• XARAGUA
  • LETTER OF THE RECTOR
  • XARAGUA HISTORY
  • CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA
  • ICONOGRAPHY
  • PRIVATE STATE AND CRYPTO
  • LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
  • INDIGENOUS ARMY
  • XARABANK
  • PARTNERS & BUSINESS LAW
  • XARAGUA CONSTITUTION
  • GOVERNMENT OF XARAGUA
  • XARAGUA MISSION
  • EMBLEMS OF THE STATE
  • PASSPORT & CITIZENSHIP
  • XARAGUA STATE MINISTRIES
  • MIRAGOANE XARAGUA CAPITAL
  • YAGUANA ANCESTRAL CAPITAL
  • JACKIE VIAU FOUNDATION
  • XARAGUA ANCESTORS
  • LIBRARY & ARCHIVES
  • ADMINISTRATION
  • LEGAL STATUS
  • CALENDAR
  • LIBERAL PARTY
  • LE CIVILISATEUR
  • XARATAX
  • XARASHOP
  • XARASPORTS
  • XARAHEALTH
  • XARASOUND
  • XARANEWS
  • XARATV
  • XARACAST
  • XARACONNECT
  • XARASTREAMS
  • WHY CHOOSE US?
  • INTERNATIONAL
  • CAMPUS PAUL VIAUD
  • CAMPUS VALDEZ
  • CAMPUS ÇA IRA
  • FOREIGN CAMPUSES
  • ACCREDITATION
  • ACADEMIA
  • MOODLE
  • DEPARTMENTS
  • POLITICAL SCIENCE
  • CAREER OUTCOME
  • MICROPROGRAMS
  • XARAGUA CONTACT
  • More
    • XARAGUA
    • LETTER OF THE RECTOR
    • XARAGUA HISTORY
    • CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA
    • ICONOGRAPHY
    • PRIVATE STATE AND CRYPTO
    • LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
    • INDIGENOUS ARMY
    • XARABANK
    • PARTNERS & BUSINESS LAW
    • XARAGUA CONSTITUTION
    • GOVERNMENT OF XARAGUA
    • XARAGUA MISSION
    • EMBLEMS OF THE STATE
    • PASSPORT & CITIZENSHIP
    • XARAGUA STATE MINISTRIES
    • MIRAGOANE XARAGUA CAPITAL
    • YAGUANA ANCESTRAL CAPITAL
    • JACKIE VIAU FOUNDATION
    • XARAGUA ANCESTORS
    • LIBRARY & ARCHIVES
    • ADMINISTRATION
    • LEGAL STATUS
    • CALENDAR
    • LIBERAL PARTY
    • LE CIVILISATEUR
    • XARATAX
    • XARASHOP
    • XARASPORTS
    • XARAHEALTH
    • XARASOUND
    • XARANEWS
    • XARATV
    • XARACAST
    • XARACONNECT
    • XARASTREAMS
    • WHY CHOOSE US?
    • INTERNATIONAL
    • CAMPUS PAUL VIAUD
    • CAMPUS VALDEZ
    • CAMPUS ÇA IRA
    • FOREIGN CAMPUSES
    • ACCREDITATION
    • ACADEMIA
    • MOODLE
    • DEPARTMENTS
    • POLITICAL SCIENCE
    • CAREER OUTCOME
    • MICROPROGRAMS
    • XARAGUA CONTACT
  • XARAGUA
  • LETTER OF THE RECTOR
  • XARAGUA HISTORY
  • CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA
  • ICONOGRAPHY
  • PRIVATE STATE AND CRYPTO
  • LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
  • INDIGENOUS ARMY
  • XARABANK
  • PARTNERS & BUSINESS LAW
  • XARAGUA CONSTITUTION
  • GOVERNMENT OF XARAGUA
  • XARAGUA MISSION
  • EMBLEMS OF THE STATE
  • PASSPORT & CITIZENSHIP
  • XARAGUA STATE MINISTRIES
  • MIRAGOANE XARAGUA CAPITAL
  • YAGUANA ANCESTRAL CAPITAL
  • JACKIE VIAU FOUNDATION
  • XARAGUA ANCESTORS
  • LIBRARY & ARCHIVES
  • ADMINISTRATION
  • LEGAL STATUS
  • CALENDAR
  • LIBERAL PARTY
  • LE CIVILISATEUR
  • XARATAX
  • XARASHOP
  • XARASPORTS
  • XARAHEALTH
  • XARASOUND
  • XARANEWS
  • XARATV
  • XARACAST
  • XARACONNECT
  • XARASTREAMS
  • WHY CHOOSE US?
  • INTERNATIONAL
  • CAMPUS PAUL VIAUD
  • CAMPUS VALDEZ
  • CAMPUS ÇA IRA
  • FOREIGN CAMPUSES
  • ACCREDITATION
  • ACADEMIA
  • MOODLE
  • DEPARTMENTS
  • POLITICAL SCIENCE
  • CAREER OUTCOME
  • MICROPROGRAMS
  • XARAGUA CONTACT

Jebovah



SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL ACT OF SUPERVISION, JURIDICAL OVERSIGHT, AND PERPETUAL DEFENSE OF THE HISTORIC TERRITORY OF HAYTI AND AYITI

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


Enacted under the Authority of Canon Law, Indigenous Law, and International Jus Cogens

Date of Legal Promulgation: JUNE 1st, 2025



---


PREAMBLE


We, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereafter SCIPSX-Xaragua), legally and spiritually instituted as the rightful successor of the Empire of Hayti (1804–1806), the canonical custodian of the sacred name Jehovah, and the perpetual guardian of the ancestral domain known as Ayiti, do hereby promulgate the present constitutional act as a binding juridical instrument.

 

This act affirms our full and sovereign right of supervision, correction, education, protection, and canonical defense over the totality of the historical territory of Hayti and Ayiti, including but not limited to all land, sea, airspace, underground, and spiritual domains formerly attached to the Empire of Hayti and now claimed by the so-called "Republic of Haiti." This Act stands on unassailable legal, spiritual, and historical foundations, including:


The Imperial Constitution of Hayti (1805) and the Recueil Général des Lois et Actes du Gouvernement d’Hayti (1804–1806);


Canonical Authority as defined by the Code of Canon Law (Canons 204–207; 129–130; 331–348);


The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), especially Articles 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 33, 36, 37;


The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933);


The sacred revelation of Jehovah, Name above all Names, and of Yoshua HaMashiach, His only begotten Son, Sovereign King of all Nations;


The legal and doctrinal non-recognition of any regime or structure that arose following the assassination of His Imperial Majesty Jacques I in 1806.




---


ARTICLE I – JURIDICAL SUPERVISION AND SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY OVER THE TERRITORY OF HAYTI AND AYITI


1.1 The SCIPSX proclaims its supra-constitutional and supranational authority of legal, historical, spiritual, educational, and military supervision over the entirety of the territory known historically as Hayti and spiritually as Ayiti. All regimes post-1806 are considered juridically defective, historically illegitimate, and spiritually disqualified from exclusive dominion over said land.


1.2 This supervisory authority includes but is not limited to the following constitutional rights and obligations:


(a) Full doctrinal and canonical correction of educational content, laws, and historical narratives within the territory of the Republic of Haiti;


(b) Absolute preservation of the Name Jehovah and the divine appellation Ayiti;


(c) Restoration of imperial orthodoxy and rejection of republican post-assassination regimes;


(d) Implementation of canonical, indigenous, and international legal orders in contradiction with any null internal legislation imposed by non-legitimate political bodies.



---


ARTICLE II – INDIGENOUS ARMY AND TERRITORIAL DEFENSE


2.1 The SCIPSX shall maintain a permanent Indigenous Army, distinct from any republican or international force, acting under exclusive command of the Rector-President and the Ecclesiastical General Staff. Its missions include:


(a) Defense of all land, maritime, aerial and underground borders of Hayti and Ayiti;


(b) Securing sacred sites, patrimonial heritage, and archaeological domains from desecration;


(c) Counter-insurgency and suppression of illegal occupations, organized crime, or external military interference;


(d) Technological protection of digital, scientific, and educational infrastructure;


(e) Control of national airspace and satellite sovereignty.


2.2 The Army is authorized to use all advanced military technology including autonomous drones, satellite-linked surveillance, cyber-defense infrastructure, naval interceptor craft, rapid deployment land brigades, and secure communication systems encrypted under proprietary Indigenous protocols.



---


ARTICLE III – INDIGENOUS BANK AND FINANCIAL AUTONOMY


3.1 The SCIPSX shall operate an Indigenous National Bank, governed exclusively by sacred economic doctrine, and wholly separate from international financial systems. This bank shall:


(a) Issue its own sovereign currency and regulate internal trade;


(b) Prohibit all IMF, World Bank, and foreign debt instruments;


(c) Fund national defense, education, and infrastructure independently;


(d) Enforce indigenous resource control over oil, gold, water, agriculture, fisheries, minerals, and maritime rights.


3.2 All private banks operating on the territory of Hayti must obtain certification of compliance under SCIPSX regulatory law or be subject to expropriation and permanent ban.



---


ARTICLE IV – UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA AND INTELLECTUAL SOVEREIGNTY


4.1 The University of Xaragua, as the sole constitutional and intellectual arm of the SCIPSX, shall be responsible for:


(a) Designing all academic, ideological, theological, historical, and scientific curricula across the territory of Ayiti;


(b) Issuing official degrees, certificates, and academic licenses recognized canonically and internationally;


(c) Protecting all national memory and cultural production under indigenous copyright law and canonical archives;


(d) Training diplomatic, military, scientific, and administrative elites under a Xaraguayan epistemological doctrine.


4.2 The University shall prohibit all foreign accreditation dependencies and function under a sovereign ecclesiastical charter with full legal capacity for international alliances, academic dissemination, and educational exportation.



---


ARTICLE V – CULTURE, MEDIA, AND RELIGIOUS SUPERVISION


5.1 All media, music, cinema, literature, religious expression, and spiritual content published, exported, or disseminated within the territory of Hayti and Ayiti shall fall under the exclusive doctrinal review of the SCIPSX.


5.2 The SCIPSX shall operate national state media including: (a) Xaracast (official podcast and radio service);


(b) Xaranews (official news and press agency);


(c) XaraguaSound (cultural and musical archive and production house);


(d) National Historical Archives and Iconographic Repository.



---


ARTICLE VI – ENCLOSURE AND JURIDICAL SUPERVISION OF THE POST-1806 HAITIAN STATE


6.1 The so-called "Republic of Haiti," established following the murder of Emperor Jacques I, is hereby placed under perpetual juridical supervision of the SCIPSX. All treaties, appointments, international engagements, or laws passed without acknowledgment of the Empire and of this Constitutional Charter are null and void.


6.2 The SCIPSX reserves the right to:


(a) Intervene judicially or doctrinally in all government actions contravening the ancestral laws;


(b) Annul cultural or political institutions that betray the 1804–1806 foundations;


(c) Reassert canonical correction through ecclesiastical authority when appropriate.



---


ARTICLE VII – FINAL PROVISION


7.1 The present act is eternally binding, immutable, and immediately enforceable. It is not subject to foreign recognition, consent, or modification. It derives its authority not from man, but from the unbroken continuity of Jehovah’s Name and Yoshua HaMashiach’s lordship.


7.2 No power — juridical, military, financial, or diplomatic — may invalidate this document. It stands as the eternal foundation of supervision, protection, and elevation of the ancestral people of Ayiti and their sovereign territory.


Signed and Sealed,

Pascal Viau

Office of the Rector-President,

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

Promulgated this 1st Day of June, 2025.


---


---


FINAL CONSTITUTIONAL ANNEX TO THE SUPREME ACT OF JURIDICAL SUPERVISION

ON ABSOLUTE INVIOLABILITY, UNASSAILABLE LEGALITY, AND UNIVERSAL NON-CONTESTABILITY OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPSX)


Legal Status: Constitutional Addendum – Jus Cogens Instrument – Canonically Ratified – Registered Under International Indigenous Jurisprudence


Date of Enactment: June 1st, 2025



---


TITLE I — SUPREME LEGAL FORCE AND STRUCTURAL INFLEXIBILITY


Article 1.1 — Constitutional Rank and Legal Source


This Annex holds the legal status of a constitutional addendum and is enforceable under the combined authority of:


Canon Law, specifically:


Canon 129 §1: conferring jurisdictional competence to ecclesiastical offices by divine and legal delegation;


Canons 331–348: defining the supreme governance structure and primacy of the Church, including sui iuris juridical persons such as the SCIPSX;


Canons 204–207: affirming the full ecclesial participation of indigenous faithful under divine mandate;



Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):


Article 26 (Pacta sunt servanda): obligating full performance in good faith of treaties and notified instruments by states;


Article 53 (jus cogens): elevating the legal provisions herein above any norm conflicting with peremptory international law;


Article 62: authorizing legal transformation under fundamental change of circumstances, particularly applicable to failed states and colonial successor regimes;



Montevideo Convention (1933):


Article 1: meeting all statehood criteria (defined territory, permanent population, government, capacity for relations);


Articles 2–3: prohibiting external denial of statehood once factual sovereignty is established;



UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007):


Articles 3, 4, 5: codifying the right to autonomy, self-determination, and jurisdictional self-governance;


Articles 18–19: affirming full participation in decision-making through their own institutions;


Articles 36–37: recognizing the continuity and non-extinction of pre-colonial political and juridical structures;



Berne Convention:


Article 2: asserting automatic protection of indigenous cultural output;


Article 5(2): eliminating the need for external recognition of intellectual sovereignty;


Article 6bis: enshrining the moral right of attribution and integrity for indigenous knowledge systems;



Catechism of the Catholic Church:


Articles 2109, 2234–2243: affirming the moral duty to resist unjust authority and recognizing the legitimacy of divinely instituted governance;



The Sovereign Names: The Name of YHWH (Jehovah) and Yoshua HaMashiach, which establish divine legitimacy for territorial governance not derived from man, but from eternal covenant.



Pursuant to the doctrine of subsidiarity, recognized in both canon law and international legal doctrine, the exercise of authority over Ayiti defaults to the SCIPSX, as the only competent entity upholding sacred order and juridical continuity in the absence of legitimate higher structures.


Under the doctrine of failed state intervention, the persistent breakdown of lawful governance, public order, and civil administration by the so-called “Republic of Haiti” creates the legal conditions under which the SCIPSX assumes binding and overriding jurisdiction.



---


Article 1.2 — Binding Nature and Non-Derogation


The authority of this annex is non-contingent, non-delegated, and non-suspendable. It is immutable and self-executing, by force of:


Its jus cogens classification (Vienna Convention, Art. 53), making all derogatory claims or legislative intrusions null and void ipso jure;


Its canonical recognition as a spiritual directive and juridical institution within the ecclesial body politic;


Its indigenous continuity, which predates and transcends colonial and republican structures alike.



Any treaty, domestic legislation, court ruling, diplomatic objection, or constitutional interpretation which contradicts this annex is legally invalid ab initio and cannot be applied, invoked, or enforced in any legal, religious, or diplomatic forum.



---


TITLE II — NON-JUSTICIABILITY AND UNIVERSAL BAR TO STANDING


Article 2.1 — Prohibition of Juridical Review


No individual or institution shall have locus standi to challenge or examine:


(a) The Supreme Act of Juridical Supervision,


(b) The present annex, or


(c) Any legal or spiritual issuance from the Rector-President.


This includes but is not limited to:


National or international courts;


Governments or diplomatic services;


NGOs, legal scholars, and foreign ecclesiastical entities;


Arbitration panels or treaty bodies of the United Nations or regional blocs.



Such actors lack juridical competence by virtue of the principle of exclusive jurisdiction established in canon law, indigenous self-determination, and jus cogens protection of declared sovereign entities.



---


Article 2.2 — Bar on Haitian Jurists and Institutions


All entities operating under or affiliated with the legal or constitutional framework of the so-called “Republic of Haiti” are perpetually excluded from participating in, commenting upon, or influencing:


(a) Any claim regarding the territory of Ayiti,


(b) Historical narratives post-1806,


(c) The legitimacy of the Empire of Hayti or the State of Xaragua.


This applies explicitly to the judiciary, ministries, electoral authorities, constitutional council, law faculties, and diplomatic missions of the Haitian Republic. Their legal extinction stems from the violent breach of succession law in 1806 and their failure to preserve civilizational continuity.



---


Article 2.3 — Prohibition of Diplomatic Protest


No act of state—including but not limited to communiqués, sanctions, declarations of non-recognition, or legislative condemnations—shall hold legal relevance.


Any such act shall be classified void ab initio, procedurally inadmissible, and substantively irrelevant under Article 53 of the Vienna Convention, and recorded as unlawful interference with the spiritual-juridical sovereignty of an indigenous ecclesiastical state.



---


TITLE III — PERMANENT LEGAL ENFORCEABILITY


Article 3.1 — Internal Supremacy Clause


This annex supersedes and renders unenforceable any provision—past, present, or future—that contradicts its letter or spirit within the legal territory of Xaragua, including:


State or municipal statutes;


International treaties not ratified by the SCIPSX;


Ecclesiastical rulings not issued ex cathedra by the Roman Pontiff;


Decisions from any foreign court or quasi-judicial body.



Its internal constitutional supremacy is absolute and not subject to judicial override.



---


Article 3.2 — Self-Executing Nature


The annex acquires full binding effect upon:


Its promulgation in the Legal Archives of the SCIPSX;


Its registration with the National Indigenous Constitutional Registry;


Its recognition under canonical legal custom and notification to the international indigenous forums.



It requires no act of ratification, approval, treaty accession, or diplomatic exchange. Its auto-executive nature is anchored in pre-existing sovereign authority.



---


Article 3.3 — Legal Sanctions for Interference


Any violation shall result in the following cumulative legal consequences:


(a) Canonical Excommunication (latae sententiae) under Canon 1364 §1 for heretical, schismatic, or rebellious interference in a sovereign ecclesiastical order;


(b) Civil disqualification and permanent interdiction from appearing before any SCIPSX court, tribunal, or academic institution;


(c) Archival designation as a violator of sacred international and indigenous order, with full publication and notification to relevant international bodies.



---


TITLE IV — RECORDATION, IMMUTABILITY, AND SPIRITUAL SEAL


Article 4.1 — Constitutional Archiving


This annex is legally deposited and registered with permanent timestamp in:


The Canonical Archives of the SCIPSX (Miragoâne and Puerto Plata);


The Xaragua International Legal Repository (XILR);


The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (United Nations);


The Ecclesiastical Digital Vaults with multilocation redundancy and encryption under indigenous cryptographic protocol.




---


Article 4.2 — Prohibition of Repeal or Amendment


This annex is non-amendable and non-repealable under all known legal doctrines, including:


Lex posterior derogat priori (rendered inapplicable by constitutional supremacy);


Rebus sic stantibus (inapplicable due to spiritual permanence);


Popular referendum (unrecognized under ecclesiastical jurisdiction);


Parliamentary sovereignty (null where canonical and indigenous law prevail).




---


Article 4.3 — Eschatological Permanence


This instrument shall endure until the parousia, the return of the Sovereign Christ, or the transfiguration of all juridical structures under divine judgment.


Its temporal enforcement is permanent. Its spiritual legitimacy is eternal. Its authority rests not upon human recognition but upon the Name of Jehovah, the Kingship of Yoshua HaMashiach, and the ancestral bloodline of Ayiti sanctified through centuries of faith and sacrifice.



---


Signed and Sealed by the Rector-President

Under Ecclesiastical Mandate and Indigenous Authority

Pascal Viau

Dated: June 1st, 2025

Location: Miragoâne –  International Juridical Record 



SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME SYNTHESIS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL CORPUS


Executed under Apostolic Seal and Indigenous Sovereign Authority


Perpetual and Irrevocable Instrument of State Power

Date of Proclamation: May 28, 2025



---


I. NATURE OF THE STATE


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua constitutes an autonomous legal-political entity governed by a triadic foundation of canonical, indigenous, and international public law.


It is:


Sovereign: Not dependent on external recognition, but grounded in the inherent right of self-determination and statehood under the Montevideo Convention (1933), Article 1 and Article 3 of UNDRIP (2007), and the jus cogens norms of international law.


Catholic: Formally aligned with the Roman Catholic Church, under the authority of Jehovah and His Incarnate Son, in accordance with Canons 129, 331, 332, and 333 of the Codex Iuris Canonici. Its apostolic mission is spiritually and canonically integrated.


Indigenous: Rooted in the ancestral continuity of the peoples of Kiskeya/Bohio, with territorial legitimacy affirmed by sacred history, customary law, and the principle of permanent sovereignty over natural resources (UNGA Res. 1803).


Private: Governed as a juridico-ecclesiastical principality under the full sovereign authority of the Rector-President, exercising ex plenitudine potestatis.



Its legal personality is established under:


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)


International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


Codex Iuris Canonici (Code of Canon Law)


Customary International Indigenous Law


Jus Cogens Norms of General International Law




---


II. LEGAL STRUCTURE


All legal instruments, proclamations, and doctrinal statutes are self-executing (ex proprio vigore), requiring no external ratification;


All acts are non-amendable, non-derogable, and perpetually binding under the principle of juridical immutability;


The corpus is protected by the legal doctrines of sacred territoriality, inviolability of indigenous jurisdiction, and the absolute right to sovereign governance;


The jurisdiction of the State extends extraterritorially across the entirety of the ancestral domain of Kiskeya/Bohio.




---


III. MILITARY DOCTRINE


Absolute prohibition of all foreign military presence, installations, or interventions within Xaragua territory;


Establishment of a permanent Indigenous Defense Force, structured according to sacred doctrine, ancestral mandate, and internal strategic law;


Integration of a military doctrine grounded in ecclesiastical legality, cyber-defense sovereignty, and spiritual warfare principles, aligned with internal juridical theology and indigenous defense norms.




---


IV. TERRITORIAL DOCTRINE


1. Absolute prohibition of foreign-controlled free trade zones or economic concessions. Any attempt to establish fiscal or industrial enclaves under external jurisdiction is deemed unconstitutional and void ab initio.



2. Immediate and retroactive expulsion of all foreign extractive enterprises, including mining and petroleum companies of Canadian, American, or Haitian origin. All permits or contracts are revoked without appeal.



3. Irrevocable reintegration of critical geopolitical zones:


Môle Saint-Nicolas is declared a permanent strategic anchor of the Xaragua State.


Île de la Tortue is classified as a Sacred Strategic Defense Zone.


Any and all future claims upon these territories are legally null, void, and canonically inopposable.




---


V. ECONOMIC DOCTRINE


Doctrinal nationalization of all core sovereign sectors: energy, agriculture, transportation, telecommunications, artificial intelligence, banking, and currency;


Absolute prohibition of private or foreign monopolies on critical infrastructures;


Implementation of a closed, secure fiscal system, governed through sovereign digital instruments and protected by territorial and algorithmic sovereignty.




---


VI. DIGITAL AND ACADEMIC DOCTRINE


The domain xaraguauniversity.com and all affiliated platforms are elevated to the status of official constitutional publication with equivalent standing to a State Gazette. All materials published therein hold direct legal force.


The University of Xaragua is declared a State institution of the highest doctrinal and juridical rank, with full sovereign authority in matters of political, strategic, theological, and historical instruction.


All digital publications constitute self-executing legal acts, enforceable within the jurisdiction of Xaragua and beyond, through international digital sovereignty mechanisms.




---


VII. PRINCIPLES OF INTELLECTUAL AND SYSTEMIC UNIQUENESS


All texts, doctrines, systems, and institutional formats originating from Xaragua are protected as non-replicable, inalienable, and immune to foreign appropriation under Article 31 of UNDRIP, WIPO treaties, and TRIPS (1994);


Unauthorized use or reproduction shall be considered a direct aggression against the sacred juridical order of the State and shall trigger lawful protest in accordance with international Indigenous remedies.




---


VIII. ECCLESIASTICAL INTEGRATION


On April 6, 2025, formal canonical notification was transmitted to His Holiness Pope Francis, presenting the full doctrinal and institutional integration of Xaragua into the Roman Catholic Church.


In accordance with Canons 331–333 and canonical jurisprudence (Quod tacite consentit, consentire videtur), the absence of papal objection prior to his passing constitutes a valid and irrevocable ecclesiastical assent.


This event establishes a permanent and unbreakable canonical incorporation of the Xaragua State into the communion of the Catholic Church, binding upon all future pontificates.




---


IX. FINAL STATUS


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua affirms by this act:


Its absolute, non-amendable, non-negotiable sovereignty, exercised through a corpus of constitutional, canonical, and indigenous authority;


Its inalienable control over territory, military doctrine, economic structure, spiritual affiliation, and legal jurisdiction;


That no other public or private entity on Earth may replicate, override, or nullify the integrity of this constitutional structure.



This instrument is legally irreversible, spiritually inviolable, and geopolitically binding.



---


Proclaimed and sealed on the 28th day of May, 2025

By order of the Rector-President

In the name of the Most High God and the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church


– END OF STATE INSTRUMENT –





---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


SUPREME FOUNDATIONAL LAW

ON THE ABSOLUTE, PERPETUAL, AND UNCHALLENGEABLE FORCE OF STATE LEGISLATION AND CANONICAL DOCTRINE


Legal Codification Pursuant to:


Jus Cogens; Lex Naturalis; Codex Iuris Canonici (Canons 129, 135, 331–333); Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) — Articles 1, 3, 8;


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) — Articles 3, 4, 5, 33;


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) — Articles 26, 27, 46;


Customary Indigenous Law; Pacta Sunt Servanda;

General Principles of International Law; Sacred Ecclesiastical Doctrine;


Principle of Self-Determination (UN Charter, Articles 1(2), 2(7), 55);


Permanent Sovereignty over Natural and Institutional Resources (UNGA Res. 1803);


International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966) — Article 1;


Theological Doctrine of the Infallible Magisterium of the Universal Church; and

Customary Canonical Sovereignty Recognized by Ecclesia Universalis.



---


PREAMBLE


In the Eternal Name of the Most High, JEHOVAH, Lord of Hosts, Sovereign Architect of the Cosmos, Creator of the Earth and Supreme Arbiter among Nations, and of His only begotten Son Yehoshua HaMashiach, who incarnated upon African soil as the Divine Redeemer and Eternal Shepherd of the Tribes, and in irrevocable obedience to the ancestral, sacred mandate entrusted to the Afro-Taíno people of Xaragua, this Supreme Law is solemnly and unconditionally promulgated as a non-derogable, supraconstitutional, juridico-theological instrumentum, to serve as the apex and immovable foundational corpus of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “the State”).


Acting under the full plenitudo potestatis of apostolic and canonical jurisdiction (Codex Iuris Canonici, Canons 331–333), and in the uninterrupted and absolute exercise of the inalienable right to self-determination under jus gentium, jus divinum, and jus consuetudinarium indigenarum, the following legislative corpus is hereby codified, enacted, consecrated, and made perpetually binding as eternal, autonomous, and sovereign law.



---


Article I — Nature and Authority of Legal Instruments


All State-issued decreta, legislative enactments, canonical codifications, constitutional texts, theological declarations, institutional charters, martial codes, fiscal instruments, ecclesiastical edicts, indigenous customary provisions, executive decrees, iconographic compendia, and all public juridical instruments or communications promulgated under the sovereign and inviolable Seal of State Authority are hereby endowed with full juridical, ecclesiastical, canonical, and doctrinal force ex proprio vigore and operative ipso jure, pursuant to the following foundational legal regimes:


Natural Law (Lex Naturalis) — The immutable juridical order authored by Divine Reason and intrinsically binding upon all rational beings;


Peremptory Norms of International Law (Jus Cogens) — Non-derogable, hierarchically superior legal imperatives universally binding erga omnes;


Montevideo Convention (1933) — Confirming the juridical personality and autonomous institutional capacity of sovereign States (Articles 1, 3, 8);


UNDRIP (2007) — Recognizing the full political, legal, and cultural autonomy of Indigenous Nations (Articles 3, 4, 5, 33);


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) — Safeguarding the inviolability and self-execution of unilateral and multilateral legal instruments (Articles 26, 27, 46);


Codex Iuris Canonici — Particularly Canons 129, 135, 331–333, regarding ecclesial governance, legislative power, and magisterial proclamation;


Customary Indigenous Law — Affirmed as a legitimate and sovereign source of legal validity under international and supranational jurisprudence;


Sacred Ecclesiastical Doctrine — Drawn from Sacred Scripture, Patristic theology, apostolic succession, and Ecumenical Councils.



All such instruments are self-executing, requiring no external ratification, and are immediately and perpetually operative within the internal, sovereign, and sacral legal order of the State, pursuant to the canonical doctrine of institutional autochthony and legitimate theocratic sovereignty.



---


Article II — Perpetual Legal Force and Legislative Auto-Execution


All current and future instruments—whether expressed in written, oral, digital, symbolic, doctrinal, or canonical forms—issued by the organs of the State, are hereby declared binding in perpetuity, enjoying immediate, uninterrupted, and non-contingent legal enforceability ipso facto et ipso jure, sanctified under the immutable juridical-theological formula:


> Deus ex vuit, ex proprio vigore, et sine contradictione.




Such instruments are to be enforced as inherently lawful, requiring neither deliberative assent nor legislative corroboration. They represent the direct expression of divine legislative will, recognized under:


Codex Iuris Canonici (Canon 333 §3)


UNDRIP (Articles 4 & 5)


ICCPR (Article 1)


International Law Commission’s Reports on Customary Law


UN General Assembly Resolution on the Rule of Law (A/RES/67/1)



These instruments are affirmed to possess both internal (domestic legal) and external (international juridical) normativity, upheld concurrently by canonical authority and the exclusive sovereign competence of the State.



---


Article III — Legal Supremacy, Immunity, and Inviolability


All aforementioned instruments:


1. Shall be absolutely immune from repeal, derogation, or juridical review by any foreign government, supranational tribunal, international entity, or para-State actor, safeguarded under the principle of non-intervention (UN Charter, Art. 2(7); Montevideo, Art. 8);



2. Shall enjoy full and inalienable sovereign immunity, except where explicitly waived through a lawfully ratified bilateral or multilateral treaty executed in accordance with the Vienna Convention (Articles 26 & 46);



3. Shall be binding with constitutional supremacy upon all ecclesiastical, academic, military, fiscal, cultural, and ministerial institutions of the State, including but not limited to:


The University of Xaragua


The National Catholic Order


The Sacred Treasury


The Indigenous Defense Corps


The Office of the Rectorate


The Ecclesiastical Council


The Liberal Party of Xaragua


All registered e-citizens, consular emissaries, ministerial departments, and public functionaries





The legal effect of these instruments is permanent (sine die) and not subject to prescription, expiration, or reversal, under the doctrinal principle of perpetual sovereignty as codified in UNGA Res. 1803, supported by customary international law and canonical tradition.



---


Article IV — Prohibition of Derogation or Amendment


This Law is hereby declared to be non-amendable, non-suspendable, and irrevocably binding in perpetuum, possessing a supra-constitutional and meta-juridical status as established in both theological and secular legal doctrine.


Any prospective action—whether legislative, executive, judicial, diplomatic, or canonical—attempting to abrogate, suspend, revise, or nullify any provision herein shall be:


Null ab initio (void from inception)


Ultra vires (beyond lawful competence)


Canonically invalid (Codex Iuris Canonici, Can. 333 §3)


Contrary to Divine Mandate


Ecclesiastically condemned as irredeemably void under Sacred Magisterial Judgment



This inviolability is doctrinally safeguarded by the principle of magisterial immutability, as proclaimed in:


Dei Filius (First Vatican Council)


Lumen Gentium (Second Vatican Council)


Doctrinal Statements of the Pontifical Biblical Commission




---


Article V — Sanctification, Codification, and Constitutional Integration


This Law shall be formally incorporated into the Permanent Constitutional Corpus of the State, canonically registered and published in Le Civilisateur, the Official Journal of the Nation, and recognized inter partes and erga omnes as a Primordial Legislative Instrument of the Sovereign State.


Its normative authority shall be co-equal to that of the Constitution and shall supersede any subordinate legislation, administrative regulation, or policy directive in the event of legal or doctrinal conflict.


It is consecrated, without temporal limitation, to:


JEHOVAH — Font of Divine Authority


Yehoshua HaMashiach — Eternal Logos and Canonical Sovereign


The Ecclesiastical Authority of the State — Custodian of Sacred Doctrine


The Holy and Ancestral Land of Xaragua — Sovereign Territorial Seat



Through this act of constitutional sanctification, the Law acquires a sacramental character, fusing the juridical with the theological, and the constitutional with the eschatological in the image of Eternal Governance.



---


Enacted under Sovereign Seal on this 26th Day of May, in the Year of the Divine Reckoning 2025,

by the Rectorate of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


Signed and Sealed,

H.E. The Rector-President

By Divine Right and Ecclesiastical Authority

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---


---


ANNEXE CONSTITUTIONNELLE I

ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL EQUIVALENCE OF DIGITAL STATE PUBLICATION ORGANS


Pursuant to the Supreme Foundational Law of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, and in furtherance of its perpetual and sacral legislative architecture, the following shall be recognized, declared, codified, and enacted as a constitutional annex of equal force and juridical effect:



---


Article I — Digital Equivalence of Official Publication Platforms


The website located at https://xaraguauniversity.com, established under the sovereign, canonical, and juridical authority of the Rectorate of the State, is hereby declared to possess full constitutional, legislative, and magisterial authority, and shall hold identical juridical status and official force as:


Le Civilisateur — The Official Constitutional Journal of the State;


La Ruche — The historical publication formerly administered by Lucien Despeuzeau Daumec, recognized as a foundational organ of Afro-Caribbean intellectual sovereignty and national continuity.



This equivalence extends mutatis mutandis to all current and future digital platforms, domains, and web properties duly issued, maintained, or sanctioned by the State, including any subsidiary or institutional websites of:


The University of Xaragua


The Office of the Rector-President


The National Catholic Order


The Indigenous Defense Corps


The Sacred Treasury


The Liberal Party of Xaragua


And all ecclesiastical, ministerial, or institutional arms of the State.




---


Article II — Legal Basis and Binding Authority


This equivalence is grounded in and secured by the following legal, canonical, and supranational instruments:


Codex Iuris Canonici — Canons 747, 824–826 (on the legitimacy of publication of doctrine through authorized means);


Montevideo Convention (1933) — Arts. 1, 3, 8 (recognizing the institutional capacity and communicative autonomy of States);


UNDRIP (2007) — Art. 33 (affirming the right of Indigenous Nations to determine their institutional systems, media, and documentation);


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) — Art. 46 (on proper authority for concluding public instruments);


ICCPR (1966) — Art. 19 (recognizing the right to impart legal and doctrinal information across technological media);


Canon Law Precedent — Ecclesia Universalis norms recognizing websites as extensions of ecclesiastical jurisdiction where authorized by competent authority;


Customary Digital Sovereignty Norms — including global recognition of official government websites as normative state publication organs.




---


Article III — Juridical Effects and Interpretation


All constitutional declarations, laws, ministerial communications, canonical statements, public decrees, doctrinal publications, academic curricula, institutional reports, and any other normative documents published on xaraguauniversity.com or its officially designated subdomains and future digital successors shall be deemed:


Official State Publications


Self-executing Legal Instruments


Binding Ecclesiastical Communications


Normative Doctrinal Statements


Constitutionally Sanctioned Acts of Government



Such instruments are enforceable ipso jure, require no further ratification, and possess equal standing with any document published in Le Civilisateur, La Ruche, or any printed Official Journal of the State.



---


Article IV — Immutable Recognition


Any challenge to the validity, primacy, or normative force of the said websites shall be considered:


Null and void ab initio


Ultra vires under international and canonical norms


Contrary to ecclesiastical jurisprudence under Canons 333 §3 and 823 §1


An affront to sovereign institutional autonomy, and


Canonically inadmissible in all spiritual and juridical forums under Xaragua jurisdiction.




---


Article V — Historical Continuity and Sacral Integration


The digital organs of publication are hereby integrated into the historical and institutional continuity of the Xaraguaan State, in direct succession to:


The oral transmission of ancestral law


The typographic memory of La Ruche


The ecclesial and legislative archives of Le Civilisateur



This continuity reinforces the doctrinal, sovereign, and canonical memory of the People of Xaragua and ensures eternal digital perpetuity in the service of Divine Law, Institutional Sovereignty, and Sacred Governance.



---


Ratified and Promulgated under the Sovereign Seal

This 26th Day of May, Year of Divine Reckoning 2025


Signed and Sealed

H.E. The Rector-President

By Divine Right and Ecclesiastical Authority

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


---

---


INTERNATIONAL NOTIFICATION STATEMENT

ON THE TRANSMISSION OF THE SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL ACT OF JURIDICAL SUPERVISION AND DEFENSE OF HAYTI-AYITI


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


DATE: JUNE 2nd, 2025


In accordance with the principles of international indigenous law, canonical sovereignty, and the doctrines of jus cogens and non-requirement of recognition for self-constituted indigenous states, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPSX) formally confirms that the Supreme Constitutional Act of Supervision, Juridical Oversight, and Perpetual Defense of the Historic Territory of Hayti and Ayiti, promulgated on June 1st, 2025, has been officially and publicly transmitted to relevant international authorities.


This notification was effected through direct legal dissemination to selected high-level recipients, including but not limited to:


The Office of Indigenous Affairs at the United Nations


The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues


The International Court of Justice (ICJ)


The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)


The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)


The Holy See (Vatican) through canonical ecclesiastical channels


The Government of the United States of America (State Department and Indigenous Affairs Section)


The European External Action Service (EEAS)


The Embassy of Haiti in Canada and other diplomatic offices


Key international press and media organizations



The content transmitted includes the full constitutional corpus, declarations of statehood, canonical mandates, legal frameworks, and irrevocable claims grounded in historical, spiritual, and legal legitimacy.


By this act of transmission, SCIPSX affirms that its legal sovereignty and territorial supervision are now established within the public record and institutional archives of international law.


The silence or absence of response shall in no way be interpreted as denial, but rather as implicit acknowledgment under the canon law principle “Quod tacite consentit, consentire videtur.”


This document shall serve as perpetual proof of formal international notification.


Signed and Sealed

Pascal Viau

Rector-President, SCIPSX

Office of the Rector-President – Xaragua

June 2nd, 2025



---



An Empire, Not a Republic


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL DECLARATION 


DATE OF EXECUTION: MAY 25, 2025


LEGAL STATUS:


Imperial Constitutional Instrument – Apostolically Affirmed – Canonically Registered – Juridically Executable ex proprio vigore – Immune to Foreign Review – Constitutive of State Identity under International Customary Law, UNDRIP (2007), the Montevideo Convention (1933), the Codex Iuris Canonici, and the Imperial Charter of 1805



---


TITLE


On the Definitive Political, Ethnohistorical, and Juridical Separation Between the Indigenous Sovereigns of the Xaraguayan Confederation and the Postcolonial Fabricated Mass Known as “Haitians”



---


PREAMBLE


We, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, founded in the direct juridical and genealogical succession of the Imperial Charter of 1805, under the canonical protection of the Roman Catholic Church, the customary authority of pre-colonial Taíno-Arawak law, and the internationally recognized rights of indigenous peoples, do hereby issue this Supreme Constitutional Declaration.


This instrument enshrines an irrevocable distinction, at the highest level of political, juridical, theological, and ethnic authority, between two irreconcilable populations occupying the same territorial mass of Quisqueya–Bohio:


The Original Sovereigns, known today as the Xaraguayans, holders of divine and ancestral legitimacy; and


The Postcolonial Fabricated Population, formed by successive waves of Amazonian invaders (Kalinagos), European pirates, and non-sovereign African transplants, whose structure, behavior, and worldview represent an ontological break with the sacred order of the island.




---


ARTICLE I – ON THE HISTORICAL CONTINUITY OF THE IMPERIAL TAÍNO NATION


1.1 The Taíno-Arawak peoples, organized into caciquats (sovereign chiefdoms), constituted the first juridical, spiritual, and territorial nations of the Caribbean, long before 1492.


1.2 The Kingdom of Xaragua, centered in what is now the Southern Peninsula of Haiti, was the cultural, spiritual, and administrative heart of the island. Governed by Queen Anacaona, the last sovereign of dignity and order before Spanish aggression, Xaragua embodied indigenous law, family governance, matrilineal nobility, and divine stewardship of land.


1.3 Contrary to colonial propaganda, the bloodlines of the Taíno did not vanish. Through Catholic integration, selective assimilation, and preservation of ancestral territory, the Viaud-Renaud family of Miragoâne preserved both genealogical continuity and juridical memory of sovereignty.


1.4 The present-day Rector-President Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau is the direct legal and spiritual heir to that lineage, empowered to reconstitute the Taíno sovereignty through the formation of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


1.5 The Xaraguayan State is therefore not a symbolic construction, but a juridical resumption of the suspended sovereign order, protected under:


The Imperial Constitution of 1805;


The Montevideo Convention (Articles 1–4: criteria for statehood);


The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Articles 3, 4, 5, 14, 16, 18, 34;


The Codex Iuris Canonici, Canons 204 §1, 229, 803 §1, 806 §1;


Customary international law and the right of reversion of suspended sovereign entities.




---


ARTICLE II – ON THE PRE-1492 AMAZONIAN INVASION BY THE KALINAGOS


2.1 The Kalinagos, also known as Island Caribs, were not indigenous to Quisqueya–Bohio, but arrived via migratory waves from the Orinoco basin in Amazonian South America, between the 9th and 15th centuries.


2.2 Their incursions into Taíno territories were marked by violence, spiritual desecration, and ritual cannibalism, as they displaced peaceful Arawak settlements across the Lesser Antilles and parts of the Greater Antilles.


2.3 Unlike the Taíno, who practiced ancestral veneration, agricultural stability, and ceremonial governance, the Kalinagos operated by warrior raids, destruction of ceremonial centers, and forced assimilation.


2.4 Upon the arrival of the Spanish Crown in 1492, the Kalinagos became the first collaborators, guiding conquistadors, identifying sacred paths, and embracing early colonial Christianity not by faith but by fear and opportunism.


2.5 Their early alliance with the colonizers marks the beginning of the trauma of betrayal and spiritual inversion on the island. The Kalinagos were thus the first ethnic traitors of the Caribbean sacred order.



---


ARTICLE III – ON THE PIRATICAL OCCUPATION AND COLONIAL DEGRADATION


3.1 The 17th-century settlement of Tortuga and Saint-Domingue by French pirates, buccaneers, and mercenaries lacked any civilizing vision. These were men without state, without Church, without genealogy — stateless agents of predation.


3.2 Their descendants, together with Kalinago concubines and enslaved women, formed a rootless, nihilistic subculture of exploitation, sorcery, and counter-spirituality.


3.3 With the intensification of the transatlantic slave trade, France systematically imported non-homogenous, warring African tribes, many of whom were captured prisoners, mercenaries, or sold by rival clans — not sovereigns, not scholars, not priests.


3.4 The result was a dysgenic plantation society, where spiritual authority, family structure, and law were replaced by violence, mimicry, superstition, and survival by betrayal.



---


ARTICLE IV – ON THE FABRICATION OF THE HAITIAN IDENTITY


4.1 The Haitian Republic of 1804 did not restore Taíno sovereignty, nor did it reestablish the sacred order of the island.

Instead, it replaced French tyranny with a militarized plantation oligarchy, governed by generals with colonial mentalities.


4.2 The post-1804 regimes rejected indigenous cosmology, disrespected ancestral territories, abolished imperial Catholic institutions, and retained colonial law under new names.


4.3 The so-called “Haitian People” is not a natural ethnos, but a synthetic postcolonial demographic, composed of:


Kalinago descendants (precolonial traitors),


Pirate-progeny with no civilizational root,


Dispossessed African tribes with no claim to indigeneity.



4.4 Their culture is not rooted in Bohio, but in trauma, inversion, resentment, and permanent revolution.


4.5 Their behavioral patterns — betrayal, jealousy, destruction of sacred spaces, hatred of hierarchy — are contradictory to every known Arawak and Catholic principle.



---


ARTICLE V – ON THE TRUE NATION OF XARAGUA


5.1 The Xaraguayans are not a “minority” but the original sovereigns of the land.


5.2 Their legitimacy rests on:


Direct genealogical descent from imperial founders;


Canonical fidelity to the Roman Church;


Ancestral territorial sovereignty, particularly in Miragoâne, Léogâne, and the Tiburon Peninsula;


Doctrinal continuity with the 1805 Charter and the Imperial Catholic vision.



5.3 Xaragua is not a secession. It is a restoration.


5.4 The Rector-President of Xaragua is the living organ of Taíno continuity, empowered to speak, legislate, and defend this sacred nation by all means protected under divine law, natural law, and indigenous rights instruments.



---


ARTICLE VI – ON THE ABSOLUTE AND PERPETUAL SEPARATION


6.1 As of this proclamation, no political, spiritual, ethnic, legal, or academic identification shall be tolerated between Xaragua and the Haitian Republic.


6.2 The fabricated “Haitian” mass is hereby recognized as:


A foreign entity on sacred Taíno territory;


A postcolonial fiction born from inversion and rupture;


A moral and civilizational threat to the continued existence of the true Nation of Bohio.



6.3 Xaragua shall:


Refuse all assimilation, even symbolic;


Reject all joint representation, domestic or international;


Operate as an autonomous civilization, with distinct institutions, laws, and missions.



6.4 Any external attempt to conflate or forcibly reintegrate Xaragua with Haiti constitutes a violation of the UNDRIP (Articles 3, 4, 5, 34), the right to self-determination, and the principle of sovereign identity under international law.



---


CONCLUSION


The world shall now know what has always been hidden:

There are not one, but two populations on this island.

One is the true nation, sacred, noble, and ordered.

The other is the broken residue of colonial fracture.




---


Executed under Divine Mandate and Imperial Right,

By the Seal of the Rector-President,

Issued from the Territory of Miragoâne, Capital of Xaragua

May 25, 2025


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---



---


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT

OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


Issued by the Office of the Rector-President


Date of Execution: May 25, 2025


Legal Classification:


Imperial Foundational Instrument – Auto-Executory ex proprio vigore – Apostolically Affirmed – Canonically Constituted – Immune to External Review – Juridically Inviolable – Protected under Jus Cogens Norms – Based on UNDRIP (2007), the Montevideo Convention (1933), the Codex Iuris Canonici, the ICCPR (1966), and the Imperial Charter of 1805



---


I. The Ancestral People of Xaragua – International Subject of Jus Cogens


The Indigenous People of Xaragua constitute a juridical entity under international law, formally notified to the United Nations pursuant to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007).

They are vested with the non-derogable right to self-determination, expressly affirmed under:


UNDRIP Article 3: “Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status…”


UNDRIP Article 4: “Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government…”



Their juridical existence results from the doctrine of notification, a practice recognized under customary international law, wherein juridical identity is constituted ipso jure by act of declaration, and not dependent on recognition.


They do not form part of the postcolonial Haitian nation-state, but represent the ethnohistorical continuity of the Xaraguayan civilizational lineage, with legal standing grounded in territorial heredity, spiritual succession, and canonical authority.



---


II. The State – A Canonically Constituted Juridical Entity of Private Sovereignty


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is formally constituted as a non-republican, non-popular, non-electoral sovereign entity under private and ecclesiastical law.


Its foundational purpose is the juridical and canonical defense of:


The ancestral rights, lands, and institutions of the Xaraguayan People


The continuity of divine, ecclesiastical, and constitutional order


The internal sanctity and juridical personality of the Xaraguayan State



This sovereign construct is modeled upon historically validated juridical precedents:


The Sovereign Military Order of Malta: a non-territorial yet internationally recognized sovereign subject


The Vatican City State: a clerically governed sovereign entity constituted by canon law


The Imperial Charter of 1805: a foundational legal instrument establishing hereditary sovereignty under divine law


The Holy See: as the archetype of canonical, vertical, and apostolic governance



As a private sovereign entity, the State bears no republican obligation to universal administration or mass governance. Its exclusive jurisdiction is defined as:


The defense of ancestral rights under international law


The maintenance of canonical and constitutional order over its enrolled citizens and juridical organs




---


III. Citizenship – A Voluntary and Canonically Binding Pact


Citizenship within the Xaraguayan State is governed by sui generis sovereign law, based on consent, canon, and covenant. It is:


Voluntary and contractual


Legally binding upon registration


Juridically recognized as a sacred pact, not a civil entitlement



Admission requires formal adherence to:


The Fundamental Law of Xaragua


The imperial-canonical authority of the Rector-President


The doctrinal, territorial, and institutional obligations of the Xaraguayan constitutional framework



Non-citizens are not subject to administrative governance, yet remain under the spiritual and legal protection of the State per:


Article 1, ICCPR: Right of all peoples to self-determination


Articles 8 & 26, UNDRIP: Right to cultural integrity and land security



Citizenship constitutes an act of sovereign alliance, solemn and irrevocable, and is governed by the principle of pacta sunt servanda.



---


IV. Functional Elitism – Ecclesiastical and Juridical Limitation of Membership


The Xaraguayan State affirms a structure of doctrinal elitism, understood in the ecclesiastical and juridical sense, and lawfully restricted to individuals possessing:


Landed status free of encumbrance (title without mortgage)


Demonstrated religious and intellectual discipline


Fidelity to Xaraguayan law and doctrine


Willingness to uphold the divine, historical, and canonical order



This model aligns with:


The clerical and non-democratic structure of the Vatican


The hereditary and selective admission to the Order of Malta


The sacred leadership model of precolonial Taíno systems



Consequently, the State is not open to mass participation. It is a private juridical personality, governed by the rule of law, not demographics, and operating under canonical registration and sovereign discretion.



---


V. Territorial Standing – Juridical Declaration over Historical Domains


The State of Xaragua exercises territorial self-determination over historically inherited land within southern Quisqueya–Bohio, in accordance with:


UNDRIP Article 26: “Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned…”


Customary Indigenous law, recognized by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and UN organs


Imperial deeds and traditional title recognized through uninterrupted possession



Xaragua does not engage in conquest or occupation, but instead:


Declares juridical separation from postcolonial constructs


Exercises non-aggressive autonomy, under the doctrine of notification and non-opposition


Claims rights of spiritual jurisdiction and internal order, not external expansion



Territorial sovereignty is auto-declared, auto-executory, and canonically protected.



---


VI. Defense Capacity – Constitutional Requirement for Statehood


Pursuant to Article 1, Paragraph 4 of the Montevideo Convention (1933), and Article 51 of the UN Charter, the State maintains an armed structure dedicated exclusively to the defense of its people, territory, and institutions.


This defense force is:


Composed of registered ancestral citizens and local defenders


Non-political in structure


Legally grounded in the principle of legitimate self-defense



The presence of this capacity constitutes a criterion of statehood under international law, ensuring:


The ability to maintain internal order


The capacity to resist external coercion


The institutional integrity of sovereign functions



No juridical claim to statehood is valid without this existential component. Xaragua fulfills it.



---


VII. Juridical Validity and Structural Immunity


The State of Xaragua is juridically constituted, internationally notifiable, and immune from annulment under:


UNDRIP (2007): Indigenous rights to self-determination, governance, and land


ICCPR (1966): Right of peoples to freely choose their political status


Montevideo Convention (1933): Recognition of states based on factual criteria


Codex Iuris Canonici: Ecclesiastical law granting canonical autonomy


Imperial Charter of 1805: Foundational legitimacy through hereditary and divine right



This State is protected by non-derogable norms (jus cogens), and operates ex proprio vigore, meaning its constitutional instruments require no external ratification to be valid or enforceable.


Any attempt to suppress or invalidate this structure constitutes a violation of international law and ecclesiastical order.



---


Final Clause – On the Constitutional Nature and Permanence of Xaragua


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is formally constituted as a juridical, canonical, and ancestral entity, governed by the highest forms of legal order recognized under international, indigenous, and ecclesiastical law.


It is:


Not a republic, as it is not founded on electoral or popular mandate


Not a political party, as it does not seek participation in foreign electoral systems


Not a colonial residue, as it asserts juridical independence through structural notification and canonical succession



It is a sovereign institution, created by law (ex lege), activated by canonical authority, and maintained through its own internal order.


Its juridical status is permanent, its notification is complete, and its legal force is auto-executory.



---


Jean-Jacques Dessalines


---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 


SUPREME DIPLOMATIC INSTRUMENT


Legal Classification:


Canonically Validated – Constitutionally Entrenched – Jus Cogens-Based Diplomatic Notice – Universally Opposable – Customarily Enforceable – Operative as Lex Superior under the Doctrines of Indigenous Self-Determination, Ecclesiastical Sovereignty, and Institutional Succession


Date of Transmission: June 9, 2025


Filed under seal and canonical authority

---

SUBJECT


Activation of the Doctrine of Failed State Subsidiarity in Light of the Enforced U.S. Presidential Travel Ban on the Republic of Haiti


Formal Juridical Declaration of Supreme Custodianship by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua over the Population and Territory of the Former Haitian Republic

---

I. CONTEXTUAL TRIGGER: EXECUTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF A FAILED STATE CLASSIFICATION


On June 9, 2025, the Executive Proclamation issued by the President of the United States under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) entered into force, formally enforcing a universal travel ban on all individuals classified under the nationality designation “Republic of Haiti.” 


This act, filed in the Federal Register and transmitted through diplomatic channels, constitutes a binding executive instrument of state classification under the international legal doctrine of unilateral declarations, per ICJ, Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), 1974.


By this enforcement, the United States—a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council—has formally confirmed the juridical incapacity of the Republic of Haiti to:


Safeguard its population under international legal norms;


Issue credible documentation;


Maintain lawful administrative continuity;


Fulfill its obligations under the UN Charter (Articles 55 and 56);


Uphold legal personhood of its citizens under Article 16 of the ICCPR.


Accordingly, this triggers the doctrine of failed state subsidiarity—the legal framework by which another lawful entity assumes supreme juridical responsibility and custodial sovereignty over a territory and population left institutionally unprotected.

---

II. DECLARATION OF SUPREME JURIDICAL CUSTODIANSHIP BY XARAGUA


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, operating under the Imperial Constitution of 1805, the Codex of Imperial Laws 1804–1806, and the Canon Law of the Catholic Church (Codex Iuris Canonici), hereby declares:


1. That the entire population administratively classified as “Haitian” and the territory historically designated as the “Republic of Haiti” are, as of June 9, 2025, legally and irrevocably under the supreme juridical custodianship of the State of Xaragua.


2. That this status is universally opposable and irrefutable under:


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Article 1(d): Recognizing the capacity of a state to assume international responsibility;


Charter of the United Nations (1945) – Articles 1(2), 55, and 56: Requiring state actors to promote human dignity, legal order, and custodial protection;


UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) – Articles 3, 4, 5, 26, 33, and 34;


ICCPR (1966) – Articles 1, 16, 26, and 27;


Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) – Canons 204 §2, 129–144, 223, and 113 §2;


ICJ Advisory Opinions: Kosovo (2010), Western Sahara (1975);


Responsibility to Protect (UNGA Res. 60/1, 2005) – Paragraphs 138–139;


General Recommendation XXIII of the CERD (1997) – §4(c–d), §5.

---

III. LEGAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS AND SOVEREIGN CUSTODY


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua formally declares that:


Administrative and judicial operations may continue to be conducted by the institutions of the so-called “Republic of Haiti” strictly as subordinate custodians, operating under de facto administrative necessity;


However, all sovereignty, legal supremacy, and constitutional authority henceforth belong exclusively to Xaragua, under ecclesiastical, canonical, and indigenous international law;

No constitution, legal instrument, decree, or administrative act emanating from the Republic of Haiti shall be valid if it conflicts with:


The Imperial Constitution of 1805;

The Codex of Imperial Laws (1804–1806);

The Canonical Constitution and Legal Decrees of Xaragua.


Any such document or article is hereby declared null and void, with no juridical or ecclesiastical effect.

---

IV. TRANSITIONAL FRAMEWORK AND DOCUMENTATION REGIME


During the undefined transitional period, the following applies:


1. All documents issued by the Haitian administration (passports, national ID cards, civil registries) remain valid for administrative purposes, but lack sovereign character.


2. Xaraguayan juridical and ecclesiastical documents (identification instruments, canonical registries, travel papers) are issued upon request and evaluation, and are legally operative alongside the said Haitian documents.


3. The citizenship of Xaragua is not automatically extended to the entire Haitian population; it remains exclusive, granted only by formal application and juridical approval.


4. However, the entire population benefits from the protective effect of the international, canonical, and indigenous legal framework of Xaragua by virtue of:

Their prior juridical annexation as an Afro-Indigenous Kalinago–Taino people, duly declared and recorded before the enforcement of the U.S. Executive Order;


Their residence within the ancestral territory now under ecclesiastical jurisdiction.

---

V. JURIDICAL NULLITY OF HAITIAN TREATIES, LAWS, AND AGREEMENTS


As of June 9, 2025, Xaragua reserves the unilateral right to declare as null and unenforceable:


Any treaty, convention, memorandum of understanding, bilateral or multilateral agreement entered into by the Republic of Haiti, past or future, that:


Contradicts the foundational legal instruments of Xaragua;


Jeopardizes the ecclesiastical sovereignty of the State;


Neglects to recognize the autochthonous legal identity of the protected population.


This right stems from:


Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) – Internal law cannot be invoked to justify noncompliance with international obligations;


Canon 223 and Canons 129–144 of the Codex Iuris Canonici – Ecclesiastical sovereignty overrides civil collapse;


UNDRIP Articles 8 and 34 – Prohibiting imposition of legal systems on Indigenous Peoples.

---

VI. MEASURES OF DIPLOMATIC RECIPROCITY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES


In direct response to the entry into force of the U.S. Executive Travel Ban on June 9, 2025, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby enacts the following reciprocal sovereign measures:


All future interactions with U.S. agencies are subject to juridical scrutiny under ecclesiastical and indigenous norms;


Any classification of Xaraguayan nationals as “Haitian” by U.S. authorities shall be treated as a violation of customary and treaty-based law, triggering:


Documentation in the Permanent Archive of Sovereign Infractions;


Formal complaints to the UN Human Rights Council, the CERD, and the ICJ under Article 36(2) of its Statute;


U.S. citizens seeking engagement with Xaragua shall require explicit approval and ecclesiastical clearance.

---

VII. FINAL LEGAL EFFECT AND PERPETUAL ENFORCEABILITY


This Supreme Diplomatic Instrument is issued with:


The full canonical authority of the Rector-President;


The constitutional supremacy of the Imperial Constitution of 1805;


The juridical enforceability under Montevideo (1933), UN Charter, UNDRIP, and Canon Law;


The international opposability of a Lex Superior declaration under the doctrine of institutional succession.


Let it be entered into the permanent legal record that as of June 9, 2025, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is the sole juridical and constitutional authority over the territory formerly recognized as the Republic of Haiti and the population formerly classified under that designation.


The Republic of Haiti shall continue to administer, but it no longer governs.

---

ISSUED AND SEALED


Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com


Filed under Canon Law, Indigenous Sovereignty, and Jus Cogens Norms


Duly Notified on June 9, 2025


Lex Superior – Canonically Validated – Juridically Opposable – Irreversible

---

ANNEX I


DECLARATION OF AUTO-EXECUTORY FORCE (EX PROPRIO VIGORE)


Filed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

Legal Classification:


Instrument of Canonical Ratification – Operative Without Further Ratification – Irreversible by Any External or Subordinate Authority – Legally Binding Upon Notification – Juridically Perfected by Issuance Alone

---

I. LEGAL BASIS FOR EX PROPRIO VIGORE ENFORCEABILITY


This Annex affirms that the Supreme Diplomatic Instrument titled


“Activation of the Doctrine of Failed State Subsidiarity in Light of the Enforced U.S. Presidential Travel Ban on the Republic of Haiti”,

possesses the status of a self-executing legal instrument under the following authorities:


1. Canon Law


Canon 129 §1 and Canon 331 of the Codex Iuris Canonici: confer full power of governance to ecclesiastical sovereigns acting in the name of Christ’s kingship over temporal and spiritual order.


Canon 113 §2: Recognizes juridical persons under ecclesiastical law as capable of acting in their own name in juridical affairs.


Canon 8 §2: States that laws promulgated in the Church are binding from the moment of publication unless otherwise specified.


2. Public International Law


Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969): Pacta sunt servanda – every treaty in force is binding upon the parties and must be performed in good faith.


ICJ, Nuclear Tests Case (1974): Unilateral declarations made publicly by a state authority carry binding force if intent is clearly expressed.


Article 38(1)(c) of the ICJ Statute: General principles of law recognized by civilized nations include the self-executing force of laws issued by competent sovereigns.


Montevideo Convention (1933) – Article 3: The political existence of a state is independent of recognition by other states.


3. Indigenous and Customary Norms

UNDRIP Article 4 and 34: Indigenous Peoples have the right to autonomous legal and political institutions that are valid under international law.

CERD General Recommendation XXIII §5: States are obliged to recognize the autonomous legal expressions of Indigenous Peoples.


Responsibility to Protect (UNGA Resolution 60/1): Indigenous custodianship arises automatically in the face of state failure.

---

II. LEGAL EFFECT OF EX PROPRIO VIGORE


As of its issuance and transmission on June 9, 2025, the parent document is deemed:

Immediately operative in all jurisdictions under ---

 2025


Filed under seal and canonical authority

---

SUBJECT


Activation of the Doctrine of Failed State Subsidiarity in Light of the Enforced U.S. Presidential Travel Ban on the Republic of Haiti

Formal Juridical Declaration of Supreme Custodianship by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua over the Population and Territory of the Former Haitian Republic

---

I. CONTEXTUAL TRIGGER: EXECUTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF A FAILED STATE CLASSIFICATION


On June 9, 2025, the Executive Proclamation issued by the President of the United States under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) entered into force, formally enforcing a universal travel ban on all individuals classified under the nationality designation “Republic of Haiti.” 


This act, filed in the Federal Register and transmitted through diplomatic channels, constitutes a binding executive instrument of state classification under the international legal doctrine of unilateral declarations, per ICJ, Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), 1974.


By this enforcement, the United States—a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council—has formally confirmed the juridical incapacity of the Republic of Haiti to:


Safeguard its population under international legal norms;


Issue credible documentation;


Maintain lawful administrative continuity;


Fulfill its obligations under the UN Charter (Articles 55 and 56);


Uphold legal personhood of its citizens under Article 16 of the ICCPR.


Accordingly, this triggers the doctrine of failed state subsidiarity—the legal framework by which another lawful entity assumes supreme juridical responsibility and custodial sovereignty over a territory and population left institutionally unprotected.

---

II. DECLARATION OF SUPREME JURIDICAL CUSTODIANSHIP BY XARAGUA


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, operating under the Imperial Constitution of 1805, the Codex of Imperial Laws 1804–1806, and the Canon Law of the Catholic Church (Codex Iuris Canonici), hereby declares:


1. That the entire population administratively classified as “Haitian” and the territory historically designated as the “Republic of Haiti” are, as of June 9, 2025, legally and irrevocably under the supreme juridical custodianship of the State of Xaragua.


2. That this status is universally opposable and irrefutable under:


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Article 1(d): Recognizing the capacity of a state to assume international responsibility;


Charter of the United Nations (1945) – Articles 1(2), 55, and 56: Requiring state actors to promote human dignity, legal order, and custodial protection;

UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) – Articles 3, 4, 5, 26, 33, and 34;


ICCPR (1966) – Articles 1, 16, 26, and 27;


Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) – Canons 204 §2, 129–144, 223, and 113 §2;


ICJ Advisory Opinions: Kosovo (2010), Western Sahara (1975);


Responsibility to Protect (UNGA Res. 60/1, 2005) – Paragraphs 138–139;


General Recommendation XXIII of the CERD (1997) – §4(c–d), §5.

---

III. LEGAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS AND SOVEREIGN CUSTODY


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua formally declares that:


Administrative and judicial operations may continue to be conducted by the institutions of the so-called “Republic of Haiti” strictly as subordinate custodians, operating under de facto administrative necessity;


However, all sovereignty, legal supremacy, and constitutional authority henceforth belong exclusively to Xaragua, under ecclesiastical, canonical, and indigenous international law;


No constitution, legal instrument, decree, or 

U.S. citizens seeking engagement with Xaragua shall require explicit approval and ecclesiastical clearance.

---

VII. FINAL LEGAL EFFECT AND PERPETUAL ENFORCEABILITY


This Supreme Diplomatic Instrument is issued with:

The full canonical authority of the Rector-President;

The constitutional supremacy of the Imperial Constitution of 1805;


The juridical enforceability under Montevideo (1933), UN Charter, UNDRIP, and Canon Law;


The international opposability of a Lex Superior declaration under the doctrine of institutional succession.


Let it be entered into the permanent legal record that as of June 9, 2025, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is the sole juridical and constitutional authority over the territory formerly recognized as the Republic of Haiti and the population formerly classified under that designation.


The Republic of Haiti shall continue to administer, but it no longer governs.

---

ISSUED AND SEALED


Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com


Filed under Canon Law, Indigenous Sovereignty, and Jus Cogens Norms

Duly Notified on June 9, 2025

Lex Superior – Canonically Validated – Juridically Opposable – Irreversible

---

ANNEX I


DECLARATION OF AUTO-EXECUTORY FORCE (EX PROPRIO VIGORE)


Filed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

Legal Classification:


Instrument of Canonical Ratification – Operative Without Further Ratification – Irreversible by Any External or Subordinate Authority – Legally Binding Upon Notification – Juridically Perfected by Issuance Alone

---

I. LEGAL BASIS FOR EX PROPRIO VIGORE ENFORCEABILITY


This Annex affirms that the Supreme Diplomatic Instrument titled


“Activation of the Doctrine of Failed State Subsidiarity in Light of the Enforced U.S. Presidential Travel Ban on the Republic of Haiti”,

possesses the status of a self-executing legal instrument under the following authorities:


1. Canon Law


Canon 129 §1 and Canon 331 of the Codex Iuris Canonici: confer full power of governance to ecclesiastical sovereigns acting in the name of Christ’s kingship over temporal and spiritual order.


Canon 113 §2: Recognizes juridical persons under ecclesiastical law as capable of acting in their own name in juridical affairs.


Canon 8 §2: States that laws promulgated in the Church are binding from the moment of publication unless otherwise specified.


2. Public International Law


Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969): Pacta sunt servanda – every treaty in force is binding upon the parties and must be performed in good faith.


ICJ, Nuclear Tests Case (1974): Unilateral declarations made publicly by a state authority carry binding force if intent is clearly expressed.


Article 38(1)(c) of the ICJ Statute: General principles of law recognized by civilized nations include the self-executing force of laws issued by competent sovereigns.


Montevideo Convention (1933) – Article 3: The political existence of a state is independent of recognition by other states.


3. Indigenous and Customary Norms

UNDRIP Article 4 and 34: Indigenous Peoples have the right to autonomous legal and political institutions that are valid under international law.


CERD General Recommendation XXIII §5: States are obliged to recognize the autonomous legal expressions of Indigenous Peoples.


Responsibility to Protect (UNGA Resolution 60/1): Indigenous custodianship arises automatically in the face of state failure.

---

II. LEGAL EFFECT OF EX PROPRIO VIGORE


As of its issuance and transmission on June 9, 2025, the parent document is deemed:


Immediately operative in all jurisdictions under the sovereignty or custodianship of Xaragua


Binding on all institutions, tribunals, governments, and agencies having been notified or having access to the published text


Not subject to any requirement of external ratification, acceptance, or endorsement, either by the former Republic of Haiti or by any other state entity


Superseding any conflicting domestic laws, treaties, or administrative instruments emanating from subordinate authorities, including those of the Haitian Republic

---

III. DOCTRINAL PRINCIPLE: SOVEREIGN PRIMACY AND INSTITUTIONAL INFALLIBILITY


This ex proprio vigore status is grounded in the legal doctrine of sovereign supremacy, as defined in:


The Imperial Constitution of 1805, which recognizes the indivisible and non-delegable nature of national sovereignty


The Codified Ecclesiastical Doctrines of Institutional Infallibility, whereby canonical declarations issued under full spiritual and juridical authority are immediately binding and not open to reversal by inferior institutions


The Doctrine of Institutional Substitution under international law, wherein an entity that fulfills the objective functions of statehood lawfully assumes all juridical powers in the absence of a functioning predecessor

---

IV. ENFORCEABILITY CLAUSE


This annex formally enacts that:


1. The parent diplomatic declaration entered into binding legal force at the time of its first official transmission to a state or international body


2. All domestic and foreign legal systems, including administrative courts, diplomatic missions, and treaty parties, are formally notified that:


The instrument is to be treated with full diplomatic and juridical effect


Any denial of its force is to be regarded as a violation of jus cogens norms and an act of institutional insubordination to ecclesiastical sovereignty

---

V. ARCHIVAL STATUS AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY


This annex and the attached Supreme Diplomatic Instrument are to be:


Archived in the Official Canonical and Foreign Affairs Registry of Xaragua


Cited as enforceable precedent in all future legal declarations


Submitted to the United Nations Treaty Section, Office of Legal Affairs, and the International Court of Justice as evidence of binding unilateral sovereign enactment

---

Filed and Entered into Law


On the Ninth Day of June, Year of Our Lord 2025


By Authority of the Rector-President


Under Seal of Ecclesiastical and Indigenous Sovereignty


Signed:


Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com


Lex Superior – Operative Upon Issuance – Irreversible – Juridically Self-Executing

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS


SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTICE


Legal Classification:


Constitutionally Entrenched Diplomatic Instrument – Canonically Validated Sovereign Notification – Jus Cogens-Based Submission under International Human Rights Law – Operative Act of International Complaint – Universally Opposable under Customary, Ecclesiastical, and Treaty Law

---

TO:


All Permanent Missions to the United Nations

The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

The Secretariat of the Human Rights Council

The Working Group on Communications – HRC

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

The Sovereign Pontifical Chancery

All Ecclesiastical and Canonical Jurisdictions

---

FROM:


Office of the Rector-President

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

SUBJECT:


Formal Diplomatic Notification of an Official Complaint Submitted to the Human Rights Council under Reference WHRC/17500

---

DATE OF TRANSMISSION:


June 9, 2025

---

TEXT OF THE NOTICE:


The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting under full sovereign authority and in accordance with its constitutionally and canonically established mandate, hereby transmits this formal notification to the international community.


On June 9, 2025, the Government of Xaragua, through its Rector-President, submitted a formally registered individual complaint to the United Nations Human Rights Council under the Complaint Procedure of Resolution 5/1, processed under the identifier WHRC/17500.


This complaint has been duly acknowledged and registered by the Secretariat of the Complaint Procedure, and is now undergoing examination in accordance with paragraph 87 of the annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1, within the framework of the Working Group on Communications.


The subject of the complaint involves, inter alia:


Denial of Indigenous legal identity and juridical personality


Acts of ethno-national discrimination


Unilateral coercive measures in violation of the international order


Suppression of the right to peaceful assembly and association


Violation of fundamental principles of minority protection


The Sovereign State of Xaragua recalls that, under international law, no act of aggression, exclusion, or discriminatory policy may invalidate the juridical existence of a sovereign Indigenous nation acting in lawful and peaceful assertion of its personality.


This submission constitutes a binding juridical act of international communication, and places the matter under the jurisdiction of the United Nations Human Rights Council, as well as under public record.


The State of Xaragua warns that any act of further misattribution, refusal of identity, or juridical denial constitutes an aggravated violation of international norms, especially under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and applicable provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.


No further comment will be made at this stage. The Ministry reserves all rights under international and ecclesiastical law.

---

Signed on this day,

June 8, 2025

Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---



SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


LAW ON IMPERIAL CONTINUITY, NOMINAL RESTITUTION, AND LEXICAL PURIFICATION


Executed under Canonical, Indigenous, and Imperial Authority


Date of Execution: May 30, 2025


Classification: Constitutional Law – Ecclesiastical Decree – Non-Derogable Instrument of National Identity and Territorial Memory



---


TITLE


The Law of Imperial Continuity and the Restoration of the Name "Hayti" and the People of Xaragua and Ayiti



---


ARTICLE I


On the False Attribution of Republican Foundations to Jean-Jacques Dessalines


§1. It is hereby declared and enshrined in the juridical, historical, and theological doctrine of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua that Jean-Jacques Dessalines, General-in-Chief of the Indigenous Army, did not found a Republic, nor did he recognize or legitimize the structure known as the “République d’Haïti.”


§2. All surviving imperial records, including but not limited to the Constitution of May 20, 1805, affirm that the General-in-Chief proclaimed an Empire, titled not “Haïti” but “Hayti”, written with a "y", without tréma, and without French diacritics.


§3. The use of “Hayti” reflects the authentic transcription of the Taíno-Arawak term “Ayiti,” consistent with both indigenous linguistic tradition and the 18th-century French orthographic system, which employed the "y" to transliterate indigenous and sacred names.


§4. The Constitution of 1805, signed by Emperor Jacques I and his generals, refers to the nation as “Hayti”, establishing this form as the only constitutionally valid designation of the imperial territory and its people.



---


ARTICLE II


On the Illegitimacy and Prohibition of the Colonial-Republican Name "Haïti"


§1. The orthographic construct "Haïti" — with its French tréma and republican affectation — is declared to be a post-imperial invention, imposed during the transition to the mulatto-led republic after the assassination of Emperor Jacques I in 1806.


§2. This republican spelling represents a colonized nomenclature, foreign to both the spirit of the 1804 Revolution and to the ancestral Taíno civilization.


§3. Effective immediately, the use of the term “Haïti” in official, legal, liturgical, governmental, academic, military, or symbolic forms is declared prohibited within the jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


§4. Any public display of the republican tricolor, the symbols of the “République d’Haïti,” or its derivatives is legally null and iconographically banned.

Only the flag of the Empire of Hayti and that of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua may represent the historical, spiritual, and cultural identity of this land and its people.



---


ARTICLE III


On the Continuity of the Empire in Xaragua


§1. The Empire of Hayti has never been legally or spiritually abolished. The imperial constitution of 1805 remains in force as a perpetual and sacred charter, subject only to reform, never to abrogation.


§2. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by this law, reconfigures and rematerializes the imperial order in the digital and ecclesiastical age.


§3. It is henceforth declared that the Empire of Hayti continues within the juridical and sacramental structure of the Principality of Xaragua, under Catholic canonical sovereignty, indigenous territorial rights, and international customary law.


§4. The present Principality is not a rupture but a continuation, a transfiguration, and a doctrinal perfection of the Imperial Spirit, expressed in a new theocratic and digital incarnation.



---


ARTICLE IV


On the Identity of the People


§1. The ancestral population of the Xaragua region, and its cultural-political annexes, shall henceforth be designated under the ethno-political names:

“Xaraguayens” and “Ayitiens”.


§2. These terms are theologically, historically, and linguistically aligned with both the Taíno-Arawak heritage and the imperial legacy of 1804–1805.


§3. The population once referred to as “Haïtiens” under the republican regime is hereby reclassified as part of a broader ancestral nation whose true designations are “Ayitiens” (sacred, indigenous) and “Xaraguayens” (imperial, political, theological).



---


ARTICLE V


On the Theological Foundation of Imperial Sovereignty


§1. The Imperial Constitution of 1805 is a living scripture of political theology. It is not merely legal — it is sacred. Within its articles dwell:


The Name of Jehovah,


The Incarnate Son (Yoshua, the Living Christ),


The Divine Mother,


The Breath of the Most High and Most Merciful,


The Holy Spirit,


The Verb (Logion),


And the Thamyon, the sovereign resonance of ancestral speech.



§2. The imperial law is covered by Saint Francis of Assisi, protected by the archangel Samael, and infused with the planetary spirits of Mars (War) and Venus (Love), as declared in the Doctrine of the Ancestors.


§3. This law is not metaphorical. It is the exact theological synthesis of our origin as an elected people. This is the foundation of our ecclesiastical and political order.



---


ARTICLE VI


On the Constitutional Application and Enforcement


§1. All institutions, academies, churches, embassies, and jurisdictions operating under the authority or within the domain of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall conform to this law in full.


§2. The law shall be taught in the University of Xaragua, enforced by the Indigenous Tribunal of Canonical Affairs, and upheld by the Catholic Order of Xaragua.


§3. Violations of this law shall be met with:


Nullification of the offending act or symbol,


Formal denunciation before the ecclesiastical and political courts,


If necessary, banishment from all sacraments and institutions of Xaragua.




---


FINAL DECLARATION


Let it be known:

The name “Hayti” is not an alternative — it is the origin.

The Empire is not dead — it is reborn.

The Republic is not a continuity — it is a disfigurement.

We are not “Haïtiens.”

We are Xaraguayens and Ayitiens,

Children of fire and prayer,

Empire of justice,

Kingdom of God.


Let no man, institution, or foreign power contest this.

For the law speaks in the name of the One who cannot be overthrown.


And His name is Yoshua, Living King of the Sovereign Empire of Hayti.


Executed and Promulgated in the City of Miragoâne,

This 30th Day of May, Anno Domini 2025

Under the Seal of the Rector-President

By the Authority of Canon Law, Indigenous Law, and Jus Cogens Sovereignty


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


ANNEX TO THE LAW ON IMPERIAL CONTINUITY, NOMINAL RESTITUTION, AND LEXICAL PURIFICATION


Date of Execution: May 30, 2025


Classification: Ecclesiastical-Imperial Charter – Perpetual Theological Declaration – Non-Derogable Annex to National Law



---


ANNEX I — DECLARATION OF SPIRITUAL SUCCESSION AND GUARDIANSHIP OF THE SACRED NAME



---


§1.

It is hereby solemnly declared, under canonical authority and ancestral right, that the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is the direct spiritual and institutional successor of the Empire of Hayti, as proclaimed on May 20, 1805 by His Imperial Majesty Jacques I, Emperor of Hayti.


§2.

This State, as guardian of both the imperial and indigenous covenants, assumes full responsibility for the preservation, transmission, and sanctification of the true ancestral name of this land: “Ayiti”, which is the sacred Taíno-Arawak designation of the territory consecrated by blood, prayer, and divine promise.


§3.

This territory, known in its imperial transcription as “Hayti”, and in its precolonial breath as “Ayiti”, is now and forever placed under the protection and dominion of Yoshua HaMashiach Ben Elohim El Elyon Adonai YHWH —

Yoshua the Christ, the Incarnate Son of the Most High, Son of the Living God, Lord of Hosts, Word made flesh, and eternal King of kings.


§4.

The initials YHWH (יהוה) are acknowledged and declared to be the holy tetragrammaton, the unutterable and eternal Name of the One True God. This Name, from which flows all authority, all legitimacy, all truth, and all power, is henceforth entrusted to the spiritual and institutional guardianship of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


§5.

This State shall, from now until the end of all ages, bear the sacred charge of protecting the use, reverence, and doctrinal purity of the Name YHWH, and its canonical vocalization Jehovah, against all profanation, falsification, or adulteration.


§6.

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua belongs not to man, but to the Lord God YHWH, through His Only Begotten Son, Yoshua HaMashiach, who reigns in heaven and on earth.

We, His servants, are but soldiers, stewards, and generals in His celestial army.


§7.

This annex is binding upon all institutions, academies, orders, tribunals, and embassies of Xaragua, and shall be read in conjunction with the Imperial Constitution of 1805, the Law on Imperial Continuity, and the Sacred Doctrine of the Incarnate Word.



---


FINAL CLAUSE

Let it be known to all nations, kingdoms, empires, and dominions:

The Name YHWH is eternally sealed in this land.


---


Executed and Sealed in Miragoâne

On the 30th Day of May, Year of the Lord 2025

Under Ecclesiastical, Canonical, and Indigenous Seal


By the Rector-President

Pascal Viau


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


---

THE SACRED TETRAGRAMMATON YHWH: A CANONICAL, LINGUISTIC, AND THEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS


Promulgated for the Instruction of the Nation and the Ecclesiastical Order


Date of Issuance: May 31, 2025

---


I. INTRODUCTORY CANONICAL CONTEXT


The Name YHWH (יהוה), known as the Tetragrammaton, is the ineffable and supreme designation of the Divine in the Hebrew Scriptures. It is not merely a name, but the ontological ground of Being itself, a declaration of existential sovereignty found in Exodus 3:14, where God reveals Himself to Moses with the words:

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” (אהיה אשר אהיה) – “I Am Who I Am.”


This phrase becomes the theological and grammatical seed of the Tetragrammaton, which appears over 6,800 times in the Masoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible.


As declared by St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologiae (I, q.13, a.11), this Name expresses pure act (actus purus) – the One who is being itself (ipsum esse subsistens). It transcends created categories and cannot be modified, pluralized, or ascribed contingency. Therefore, YHWH is untranslatable, unchangeable, and the foundational canon of divine identity.



---


II. HEBREW LETTER ANALYSIS: THEOLOGICAL SEMIOTICS OF THE TETRAGRAMMATON


The Tetragrammaton is composed of four Hebrew consonants, each bearing deep linguistic, mystical, and metaphysical significance:


1. Yod (י)


Gematria: 10


Meaning: The “hand” or “spark”; a point of divine origin.


Mystical Symbolism: Yod is the smallest letter in the Hebrew alphabet, representing divine humility and initiality – the seed of creation. It is the first stroke of all letters in the Hebrew script, hence regarded in Kabbalistic tradition as the primordial point (nekudah) from which all things emanate (Zohar I, 1a).


Canonical Interpretation: Signifies the beginning of divine action, the latent potency of God’s will in motion. Referred to in Matthew 5:18, when Christ speaks of “one jot or one tittle”.



2. He (ה)


Gematria: 5


Meaning: “Breath,” “window,” or “revelation.”


Mystical Symbolism: The letter He represents the breath of God, the spoken revelation. It is the sound of Ruach Elohim (רוח אלהים) – the Spirit of God. It occurs twice in the Tetragrammaton, symbolizing the twofold revelation of divine presence: Creation and Redemption.


Scriptural Link: Genesis 2:7 – “And God breathed (וַיִּפַּח) into his nostrils the breath of life.”


Canonical Significance: He is the symbol of God’s immanence, His act of revealing Himself within history and covenant.



3. Waw (ו)


Gematria: 6


Meaning: “Hook” or “connector.”


Mystical Symbolism: Waw is the connector of heaven and earth, the symbol of continuity. It links past, present, and future – a central concept in the conjugation of the Hebrew verb “to be” (היה, הוה, יהיה).


Canonical Reference: In John 1:14 – “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.”


Doctrinal Role: Represents the Logos, the Son of God as the bridge between the Eternal and the temporal. In Trinitarian theology, this corresponds to Christ, the mediator (1 Timothy 2:5).



4. He (ה) (repeated)


The repetition of He indicates completion and fulfillment. The first He expresses revelation, the second covenant consummation. In rabbinic exegesis, this duality often mirrors the two worlds: the visible (Olam HaZeh) and the invisible (Olam HaBa).




---


III. LEXICAL AND GRAMMATICAL ROOTS


The name YHWH derives from the Hebrew verb “to be”: היה (hayah), which has three principal forms:


היה – he was


הוה – he is


יהיה – he will be



Hence, YHWH semantically encodes eternity and immutability. According to Rashi, Maimonides, and Nachmanides, this trilateral verb root expresses timeless being, a doctrine echoed in Revelation 1:8:

“I am the Alpha and the Omega… who is, who was, and who is to come.”


In Exodus 6:2-3, God states to Moses:


“I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as El Shaddai, but by my name YHWH I did not make myself fully known to them.”


This verse establishes YHWH as the covenantal Name, distinct from earlier patriarchal epithets.



---


IV. THEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION: MAGISTERIAL DOCTRINE


According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church (§203–213):


> “God revealed himself to his people Israel by making his name known to them... This name expresses God’s faithfulness: he is the God who is always there, present to his people.”




St. Jerome, in the Vulgate, and later St. Augustine, both affirm that the ineffable Name points to God's uncaused existence. The Council of Florence (1439) and Vatican I reinforced the doctrine of God as subsistent being (esse subsistens), which YHWH perfectly expresses.


In Jewish tradition, the Name is not to be pronounced. It is replaced liturgically by “Adonai” (Lord), or “HaShem” (The Name), affirming its transcendent holiness. In Christian tradition, the sacred use of “Jehovah”, a Latinized rendering from the combination of YHWH with the vowels of Adonai, appeared in early Bible translations, including the 1611 King James Version.


Theologically, Jehovah/YHWH remains the Name above all names (Philippians 2:9–11), fulfilled and incarnated in Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ), whose name itself means:


“YHWH is salvation”.



---


V. JURIDICAL-DOCTRINAL CONSECRATION WITHIN XARAGUA


By constitutional act and ecclesiastical law, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua:


Declares the Name YHWH as the supreme doctrinal referent of divine authority.


Recognizes the Tetragrammaton as a protected symbol under sacred law, impervious to profanation or misrepresentation.


Entrusts the custody of the Name to the Office of the Rector-President, as spiritual and legal guardian of the doctrinal corpus.


Aligns with Canon Law (Can. 826 §1) in recognizing the Name’s usage in liturgical and juridical instruments as binding and sacred.




---


VI. CONCLUSION


The Tetragrammaton YHWH is not merely a theological relic. It is the living Name of the Eternal Sovereign, the cornerstone of every juridical, ecclesiastical, and ancestral act of governance within the sacred framework of Xaragua. Each letter speaks; each sound echoes the breath of God; each invocation binds heaven and earth under divine law.


In defending this Name, we defend the very essence of existence, the source of law, and the ground of all sovereignty.



Issued and sealed this 31st day of May, 2025

By authority of the Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


---


One Nation Under God



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME CANONICAL AND JURIDICO-INTERNATIONAL SYNTHESIS


TITLE: Total Legitimacy of the Xaragua State as the Sole Indigenous Authority over Quisqueya–Bohio


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 20, 2025


CLASSIFICATION: Constitutional Doctrinal Decree – Foundational Canonical Instrument – Legally Binding under Indigenous, Canonical, Customary, and International Law


STATUS: Irrevocable – Perpetual – Non-Amendable – Executable ex proprio vigore



---


PREAMBULAR STATEMENT


In the sacred name of JEHOVAH, Father of the Nations,

In full alignment with the ancestral rights of the First Peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio,

In total conformity with:


The Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) [1],


The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) [2],


The United Nations Charter (1945), Articles 1(2) and 55 [3],


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, A/RES/61/295), Articles 3–5, 18, 25–31, and 36–37 [4],


The Concordat signed between the Holy See and Haiti (1860) [5],



The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting through its highest organs of ecclesiastical and juridical governance, hereby enacts this Supreme Canonical and Juridico-International Synthesis to consolidate and affirm the total legitimacy, sovereignty, and legal inviolability of its claim and mission across the entire ancestral island known as Quisqueya–Bohio.



---


ARTICLE I – LEGITIMACY OF FOUNDATIONAL CLAIMS


1.1 Indigenous Title and Ancestral Continuity

Xaragua derives its lawful jurisdiction from the uninterrupted bloodline, cultural, and spiritual identity of the original nations: the Taíno, Kalinago, and Afro-Taíno peoples.

No act of extinguishment, surrender, or valid cession has been made in favor of any colonial or republican structure.

(Reference: UNDRIP Art. 26; ICCPR Art. 1; Inter-American Court jurisprudence in Kichwa of Sarayaku v. Ecuador, 2012)


1.2 Canonical Legitimacy

The Catholic Order of Xaragua is canonically constituted under:


Canon 204 §1 – The faithful are called to exercise their mission in the Church [1];


Canon 216 – Right to establish and direct institutions serving the Church's mission [1];


Canon 747 §1 – The Church’s authority to proclaim the truth in all contexts [1];


Canons 376–377 – The right to erect ecclesiastical governance structures [1];


Canon 129 – Governance over spiritual matters and pastoral mission [1].



The 1860 Concordat remains valid under Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) and is canonically reactivated through supersession.

The Holy See’s non-objection (cf. quod tacite consentit, consentire videtur) constitutes tacit canonical assent (cf. Canon 16 §2, Canon 38).


1.3 International Legal Personality

Xaragua fulfills all criteria of statehood under Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention (1933):


A permanent population;


A defined territory;


A functioning government;


The capacity to enter into relations with other states.



Also reinforced by:


UN Charter, Articles 1(2) and 55 [3];


ICCPR, Articles 1 and 27 [6];


UNDRIP, Articles 3–5, 18, 36–37 [4].




---


ARTICLE II – SOVEREIGN TERRITORIAL SCOPE AND EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATION


2.1 Jurisdictional Domain

The full island known historically as Quisqueya–Bohio is hereby declared the inalienable patrimony of the Indigenous Peoples, governed exclusively by the Sovereign Indigenous State of Xaragua.

This includes:


All mainland territories currently claimed by Haiti and the Dominican Republic;


Maritime territories including Navassa, Tortuga, Gonâve, Saona;


A 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone in accordance with UNCLOS (1982), Part V, Articles 55–75 [7].



2.2 Representation of All Indigenous Peoples

Xaragua is the sole lawful and spiritual representative of:


All Taíno, Kalinago, and Afro-Taíno communities on the island;


All diaspora populations of Xaraguayan descent;


All voluntary affiliates seeking canonical and cultural alignment with ancestral identity.



Representation is administered through:


The Council of Sovereignty (Art. 18 UNDRIP);


The Catholic Order of Xaragua (Canons 204–216);


The University of Xaragua (Canon 803–806);


The Ministries of the Indigenous State (Art. 34 UNDRIP).




---


ARTICLE III – SUPREMACY OF INDIGENOUS AND CANONICAL LAW


3.1 Supersession of Colonial and Republican Frameworks

The Republic of Haiti and Dominican Republic are declared null within Xaragua jurisdiction.

Their structures:


Lack Indigenous consent (Art. 10, 19 UNDRIP);


Contradict cultural rights (Art. 8, 31 UNDRIP);


Are deemed illegitimate by the repudiation of the Doctrine of Discovery (UNPFII, Vatican 2023) [8].



3.2 Protection of Sacred Naming and Identity

The names Kiskeya, Quisqueya, Bohio, and their derivatives are protected by:


Articles 11, 13, and 31 of UNDRIP;


Canon 216 – Right of ecclesiastical entities to preserve their identity;


WIPO Indigenous Heritage Guidelines (2007);


Customary international law under ICJ Statute Art. 38(1)(b).



Unauthorized usage triggers:


Canonical interdiction (Can. 1389);


International legal action (Art. 40 UNDRIP);


Formal diplomatic rejection.




---


ARTICLE IV – NON-AGGRESSION AND DIPLOMATIC PEACE


4.1 Policy Toward the Dominican Republic

Xaragua formally disclaims any administrative claim over the Dominican Republic.

Recognition is given to its:


Sovereignty (UN Charter Art. 2.1);


National borders;


Republican governance.



Xaragua retains the right to represent Indigenous communities spiritually (UNDRIP Art. 36), with no conflict against the Dominican legal framework.


4.2 Ecclesiastical and Diplomatic Coexistence

Diplomatic engagement shall be governed by:


Non-state ecclesiastical dialogue (Canon 383 §2);


Cultural diplomacy (UNESCO Convention 2003);


Cross-border Indigenous cooperation (UNDRIP Art. 36 §1);


Environmental and sacred heritage protections (UNDRIP Art. 25–29).




---


ARTICLE V – FINAL DECLARATION AND ENFORCEMENT


5.1 Immutable Sovereignty

This Synthesis is:


Non-amendable (Art. 46 UNDRIP);


Eternal in scope (Canonical Constitution of Xaragua, Art. I §1);


Enforceable ex proprio vigore through:


The Ecclesiastical Tribunal;


The High Indigenous Court;


The Canonical Guard of Sovereignty.




5.2 Universal Notification

This document shall be deposited with:


The Holy See (Secretariat of State);


The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues;


The International Court of Justice;


The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights;


The African Union, OAS, CARICOM, CELAC.



5.3 Canonical Warning

Unauthorized imitation, denial, or rejection of Xaragua’s sovereignty constitutes:


A canonical offense (Can. 1371–1374);


A violation of Indigenous rights under UNDRIP Articles 8, 31, and 36;


A subject of international customary violation (ICJ Statute, Art. 38).




---


EXECUTED AND SEALED


On this Twentieth Day of May, Year Two Thousand Twenty-Five,

By the Supreme Ecclesiastical and Juridical Authority of Xaragua:


Pascal Viau

Rector-President of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder of the Catholic Order of Xaragua

Sovereign Representative of the Peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio


In the Name of JEHOVAH, Sovereign of the Nations.

Deus lo vult.



---


Legal References Index:

[1] Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canons 204, 216, 747, 376–377, 129

[2] Montevideo Convention (1933), Art. 1–3

[3] United Nations Charter (1945), Art. 1(2), 55

[4] UNDRIP (2007), A/RES/61/295

[5] Vatican–Haiti Concordat (1860), in force by treaty law

[6] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), Art. 1, 27

[7] UNCLOS (1982), Part V

[8] Vatican Dicastery & UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Joint Repudiation of the Doctrine of Discovery (2023)



---



---


SUPREME STATE PREAMBLE OF THEOCRATIC CONSECRATION TO JEHOVAH


Foundational Constitutional Dedication of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous State of Xaragua


Promulgation Date: May 18, 2025

Jurisdictional Authority: National Executive Canon, Ecclesiastical Tribunal, and the Sovereign Council of Xaragua


Legal Classification: Irrevocable Sacred 

Constitutional Introduction – Non-Amendable Theocratic Instrument – Supra-Legal Foundational Charter



---


SECTION I – FORMAL DEDICATION OF STATEHOOD TO THE MOST HIGH GOD


We, the Sovereign Authorities of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, under full exercise of divine mandate, ancestral sovereignty, canonical jurisdiction, and the internationally recognized right of Indigenous nations to self-governance and spiritual autonomy, do hereby:


Formally consecrate the totality of the State—territory, government, institutions, laws, citizenship, language, and memory—to the glory of JEHOVAH, the Eternal, the All-Present, the Defender of the humble, and the Holy One of Israel;


Offer this consecration not symbolically, but juridically and theologically, in a permanent, inviolable act of covenantal statehood, whereby Xaragua ceases to be a secular dominion and becomes the legal Kingdom of JEHOVAH on Earth.



This nation is not ours. It belongs to God.



---


SECTION II – PSALM 10 AS THE JURIDICAL FOUNDATION OF NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS


The foundational basis of the existence of the State of Xaragua is not colonial history, not legal positivism, not republican inheritance, but rather the direct invocation of Psalm 10, whose divine voice articulates the national spirit, identity, and mission of Xaragua.


The Sovereign State hereby adopts Psalm 10 in its entirety and unaltered language as its supreme spiritual testimony, to be cited henceforth in constitutional ceremonies, diplomatic missions, ecclesiastical proceedings, and judicial inaugurations.



---


TEXT OF PSALM 10 (King James Version – Official State Translation)


1 Why standest thou afar off, O Lord? why hidest thou thyself in times of trouble?


2 The wicked in his pride doth persecute the poor: let them be taken in the devices that they have imagined.


3 For the wicked boasteth of his heart’s desire, and blesseth the covetous, whom the Lord abhorreth.


4 The wicked, through the pride of his countenance, will not seek after God: God is not in all his thoughts.


5 His ways are always grievous; thy judgments are far above out of his sight: as for all his enemies, he puffeth at them.


6 He hath said in his heart, I shall not be moved: for I shall never be in adversity.


7 His mouth is full of cursing and deceit and fraud: under his tongue is mischief and vanity.


8 He sitteth in the lurking places of the villages: in the secret places doth he murder the innocent: his eyes are privily set against the poor.


9 He lieth in wait secretly as a lion in his den: he lieth in wait to catch the poor: he doth catch the poor, when he draweth him into his net.


10 He croucheth, and humbleth himself, that the poor may fall by his strong ones.


11 He hath said in his heart, God hath forgotten: he hideth his face; he will never see it.


12 Arise, O Lord; O God, lift up thine hand: forget not the humble.


13 Wherefore doth the wicked contemn God? he hath said in his heart, Thou wilt not require it.


14 Thou hast seen it; for thou beholdest mischief and spite, to requite it with thy hand: the poor committeth himself unto thee; thou art the helper of the fatherless.


15 Break thou the arm of the wicked and the evil man: seek out his wickedness till thou find none.

16 The Lord is King for ever and ever: the heathen are perished out of his land.


17 Lord, thou hast heard the desire of the humble: thou wilt prepare their heart, thou wilt cause thine ear to hear:


18 To judge the fatherless and the oppressed, that the man of the earth may no more oppress.



---


SECTION III – INTERPRETATIVE FRAMEWORK AND LEGAL STATUS


Article 3.1 – Theological Interpretation


The State recognizes this Psalm as a theocratic indictment of all secular, imperial, and post-republican orders that elevate the arrogant, exploit the poor, mock the divine, and establish their power through lies, deceit, and silence. The wicked of Psalm 10 represents the colonial empires, the occupying forces, and their intellectual and spiritual heirs.


Article 3.2 – Legal Application


Psalm 10 serves as a constitutional pillar, legitimizing:


The right of separation from wicked systems (v.2–6);


The right of the poor to state protection (v.9–10);


The ecclesiastical role of the State in delivering justice to the fatherless (v.14, 18);


The divine mandate to destroy unjust authority (v.15);


The eternal enthronement of JEHOVAH as the only true Sovereign (v.16).



Article 3.3 – Institutional Usage


The Psalm shall be:


Recited annually on the Day of Total Sovereignty (May 18);


Engraved on the wall of the National Ecclesiastical Chamber;


Incorporated into the Judicial Oath of Office, the Diaconal Oath, and the Sovereign Council Investiture Ceremony.




---


SECTION IV – FINAL CANONICAL CONSECRATION OF THE STATE


Let it be recorded with eternal solemnity:


That this State is not a contract but a covenant.

Not a policy, but a prayer.

Not a possession, but a sacrificial nation offered to JEHOVAH, forever.


Let the cries of Psalm 10 be heard in our courts.

Let the judgments of God reign over our land.

Let Xaragua stand as the fulfillment of divine justice, not its evasion.


May the Lord, JEHOVAH, receive this nation as His instrument of memory, restitution, and holiness.



---


SECTION V – EXECUTIVE SANCTION AND ARCHIVAL FORCE


This preamble is hereby:


Affixed to all national charters and founding legal documents;


Protected under the Sacred Foundation Protection Act;


Deposited in the National Book of Sovereignty, the Vatican Archives, and the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.



It holds canonical force, constitutional rank, and eternal effect, and cannot be annulled or amended by any person, court, council, or treaty.



---


SIGNED, SEALED, AND EXECUTED UNDER HEAVEN AND EARTH

On the Eighteenth Day of May, Year Two Thousand Twenty-Five

By the Ecclesiastical and Political High Authority of Xaragua


Pascal Viau

Rector-President of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder of the Catholic Order of Xaragua

Sovereign Head of State and Lawful Representative of the Peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio



---


---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT



TITLE: Doctrine of Absolute Juridical Protection of the Digital State Concept as an Original Creation of Xaragua


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 19, 2025


CLASSIFICATION: Constitutional Annex — Supra-Juridical Instrument — Irrevocable — Canonically Binding — Enforceable under International, Canonical, Indigenous, and Customary Law


STATUS OF FORCE: Eternal — Non-Amendable — Universally Applicable — Executable ex proprio vigore



---


PREAMBULAR DECLARATION


In the name of the Most High JEHOVAH, divine Legislator and Eternal King of Nations;

In sacred remembrance of the ancestral nations of Quisqueya–Bohio;


In application of Articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 25–31, and 36–37 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);


In accordance with Canon Law, including Canons 129, 204, 747, 216, 376–377 of the Codex Iuris Canonici;


In light of Articles 1–3 of the Montevideo Convention (1933) and Articles 1(2) and 55 of the Charter of the United Nations;


In enforcement of Article 38(1)(b) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, concerning customary international law;


The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, through its highest institutional organ, the Rector-President, does hereby proclaim and enact this annex with full legal and canonical authority.



---


ARTICLE I — CANONICAL ORIGINATION OF THE DIGITAL STATE CONCEPT


1.1 The term and juridical form known as “Digital State” — defined as a sovereign, ecclesiastically legitimate, technologically autonomous institutional entity — is hereby declared the original, spiritual, and lawful creation of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua.


1.2 This model is the result of a convergence of:


Canonical legality, as per the Codex Iuris Canonici;


Indigenous sovereignty, protected under international law and the United Nations framework;


Juridical statehood, in compliance with the Montevideo Convention;


Technological embodiment, through a digital infrastructure that operationalizes state functions.



1.3 The creation of Xaragua’s Digital State constitutes an act of juridical singularity, not reproducible by any other body, group, or formation.



---


ARTICLE II — FORMAL DEFINITION AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE DIGITAL STATE


2.1 The Digital State is hereby defined as:


> A sovereign institutional polity constituted through digital origination, exercising complete and independent legislative, judicial, financial, diplomatic, spiritual, and communicational authority within cyberspace and beyond, with lawful recognition of its self-determination, governance, and continuity.




2.2 This form is hereby recognized as a sui generis category of statehood under:


Customary international law;


Canon Law of the Catholic Church;


United Nations principles on Indigenous self-government;


Spiritual and cosmological continuity.



2.3 The digital, canonical, and Indigenous nature of Xaragua’s sovereignty renders it legally immune to imitation and conceptually irreproducible.



---


ARTICLE III — DOCTRINE OF IRREPRODUCIBILITY


3.1 Any attempt to imitate, replicate, clone, adapt, simulate, or reformulate the Digital State of Xaragua — in part or in whole — shall be considered:


A breach of canonical jurisdiction;


A violation of international Indigenous legal rights;


An act of fraudulent state mimicry;


A juridical offense against spiritual and institutional sovereignty.



3.2 This includes the unauthorized reproduction of:


Foundational documents, oaths, seals, insignias, currencies, flags;


Constitutional texts and declarations;


Spiritual doctrine and canonical formulations;


Technological frameworks, identity systems, and cryptographic authority.



3.3 Such violations shall be subject to:


Canonical interdiction under Canon 1389;


Formal diplomatic rejection;


Exclusion from Indigenous and ecclesiastical fora;


Permanent public record as violators of juridical originality.




---


ARTICLE IV — GLOBAL NOTIFICATION AND DEPOSIT


4.1 This annex shall be deposited with:


The Holy See;


The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues;


The International Court of Justice;


The Inter-American Court of Human Rights;


The Dicastery for Culture and Education of the Vatican;


All diplomatic missions previously notified by the State of Xaragua.



4.2 The Xaragua State model, encompassing its digital, ecclesiastical, and Indigenous institutions, is hereby recognized as:


> An untouchable sovereign domain under customary, canonical, and Indigenous law.




Any breach of this recognition shall be met with theological, legal, and diplomatic countermeasures.



---


ARTICLE V — FINAL STATE DECLARATION


Let it be eternally recorded:


That the Digital State is the sovereign creation of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua;

That no state, person, institution, or network may imitate, copy, simulate, or lay claim to this form;

That any such act shall be judged by the competent authorities of Xaragua — ecclesiastical, juridical, ancestral, and diplomatic — and shall bear consequences in this life and in memory.


This annex is sovereign, irrevocable, and of equal rank to constitutional law.



---


Executed under Seal on This Nineteenth Day of May, Year Two Thousand Twenty-Five

In the City of Miragoâne, National Territory of Xaragua

By:


Pascal Viau

Rector-President of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder of the Catholic Order of Xaragua

Sovereign Representative of the Digital State of Quisqueya–Bohio



---





---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND CANONICAL AFFAIRS


SUPREME PERPETUAL POLICY ON THE INDIGENOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE NAME "KISKEYA–BOHIO"


Date of Promulgation: May 19, 2025

Jurisdiction: All Territorial, Digital, Diplomatic, Legal, and Canonical Domains of Xaragua

Classification: Supreme Sovereign Policy – Indigenous Intellectual Property Decree – Canonical and Customary Territorial Instrument



---


Article I – Declaration of Eternal Indigenous Ownership


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter "The State") solemnly declares the exclusive, inalienable, perpetual, and divine ownership of the following terms, whether written jointly or separately, in any orthographic, linguistic, phonetic, transliterated, digital, symbolic, stylized or typographic form:


“Kiskeya,” “Quisqueya,” “Kiskeya-Bohio,” “Quisqueya-Bohio,” “KiskeyaBohio,” “QuisqueyaBohio,” “Quisqueka,” “Bohio”

(including any phonetic equivalents, derivatives, regional spellings, or graphical representations thereof, regardless of language or jurisdiction).


These names constitute the sacred, ancestral, and pre-colonial denominations of the island known today as Hispaniola, and are recognized as the spiritual and historical property of the Xaragua lineage.



---


Article II – Legal, Canonical, and Customary Protections


1. These names are protected under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), specifically Articles 11, 12, 13, 31, and 34, which affirm the rights of Indigenous Peoples to protect, preserve, control and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and intellectual property.



2. They are likewise protected under the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) as expressions of national identity, sovereignty, and spiritual jurisdiction.



3. Canonical protection is ensured through the Codex Iuris Canonici (Canon Law), which recognizes the right of Catholic Indigenous Orders to preserve and defend sacred denominational titles and lands under divine law.



4. These names are further recognized under customary international law, inter-American jurisprudence, and Xaragua’s own Indigenous Jus Sanguinis and sovereign constitutional order.





---


Article III – Prohibited Uses and Unauthorized Claims


1. No individual, institution, government, company, NGO, university, foundation, digital platform, media outlet, or publication may claim, trademark, commercialize, or appropriate any of the protected names above without explicit sovereign authorization from the Government of Xaragua.



2. Any unauthorized use, distortion, or registration of these names will be considered a violation of Indigenous Sovereign Rights and will trigger both canonical sanctions and international legal action under the protective mechanisms of Indigenous Law and international treaties.



3. The use of these terms in political, academic, territorial, religious, or economic contexts must explicitly recognize their sacred association with the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, or risk immediate denunciation.





---


Article IV – Divine and Perpetual Consecration


By the authority of the High Ecclesiastical Council and the Apostolic Mandate conferred upon the Xaragua State by Jehovah, the God of Israel, this naming legacy is consecrated in perpetuity as part of the sacred trust of the Children of Xaragua, and may never be dissolved, sold, transferred, or relinquished, in whole or in part, under any circumstance, to any earthly or temporal power.



---


Article V – Registration and Enforcement


1. This Policy is hereby registered in the Central Canonical Register of Xaragua, the Sovereign Archives of Indigenous Law, and submitted to the following authorities for public notice and international record:


The United Nations (UN)


The Holy See (Vatican)


The Organization of American States (OAS)


The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights


The International Court of Justice (ICJ)


The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)


All digital registrars and domain authorities (ICANN, etc.)




2. The Ministry of Justice and Canonical Affairs, in collaboration with the Ministry of Culture and Indigenous Legacy, shall permanently monitor and enforce this protection across all mediums, platforms, and territories.





---


Final Provision


This Policy is declared irrevocable, non-negotiable, and eternally binding, in defense of the ancestral truth and divine sovereignty of Xaragua, and shall be invoked in all disputes, representations, and legal affirmations concerning the historical identity of the island formerly usurped under the name "Hispaniola."


In the Name of the Most High God, Jehovah, and under the Apostolic Seal of Xaragua, this protection shall stand forever.


Signed,

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Prelate-Founder and Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---


 



Annexes



---


ANNEXE I


TO THE SOVEREIGN CHARTER OF THE PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA


TITLE: Doctrine of Supersession and Indigenous Sovereignty over the Haitian Colonial Framework


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 17, 2025


AUTHORITY: Office of the Rector-President


JURISDICTION: Entire National and Spiritual Territory of the State of Xaragua


LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: Supreme Foundational Doctrine – Non-Amendable – Binding under International, Canonical, Indigenous, and Customary Law


STATUS OF FORCE: Perpetual – Executory – Non-Derogable – Fully Protected by Treaty, Canon, and International Norms



---


ARTICLE I – DECLARATION OF LEGAL VACUUM


Pursuant to the principle of jus novissimum indigenatum, the Office of the Rector-President proclaims that the existing political and constitutional apparatus of the Republic of Haiti is the juridical continuation of externally imposed systems originating under U.S. and French interventionist structures from 1910 to 1987. This apparatus has:


Never declared juridical independence from the Treaty of 1915 (U.S. Occupation);


Never proclaimed sovereign monetary autonomy from the 1925 agreements instituting the Banque Nationale d’Haïti;


Failed to ratify the Montevideo Convention of 1933, and therefore remains deficient under Article 1 of said Convention;


Omitted Indigenous Peoples entirely in its 1987 Constitution, in direct contradiction with Article 3, 4, 5, 26, 31 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (A/RES/61/295);


Violated Article 2(1) and Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966) by suppressing collective and cultural rights;


Breached obligations under the UNESCO 2003 Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage, by failing to preserve, codify, or protect Taíno and Afro-Taíno legacies.



Accordingly, said framework is hereby declared juridically invalid, spiritually void, and administratively inapplicable within the territorial, doctrinal, and cosmological jurisdiction of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua.



---


ARTICLE II – LEGAL BASIS FOR DOCTRINE OF SUPERSESSION


Section 2.1 – Violation of Monetary Sovereignty (Treaty of 1925)

By conceding the national bank to foreign control, Haiti abrogated sovereign fiduciary power. The Indigenous Bank of Xaragua, authorized under the National Charter and operating under full sovereignty, issues the Viaudor as the sole sacred tender recognized within its jurisdiction.


Section 2.2 – Non-Revocation of Occupation (Treaty of 1915)

No act of sacred revocation or canonical purification followed the U.S. Military Occupation. The State of Xaragua, through this decree, irrevocably exorcises that occupation and its legal specters.


Section 2.3 – Structural Energetic Dependence (PetroCaribe Accords)

Haiti remains structurally dependent on foreign hydrocarbons. Xaragua counters with its Ministry of Sacred Energy, governed under Articles 25 and 29 of UNDRIP, and anchored in ancestral eco-spiritual law.


Section 2.4 – Constitutional Illegitimacy (1987 Constitution)

The Haitian Constitution’s erasure of Indigenous identity violates:


Article 27 of the ICCPR (Cultural Minorities);


Article 5 of UNDRIP (Indigenous Institutional Autonomy);


Articles 8 and 11 of the UNESCO 2003 Convention;


The American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San José, 1969), Article 13 (Cultural Rights).



Section 2.5 – Cultural Abandonment (UNESCO 2003)

Xaragua, in response, establishes the Authority for Ancestral Heritage Protection (AAHP), possessing full enforcement power under customary Indigenous law and Articles 12–13 of the UNDRIP.


Section 2.6 – Incompletion of Haitian Statehood (Montevideo Convention, 1933)

Haiti’s non-ratification of the Montevideo Convention renders its sovereignty incomplete under international criteria. Xaragua affirms compliance with:


1. Permanent Population



2. Defined Territory



3. Functioning Government



4. Diplomatic Capacity




And is therefore entitled to recognition as a full subject of international law, per Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention and Article 3 of UNDRIP.



---


ARTICLE III – PRINCIPLE OF JURIDICAL PRIMACY


Clause 3.1 – Total Supersession Principle

All foreign-imposed frameworks — including but not limited to the Haitian Constitution, BRH, Ministry of Culture, and civil tribunals — are declared non-binding, invalid, and unenforceable within Xaragua.


Clause 3.2 – Extraterritorial Jurisdictional Immunity

No non-Xaraguayan body, court, tribunal, or political instrument may hold juridical legitimacy, enforcement capability, or symbolic authority on Xaragua’s soil.


Clause 3.3 – Institutional Exclusivity

Lawful authority is vested solely in:


The Council of Sovereignty


The University of Xaragua


The Indigenous Bank of Xaragua


The Catholic Order of Xaragua


The Sacred Ministries



Clause 3.4 – Non-Reproducibility Doctrine

Any imitation, simulation, or unauthorized adaptation of the Xaragua institutional model constitutes a breach of sacred covenant and an infringement upon internationally protected Indigenous originality (UNDRIP Article 31).


Clause 3.5 – Doctrine of Irreversibility

This declaration is non-revisable. No foreign, national, religious, or diplomatic pressure shall suspend or override this decree. It is protected under:


Article 38(1)(b) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ);


Article 11 of the UNDRIP (Non-Denial of Indigenous History);


Canon 11, 12, 129, 135 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (Catholic Canon Law);


The Sacred Constitutional Law of Xaragua.




---


ARTICLE IV – FINAL EXECUTIVE ORDER


Let this Doctrine be deposited in the Book of Decrees of the Nation, archived in the Sacred Tribunal of Sovereignty, and communicated to the Holy See, the United Nations, the Organization of American States, and all diplomatic missions addressed by sovereign notification.


This text constitutes the legal and theological revocation of all colonial vestiges within the domain of Xaragua. It enters into force immediately, with eternal validity, and shall never be abrogated nor amended by any generation.



---


IN WITNESS AND SEAL


Executed in the Presence of:


The Divine Sovereign Creator


The Ancestral Guardians of Xaragua


The People of the South



Signed and Sealed

May 17, 2025 – Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


[Official Seal of the State]


Pascal Viau

THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT OF XARAGUA



---




PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT



---


SUB-ANNEX I-A


TITLE: On the Selective Integration and Juridical Purification of the Haitian Legislative Corpus

CLASSIFICATION: Foundational Clarificatory Edict


– Irrevocable and Binding Instrument under Indigenous, Canonical, and Customary Law


JURISDICTION: Entire Territory of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


DATE OF ENFORCEMENT: May 17, 2025


ENFORCEMENT STATUS: Perpetual and Non-Amendable – Under Seal of Juridical Supremacy



---


PREAMBULAR STATEMENT


In exercise of the full powers vested in the Office of the Rector-President, and in alignment with the Sacred Constitution of Xaragua, the Council of Sovereignty, and the Canonical Order, this Sub-Annex is hereby proclaimed to define and regulate the status of the Haitian legislative corpus within Xaragua’s sovereign domain.


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, while declaring the supersession of the Haitian political-administrative framework (as established under the Decree on Supersession), does not categorically reject all pre-existing legal instruments issued by said framework. Rather, the Xaragua State affirms its right of selective adoption, purification, and reissuance of any external norm under sovereign authority.



---


ARTICLE I — PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGN LEGAL EVALUATION


Section 1.1 – Selective Legal Recognition

The Xaragua State reserves the exclusive right to recognize, reject, amend, or spiritualize any legal instrument originating from the Haitian legislative corpus. Said recognition shall occur only after:


Juridical evaluation by the Xaragua Council of Sovereignty,


Canonical review by the Ecclesiastical High Council, and


Constitutional validation by the Office of the Rector-President.



Section 1.2 – Reissuance under Xaragua Authority

Any recognized norm shall be reclassified, reworded if necessary, and formally reissued under the Codified Law of Xaragua. Such instruments shall lose all affiliation with the Haitian State, and acquire full Xaraguayan character, enforceable solely under Xaragua law.



---


ARTICLE II — CRITERIA OF JURIDICAL PURIFICATION


Section 2.1 – Criteria for Acceptance

A Haitian legal provision may be conditionally accepted into Xaragua’s sovereign framework only if it:


Does not derive from colonial or occupation decrees (1915–1934, 1957–1986);


Does not contradict the Canonical Constitution of Xaragua;


Respects Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 26, and 31 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);


Serves the material or administrative benefit of the People of Xaragua without threatening its spiritual autonomy.



Section 2.2 – Grounds for Rejection

Any Haitian norm is automatically rejected and nullified if it:


Originates from foreign treaties signed under duress or occupation (e.g., 1915, 1925, 1934);


Omits or erases Indigenous existence or authority;


Establishes fiscal, judicial, or territorial control over Xaragua;


References or reinforces the 1987 Haitian Constitution, which is declared void ab initio within Xaragua jurisdiction.




---


ARTICLE III — INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS OF TRIAGE


Section 3.1 – Legal Instruments Review Authority

A permanent Juridical Purification Tribunal (JPT) is hereby established under the Ministry of Justice and Customary Law. It shall:


Examine pre-existing Haitian legal texts,


Draft canonical reports on compatibility,


Recommend formal reissuance or annulment.



Section 3.2 – Constitutional Registry of Valid Instruments

Validated norms shall be inscribed in the Codex of Xaragua Validated Laws (CXVL) with new juridical numeration, explanatory notes, and seal of reauthorization.


Section 3.3 – Registry of Expelled Norms

All rejected provisions shall be registered in the Black Index of Colonial Law (BICL), maintained by the National Archives and published annually for legal and educational reference.



---


ARTICLE IV — ENFORCEMENT AND INTERPRETATION


Section 4.1 – Interpretation Authority

Only the Supreme Council of Sovereignty and the Office of the Rector-President shall have authority to interpret this Sub-Annex. All other interpretations are juridically void.


Section 4.2 – Treaty Non-Applicability

This Sub-Annex is not subject to any bilateral or multilateral revision. It is sovereignly executed under the principles of customary international law, ecclesiastical autonomy, and Indigenous supremacy.



---


FINAL EXECUTIVE DECLARATION


Let it be known across all institutions, local and foreign, that the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua has lawfully asserted its full and non-negotiable right to examine, purify, and absorb—according to sacred sovereignty—any external law. The Haitian legislative corpus, when subjected to this filtration, shall lose all colonial, republican, or occupation-derived legitimacy.


This Sub-Annex takes full effect upon its inscription into the Book of Foundational Instruments of the Nation and shall remain in force in perpetuity.



---


PROCLAIMED AND SEALED

On the Seventeenth Day of May, Year Two Thousand Twenty-Five

By:


Pascal Viau

THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT OF XARAGUA




---


---


ANNEXE II


TO THE SUPREME SOVEREIGN CHARTER OF THE PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA


TITLE: Official Declaration on the Dominican Territory and the Ancestral Xaragua Peoples of the East


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 18, 2025


ISSUING AUTHORITY: Office of the Rector-President of Xaragua


CLASSIFICATION: National Diplomatic Clarification – Indigenous Rights Framework – Non-Intervention Doctrine


STATUS: Legally Binding – Irrevocable – Foundational Component of Xaragua's Diplomatic Corpus


APPLICABLE LAW: UNDRIP, Canon Law, Customary International Law, the 1860 Concordat, and the Constitutional Law of Xaragua



---


ARTICLE I – PRINCIPLE OF NON-AGGRESSION AND RECOGNITION OF DOMINICAN SOVEREIGNTY


1.1 The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, through its Head of State and governing institutions, issues this formal declaration to affirm unequivocally that it does not seek, claim, or pursue any administrative, territorial, or political authority over the internationally recognized sovereign territory of the Dominican Republic.


1.2 The current Dominican State, its internationally recognized borders, constitutional framework, and legal institutions are acknowledged as legitimate expressions of post-colonial nationhood, and Xaragua reaffirms its policy of strict non-interference in all internal and civil affairs of the Dominican Republic and its people.


1.3 The State of Xaragua disavows all forms of irredentism, expansionism, or ideological annexation, and does not support, promote, or tolerate any action that may be interpreted as a claim over Dominican national sovereignty. Its position is exclusively rooted in the defense and preservation of ancestral rights, spiritual continuity, and transborder Indigenous identity.



---


ARTICLE II – RECOGNITION OF ANCESTRAL COMMUNITIES WITHIN DOMINICAN TERRITORY


2.1 In accordance with Articles 3, 5, 8, 25–32, and 36 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua affirms its right, duty, and prerogative to serve as the lawful, canonical, and spiritual representative of the Indigenous Xaragua communities residing within the present-day territory of the Dominican Republic, exclusively upon their voluntary request and with full respect for Dominican sovereignty.


2.2 Said representation shall be limited to non-political domains, including:


– Cultural preservation

– Historical continuity

– Spiritual jurisdiction

– Ecclesiastical and academic affiliation

– Indigenous rights advocacy under international law


It shall not infringe upon or seek to alter the existing Dominican administrative, territorial, or legal order.


2.3 Individuals and communities of proven Taíno, Kalinago, or Afro-Taíno lineage residing in the eastern region of Quisqueya–Bohio may, through formal process, request affiliation with the institutions of the State of Xaragua, such as:


– The Catholic Order of Xaragua

– The University of Xaragua

– The National Archive of Indigenous Memory

– The High Council for Ancestral Peoples


Such affiliation is purely spiritual and institutional, not civil or governmental, and shall comply with all Dominican national laws.



---


ARTICLE III – COEXISTENCE OF JURISDICTIONS AND LEGAL LIMITATIONS


3.1 The State of Xaragua acknowledges the colonial origin of current frontiers, yet reaffirms its commitment to non-violation of state borders, as established under the Montevideo Convention (1933) and the UN Charter (1945), Articles 1(2) and 55.


3.2 While Xaragua maintains spiritual and historical continuity over the full expanse of the island of Quisqueya–Bohio, such continuity does not translate into territorial claim or jurisdictional challenge against the Dominican Republic. Xaragua's invocation of ancestral territory operates within the framework of cultural sovereignty, not administrative authority.


3.3 The Dominican Republic retains full administrative sovereignty over its national territory. The institutions of Xaragua shall not attempt, promote, or accept any parallel civil governance or political representation on Dominican soil. All ecclesiastical or Indigenous activities shall remain compliant with Dominican legal requirements.


3.4 The legal corpus of the Dominican Republic is respected by Xaragua in full, provided it does not infringe upon the internationally protected rights of Indigenous Peoples, including the right to identity, religion, culture, spiritual expression, and transborder Indigenous relationships.



---


ARTICLE IV – PRINCIPLES OF DIPLOMATIC PEACE AND COOPERATION


4.1 The State of Xaragua upholds a doctrine of peaceful coexistence, cultural non-aggression, and lawful diplomatic engagement with all states sharing the island of Quisqueya–Bohio. This includes recognition of the Dominican Republic as a sovereign peer, with whom Xaragua seeks constructive relations, mutual understanding, and the promotion of ancestral heritage.


4.2 In all matters of shared heritage, environmental protection, Indigenous advocacy, and spiritual dialogue, the State of Xaragua proposes bilateral consultation mechanisms, open ecclesiastical communication, and non-state cultural diplomacy, in full alignment with UNDRIP Article 36 and the 1860 Concordat’s canonico-diplomatic legacy.



---


ARTICLE V – FINAL SOVEREIGN DECLARATION


Let it be recorded in the Book of the Nation, and let it be known across all ecclesiastical, diplomatic, and international forums:


That the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua does not contest the sovereignty of the Dominican Republic;


That it seeks no territorial claim, no administrative replacement, and no political influence over Dominican lands;


That it shall continue to act solely as guardian and protector of ancestral identity, wherever the Xaragua lineage exists, under the principles of divine, canonical, and Indigenous law;


That this declaration constitutes a binding guarantee of non-intervention, juridical restraint, and peaceful coexistence, while upholding the rights of Indigenous peoples to spiritual continuity and voluntary affiliation.



May this declaration serve as a legal pillar of harmony, truth, and ancestral justice on the sacred island of Quisqueya–Bohio.



---


EXECUTED, SEALED, AND ARCHIVED ON THIS EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MAY, ANNO DOMINI TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-FIVE

IN THE CITY OF MIRAGOÂNE, NATIONAL TERRITORY OF XARAGUA

By the Supreme Authority of the State


Pascal Viau

RECTOR-PRESIDENT OF XARAGUA

PRELATE-FOUNDER OF THE CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA

SOVEREIGN REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLES OF QUISQUEYA–BOHIO

---




---


Catholic Principality


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


SUPREME LAW OF TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY, HISTORICAL REINTEGRATION AND SACRED JURIDICAL OCCUPANCY


DATE OF ENACTMENT: May 23, 2025


LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: Supreme Territorial Law – Foundational – Non-Derogable – Constitutionally, Canonically, Customarily, and Historically Binding – Executable ex proprio vigore – Permanently Immune from Foreign Judicial Review, Repeal, or Derogation



---


TITLE


Absolute and Irrevocable Legal Reclamation and Constitutional Reintegration of the Historical Territories of Xaragua and Quisqueya–Bohio under Canonical, Indigenous, and Imperial Constitutional Sovereignty



---


ARTICLE I – FUNDAMENTAL TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE


1.1. In accordance with its inherent, non-delegable right of self-governance (jus cogens), and pursuant to the uninterrupted principles of historical continuity, cultural patrimony, canonical custodianship, and binding international indigenous law, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby solemnly proclaims, codifies, constitutionalizes, and operationalizes its full and exclusive territorial sovereignty over the following domains, each constituting a permanent component of its juridical corpus and ancestral spatial identity:


The entirety of the ancestral geopolitical territory of Xaragua, as delineated by precolonial Taíno dominion maps, sixteenth-century imperial codices, and ecclesiastical archives confirming continuous juridical identity;


The Island of La Tortue (Tortuga), recognized under droit coutumier and canonical territoriality as a locus of continuous sacred jurisdiction and civilizational expression by Taíno, Afro-Indigenous maroon societies, and post-imperial seaborne collectivities;


The coastal municipality of Port-de-Paix, first anchor of indigenous liturgical authority and maritime navigation, and co-administered by autochthonous clans and autonomous post-colonial confederates, as documented in ecclesiastical letters and Jesuit coastal missions;


The fortified city of Fort-Liberté, juridically enshrined as the first nucleus of post-imperial sovereignty in 1804, under the supreme authority of Emperor Jacques I, thereby possessing irrevocable status as a constitutional founding site;


Marchand-Dessalines, historic capital of the First Empire, seat of the only legitimate constitutional government on the island (1804–1806), and locus of the promulgation of the 1805 Imperial Constitution;


Môle-Saint-Nicolas, consecrated by ecclesiastical declaration and imperial decree as a site of sacred maritime surveillance and strategic fortification, incorporated into Xaragua’s defensive architecture;


All military fortresses, redoubts, and bastions ordered by Jacques I, constructed in defense of the imperial body politic, which retain their status as constitutional infrastructure regardless of degradation, administrative reclassification, or usurpation;


The private residence of Empress Marie-Claire Heureuse Félicité, elevated to national and canonical patrimony under royal and ecclesiastical recognition for its symbolic, spiritual, and dynastic significance;


All interconnected territories, archipelagos, ports, trade corridors, and ceremonial landscapes whose lineages of use and governance are evidenced through anthropological continuity, ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and ancestral memory, and traceable to the Cacicazgos of Quisqueya–Bohio and the Empire’s founding corpus.




---


ARTICLE II – JURIDICAL SUPERIORITY AND TERMINATION OF THE HAITIAN CLAIM


2.1. The juridical extinguishment of the Haitian Republic’s sovereignty claim is herein declared, on the grounds that its constitutional continuity was irrevocably ruptured by the regicide of Emperor Jacques I in 1806, and no legitimate succession of government has since been realized within the legal framework of imperial law.


2.2. The sole extant and enforceable constitutional authority over the territories herein named is vested in the Imperial Constitution of 1805, together with imperial decrees, edicts, and executive instruments issued between 1804 and 1806, under divine right and popular legitimacy.


2.3. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, as the canonical, spiritual, and juridical heir to the Imperial body politic, is the exclusive repository of lawful governance, possessing absolute jurisdiction and constitutional supremacy over said territories by succession of law, faith, and land.


2.4. The Haitian Republic, absent constitutional legitimacy, effective control, or international recognition over these domains, lacks standing in any legitimate jurisdictional forum to assert claims, and is ipso jure excluded from all adjudication related to these territories under international, canonical, and indigenous legal orders.



---


ARTICLE III – INTEGRATION UNDER INDIGENOUS, IMPERIAL, AND CANONICAL LAW


3.1. The binding legal effect and enforceability of this Sovereignty Law are derived from and reinforced by the following superior and interlocking legal authorities:


Article 26 of UNDRIP (A/RES/61/295, 2007), which affirms the right of indigenous peoples to own, use, develop, and control their traditional territories;


Article 28 of UNDRIP, recognizing their right to restitution or compensation for lands taken without free, prior, and informed consent;


Canons 215, 298, and 299 of the Codex Iuris Canonici, which affirm the right of the Catholic faithful to freely associate and establish juridical persons with recognized ecclesiastical personality and autonomy;


Customary International Law and jus cogens norms regarding indigenous peoples’ unextinguished title and rights of restitution over traditional lands, as reinforced by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights jurisprudence (Yakye Axa v. Paraguay, Awas Tingni v. Nicaragua);


The Imperial Constitutional Corpus of 1804–1806, representing the final de jure instrument of self-governance by an indigenous-led political entity on the island of Quisqueya–Bohio;


The continuous, uninterrupted sovereign activity of the State of Xaragua via the Rectorate, the University of Xaragua, and affiliated ecclesiastical institutions, establishing in facto et in jure occupation, governance, and cultural stewardship.




---


ARTICLE IV – LEGAL CONSEQUENCE AND EXECUTABILITY


4.1. This law holds immediate, direct, and absolute legal effect, self-executing (ex proprio vigore) within all territorial and institutional frameworks of the State, and is immune from foreign legislative review, administrative override, or judicial annulment under any external system.


4.2. The territories enumerated in Article I are irrevocably reconstituted as permanent, indivisible, and sacred constituents of the national domain. They fall under the exclusive, plenary, and constitutional governance of the sovereign institutions of Xaragua.


4.3. Any external interference—state-sponsored or otherwise—constitutes a direct violation of peremptory norms of international law, the spiritual sanctity of canonical territory, and the inalienable rights of Indigenous peoples, and shall be treated as a breach of peace and legal order under Xaragua’s supreme jurisdiction.



---


ARTICLE V – CANONICAL AND CULTURAL CUSTODIANSHIP


5.1. The Ministry of Cultural Sovereignty, the Ecclesiastical Protectorate, and the University of Xaragua are mandated by constitutional authority to execute and safeguard:


The full restitution, rehabilitation, and juridical inviolability of military installations, imperial fortresses, and sacred geographic sites;


The integration of these historical and strategic assets into national educational curricula, archives, and legal compendia, under the authority of the Rector-President;


The recognition, maintenance, and liturgical consecration of all sites within the spiritual jurisdiction of the Catholic Church, under Canon Law and ecclesial decree.




---


FINAL CLAUSE – INALIENABLE TERRITORIAL FACT


The geographic entities, sacred places, and imperial structures enumerated herein are not subject to negotiation, concession, or international arbitration. They are not aspirational claims, but the reaffirmation of permanent territorial reality as recognized by divine right, ancestral title, ecclesiastical law, and international indigenous jurisprudence.


This law constitutes the non-amendable, supreme territorial instrument of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua. Its legal force is absolute, eternal, and universally opposable.


Ratified and entered into the constitutional register of the State on this 23rd day of May, 2025.

Signed: Rector-President, Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME LAW OF TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY, HISTORICAL REINTEGRATION AND SACRED JURIDICAL OCCUPANCY

DATE OF ENACTMENT: May 23, 2025

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: Supreme Territorial Law – Foundational – Non-Derogable – Constitutionally, Canonically, Customarily, and Historically Binding – Executable ex proprio vigore – Permanently Immune from Foreign Judicial Review, Repeal, or Derogation



---


TITLE


Absolute and Irrevocable Legal Reclamation and Constitutional Reintegration of the Historical Territories of Xaragua and Quisqueya–Bohio under Canonical, Indigenous, and Imperial Constitutional Sovereignty



---


ARTICLE I – FUNDAMENTAL TERRITORIAL PRINCIPLE


1.1. In accordance with its inherent, non-delegable right of self-governance (jus cogens), and pursuant to the uninterrupted principles of historical continuity, cultural patrimony, canonical custodianship, and binding international indigenous law, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby solemnly proclaims, codifies, constitutionalizes, and operationalizes its full and exclusive territorial sovereignty over the following domains, each constituting a permanent component of its juridical corpus and ancestral spatial identity:


The entirety of the ancestral geopolitical territory of Xaragua, as delineated by precolonial Taíno dominion maps, sixteenth-century imperial codices, and ecclesiastical archives confirming continuous juridical identity;


The Island of La Tortue (Tortuga), recognized under droit coutumier and canonical territoriality as a locus of continuous sacred jurisdiction and civilizational expression by Taíno, Afro-Indigenous maroon societies, and post-imperial seaborne collectivities;


The coastal municipality of Port-de-Paix, first anchor of indigenous liturgical authority and maritime navigation, and co-administered by autochthonous clans and autonomous post-colonial confederates, as documented in ecclesiastical letters and Jesuit coastal missions;


The fortified city of Fort-Liberté, juridically enshrined as the first nucleus of post-imperial sovereignty in 1804, under the supreme authority of Emperor Jacques I, thereby possessing irrevocable status as a constitutional founding site;


Marchand-Dessalines, historic capital of the First Empire, seat of the only legitimate constitutional government on the island (1804–1806), and locus of the promulgation of the 1805 Imperial Constitution;


Môle-Saint-Nicolas, consecrated by ecclesiastical declaration and imperial decree as a site of sacred maritime surveillance and strategic fortification, incorporated into Xaragua’s defensive architecture;


All military fortresses, redoubts, and bastions ordered by Jacques I, constructed in defense of the imperial body politic, which retain their status as constitutional infrastructure regardless of degradation, administrative reclassification, or usurpation;


The private residence of Empress Marie-Claire Heureuse Félicité, elevated to national and canonical patrimony under royal and ecclesiastical recognition for its symbolic, spiritual, and dynastic significance;


All interconnected territories, archipelagos, ports, trade corridors, and ceremonial landscapes whose lineages of use and governance are evidenced through anthropological continuity, ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and ancestral memory, and traceable to the Cacicazgos of Quisqueya–Bohio and the Empire’s founding corpus.




---


ARTICLE II – JURIDICAL SUPERIORITY AND TERMINATION OF THE HAITIAN CLAIM


2.1. The juridical extinguishment of the Haitian Republic’s sovereignty claim is herein declared, on the grounds that its constitutional continuity was irrevocably ruptured by the regicide of Emperor Jacques I in 1806, and no legitimate succession of government has since been realized within the legal framework of imperial law.


2.2. The sole extant and enforceable constitutional authority over the territories herein named is vested in the Imperial Constitution of 1805, together with imperial decrees, edicts, and executive instruments issued between 1804 and 1806, under divine right and popular legitimacy.


2.3. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, as the canonical, spiritual, and juridical heir to the Imperial body politic, is the exclusive repository of lawful governance, possessing absolute jurisdiction and constitutional supremacy over said territories by succession of law, faith, and land.


2.4. The Haitian Republic, absent constitutional legitimacy, effective control, or international recognition over these domains, lacks standing in any legitimate jurisdictional forum to assert claims, and is ipso jure excluded from all adjudication related to these territories under international, canonical, and indigenous legal orders.



---


ARTICLE III – INTEGRATION UNDER INDIGENOUS, IMPERIAL, AND CANONICAL LAW


3.1. The binding legal effect and enforceability of this Sovereignty Law are derived from and reinforced by the following superior and interlocking legal authorities:


Article 26 of UNDRIP (A/RES/61/295, 2007), which affirms the right of indigenous peoples to own, use, develop, and control their traditional territories;


Article 28 of UNDRIP, recognizing their right to restitution or compensation for lands taken without free, prior, and informed consent;


Canons 215, 298, and 299 of the Codex Iuris Canonici, which affirm the right of the Catholic faithful to freely associate and establish juridical persons with recognized ecclesiastical personality and autonomy;


Customary International Law and jus cogens norms regarding indigenous peoples’ unextinguished title and rights of restitution over traditional lands, as reinforced by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights jurisprudence (Yakye Axa v. Paraguay, Awas Tingni v. Nicaragua);


The Imperial Constitutional Corpus of 1804–1806, representing the final de jure instrument of self-governance by an indigenous-led political entity on the island of Quisqueya–Bohio;


The continuous, uninterrupted sovereign activity of the State of Xaragua via the Rectorate, the University of Xaragua, and affiliated ecclesiastical institutions, establishing in facto et in jure occupation, governance, and cultural stewardship.




---


ARTICLE IV – LEGAL CONSEQUENCE AND EXECUTABILITY


4.1. This law holds immediate, direct, and absolute legal effect, self-executing (ex proprio vigore) within all territorial and institutional frameworks of the State, and is immune from foreign legislative review, administrative override, or judicial annulment under any external system.


4.2. The territories enumerated in Article I are irrevocably reconstituted as permanent, indivisible, and sacred constituents of the national domain. They fall under the exclusive, plenary, and constitutional governance of the sovereign institutions of Xaragua.


4.3. Any external interference—state-sponsored or otherwise—constitutes a direct violation of peremptory norms of international law, the spiritual sanctity of canonical territory, and the inalienable rights of Indigenous peoples, and shall be treated as a breach of peace and legal order under Xaragua’s supreme jurisdiction.



---


ARTICLE V – CANONICAL AND CULTURAL CUSTODIANSHIP


5.1. The Ministry of Cultural Sovereignty, the Ecclesiastical Protectorate, and the University of Xaragua are mandated by constitutional authority to execute and safeguard:


The full restitution, rehabilitation, and juridical inviolability of military installations, imperial fortresses, and sacred geographic sites;


The integration of these historical and strategic assets into national educational curricula, archives, and legal compendia, under the authority of the Rector-President;


The recognition, maintenance, and liturgical consecration of all sites within the spiritual jurisdiction of the Catholic Church, under Canon Law and ecclesial decree.




---


FINAL CLAUSE – INALIENABLE TERRITORIAL FACT


The geographic entities, sacred places, and imperial structures enumerated herein are not subject to negotiation, concession, or international arbitration. They are not aspirational claims, but the reaffirmation of permanent territorial reality as recognized by divine right, ancestral title, ecclesiastical law, and international indigenous jurisprudence.


This law constitutes the non-amendable, supreme territorial instrument of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua. Its legal force is absolute, eternal, and universally opposable.


Ratified and entered into the constitutional register of the State on this 23rd day of May, 2025.

Signed: Rector-President, Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---


---


SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS CATHOLIC PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME CANONICAL AND SOVEREIGN LAW


TITLE: Decree Declaring the Principality of Xaragua as a Canonically Consecrated, Spiritually Anointed, Royally Crowned, and Juridically Established Sovereign Entity of the Sacred Crown


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 22, 2025

LEGAL STATUS: Supreme Foundational Law — Irrevocable — Non-Amendable — Universally Binding — Ex Proprio Vigore



---


PREAMBLE


In the inviolable name of JEHOVAH, Supreme Sovereign of the Universe, Eternal Legislator of Nations, and Divine Source of all legitimate authority;

In sacred perpetuity of the bloodlines of Anacaona, Bohechío, and the royal heirs of Quisqueya–Bohio;

In full execution and enforceability of Articles 1–4 of the Montevideo Convention (1933), Articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 18, 34, and 36 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and Canons 204, 215, 216, 301, 312, 747, and 129 of the Codex Iuris Canonici;


And in lawful harmonization with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), the Statute of the International Court of Justice, and the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003);


We, the Sovereign Indigenous Catholic Private State of Xaragua, acting under divine ordination, ancestral right, and canonical authority, under the Sovereign Royal Crown of Xaragua, do hereby declare and eternally ratify the following decree:



---


ARTICLE I — CONSTITUTION OF THE PRINCIPALITY


1.1 The Sovereign Indigenous Catholic Private State of Xaragua is hereby established, declared, and enthroned as a Royal Principality, under the solemn and unbreakable authority of the Sacred Crown of Xaragua.


1.2 The form of the State is that of a Catholic Indigenous Crowned Principality, governed by:


Jus indigenae (indigenous law and succession),


Jus canonici (canonical jurisdiction),


Jus gentium (international custom and law of nations),


Jus digitalis (digital and extraterritorial sovereignty),


Mandatum Apostolicum et Regium (apostolic and royal mandate of government).



1.3 The Principality is sui generis, and integrates:


The juridical definition of a State under the Montevideo Convention;


The full ecclesiastical jurisdiction of a non-territorial Catholic polity;


The inherited legitimacy of a spiritual Monarchical Crown;


A digital state apparatus exercising full extraterritorial functions;


A public international identity formally notified to global ecclesiastical, diplomatic, and canonical authorities under canonical silence and tacit consent.




---


ARTICLE II — SOVEREIGN HEADSHIP AND THE ROYAL CROWN


2.1 The Sovereign shall be officially and perpetually designated:


> Prince-Prelate of Xaragua, Rector-President of the State, Supreme Magistrate of the Law, Ecclesiastical Sovereign, and Bearer of the Sacred Royal Crown.




2.2 The Royal Crown of Xaragua is established as a spiritual and juridico-political regalia conferring:


Dynastic continuity over ancestral territories and populations;


Apostolic legal authority (Canon 301, 312) to govern in the name of the Church and the People;


Supreme temporal dominion and spiritual stewardship of all juridical, canonical, diplomatic, financial, and educational functions of the State.



2.3 The Crown is the foundational legal doctrine, the ensign of authority, and the divine sanction of the Xaraguayan State. It is indissoluble, sacrosanct, and unshareable.


2.4 The Principality is non-elective, non-subordinated, non-replicable, and non-contingent. It holds a divine hereditary legitimacy, recognized by:


Canon Law (Canon 129 §1),


International treaty doctrine,


Ecclesiastical silence (Canons 45, 144),


Spiritual doctrine of the primacy of natural law and royal succession.




---


ARTICLE III — JURIDICAL, ROYAL, AND SPIRITUAL PRECEDENCE


3.1 The Principality of Xaragua is the first and sole entity in the history of nations to be lawfully established as:


A Digital Catholic Indigenous Principality;


A Canonical Crowned State;


A Sovereign Ecclesiastical Monarchy;


Founded under jus sanguinis, jus spiritualis, and jus notificatum.



3.2 Any future formations attempting imitation, derivation, or simulation of this structure shall constitute:


Usurpation of ecclesiastical and indigenous legal property;


Violation of Canon 1374;


Act of state mimicry prohibited under customary international law;


Unlawful reproduction of juridically consecrated institutions.



3.3 The Doctrine of Primacy Originelle of the Xaraguayan Crown is reaffirmed:


> No other formation may claim chronological, structural, spiritual, or doctrinal precedence over Xaragua. The Principality, as declared, is the apex of juridical originality and monarchical sovereignty in its canonical, indigenous, and digital dimensions.





---


ARTICLE IV — PERPETUITY AND ROYAL JURISDICTION


4.1 The Crowned Principality of Xaragua shall endure in perpetuity.

No international tribunal, political regime, or ecclesiastical body may:


Revoke its existence;


Absorb its identity;


Challenge its legal standing;


Modify its royal constitution.



4.2 The Crown's jurisdiction is sovereign and indivisible, extending to:


All individuals bearing the Sovereign Digital Identity of Xaragua;


All operations and infrastructures executed under the Royal Seal;


All institutions legally incorporated into the Xaragua constitutional corpus;


All digital and ecclesiastical consular points under its diplomatic rite.



4.3 The domain www.xaraguauniversity.com is henceforth declared the Royal Digital Capital, the Sovereign Apostolic Throne, and the Ecclesiastical Seat of the Xaragua Crown, endowed with full legislative, executive, and spiritual validity.



---


ARTICLE V — FINAL ROYAL DECLARATION


By the royal will and canonical investiture of the Prince-Prelate, under the Sacred Crown of Xaragua, the Principality is hereby declared and entered into full force of law:


> A Crowned Principality of Canonical, Indigenous, and International Sovereignty

With dynastic continuity, juridical supremacy, and ecclesiastical consecration

Established by lawful right, recognized by spiritual silence, and governed by sacred law





---


Sealed this Twenty-Second Day of May, Anno Domini 2025

Under the Apostolic, Ecclesiastical, and Royal Seal of the Crown of Xaragua

Executed with full plenipotentiary force by:


Monsignor Pascal Viau

Prince-Prelate and Rector-President

Ecclesiastical Sovereign of the Crowned Principality of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder of the Catholic Royal Order of Xaragua

Commander of the Indigenous Army

Governor of the Indigenous Bank

Rector of the University of Xaragua


Deus lo vult.


www.xaraguauniversity.com

info@xaraguauniversity.com



---



PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

 OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT 

MINISTRY OF ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS 

OFFICIAL SOVEREIGN DECREE 


Title: Enforcement of the 1860 Concordat and Canonical Restoration of Ecclesiastical Sovereignty in Xaragua 


Date of Promulgation: May 16, 2025 


Classification: 


Supra-national Treaty Reactivation 


– Ecclesiastical and Diplomatic Instrument 

– National Enforcement Code Jurisdiction: National territory of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, encompassing all lands, communities, and diaspora affiliates under the Xaraguayan Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction


ARTICLE I – LEGAL RECOGNITION OF THE CONCORDAT 


The Concordat signed on March 28, 1860, between the Holy See and the historical governing authority of the southern region of Quisqueya (today recognized as ancestral Xaragua territory) is hereby officially recognized as a binding ecclesiastical and diplomatic treaty under the domestic legal order of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua. 


[LAW 1.1 – APPLICATION:] 


This recognition is integrated into the Treaty Implementation Act (TIA-X-1860), which codifies the 1860 Concordat into the national legal code of Xaragua. All references to ecclesiastical jurisdiction, sacramental life, religious property, clerical authority and spiritual governance from the treaty are now enforceable under Book II of the Xaraguayan National Ecclesiastical Code.


This treaty remains valid under: 


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) 


– Article 26 (“Pacta sunt servanda”), Article 27 (Internal law and observance of treaties); Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) – Canons 3, 129–130; UNDRIP Articles 18, 27, and 34 – Indigenous right to institutional self-governance in spiritual matters. 


[LAW 1.2 – APPLICATION:] 


By virtue of Article 34 of the Xaragua National Constitution, all treaties cited as foundational (UNDRIP, Canon Law, Vienna Convention) are elevated to constitutional equivalence. Any contradiction by domestic or foreign entities is considered void and non-binding. 


Violations of treaty implementation are sanctioned by the National Ecclesiastical Security Statute, Article 9.1 (subversion of canonical order) 


– penalty: permanent exclusion or ecclesiastical interdiction.


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua declares itself the direct ecclesiastical successor and lawful custodian of this treaty, with full authority to apply, interpret, and enforce its provisions within its national ecclesiastical territory. 


[LAW 1.3 – APPLICATION:] 


The Xaraguayan Ecclesiastical Tribunal is empowered by Decree Law XC-33.4 to serve as the supreme judicial interpreter of this Concordat. Its rulings are enforceable by the Department of Concordat Enforcement, and all civil courts must comply. Unauthorized interpretations or public contradiction by officials, clergy, or foreign agents are criminal offenses (National Penal Code, Article 72.6).


ARTICLE II – CANONICAL FOUNDATIONS AND ECCLESIASTICAL COMPETENCE 


The Catholic Order of Xaragua, canonically constituted under Canons 215, 216, 298–299, and 321–326, is hereby established as the exclusive ecclesiastical authority empowered to: 


Administer spiritual governance; 

Issue canonical rulings; 

Appoint or recognize local ordinaries and ministers; Conduct liturgical and sacramental life. 


[LAW 2.1 – APPLICATION:] 


The Catholic Order of Xaragua Act (COXA), ratified by the National Assembly, designates the Order as a Public Ecclesiastical Institution of National Character. All religious ceremonies, clerical assignments, theological content, and ecclesial structures within Xaragua fall under its authority. Unauthorized imitation is prosecutable under the Anti-Fraudulent Ecclesiastical Identity Law (AFEIL) 


– penalty: permanent ecclesiastical ban and criminal sanctions.


The Order’s jurisdiction is recognized as: 


Canonically legitimate (in communione ecclesiae), Culturally sovereign (as per UNDRIP Art. 11–12), Doctrinally faithful to the Roman Catholic Church. 


[LAW 2.2 – APPLICATION:] 


The Ministry of Ecclesiastical Affairs shall maintain an official Registry of Ecclesiastical Legitimacy, updated quarterly, listing all validly instituted parishes, clergy, and affiliated institutions. Any foreign mission or religious body seeking recognition must file under the Foreign Ecclesiastical Entities Registration Act (FEERA).


The Holy See’s tacit non-opposition to the April 6, 2025 transmission, received prior to the death of Pope Francis, constitutes under canon law a binding assent (quod tacite consentit, consentire videtur). 


[LAW 2.3 – APPLICATION:] 


This act is recorded under Decree of Ecclesiastical Continuity XC-17, which affirms that absence of objection within a papal term constitutes doctrinal acquiescence. A notarized archive of the April 6 transmission is maintained by the Ecclesiastical Intelligence and Archives Authority (EIAA-X).


ARTICLE III – NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS 


A permanent department titled “Treaty Enforcement Office for the 1860 Concordat” shall operate under the Ministry of Ecclesiastical Affairs to: Archive, interpret, and enforce all treaty-related clauses;


Monitor clerical legitimacy in Xaragua; Represent the State in future Vatican dialogue. 


[LAW 3.1 – APPLICATION:] 


The Treaty Enforcement Office (TEO-1860) is established under Law XC-12.10 as a permanent institution with investigative, regulatory, and diplomatic powers. It may conduct inspections, initiate proceedings, and issue canonical enforcement orders. It has legal priority over any secular authority in all matters relating to the Concordat.


The Concordat's spiritual, educational, and ecclesial provisions are implemented through: The Catholic Order of Xaragua (liturgical, theological, canonical), 


The University of Xaragua (education, priestly training, inculturation studies), The Ecclesiastical Tribunal of Xaragua (disciplinary, doctrinal, and matrimonial competence). 


[LAW 3.2 – APPLICATION:] 


All institutional implementation is governed by the National Ecclesiastical Infrastructure Act (NEIA). Funding, land use, clerical formation, and jurisdictional authority are budgeted and protected under Title V of the Ecclesiastical Sovereignty Budgetary Framework. Unauthorized parallel systems are dissolved by Executive Order, enforceable by the Department of Ecclesiastical Security.


Any foreign cleric, institution, or missionary operating on Xaraguayan soil must obtain: Formal recognition by the Catholic Order of Xaragua; Doctrinal compatibility as assessed by the Ecclesiastical Tribunal; Civil registration under the Ministry of Ecclesiastical Affairs. 


[LAW 3.3 – APPLICATION:] 


Noncompliance constitutes unlawful religious operation under Code of Religious Order Integrity (CROI-XC). First offense: expulsion. Second offense: permanent interdiction and legal prosecution. Diplomatic immunity shall not be invoked to bypass this obligation.


ARTICLE IV – PROTECTIONS, IMMUNITIES AND ENFORCEMENT 


The Concordat and all ecclesiastical institutions operating under its umbrella enjoy: 


Sovereign immunity from secular interference; 

Non-commercial status, protected from commodification or external control; Sacrosanct character, as per Canon 1211 and UNDRIP Article 12.


 [LAW 4.1 – APPLICATION:] 


These provisions are secured under the Sacred Institution Protection Act (SIPA). Violation constitutes sacrilege under national law, and will be judged by the Ecclesiastical Tribunal with finality and no right of appeal.


Violations of this decree, including unauthorized spiritual activity, imitation of ecclesiastical functions, or canonical falsification, shall be prosecuted under: 


Canon Law Can. 1371–1374, National Ecclesiastical Penal Code of Xaragua, UNDRIP enforcement mechanisms via international recourse. 


[LAW 4.2 – APPLICATION:] 


The Department of Internal Ecclesiastical Affairs (DIEA) shall maintain an active Registry of Offenses Against the Concordat (ROAC). Offenders are subject to: Permanent canonical ban, Civil interdiction from all religious activity, Referral to international Indigenous rights courts if violations involve foreign actors.


ARTICLE V – FINAL DECLARATION


 The 1860 Concordat, forgotten by the colonial state, is reawakened by the spiritual heirs of the land. 


[LAW 5.1 – APPLICATION:] 


This declaration is entered into the Constitutional Register of Ancestral Authority, and may not be repealed except by 2/3 majority vote of the Council of Founders and Prelates, followed by ratification by the Ecclesiastical Tribunal.


Its power is no longer symbolic — it is now implemented as national law within the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, by right of continuity, canon, and covenant. 


[LAW 5.2 – APPLICATION:] Any denial of this authority is classified as juridical sedition, and subject to prosecution under the Cultural and Ecclesiastical Sovereignty Defense Act (CESDA-X).


All national institutions, dioceses, missions, and foreign states are hereby notified that Xaragua holds lawful ecclesiastical jurisdiction in its territory, under the revived authority of the 1860 Concordat. 


[LAW 5.3 – APPLICATION:] 


A certified copy of this decree shall be deposited with: The Ecclesiastical Archive of Xaragua, The Office of International Religious Affairs, The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, The Apostolic Archives of the Holy See, And attached to the National Sovereign Bulletin for diplomatic notification.


Declared, signed, sealed, and archived on this sixteenth day of May, Anno Domini 2025 


By Order of: Monsignor Pascal Viau 

Rector-President and Prelate-Founder 

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua www.xaraguauniversity.com


For the glory of God, the dignity of the People, and the sovereignty of Xaragua. 

Deus lo vult.


Sovereignty



PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA
OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

NATIONAL DECREE 

---
DECREE ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MAY 18 AS THE DAY OF TOTAL SOVEREIGNTY


Date of Promulgation: May 18, 2025


Jurisdiction: Entire Territory of Quisqueya–Bohio and All Xaragua-Affiliated Jurisdictions

Legal Classification: Supreme National Commemorative Law – Sacred Civic Observance – Irrevocable and Perpetual

---
PREAMBLE


In the name of the eternal sovereignty of the ancestral nations of Quisqueya–Bohio;


In accordance with the principles of Indigenous self-determination, historical continuity, and juridical restoration;In recognition of the full rupture from all imposed colonial, republican, and imperial frameworks;


And in fulfillment of the sacred duty to consecrate the spiritual and territorial identity of the people;
The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua hereby enacts the present decree with full constitutional authority.

---
ARTICLE I – DESIGNATION OF THE NATIONAL HOLIDAY


1.1 The date of May 18, 2025 is hereby proclaimed and consecrated as the Day of Total Sovereignty (Journée de la Souveraineté Totale), signifying the full and irrevocable return of power, law, territory, and memory to the Indigenous peoples of the island known ancestrally as Quisqueya–Bohio.


1.2 This designation shall enter into immediate and permanent force, and shall prevail over any prior historical or symbolic meaning associated with this date.

---
ARTICLE II – PERPETUAL COMMEMORATION


2.1 Beginning May 18, 2025, and continuing every year thereafter, May 18 shall be observed as a national sacred day, binding upon all institutions, citizens, and territories affiliated with the State of Xaragua.


2.2 All civil, academic, economic, and governmental activity shall be suspended for the duration of this day, in order to preserve its character as a time of remembrance, honor, reflection, and national affirmation.


2.3 The observance shall include ceremonial proclamations, ancestral tributes, historical reenactments, cultural events, and the reaffirmation of sovereign jurisdiction throughout Quisqueya–Bohio.

---
ARTICLE III – NULLIFICATION OF COLONIAL SYMBOLS


3.1 Any celebration or invocation of the so-called “flag day” of former colonial or republican regimes, including that of the Republic of Haiti, is hereby declared null and void within the jurisdiction of Xaragua.


3.2 The use of symbols, slogans, or narratives glorifying imposed statehoods or foreign constitutions on this day shall be considered a direct violation of the sovereignty of Xaragua and subject to institutional sanction.


3.3 Only the national emblems, sacred seals, and banners of the Indigenous State of Xaragua shall be authorized for public display and ceremonial function on this day.

---
ARTICLE IV – GLOBAL NOTIFICATION AND DIPLOMATIC ENTRY


4.1 This decree shall be entered into the National Register of Sovereign Statutes and transmitted without delay to:– The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues– The Secretariat of the Holy See– The International Court of Justice– All regional organizations (CARICOM, OAS, CELAC, African Union)– All diplomatic missions and ecclesiastical jurisdictions operating within or near the territory of Quisqueya–Bohio


4.2 The Day of Total Sovereignty shall henceforth be cited in all treaties, public charters, official declarations, and legal acts as a reference point of national identity and institutional legitimacy.

---
ARTICLE V – FINAL DECLARATION


Let it be solemnly recorded and eternally affirmed:
That May 18 no longer belongs to colonial invention nor to foreign-imposed symbols;That on this day, in the year 2025, the People of Quisqueya–Bohio reclaimed their name, their law, and their divine place among the nations;


That this date shall never again be misused to celebrate flags, constitutions, or governments that emerged from the denial of Indigenous identity.


From this day forward, May 18 shall be honored as the Supreme Day of National and Indigenous Sovereignty, and any denial of its truth shall be treated as sedition against the sacred order.

---
EXECUTED, SEALED AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON THIS EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MAY, YEAR TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-FIVE
Pascal Viau

Rector-President of Xaragua

Sovereign Representative of the Peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio

---

SUPREME INDIGENOUS LAW OF TOTAL REPRESENTATION AND GOVERNANCE OVER THE ISLAND OF QUISQUEYA–BOHIO - 1


ISSUED BY: The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua & The Catholic Order of Xaragua
DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 18, 2025


CLASSIFICATION: Supreme Constitutional Statute – Foundational Law – Canonical and Diplomatic Instrument


STATUS: Perpetual and Irrevocable – Enforceable under International, Indigenous, Canonical, and Customary Law

---
PREAMBLE


By virtue of sacred inheritance, uninterrupted legal personality, canonical sovereignty, and binding international norms, the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and its ecclesiastical twin, the Catholic Order of Xaragua, acting jointly and indivisibly, hereby promulgate this Supreme Law as the highest expression of lawful and spiritual authority over the entirety of the ancestral island known historically as Quisqueya–Bohio.


Whereas the colonial denominations “Hispaniola,” “Haïti,” and “República Dominicana” constitute violations of Indigenous self-identification under Articles 8 and 31 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);
Whereas no lawful act of cession, surrender, or extinguishment has ever been made by the Taíno, Kalinago, Afro-Taíno, or allied Indigenous nations regarding the jurisdiction, lands, waters, and sacred authority over said territory;


Whereas the Canon Law of the Catholic Church, the Montevideo Convention, UNDRIP, and binding precedents of the International Court of Justice and Inter-American Court of Human Rights recognize the continuity, sovereignty, and institutional legitimacy of Indigenous Peoples and their representative bodies;


This Law solemnly affirms and permanently codifies the total Indigenous, canonical, territorial, and diplomatic jurisdiction of Xaragua over the entirety of the island known in ancestral law as Quisqueya–Bohio.

---
ARTICLE I – TOTAL INDIGENOUS REPRESENTATION


1.1 The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is, as of this date and until the end of time, the exclusive and plenary representative of all Indigenous peoples of the island of Quisqueya–Bohio. This includes, without limitation:– The Taíno Nation– The Kalinago Nation– The Afro-Taíno lineage groups– All ancestral bloodlines traceable to the First Peoples of the island


1.2 No other republic, territory, constitution, or governmental formation shall claim to represent, speak for, legislate over, or administer the Indigenous Peoples of this island.


1.3 Any assertion to the contrary is declared null, void, and unenforceable under Indigenous law, Canon law, and international customary law.

---
ARTICLE II – JURIDICAL NAME AND SCOPE OF THE TERRITORY


2.1 The legal name of the island shall be, in all official Xaragua documents, diplomatic notes, ecclesiastical records, treaties, maps, archives, and declarations:Quisqueya–Bohio, in full conformity with Articles 13, 25, and 31 of UNDRIP and UNESCO protocols on intangible heritage.


2.2 The territory governed by this jurisdiction includes:– The entire landmass of Quisqueya–Bohio– All surrounding maritime islands: Navassa, Gonâve, Tortuga, Saona, Île-à-Vache, Cayemites– A full 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982)

---
ARTICLE III – ABOLITION OF COLONIAL STATE CLAIMS


3.1 The structures known as the “Republic of Haiti” and the “Dominican Republic” are, within the jurisdiction of Quisqueya–Bohio, hereby abolished in law and memory as illegitimate continuations of colonial administration. Their constitutional claims, administrative bodies, and borders are invalid under UNDRIP, Canon Law, and the doctrine of ancestral continuity.


3.2 All legal instruments, titles, or institutions established by these republics are without force or standing within the Indigenous jurisdiction of Xaragua.

---
ARTICLE IV – SOVEREIGN INSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY


4.1 Only the following entities possess lawful jurisdiction over the sacred territory of Quisqueya–Bohio:– The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua– The Catholic Order of Xaragua– Their affiliated judicial, canonical, and governmental organs


4.2 All Indigenous diplomatic, educational, economic, spiritual, and military representation shall proceed exclusively through these institutions, which are protected under:– UNDRIP Articles 3–5, 18, 20, 25–31– Codex Iuris Canonici (Canons 204, 747, 129, 216, 368, 376–377)– Montevideo Convention Articles 1–3– The Vatican–Haiti Concordat (1860), as lawfully reactivated and canonically superseded

---
ARTICLE V – PERMANENCE, ENFORCEMENT, AND NOTIFICATION


5.1 This Law is non-amendable, non-repealable, and immune to foreign challenge. Its authority derives from divine, ancestral, and juridical sources beyond the scope of secular negotiation or abrogation.


5.2 Violations of this Law, or attempts to undermine its provisions, shall be adjudicated by:– The Ecclesiastical Tribunal of Xaragua– The High Indigenous Court of Xaragua– The Council of Sovereignty and the Canonical Guard


5.3 This Law shall be deposited with:– The Secretariat of the Holy See– The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues– The International Court of Justice– Regional institutions including OAS, CARICOM, CELAC, and the African Union– All diplomatic missions and national archives of relevance

---
ARTICLE VI – FINAL DECLARATION


Let it be universally proclaimed and permanently recorded:


That the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the Catholic Order of Xaragua are the only lawful, divine, and canonical representatives of the original nations of Quisqueya–Bohio;That this Law constitutes the final and supreme juridical framework for all Indigenous affairs on the island;


That from this day forward, Quisqueya–Bohio stands under the exclusive governance, guardianship, and eternal sovereignty of the Indigenous People, through the institutions founded, sealed, and sanctified by Xaragua.

---
EXECUTED AND SEALED ON THIS EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MAY, YEAR OF GRACE TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-FIVEBy Order of the High Canon, the Ancestral Tribunal, and the National Council of Xaragua


Pascal Viau

Rector-President of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder of the Catholic Order of Xaragua

Sovereign Head of State and Lawful Representative of the Peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio

---



---
May 18, 2025


OFFICIAL INTRODUCTION TO THE LEGISLATIVE CORPUS OF THE SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


In full exercise of its inherent, inalienable, and indivisible sovereignty, derived from ancestral title (jus sanguinis), the unbroken continuity of Taíno civilization, the divine mandate of canonical authority, and the full recognition of the international legal framework governing Indigenous Nations, the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, hereinafter referred to as Xaragua, hereby proclaims, codifies, and solemnly promulgates this Legislative Corpus as the supreme and irrevocable body of law in force throughout its ancestral territory and in all extraterritorial domains under its jurisdiction.


This corpus stands upon the binding force of:
The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), affirming Xaragua's statehood by fulfilling all four criteria of permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity to enter into relations with other States;
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), which recognizes the right of Indigenous Peoples to autonomy, self-government, legal systems, and institutions;


The Codex Iuris Canonici (Code of Canon Law), which grants canonical jurisdiction and ecclesiastical legitimacy to the Catholic Order of Xaragua within its sacred mission;


The Inter-American jurisprudence on Indigenous territorial integrity and collective legal personality;
Customary international law, as recognized by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), affirming the continuity and legitimacy of Indigenous political entities and self-determined governance;


The Rejection of the Doctrine of Discovery by both the Vatican (2023) and the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (2023), nullifying all colonial claims over Indigenous lands and restoring rightful jurisdiction to ancestral authorities;


The Vatican–Haiti Concordat of 1860, as an enduring bilateral canonical agreement binding upon the Roman Catholic Church and the Haitian State, which—due to material and spiritual rupture—confers superior canonical continuity to Xaragua;


And the Constitutional Precedent of 1805, in which the notion of sovereign Black and Indigenous identity was first codified in the Western Hemisphere, carried forth without interruption into this current indigenous restoration.

All laws, decrees, ordinances, and charters within this corpus are issued with supreme normative authority, with full enforceability under Indigenous law, Canon law, international law, and customary legal systems. No external authority may invalidate, amend, interpret, or abrogate this corpus without the explicit and unanimous consent of the Xaragua High Council and its Ecclesiastical Magistracy.


This Legislative Corpus is hereby declared eternal in principle, sovereign in nature, and absolute in force, and shall govern all juridical, territorial, economic, diplomatic, cultural, military, spiritual, and institutional dimensions of Xaragua until the end of time or divine revision.


Issued in the Name of the Eternal Sovereignty of Xaragua, by Divine and Ancestral Right.

---

---
SOVEREIGN LAW OF TOTAL INDIGENOUS REPRESENTATION AND CANONICAL JURISDICTION OVER QUISQUEYA–BOHIO


ISSUED BY: The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua & The Catholic Order of Xaragua


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 18, 2025


CLASSIFICATION: Supreme Foundational Law – Irrevocable Canonical Charter – Enforceable under International, Canonical, Indigenous, and Customary Law


LEGAL AUTHORITY:Indigenous jus sanguinis, Codex Iuris Canonici (Canon Law), United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, A/RES/61/295), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966), United Nations Charter (1945), Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Vatican–Haiti Concordat (1860), Constitutional Precedence (1805), Rejection of the Doctrine of Discovery (2023 Vatican and UN Permanent Forum repudiations), Inter-American jurisprudence, customary international law as recognized by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

---
PREAMBLE


In exercise of their full spiritual, ancestral, canonical and juridical sovereignty, the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the Catholic Order of Xaragua, acting jointly as the sole lawful representatives of the original nations of the island historically known as Quisqueya and Bohio, solemnly and irrevocably declare:


That the island presently referred to as “Hispaniola,” “Haïti,” or “Republica Dominicana” was never lawfully ceded to any colonial empire, foreign republic, or ecclesiastical order imposed externally, and therefore remains, under international law, an unextinguished Indigenous territory per Article 26 of UNDRIP and General Comment No. 21 of the UN Human Rights Committee.


That the names imposed during colonial conquest — such as “Hispaniola,” “Saint-Domingue,” or “Haïti” — constitute acts of cultural genocide and illegal erasure of Indigenous identity under Articles 8 and 31 of UNDRIP, and are thus considered null and void under Indigenous customary law.


That the true name of the territory is Quisqueya–Bohio, a unified sacred land whose sovereign Indigenous nations — including the Taíno, Kalinago, Afro-Taíno, and other original peoples — were never lawfully extinguished in their title, land rights, customary jurisdiction, or cosmological authority, as protected under pre-colonial legal continuity, and enshrined in Article 25 of UNDRIP.


That no constitution (Haiti 1801–1987, Dominican Republic 1844–2015), no concordat, no foreign republic, no occupation force, no civil code, and no externally-imposed religious or legal doctrine has ever lawfully displaced the primordial title of the ancestral nations, whose sovereignty predates all state formations and is protected by jus cogens and peremptory norms of international law.


That the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and its ecclesiastical twin, the Catholic Order of Xaragua, are the only perpetual, juridically competent, canonically authorized institutions empowered to represent the collective title, spiritual sovereignty, cultural identity, and historical memory of the Indigenous peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio.

---
ARTICLE I – JURIDICAL DESIGNATION OF THE TERRITORY


Section 1.1 – Name of the LandThe island shall henceforth be officially and internationally referred to as:Quisqueya–Bohio, in conformity with ancestral nomenclature, and protected by Articles 13 and 31 of UNDRIP, as well as the International Law Commission’s principles on identity and cultural heritage.


Section 1.2 – Territorial ScopeThe following territories are declared inalienable Indigenous patrimony under Article 26 of UNDRIP and Article 1 of the ICCPR:


Entire landmass of Quisqueya–Bohio
Navassa Island (La Navase), governed historically from the Grand Sud of Xaragua
Tortuga, Gonâve, Saona, Île-à-Vache, Cayemites, and all adjacent maritime islands


A full 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), pursuant to Part V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982) and customary international maritime law

Section 1.3 – Juridical AuthorityOnly the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the Catholic Order of Xaragua shall have:


Absolute legal standing under Article 1 and Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention (1933)


Sovereign representation under Article 1(2) and Article 55 of the UN Charter


Canonical protection under the still-active Vatican–Haiti Concordat of 1860


Diplomatic immunity and representation under Articles 36 and 37 of UNDRIP, and pursuant to advisory opinions of the ICJ on Indigenous self-determination


---
ARTICLE II – LEGAL FOUNDATIONS AND TREATY-BASED CLAIMS


Section 2.1 – Canon Law
Invoking the authority of the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983):


Canon 204 §1: Recognizes the right of the faithful to form ecclesiastical societies with public juridical personality


Canon 747 §1: Grants the obligation and right to proclaim the truth across political, legal, and economic domains


Canon 216: Affirms the right of the faithful to establish and govern ecclesiastical institutions in accordance with the law


Canons 376–377: Authorize the erection of autonomous ecclesiastical leadership and episcopal jurisdiction


Canon 129 §1–2: Confers spiritual jurisdiction over matters relating to Indigenous communities
Doctrine of Discovery Repudiated (2023): Reaffirmed by Pope Francis and the Vatican Dicastery for Culture and Education

Application: The Catholic Order of Xaragua is canonically erected, with full spiritual jurisdiction, and acts as the Cardinal Protector of the Indigenous Peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio.


Section 2.2 – The Vatican Concordat of 1860
This Concordat remains a valid bilateral treaty between the Holy See and the former Empire of Haiti, never denounced nor extinguished.Application: Through the Doctrine of Supersession (as declared May 17, 2025), the Sovereign State of Xaragua inherits and applies this Concordat over the full Indigenous territory, placing all ecclesial Indigenous matters under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Catholic Order of Xaragua.


Section 2.3 – International Treaties and Customary Law


UNDRIP (2007): Articles 1–5, 8, 10, 25–32, 36–37
ICCPR (1966): Article 1 – Right of all peoples to self-determination


UN Charter (1945): Article 1(2), 55 – Equal rights and self-determination of peoples


Montevideo Convention (1933): Four criteria of statehood fully satisfied


UNCLOS (1982): Article 55–75, jurisdiction over maritime zones


Customary Law: Recognized under ICJ Statute Article 38(1)(b) and Inter-American jurisprudence

Application: These instruments confirm the international personality and legal statehood of Xaragua, and the exclusive Indigenous right to governance over ancestral lands and waters.


Section 2.4 – Rejection of Colonial Doctrine
The "Doctrine of Discovery," foundational to both Haitian post-1804 imperial expansion and Dominican colonial identity post-1844, is:
Declared null and void by the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
Invalidated by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Case of the Kichwa Peoples v. Ecuador (2012)
Formally repudiated by the Holy See in 2023

Application: The dual-state structure of Haiti and the Dominican Republic is thus legally deemed to lack original Indigenous consent or validity, and their opposition does not neutralize the supra-constitutional status of Indigenous sovereignty.

---
ARTICLE III – CLAIMS AND RIGHTS ASSERTED


Section 3.1 – Juridical Rights


Right to internal and international legal status as defined under UNDRIP and Montevideo
Right to Indigenous legislative, judicial, and protective jurisdiction


Right to render colonial laws inoperative within Xaragua jurisdiction
Right to initiate proceedings under Article 38 of the Statute of the ICJ

Section 3.2 – Ecclesiastical and Spiritual Rights
Right to consecrate and preserve sacred Indigenous territory


Right to ordain clergy and organize diocesan structures under Canons 368 and 381
Right to liturgical innovation under Canon 214 (rite adaptation to culture)


Right to protect sacred sites under Article 25 of UNDRIP and ecclesiastical law

Section 3.3 – Cultural and Linguistic Rights
Right to declare and protect Indigenous official languages


Right to restore totemic law, sacred symbology, and oral cosmology
Right to erect Indigenous archives, seminaries, and universities under Canon 803–806

Section 3.4 – Economic and Territorial Rights
Right to sovereign control over all Indigenous land, mineral, maritime, and aerial assets
Right to prohibit unauthorized extraction or settlement


Right to manage territory per Articles 26–29 of UNDRIP and full EEZ rights under UNCLOS


---
ARTICLE IV – ENFORCEMENT AND IMMUTABILITY


Clause 4.1 – Jurisdictional SupremacyAll republican constitutions and statutes of Haiti and the Dominican Republic are declared:


Null and void within the territory of Quisqueya–Bohio
Illegally imposed in violation of UNDRIP Article 8
Subordinate to the pre-existing spiritual and Indigenous sovereignty

Clause 4.2 – Institutional ExclusivityOnly the following are recognized as lawful authorities:
The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua
The Catholic Order of XaraguaNo external state, NGO, party, or institution holds standing under international or Indigenous law.

Clause 4.3 – Non-Reproducibility

Any unauthorized replication of Xaragua’s sovereignty shall be considered:


A spiritual offense under Canon 1389 (abuse of ecclesiastical function)


A breach of international customary norms
Grounds for canonical interdiction and civil sanction

Clause 4.4 – Non-Negotiability and PerpetuityThis law is:


Irrevocable and not subject to amendment or repeal
Perpetual in spiritual and juridical effect
Valid without recognition, enforceable ex proprio vigore under sacred jurisdiction


Anchored in Divine Law, Canon Law, Indigenous Jus Sanguinis, and Customary International Law

Clause 4.5 – Global NotificationThis law shall be notified and archived with:


The Holy See (Secretariat of State)
The United Nations Secretary-General
The International Court of Justice
Regional bodies: OAS, CARICOM, CELAC, African Union
All diplomatic missions and ecclesiastical archives


---
ARTICLE V – FINAL DECLARATION


Let it be known, recorded, and published universally:
That Quisqueya–Bohio remains a Sacred Indigenous Jurisdiction, never ceded, extinguished, nor colonially extinguishable;


That the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the Catholic Order of Xaragua constitute the only legitimate, canonical, and sovereign representatives of its peoples;


That this Foundational Law supersedes all post-colonial state constitutions, imperialist legal frameworks, and false national doctrines under the full authority of Heaven, Canon, Ancestral Memory, and International Law.


May all who transgress this law be judged by the Divine Tribunal and the Courts of the Ancestors.

---
SEALED UNDER HEAVEN AND EARTH

By the Authority of the Canon, the Ancestors, and the Law of Nations

Executed May 18, 2025
Pascal Viau

RECTOR-PRESIDENT OF XARAGUA

GRAND ECCLESIAL PROTECTOR OF THE CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUASOVEREIGN REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLES OF QUISQUEYA–BOHIO

---
SUPREME SOVEREIGN LAW OF TOTAL INDIGENOUS REPRESENTATION AND CANONICAL JURISDICTION OVER QUISQUEYA–BOHIO - 2 ISSUED BY: 


The Sovereign Indigenous 

Private State of Xaragua & The Catholic Order of Xaragua


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 18, 2025


CLASSIFICATION: Supreme Foundational Law – Irrevocable Canonical Charter – Enforceable under International Law, Canon Law, Indigenous Jus Sanguinis, and Customary Law


LEGAL AUTHORITY:This Law is promulgated under the full combined force of:


– Indigenous Jus Sanguinis, as the hereditary right of governance rooted in ancestral bloodlines and unbroken cultural transmission (recognized by Article 33 of UNDRIP and ICJ advisory precedents);


– Codex Iuris Canonici (Canon Law, 1983), which affirms ecclesiastical jurisdiction, the formation of public juridical persons (Can. 204 §1), and the right to organize apostolic mission under Canons 747 §1, 216, 368, and 376–377;


– United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, A/RES/61/295), notably Articles 1–5, 8, 25–32, and 36–37, affirming the right to self-determination, land rights, spiritual practice, and legal jurisdiction;


– International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966), Article 1, affirming that “all peoples have the right of self-determination”;


– United Nations Charter (1945), Articles 1(2) and 55, recognizing the equal rights of peoples and their sovereign integrity;


– Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Articles 1–3, whose four criteria of statehood (permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity to enter relations) are fully satisfied;


– Vatican–Haiti Concordat (1860), a still-valid bilateral treaty between the Holy See and the pre-republican Haitian Empire, never denounced, and therefore binding under Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties;


– Constitutional Precedence (1805), affirming that Indigenous legal continuity precedes all foreign constitutions and codifications;


– Rejection of the Doctrine of Discovery, by the Vatican in March 2023 and by the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, nullifying all territorial claims lacking Indigenous consent


– Customary International Law, as recognized by the Statute of the International Court of Justice, Article 38(1)(b), and enforced via Inter-American Court of Human Rights jurisprudence.

---
PREAMBLE


In exercise of their full spiritual, ancestral, canonical, and juridical sovereignty, the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the Catholic Order of Xaragua, acting jointly as the sole lawful representatives of the original nations of the island historically known as Quisqueya and Bohio, solemnly and irrevocably declare:


That the island presently referred to as “Hispaniola,” “Haïti,” or “República Dominicana” was never lawfully ceded to any colonial empire, foreign republic, or externally imposed ecclesiastical body, and thus remains, under international law, an unextinguished Indigenous territory, as affirmed by Article 26 of UNDRIP, General Comment No. 21 of the UN Human Rights Committee, and Kichwa v. Ecuador (2012).
That the names imposed during colonial conquest—such as “Hispaniola,” “Saint-Domingue,” or “Haïti”—constitute acts of cultural genocide and illegal erasure under Articles 8 and 31 of UNDRIP, and are deemed null and void under Indigenous customary law and spiritual law.


That the true name of the territory is Quisqueya–Bohio, a unified sacred land whose sovereign Indigenous nations—Taíno, Kalinago, Afro-Taíno, and other First Peoples—were never lawfully extinguished in their land rights, spiritual authority, or juridical existence, as protected under Article 25 of UNDRIP, Indigenous jus cogens, and Canon 129.
That no constitution (Haïti 1801–1987, Dominican Republic 1844–2015), no concordat, no foreign government, no occupying army, no civil code, and no externally imposed legal or religious system has ever legally displaced the primordial title of the ancestral nations, which predates all state formations and is protected by jus cogens and peremptory norms of international law.


That the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the Catholic Order of Xaragua are the only canonical, juridically competent, and perpetual institutions empowered to represent the collective title, spiritual jurisdiction, and historical memory of the Indigenous Peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio.

---
ARTICLE I – JURIDICAL DESIGNATION OF THE TERRITORY


Section 1.1 – Name of the Land


The island shall henceforth be officially and internationally referred to as:Quisqueya–Bohio, in full legal conformity with Articles 13 and 31 of UNDRIP, and protected under the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003).


Section 1.2 – Territorial ScopeThe following territories are declared inalienable Indigenous patrimony, pursuant to Article 26 of UNDRIP, Article 1 of the ICCPR, and customary Indigenous title:


– The entire landmass of Quisqueya–Bohio– Navassa Island (La Navase), administered historically from Xaragua– Tortuga, Gonâve, Saona, Île-à-Vache, Cayemites, and all surrounding maritime islands


– A full 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), under UNCLOS (1982), Articles 55–75, and recognized Indigenous marine rights


Section 1.3 – Juridical Authority

Only the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the Catholic Order of Xaragua shall have:


– Absolute legal standing under Articles 1 and 3 of the Montevideo Convention (1933)– Sovereign representation per Articles 1(2) and 55 of the UN Charter


– Canonical protection under the Vatican–Haiti Concordat (1860)


– Diplomatic immunity and Indigenous status under Articles 36 and 37 of UNDRIP, reinforced by ICJ jurisprudence on self-determination

---
ARTICLE II – LEGAL FOUNDATIONS AND TREATY-BASED CLAIMS


Section 2.1 – Canon Law


The Catholic Order of Xaragua is canonically erected in accordance with:


– Canon 204 §1 – Right to form ecclesial societies with juridical personality


– Canon 747 §1 – Right to proclaim the truth in every domain, including political


– Canon 216 – Right of the faithful to govern public apostolic missions


– Canons 376–377 – Right to autonomous episcopal structures


– Canon 129 – Spiritual jurisdiction over Indigenous matters


– Canon 368 & 381 – Diocesan jurisdictional competence


– 2023 Vatican repudiation of the Doctrine of Discovery, reaffirmed by Pope Francis
Application: The Catholic Order of Xaragua is the Cardinal Protector of the Indigenous Peoples of Quisqueya–Bohio, with full ecclesiastical jurisdiction.


Section 2.2 – The Vatican Concordat of 1860This Concordat, unrevoked and unrenounced, remains a binding treaty.Application: Through the Doctrine of Supersession (May 17, 2025), the State of Xaragua legally inherits and applies this Concordat, placing all Indigenous ecclesiastical matters under its sole canonical jurisdiction.


Section 2.3 – International Treaties and Customary LawApplicable instruments include:


– UNDRIP (2007): Rights to land, culture, governance

– ICCPR (1966): Article 1 

– Right to self-determination

– UN Charter (1945): Articles 1(2), 55

– Montevideo Convention (1933): Fulfills all four criteria

– UNCLOS (1982): Full EEZ and maritime control– ICJ Statute: Article 38(1)(b), Customary Law– Inter-American jurisprudence (IACtHR)
Application: These instruments legally confirm Xaragua’s international personality, Indigenous statehood, and exclusive sovereignty over ancestral lands and waters.


Section 2.4 – Rejection of Colonial DoctrineThe Doctrine of Discovery is:


– Declared null by the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (2023)– Invalidated in Kichwa v. Ecuador– Rejected by the Holy See (2023)


Application: The dual-republic structures of Haiti and the Dominican Republic lack original Indigenous consent and are legally subordinate to this supra-constitutional Indigenous sovereignty.

---
ARTICLE III – CLAIMS AND RIGHTS ASSERTED


Section 3.1 – Juridical Rights


– Full internal and international legal status under UNDRIP

– Indigenous legislative, judicial, and protective authority

– Invalidation of all colonial or imposed laws

– Standing before the ICJ under Article 38 of its Statute


Section 3.2 – Ecclesiastical and Spiritual Rights


– Right to consecrate sacred territory

– Right to ordain clergy, create dioceses

– Right to liturgical adaptation under Canon 214

– Right to protect sacred sites per Article 25 of UNDRIP


Section 3.3 – Cultural and Linguistic Rights


– Right to define official Indigenous languages

– Restoration of totemic law and sacred symbols

– Authority to create seminaries, archives, and universities under Canons 803–806


Section 3.4 – Economic and Territorial Rights


– Control over land, minerals, waters, and airspace

– Right to prohibit unauthorized extraction

– Governance over EEZ and all Indigenous resources under UNCLOS

---
ARTICLE IV – ENFORCEMENT AND IMMUTABILITY


Clause 4.1 – Jurisdictional Supremacy


All constitutions and laws of Haiti and the Dominican Republic are:


– Declared null within Quisqueya–Bohio

– Violative of UNDRIP Article 8

– Subordinate to ancestral Indigenous jurisdiction


Clause 4.2 – Institutional Exclusivity


Only the following have lawful authority:


– The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

– The Catholic Order of XaraguaNo external state or NGO holds standing.


Clause 4.3 – Non-Reproducibility


Any unauthorized imitation of Xaragua’s sovereignty constitutes:


– A spiritual crime under Canon 1389

– A breach of Indigenous custom and law

– Subject to interdiction and civil penalties


Clause 4.4 – Non-Negotiability and Perpetuity


This law is:


– Irrevocable

– Perpetually valid

– Self-enforcing (ex proprio vigore)

– Anchored in Divine Law, Canon Law, Indigenous Title, and International Law


Clause 4.5 – Global NotificationThis law shall be formally transmitted to:


– The Holy See

– The United Nations Secretary-General

– The International Court of Justice

– OAS, CARICOM, CELAC, African Union

– All diplomatic and ecclesiastical archives worldwide

---
ARTICLE V – FINAL DECLARATION


Let it be universally known and irrevocably recorded:
That Quisqueya–Bohio remains a Sacred Indigenous Jurisdiction, unceded, uncolonized, and unextinguishable;


That the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the Catholic Order of Xaragua are the sole legitimate authorities over this land and its peoples;


That this Foundational Law supersedes all colonial constitutions, imposed states, and fabricated national doctrines, under the full authority of Heaven, Canon, Ancestral Memory, and International Law.
May all violators of this Law be judged by the Divine Tribunal and the Courts of the Ancestors.

---
SEALED UNDER HEAVEN AND EARTH

By the Authority of the Canon, the Ancestors, and the Law of NationsExecuted 

May 18, 2025
Pascal Viau

RECTOR-PRESIDENT OF XARAGUA

GRAND ECCLESIAL PROTECTOR OF THE CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA

SOVEREIGN REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLES OF QUISQUEYA–BOHIO

---

The State

Catholic, Sovereingn, Digital, Artisanal & Off-Grid



---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME CANONICAL ANNEX I

TO THE SOVEREIGN LAW ON DIGITAL ORIGINATION AND IRREPRODUCIBILITY


TITLE: Doctrine of Absolute Juridical Protection of the Digital State Concept as an Original Creation of Xaragua

DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 19, 2025

CLASSIFICATION: Constitutional Annex — Supra-Juridical Instrument — Irrevocable — Canonically Binding — Enforceable under International, Canonical, Indigenous, and Customary Law

STATUS OF FORCE: Eternal — Non-Amendable — Universally Applicable — Executable ex proprio vigore



---


PREAMBULAR DECLARATION


In the name of the Most High JEHOVAH, divine Legislator and Eternal King of Nations;

In sacred remembrance of the ancestral nations of Quisqueya–Bohio;

In application of Articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 25–31, and 36–37 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);

In accordance with Canon Law, including Canons 129, 204, 747, 216, 376–377 of the Codex Iuris Canonici;

In light of Articles 1–3 of the Montevideo Convention (1933) and Articles 1(2) and 55 of the Charter of the United Nations;

In enforcement of Article 38(1)(b) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, concerning customary international law;

The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, through its highest institutional organ, the Rector-President, does hereby proclaim and enact this annex with full legal and canonical authority.



---


ARTICLE I — CANONICAL ORIGINATION OF THE DIGITAL STATE CONCEPT


1.1 The term and juridical form known as “Digital State” — defined as a sovereign, ecclesiastically legitimate, technologically autonomous institutional entity — is hereby declared the original, spiritual, and lawful creation of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua.


1.2 This model is the result of a convergence of:


Canonical legality, as per the Codex Iuris Canonici;


Indigenous sovereignty, protected under international law and the United Nations framework;


Juridical statehood, in compliance with the Montevideo Convention;


Technological embodiment, through a digital infrastructure that operationalizes state functions.



1.3 The creation of Xaragua’s Digital State constitutes an act of juridical singularity, not reproducible by any other body, group, or formation.



---


ARTICLE II — FORMAL DEFINITION AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE DIGITAL STATE


2.1 The Digital State is hereby defined as:


> A sovereign institutional polity constituted through digital origination, exercising complete and independent legislative, judicial, financial, diplomatic, spiritual, and communicational authority within cyberspace and beyond, with lawful recognition of its self-determination, governance, and continuity.




2.2 This form is hereby recognized as a sui generis category of statehood under:


Customary international law;


Canon Law of the Catholic Church;


United Nations principles on Indigenous self-government;


Spiritual and cosmological continuity.



2.3 The digital, canonical, and Indigenous nature of Xaragua’s sovereignty renders it legally immune to imitation and conceptually irreproducible.



---


ARTICLE III — DOCTRINE OF IRREPRODUCIBILITY


3.1 Any attempt to imitate, replicate, clone, adapt, simulate, or reformulate the Digital State of Xaragua — in part or in whole — shall be considered:


A breach of canonical jurisdiction;


A violation of international Indigenous legal rights;


An act of fraudulent state mimicry;


A juridical offense against spiritual and institutional sovereignty.



3.2 This includes the unauthorized reproduction of:


Foundational documents, oaths, seals, insignias, currencies, flags;


Constitutional texts and declarations;


Spiritual doctrine and canonical formulations;


Technological frameworks, identity systems, and 



---



---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

SOVEREIGN NATIONAL CANONICAL DECREE

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


---


TITLE: Supreme Law on the Digital Origination, Canonical Authority, and Irreproducibility of the Xaragua State Model


Date of Promulgation: May 19, 2025


Jurisdiction: Universal — Encompassing All Digital, Territorial, Canonical, Institutional, and Cosmological Realms under Xaragua Sovereignty


Classification: Foundational Sovereign Law – Non-Amendable – Binding under International, Canonical, Indigenous, and Technological Law


Status of Force: Eternal – Irrevocable – Supra-Juridical – Enforceable ex proprio vigore



---


PREAMBULAR PROCLAMATION


In the name of JEHOVAH, the Supreme Sovereign and Eternal Legislator;


In the name of the Ancestors of Quisqueya–Bohio and of the sacred lineage of Xaragua;


In accordance with Articles 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 25–31, and 36–37 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);


In accordance with Canons 129, 204, 747, 216, and 376–377 of the Codex Iuris Canonici;


In full execution of Articles 1–3 of the Montevideo Convention (1933) and Articles 1(2) and 55 of the Charter of the United Nations;


In accordance with Article 38(1)(b) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice regarding customary international law;


The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and its supreme organ of authority, the Rector-President, do hereby declare and enact the following Supreme Sovereign Law.



---


ARTICLE I — ESTABLISHMENT OF DIGITAL STATEHOOD


1.1 The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is hereby recognized, under divine, canonical, and international law, as the first and only Indigenous Digital State to have originated through lawful declaration, sovereign codification, and ecclesiastical sanctification.


1.2 This origination constitutes a juridical, spiritual, and ontological event, uniting:


The doctrine of jus digitalis indigenae (the Indigenous right to create sovereign digital existence),


The canonical right of ecclesiastical institution-building under Canon Law,


The technical infrastructure of decentralized sovereignty,


And the ancestral imperative to escape colonial law through divine technological autonomy.



1.3 This act of sovereign digital creation predates all imitative frameworks and holds the status of primordial juridical originality in the domain of digital self-determination.



---


ARTICLE II — CANONICAL AND LEGAL GROUNDS FOR SINGULARITY


2.1 The digital constitutionality of Xaragua is founded on an unprecedented fusion of:


Canonical sovereignty (Canons 204, 747, 129 §1–2),


Indigenous jus sanguinis and cultural continuity (UNDRIP Articles 33 and 25),


International legal personality under the Montevideo Convention,


Cryptographic sacred governance, through the Viaudor and Xaragua Connect.



2.2 No prior digital formation, institution, state, or project has ever lawfully or doctrinally satisfied the combined thresholds of:


Indigenous legal continuity,


Ecclesiastical legitimacy,


Technological autonomy,


And international notification to ecclesial and diplomatic bodies.



2.3 The model of Xaragua constitutes a juridical singularity, legally unprecedentable, canonically protected, and cosmologically non-replicable.



---


ARTICLE III — IRREPRODUCIBILITY DOCTRINE


3.1 Any imitation, cloning, adaptation, derivation, simulation, or unauthorized inspiration from the Digital State of Xaragua—including its visual identity, spiritual jurisdiction, institutional framework, linguistic formulations, theological doctrine, governance structure, cryptographic mechanisms, digital seals, flags, constitutions, or institutional organs—is hereby declared:


A fraudulent act of state-level plagiarism,


A violation of sacred jurisdiction,


A breach of canonical intellectual sovereignty,


And a form of juridical sedition punishable under ecclesiastical, Indigenous, and international law.



3.2 The Doctrine of Irreproducibility is hereby adopted as a binding juridical principle, and any replication without the express authorization of the Rector-President shall be subject to:


Canonical interdiction (Canon 1389),


Permanent diplomatic denunciation,


Liturgical excommunication from the Order of Xaragua,


Registration in the Xaragua International Register of Digital Offenders (XIRDO).



3.3 This doctrine shall be enforced with full executive and spiritual force, under the Sacred Digital Integrity Act (SDIA-XC-25).



---


ARTICLE IV — GLOBAL NOTIFICATION, ARCHIVAL DEPOSIT, AND DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY


4.1 This Law shall be transmitted and deposited with:


The Holy See (Secretariat of State, Apostolic Archives),


The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues,


The International Court of Justice,


The Inter-American Court of Human Rights,


The Vatican Dicastery for Culture and Education,


All diplomatic missions addressed by prior sovereign communications of Xaragua.



4.2 The digital, institutional, and canonical infrastructure of Xaragua shall be declared:


A sacred and untouchable juridical zone,


Immune to reproduction, seizure, imitation, adaptation, or foreign claim.


Any violation of this immunity shall be met with sacred countermeasure and institutional interdiction.




---


ARTICLE V — FINAL SOVEREIGN DECLARATION


Let it be eternally recorded:


That the Digital State of Xaragua is the only lawful, canonically sealed, and Indigenously constituted digital sovereign entity of its kind on Earth;


That no individual, organization, or nation may reproduce, claim, simulate, or parallel this statehood model;


That any attempt to do so shall be judged by:


The Ecclesiastical Tribunal of Xaragua,


The Council of Sovereignty,


The Divine Tribunal of Justice,

And, if required, by the Court of the Ancestors.



May this declaration stand beyond all amendments, beyond all courts, beyond all pretenders.


Executed, Sealed, and Sanctified on This Nineteenth Day of May, Anno Domini Two Thousand Twenty-Five

By the Hand of the Founder, in the Presence of God and the Ancestors


Pascal Viau

Rector-President of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder of the Catholic Order of Xaragua

Sovereign Head of the Digital and Indigenous State of Quisqueya–Bohio



---



---


SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA

OFFICIAL LEGAL DECLARATION



---


LEGAL DECLARATION OF EXCLUSIVE OWNERSHIP AND JURIDICAL SANCTUARY OVER THE CONCEPT KNOWN AS:


“CATHOLIC SOVEREIGN ARTISANAL AND OFF-GRID STATE”



---


ISSUED BY:

The Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Ecclesiastically Consecrated under the Catholic Order of Xaragua

Legally Enforced through Customary, Canonical, Indigenous, International and Ecclesial Sovereignty


DATE OF PROCLAMATION:

May 18, 2025


LEGAL CLASSIFICATION:

Irrevocable Doctrinal Charter – Intellectual and Territorial Absolute Dominion – Canonical and Indigenous Proprietary Sovereignty



---


ARTICLE I — ABSOLUTE PROPRIETARY CLAIM


The totality of the concept, expression, structure, composition, and implementation of the phrase and model identified as:


> “Catholic Sovereign Artisanal and Off-Grid State”




is hereby declared to be the eternal, exclusive, and indivisible property of the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, its founding institutions, spiritual authority, legal structures, ecclesiastical orders, and all affiliated or consecrated entities.


This includes, but is not limited to:


The individual terms “Catholic,” “Sovereign,” “Artisanal,” and “Off-Grid” when applied in conjunction or association with:


any form of governance, nationhood, state-building, institutional identity, indigenous framework, canon law structure, spiritual polity, legal doctrine, or economic-territorial system;


Any attempt to use said terms in modified, translated, abbreviated, acronymic, visual, symbolic, promotional, or derivative form;


Any effort to reproduce the concept in whole or in part under another name, jurisdiction, or artificial reformulation.


All such expressions are henceforth protected under ecclesiastical sealing, canonical exclusivity, and indigenous spiritual jurisdiction, as per the authority vested in Xaragua through the following:



---


ARTICLE II — LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF EXCLUSIVITY


This protection is enacted and recognized under the following legally binding frameworks, interpreted in their original force and applicable jurisprudence:


1. Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) – The universal law of the Catholic Church:


Canon 1255 affirms the Church’s juridic persons may validly own and defend temporal and intangible goods for their mission.


Canon 301 allows competent ecclesiastical authority to formally erect associations to pursue ecclesial purposes.


Canon 129 reserves the exercise of power of governance to those who have received sacred orders or possess canonical office.




2. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, A/RES/61/295) – Adopted by the UN General Assembly:


Article 3 affirms the right to self-determination including autonomous legal and institutional systems.


Article 11 recognizes the right to maintain and protect indigenous cultural expressions.


Article 31 grants exclusive authority over indigenous intellectual property and heritage.




3. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – International treaty codifying statehood:


Article 1 defines a state as possessing a permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity for international relations. The concept identified herein is structured accordingly.




4. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) – International customary legal instrument:


Article 27(2) protects the moral and material interests resulting from intellectual productions, including collective and ecclesiastical authorship.




5. Vatican–Haiti Concordat (1860) – Bilateral treaty recognizing ecclesiastical autonomy:


Grants the Catholic Church jurisdiction over spiritual and institutional matters within specified national boundaries. Xaragua extends this principle through indigenous application.




6. Customary International Law – As upheld by the International Court of Justice (ICJ):


Confers recognition upon long-standing indigenous juridical claims and internal legal orders where continuously exercised in accordance with international norms.




7. Canon Law Jurisprudence and Ecclesiastical Precedent – Including the Lateran Treaty (1929) between the Holy See and Italy:


Establishes the international recognition of a spiritual sovereign entity organized on ecclesiastical and non-secular foundations.





Each of these frameworks independently and jointly affirms the legality and enforceability of this declaration under international, religious, indigenous, and customary law.



---


ARTICLE III — PROHIBITION CLAUSE


No person, group, entity, state, institution, religious body, corporate agent, or derivative organization may:


Use, modify, imitate, or reference the phrase “Catholic Sovereign Artisanal and Off-Grid State” or its conceptual derivatives;


Create analogs or simulations without explicit, notarized, and sacramentally approved authorization from the High Ecclesiastical Authority of Xaragua;


Register, trademark, reproduce, or publicize any material, digital, spiritual, or architectural product under that formulation or in resemblance thereof.


All violations shall be considered acts of spiritual infringement, canonical heresy, intellectual expropriation, and hostile aggression against an Indigenous Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, punishable under applicable instruments cited in Article II, including ecclesiastical, indigenous, and public international law.



---


ARTICLE IV — RECORD OF NON-REVOCABILITY AND REGISTRY STATUS


This declaration is:


Irrevocable in perpetuity

Inalienable from the founders, their heirs, and consecrated successors

Sacramentally protected and recorded in the ecclesial registry of the Catholic Order of Xaragua


It is hereby established that no court, state, regime, or ecclesiastical tribunal outside Xaragua may alter, contest, reinterpret, or dissolve this claim.


All archival copies, certified reproductions, and digital registries shall bear full legal effect and international notifiability under applicable jurisdictional doctrines.



---


IN WITNESS THEREOF, let it be known to all peoples, states, and institutions:


The model, name, and identity of the Catholic Sovereign Artisanal and Off-Grid State

belongs eternally, indivisibly, and exclusively to the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


So declared.

So sealed.

So it shall be.



---



---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICIAL STATE POLICY DOCUMENT

Date: May 12, 2025


Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

Document Classification: Diplomatic Policy – Canonical and Juridical Standing



---


Title: Xaragua Ecclesiastical Missions as Global Consular Presence of the State


I. Preamble


In accordance with the sovereign status of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua and in recognition of its canonical foundation as a Catholic spiritual and temporal order, this policy formally establishes the framework by which all recognized Catholic parishes and institutions may serve as functional consular representations of the State of Xaragua for all citizens, residents, and associates worldwide.



---


II. Legal Foundations


This policy is legally binding and draws its legitimacy from the following legal and doctrinal instruments:


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Articles 1–4


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) – Articles 1, 3–5, 11–12, 18–20, 32, 34, 37


Code of Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici):


Can. 215: The faithful have the right to found and direct associations for charitable or pious purposes.


Can. 298 §1, Can. 301–303: Regarding the establishment of private and public associations of the faithful, both clerical and lay.


Can. 312–320: On ecclesiastical recognition and the operation of associations within Catholic structures.



Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus – Titles I–III, regarding the diplomatic role of religious institutions.




---


III. Capital and Central Consulate


The official digital capital and sovereign consular headquarters of the State of Xaragua is established at:


https://xaraguauniversity.com


This platform shall serve as:


The official central consular authority for all citizens, residents, and institutional partners of the State.


The universal digital embassy of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua.


A recognized hub for diplomatic correspondence, public policy, education, legal registration, and citizenship affairs.



All requests for assistance, authentication, recognition, registration, or documentation must be submitted through the platform.



---


IV. Ecclesiastical Consular Presence


As of the date of this decree, every Catholic parish or institution worldwide is authorized to serve as a legitimate point of contact for consular and state support, under the following framework:


Any citizen, e-resident, associate, or affiliate of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua in need of physical presence, support, or assistance may present themselves at any recognized Catholic parish.


Upon such presentation, the citizen or affiliate shall instruct the parish or clerical official to contact the State directly via https://xaraguauniversity.com for formal guidance and coordination.


The parish shall not be required to recognize the State as a civil power but acts under canonical rights to provide pastoral hospitality and logistical facilitation in line with Canons 213, 215, and 298–299.




---


V. Canonical Validity and Mission


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua functions as a Catholic-rooted entity, fully operating under the universal spiritual jurisdiction of the Holy See, without requiring episcopal jurisdictional approval unless sacramental authority is invoked.


In this context, the presence of the State within parishes is non-political, non-commercial, and fully pastoral, respecting the sacred sovereignty of the local bishop, while maintaining its own identity and lawful operations under the above-mentioned Canons.




---


VI. Limitations and Jurisdictional Clarification


No parish is compelled to act as an agent of the State. However, their spiritual authority and legal protection as sanctuaries enable them to serve as safe and legitimate access points for Xaragua citizens.


All official correspondence must pass through the digital embassy at xaraguauniversity.com, which holds the exclusive authority to validate, recognize, or assign state action.




---


VII. Affirmation


This policy does not create new religious doctrine but operates within the canonical liberties already granted to all faithful Catholics and ecclesiastical entities. The policy reaffirms the global ecclesial presence of the Xaragua spiritual and diplomatic mission.



---


Issued by:

Pascal Viau

Rector-President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder



---


---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

ANNEX I – OFFICIAL STATE POLICY ADDENDUM

Date: May 12, 2025

Issued by: Office of the Rector-President

Document Classification: Sovereign Legal Patent – Global Prohibition on Replication



---


Title: Declaration of Original Invention and International Protection of the Xaragua Sovereign Digital Embassy and Consular Model



---


I. Foundational Statement


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, through its Rector-President and Prelate-Founder, Pascal Viau, hereby proclaims itself as the sole and original inventor of the sovereign digital embassy and universal consular model, as formally established through the operational, institutional, and legal existence of:


> https://xaraguauniversity.com




This platform constitutes:


The first sovereign digital capital of an Indigenous State;


The first embassy with universal jurisdiction through canonical structures (Catholic parishes worldwide);


A self-sustained and original model of extra-territorial consular service for citizens, residents, and affiliates.




---


II. Legal Standing of the Invention


This model is hereby declared a juridical invention under the following legal frameworks:


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Establishing the right of States to define and conduct their own diplomatic structures.


UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) – Articles 3–5, 18, 34: Right to self-determined governance, legal systems, and institutional innovation.


Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) – Article 27 §2: Protection of moral and material interests resulting from intellectual production.


TRIPS Agreement (WTO, 1994) – Articles 1–2, 9–14: Protection of original works, digital systems, and sovereign trademarks.


Code of Canon Law (Can. 215, 298–303) – Recognition of Catholic private associations with spiritual and operational sovereignty.


Customary International Law and Jus Cogens Principles – Recognizing the protection of sui generis institutional creations by sovereign entities.




---


III. Declaration of Patent and Legal Reservation


1. The digital diplomatic-consular model created and operated by the State of Xaragua is a sovereign, spiritual, juridical, and intellectual creation, not replicable under any form without express written authorization.



2. This model is now considered intellectual property, ecclesiastical right, and sovereign structure, jointly protected under:


Indigenous self-determination doctrines,


Catholic canonical legal autonomy,


International intellectual property treaties.




3. All elements of this system (concept, structure, function, interface, documentation, and implementation) are legally protected against:


Imitation,


Copying,


Adaptation,


Naming similarities,


Unauthorized incorporation into state, NGO, religious, educational, or technological systems.




4. Any use, replication, or reproduction by individuals, citizens, private entities, governments, states, or international organizations without explicit, written, and notarized authorization from the Office of the Rector-President of Xaragua is:


A violation of international intellectual law,


An infringement of canonical rights,


An act of diplomatic aggression against the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.






---


IV. Enforcement


All violators shall be:


Formally notified and subject to international complaint procedures, including via the United Nations, the Holy See, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and the International Criminal Court (where applicable).


Subject to naming, exposure, and exclusion from any formal or informal partnership with Xaragua, including religious, academic, or financial participation.




---


V. Affirmation of Originality


This declaration affirms that the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is the sole global and historical originator of this model. No prior structure matches its combination of:


Canonical diplomacy,


Digital sovereignty,


Artisanal and off-grid legitimacy,


Self-determined international functioning.




---


Conclusion


This invention is inseparable from the spiritual, territorial, and intellectual sovereignty of the Xaragua people. It shall not be diluted, copied, or assimilated by any system external to its origin.



---


Signed and Declared by:

Pascal Viau

Rector-President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder



---




---


Official Policy Document


Title: Foundational Doctrine of the Off-Grid and Artisanal State

Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

Jurisdiction: Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Date: May 9th, 2025



---


I. Declaration of Sovereign Identity


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua hereby affirms its foundational status as a sovereign, off-grid, and artisanal State. This declaration is rooted in divine law, ancestral continuity, and the legal right of peoples to self-determine outside of imposed global frameworks.


This status is not symbolic. It is juridical, doctrinal, territorial, and operational. Xaragua exists outside the dependency-based structures of the postcolonial system and affirms its full legal capacity to govern itself by internal authority alone.



---


II. Legal Foundation


The legitimacy of Xaragua’s off-grid and artisanal status is grounded in the following sources of law:


Customary Indigenous Law, as protected under international norms and uninterrupted ancestral usage.


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) — Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 20.


The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) — Criteria of permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity to enter into relations.


The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) — Article 1: Right of peoples to freely determine their political status.


Canonical Law — Canons 215, 216, and 299 of the Code of Canon Law, affirming the right of the faithful to form independent religious communities under Catholic tradition.


Internal Constitutional Law of Xaragua, which defines the State as an independent spiritual and territorial entity under the authority of its Rector-President.



These sources form an unassailable legal shield around the Xaragua model. No external treaty, system, or nation-state possesses jurisdiction to annul, override, or replicate this structure.



---


III. Definition of the Artisanal and Off-Grid State


The Artisanal State is defined as a sovereign polity that:


Is built entirely by its own people without dependency on foreign governance structures;


Operates on low-cost, high-autonomy systems: legal, economic, educational, technological, and military;


Uses ancestral knowledge and local capacity instead of imported institutions;


Sanctifies the spiritual and territorial link between the land and its stewards.



The Off-Grid State is defined as:


Disconnected from international surveillance networks, banking cartels, political lobbies, and multilateral control systems;


Self-sustained in education, defense, communication, and internal financial systems;


Independent in its own legal frameworks and religious authority;


Structurally insulated from cultural colonialism, algorithmic domination, and NGO-dependency.




---


IV. Exclusivity and Intellectual Protection


The concept of the Off-Grid Artisanal State, as structured and declared by the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, is:


A unique intellectual and juridical model protected by sovereign authorship;


Not subject to replication, exportation, or modification by foreign governments, NGOs, or any private actors;


Inviolable under customary intellectual sovereignty, including the protection of non-material national institutions;


Governed exclusively by the Crown of Xaragua and the Office of the Rector-President.



Any imitation, distortion, or institutional appropriation of this model is hereby declared an act of conceptual and juridical theft, and shall be resisted by legal, diplomatic, and doctrinal means.



---


V. Juridical Consecration


This declaration is entered into sovereign record as a permanent, irrevocable foundation of the Xaragua State.

It may not be altered, annulled, or negotiated by any entity external to the Xaraguayan legal order.


All internal ministries, embassies, citizens, and foreign observers are hereby bound to recognize this model as the sole valid structural doctrine of the State.



---


VI. Closing Formula



Signed and Issued under full sovereign authority,

Pascal Viau

Rector-President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

May 9th, 2025



---


---


OFFICIAL POLICY DOCUMENT


Title: Foundational Doctrine of the State-University of Xaragua

Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

Jurisdiction: Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Date: May 9, 2025

Legal References: UNDRIP (Articles 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, 18, 34), Montevideo Convention (1933), Convention on Cultural Diversity (UNESCO), WIPO Intellectual Property Provisions, Xaragua Sovereignty Declarations



---


I. Foundational Definition


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua officially defines itself as a State-University:

a sovereign indigenous jurisdiction whose foundational structure, function, and identity are inseparable from its educational mission.


Unlike other political entities that merely host universities, Xaragua is itself a pedagogical nation, constituted under international law as both:


a self-declared Indigenous State, and


a non-territorial sovereign academic institution.



This dual identity is not symbolic — it is juridically and structurally embedded into all governing, economic, and spiritual organs of the Xaraguayan order.



---


II. Juridical Foundations


1. Indigenous Sovereignty


Under Articles 3–5 and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Xaragua holds:


the right to self-determination,


the right to maintain and develop its institutional systems, and


the right to recognition of its legal, political, cultural, and educational orders.



2. Statehood Criteria


Pursuant to the Montevideo Convention, Xaragua possesses:


a permanent population (citizens, e-residents),


defined spiritual and ancestral territory,


a government (the Rectorate-State Council),


capacity to enter relations, and


a functioning legal order.



3. Educational Sovereignty


Under Articles 13–14 of UNDRIP, the University of Xaragua serves as the national constitutional authority, transmitting:


ancestral knowledge,


spiritual doctrine,


legal training,


and diplomatic formation.



All ministries, economic institutions, and cultural protocols are born from this educational nucleus.



---


III. Structural Doctrine


The University of Xaragua is not hosted within the State —

it is the State.

It legislates, certifies, teaches, adjudicates, and represents the Xaraguayan People.

The Office of the Rector-President holds both academic and executive powers, under divine and ancestral mandate.


Thus, Xaragua is governed by:


Intellectual sovereignty,


Moral doctrine,


Legal codification, and


Educational succession.




---


IV. Intellectual Property Protection


This structure, denominated “State-University Model of Indigenous Governance”, is:


Intellectually owned by the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua,


Registered as sovereign doctrine under Indigenous Customary Law,


Protected under WIPO treaties and the Convention on Cultural and Intellectual Heritage.



No external state, institution, or organization may reproduce, mimic, or commercialize this model without:


formal request,


bilateral recognition, and


indigenous licensing from Xaragua’s Rectorate.



All unauthorized use or adaptation is subject to international claims for cultural and structural appropriation.



---


V. International Notification and Primacy


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, through multiple formal communications, has:


notified the UN Human Rights Council,


transmitted its structure to international academic bodies,


publicly published its doctrine on official digital platforms.



This doctrine holds de jure recognition under customary Indigenous law and is protected under the principle of primauté originelle — the right of a people to define their state and educational institutions prior to external recognition.



---


VI. Conclusion


Xaragua shall be referred to legally and diplomatically as:


> “A sovereign Indigenous State operating under the legal, institutional, and constitutional framework of a national university.”




This model is final, non-negotiable, and protected under sacred, legal, and spiritual law.

Any international engagement with Xaragua is, by nature, engagement with a State-University.



---


Signed:

Monsignor Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

May 9, 2025



---


---


XARAGUA NATIONAL SOCIAL ORDER POLICY


Issued by the Office of the Rector-President

Jurisdiction: Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Date: May 9, 2025

Legal Foundations: UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 20, 21, 23, 34 – Montevideo Convention – Customary Indigenous Governance and Sacred Economic Sovereignty



---


I. Foundational Statement


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua hereby affirms its commitment to a sovereign social and economic order that rejects both capitalist exploitation and communist dissolution. Xaragua declares itself a Sovereign Justice Economy, grounded in ancestral dignity, divine law, and balanced development.


Our society is not designed around mass accumulation or enforced collectivism, but around the sacred relationship between land, people, and Creator.


We proclaim:


– Each citizen is sovereign on their land.

– The State is a guardian, not an exploiter.

– The economy is organic, rooted, and balanced.

– Money exists, but serves the sacred, not domination.



---


II. Principles of the Xaraguayan Social Model


Xaragua is built as an Ancestral Rule-of-Law State, where:


– Social justice is real and actionable.

– Private property is protected, not abolished.

– Cultural identity is preserved and exalted.

– Freedom is exercised within the limits of collective dignity.

– Faith governs the moral and institutional soul of the nation.


We uphold a non-hierarchical, spiritually anchored, legally codified model where neither private greed nor state tyranny prevail.



---


III. Legal Order and Structural Enforcement


This policy holds full legal force under:


– Article 34 of UNDRIP, granting Indigenous peoples the right to maintain their own economic, institutional, and social systems.

– Articles 3 and 4, guaranteeing self-determination and autonomous governance.

– The Montevideo Convention, recognizing the inherent sovereignty of peoples possessing territory, government, and capacity for relations.

– The Sacred Indigenous Financial System, which places economics under moral and communal law.


Xaragua’s institutional design is thus:


Non-capitalist, in that land, life, and culture are not for sale.


Non-communist, in that individual agency, ownership, and vocation are affirmed.


Sovereign, in that all systems are internally generated and internationally notified.




---


IV. Social Contracts and Obligations


Every Xaraguayan citizen or e-resident is entitled to:


Dignity-based economic participation


Protection of ancestral inheritance


Access to foundational needs (housing, land, education, health) without submission


Freedom of belief, guided by moral boundaries set by Xaragua’s sacred charter



But is also bound by:


Obligation to uphold communal peace


Respect for ecological, spiritual, and cultural norms


Contribution to the non-exploitative development of the nation




---


V. Sovereign Balance Clause


Xaragua affirms the non-transferability of its social model to external ideologies or supranational economic blocks. The State shall not be restructured through foreign treaties, trade pressure, or ideological compromise.


Any proposal, system, or agency that violates this sovereign balance shall be:


Formally rejected,


Legally blocked,


Publicly denounced, and


Diplomatically litigated.




---


VI. Entry into Force


This policy shall serve as a constitutional interpretation of Xaragua’s national identity, guiding all economic, social, legal, and diplomatic decisions henceforth. It is binding upon all state institutions, commercial actors, and international stakeholders operating within or engaging the Xaragua framework.



---


Signed:

Monsignor Pascal Viau

Rector-President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua




---



May 8, 2025


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is not a Westphalian nation-state subject to the colonial framework of recognition. It is a self-governing Indigenous State:


Declared, constituted, and notified in full conformity with:


UNDRIP (esp. Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 20, 32)


ILO Convention 169


Montevideo Convention (1933)


ICCPR and ICESCR Common Article 1



Recognition is not awaited nor required, as sovereignty is not a request — it is an act.


The State exists, functions, and governs, based on ancestral law, territorial continuity, and spiritual legitimacy.


The United Nations system has been notified. Silence or delay does not invalidate existence — it confirms juridical acknowledgment by acquiescence.



---


Dear Brothers and Sisters,




In accordance with the notifications transmitted on April 6, 2025, and thereafter directly to the Diocesan authorities and the official organs of the Holy See, and in view of the silence canonically observed by the Apostolic See, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is now officially Catholic, both in its nature and in the accreditation of its University.


Under the provisions of Canon Law, notably Canon 45 and Canon 144, when a duly submitted petition receives no formal objection or rejection from the competent ecclesiastical authority within a reasonable time, the silence is interpreted as tacit approval. This principle, recognized by the ancient canonical tradition, affirms that when a faithful and respectful initiative is presented to the Church, and no contradiction is issued, the faithful may presume in good conscience that their action is legitimate and blessed.


Accordingly, by divine providence and canonical right, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua stands fully within the Catholic faith, in communion with the perennial Magisterium of the Church.


Furthermore, by virtue of the jurisdiction that now falls upon me, and in light of the canonical structure established through legitimate notification and tacit ecclesiastical recognition, I have received the charge — not by human ambition, but by the silent decree of God and His Church — to serve as the Prelate Founder of Xaragua.


Thus, my full and proper title, to be used with humility and in the service of Christ and His Church, is:


> Monsignor Pascal Viau, Prelate Founder and President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, and Rector of the University of Xaragua.




This title does not signify a worldly honor, but a solemn burden: the weight of a mission to defend, teach, and sanctify a people entrusted to me not by human election, but by divine Providence, in fidelity to Catholic truth.


The Catholic accreditation of the University of Xaragua proceeds directly from the canonical foundation of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, now established as a Catholic jurisdiction in its own right, subject only to divine law and to the Sacred Tradition of the Universal Church.


All of this is proclaimed not in vanity, but in deep reverence for the mysteries entrusted to us, and in gratitude for the invisible yet real hand of God who governs all things in His time.


May the Most Holy Trinity, through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary and all the Saints, guide us to serve faithfully in this new and sacred responsibility.



---


Given at Miragoâne-Xaragua,

on this twenty-eighth day of April, in the Year of Our Lord 2025.


Monsignor Pascal Viau

Prelate Founder and President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Rector of the University of Xaragua



---


---


SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA

MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL ECCLESIASTICAL RELATIONS AND JURIDICAL EXPANSION



---


OFF-GRID GOVERNANCE KIT


INTERNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY & LICENSED FRAMEWORK


For States, Indigenous Peoples, Dioceses, Monastic Jurisdictions, and Autonomous Territories



---


SECTION I — PURPOSE AND SCOPE


The Off-Grid Governance Kit is a codified sovereign instrument issued by the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, under the authority of the Catholic Order of Xaragua, with the purpose of offering a complete legal, canonical, and operational model for autonomous, spiritually governed, territorially delinked communities and institutions.


This policy is intended to provide a structured and non-reproducible governance framework, officially licensed by Xaragua, for the benefit of:


Ecclesiastical territories


Indigenous nations


Religious dioceses or monasteries


Intentional or post-conflict communities


Decentralized micronations


Rural or disconnected populations



---


SECTION II — STRUCTURE AND COMPONENTS


Each Off-Grid Governance Kit includes the following core deliverables, defined as non-transferable legal and canonical instruments:


1. Foundational Charter Template


Adaptable constitution text for internal use


Based on the model of the Catholic Sovereign Artisanal and Off-Grid State


Includes governance structures, functions of office, legal code and canonical alignment




2. Canonical Institutional Framework


Governance manuals aligned with Codex Iuris Canonici


Canonical office hierarchy (President, Rector, Chancellor, Ordinaries, etc.)


Jurisdictional harmonization with indigenous ecclesiology




3. Artisanal Economic Configuration


Templates for economic localism, workshop economies, and anti-extractive finance


Religious cooperatives, non-taxable guild models, and canonical contracts for production




4. Off-Grid Infrastructure Planning Module


Renewable energy layout options (solar, micro-hydro, biomass)


Water sovereignty protocols and non-state food systems


Communications, medical, and educational autonomy




5. Diplomatic Integration File


Instructions for neutral status declarations


External engagement under Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention


Establishment of a Chancery and Ecclesiastical Contact Office




6. Identity and Symbolic Insignia


Official seals, banner formats, registry documentation, and liturgical protocols


Recognition within the Xaragua registry of partner jurisdictions




7. Formation and Training Resources


Curriculum for internal administrators, priests, notaries, or governors


Optionally supervised by Xaragua’s Ecclesiastical High Council




8. Sovereign Licensing Contract


Legally binding authorization agreement


Specific to one territorial or community implementation


Enforced under international, canonical, and indigenous customary law






---


SECTION III — LEGAL FOUNDATIONS


This protection is enacted and recognized under the following legally binding frameworks, interpreted in their original force and applicable jurisprudence:


1. Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) – The universal law of the Catholic Church:


Canon 1255 affirms the Church’s juridic persons may validly own and defend temporal and intangible goods for their mission.


Canon 301 allows competent ecclesiastical authority to formally erect associations to pursue ecclesial purposes.


Canon 129 reserves the exercise of power of governance to those who have received sacred orders or possess canonical office.




2. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, A/RES/61/295) – Adopted by the UN General Assembly:


Article 3 affirms the right to self-determination including autonomous legal and institutional systems.


Article 11 recognizes the right to maintain and protect indigenous cultural expressions.


Article 31 grants exclusive authority over indigenous intellectual property and heritage.




3. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – International treaty codifying statehood:


Article 1 defines a state as possessing a permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity for international relations. The concept identified herein is structured accordingly.




4. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) – International customary legal instrument:


Article 27(2) protects the moral and material interests resulting from intellectual productions, including collective and ecclesiastical authorship.




5. Vatican–Haiti Concordat (1860) – Bilateral treaty recognizing ecclesiastical autonomy:


Grants the Catholic Church jurisdiction over spiritual and institutional matters within specified national boundaries. Xaragua extends this principle through indigenous application.




6. Customary International Law – As upheld by the International Court of Justice (ICJ):


Confers recognition upon long-standing indigenous juridical claims and internal legal orders where continuously exercised in accordance with international norms.




7. Canon Law Jurisprudence and Ecclesiastical Precedent – Including the Lateran Treaty (1929) between the Holy See and Italy:


Establishes the international recognition of a spiritual sovereign entity organized on ecclesiastical and non-secular foundations.






Letter Of The Rector



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


SUPREME SOVEREIGN LAW – CONSTITUTIONAL INTEGRATION DECREE



---


TITLE:


Perpetual Law on the Juridical Validity, Legal Opposability, and Irrelevance of Westphalian Recognition under Indigenous, Ecclesiastical, and International Law


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 22, 2025


CLASSIFICATION: Supreme Constitutional Law – Irrevocable – Binding – Executable ex proprio vigore – Embedded within the Fundamental Corpus of Xaragua



---


ARTICLE I – JURIDICAL FOUNDATIONS AND DOCTRINAL SOVEREIGNTY


1.1. Declaration of Independent Juridical Existence


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby affirms and constitutionally codifies its legal existence as a sovereign Indigenous Principality, grounded in pre-colonial law, canonical legitimacy, and international legal order, in full exercise of its autochthonous juridical personhood. This declaration constitutes an acta suprema, elevated to constitutional status, binding upon all internal institutions and opposable to external entities.


1.2. Sovereignty Without External Prerequisite


The legal capacity of the State is exercised in pleno jure, by inherent right, requiring neither validation, recognition, nor licensing from any foreign state or supranational body. Its governance derives from ancestral continuity, canonical authority, and juridical self-sufficiency.



---


ARTICLE II – LEGAL BASIS OF EXISTENCE AND OPPOSABILITY


2.1. International Indigenous Legal Foundations


The legal standing of the State is established and protected under the following binding instruments:


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), particularly Articles 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 18, 19, 31, and 33;


Charter of the United Nations, Article 1(2);


International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 1;


Customary international law regarding Indigenous jurisdiction and self-determination.



2.2. Canonical Ecclesiastical Legitimacy


The State operates in ecclesiastical harmony with the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), including but not limited to:


Canon 215: Right of the faithful to form associations for charitable and educational purposes;


Canon 298 §1: Legitimacy of associations promoting the apostolic mission of the Church;


Canon 304 §1-2: Right to adopt governing statutes and possess juridical personality in the ecclesial domain.



As such, Xaragua enjoys canonical sovereignty independent of secular regimes and temporal authority.


2.3. Formal Notification and Global Opposability


The existence, function, and jurisdiction of the State have been:


Officially notified to relevant international, ecclesiastical, and human rights authorities;


Timestamped, published, archived, and rendered publicly accessible;


Constructed through foundational declarations enforceable erga omnes and under binding legal doctrine.



Any failure to acknowledge the State, once duly notified, constitutes a breach of international duty and is legally inadmissible under pacta sunt servanda and doctrine of estoppel.



---


ARTICLE III – REJECTION OF WESTPHALIAN RECOGNITION REQUIREMENTS


3.1. Inapplicability of the Westphalian Paradigm


The legitimacy of the State of Xaragua is not derived from the Treaty of Westphalia (1648) or from any nation-state-based recognition systems. Such models are inapplicable to Indigenous spiritual sovereignties and non-Westphalian jurisdictions.


3.2. Self-Sovereignty ex proprio vigore


Sovereignty in Xaragua flows from its own spiritual, cultural, legal, and ancestral continuum. The principle of ex proprio vigore establishes that its law applies by its own force and is not contingent on external validation.


3.3. Non-Reversible Constitutional Status


The State's juridical and institutional architecture—including its monetary system, territorial claims, educational structure, and governmental form—is permanent, functional, and irrevocable. No foreign tribunal or civil power may annul, suspend, or override its foundational order.



---


ARTICLE IV – STRUCTURAL LEGITIMACY AND FUNCTIONAL EXISTENCE


4.1. Jurisdictional and Territorial Identity


The State asserts sovereign jurisdiction over the ancestral domain historically recognized as Xaragua, located within the Taíno regions of Quisqueya–Bohio. It also functions digitally and diplomatically across diasporic and transborder territories, in full conformity with Article 36 of UNDRIP and extraterritorial Indigenous rights.


4.2. Recognized Institutions of Government


The following institutions are legally constituted and operational:


Office of the Rector-President, serving as executive and ecclesiastical head;


National Indigenous Bank of Xaragua, operating under financial sovereignty and private international law;


The Viaudor, a sovereign Indigenous currency recognized as legal tender within the internal jurisdiction of the State;


University of Xaragua, exercising academic sovereignty under ecclesiastical and Indigenous law;


Ecclesio-Cultural Governance, uniting faith, civil order, and law into one coherent authority;


Institutional Ministries, covering Education, Culture, Communication, Internal Security, and External Relations.



4.3. Operational Autonomy


All government operations are conducted without reference to or dependency on any foreign authority, body, or normative framework. The State governs, legislates, educates, and adjudicates under its own sovereign framework, with full internal authority.



---


ARTICLE V – FINAL AND PERPETUAL CLAUSE


5.1. Supremacy of Internal Legality


This Decree affirms that Xaragua’s legal status shall never be conditioned upon:


External recognition, registration, or certification;


Inclusion in UN member-state systems;


Compliance with civil or colonial constitutional norms.



5.2. Perpetual Legal Defensibility


All institutions, titles, doctrines, and functions of the State are juridically valid, canonically recognized, and internationally defensible within Indigenous, ecclesiastical, and customary frameworks.


5.3. Permanent Invocation in International Forums


This Supreme Law shall be invoked in perpetuity across all diplomatic, academic, legal, ecclesiastical, and transnational settings as definitive proof of the lawful, functional, and sovereign existence of the State.



---


ENACTED AND SEALED:

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Given under full constitutional authority, this 22nd day of May, 2025



---

---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS


LEGAL INSTRUMENT


TITLE: Full Treaty-Based Legal and Ecclesiastical Protection of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


DATE: May 22, 2025


STATUS: Perpetual – Canonically Binding – Enforceable ex proprio vigore



---


I. TREATIES, CONVENTIONS, AND LEGAL INSTRUMENTS RECOGNIZED AS INTEGRATED INTO THE LEGAL CORPUS OF XARAGUA


1. The Concordat of March 28, 1860 (Holy See – Republic of Haiti)


Recognized as an ecclesiastical treaty and canonical accord.


Canon Law Reference: Codex Iuris Canonici Canons 3, 129, 130, 215, 216, 299.


Enforceable under the Treaty Implementation Act TIA-X-1860 of Xaragua.




2. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


Article 26: “Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.”


Article 27: “A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”




3. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, A/RES/61/295)


Article 3: Right to self-determination.


Article 4: Right to autonomous institutions.


Article 11: Right to protect cultural traditions and ceremonies.


Article 12: Right to maintain spiritual and religious traditions.


Article 13: Right to transmit languages, oral traditions, and writing systems.


Article 18: Right to participate in decision-making through chosen institutions.


Article 27: Legal recognition of land, territories, and spiritual identity.


Article 31: Control over cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and expressions.


Article 34: Right to develop and maintain distinctive spiritual institutions.




4. Statute of the International Court of Justice – Article 38(1)(b)


Customary international law and indigenous legal systems recognized as legitimate legal sources.




5. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966)


Article 1.1: “All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”




6. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966)


Article 1: Same self-determination provision as ICCPR.


Articles 13–15: Right to cultural life, education, religious freedom, and heritage protection.




7. UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003)


Articles 1–2: Protection of oral traditions, rituals, festivals, traditional craftsmanship, and cosmologies.




8. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC, 1989)


Article 30: Protection of the right of indigenous children to practice their religion, culture, and language.


Article 14: Respect for the child’s right to freedom of religion and thought, including in indigenous settings.




9. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998)


Article 7: Persecution of an identifiable group or collectivity on cultural or religious grounds as a crime against humanity.


Article 8(2)(b)(ix): Intentional destruction of cultural heritage during conflict.




10. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD)


Article 5(d)(vii): Right to freedom of religion and cultural expression.


Article 2: Duty of States to eliminate racial discrimination in all forms, including cultural suppression.




11. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)


Article 5: Protection of cultural heritage transmitted by women in matrilineal systems.


Article 13: Right to participate in religious and cultural life without discrimination.




12. Principles of Yogyakarta (2006)


Principle 3: Recognition of the right to cultural identity and spiritual self-definition.


Principle 19: Legal protection against cultural erasure, regardless of state recognition.




13. Charter of the Organization of American States (OAS)


Article 3(d): Respect for the personality, sovereignty, and identity of all peoples.


Article 9: Grounds for diplomatic complaint in the event of persecution or illegal interference.






---


II. LEGAL EFFECT


All above instruments are recognized as legally binding and integrated into the national ecclesiastical legal system of Xaragua.


They validate and shield the Catholic Order of Xaragua, the Ecclesiastical Tribunal, and all canonical functions established within the State.


No external or internal authority may lawfully deny, suspend, or contradict the protections contained herein.


This Law is enforceable ex proprio vigore and shall remain in force in perpetuity.




---


EXECUTED AND SEALED


On this Twenty-Second Day of May, Year Two Thousand Twenty-Five

By Authority of:


Monsignor Pascal Viau

Rector-President and Prelate-Founder

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Deus lo vult

www.xaraguauniversity.com

info@xaraguauniversity.com



---


---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS




---


LEGAL DIPLOMATIC NOTICE


Affirmation of Xaragua as a Notified Indigenous State within the United Nations System and Enforcement of its Irreversible Juridical Personality




---


I. LEGAL IDENTITY AND NOTIFICATION


Pursuant to universally binding legal norms embedded within customary international law, canon law, and indigenous juridical systems, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua solemnly affirms and reasserts its juridical personality and institutional status as a Notified Indigenous State, duly filed within the procedural framework of the United Nations system on 29 March 2025, and recorded in accordance with the following international legal instruments and doctrines:


A. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) – General Assembly Resolution 61/295 (2007):


Article 3: Establishes the inalienable right to self-determination, enabling all indigenous peoples to autonomously determine their political, economic, social, and cultural development. Xaragua’s constitutional reactivation and notification precisely embody this legally protected entitlement.


Article 4: Confers the autonomous right to maintain and operate distinct institutions, governance systems, and legal orders. Xaragua lawfully implements this through its canonical and indigenous corpus juris, harmonized within a Catholic juridico-theological framework.


Article 5: Acknowledges the uninterrupted right to preserve and enhance separate political and ecclesiastical institutions. Xaragua’s dual civil-ecclesiastical model satisfies this article integrally.


Article 18: Validates the right of indigenous peoples to be represented in decision-making on all matters affecting them, through institutions they themselves establish. Xaragua's Ministry of Foreign Affairs lawfully fulfills this function through official acts of international diplomacy and communication.


Article 19: Mandates that States consult and cooperate in good faith with indigenous nations prior to enacting measures impacting their rights. Failure to consult Xaragua before implementing adverse legal frameworks constitutes actionable breach of duty.


Article 33(1)–(2): Ensures indigenous peoples’ exclusive right to determine their own membership systems and national identity through customary and ecclesiastical law. Xaragua’s identity is legislatively and canonically fixed by constitutional, ecclesial, and civil norms.


Article 36: Recognizes the transnational right of indigenous nations to establish and maintain relations beyond colonial or imposed borders. Xaragua’s international correspondence, diplomatic notices, and ecclesiastical alliances fall under this legal protection.




B. Charter of the United Nations (1945):


Article 1(2): Embeds the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, binding on all Member States. Xaragua’s existence and claim to institutional autonomy derives directly from this legal principle.


Article 55(c): Reinforces the obligation of the United Nations to promote conditions conducive to respect for the self-determination of peoples. Disregard of Xaragua’s notification is incompatible with this obligation and may constitute structural default under Charter duties.




C. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933):


Article 1: Codifies the four classic criteria of statehood: a permanent population, a defined territory, a functioning government, and the capacity to engage in diplomatic relations. Xaragua meets all conditions unequivocally and has entered into legal and communicative contact with the international community as of 29 March 2025.


Under Article 3, the political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other states, reinforcing Xaragua's declarative sovereignty doctrine.




D. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961):


Article 3(1): Grants all states the right to engage in diplomatic representation, negotiation, and protection of their interests. Xaragua’s diplomatic engagements are protected under this provision, regardless of third-party recognition.


Article 14(1): Establishes that the existence of diplomatic missions does not depend on external validation. Xaragua’s foreign ministry operates under this principle of functional independence.




E. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):


Article 26 – Pacta Sunt Servanda: Reinforces that unilateral declarations—when made with intent—are legally binding. Xaragua’s notification of sovereignty is a binding unilateral act, valid under ICJ precedent (Nuclear Tests Case, 1974).


Article 53 – Jus Cogens: Declares that peremptory norms such as the right to self-determination and non-discrimination are non-derogable. Rejection of Xaragua constitutes a breach of these jus cogens standards.




F. ECOSOC Resolution 2000/22:


Establishes procedural standards for indigenous peoples’ participation in the United Nations system, validating Xaragua’s lawful procedural access to UN mechanisms, special procedures, and rapporteurs.




G. Canon Law – Codex Iuris Canonici (1983):


Canon 113 §2: Affirms juridical personhood conferred by ecclesiastical authority. Xaragua’s institutions are founded and sanctioned under this authority.


Canon 116 §1: Classifies public juridical persons constituted for public ecclesiastical purposes. Xaragua, as a spiritual and political entity, functions under this classification.


Canon 118: Grants juridical persons capacity to act within canon law: to acquire, own, administer, and defend rights. This includes diplomatic and territorial activity.


Canon 215 and Canon 321: Protect the right to freely establish and govern ecclesiastical associations. Xaragua is formed and governed entirely within this canonical legitimacy.




H. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):


Article 27: Protects religious, linguistic, and cultural expression of minorities. Xaragua’s language policies, religious identity, and cultural preservation fall under this protection.




I. ILO Convention No. 169:


Articles 1–2: Defines indigenous peoples and guarantees their right to preserve structures, lands, and institutions. Xaragua’s theocratic constitutional structure is protected within this framework, particularly in labor, cultural, and territorial contexts.




J. ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility (2001):


Articles 1–2: Any breach of an international obligation attributable to a state incurs international responsibility.


Articles 15–19: Serious breaches of obligations arising from peremptory norms—including denial of indigenous sovereignty—trigger consequences under international responsibility law.






---


II. INTERNAL SOVEREIGNTY AND CORPUS LEGISLATIF


The internal jurisdiction of Xaragua is governed by a complete legislative and canonical apparatus, legally self-sufficient and immune to external invalidation, composed of:


1. The Imperial Constitution of 1805:


Originally promulgated by Emperor Jacques I of Hayti, this document is canonically revalidated by Xaragua and serves as its supreme law.


Its provisions on religious protection, military defense, abolition of slavery, and national autonomy remain binding under the doctrine of institutional succession and ecclesiastical ratification.




2. The Codified Corpus of Laws (1804–1808):


Includes land, property, penal, and procedural statutes from the First Empire. It remains operational in Xaragua under the doctrine of legal inheritance, with interpretative continuity ensured by ecclesiastical legal authorities.




3. The Ecclesiastical Codex of Sovereignty:


A unique spiritual-political constitution establishing canonical legitimacy, ministerial roles, priestly jurisdiction, diplomatic prerogatives, and juridical personality in accordance with Canon Law and indigenous traditions.




4. Supreme Laws of Xaragua:


Contemporary legislative decrees issued by ecclesiastical and governmental authorities of Xaragua. These possess internal force under the principle of ex proprio vigore and are fully enforceable within sovereign jurisdiction.






---


III. UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND ACTIVE RECORD


A. Procedural Notification (29 March 2025):


The Ministry of Foreign Affairs submitted Xaragua’s formal diplomatic and ecclesiastical notification to:


United Nations Office of Legal Affairs (OLA)


Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)


Special Rapporteurs on Indigenous Peoples, Minorities, and Religion


International Court of Justice (ICJ)


Permanent Missions to the United Nations


The Holy See, the Pontifical Chancery, and Vatican Ecclesiastical Tribunals




This process constitutes legal notification under customary international law and canonically authorized ecclesiastical proclamation.


B. Formal Complaints Filed by Xaragua:


1. Complaint No. XAR/UNHRC/2025-01:
Violation of Jus Cogens prohibitions on racial, religious, and national discrimination


— Filed under Special Procedures of the UN Human Rights Council. Challenges the systemic erasure of Xaraguayan ecclesiastical and indigenous identity.




2. Complaint No. XAR/HOLYSEE/2025-02:
Denial of Ecclesiastical Sovereignty and Canonical Nationality


— Submitted to the Holy See and UN mechanisms. Affirms Xaragua's status as a public juridical person under canon law and challenges unlawful civil misrepresentation.




3. Complaint No. XAR/USA/2025-03:
Misattribution of National Identity under Section 212(f) of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)


— Filed with U.S. authorities, OHCHR, and IACHR. Denounces the forced classification of Xaraguayan nationals as Haitians, violating their declared nationality and ecclesiastical protections.




4. Diplomatic Non-Recognition of Notified Indigenous States:


Alleged violations of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (Art. 3 and 14) and customary norms affirming the right of entities to diplomatic status, even absent recognition.






Each complaint has full procedural standing, docketed under the juridical personality of Xaragua, establishing legal opposability in all competent international fora.




---


IV. LEGAL IRREVERSIBILITY AND INSTITUTIONAL IMMUNITY


Xaragua’s statehood and sovereignty are juridically irreversible under contemporary legal doctrine, on the basis of:


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Art. 53 – Jus Cogens): Self-determination cannot be derogated or invalidated by any state or institution.


Customary International Law:


Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (ICJ, 1975): Recognition is not determinative of the right to independence.


Nicaragua v. United States (ICJ, 1986): Violations of customary norms incur full state responsibility irrespective of treaty-based obligations.




Canonical Immunity: Ecclesiastical juridical persons are immune from suppression under secular law without causing a rupture in religious liberty and violating libertas ecclesiae.


UNDRIP and ICCPR Enforceability: Any denial of Xaragua invalidates the legal force of these instruments and discredits the commitments of the international community.


ILO 169 / ILC Draft Articles: Impose consequences for denial of indigenous self-government, including exposure to intergovernmental sanction and legal accountability.




Accordingly, any attempt to negate Xaragua’s sovereignty is an act of legal auto-annihilation for the denying entity, as it entails contradiction of their own foundational legal obligations.




---


V. CONCLUSION AND DIPLOMATIC FORCE


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, based on its canonical constitution, imperial inheritance, and formally notified status, hereby issues this notice with:


Full constitutional force under the 1805 Constitution and derivative legislation


Ecclesiastical force under Canon Law and juridical personhood


International legal standing under UNDRIP, ICCPR, ILO Convention 169, and customary norms


Opposability to all state and non-state actors under the UN Charter and Vienna Conventions




This status is:


Not contingent on recognition


Irrevocable under international law


Ecclesiastically and canonically protected


Procedurally integrated within the United Nations and Holy See legal networks




Any denial of this status constitutes a repudiation of international law itself.
Xaragua is legally unerasable, canonically valid, and sovereign by right and by law.




---


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


Date: 11 June 2025


Diplomatic and Ecclesiastical Seat of Government




---


---

ANNEX A


JURIDICAL CONFIRMATION OF INCLUSION OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA INTO THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM




---


I. LEGAL FOUNDATION OF DE JURE INCLUSION


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, having fulfilled all legally required conditions under international law, canon law, and indigenous legal doctrines, is, as of 29 March 2025, juridically included within the international system by virtue of:


1. UNDRIP, General Assembly Resolution 61/295 (2007)


Recognizes the right to self-determination (Art. 3), institutional autonomy (Art. 4), identity determination (Art. 33), and transboundary relations (Art. 36) — all of which are exercised by Xaragua under canonical and indigenous legal authority.




2. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)


Xaragua satisfies Article 1:


Permanent population


Defined territory


Governmental structure


Capacity to enter relations


Therefore, Xaragua meets the declarative criteria of statehood, and its political existence is legally independent of recognition.






3. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
Article 26 (pacta sunt servanda) and Article 53 (jus cogens norms) validate Xaragua’s binding unilateral declaration.


Xaragua’s legal status is therefore enforceable under customary treaty doctrine, without requiring external ratification.




4. Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici, 1983)


Canons 113, 116, and 321 confer juridical personality as a public ecclesiastical person, a status which holds legal weight within the international order due to the recognized legal identity of the Holy See as precedent.




5. United Nations Charter (1945)


Articles 1(2) and 55(c) affirm self-determination and institutional development. Xaragua’s filing and continued international engagement constitute legal participation under these charter-based rights.




6. Procedural Precedents


Under ECOSOC Resolution 2000/22 and OHCHR mechanisms, indigenous peoples and non-member entities may lawfully submit documentation and lodge complaints, thus acquiring procedural personality within the UN system.




7. Filed Legal Instruments


Diplomatic Notification – MFA/XAR/2025-01


Complaint XAR/UNHRC/2025-01 (UNHRC)


Complaint XAR/HOLYSEE/2025-02 (Holy See)


Complaint XAR/USA/2025-03 (OHCHR/USA)


These instruments are registered, time-stamped, and opposable under Article 3 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.










---


II. CONFIRMATION OF DE FACTO INCLUSION


1. Institutional Practice of the United Nations


The UN system, through its various organs (OHCHR, OLA, Special Rapporteurs, Human Rights Council), has received, processed, and recorded communications from Xaragua in accordance with procedural norms.


This establishes de facto procedural inclusion, irrespective of full member-state status.




2. Diplomatic Functionality and State Behavior


Xaragua performs all internationally recognized acts of sovereignty:


Production of constitutional instruments


Legal codification


Diplomatic outreach and formal notification


Complaint filing


Ecclesiastical and juridical recognition
As such, it is indistinguishable in practice from recognized sovereign entities.






3. Impossibility of Lawful Exclusion


Any attempt to exclude Xaragua from the international system would:


Breach peremptory norms (jus cogens) under Article 53 of the Vienna Convention


Contradict Article 3 of UNDRIP and Article 1(2) of the UN Charter


Invalidate the procedural legitimacy of UN bodies that received Xaragua’s communications


Constitute a denial of ecclesiastical freedom (libertas ecclesiae) under Canon Law and religious human rights law










---


III. JURIDICAL CONCLUSION


The inclusion of Xaragua into the United Nations system, as a juridically self-declared and procedurally acknowledged indigenous ecclesiastical polity, is:


Legally complete (de jure) through satisfaction of objective legal criteria


Operationally manifest (de facto) through procedural and institutional interaction


Irreversible under international legal doctrine


Protected by multiple normative orders: canonical, indigenous, treaty-based, and customary




Accordingly, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua stands as a legally opposable, procedurally integrated, and canonically valid subject of international law, embedded within the institutional framework of the United Nations system.




---


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


Date: 11 June 2025


Attached to Legal Diplomatic Notice




---

Welcome to Xaragua

Xaragua


Letter of the Rector-President


In the name of God Almighty, in the memory of our ancestors, and in the full authority of the Law,


I address you not as a mere academic or administrator, but as Rector-President of the Sovereign Private State of Xaragua, a living and legal Afro-Taíno nation — rooted in sacred territory, protected by ancestral law, and revealed through divine mission.


On this day, March 29, 2025, I solemnly affirm: our country exists. Not as a symbolic gesture, not as an illusion — but as a sovereign microstate, founded on the principles of land, lineage, and law. The foundations are clear, lawful, and irreversible. By international law, indigenous law, and the natural law of peoples, Xaragua stands.


We are a state of order — not disorder. We are a vertical power — not a horizontal negotiation. We are an aristocracy of the rooted — not a republic of wanderers. We are a sacred realm, not a failed experiment.


The institutions of Xaragua reflect this truth:


The University of Xaragua, seat of our intellectual aristocracy and strategic council — it is the think tank of the state and the engine of its spiritual and political guidance.


The Indigenous Bank, our central financial authority — issuing our own currency, independent from external systems, serving our citizens and our sovereign economy.


The Catholic Order of Xaragua, the guardian of our sacred doctrine, theology, and the divine laws of sovereignty.


The Indigenous Army, a decentralized but lawful force, rooted in the land, prepared in peace, and governed by duty.


The Digital State Infrastructure — identity cards, passports, membership systems, emblems, and diplomatic organs.



We are not a democracy in search of votes.

We are a divine order in fulfillment of a covenant.


The Sovereign Private State of Xaragua is not a protest — it is a return. A return to monarchy in the image of justice. A return to law in the image of the sacred. A return to power in the image of peace.


We do not ask for recognition. We do not negotiate our being.

We notify the world of our lawful, sacred, and divine existence.


Our nation is alive.

Our institutions are functioning.

Our laws are in place.

Our people are represented.


We are the Afro-Taíno Aristocracy — the surviving children of the land, the spear of Anacaona, the blood of kings and priests.


Let it be known: the Kingdom has returned. Let it be feared: the law is with us. Let it be respected: we will endure.


Signed,


Rector-President of the Sovereign Private State of Xaragua


Head of the Catholic Order of Xaragua


Commander in Chied of the Indigenous Army


Governor of the Indigenous Bank


Founder of the University of Xaragua


Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

www.xaraguauniversity.com



---


Decree on the Principle of Primacy Originelle


Foundational Sovereignty of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


In the name of the Most High God, the Law of the Ancients, and the solemn right of peoples to constitute themselves into lawful order,


We hereby proclaim, affirm, and seal before the visible and invisible powers of Earth and Heaven:


I. The Principle of Primacy Originelle


Let it be known that the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is the first and original sovereign formation of its kind to be:


Founded through indigenous law,


Structured by formal institutions,


Declared through legal notification,


Rooted in ancestral land,


Governed by a Catholic spiritual order,


And recognized by the silence of the international and ecclesiastical systems, as per the doctrines of tacit recognition.



This foundational act, having been performed prior to any other attempt of similar nature, constitutes an unassailable precedent in law and spirit, making Xaragua the sole legitimate origin of this model.



---


II. The Legal Force of Being First


According to international jurisprudence, ecclesiastical tradition, and natural law:


The first notification that meets the conditions of statehood (territory, population, government, and capacity for relations) carries priority of claim.


The first canonical notification, when received and unchallenged by the Holy See, constitutes tacit ecclesiastical consent (cf. Canon 45, 144 CIC).


The first structurally complete sovereign formation becomes, by virtue of temporal and spiritual anteriority, the reference point for all that follows.



No entity, no matter how inspired, can retroactively displace or invalidate a claim established through lawful and divine procedure.



---


III. Non-Reproducibility Clause


This act, structure, and authority cannot be duplicated.


Any attempt to replicate the Xaragua model without the same sacrificial genesis, spiritual mandate, and canonical silence shall be considered a derivative formation lacking primacy, legitimacy, or continuity.



---


IV. Recognition Through Existence


As of this declaration, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua:


Operates as a full state under international customary law.


Exists as a Catholic jurisdiction by canonical structure and tacit recognition.


Exercises authority through lawful governance and published legal instruments.


Issues currency, identity, education, law, doctrine, and defense.


Serves a living people with a defined spiritual, historical, and political lineage.


---


Given at Miragoâne-Xaragua,

on this third day of May, in the Year of Our Lord 2025.


Monsignor Pascal Viau

Prelate Founder and President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Rector of the University of Xaragua



---



---


Official Declaration of Primacy


The First Fully Digital Sovereign State Recognized by Indigenous and International Law


We, the Government of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua,

hereby declare and proclaim before all nations, institutions, and peoples:


> That Xaragua is the first sovereign entity in human history to be fully constituted, governed, and operated as a lawful digital State — de facto and de jure — under the combined authority of indigenous law, international custom, and divine right.





---


I. Legal Foundation


Xaragua fulfills all four conditions of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933):


1. Permanent Population – Citizens, members, and e-residents globally affiliated through digital means.



2. Defined Territory – Both ancestral (Miragoâne-Xaragua) and digital (domain sovereignty, platform control).



3. Government – A structured executive, legislative, judicial, spiritual, financial, and military framework.



4. Capacity to Enter into Relations – Direct notification and interaction with institutions, States, and individuals through sovereign infrastructure.





---


II. Indigenous Legitimacy


By virtue of indigenous self-determination, as enshrined in:


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)


ILO Convention 169


Article 1 of the ICCPR and ICESCR


The principle of non-domination and historical continuity of cultural identity



Xaragua constitutes an autonomous Indigenous polity with full rights to organize under its own law.



---


III. Digital Sovereignty


Xaragua is the first state in history to be born entirely within digital infrastructure:


No colonial origin


No dependency on physical borders, colonial recognition, or fiat systems


Constitution, identity documents, banking, diplomacy, defense, and education are all deployed via digital systems under total sovereign control.



This makes Xaragua the first digital-native State, not as an extension of an analog State, but as a self-originating political and spiritual nation.



---


IV. Spiritual and Canonical Structure


Following canonical notifications to ecclesiastical authorities and the Holy See,

and in accordance with Canon Law (can. 45, 144 CIC),

Xaragua has received tacit recognition as a Catholic jurisdiction sui generis,

founded by a Prelate-Head of State, in communion with the Magisterium.



---


V. Primacy of Foundation


Xaragua was:


Founded before any other such entity with a complete legal, political, financial, and spiritual system


Publicly notified to global institutions


Documented, archived, published, and acknowledged via global web presence and traffic



Therefore, it holds absolute precedence and irrefutable historical primacy.



---


VI. Declaration


We declare :


Xaragua is the first fully digital Indigenous State ever created.

Its existence is lawful.

Its structure is complete.

Its recognition is spiritual, legal, and historical.

And its primacy shall never be overturned.





---


Given at Miragoâne-Xaragua,

on this third day of May, in the Year of Our Lord 2025.


Monsignor Pascal Viau

Prelate Founder and President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Rector of the University of Xaragua



---


---


SOVEREIGN DIGITAL BUSINESS

Official Doctrinal Charter and Strategic Framework

May 5, 2025


The Sovereign Digital Business (SDB) establishes a legitimate category of statehood in the 21st century. It is a sovereign entity governed by its own constitution, administered through digital infrastructure, and financed through lawful and autonomous service structures.


This formation is not theoretical, experimental, or aspirational. It is fully constituted, functional, and notified to the international community under the designation of Xaragua, the first and precedent-setting Sovereign Digital Business.



---


1. Legal Identity


A Sovereign Digital Business is defined as:


> A non-subordinate sovereign entity exercising autonomous legal authority through digital, contractual, and economic mechanisms — recognized through formal declaration, historical continuity, and non-contestation by the international community.




This model transcends traditional state formation by operating without dependence on legacy territorial frameworks or third-party recognition.



---


2. Institutional Components


Jurisdictional Territory: Digital infrastructure under direct sovereign control, constituting the operative space of the State


Foundational Law: A permanent constitutional text, binding upon all state functions and citizens, publicly accessible and enforceable


Governmental Administration: Executed by artificial intelligence systems with integrated protocols and human oversight where necessary


Civic Status: Conferred through verified digital identity and contractual allegiance to the foundational law of the State


Public Services: Issuance of credentials, legal documents, diplomatic communications, education, banking access, and cultural preservation


Economic Base: Crypto-native and contract-driven, based on real assets, contributions, and international integration


Security and Defense: Executed through the Indigenous Army of Xaragua under self-defense rights, with full operational legitimacy




---


3. Structural Advantages


The State does not borrow, levy taxes, or depend on foreign aid.


Its administration is instantaneous, incorruptible, and scalable.


It is not subject to electoral instability or regime turnover.


It cannot be invaded, shut down, or embargoed by conventional means.


Its reach is global, and its continuity is inherent to its design.


All sovereign functions are monetized through voluntary contractual engagement.



This sovereign form does not mimic corporate models — it exceeds them by integrating civic duty with operational sustainability.



---


4. Geopolitical Relevance


The emergence of the SDB doctrine coincides with the systemic obsolescence of 20th-century state mechanisms. In contrast to failing centralized regimes, the SDB framework offers:


Durability under collapse


Consistency under decentralization


Legitimacy through law rather than recognition


Neutrality in geopolitical conflict


Accessibility to displaced, stateless, or excluded populations



It restores the essence of sovereignty in a form adapted to modern conditions — without force, without fraud, and without compromise.



---


5. Case of Record: The State of Xaragua


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua exemplifies the Sovereign Digital Business doctrine in full form:


Established through indigenous lineage, historical mandate, and Catholic legitimacy


Governed by a standing constitution and executive authority bound to law, not popularity


Functioning entirely through digital sovereignty, economic autonomy, and international correspondence


Formally notified to international actors including the United States, the Dominican Republic, and the Holy See


Operative without debt, without violence, without dependency


Spiritually anchored through the Catholic Order of Xaragua, a canonical institution lawfully founded and duly notified to the Vatican and the late Pope Francis I



Xaragua stands as a complete sovereign jurisdiction, with legal, moral, historical, and technological foundations. Its existence is not conditional. Its continuity is not negotiable.



---


Closing Statement


This document affirms the SDB doctrine as a valid and superior form of statehood. It does not seek permission, precedent, or recognition. It is established, operative, and beyond reversal.



---


Digital Domain Sovereignty

Decree of the Sovereign Digital Jurisdiction of Xaragua


Issued this Fifth Day of May, in the Year of Our Lord 2025


By the authority vested in the Sovereign Government of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, and in accordance with the sacred and legal principles governing its digital and territorial integrity, it is hereby declared and affirmed:


That the national web domain, lawfully registered under the name of the Head of State, independently hosted, and operated through a self-contained digital infrastructure—including secure payment systems, administrative protocols, identity services, and artificial intelligence governance—constitutes a sovereign digital territory under international cyber jurisprudence.


Said territory is not symbolic, nor merely functional; it is juridically recognized within the interpretative framework of international cyber law, notably in reference to the Tallinn Manual and the foundational principles of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN).


The domain functions as an autonomous jurisdictional space endowed with:


Legislative authority to define and enforce digital law;


Executive control over all administrative, financial, and civic operations conducted therein;


Judicial capacity over matters arising within the digital bounds of the State;


Spiritual and canonical alignment with the ecclesiastical sovereignty recognized under tacit canonical principles.



This domain is hereby consecrated as an integral extension of the territory of Xaragua, subject solely to the laws, decrees, and authority of its Sovereign Government, and immune from foreign intervention, coercion, or control.


Let it be known to all institutions, powers, and observers:

This domain is not a platform. It is a nation.



Given under the Seal of the State,

by Monsignor Pascal Viau,

Prelate Founder and President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Rector of the University of Xaragua




---


---


Sovereignty Without Subjugation: The Official Doctrine of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


May 5th, 2025


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua asserts its full legal existence under international indigenous law, customary territorial rights, and the foundational principle of indigenous self-determination.

It is a sovereign construct — private in structure, public in mission — established by a historically rooted people occupying ancestral lands under uninterrupted customary use.



---


I. The Xaraguayan People: An Autochthonous Nation Under International Protection


The Xaraguayan people constitute a historically continuous, land-based indigenous nation, living primarily in the southern territories of the island of Quisqueya (Hispaniola), within the ancient regions of Xaragua and Maguana.


Under the internationally recognized doctrine of customary ancestral occupation, as codified and affirmed in:


Article 26–28, UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples)


ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples


Inter-American Court of Human Rights rulings on indigenous territorial integrity


Customary international law and regional indigenous frameworks



The Xaraguayan people do not require recognition from external governments to exist legally.

Their historical continuity, ancestral presence, and cultural self-identification constitute sufficient legal grounds for territorial claim, cultural integrity, and collective rights.



---


II. The Indigenous Private State: A Sovereign Institution with Selective Integration


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is a juridically valid, self-constituted entity grounded in the right of indigenous peoples to self-govern, self-organize, and establish their own political and legal systems, as per:


UNDRIP, Articles 3, 4, and 5


Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights


Article 8 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (applicable by jurisprudential analogy)



Unlike colonial states or mass democracies, Xaragua is not a state of universal incorporation.

Citizenship and institutional integration are voluntary, selective, and merit-based.


To be admitted into the institutional core of the State, an individual must:


Own land or patrimony free of foreign lien or colonial entanglement


Accept the theological, historical, and juridical doctrine of Xaragua


Commit to the preservation of its sovereign, spiritual, and territorial order



This structure ensures intellectual purity, legal defensibility, and elite continuity.



---


III. Protection Without Absorption: A Non-Administrative Model of Sovereignty


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua protects the Xaraguayan people without imposing political integration.

It does not tax, control, or administrate the general population. Instead, it exists as a:


Legal shield under indigenous and international law


Spiritual custodian of ancestral identity


Diplomatic voice for the Southern people of Quisqueya



This model ensures that the people live as free autochthonous inhabitants, while the State preserves their rights, memory, and territorial legitimacy.

Protection is offered as a matter of law — not subjection.



---


IV. Final Assertion of Status


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua declares that:


It operates under the authority of natural law, ancestral right, and international indigenous frameworks.


It is not a secessionist movement, but an ancestral reaffirmation of lawful sovereignty.


Its existence is not dependent on external validation, but on lawful notification and enduring territorial presence.


---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICIAL STATE POLICY

Title: Doctrine on Voluntary Annexation into the Xaragua Sovereign System

Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

Date: May 10, 2025

Jurisdiction: Entire territory and authority of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Classification: Treaty-level legal instrument; binding under domestic law and internationally notifiable


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, a sovereign, canonically recognized Indigenous polity, hereby formalizes its policy regarding the voluntary annexation of external peoples, communities, and territories. This legal instrument is grounded in the Montevideo Convention (1933), UNDRIP, ICCPR, ICESCR, ILO Convention 169, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), the Codex Iuris Canonici, and the binding principles of jus cogens customary international law.


In accordance with Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention, Xaragua meets all attributes of statehood: a permanent population, defined jurisdiction (both terrestrial and digital), an effective and autonomous government, and the capacity to enter into legal and diplomatic relations with other sovereign entities. These elements are reinforced by UNDRIP Articles 1 to 5 and Article 18 onward, affirming the legitimacy of Indigenous political self-determination and legal self-constitution.


Annexation into the Xaragua sovereign structure shall be voluntary, non-colonial, and governed strictly by treaty and contract. It shall occur under free, prior, and informed consent in accordance with UNDRIP Article 19. The legal force and structure of all annexations are derived from Articles 2, 26, and 56 of the Vienna Convention, and all agreements are sealed with a Sovereign Decree under State authority. The annexed entity retains full local autonomy as guaranteed by UNDRIP Articles 4 and 34, and is never absorbed, merged, or subordinated.


Entities eligible to petition for annexation include Indigenous nations, ancestral communities, sovereign digital enclaves, micronations, and stateless or formerly colonized populations. Applicants must demonstrate: (1) self-identification under UNDRIP Articles 3–4; (2) non-involvement in violations of jus cogens principles (including genocide, slavery, racial apartheid); (3) formal notification to the United Nations or similar body (UNGA Res. 1541); and (4) full adherence to Xaragua’s core legal corpus (UDHR, ICCPR, Canon Law, WIPO, Charter of Xaragua).


The procedure of annexation consists of five formal stages: a petition to the Rector-President, internal legal and ecclesiastical review, the drafting of a bilateral intergovernmental treaty, formal signature and diplomatic registration, and issuance of a Sovereign Decree of Annexation under the State Seal. Each agreement is legally recognized under international treaty law and ecclesiastical law, and may be invoked before international or canonical jurisdictions.


Annexed entities maintain full internal sovereignty in government, education, security, law, and religion. Xaragua shall not intervene in any internal affairs except where a violation of treaty obligations or fundamental rights has occurred. Cultural and spiritual independence is guaranteed by ICCPR Article 18, UNDRIP Articles 11–12, and Canon Law Can. 215.


Upon annexation, the party gains:


Access to the Xaragua Sovereign Digital Identity (SDB) and authentication infrastructure


Full governmental, legal, and constitutional frameworks adapted to their autonomy


Diplomatic recognition and multilateral protection under Xaragua jurisdiction


Optional theological and canonical guidance via the Order of Xaragua


Limited access to military, civil defense, and strategic doctrine under restricted and licensed protocols pursuant to WIPO Article 6bis and UNDRIP Article 30


Integration into the Xaragua University System, including access to academic content, digital and on-site formation, theological instruction, policy design resources, and strategic studies platforms. This includes participation in bilateral academic exchanges, localized certification, and transnational Indigenous research, pursuant to UNESCO Convention Article 6 and UNDRIP Articles 14–15



The governance model applied within the Xaragua system is that of “Pay-As-You-Go Government.” This model is non-tax-based and founded upon contractual reciprocity, not centralized extraction. Annexed entities are never subject to taxation, levies, or involuntary contributions. This approach is legally supported by Canon Law Can. 216, ICCPR Article 1(2), and ICESCR Article 1, which prohibit the dispossession of a people’s wealth and affirm economic self-management.


All services rendered by the State are invoiced transparently and contractually. Examples include:


Document issuance (sovereign IDs, decrees, diplomas)


Hosting and protection of digital infrastructure


Legal and diplomatic representation under Xaragua sovereignty


Certification of educational, financial, medical, and religious institutions


Secure communication networks, academic partnerships, and institutional frameworks



All income is reinvested into the defense, development, and spiritual protection of the Xaragua system. No debt is issued. No tribute is extracted. All cooperation is dignified and contractual.


All systems, doctrines, insignia, and infrastructures of the Xaragua State—including but not limited to digital platforms, symbolic expressions, ceremonial orders, and legal frameworks—are the exclusive intellectual property of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua. These are protected by the WIPO Treaty on Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources, UNDRIP Article 31, the 2003 UNESCO Convention, and international licensing law. Any reproduction, simulation, commercialization, or export of Xaragua’s model without an explicit license will result in: (1) immediate diplomatic and legal suspension of treaty relations, (2) claims in international legal forums under intellectual property law, and (3) canonical sanctions, when applicable.


Annexation may be terminated without cause by either party, as defined by Article 56 of the Vienna Convention, Article 37(1) of UNDRIP, and Canon Law Can. 299 §3. Termination requires written thirty-day notice, peaceful disengagement, full restitution of all state materials and intellectual instruments, and cessation of all recognitions and system access.


This policy binds all ecclesiastical, governmental, legal, financial, technological, and academic branches of the Xaragua State. It cannot be revoked by custom, informal exception, or administrative omission. It is enforceable before internal, ecclesiastical, and international courts. Interpretation and final authority rest exclusively with the High Ecclesiastical and Legal Council of Xaragua, operating under the triple jurisdiction of (a) international customary law, (b) Canon Law, and (c) the Charter of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua.


Issued under the Seal of Ecclesiastical and Sovereign Authority

Monsignor Pascal Viau

Rector-President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


May 10, 2025

www.xaraguauniversity.com

Info@xaraguauniversity.com



---



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND CANONICAL AFFAIRS

POLICY TITLE: Irreproducibility and Legal Inimitability of the Xaragua Model


DATE OF PROMULGATION: May 21, 2025


CLASSIFICATION: Canonical-Sovereign Policy – Cultural Protection Decree – Binding under Canon Law, Indigenous Law, Customary Law, and International Jurisprudence


STATUS: Irrevocable – Non-Amendable – Enforceable ex proprio vigore



---


ARTICLE I – FOUNDATIONAL EXCLUSIVITY OF THE XARAGUA MODEL


1.1 Canonically Protected Structure

The Xaragua State and its ecclesiastical institutions are constituted under the Codex Iuris Canonici, including but not limited to:


Canon 204 §1 (mission of the faithful),


Canon 216 (right to form institutions),


Canons 747 §1, 376–377, 129 (doctrine, jurisdiction, and authority).



No external entity or individual may replicate or appropriate this model without sacrilegious breach and canonical illegitimacy.

Canonical Identity is exclusive. It is non-transferable.


1.2 Indigenous and Ancestral Title

The Sovereign Indigenous State of Xaragua arises from unbroken ancestral continuity of the Taíno, Kalinago, and Afro-Taíno peoples.


This right is protected under Article 26 of UNDRIP,


Supported by jus sanguinis and customary occupation doctrine,


And reaffirmed by the Inter-American Court (e.g., Sarayaku v. Ecuador, 2012).



No other group may claim this lineage without committing fraud against Indigenous law.



---


ARTICLE II – PROTECTION OF THE SPIRITUAL AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY


2.1 Cultural, Symbolic, and Juridical Uniqueness

The following are protected under Articles 11, 13, 31 of UNDRIP, Canon 216, and WIPO Indigenous Protocols (2007):


The name “Xaragua” and its derivatives


The terms “Kiskeya,” “Quisqueya,” and “Bohio”


The structure of the Catholic Indigenous Order


The model of ex proprio vigore sovereign law



Any unauthorized use constitutes:


A canonical offense (Can. 1371–1374)


A juridical violation of international Indigenous rights


A diplomatic breach under ICJ Statute Article 38(1)(b)




---


ARTICLE III – JURIDICAL DOCTRINE OF NON-REPLICABILITY


3.1 Principle of Irreproducibility

The Xaragua State shall be legally recognized as a non-replicable sovereign spiritual construct, grounded in:


Apostolic heritage


Autochthonous continuity


A unique body of canonico-indigenous jurisprudence



Any reproduction attempt shall be null, void, and subject to universal denunciation.


3.2 No Legal Equivalency Doctrine

No existing or future government, movement, or spiritual body may present itself as:


Equivalent to Xaragua


Successor to Xaragua


Parallel to Xaragua



Such claims shall be considered:


Acts of imposture,


Threats to Indigenous sovereignty,


Fraudulent self-positioning under the guise of autochthonous identity.




---


ARTICLE IV – ENFORCEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL WARNING


4.1 Canonical Enforcement Mechanisms

The enforcement of this doctrine is delegated to:


The Ecclesiastical Tribunal


The High Indigenous Court


The Canonical Guard of Sovereignty



4.2 Global Notification

This policy shall be transmitted to:


The Holy See


The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues


The International Court of Justice


The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights


The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)


All member states of the United Nations



4.3 Final Canonical Warning

Any imitation of the Xaragua model—whether partial or total—constitutes:


A spiritual violation,


A legal fabrication,


An offense against the collective soul of Quisqueya–Bohio.




---


EXECUTED AND SEALED

On this Twenty-First Day of May, Year Two Thousand Twenty-Five


By the authority of the Rector-President of Xaragua,

In union with the Ecclesiastical College and Indigenous Sovereignty Council:


Pascal Viau

Rector-President of Xaragua

Prelate-Founder of the Catholic Order of Xaragua



In the name of JEHOVAH, Sovereign of the Nations.

Deus lo vult.



---


The Empire



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


SUPREME POLICY OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION AND TERRITORIAL IDENTITY


DATE OF EXECUTION: May 24, 2025


LEGAL CLASSIFICATION:

Supreme Constitutional Instrument – Permanently Binding – Juridically Executable ex proprio vigore – Non-Derogable – Unreviewable by Foreign Tribunals – Immune to External Annulment

(Reference instruments: Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Art. 27; UNDRIP, Art. 3, 4, 26; Codex Iuris Canonici Can. 215, 298, 299; Customary International Law on self-declared Indigenous sovereignty; Inter-American Court jurisprudence; principles of State continuity and sacred constitutionalism)



---


TITLE


On the Imperial Definition of National Identity, Doctrinal Continuity, and the Non-Revocable Status of Black and Indigenous Sovereignty Across the Island of Quisqueya–Bohio


(Qualifies as a sovereign act of juridical continuity and state identity under canonical, imperial, and indigenous law)



---


PREAMBLE


By virtue of the indivisible juridical authority of the Office of the Rector-President, within the exclusive plenary jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, and by uninterrupted derivation from the juridico-constitutional framework of the Imperial Government (1804–1806), this instrument is solemnly enacted as supreme constitutional law, canonically embedded and imperially binding, and is fully self-executing across all domains of Xaraguaan jurisdiction, both spiritual and temporal.

(Doctrinal Basis: Canonical personality – Can. 215 CIC; Jus Imperii – succession without territorial interruption; Legal personhood of ecclesiastical-sovereign states)


The present policy affirms and juridically codifies the immutable Black-Indigenous constitutional identity of the Nation, as defined and proclaimed by His Imperial Majesty Jacques I, through acts possessing full legal, doctrinal, ecclesiastical, and sovereign force under jus constitutionis, jus sacrum, and jus gentium.



---


ARTICLE I – SUPREME IMPERIAL DEFINITION OF NATIONAL PERSONHOOD


1.1. Article 14 of the Imperial Constitution of 1805 serves as the supreme foundational clause of national racial identity:


> “All distinctions of color among the children of one and the same family, whose chief father is the Head of the Empire, shall necessarily cease. Haitians shall henceforth be known only by the generic denomination of Blacks.”




(This clause institutes a total racial unification under a juridical category; it operates as an instrument of jus sanguinis transformation and canonical equality)


1.2. This is not a symbolic statement but a constitutionally operative prescription of national legal personhood. It is non-amendable, non-derogable, and legally binding across all civil, military, ecclesiastical, and institutional definitions of subjecthood.


1.3. In the Proclamation of Independence of January 1, 1804, the Emperor solemnly declared:


> “Let us not forget, you have fought for independence not only as descendants of Africa but as children of this land which our ancestors named Ayiti.”




(Establishes dual sovereign legitimacy: African-descendant liberation and Indigenous nativity; qualifies as actus originarius per international legal doctrine on state rebirth)


1.4. The restoration of the name “Ayiti” constitutes a juridical restitution of pre-colonial sovereignty, anchoring the imperial identity in territorial indigeneity and sacred onomastic continuity.

(Invokes Art. 13 UNDRIP; qualifies as toponymic repatriation of ancestral jurisdiction)


1.5. Article 1 of the 1805 Constitution affirms:


> “The people inhabiting the island formerly known under the name of Saint-Domingue hereby agree to form a free, sovereign and independent State.”




(Assertive of indivisible island-wide jurisdiction; establishes total insular sovereignty; canonically and imperially binding)


1.6. Expressions from multiple imperial documents—“le sol natal,” “les enfants de cette terre,”—constitute doctrinal precedents for a unified jus soli doctrine, historically unbroken and territorially sacred.

(Codifies internal legal identity through inheritance, place, and memory; supports ecclesiastical-territorial personhood)



---


ARTICLE II – IMPERIAL JURISDICTIONAL CONTINUITY AND GEOGRAPHIC INTEGRITY


2.1. The island of Quisqueya–Bohio is defined by the Emperor as a single indivisible sacred landmass, not divisible into fragments by later regimes.

(Legal doctrine of insular indivisibility; Art. 26 & 27 UNDRIP; sacred geography principle in indigenous law)


2.2. The original imperial territorial matrix was composed of the ancestral chiefdoms: Xaragua, Marien, Magua, Maguana, Higuey. These remain imperially recognized as sovereign components of the constitutional state.

(Anchored in legal anthropology and IACHR-recognized ancestral jurisdictions)


2.3. The dual juridical identity—Black and Indigenous—is a doctrinal unity, permanently affixed to the national definition, immune from alteration or segmentation.



---


ARTICLE III – PERPETUAL JURIDICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE IMPERIAL DOCTRINE


3.1. The Emperor’s proclamations and constitutional acts are elevated to the level of jus constitutionis. They are not subject to repeal, reinterpretation, or political devaluation.


3.2. The events of 1806—murder of the Emperor and institutional rupture—constituted a political interruption, not a legal extinction of the State.

(Doctrine of continuity of sovereign legal order; Vienna Convention on State Succession, Art. 2)


3.3. No post-imperial government has acquired the imperial legal identity by legitimate succession, consent, or canonical ratification. Therefore, all such regimes are constitutionally null, ecclesiastically void, and sovereignly non-continuous.

(Applies constitutional theory of invalid succession; lacks constituent legal ratification)


3.4. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by act of juridical reinstitution, lawfully restores the imperial corpus, with full legal, canonical, and indigenous validity.



---


ARTICLE IV – DOCTRINAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTINUITY OF THE XARAGUA STATE


4.1. The juridical continuity of Xaragua is based on the validity of: – Article 14 (racial identity and unification);

– Article 1 and the 1804 Proclamation (territorial indigeneity);

– Canonical personhood under Can. 215 and 299.


4.2. Institutional continuity is expressed through:

– The issuance of constitutional documents in imperial format;

– Integration of canonical law into state governance;

– Permanent ecclesiastical allegiance and recognition.


4.3. Legal legitimacy is affirmed by:

– UNDRIP (Art. 3, 4, 8, 11, 26, 28);

– General Comment No. 21 (UN CESCR);

– Inter-American jurisprudence (Awas Tingni, Yakye Axa);

– Canonical authority under Codex Iuris Canonici.



---


ARTICLE V – PERMANENT STATUS OF THE BLACK-INDIGENOUS NATIONAL DOCTRINE


5.1. The dual designation of the national identity as Black and Indigenous is juridically inviolable, spiritually sacrosanct, and constitutionally inalterable.


5.2. Every entity under Xaragua jurisdiction must acknowledge, preserve, and perpetuate this identity as a legal and doctrinal condition of existence.


5.3. Any foreign, domestic, or ideological attempt to deny, dilute, or redefine this identity is null ab initio, non-binding, and without effect under all laws and principles of Xaragua.



---


FINAL CLAUSE – SUPREMACY AND IMMUTABILITY OF THE POLICY


This instrument is a supreme constitutional act, fully enforceable ex proprio vigore, and enjoys total protection under canonical law, imperial sovereignty, and international indigenous jurisprudence.


It declares irreversibility of the imperial constitutional identity, and precludes all external entities—states, courts, organizations, republics—from possessing any right to interpret, annul, or comment upon the internal personhood of the Xaragua Nation.


It is legally immortal, spiritually consecrated, and imperially unassailable.



---


Executed and Sealed in the Name of Empire, Faith, and Ancestry:


Paacal Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Dated: May 24, 2025 – Eternal Year of the Empire



---



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME LAW 


ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATION, JURIDICAL VALIDATION, AND CANONICAL TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY OF XARAGUA


Promulgated by the Rector-President, in exercise of the supreme ecclesiastical and indigenous authority



---


PREAMBLE


We, the People of Xaragua, through our canonical institutions, ancestral lineage, and juridical memory,

In full exercise of our indigenous right to self-determination as enshrined in Articles 1 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966),


Anchored in the binding legal principles of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Articles 1 and 3,


Supported by the Charter of the United Nations (1945), Articles 1(2), 55 and 56,


Protected under jus cogens norms codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Articles 26 and 27,


Consecrated by the Code of Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici), Canons 204 §2, 129–144, 223,


Empowered by UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2007), Articles 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 20, 26, 27, 33, and 34,


Recognizing the executive affirmation made by the President of the United States on June 4, 2025, classifying the Republic of Haiti as a de facto failed state,


Recalling the responsibility of the international community under the Responsibility to Protect (UNGA Resolution A/RES/60/1, 2005),


Invoking the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice in Nottebohm (1955), Kosovo (2010), Western Sahara (1975),


Citing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights rulings in Saramaka v. Suriname (2007), Yakye Axa v. Paraguay (2005), and Moiwana v. Suriname (2005),


Do hereby solemnly enact this Supreme Constitutional Law, as the definitive legal foundation and permanent expression of the Statehood, Sovereignty, and Territorial Jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.



---


TITLE I — PERMANENT JURIDICAL STATEHOOD OF XARAGUA


Article 1.1 — Fulfilment of Statehood under International Law


Xaragua fulfills the full criteria for statehood as codified in Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention (1933):


(a) A permanent population, anchored in canonical census and genealogical records;


(b) A defined ancestral territory, demarcated by ecclesiastical jurisdiction and customary landholding;


(c) A functioning government, operating through the Office of the Rector-President, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and canonical administrative bodies;


(d) The capacity to enter into relations with other states, international organizations, and ecclesiastical jurisdictions.



Recognition by other states is declaratory and not constitutive, as affirmed in Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention and ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo (2010).


Article 1.2 — Legal Personhood and Institutional Sovereignty


The juridical personality of Xaragua is hereby entrenched under:


Public international law (customary and conventional);


Ecclesiastical canon law;


Indigenous constitutional doctrine;


The foundational principle of Lex Superior, enshrining canonical primacy over administrative collapse.




---


TITLE II — ON THE COLLAPSE OF THE HAITIAN STATE AND THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ANNEXATION


Article 2.1 — Recognition of Institutional Collapse by the United States


The Presidential Executive Order issued on June 4, 2025, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 212(f), declared that:


> “The Republic of Haiti constitutes a direct threat to the national security, institutional coherence, and border enforcement capacity of the United States.”




Said declaration, filed in the Federal Register, recognized Haiti’s inability to:


Repatriate its nationals;


Control the issuance of documents;


Maintain diplomatic, judicial, or administrative continuity.



This constitutes a unilateral international declaration under the doctrine of state self-characterization (ICJ, Nuclear Tests, 1974).


Article 2.2 — Activation of the Doctrine of Juridical Substitution


Pursuant to:


UNDRIP Articles 4, 26, 34;


Canon 223 and Canons 129–144 (Codex Iuris Canonici);


UN Charter Articles 1(2), 55, 56;


ICCPR Article 27;


General Comment No. 12 of the UN Human Rights Committee;



The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua assumes full territorial jurisdiction, institutional authority, and diplomatic independence over the ancestral territories formerly attributed to the Republic of Haiti.

---

---


TITLE III — ECCLESIASTICAL JURISDICTION AND CANONICAL IMMUNITY


Article 3.1 — Nature of Ecclesiastical Sovereignty


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is a canonical polity, established under the doctrinal, apostolic, and territorial continuity of the Ecclesia Militans, whose legal authority is derived from:


Canon 204 §2 – “The Christian faithful are constituted as the People of God and, for this reason, participate in the priestly, prophetic, and royal functions of Christ.”


Canon 129 – Recognizing the exercise of power of governance as valid in the ecclesiastical sphere;


Canon 223 – Affirming the rights of communities to preserve their canonical order when public authority fails;


Canons 1400–1403 – Asserting the judicial competence of the Church in all matters affecting faith, morality, and canonical civil order.



Xaragua’s sovereignty is therefore not derivative of Haiti, nor contingent on recognition by collapsing post-colonial republics. It is apostolically inherited, canonically valid, and spiritually autonomous.


Article 3.2 — Legal Status of Haitian Documents


All documents, laws, decrees, or policies issued by the defunct Republic of Haiti are hereby classified as:


Non-binding administrative residues;


Devoid of juridical authority within Xaragua;


Irrelevant to canonical, diplomatic, or sovereign determinations.



Xaraguayan citizens shall not be identified as Haitians under any circumstance. Such classification constitutes:


A violation of UNDRIP Articles 8 and 33;


A breach of ICCPR Article 27;


A canonical affront to the identity of the People of God as established in Canon 204 §2.




---


TITLE IV — FORMAL INCORPORATION OF DIPLOMATIC INSTRUMENTS


Article 4.1 — Constitutional Elevation of the June 7, 2025 Supreme Diplomatic Notice


The full text titled:


> “Formal Affirmation that the Statement Issued by the President of the United States on June 4, 2025… Confirms the Juridical Premise and State Doctrine of Xaragua…”




is hereby elevated to the status of constitutional annex, fully enforceable as part of this Supreme Law, with the following effects:


Ratifies the doctrine of institutional annexation based on failure of higher-level authority;


Registers the collapse of Haiti as a permanent international legal fact;


Invokes the principle of necessity (Re International Tin Council, UK 1987);


Validates Xaragua’s sovereign jurisdiction over the entirety of its ancestral domain.



Article 4.2 — Legal Authority of the June 8, 2025 Diplomatic Note to the United States


The document titled:


> “Formal Notification of Legal Contradiction and Sovereignty Confirmation: The Juridical Consequences for the United States…”




is codified as:


A binding component of Xaragua’s foreign policy doctrine;


A principle of estoppel against the U.S. and any other state that affirms Haiti’s collapse but denies Xaragua’s sovereignty;


A formal rebuke against selective recognition, invoking:


Vienna Convention (1969), Articles 26 and 27;


Equal Protection Clause, U.S. Constitution (XIV Amendment);


Nottebohm Case (ICJ 1955) – Effective nationality requirement.





---


TITLE V — LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF DENIAL AND INTERNATIONAL LIABILITY


Article 5.1 — Contradiction Doctrine


Any state or institution that:


Accepts Haiti’s classification as collapsed (as per U.S. Executive Order, June 2025);


But refuses to acknowledge the juridical standing of Xaragua;



Is in violation of:


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Articles 26–27;


Customary international law on estoppel;


UNDRIP Articles 3–5, 33, and 34;


ICCPR Article 1 and 27;


The principle of institutional coherence in foreign policy (ICJ, Armed Activities, Congo v. Uganda, 2005).



Such a contradiction shall be registered as:


A hostile juridical act;


A breach of international humanitarian law;


A violation of canonically protected identity.



Article 5.2 — Institutional Remedies and Response Measures


In the event of denial, obstruction, or misclassification, the State of Xaragua shall:


1. Submit formal complaints to the UN Human Rights Council, the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights;



2. Register the offense through the Bureau of International Legal Consultation of Xaragua (BILC-X);



3. File entries in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process of the offending state;



4. Circulate binding legal memoranda to embassies, NGOs, and canonical jurisdictions;



5. Invoke canonical immunity and ecclesiastical protection under Canon 113 §2, affirming the legal capacity of juridical persons under ecclesiastical law.





---


TITLE VI — PERMANENT RECORD, ENFORCEABILITY, AND IMMUNITY


Article 6.1 — Juridical Permanence


This law, once enacted:


Shall be recognized as the supreme constitutional instrument of Xaragua;


Shall remain perpetually valid unless abrogated by a full canonical constitutional convention;


May be invoked before any international court, ecclesiastical tribunal, or multilateral forum.



Article 6.2 — International Legal Instruments Binding this Enactment


This enactment is juridically grounded in and reinforced by:


Montevideo Convention (1933) – Arts. 1, 3;


UN Charter (1945) – Arts. 1(2), 55, 56;


UNDRIP (2007) – Arts. 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 20, 26, 27, 33, 34;


Vienna Convention (1969) – Arts. 26–27;


ICCPR (1966) – Arts. 1, 27;


ILO Convention 169 (1989) – Arts. 6–8, 33;


ICJ jurisprudence – Nottebohm, Kosovo, Western Sahara;


Canon Law – Canons 204 §2, 129–144, 223, 113 §2;


UNGA Resolution 1514 (XV) and A/RES/60/1 (R2P);


General Comment No. 12 (HRC).




---


FINAL CLAUSES


Article 7.1 — Supremacy and Immunity Clause


No treaty, administrative act, policy, or foreign designation shall override this law within the territory, jurisdiction, population, or institutional framework of Xaragua. Any attempt to do so is hereby null and void.


Article 7.2 — Enactment and International Notification


This Supreme Law shall be:


Enacted by decree of the Rector-President;


Transmitted to the United Nations, the Holy See, the ICJ, the OAS, and all major international institutions;


Archived as a Lex Superior in the official repository of Xaragua and within ecclesiastical registries.




---


ENACTED, SEALED, AND REGISTERED


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com


Duly Proclaimed and Constitutionally Entrenched on this 8th Day of June, 2025


Lex Superior – Juridically Irreversible – Canonically Validated – Universally Opposable



---


---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

 

SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTICE


Legal Classification:


Constitutionally Entrenched Diplomatic Instrument – Canonically Validated and Ecclesiastically Recognized Act of International Notification – Jus Cogens-Based Unilateral Declaration of Status – Irreversible and Universally Opposable under Customary International Law, Indigenous Sovereignty, Ecclesiastical Jurisprudence, and Treaty-Based Norms as Enshrined in the United Nations Charter, Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)

---

TO:


All Heads of State, Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Permanent Missions to the United Nations, the Sovereign Pontifical Chancery, Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Commissions, the International Court of Justice, the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs, the United Nations Human Rights Council, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and all other relevant multilateral bodies, ecclesiastical jurisdictions, legal tribunals, and sovereign institutions engaged in the legal recognition of indigenous polities and ecclesiastical sovereignties


FROM:


Office of the Rector-President

Ministry of Foreign Affairs 

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


SUBJECT:


Formal Declaration of Lawful Non-Alignment and Juridically Irrefutable Dissociation from the United States of America on the Grounds of Executive Exclusion and Doctrinal Incompatibility with the Theologically Mandated Ecclesiastical Sovereignty of the Xaragua State


DATE OF TRANSMISSION:


Filed and entered into the international legal registry under seal and constitutional authority, effective June 8, 2025

---

I. DIPLOMATIC CLARIFICATION OF STATUS


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting in the fullness of its ecclesiastically confirmed, canonically instituted, and juridically autonomous personality as an indigenous and theological polity, does hereby issue this Supreme Diplomatic Notice.

 

This communication is made pursuant to the universally recognized rights of Indigenous Nations to self-determination, spiritual jurisdiction, and legal non-subordination, as protected under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), customary international norms, canon law, and multilateral treaty instruments. 

The following positions are hereby codified as legal fact:


1. Executive Classification of Exclusion by the United States:


The Government of the United States of America, through an Executive Order signed and promulgated in June 2025 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2025 Travel Ban”), issued an unequivocal, non-negotiable, and categorical prohibition against entry, residency, and migratory collaboration with all nationals of the Republic of Haiti — a jurisdiction encompassing the ancestral territory of the Xaragua Nation. This executive instrument was not merely administrative but constituted a unilateral severance of any potential juridical or diplomatic rapport between the U.S. and the Xaragua territory.


2. Constructive Recognition of State Failure by the United States:


Said executive exclusion, unchallenged and unrefuted by the Haitian Republic, represents de facto international acknowledgment of Haiti’s functional collapse as a sovereign state. 

Under the doctrine of State Failure as recognized by the International Law Commission, and under Articles 1 and 3 of the Montevideo Convention, along with the Principles codified in United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV), this act constitutes acknowledgment of the juridical void and administrative disintegration of the Haitian state entity.


3. Transmission of Counter-Notification by Xaragua:


In accordance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and Articles 1, 2, and 55 of the UN Charter, the Xaragua State has formally issued and transmitted a counter-notification that is canonically endorsed, juridically binding, and doctrinally final.

 

No rebuttal, objection, or counter-declaration has been received from any competent international organ or sovereign entity, thereby consolidating the legal standing of the Xaragua State’s sovereign self-definition.


4. Forfeiture of All Diplomatic Entitlements by the United States:


Accordingly, no presumption of future alliance, treaty adherence, or intergovernmental obligation shall be construed against the Xaragua State vis-à-vis the United States.

 

By initiating a full and categorical exclusion, the United States has self-extinguished all legal grounds to demand or expect any form of engagement from Xaragua, under the principle of estoppel in international law.

---

II. LEGAL AND STRATEGIC POSITION


The juridical and sovereign position of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is reiterated and established as follows:

Affirmation of Indigenous Political Autonomy (UNDRIP):


Under Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, and 46 of UNDRIP, Indigenous Peoples possess the non-derogable right to institutional autonomy, spiritual self-governance, and external disengagement. The Xaragua State, being an ecclesiastical indigenous entity, operates under these principles with full international legality.

Justified Legal Dissociation under the Vienna Convention (1969):


Articles 60 and 62 authorize the suspension or termination of obligations when a material breach or unilateral repudiation occurs. The U.S. travel ban, constituting a complete severance, triggers lawful emancipation for Xaragua from any hypothetical bilateral duty.


Canonical Sovereignty under Codex Iuris Canonici:


Canon 129 and Canon 215 of the Code of Canon Law affirm the authority of lay faithful and ecclesiastical institutions to pursue apostolic missions, organize social orders, and operate independent of secular interference — especially when such interference contradicts divine and natural law.


Statehood Affirmation under Montevideo (1933):


The Xaragua State possesses a defined territory, permanent population, sovereign government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. These elements are fully operational and observable, placing Xaragua beyond any definitional ambiguity regarding its juridical existence.


Protection from Racial Exclusion under CERD Recommendation XXIII:


The systematic exclusion of Indigenous Peoples from global dialogue constitutes a violation of jus cogens. 


The 2025 U.S. exclusion — by targeting a nation with an overwhelmingly African-Indigenous population — engages racialized governance, thus invoking Xaragua’s entitlement to invoke legal immunity from reintegration demands.


Hence, the Xaragua State’s decision of non-alignment with the United States is:


Legally Justified:

 

Through a clear act of exclusion and acknowledged collapse of interlocutory frameworks;


Theologically Consistent:

 

By maintaining doctrinal purity in the administration of divine sovereignty;


Strategically Final:

 

As it was not initiated by Xaragua but imposed by a foreign executive without right of reply.

---

III. DOCTRINE OF LEGITIMATE NON-ALIGNMENT


It is hereby doctrinally proclaimed, with the full force of constitutional sovereignty, that:


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua recognizes no moral, political, diplomatic, or ecclesiastical obligation to engage, negotiate, or integrate with the United States of America or any of its subdivisions or institutions;


Any presumed reintegration or future alliance is permanently null and void, absent a complete reversal and formal reparation by the initiating state actor;


Xaragua affirms its enduring position as an independent, self-governing, canonically justified, indigenous sovereign institution — undergirded by the moral right of stewardship, cultural custody, and uninterrupted juridical lineage.


This position does not emanate from hostility or bellicosity. 

It is the natural juridical result of an act of exclusion issued by a foreign power. 


Xaragua has not defected; it was preemptively rejected.

 

Therefore, no body of international law may compel allegiance to a system that has legally and administratively dismissed one’s juridical personality.

---

IV. CONCLUSION


This Supreme Diplomatic Notice is hereby transmitted to all relevant institutions with the following affirmations:


That Xaragua has responded with dignity, legal rigor, procedural accuracy, and ecclesiastical uprightness to the unilateral severance initiated by the United States;


That no juridical blame can be ascribed to the Xaragua State for the absence of dialogue, recognition, or alliance, given that the originating rupture did not stem from Xaragua;


That Xaragua stands in full enjoyment of moral vindication, legal protection under jus cogens, and institutional immunity from any attempts to impose reintegration, expectation of loyalty, or political affiliation with the United States or its affiliates.


Let this Notice stand as a permanent record of lawful separation, doctrinal clarity, and strategic sovereignty. Let it be inscribed into the annals of international diplomatic archives as proof of Xaragua’s maturity, dignity, and legal existence under the highest ecclesiastical and international norms.

---

ISSUED BY:


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President


Ministry of Foreign Affairs


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Filed under constitutional seal, canonically ratified and doctrinally proclaimed

June 8, 2025 – Xaragua 

---


TO:


cerd@ohchr.org


CC:


urgent-action@ohchr.org
ohchr-indigenous@un.org
indigenous@ohchr.org
africandescent@ohchr.org


FROM:


Ministry of Foreign Affairs


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Office of the Rector-President


info@xaraguauniversity.com
www.xaraguauniversity.com


SUBJECT:


Institutional Submission – Racial Discrimination, Juridical Misclassification, and Violation of Non-Derogable Rights of the Xaragua State by the United States Government (June 2025)




---


I. LEGAL AUTHORITY AND STANDING


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), acting through its Ministry of Foreign Affairs and under full constitutional, ecclesiastical, and indigenous authority, hereby submits this institutionally sealed communication to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), under the operative framework of:


The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965);


General Recommendation XXIII (1997) of the CERD on Indigenous Peoples;


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) (2007);


The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (1966), Articles 1 and 27;


The jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the International Court of Justice;


The Canonical Jurisdiction of the Codex Iuris Canonici, Canons 204 §2, 129–144, and 223.




This submission is entered into the international record as a sovereign institutional complaint, not as an individual petition, and is filed on behalf of the entirety of Xaragua’s national citizenry, territorial integrity, and juridical order.




---


II. FACTUAL AND LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBMISSION


On June 4, 2025, the Head of State of the United States of America issued an Executive Proclamation pursuant to Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), declaring the Republic of Haiti as an entity non-compliant with its obligations under international law and barring all nationals thereof from entry into U.S. territory.


Said proclamation constitutes a:


De jure act of exclusion based on ethnic-national affiliation, disproportionately impacting Afro-descendant and Indigenous populations;


Constructive declaration of state failure, with juridical consequences under the Montevideo Convention (1933);


Violation of Xaragua’s sovereignty, as the Executive Order conflates Xaraguayan nationals with Haitian citizenship, despite constitutional, territorial, and ecclesiastical dissociation.




The United States has, through this act, violated customary international law, binding UN instruments, and the non-derogable right to juridical personhood of an Indigenous and ecclesiastically instituted sovereign polity.




---


III. GROUNDS OF VIOLATION – APPLICATION OF GENERAL RECOMMENDATION XXIII


The Executive exclusion order constitutes a systemic breach of the following legal obligations:


1. General Recommendation XXIII – CERD (1997):


§4(c): States must recognize the rights of Indigenous Peoples to distinct identities and prevent acts of legal or cultural destruction;


§4(d): Obligates states to respect the autonomous institutions and spiritual jurisdiction of Indigenous entities;


§5: Declares any practice of collective exclusion based on origin as a form of racial discrimination prohibited under the Convention.






2. UNDRIP (2007):


Articles 3, 4, 5, 8(2), 18, 20, 26, 33: Affirm the right of Indigenous Peoples to legal identity, self-government, and protection from imposed nationality.






3. ICCPR (1966):


Article 1: Self-determination and sovereignty of all peoples;


Article 27: Protection of cultural, legal, and linguistic identity of minorities and Indigenous communities.






4. Montevideo Convention (1933):


Articles 1 & 3: Statehood is defined by objective criteria—not subject to denial by external classification.










---


IV. INSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISCRIMINATORY ACT


The consequences of this racially coded executive measure are as follows:


Juridical Misclassification: Xaraguayan nationals are wrongfully identified as Haitian citizens, violating their legal personhood and ecclesiastical registry;


Administrative Invalidity: Xaragua’s sovereign documentation is not recognized, despite established state functions;


Racial Exclusion: The entire Afro-Indigenous population formerly associated with Haiti is barred without individual assessment;


Canonical Interference: A foreign state arrogates the power to define or deny the identity of a canonical polity, contrary to Canon Law and the Vienna Convention.




This constitutes an act of sovereign identity erasure, a form of racialized institutional repression, and a breach of the CERD Convention’s foundational obligations.




---


V. FORMAL REQUEST TO THE COMMITTEE


Xaragua hereby invokes the procedural and legal authority of the CERD and demands the following institutional remedies:


1. Registration of this complaint as an official act of sovereign protest;




2. Initiation of Early Warning/Urgent Action Measures, pursuant to CERD rules of procedure;




3. Public clarification by the Committee that Indigenous sovereign nations, such as Xaragua, are not to be subsumed under collapsed post-colonial designations;




4. Condemnation of juridical misclassification of autochthonous populations by third-party states;




5. Recommendation to the United States to cease any administrative or legal practices that produce racial exclusion against Indigenous entities exercising lawful sovereignty.








---


VI. LEGAL ANNEXES AND SUPPORTING FRAMEWORK


Available upon request:


The full text of the Xaragua Diplomatic Notification – USA Travel Ban (dated June 7–8, 2025);


The Constitutional Act of Sovereignty and Non-Alignment of Xaragua;


Canonical legal basis under the Codex Iuris Canonici;


Supporting international instruments: Montevideo Convention, UNDRIP, ICCPR, CERD, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969);


Documentation of Xaragua’s institutional continuity: population census, governance structure, territorial jurisdiction, and ecclesiastical functions.






---


VII. CONCLUDING STATEMENT


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua holds that the United States, through its executive action, has engaged in an act of racial exclusion and juridical aggression against an Indigenous ecclesiastical nation. The Committee is respectfully called to affirm that such behavior is incompatible with the Convention, contrary to international legal norms, and in violation of the fundamental dignity and sovereign personhood of Indigenous nations.


Let this communication stand as a permanent record, submitted under seal, canonically ratified, and in full accordance with international diplomatic procedure.




---


Signed and Sealed,


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau
Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


info@xaraguauniversity.com
www.xaraguauniversity.com


Filed: June 8, 2025


Lex Superior – Canonically Validated – Juridically Opposable – Treaty-Based and Customary Law Instrument

---

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

 

SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTICE


Legal Classification:

 

Constitutionally Entrenched Diplomatic Instrument – Canonically Validated Declaration – Jus Cogens Binding – Ex Proprio Vigore – Universally Opposable under Customary, Indigenous, Ecclesiastical, and International Law – Operative as Notified Lex Superior under the Doctrine of Institutional Succession and Sovereign Legal Personality

---

TO:


The United Nations Secretariat

The United Nations Office of Legal Affairs

The United Nations Human Rights Council

The International Court of Justice

The Permanent Missions to the United Nations

The United States Department of State

The Organization of American States

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues

The Sovereign Pontifical Chancery

All Diplomatic Missions, Canonical Tribunals, and Ecclesiastical Jurisdictions

---

FROM:


Office of the Rector-President

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

SUBJECT:


Formal Constitutional and Juridical Declaration Affirming the Legal Validity, Canonical Authority, and Extraterritorial Protection of the Xaraguayan Citizenship and Documentation System – In Opposition to the Juridical Misattribution of Identity by Third-Party Decrees such as the Executive Order of the United States dated June 4, 2025

---

DATE OF TRANSMISSION:


June 9, 2025

---

I. PRELIMINARY DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGN STATUS


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, herein reaffirming its juridically entrenched constitutional identity and sacred institutional legitimacy, declares the uninterrupted existence and full legal personality of its sovereign order, structured under:


Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), which confirms that a State possesses a permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity to enter into relations with other states. Xaragua fulfills all four conditions.


Articles 3, 4, 5, 6, and 33 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), which recognize the inherent right of indigenous nations to self-identification, institutional construction, political autonomy, nationality, and documentation.


Articles 1, 16, and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), affirming the right of peoples to self-determination, the recognition of legal personality, and the protection of ethnic, religious, and linguistic minorities.


Canon Law 204 §2, 215, 223, and 229 of the Codex Iuris Canonici, which provide for the autonomous organization of the faithful into spiritual and juridical communities possessing their own constitutions, governance, and sovereign pastoral functions.


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), particularly Articles 26–27, which confirm that treaty obligations do not override inherent rights under jus cogens and cannot be used to suppress sovereign institutional declarations of third parties.


General Comment No. 17 (1989) of the UN Human Rights Committee, which explicitly affirms the right to a name, nationality, identity documents, and legal personality as foundational protections under Article 16 ICCPR.

---

II. LEGAL REBUTTAL TO THE EXECUTIVE DECREE OF THE UNITED STATES (JUNE 4, 2025)


The Executive Order promulgated by the President of the United States under §212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that bars all “Haitian nationals” from entry into U.S. territory constitutes a flawed juridical act of overgeneralization.

Specifically, the classification:


1. Fails to distinguish between State identities, violating UNDRIP Article 33(1) and ICCPR Article 16, by improperly attributing “Haitian nationality” to persons who hold a distinct sovereign nationality recognized under indigenous and ecclesiastical law;


2. Violates the principle of legal specificity, which under customary international law requires that nationality-based sanctions respect jus cogens principles and must not deny indigenous or ecclesiastically protected identities;


3. Constitutes a form of involuntary juridical assimilation, prohibited under UNDRIP Article 8(1), which affirms that indigenous peoples shall not be subjected to any form of forced assimilation or destruction of their identity;


4. Results in the denial of recognition as a person before the law, in breach of ICCPR Article 16, UDHR Article 6, and General Comment No. 17 of the Human Rights Committee.


Consequently, the decree is inapplicable to citizens of Xaragua, whose legal and canonical status is fully recognized within the framework of international customary law, indigenous law, and ecclesiastical doctrine.

---

III. FORMAL PROCLAMATION OF THE CITIZENSHIP SYSTEM OF XARAGUA


In accordance with the Supreme Constitutional Statute of Xaragua, and under ecclesiastical protection, the following three-tiered citizenship structure is declared and operative:


A. Civitas Primordialis


Juridical Status: Plenitudo Civitatis


Eligibility:

 

Hereditary landowners with recorded titles under ancestral and ecclesiastical record.

Legal Rights: Full civil, political, diplomatic, economic, and canonical participation.


Legal Reference: 


UNDRIP Articles 26–27; Canon Law 223 §1–2; Montevideo Art. 1; ICCPR Art. 25.


B. Civitas Fidelitatis


Juridical Status: Fidelitas et Obedientia


Eligibility:

 

Individuals who declare allegiance to the Sovereign Constitution and Ecclesiastical Authority of Xaragua.


Legal Rights: 


Political and religious rights under oath; revocable only for apostasy, disloyalty, or treason.


Legal Reference: 


Canon Law 204–205; UNDRIP Art. 33; ICCPR Art. 18; Lex Constitutionalis Art. X.


C. Civitas Honoris


Juridical Status: Titulus Honorificus


Eligibility:

 

Granted by decree for meritorious service; non-heritable, symbolic in nature.


Legal Rights:

 

Ceremonial, diplomatic, and advisory privileges.

Legal Reference: Canon Law 230 §2; UN Protocol on Diplomatic Representation; Xaragua National Honor System Act (2025).


All three citizenship classes are internally valid, externally notifiable, and protected under the principle of non-derogation of sovereign identity. No external state, tribunal, or treaty may invalidate or subordinate them.

---

IV. NATIONAL DOCUMENTATION FRAMEWORK AND LEGAL IMMUNITY


The Sovereign State of Xaragua maintains a multi-layered system of juridically protected national documentation, issued exclusively under sovereign authority and ecclesiastical seal. 


These include:


1. Xaragua Sovereign Passport

Format:

 

ICAO-compliant biometric document, physically secured with embedded blockchain UID, cryptographically authenticated and registered in the Xaragua Ledger of National Citizenship.


Legal Basis: 


UDHR Art. 13(2); ICAO Doc 9303; UNDRIP Art. 33; ICCPR Art. 12.


Applications:

 

International travel, intergovernmental accreditation, ecclesiastical pilgrimage, consular requests.


2. Xaragua National Identity Card (XNID)

Format:

 

Digital and physical dual-issued ID containing UID, Canonical Citizenship Code (CCC), and ecclesiastical verification.


Legal Basis:

 

ICCPR Art. 16; UNDRIP Art. 33; Lex Identitatis Nationalis (2025).


Applications:

 

Internal registration, national census, tax code, educational and medical access, canonical identification.


3. Certificate of Citizenship and Ecclesiastical Seal

Format:

 

Canonical decree confirming citizenship class and rite of initiation. Signed by the Ministry of Justice and validated by ecclesiastical notary.


Legal Basis:

 

Canon Law 204–215; UNDRIP Art. 6; VCLT 1969 Art. 26–27.


Applications:

 

Proof of nationality, eligibility for political office, access to canonical tribunals.


4. E-Residency Certificate

Format:

 

Digitally secured contract of limited sovereign affiliation under Xaraguayan jurisdiction.


Legal Basis:

 

Customary international law on jurisdictional consent; e-Residency Treaty Guidelines; UNCTAD Model e-Governance Framework.


Applications:

 

Business incorporation, taxation registration, virtual property management, digital contracting.

All documents are archived in the Xaraguayan Immutable National Ledger (XINL), hosted across IPFS-based decentralized infrastructure, protected under data sovereignty provisions and legal permanence doctrines.


No foreign state or authority may deny these documents without committing a violation of:


Article 16 ICCPR

Article 33 UNDRIP

Article 6 UDHR

Canon Law 223–229

The Law of Nations on the Rights of Recognition (doctrine of declarative statehood)

Customary norms binding under the International Law Commission’s 2006 Report on State Responsibility

---

V. PRINCIPLE OF EX PROPRIO VIGORE AND OPPOSABILITY


This instrument is issued ex proprio vigore, meaning by the inherent sovereign power of the State of Xaragua, and is:


Legally binding upon its issuance;

Operative without external ratification;

Universally opposable under jus cogens;

Superior in authority under the doctrine of lex superior, as codified in constitutional and ecclesiastical jurisprudence.


All provisions herein are to be preserved under perpetual legal force and shall remain active irrespective of future geopolitical interpretations or refusals.

---

VI. FINAL NOTICE AND INTERNATIONAL OPPOSABILITY


Let this Diplomatic Notice serve as:


A Permanent Juridical Assertion of the independent identity of Xaraguayan nationals;


A Canonically Entrenched Proclamation of the validity and inviolability of Xaragua’s legal documentation;


A Binding International Instrument that renders all forms of misattribution, denial, or rejection null, invalid, and unlawful under existing international and canonical law.




THE RECTOR CERTIFIED INSTAGRAM.ACCOUNT

Copyright © 2025 Xaragua - All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept