non-Substitution
Protection, financing, investment, or external representation by Xaragua shall not replace the internal institutions of the recognized Indigenous community.
Article 89 — No Separate Sovereignty
Community autonomy shall not create a sovereign territory, independent state, or constitutional order separate from Xaragua.
PART XIV — WESTERN ANCESTRAL MARITIME ACCESS SYSTEM
Article 90 — Historical Status of the Western Coast
The western coast is recorded as a component of the ancestral territorial and maritime order of Xaragua.
This status includes the Bay of Port-au-Prince and other western coastal spaces historically connected with Yaguana, the Region of the Palmes, the Gulf of Gonâve, Miragoâne, and the Grand South.
Article 91 — Demographic Transformation
The establishment and concentration of exogenous and post-Indigenous populations, particularly in the Bay of Port-au-Prince, altered the demographic and administrative structure of the western coast.
Such transformation shall not extinguish the original Indigenous jurisdiction of Xaragua.
Article 92 — No Direct Administration of Exogenous Populations
Xaragua shall not directly administer the ordinary civil affairs of exogenous or non-incorporated populations established within the Western Maritime Access System.
Article 93 — Original Ancestral Right
Xaragua permanently preserves its:
original territorial right;
sovereign customary Indigenous jurisdiction;
ancestral coastal title;
right of access to the sea;
right to maintain maritime communities;
right to protect historical and archaeological sites;
right to use bays, coves, anchorages, and landing points;
right to participate in coastal investment and economic development;
right to protect marine and coastal resources;
right to maintain maritime claims and registers.
Article 94 — Functional Character
The Western Maritime Access System shall not be organized as a continuous civil-administration district.
It shall operate principally through designated:
bays;
coves;
anchorages;
ports;
beaches and landing points;
maritime corridors;
fisheries;
island connections;
historical sites;
institutional properties;
economic projects;
environmental zones.
Article 95 — Bay of Port-au-Prince
The presence of a large exogenous population within the Bay of Port-au-Prince shall not eliminate the ancestral maritime character of the bay.
Xaragua’s functions within the bay shall principally concern:
access points;
navigation;
maritime corridors;
coastal heritage;
environmental protection;
fisheries;
institutional investments;
historical sites;
relations with Indigenous and maritime communities;
access to the Gulf of Gonâve.
Article 96 — Territorial Access Points
An access point may consist of:
an anchorage;
a landing site;
a wharf;
a ferry terminal;
a fishing station;
a research facility;
an emergency shelter;
a cultural or historical site;
an institutional property;
a maritime logistics installation.
Article 97 — No Abandonment through Discontinuous Use
The exercise of jurisdiction through separate access points rather than continuous direct civil administration shall not constitute fragmentation, abandonment, or renunciation of the underlying Indigenous territorial title.
PART XV — SEA RIGHTS AND MARITIME JURISDICTION
Article 98 — Ancestral Relationship with the Sea
The sea, littoral, fisheries, reefs, channels, islands, and maritime routes attached to the ancestral territory form part of the Indigenous territorial system of Xaragua.
Article 99 — Maritime Zones
Xaragua shall maintain constitutional and technical records concerning:
internal waters;
baselines;
territorial sea;
contiguous maritime interests;
exclusive economic zone interests;
continental-shelf interests;
fisheries zones;
navigation corridors;
marine-conservation zones;
submerged archaeological territories.
Article 100 — Exclusive Economic Zone
The exclusive economic zone claimed or maintained by Xaragua shall be treated as a maritime zone connected to its ancestral coasts, islands, communities, economic rights, marine resources, and constitutional territorial order.
Article 101 — Bays, Coves, and Anchorages
Xaragua may classify, use, protect, develop, finance, or participate in bays, coves, roadsteads, and anchorages through institutional acts, property rights, community arrangements, investment instruments, or maritime agreements.
Article 102 — Fisheries
Xaragua may establish fisheries programs concerning:
traditional access;
food security;
conservation;
processing;
markets;
vessel safety;
fishing equipment;
marine research;
protected species;
community economic participation.
Article 103 — Maritime Communities
Xaragua may recognize and protect maritime communities engaged in fishing, navigation, boat construction, coastal transport, environmental stewardship, marine research, rescue, and transmission of maritime knowledge.
Article 104 — Maritime Safety
Xaraguayan institutions may maintain capacities concerning navigation, emergency communications, search and rescue, evacuation, hydrographic information, disaster logistics, and protection of maritime sites.
PART XVI — INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION
Article 105 — Power to Invest
Xaragua may invest within Port-de-Paix, Tortuga, the North-West, Upper Artibonite, and the Western Maritime Access System without assuming direct ordinary administration of the surrounding civil population.
Article 106 — Authorized Sectors
Investment may concern:
fisheries;
agriculture;
water systems;
renewable energy;
port and landing infrastructure;
ferries and coastal transport;
boat construction and repair;
storage;
food processing;
telecommunications;
historical restoration;
archaeological protection;
cultural and ecological tourism;
university and research facilities;
emergency infrastructure.
Article 107 — Community Participation
Projects affecting a recognized Indigenous community shall provide for its participation, consultation, economic benefit, protection of community property, and preservation of traditional knowledge.
Article 108 — Investment without Political Substitution
Ownership, financing, technical assistance, or economic participation by Xaragua shall not automatically create direct municipal government over non-incorporated populations.
Article 109 — Historical Tourism
Historical tourism may include:
Marién;
Indigenous maritime routes;
Tortuga before European settlement;
boucaniers;
flibustiers;
privateering and piracy;
Fort de Rocher;
Huguenot migration;
engagés;
African and Creole population formation;
slavery, freedom, and resistance;
the Haytian Revolution;
François Capois;
maritime archaeology.
Documentary history shall be distinguished from commercial legend.
PART XVII — HISTORICAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, AND ARCHIVAL GOVERNANCE
Article 110 — Protected Historical Landscape
Protected sites may include:
Indigenous settlements;
conucos;
burial sites;
canoe routes;
colonial contact zones;
early European settlements;
forts;
ports;
plantations;
maroon sites;
revolutionary sites;
shipwrecks;
historic roads;
cultural landscapes.
Article 111 — Archaeological Authorization
No archaeological material shall be removed, sold, exported, altered, or commercially exploited under Xaraguayan authority without prior authorization, documentation, conservation, custody, archival deposit, and protection of human remains.
Article 112 — Population and Legal-Status Register
The General Archives shall separately document:
Indigenous persons and descendants;
free persons;
enslaved persons;
freed persons;
engagés;
servants;
sailors;
soldiers;
captives;
fugitives;
maroons;
mixed families;
persons of disputed or undetermined status.
Article 113 — Evidentiary Standard
Race, color, surname, ancestry, religion, occupation, or national origin shall not substitute for evidence of legal condition.
Where the condition cannot be established, the record shall state:
LEGAL CONDITION UNDETERMINED ON THE AVAILABLE DOCUMENTARY RECORD.
Article 114 — State Archives
Authoritative or certified records may be maintained at:
Miragoâne;
Port-de-Paix;
Tortuga;
the Upper Artibonite;
designated University of Xaragua facilities;
secure digital repositories.
PART XVIII — STATE INSTITUTIONS
Article 115 — Northern and Western Maritime Authority
A Northern and Western Maritime Authority may be established under the Office of the Rector-President.
It shall coordinate:
territorial registration;
Indigenous-community protection;
maritime mapping;
archives;
archaeology;
fisheries;
ports and anchorages;
investment;
environmental protection;
emergency planning.
Article 116 — Tortuga Division
A Tortuga Division may exercise functions concerning Indigenous history, mixed population formation, maritime archaeology, Fort de Rocher, fisheries, environmental protection, investment, and community relations.
Article 117 — Port-de-Paix Division
A Port-de-Paix Division may coordinate port studies, archives, maritime programs, historical research, investment, and relations with Tortuga.
Article 118 — Upper Artibonite Division
An Upper Artibonite Division may coordinate watershed protection, agriculture, Indigenous territorial research, inland communications, investment, and interior-to-coast logistics.
Article 119 — Western Maritime Access Division
A Western Maritime Access Division may identify, register, protect, acquire, finance, or develop Xaraguayan access points, bays, coves, anchorages, institutional properties, maritime corridors, and coastal projects.