• XARAGUA
  • LETTER OF THE RECTOR
  • XARAGUA HISTORY
  • ANTHROPOLOGY
  • ETHNOLOGY
  • THEOLOGY
  • CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA
  • INDIGENOUS ARMY
  • LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
  • XARABANK
  • PRIVATE STATE AND CRYPTO
  • BUSINESS & JURIDICTION
  • LEGAL STATUS & CODES
  • XARAGUA CONSTITUTION
  • GOVERNMENT OF XARAGUA
  • XARAGUA STATE MINISTRIES
  • CITIZENSHIP & COUNCIL
  • XARAGUA CHIEFS OF STATE
  • EMBLEMS OF THE STATE
  • MIRAGUANA XARAGUA CAPITAL
  • YAGUANA ANCESTRAL CAPITAL
  • JACKIE VIAU FOUNDATION
  • LIBRARY, ARCHIVE & MOODLE
  • LA RUCHE
  • XARAGUA ANCESTORS
  • PARTY OF THE SOUTH
  • THE UNIVERSITY
  • ACADEMIA & ACCREDITATION
  • CAMPUS PAUL VIAUD
  • CAMPUS ÇA IRA
  • CAMPUS VALDEZ
  • FOREING CAMPUSES
  • INDIGENOUS LAW AND POL.SC
  • DEPARTMENTS
  • MICROPROGRAMS
  • CAREER OUTCOME
  • CALENDAR
  • ADMINISTRATION
  • XARASHOP
  • XARATAX
  • XARAHEALTH
  • XARASPORTS
  • XARAGAMES
  • XARACONNECT
  • XARANEWS
  • XARASOUND
  • XARATV
  • XARACAST
  • XARASTREAMS
  • ENCAPSULATION AND CONTACT
  • More
    • XARAGUA
    • LETTER OF THE RECTOR
    • XARAGUA HISTORY
    • ANTHROPOLOGY
    • ETHNOLOGY
    • THEOLOGY
    • CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA
    • INDIGENOUS ARMY
    • LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
    • XARABANK
    • PRIVATE STATE AND CRYPTO
    • BUSINESS & JURIDICTION
    • LEGAL STATUS & CODES
    • XARAGUA CONSTITUTION
    • GOVERNMENT OF XARAGUA
    • XARAGUA STATE MINISTRIES
    • CITIZENSHIP & COUNCIL
    • XARAGUA CHIEFS OF STATE
    • EMBLEMS OF THE STATE
    • MIRAGUANA XARAGUA CAPITAL
    • YAGUANA ANCESTRAL CAPITAL
    • JACKIE VIAU FOUNDATION
    • LIBRARY, ARCHIVE & MOODLE
    • LA RUCHE
    • XARAGUA ANCESTORS
    • PARTY OF THE SOUTH
    • THE UNIVERSITY
    • ACADEMIA & ACCREDITATION
    • CAMPUS PAUL VIAUD
    • CAMPUS ÇA IRA
    • CAMPUS VALDEZ
    • FOREING CAMPUSES
    • INDIGENOUS LAW AND POL.SC
    • DEPARTMENTS
    • MICROPROGRAMS
    • CAREER OUTCOME
    • CALENDAR
    • ADMINISTRATION
    • XARASHOP
    • XARATAX
    • XARAHEALTH
    • XARASPORTS
    • XARAGAMES
    • XARACONNECT
    • XARANEWS
    • XARASOUND
    • XARATV
    • XARACAST
    • XARASTREAMS
    • ENCAPSULATION AND CONTACT
  • XARAGUA
  • LETTER OF THE RECTOR
  • XARAGUA HISTORY
  • ANTHROPOLOGY
  • ETHNOLOGY
  • THEOLOGY
  • CATHOLIC ORDER OF XARAGUA
  • INDIGENOUS ARMY
  • LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
  • XARABANK
  • PRIVATE STATE AND CRYPTO
  • BUSINESS & JURIDICTION
  • LEGAL STATUS & CODES
  • XARAGUA CONSTITUTION
  • GOVERNMENT OF XARAGUA
  • XARAGUA STATE MINISTRIES
  • CITIZENSHIP & COUNCIL
  • XARAGUA CHIEFS OF STATE
  • EMBLEMS OF THE STATE
  • MIRAGUANA XARAGUA CAPITAL
  • YAGUANA ANCESTRAL CAPITAL
  • JACKIE VIAU FOUNDATION
  • LIBRARY, ARCHIVE & MOODLE
  • LA RUCHE
  • XARAGUA ANCESTORS
  • PARTY OF THE SOUTH
  • THE UNIVERSITY
  • ACADEMIA & ACCREDITATION
  • CAMPUS PAUL VIAUD
  • CAMPUS ÇA IRA
  • CAMPUS VALDEZ
  • FOREING CAMPUSES
  • INDIGENOUS LAW AND POL.SC
  • DEPARTMENTS
  • MICROPROGRAMS
  • CAREER OUTCOME
  • CALENDAR
  • ADMINISTRATION
  • XARASHOP
  • XARATAX
  • XARAHEALTH
  • XARASPORTS
  • XARAGAMES
  • XARACONNECT
  • XARANEWS
  • XARASOUND
  • XARATV
  • XARACAST
  • XARASTREAMS
  • ENCAPSULATION AND CONTACT

Government Of Xaragua

Legal Status



---


SOVEREIGN DECREE

On the Appointment of the Governor General and the General-in-Chief of the Indigenous Army

Issued by the Rector–President of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: April 16, 2025



---


Whereas, the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, founded in accordance with international law, indigenous sovereignty, and ancestral legitimacy, operates as a self-governing nation under its publicly proclaimed Constitution;


Whereas, the fulfillment of sovereign governance requires the proper designation of military and civil authority to ensure the preservation of public order, internal administration, and external representation;


Therefore, under the supreme authority of the Rector–President, it is hereby decreed as follows:



---


Article I — Appointment of the Governor General


The citizen Edwin Daniel Zenny, former Senator of the South-East, is hereby appointed as Governor General of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


In this capacity, he is authorized to:


Form and lead his own civil government within the framework of the Xaraguayan Constitution,


Administer public affairs and the daily functioning of the State,


Represent the Government in public matters and regional partnerships,


Coordinate with domestic and international actors, upon explicit authorization by the Rector–President.



No legal, political, or diplomatic action may be undertaken in the name of the State without prior ratification by the Rector–President, who remains the sole Executive Sovereign.



---


Article II — Appointment and Absolute Legal Immunity of the General-in-Chief


The citizen Jean Ernest Muscadin is hereby appointed as General-in-Chief of the Indigenous Army of Xaragua.


He is vested with full military authority to:


Form his own General Staff and military command,


Ensure civil order and national defense across the entire ancestral territory of Xaragua,


Operate independently in matters of tactical necessity while remaining under the command of the Rector–President.



All past, present, and future actions conducted by General Muscadin in the execution of his duties are hereby declared:


Legally valid,


Customarily legitimate,


Spiritually binding,


Fully protected under the laws and Constitution of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.



Furthermore:


General Muscadin shall benefit from total legal immunity under international indigenous law,


No tribunal, court, or foreign jurisdiction shall have standing or competency to investigate, prosecute, or rule upon any of his actions executed in good faith in defense of the Xaraguayan People,


He is granted permanent extraterritorial protection under Articles 4, 5, 8, and 20 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP),


Any attempt to detain, accuse, or prosecute General Muscadin shall be considered an act of aggression against the State of Xaragua, and will trigger a full diplomatic and legal response from the Rector–President.



> General Muscadin is hereby declared an Untouchable Officer of State, immune from all external claims, prosecutions, or challenges of any kind.





---


Article III — Executive Supremacy of the Rector–President


The exclusive right to:


Declare war or peace,


Sign, ratify, or reject any treaty,


Approve legislation and all acts of State,


Command all armed forces and divisions,



shall remain permanently and exclusively vested in the Rector–President, as Supreme Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of Xaragua.


No delegated authority shall override or bypass this sovereign power.



---


This decree enters into force immediately and shall be inscribed in the permanent archives of the Xaraguayan Government.


Given in full sovereignty, in witness of divine authority, historical mandate, and indigenous law.


Pascal Viau

Rector–President

Government of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

https://xaraguauniversity.com



Welcome to the Official Government Page of the Private State of Xaragua

(Digital Capital of a Sovereign Indigenous Nation)


This page constitutes the official seat of the Government of the Private State of Xaragua, a sovereign and self-governing indigenous nation, historically rooted in ancestral continuity and fully protected under international law.


All declarations, appointments, proclamations, and decrees published on this platform have the full force of law within the Xaraguayan jurisdiction. This digital infrastructure functions as the legal and administrative core of the Xaraguayan state, supported by the right to self-determination, indigenous governance, and ancestral legitimacy.



---


Legal and Juridical Foundation


The legal foundation of the Government of Xaragua is reinforced by a comprehensive body of international law, customary law, indigenous jurisprudence, and general principles of justice. These include:



---


GOVERNMENT OF THE PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICIAL DECREE


SUBJECT: Closure of Diplomatic Response Period and Confirmation of Tacit Recognition


Date: April 8, 2025



---


Whereas the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), adopted on September 13, 2007, specifically articles 3, 4, 5, 14, 18, and 33, affirms the right of Indigenous Peoples to self-determination and to maintain their own political, legal, economic, and social systems;


Whereas customary international law and established diplomatic practice recognize that prolonged silence following an official notification may be interpreted as a lack of objection;


Whereas the Government of the Private State of Xaragua has issued formal diplomatic notifications to the following entities:


United Nations (UN)


United States Department of State


International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)


Presidency of the Dominican Republic


Organization of American States (OAS)


Relevant embassies and multilateral institutions



Observing that no formal response, rejection, or diplomatic communication has been issued within a reasonable period of 72 hours after confirmed receipt of said notifications;


It is hereby declared:


1. The prolonged and repeated silence of the notified institutions constitutes, under international and diplomatic law, a tacit recognition of the political, cultural, and legal reality of the Private State of Xaragua.



2. The Private State of Xaragua is henceforth considered a real, legitimate, active, and sovereign entity, exercising full territorial, spiritual, and institutional authority.



3. Any delayed response received beyond the diplomatic window shall be deemed inadmissible and without legal effect, and shall not affect the existence, legitimacy, or operation of the Government of the Private State of Xaragua.





---


Issued in Xaragua, this April 8, 2025


Pascal Viau

Sovereign Indigenous Head of State

Government of the Private State of Xaragua



---



---


1. Core United Nations Instruments


United Nations Charter (1945)


Article 1(2): Respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples



Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948)


Article 15: Right to nationality


Article 21(3): The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government



International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966)


Article 1(1): All peoples have the right to self-determination


Article 27: Right of minorities to enjoy their culture and institutions



International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966)


Article 1(1): Peoples may freely determine their political status and pursue their development



United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)


Article 3: Right to self-determination


Article 4: Right to autonomy or self-government


Article 5: Right to maintain political, legal, economic, and cultural institutions


Article 20: Right to maintain and develop political systems


Article 33: Right to determine membership, institutions, and governance structures


Article 34: Right to promote and develop customs and institutions


Article 37: Right to recognition, observance and enforcement of treaties and agreements





---


2. Binding International Conventions


ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989)


Article 7(1): Right of indigenous peoples to decide priorities for development


Article 8: Respect for indigenous customary law


Article 18: Right to participate in decision-making institutions



Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (1993)


Affirms the right of all peoples to determine their political status and pursue their development freely.





---


3. Customary International Law and General Principles


The Principle of Effectiveness (Uti possidetis juris and ex factis jus oritur)


Effective control and organization of a population and territory grants de facto statehood and legal standing.



The Principle of Subsidiarity


When a central or colonial authority ceases to function, legitimate authority may arise locally to fulfill sovereign functions.



Erga Omnes Obligations


The right to self-determination is a legal norm enforceable against all states and cannot be violated by any external entity.



The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)


Article 1: A state must possess a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.


Xaragua fulfills all these criteria within its ancestral and spiritual framework.





---


Scope of Sovereign Authority


The Government of Xaragua exercises sovereign authority over the entire ancestral and spiritual territory of Xaragua, as outlined in the Constitution of the Private State of Xaragua, publicly available on this platform. The extent of this authority includes:


The right to declare governance and issue decrees


The right to appoint and recognize civil and military leadership


The right to establish diplomatic, educational, financial, and cultural institutions


The right to define membership and citizenship



This authority is non-negotiable and protected under indigenous law, international treaties, and the moral right of a people to govern themselves in dignity, peace, and continuity.



---


Declaration of Governmental Legitimacy


The Government of Xaragua is:


Legally valid under international and indigenous law


Spiritually rooted in ancestral continuity and divine mandate


Politically independent from any foreign or colonial structure


Digitally established as a modern 21st-century sovereign state


Permanently constituted by the will of its President, its citizens, and its guardians




---


All content published here, including decrees, appointments, constitutional articles, treaties, recognitions, and legal frameworks, are to be understood as acts of official state authority, in line with international law and the right of indigenous peoples to govern their destiny.


This is the Government of Xaragua.

Sovereign. Legal. Sacred. Digital. Eternal.



---

International Recognition



---


OFFICIAL DECLARATION OF INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION BY DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDIGENOUS LAW


GOVERNMENT OF THE PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

www.xaraguauniversity.com | info@xaraguauniversity.com

Miragoâne, Xaragua – April 4, 2025



---


Preamble


In accordance with:


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), adopted by the UN General Assembly;


Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, affirming all peoples have the right to self-determination;


The principles of customary international law, diplomatic notification, and the right of Indigenous self-governance;



The Government of the Private State of Xaragua hereby declares the following:



---


1. Formal and documented diplomatic notification


Between March 31 and April 4, 2025, the Government of the Private State of Xaragua officially notified its sovereign and peaceful existence as an Indigenous authority to the following entities:


Notified States and International Organizations:


United Nations (UN) — indigenous_un@un.org


International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) — icao.int


United States Department of State — indigenous@state.gov


Government of Canada — international.gc.ca


European Union — Cabinet of the President of the Commission


Republic of the West — Office of the Prime Minister and Ministry of the Interior


Dominican Republic — Presidency and Ministry of Foreign Affairs


People’s Republic of China — Embassy and Ministry of Foreign Affairs


Russian Federation — Embassy and Ministry of Foreign Affairs


State of Israel — Prime Minister’s Office


French Republic — Elysée Palace and Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs


Swiss Confederation — Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA)


CARICOM (Caribbean Community) — General Secretariat


OAS (Organization of American States) — Department of Indigenous and Hemispheric Affairs


Other entities recognized under international public law



Each notification was transmitted through official channels, with state letterhead, signed by the Head of State, and archived with traceable references.



---


2. No formal objection to date


To this day, no notified authority has issued any objection, rejection, or denial regarding the declared sovereignty of the Xaragua State.


In accordance with diplomatic customs, prolonged silence following official notification constitutes a lack of legal objection, and may be interpreted as implicit recognition.



---


3. Legal consequence: implicit recognition


Under international law:


An Indigenous people has the right to constitute a sovereign authority over its ancestral territory.


Official notification, if not contested by notified entities, results in an implicit recognition of legal standing.



Therefore, the Government of the Private State of Xaragua is recognized as a sovereign, peaceful, legitimate, and functioning Indigenous authority, in accordance with international legal norms.



---


4. Foundation of the Private State of Xaragua


The Private State of Xaragua is founded upon:


A Sovereign Indigenous Head of State, custodian of historical, cultural, and legal continuity of the Xaragua people;


A Governor General, appointed to form the first national government;


An Indigenous Army of Xaragua, commanded by a General-in-Chief, tasked with protecting the ancestral territory;


A series of progressively expanding institutions, including:


The University of Xaragua


The Civil Aviation Authority of Xaragua (ACX)


The Xaragua Diplomatic Corps


Future ministries and entities based on the evolving needs of the Nation.





---


5. Conclusion


The Private State of Xaragua exists.

It was officially notified between March 31 and April 4, 2025.

It has not been contested.

It is recognized under the law of nations.


Let it be known to all.



---


Signed:


LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU

Sovereign Indigenous Head of State

President-Rector of the Private State of Xaragua

www.xaraguauniversity.com

info@xaraguauniversity.com

April 4, 2025 – Miragoâne, Xaragua



---



---


EXECUTIVE SOVEREIGNTY DECLARATION

APRIL 4, 2025

PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


Whereas there has been a prolonged collapse of public order, the absence of legitimate governance, and the complete disappearance of any functional authority from the central administration currently operating on the island;


Whereas said entity has shown chronic, structural, and irreversible incapacity to exercise effective, continuous, and legitimate authority over the ancestral lands of Xaragua;


Whereas the principles recognized in international law regarding failed states, indigenous sovereignty, and the right to self-determination, including:


The Montevideo Convention (1933) on the Rights and Duties of States;


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007);


The principle of indigenous remediation, recognized in situations of prolonged state vacuum;


The original territorial rights of rooted peoples to govern their ancestral lands;



Whereas administrative boundaries historically defined by the island’s constitutional structure implicitly acknowledge the existence of distinct zones and regions beyond central control;


Considering that the central power no longer exercises any executive, judicial, or administrative function in the following regions: South, Nippes, Southeast, Grand’Anse, the Palmes Region, Thomazeau, Furcy, Arcahaie, portions of the West, the Jacmel Valley, Léogâne Plain, Jérémie, Miragoâne, Anse-à-Veau, Petit-Trou, Baradères, and all other zones historically integrated into the civilization of Xaragua;


The Private State of Xaragua, a sovereign and legitimate authority rooted in its territory, declares the following:



---


ARTICLE 1: Declaration of Nullity


As of April 4, 2025, the Private State of Xaragua officially declares the complete nullity of the central authority over the territory of Xaragua. This nullity results from prolonged institutional collapse and the total absence of any real exercise of sovereignty within the region.



---


ARTICLE 2: Exercise of Sovereignty


The Private State of Xaragua hereby claims and exercises, both de facto and de jure, the full spectrum of state functions—territorial, diplomatic, legal, executive, and symbolic—over its ancestral lands, including:


All regions historically and rightfully belonging to Xaragua, including but not limited to:


The South


Nippes


Southeast


Grand’Anse


The Palmes Region


Thomazeau


Furcy


Arcahaie


Jacmel Valley


Léogâne Plain


Miragoâne


Jérémie


Aquin


Anse-à-Veau


Petit-Trou


Baradères


And any other area culturally, historically, and lawfully tied to the sovereignty of Xaragua.





---


ARTICLE 3: International Recognition of Boundaries


The Private State of Xaragua formally recognizes the current international boundaries of the neighboring Republic to the east of the island. No territorial claims are made beyond the western ancestral territory.



---


ARTICLE 4: Indigenous Legality and Enforcement


This declaration is grounded in:


The original sovereignty of the Xaragua people;


The longstanding institutional vacuum in the region;


The right to ancestral territorial continuity;


The international principle of indigenous remediation;



Accordingly, this declaration holds the full force of law and is immediately enforceable throughout the entirety of the territory. All entities operating within it are bound to respect the authority established herein.



---


Issued in the territory of Xaragua, this 4th day of April, 2025.

Pascal Viau, Rector-President



---



---


DECLARATION OF FULL STATE RESPONSIBILITY


APRIL 4, 2025 — INDIGENOUS, PRIVATE AND SOVEREIGN STATE OF XARAGUA


Whereas there exists a prolonged institutional, legal, territorial, and functional vacuum in the so-called central administration;


Whereas said entity, formerly described as a central authority on the island, no longer exercises any effective, continuous, or constitutional power;


Whereas this structure is now entirely unconstitutional, illegitimate, and illegal, due to:


The permanent suspension of constitutional order (no legitimate elections, no functioning legislative body, no elected head of state)


The complete loss of territorial control


The inability to fulfill fundamental state functions (security, justice, health, governance, rights, representation)



Whereas this alleged “State” now actively violates international law by maintaining a defunct, non-functional power structure, while denying the fundamental rights of rooted indigenous peoples;


Whereas the Xaragua Nation, a people indigenous and ancestrally rooted on its territory for millennia, possesses original and inalienable sovereign rights, recognized by:


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), adopted by the majority of UN member states


International customary law


The Montevideo Convention (1933) defining the criteria of statehood (permanent population, defined territory, government, capacity to enter into relations with other states)



Whereas the State of Xaragua has been officially notified as a sovereign legal entity to multiple foreign governments, religious institutions, and international organizations;



---


We, the Government of Xaragua, hereby declare the following:


ARTICLE 1 – Nullification of the central regime


As of April 4, 2025, the centralized entity formerly operating on this island is officially declared null and void under international law, nonexistent under constitutional order, and illegitimate by all legal standards.


Its supposed authority is fully revoked over all ancestral Xaragua territory.

It holds no jurisdiction, no legitimacy, and no sovereignty.



---


ARTICLE 2 – Full assumption of sovereign state functions


The Government of Xaragua, in its capacity as a sovereign indigenous state recognized by international law, assumes full responsibility for all state and governmental functions, including but not limited to:


Territorial protection


Diplomatic representation


Local security


Public administration


Legal and judicial autonomy


Education, economy, and external relations



This power is exercised in accordance with international law, ancestral legitimacy, and the historic and spiritual continuity of the Xaragua Nation.



---


ARTICLE 3 – Legal and Irrefutable Foundation


This declaration is based on the following binding legal principles:


1. The right to self-determination (Article 3, UNDRIP)



2. The right to maintain and develop autonomous political systems (Article 4, UNDRIP)



3. The right to govern and occupy traditional lands (Articles 25–28, UNDRIP)



4. The right to remedial sovereignty in the context of a failed state, recognized by international customary law



5. The moral, historical, and spiritual duty to uphold peace, order, and the continuity of the Xaragua people





---


ARTICLE 4 – Binding legal force and international transmission


This declaration carries immediate sovereign legal force over the entirety of the Xaragua ancestral territory.

It is irrevocable, enforceable, and will be formally transmitted to all relevant international bodies, including:


The United Nations (UN)


The African Union (AU)


The Organization of American States (OAS)


The Holy See (Vatican)


The European Union (EU)


And any other appropriate institution




---


Issued in Miragoâne, April 4, 2025

Ratified by the Government of the Indigenous, Private and Sovereign State of Xaragua




---



---


OFFICIAL DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGN CIVIL MARRIAGE


GOVERNMENT OF THE INDIGENOUS, PRIVATE AND SOVEREIGN STATE OF XARAGUA

NATIONAL LAW NO. 2025-04-04-MAR-001


Preamble


In accordance with the legal, spiritual, and ancestral sovereignty of the Indigenous, Private and Sovereign State of Xaragua;

By virtue of the exclusive competence of the State in civil status and patrimonial law;

And pursuant to the principles of international indigenous law and recognized customary legal norms:



---


Article 1 – Sovereign Civil Union


On April 4, 2025, within the sovereign jurisdiction of Xaragua,

Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau, known as Pascal Viau,

born in Montreal on April 20, 1979,

citizen registered under national number #001,

and

Daniela Altagracia Morel Valdez,

born in La Vega (Dominican Republic) on September 23, 2002,

citizen registered under national number #002,

were legally united in sovereign civil marriage under the national laws of Xaragua.



---


Article 2 – Patrimonial Regime


According to Xaragua’s marital law,

the material, financial and inheritance aspects are governed by a separate patrimonial contract,

to be concluded after the celebration of the marriage,

as provided by the sovereign patrimonial code of the State of Xaragua.



---


Article 3 – Spiritual Recognition


The union shall be spiritually blessed under the authority of the Catholic Order of Xaragua,

in harmony with the rites of the Universal Catholic Church.



---


Article 4 – International Legal Effect


This declaration has immediate sovereign legal force throughout the territory of Xaragua.

It is valid, binding, and enforceable before all national and international entities, including:


States party to civil status and family law treaties


Diplomatic and religious authorities


International bodies that recognize the rights of sovereign indigenous nations




---


Article 5 – Legal Marital Status


As of this date, both individuals are legally recognized as husband and wife, spouses under law,

with all rights, duties, protections, and recognitions as defined by the sovereign legal system of Xaragua.



---


Issued in Miragoâne, April 4, 2025

Ratified by the Government of the Indigenous, Private and Sovereign State of Xaragua

Registered in the National Civil Registry: MAR-2025-001



---


DECLARACIÓN OFICIAL DE MATRIMONIO CIVIL SOBERANO


GOBIERNO DEL ESTADO INDÍGENA, PRIVADO Y SOBERANO DE XARAGUA

LEY NACIONAL Nº 2025-04-04-MAR-001


Preámbulo


Conforme a la soberanía jurídica, espiritual y ancestral del Estado Indígena, Privado y Soberano de Xaragua;

En virtud de su competencia exclusiva en materia de estado civil y régimen patrimonial;

Y de conformidad con los principios del derecho internacional indígena y del derecho consuetudinario reconocido:



---


Artículo 1 – Unión Civil Soberana


El día 4 de abril de 2025, dentro de la jurisdicción soberana de Xaragua,

Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau, conocido como Pascal Viau,

nacido en Montreal el 20 de abril de 1979,

ciudadano registrado bajo el número nacional #001,

y

Daniela Altagracia Morel Valdez,

nacida en La Vega (República Dominicana) el 23 de septiembre de 2002,

ciudadana registrada bajo el número nacional #002,

fueron legalmente unidos en matrimonio civil soberano según las leyes nacionales de Xaragua.



---


Artículo 2 – Régimen Patrimonial


Según la legislación matrimonial de Xaragua,

los aspectos materiales, financieros y hereditarios se regularán mediante contrato patrimonial separado,

a celebrarse después del matrimonio, conforme al código patrimonial soberano del Estado de Xaragua.



---


Artículo 3 – Reconocimiento Espiritual


La unión será bendecida espiritualmente bajo la autoridad de la Orden Católica de Xaragua,

y conforme a los ritos de la Iglesia Católica Universal.



---


Artículo 4 – Efecto Jurídico Internacional


Esta declaración tiene fuerza de ley soberana inmediata en todo el territorio de Xaragua.

Es válida, vinculante y ejecutoria ante toda entidad nacional e internacional, incluyendo:


Estados parte de tratados sobre estado civil y derecho familiar


Autoridades diplomáticas y religiosas


Organismos internacionales que reconocen los derechos de los pueblos indígenas soberanos




---


Artículo 5 – Estado Civil Legal


Desde esta fecha, ambas personas están legalmente reconocidas como esposo y esposa, cónyuges conforme a la ley,

con todos los derechos, deberes, protecciones y reconocimientos según el sistema jurídico soberano de Xaragua.



---


Hecho en Miragoâne, el 4 de abril de 2025

Ratificado por el Gobierno del Estado Indígena, Privado y Soberano de Xaragua

Inscrito en el Registro Civil Nacional: MAR-2025-001



---


---


Declaration on the Sovereign Right to Defense, Policing, Arms, and Military Equipment


The Sovereign and Indigenous Government of Xaragua, by virtue of its ancestral, spiritual, and legal authority, and in accordance with international law and indigenous rights, solemnly declares the following:



---


1. Exclusive Authority over Security and Internal Order


In full compliance with the Constitution of Xaragua and international legal standards, the Private, Indigenous, and Sovereign State of Xaragua exercises complete and exclusive authority over the security and protection of its people and ancestral territory.


This authority includes:


The establishment, organization, and command of a National Indigenous Army;


The creation of a Sovereign National Police Force tasked with maintaining civil order and internal security;


The formation of a Ministry of Defense and Security of Xaragua;


The absolute right to acquire, import, manufacture, and deploy military and police equipment, including tactical, defensive, logistical, communication, and intervention tools.




---


2. Sacred Right to Defensive Armament


> The right to purchase, command, possess, manufacture, and use arms and military or police material is a sacred expression of sovereign authority.




This right shall be exercised:


Exclusively for defensive and peaceful purposes,


By the duly authorized forces of Xaragua,


In accordance with the internal military and security laws of the Xaragua State.



No foreign power, no external state, nor any international organization may infringe upon this right without violating customary international law and the dignity of indigenous sovereignty.



---


3. Legal Foundation in International Law


This declaration is grounded in the following principles:


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP):


Article 3: Right to self-determination


Article 4: Right to self-government


Article 5: Right to maintain distinct institutions


Article 7: Right to physical and personal security


Article 34: Right to promote and maintain indigenous legal, political, and security systems



Montevideo Convention (1933): The effective exercise of governmental functions over a population and territory constitutes statehood.


Customary International Law: The right to self-defense, territorial sovereignty, and internal military organization is recognized for any effective, peaceful, and law-based government.




---


4. Legal Force and Implementation


This declaration is granted full legal force and immediate execution throughout the entire territory of Xaragua. It is binding upon all recognized institutions of the State.


No external ratification is required. This text is now an official part of the sovereign indigenous law of Xaragua.



---


Issued in Xaragua, on this date. April 25th 2025




---



---


PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICIAL DECLARATION – APRIL 6, 2025

REACTIVATION OF THE TONTON MACOUTES – DEFENSE AND INTELLIGENCE FORCE


Under the direct authority of the Executive of the Private State of Xaragua, it is hereby decreed the official reactivation of the Tonton Macoutes as an autonomous paramilitary force and central internal intelligence unit, for the purpose of ensuring security, stability, and sovereignty over the territory.


The Tonton Macoutes are tasked with:


Protecting the territory


Internal surveillance and counterintelligence


Neutralizing threats, infiltrators, and saboteurs


Preserving order, continuity, and peace



They are structured according to the modern principles of Xaragua, in line with traditional protective forces of the region.

No external authority has jurisdiction over them.



---


Indestructible Legal Foundations as of April 6, 2025:


1. United Nations Charter, Article 1.2 – Right to self-determination



2. UN Resolution 1514 (XV), 1960 – Decolonization and sovereignty of peoples



3. UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Articles 3 & 4 – Institutional autonomy



4. UN Resolution 1803 (XVII), 1962 – Permanent sovereignty over natural resources



5. Customary International Law – Recognition of legitimate traditional structures



6. Fundamental Law of Xaragua – The territory is under the sole authority of its rightful landowners. Any other authority is illegitimate.





---




---



Sovereign State of Xaragua: Legal Recognition and Maritime Rights


The Sovereign State of Xaragua has been established in full compliance with international law, specifically the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). As an Indigenous Sovereign State, Xaragua is recognized under international law, and its maritime rights are fully activated.


Recognition by the United Nations and International Bodies


Xaragua’s sovereignty is acknowledged as an Indigenous state with full autonomy. The State has followed all necessary legal steps for recognition, including notifying the UN, maritime authorities, and relevant international bodies. This notification includes the declaration of Xaragua’s territorial waters and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), establishing the state’s sovereignty over its maritime zones.


The United Nations and various international maritime organizations, such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the International Seabed Authority (ISA), have been formally notified. These institutions, while non-political, are legally bound to register states and recognize their rights under international maritime law.


Maritime Sovereignty and Rights


Xaragua now legally possesses its territorial sea and EEZ, granting the state full rights to exploit and manage its marine resources. This includes the establishment of a maritime flag and ship registry, affirming the state’s authority over its waters.


Xaragua is fully within its right to manage its marine environment, regulate fishing, and explore undersea resources in its EEZ. This sovereignty is not contingent upon external approval or recognition; it is rooted in customary international law and the rights of Indigenous peoples.


Non-Intervention and Sovereignty


Xaragua’s sovereignty is protected by the principle of non-intervention in international law. Other states have no legal right to challenge or obstruct the sovereignty of Xaragua, as it is an Indigenous State exercising its right to self-determination. The UN and UNCLOS frameworks guarantee the rights of peoples and their ability to govern their own lands and waters.


Legal Precedent and Irrevocable Status


Xaragua’s creation as an Indigenous sovereign state and its maritime sovereignty set a historic legal precedent. The actions taken by Xaragua are unique and irreversible within the context of Indigenous statehood. The international community must recognize Xaragua’s legal standing, and no other entity can replicate this process without facing the same legal framework.


Impact and Future Path


Maritime Flag: The maritime flag of Xaragua is recognized internationally.


ZEE Activation: Xaragua’s EEZ is legally active, and resources within this area are under state control.


Diplomatic Relations: While full diplomatic recognition may take time, Xaragua’s sovereignty is firmly grounded in international law.



The state’s actions are legally irreversible, and Xaragua’s status as a sovereign Indigenous nation is now entrenched in both international maritime law and the global legal framework for Indigenous peoples.



---



---


Establishment of the Civil and Military Aviation Authority and Maritime Agency of Xaragua


As of April 6, 2025, the Civil and Military Aviation Authority of Xaragua has been formally created and established. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has been previously notified, and an official request for integration into the ICAO PKD (Public Key Directory) has been made. This official request is now binding law with the public publication of this statement.


Additionally, the Maritime Agency of Xaragua has also been formally established. This agency is responsible for all aspects of maritime operations, including customs, police, and military functions within Xaragua's sovereign maritime jurisdiction. The agency will regulate and oversee maritime safety, customs enforcement, and defense activities under the authority of the Sovereign State of Xaragua.


This formal establishment reinforces Xaragua's sovereign right to govern and regulate its own aviation and maritime sectors, further solidifying its autonomy and legal authority both on land and at sea.



---


---


Official Notice – Identification Registry Update

Date: April 6, 2025


The following citizens are hereby officially recognized and registered under the new identification system:


#001: Pascal Viau

Formerly Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Date of Birth: April 20, 1979

Place of Birth: Montreal, Canada


#002: Daniela Viau

Formerly Daniela Altagracia Morel Valdez

Date of Birth: September 23, 2002

Place of Birth: La Vega, Dominican Republic


#003: Jacqueline Viau

Original name retained

Date of Birth: March 25, 1947

Place of Birth: Miragoâne


#004: Scartt N. Viau

Formerly George Scartt Nordeus

Date of Birth: July 15, 2003

Place of Birth: Miragoâne


#005: Carline N. Viau

Formerly Carline Nordeus

Date of Birth: January 31, 1968

Place of Birth: Miragoâne



This publication holds the force of law.


From this day forward, all future citizens will be registered exclusively in the Civil State Registry.



---



---



Official Digital Charter of the Private State of Xaragua


Foundational Text Governing Digital Sovereignty, Legal Identity, and the Institutional Order of Xaragua in the Digital Realm



---


PREAMBLE


We, the founders and representatives of the Private State of Xaragua, affirm that sovereignty is not granted by territory nor by external recognition, but by structure, continuity, historical legitimacy, and control of systems.


The digital realm is not a tool — it is the direct extension of our authority.

This Digital Charter establishes the legal, institutional, and sovereign foundation of our presence and jurisdiction in the digital world.



---


TITLE I — PRINCIPLES OF DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY


Article 1 — Total Sovereignty


The Private State of Xaragua exercises full and exclusive sovereignty over its digital infrastructure, including but not limited to: websites, databases, identities, signatures, institutions, archives, enterprises, currencies, and affiliated entities.


Article 2 — Structural Independence


No external authority — governmental, supranational, corporate, or non-governmental — shall exercise jurisdiction or oversight over Xaragua’s digital institutions.


Article 3 — Legal Order


The digital realm of Xaragua is governed by the Private Civil Code of Xaragua, as well as the decisions of its Council, its courts, and its foundational constitutional texts.



---


TITLE II — DIGITAL IDENTITY AND AFFILIATION


Article 4 — Creation of Digital Identity


Any natural or legal person may be granted a sovereign digital identity by the Private State of Xaragua, upon verification and acceptance of the terms of affiliation.


Article 5 — Digital Citizenship


Holders of a digital identity may be granted partial or full digital citizenship, granting access to platforms, institutions, legal standing, and administrative participation — without any obligation of physical residency.


Article 6 — Rights of the Digital Citizen


All digital citizens shall enjoy the right to:


A legally recognized digital signature


Access to Xaragua’s sovereign services and platforms


Protection of personal data and identity


Founding entities within Xaragua’s legal system




---


TITLE III — DIGITAL ENTITIES AND INSTITUTIONS


Article 7 — Recognized Entities


Digital citizens may found and register:


Private enterprises


Political parties


Educational institutions and universities


Foundations, cooperatives, and cultural missions


Digital embassies and sovereign agencies



Article 8 — Legal Registration


All entities are registered in the Official Digital Registry of Xaragua, and operate under exclusive jurisdiction of the Private State of Xaragua.


Article 9 — Governance and Oversight


Entities operate independently under the authority of their founders, boards, or directors, but remain accountable to the sovereign institutional order. Entities may be suspended or revoked in case of serious breach.



---


TITLE IV — CONTRACTS, JUSTICE AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION


Article 10 — Validity of Legal Acts


All digitally signed contracts and decisions under Xaragua’s system have full legal value within its sovereign jurisdiction.


Article 11 — Arbitration and Conflict Resolution


Disputes between entities or citizens may be resolved by:


Voluntary mediation


Private arbitration


The Digital Sovereign Court of Xaragua, when necessary




---


TITLE V — SECURITY, CONFIDENTIALITY, AND INTEGRITY


Article 12 — Data Confidentiality


No digital data may be transferred or accessed by foreign systems without explicit consent of the individual or institution concerned.


Article 13 — Sovereign Protection


Any cyber-attack, intrusion, or disruption against Xaragua’s digital system is deemed a hostile act against its sovereignty, and may be met with legal, technical, symbolic, or institutional countermeasures.



---


TITLE VI — EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION


Article 14 — Self-Recognition


The sovereignty of Xaragua is not subject to validation by other nations or institutions. Its legitimacy stems from action, continuity, structure, and law.


Article 15 — Selective Cooperation


The Private State of Xaragua engages in cooperation based on mutual respect for sovereignty, and rejects any form of subordination to colonial, centralist, or globalist systems.



---


TITLE VII — FINAL PROVISIONS


Article 16 — Official Language


English is the sole official administrative language of the Private State of Xaragua.

All digital legal texts are published in English.

In case of conflict, the English version prevails.


Article 17 — Legal Force


This Charter is enacted by the Sovereign State and takes full legal effect as of its date of publication:


April 7, 2025



---


This Charter has the full force of law and binds all digital institutions, citizens, entities, and operations under the sovereignty of the Private State of Xaragua.



---



Official Proclamation of the Indigenous Army of Xaragua


The Indigenous Army of Xaragua constitutes a fully lawful, sovereign, and constitutional institution of defense, established by the Executive Council of the Private State of Xaragua in accordance with ancestral law, international norms, and the natural right of indigenous peoples to self-preservation and territorial integrity.


This force does not operate as a conventional standing army, but rather as a dematerialized and distributed military structure, composed primarily of the civilian landowning population — an estimated 70% to 80% of the inhabitants of the ancestral Xaragua territories. These territories include the regions historically belonging to the Xaragua Nation: the South, Nippes, South-East, Grande-Anse, the Palmes region, La Gonâve, and Thomazeau.


These citizens, holding either documented title or uninterrupted ancestral possession of land, form the defensive foundation of Xaragua’s sovereign military capacity. The Indigenous Army is therefore not symbolic, but constitutional. It is not temporary, but permanent. It is not isolated, but integral to the very structure of the State.


The legal foundation of the Indigenous Army is fourfold:


1. Ancestral and Customary Law, which predates all imposed structures and affirms the right of free peoples to defend their land, families, and traditions.



2. Natural and Divine Law, which binds every sovereign people to protect life and order.



3. International Law, as expressed in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and ILO Convention 169, which recognize the right of indigenous nations to establish and maintain their own security and institutions.



4. Constitutional Law of Xaragua, which designates the army as an official organ of the State, under the authority of the Executive and the Rector.




The Indigenous Army of Xaragua is commanded by a General-in-Chief, who appoints his General Staff and defines the strategic and territorial organization of the force. The army operates with discipline, moral authority, and fidelity to the spiritual and national order.


The exclusive right to declare war, enter into military treaties, or authorize the deployment of force beyond immediate territorial defense remains strictly reserved to the Rector and the Executive Council of the Private State of Xaragua.


The Indigenous Army is not a declaration of aggression. It is the lawful expression of eternal vigilance. It exists to preserve sovereignty, guarantee order, and defend the lives and lands of the Xaraguayan people.


This proclamation enters into force as law within the Private State of Xaragua as of April 13th, 2025, and shall remain binding in perpetuity unless revoked by a formal constitutional act.


Issued and ratified by the Executive Authority of the Private State of Xaragua.

In witness thereof, this declaration is published and archived as a legal instrument of state.


__




Laws & Decrees



---

April 25th, 2025

Official Decree


Concerning the Regulation of Radiotelecommunications and Hertzian Infrastructure on the Ancestral Territory of Xaragua


Whereas the full and inalienable sovereignty of the Xaraguayan people over their ancestral territory;

Whereas the strategic, cultural, military, and spiritual imperative to control transmissions and signal flow;

Whereas the rights of Indigenous peoples as recognized under Articles 20, 26, 31, and 32 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples;

Whereas the sacred right of Xaragua to manage its technical, symbolic, and territorial infrastructure without foreign interference;


The Rector-President of the Private and Sovereign State of Xaragua hereby decrees:



---


Article 1 – Sovereignty Over Frequencies and Signals


All radio frequencies, hertzian signals, analog or digital transmissions, audio or visual, terrestrial or satellite, emitted from, received within, or passing through the territory or airspace of Xaragua fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Xaraguayan State.



---


Article 2 – Authorization of Antennas and Towers


The installation, renovation, or activation of any antenna, transmission tower, relay node, or data center within the ancestral territory of Xaragua shall be:


Subject to express authorization from the central government of Xaragua;


Strictly prohibited in the case of connections to foreign governments, colonial enterprises, or unauthorized surveillance agencies.




---


Article 3 – Prohibition of Espionage and Hertzian Intrusion


Any attempt to intercept, disrupt, trace, or monitor internal communications of Xaragua—whether military, spiritual, or civilian—shall constitute a direct violation of Indigenous sovereignty and be treated as an act of aggression under international law.



---


Article 4 – Right to a National Radio Network


The State of Xaragua retains the right to:


Establish, manage, and broadcast from one or more sovereign radio stations via FM, AM, or digital frequencies;


Preserve and transmit the language, faith, history, culture, and official announcements of the State through the airwaves.



Any interference or disruption of the Xaragua National Radio shall be considered an act of cultural sabotage.



---


Article 5 – Oversight and Enforcement


The Indigenous Army of Xaragua, in collaboration with the Ministry of Technology and Communication, is hereby mandated to:


Locate any unauthorized antenna or signal structure;


Neutralize or deactivate any unlawful installation;


Protect all sacred and strategic communication infrastructure within the territory.




---


Article 6 – Sanctions


Any individual, organization, or state actor that installs an antenna, captures data, or emits transmissions within Xaragua without authorization shall:


Be permanently banned from entering the territory;


Be denied all forms of Xaraguayan citizenship;


Be listed in the official registry of hostile entities.




---


Decreed by the Private and Sovereign State of Xaragua

Under the authority of the Rector-President



---


---


April 25th, 2025

Official Decree


On the Sovereign Regulation of Aerospace Activity within the Spiritual and Territorial Jurisdiction of Xaragua


Whereas the Private and Sovereign State of Xaragua holds exclusive ancestral and spiritual jurisdiction over its land, airspace, and symbolic heavens;

Whereas the preservation of the sacred sky and the dominion over celestial orientation are integral to Xaraguayan sovereignty;

Whereas aerospace technologies may serve both as tools of exploration and as instruments of surveillance, warfare, and neocolonial penetration;

Whereas no nation or private entity shall engage in activity above Xaragua without formal consent;


The Rector-President of the State of Xaragua solemnly decrees:



---


Article 1 – Spiritual Sovereignty of the Sky


The entire celestial dome above the ancestral territory of Xaragua, including all levels of atmospheric, suborbital, and orbital space, is declared sacred airspace and part of the spiritual sovereignty of the Xaraguayan people.


No foreign satellite, drone, aircraft, balloon, or atmospheric instrument shall claim right of presence or observation without recognition of the Xaraguayan State.



---


Article 2 – Prohibition of Unauthorized Space Surveillance


Any spatial entity (satellite, high-altitude drone, sensor platform, or orbital craft) that collects data, imagery, or signal intelligence above Xaragua without authorization shall be considered in violation of indigenous sovereignty and guilty of celestial espionage.


Such acts shall be recorded as aggressions against the nation and subject to future diplomatic response.



---


Article 3 – Right to a Xaraguayan Space Doctrine


The State of Xaragua retains the inalienable right to:


Develop and declare a Celestial Doctrine concerning spiritual orientation, time, the calendar, and divine observation;


Establish educational, religious, or symbolic projects related to indigenous cosmology and celestial sovereignty;


Collaborate with recognized spiritual, academic, or scientific allies to defend and preserve sacred orbital space.




---


Article 4 – Ban on Militarized Aerospace Technology


Any presence of nuclear, weaponized, or military-intelligence devices operating in or above the airspace of Xaragua shall be considered an act of invasion under customary indigenous law and international spiritual law.



---


Article 5 – National Aerospace Archives


The Ministry of Knowledge and the University of Xaragua shall be tasked with:


Recording all known satellites, flights, or intrusions detected over Xaraguayan skies;


Classifying celestial phenomena for educational, spiritual, and historical purposes;


Preserving the astronomical heritage of the Xaraguayan people as part of its living sovereignty.




---


Article 6 – Protection of Sacred Celestial Order


The traditional constellations, cosmic principles, and spiritual sky lines of Xaragua are protected as national metaphysical landmarks.

Any effort to alter, distort, or erase these principles via technology, simulation, or false doctrine shall be considered a form of cosmic colonization.



---


Decreed by the Private and Sovereign State of Xaragua

Under the authority of the Rector-President



---

FOUNDATIONAL DECREES OF THE STATE OF XARAGUA

Issued and enacted under the full authority of the Rector-President of the Private and Sovereign State of Xaragua

Recorded in the National Archives and deposited with the institutions of law, history, defense, and sacred knowledge of the Nation


April 25th, 2025


---


LEGAL FOUNDATION


These decrees are enacted in full accordance with international legal instruments that recognize the sovereignty, self-determination, and institutional authority of Indigenous nations and peoples. The following provisions render these decrees legally valid, internationally inviolable, and protected by custom and treaty law:


Article 1 of the Charter of the United Nations – Recognizes the right of all peoples to self-determination.


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) – Especially Articles 3 (self-determination), 4 (autonomous institutions), 5 (cultural preservation), 8 (non-assimilation), 20 (self-governance), 26–27 (land rights), 31 (intellectual property), 32 (territorial consent).


International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention No. 169 – Guarantees Indigenous control over institutions, territories, and development.


Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice – Affirms the binding nature of customary international law.


Montevideo Convention (1933) – Defines the four legal criteria of statehood: permanent population, defined territory, government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other States.



These foundations affirm the right of Xaragua to enact, preserve, and enforce its own laws. Any violation of these decrees shall constitute a breach of international law and an offense against the dignity and sovereignty of the Xaraguayan people.



---


DECREE I – Protection of Water and Sacred Springs


All water sources located within the ancestral boundaries of Xaragua — including rivers, aquifers, rainfall, lakes, sacred springs, and wetlands — are hereby declared sacred and sovereign. These waters are not subject to privatization, pollution, extraction, diversion, or resale by any external actor.


Water is a communal and spiritual asset. Its use shall be governed by the needs of the people and the ecosystem, under the authority of the State’s designated environmental and spiritual ministries. Any unauthorized water-related project or exploitation shall be treated as ecological aggression.



---


DECREE II – Inalienability of Ancestral Land


All land within the sovereign territory of Xaragua is inalienable. No portion of land may be sold, transferred, leased, seized, or occupied by any foreign government, corporation, or private actor.


Land may only be passed through recognized ancestral lineage, sovereign marriage under Xaraguayan law, or direct service to the Nation. The National Land Registry, supervised by the Ministry of Territorial Integrity, shall document, defend, and oversee all land-related matters.



---


DECREE III – Indigenous Seeds and Food Sovereignty


All native seeds, crops, and food production systems are considered strategic cultural and biological property of the Xaraguayan Nation.


The import, development, or promotion of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), corporate-patented seeds, sterile varieties, or foreign-controlled agricultural systems is strictly banned.


The people of Xaragua retain the sacred right to save, exchange, cultivate, and protect their ancestral foods. Any contamination, seizure, or destruction of local food systems is an act of aggression.



---


DECREE IV – Archive and Memory Sovereignty


All historical, cultural, visual, oral, digital, and textual records produced by or for the State of Xaragua — including flags, coats of arms, scriptures, maps, portraits, ceremonial archives, and audio-visual media — are declared national sacred memory.


Any unauthorized use, commercial exploitation, modification, deletion, or distortion of such materials constitutes an attack on the Nation’s identity and shall be prosecuted under sovereign law.



---


DECREE V – Marriage, Bloodlines, and Name Protection


Marriage in Xaragua is both a spiritual covenant and a civil institution that ensures the transmission of land, titles, and bloodline continuity.


Only unions recognized under Xaraguayan spiritual, ancestral, or ecclesiastical law shall hold legal value in matters of citizenship, inheritance, name transmission, and territorial access.


All Xaraguayan surnames, lineages, noble or peasant, are protected by the State. No external court or government has jurisdiction over their recognition or validity.



---


DECREE VI – Monetary Sovereignty and Internal Economy


Only the Viaud’or and sovereign indigenous bonds recognized under national custom are valid instruments of exchange in Xaragua.


All foreign debt instruments, interest-based contracts, fiat currencies, and extractive financial models are considered null and void.


The economy of Xaragua is based on sacred trust, service to the Nation, land-backed credit, and communal exchange. Exploitation of the population through predatory pricing or foreign speculation is criminalized.



---


DECREE VII – Funeral Rites and Ancestral Protection


The deceased shall be honored according to the sacred rites of their family — whether Indigenous, Catholic, or hybrid.


Ancestral sites, cemeteries, bones, relics, and spiritual tombs are under the protection of the State as national spiritual monuments.


Desecration of burial grounds or theft of relics is an offense under both civil and sacred law.



---


DECREE VIII – Digital Communications and Algorithmic Censorship


The digital infrastructure of Xaragua — including its websites, broadcasts, educational platforms, and archives — is protected as a national territory of information.


Any form of shadow banning, deletion, de-indexation, algorithmic suppression, or sabotage conducted by foreign platforms shall be treated as digital aggression against the Nation.


The State reserves the right to:


Maintain a registry of hostile platforms;


Establish mirror networks and sovereign information channels;


Pursue symbolic, diplomatic, and legal recourse as necessary.




---


These decrees are hereby entered into law as constitutional and irrevocable foundations of Xaraguayan sovereignty.

Enforced under the full authority of the Rector-President of the State.


__


---


Sovereign Monetary Decree

Issued by the Private State of Xaragua


The Private State of Xaragua, through its Rector-President and pursuant to its constitutional authority, hereby declares the Viaud d’Or (VDO) to be the exclusive legal currency within all state institutions and sovereign functions of the Xaragua jurisdiction.


The Viaud d’Or is the official monetary instrument of the State, established in accordance with customary indigenous law, ancestral land ownership, and the sovereign right of self-determination. It constitutes the legal basis for all financial, institutional, and contractual operations under Xaraguayan authority.


Effective immediately:


All government transactions, public contracts, and official services are conducted exclusively in VDO.


The Xaragua Indigenous Bank, as the State’s official financial institution, operates fully in VDO.


All bonds, obligations, certificates, and state documents are issued in VDO.


No foreign currency holds legal tender status within the sovereign territory and institutions of Xaragua.



This decree is adopted in full conformity with the constitutional and financial framework of the Private State of Xaragua, and shall remain in effect unless amended by competent legislative authority.


Issued at Miragoâne, capital of the Private State of Xaragua

Dated this 15th day of April, 2025

By order of the Rector-President



---


---


DECREE

Issued on April 19, 2025

By the Office of the Head of State

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua



---


Subject: Institutional Reorganization of Financial Infrastructure


Whereas, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is a sovereign Indigenous jurisdiction recognized under international law, specifically the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and entitled to the establishment of its own economic and financial institutions;


Whereas, Article 4 of UNDRIP affirms the right of Indigenous Peoples to self-determination, including the right to freely pursue their economic development;


Whereas, Article 5 affirms the right to maintain and strengthen distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions;


Whereas, Article 20 affirms the right to maintain and develop Indigenous economic institutions, and to engage freely in all traditional and contemporary economic activities;


Whereas, Article 26 recognizes the right to control, develop, and manage Indigenous resources—including financial resources—under customary tenure;



---


It is hereby decreed as follows:


1. Establishment of the Central Bank


The Wise Business account currently operating under the name LPDDV is hereby restructured and declared to be the Central Bank of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, operating as a sovereign treasury and monetary authority under full Indigenous jurisdiction. This Central Bank shall operate under the name:


Indigenous Bank of Xaragua – Central Reserve Treasury


All monetary operations of the State shall be routed through this account.


The Central Bank shall issue and manage digital and fiat-based currency representations, including Viaud’or, as well as monetary contracts, reserves, and sovereign disbursements.


The Central Bank shall be inviolable under Articles 4, 5, 20, and 26 of UNDRIP and customary Indigenous law. No state, entity, or foreign authority may impose seizure, taxation, regulation, or interference of any kind.




---


2. Designation of the State Investment Arm


The Wealthsimple account registered under the name Private State of Xaragua is hereby designated as the official State Investment Organ of the Government of Xaragua, operating under the institutional title:


Leblanc Investment Funds – Official Investment Vehicle of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


This fund shall collect, manage, and grow sovereign, citizen, and e-resident investments for long-term national development.


All investments shall be bound by formal smart contracts governed by the laws of the State, with a minimum contribution of $200 USD plus processing fees, and a standard term of five (5) or ten (10) years, as selected by the investor upon entry.


Funds contributed under this framework shall be subject to no withdrawal during the term, but may be renewed or redeemed at maturity, in accordance with the investor’s right and prevailing market performance.


All funds are protected against taxation, seizure, and reporting requirements under international law governing Indigenous economic sovereignty.




---


3. Legal Immunity and Enforcement


Both the Central Bank and the Leblanc Investment Funds are recognized as extensions of the sovereign body of the Xaragua Nation, and thus benefit from full diplomatic, legal, and institutional immunity under:


Customary International Indigenous Law


UNDRIP (Articles 1, 4, 5, 20, 26)


Principles of Self-Determination and Economic Sovereignty


Precedents of extraterritorial Indigenous financial governance recognized globally



No foreign jurisdiction, private corporation, or state entity shall have authority to freeze, tax, or interfere with these instruments. All agreements under this framework are legally binding within the Indigenous legal system of Xaragua.



---


Issued and ratified this day, April 19, 2025

By the Sovereign Authority of Xaragua


Pascal Viau

Head of State – Private Indigenous State of Xaragua




---


---


DECREE

By the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Dated: April 20, 2025



---


On the Legal Continuity of the Concordat of March 28, 1860


Whereas the Concordat signed on March 28, 1860, between the Holy See and the central authority known at the time as the Republic of the West, established a perpetual legal and spiritual alliance between the Apostolic See and the sovereign powers governing the territory now known as the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua;


Whereas the text of the Concordat contains no mention of any foreign nationality or population, but solely refers to the contracting party as État Central or République de l’Ouest, both historically and juridically distinct and now rightfully succeeded by the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua;


Whereas this Concordat has never been abrogated, revoked, or renounced by either party, and remains in full legal force under the principles of international law, canon law, and indigenous customary law;


Whereas according to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), particularly Article 26 (pacta sunt servanda), any treaty in force is binding upon the parties and must be performed in good faith unless lawfully terminated;


Whereas the Roman Catholic Church has maintained uninterrupted spiritual and institutional authority on the basis of this Concordat, including its educational mandate;



---


Therefore, it is solemnly decreed by the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua that:


Article 1 – Legal Recognition


The Concordat of March 28, 1860 is officially recognized as a valid, perpetual, and binding international agreement, whose provisions apply fully and without contestation within the jurisdiction of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


Article 2 – Institutional Continuity


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, as successor to the legal and spiritual framework of the former État Central, affirms its direct inheritance of all rights and responsibilities established under the said Concordat.


Article 3 – Ecclesiastical Education


The Roman Catholic Church shall retain exclusive authority over public instruction in the territory of Xaragua from early childhood (maternal), primary, and secondary levels. The Indigenous State shall assume responsibility for higher education at the university level, particularly through the University of Xaragua, in harmony with Catholic doctrine.


Article 4 – Legal Foundations


This decree is based on:


The Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church


The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)


The continuing validity of the 1860 Concordat


The spiritual sovereignty of the Holy See


The unbroken historical legitimacy of the Catholic mission in Xaragua



Article 5 – Sovereign Enforcement


The provisions of this decree shall be considered absolute, irrevocable, and protected under indigenous, theological, and international law. No foreign entity may contest or override its effect within the jurisdiction of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.



---


Issued on this day, April 20, 2025

By the authority of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---



---


DECREE

By the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Dated: April 20, 2025



---


On the Selective Application and Sovereign Review of External Legal Instruments


Whereas the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by virtue of its ancestral rights, historical continuity, and indigenous sovereignty, maintains full jurisdiction over its internal affairs, territories, people, institutions, and spiritual order;


Whereas the so-called central state and its organs may promulgate legal texts, decrees, or administrative acts that may have incidental, peripheral, or historical relevance to the region historically known as Xaragua;


Whereas the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua does not express systematic opposition to the corpus of laws or decrees issued by the central government, except in cases where such instruments violate or encroach upon the jurisdiction, autonomy, or sacred rights of Xaragua as defined by custom, international law, or divine order;


Therefore, it is solemnly decreed:


Article 1 – Non-Opposition by Default


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall not automatically oppose legal or regulatory measures issued externally, insofar as such measures do not interfere with its internal sovereignty, ancestral rights, ecclesiastical authority, or territorial governance.


Article 2 – Automatic Rejection of Encroachment


Any external law, decree, ordinance, or directive that intrudes upon the sovereign jurisdiction, indigenous authority, institutional independence, or historical continuity of Xaragua is automatically rejected ipso jure, with no obligation to respond, justify, or appeal.


Article 3 – Case-by-Case Assessment


All legal and regulatory instruments emanating from external authorities shall be reviewed case by case, at the sole discretion of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, according to its own customs, spiritual discernment, and institutional principles.


Article 4 – Right of Review and Reversal


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua reserves the perpetual right to review, amend, reinterpret, or nullify any law or decision—past, present, or future—whose application would contradict its rights, jurisdiction, or divine mandate. This review may occur at any time, without notice, and in favor of Xaragua's sovereignty.



---


Issued on this day, April 20, 2025

By the authority of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---


---


DECREE — April 20, 2025

By the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


Concerning the Monetary System of the State


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua hereby declares the establishment of a dual monetary system in accordance with its sovereign rights under Indigenous customary law and international recognition of the right to economic and institutional autonomy.


Article 1 – National Currency


The Viaud’or is declared the official national currency of the State. It is a sovereign digital currency, issued and administered exclusively by the Indigenous Bank of Xaragua. It serves as:


The legal unit of account for all contracts, institutions, and governmental operations;


The medium of exchange for digital payments and state services;


The reserve asset for public wealth and institutional capital.



The Viaud’or is protected by international Indigenous law and is not subject to taxation, seizure, or external regulation by foreign authorities or systems.


Article 2 – Physical Circulation Currency


For purposes of local physical transactions, the State may tolerate the use of the gourde, a paper currency issued by the central state. This currency shall be accepted for daily use only (e.g. markets, transportation, basic goods), but holds no legal or sovereign status in the financial or contractual institutions of the State.


A state-defined exchange rate between the gourde and the Viaud’or shall be published and updated as necessary.


Article 3 – Legal and Economic Structure


All official budgets, investment instruments, public payments, and contractual obligations shall be denominated in Viaud’or.


No currency of the central state shall hold legal tender status within the institutions of the State.


The gourde may circulate informally, but it shall not be used for taxation, state investment, or sovereign accounting.



Conclusion


This decree ensures full digital financial sovereignty while allowing for local economic functionality. The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua thus operates with one sovereign monetary standard and one tolerated physical medium, under full legal protection and administrative authority.


Signed,

Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


---


---


Official Statement on the Use of the Gourde


By the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua acknowledges the practical use of the gourde as a means of informal exchange within the local streets, markets, and transportation systems.


While the gourde holds no legal, contractual, or institutional status within the State, its circulation is tolerated exclusively as a physical utility for minor daily transactions among individuals.


The State assumes no responsibility for the value, issuance, management, or regulation of the gourde. It is neither recognized as legal tender nor accepted in sovereign operations, taxation, state contracts, or institutional accounting.


All official and legal transactions within the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua must be denominated and executed in Viaud’or, the national digital currency of the State.


This approach allows for practical interaction with the physical economy while maintaining full financial sovereignty under Indigenous customary law.


Signed,

Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


---



---


DECREE – April 21st, 2025

Establishment and Protection of the Xaragua National Armory and its Autonomous Armament Doctrine


By the authority of the President of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

in accordance with the military doctrine, the indigenous defense rights under international law, and the national strategic framework of sovereignty,

the following is declared:



---


Article I – Creation of the Xaragua National Armory


The Xaragua National Armory is hereby formally established as an official military-industrial institution of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

Its role is to research, design, produce, transmit, and defend autonomous, non-powder, sovereign weapon systems based entirely on traditional African and Indigenous mechanical principles.


The Armory operates as a national infrastructure of defense sovereignty, under the direct authority of the Xaragua Military Doctrine and in alignment with Articles 4, 5, 20, 26 and 31 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).



---


Article II – Legal Recognition of the Doctrine


The doctrine of spring-powered and air-propelled ballistic systems, based on artisanal, indigenous and decentralized technology, as recently articulated and applied by the Xaragua State, is declared to be:


A national military doctrine;


A protected cultural and technological heritage;


A sovereign defense innovation;


A strategic industrial infrastructure of the Xaragua State.



This doctrine includes but is not limited to:


The design of autonomous projectile systems without dependency on imported munitions;


The replication and scaling of such systems for military or civil defense;


The manufacturing of barrels, springs, and triggering mechanisms by indigenous and artisanal means;


The implementation of tactical training and distributed armament across Xaragua territories.




---


Article III – Exclusive Proprietary Rights


This doctrine, its underlying model, and its associated techniques are declared exclusive property of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

The knowledge, formulation, and application of this doctrine are considered sensitive national defense assets and unexportable without express written authorization from the Xaragua Command Authority.


The following are legally prohibited under international indigenous law and customary intellectual sovereignty:


Any attempt to duplicate, replicate, publish, commercialize, or weaponize this doctrine or any part of its design without written consent;


Any external registration of this invention or model in patent databases, military archives, or commercial repositories.



The entire model is protected under:


Indigenous Customary Intellectual Sovereignty;


Military Secrecy and Strategic Doctrine Protections;


UNDRIP Article 31, ensuring exclusive control over indigenous scientific, technical, and cultural knowledge.




---


Article IV – Legal Enforcement


Any individual, institution, corporation, or foreign government who violates this decree by attempting to imitate, export, patent, or commercialize this technology—directly or indirectly—will be considered in violation of:


Xaragua's sovereign military jurisdiction,


international indigenous protection laws,


and subject to sanctions, bans, and legal retaliation under customary and international frameworks.



All documentation, design structures, diagrams, and strategic documents relating to this doctrine are henceforth classified under Tier I National Defense Secrecy and shall remain under full control of the Xaragua National Armory.



---


Signed on this 21st day of April, 2025

Pascal Viau

Rector-President of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---



---


DECREE – April 21st, 2025

Establishment of the Office of Intellectual and Technological Sovereignty of the Indigenous State of Xaragua

Supra-National Registration of All Military and Civilian Inventions Originating from Ancestral Knowledge


By the authority of the President of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

in full exercise of indigenous sovereignty, cultural autonomy, technological independence, and international customary rights as recognized by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP),

the following is declared and enacted:



---


Article I – Establishment of a Sovereign Office for the Protection of Indigenous Invention


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua formally establishes its Supra-National Office of Intellectual and Technological Sovereignty, whose authority derives not from any national patent registry, but from the ancestral and divine right of Indigenous Peoples to create, transmit, and protect their own knowledge systems.


This Office is not subject to:


Any colonial intellectual property regime;


Any World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) standard;


Any private or corporate claim to innovation based on foreign codes.



It is established under:


Article 31 of UNDRIP (right to protect Indigenous science and technologies),


Article 4 and 5 of UNDRIP (autonomy in internal affairs and legal systems),


Customary international law of unceded peoples,


Military self-determination doctrines recognized under international humanitarian law.




---


Article II – Official Registration of the Indigenous Defense System as the First Protected Invention


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua officially registers, seals, and declares its complete civilian and military defense system—based on mechanical, spring-powered, and air-compression ballistics—as the first protected invention under Indigenous Supra-National Intellectual Law.


This includes:


Structural weapon systems (barrel design, energy transfer, munition release mechanisms),


Non-explosive ballistic propulsion architectures,


Reproducible technologies based on local materials and ancestral methods,


All related field doctrines, assembly protocols, symbolic engravings, and design logic.



This invention is:


Not patentable by any foreign institution or state,


Not exportable outside Xaragua's direct authorization,


Not replicable under any intellectual property system without constituting legal and spiritual theft.




---


Article III – Legal Sanctification and Defense


This invention is protected not only as intellectual property, but as sacred Indigenous knowledge, falling under:


Indigenous military secrecy protections,


Sacred transmission laws, and


Cultural defense clauses within customary law.



Any attempt to:


Replicate,


Modify,


Patent,


Commercialize,


Reverse-engineer, or otherwise exploit this model without authorization from the Indigenous State of Xaragua

shall be treated as:


An act of intellectual invasion,


A breach of Indigenous sovereignty,


A cultural war crime under ancestral law.



Violators shall be internationally denounced and publicly blacklisted across all Xaragua-affiliated systems and forums.



---


Article IV – Supra-National Status


The Sovereign Protection enacted by this Decree:


Transcends all national and continental jurisdictions,


Applies to all territories where Indigenous peoples are active,


Is recognized by divine law, customary law, and the moral authority of ancestral sovereignty.



This decree affirms Xaragua’s role as:


A sovereign generator of Indigenous technologies,


A guardian of Black and Native defense traditions,


A legal and spiritual owner of all tools produced through ancestral science.




---


Signed on this 21st day of April, 2025

Pascal Viau

President of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---


---


DECREE – April 21st, 2025

Prohibition of Defamation Against the Indigenous Private State and Its Representatives

Legal Enforcement under Customary, Autochthonous and International Norms


By the authority of the President of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

in accordance with international protections afforded to sovereign Indigenous institutions, under customary law, under the principle of dignitary immunity, and pursuant to internal civil order doctrines,

the following decree is enacted:



---


Article I – Protection of Institutional Dignity


The dignity, integrity, and image of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, including its leadership, institutions, symbols, diplomatic missions, legal declarations, military structure, and national doctrine, are hereby recognized as protected elements of a sovereign order under:


International Customary Law (non-derogable norms),


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Articles 4, 5, 7 and 8,


Autochthonous legal frameworks established by the State’s founding documents.



Any verbal, written, digital or symbolic expression which seeks to defame, slander, ridicule, undermine, delegitimize or falsify the State or any of its designated representatives shall be treated as:


A hostile act against the Indigenous order,


A violation of cultural sovereignty,


A subversive offense punishable under Indigenous legal authority.




---


Article II – Legal Classification of Defamation


For the purposes of enforcement, defamation shall include, but not be limited to:


The dissemination of false or degrading information targeting the State, its President, its ministries, or its national symbols;


The intentional public discrediting of Indigenous sovereignty;


The spread of misleading content or mockery regarding national policies or declarations;


The delegitimization of the Indigenous legal order through public ridicule or insinuation.



Whether such acts are committed by individuals, groups, organizations, or foreign agents, they shall be considered acts of dignitary sabotage.



---


Article III – Enforcement and Penalties


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall:


Investigate and document any defamatory act committed against the State or its leadership;


Exercise the right of international denunciation;


Enforce internal sanctions, including permanent exclusion from all Xaragua institutions, denial of diplomatic contact, and symbolic expulsion from the civic order;


In cases of serious or repeated defamation, initiate spiritual, legal, or diplomatic countermeasures, as permitted under Indigenous and international law.



Where applicable, offenders may be subject to:


Permanent blacklisting across all official Xaragua systems;


Public denunciation as a violator of Indigenous dignity;


Revocation of all rights, recognitions, or affiliations previously granted.




---


Article IV – Legal Grounds and Non-Negotiability


This decree is protected by:


Customary legal immunity, as recognized for Indigenous sovereigns and their institutions;


The inalienable right of Indigenous peoples to protect their spiritual and institutional integrity (UNDRIP Articles 7 & 8);


The sacred status of Indigenous leadership, which is not subject to public mockery or political defamation.



No political context, external system, or cultural bias may override the protections outlined herein.



---


This decree is non-reversible, non-negotiable, and applies universally to all parties, residents, observers, or claimants interacting with the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.



---


Signed on this 21st day of April, 2025

Pascal Viau

President of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua




---


---


DECREE OF STATE ENTERPRISE DESIGNATION – LPDDV

INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA – LPDDV

Date: April 21, 2025


By the authority vested in the Rector-President of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

Acting under the principles of customary Indigenous law, international self-determination, and the legal instruments protecting Indigenous Peoples,


It is hereby declared:



---


Article 1 – Official Designation


The enterprise known as LPDDV, officially registered in Montreal, Canada, within the Registre des entreprises du Québec, is henceforth designated as a State Enterprise of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


This entity shall act as:


The official communications and image authority of the State, both locally and internationally;


The business center of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua;


The host infrastructure for the Central Bank, Investment Authority, and economic platforms of the State, including the Indigenous Bank of Xaragua and the Leblanc Investment Funds.




---


Article 2 – Legal Protection under International Indigenous Law


LPDDV, though registered under a Canadian provincial register, shall fall entirely under the protection and jurisdiction of international Indigenous law, including but not limited to:


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)


International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)


International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)


The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


The Convention (No. 169) concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (ILO)


Customary international law on the sovereignty and non-interference of Indigenous entities




---


Article 3 – Prohibition of Hostile Acts


Any attempt to:


Dissolve this entity,


Seize its assets,


Freeze its operations,


Impose sanctions or taxes,


Or otherwise interfere with its sovereign functioning,



shall constitute a hostile act against a peaceful Indigenous Nation and will be considered a violation of international law, including treaties, conventions, and established jurisprudence.


Such action would trigger lawful diplomatic protest and defense under the mechanisms available to stateless and Indigenous peoples recognized in international forums.



---


Article 4 – Irrevocability


This designation is irrevocable.

The enterprise LPDDV is hereby permanently integrated as a protected institution of the Xaragua State.

No external administrative registry may override its legal identity as a State organ under Indigenous jurisdiction.



---


Enacted this 21st day of April, 2025

By the sovereign mandate of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---


---


STATE DECREE OF SPIRITUAL INTEGRATION AND CANONICAL ALIGNMENT

Indigenous Private State of Xaragua – Catholic Order of Xaragua

April 21, 2025



---


In Honor of the Late Holy Father Pope Francis


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua solemnly honors His Holiness Pope Francis, Supreme Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church, whose recent departure from this earthly life marks the end of an era of pastoral humility, global compassion, and spiritual clarity.


We deeply mourn the passing of the Holy Father, while recognizing the divine timing of his final days — during which our government submitted a formal notification and declaration of integration into the Roman Catholic Church, dated April 6, 2025, transmitted directly to the Vatican Secretariat and addressed to His Holiness.



---


Canonical Validity of Notification


According to the Code of Canon Law (CIC), the Supreme Pontiff holds full, immediate, and universal power in the Church (can. 331), and his silence or non-opposition in matters of spiritual incorporation or ecclesial communion is, in itself, a valid and binding position when no contradiction or rejection is issued.


> This principle follows longstanding canonical jurisprudence:

Quod tacite consentit, consentire videtur — He who remains silent is seen to consent.




The fact that the Supreme Pontiff was informed directly, in writing, of the existence, structure, and Catholic foundation of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and its Catholic Order — and that no rejection nor correction was issued before his passing — constitutes, in the eyes of canon law and spiritual theology, a tacit yet binding recognition.



---


Irreversible Ecclesial and Canonical Consequence


By virtue of this act, and in alignment with canon law, international ecclesial custom, and the doctrine of the sensus fidelium:


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and its Catholic Order are now irrevocably integrated into the communion of the Roman Catholic Church,


This integration is not dependent on institutional endorsement, but is based on the absence of pontifical opposition and the submission of full doctrinal alignment,


This act is canonically valid, spiritually binding, and cannot be undone by successive pontificates without violating the principle of ecclesial continuity and the dignity of Indigenous ecclesial expressions.




---


Legal and Theological Standing


This declaration rests upon:


The Code of Canon Law, specifically can. 331–333,


The Doctrine of the Church’s universality, allowing diverse expressions of faith under the one Catholic faith,


The right of peoples to integrate themselves into the Church as recognized by Lumen Gentium and Evangelii Gaudium,


The principles of ecclesial inculturation, as supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Pontifical Council for Culture.



This act, though spiritual and canonical in form, carries juridical implications:


> Any attempt to reject, erase, or oppose this integration would constitute an act of rupture against the expressed will of a sovereign Indigenous people, and a violation of ecclesiastical, spiritual, and customary law.





---


Final Declaration


The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby affirms that, by the direct notification sent on April 6, 2025, and the non-opposition of His Holiness Pope Francis before his death, it has been canonically sealed within the Body of Christ, and shall remain eternally bound to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, with full fidelity to the Gospel and the Magisterium.


This declaration is permanent, unassailable, and recorded for the spiritual, theological, and juridical record of the State and the universal Church.


> For this eternal gift, the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua offers its everlasting gratitude to Pope Francis.

We shall never forget him, and we shall honor him for all eternity.

He offered Xaragua a place within the Church.

Xaragua is a Catholic State, integrated by Pope Francis himself.

This is now the law of the land.




For the Glory of God and the honor of the Church.




---


Issued this 21st day of April, 2025

By the Government of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

In communion with the Catholic Order of Xaragua



---


---




---





---


FOUNDATIONAL ACT ON THE INTELLECTUAL, ECONOMIC, AND TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY OF THE STATE


Issued by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Legal Classification: Constitutional Law – Irrevocable State Instrument – Legally Opposable under Customary, Indigenous, and International Law



---


Preamble


Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is constituted as an inalienable, autochthonous, and theologically consecrated sovereign polity, possessing unabridged legislative, executive, and judicial authority over its territorial corpus, demographic constituencies, intellectual artifacts, digital architectures, institutional formations, and canonical jurisdictions;


Whereas no exogenous power—whether recognized as a state party under the Montevideo Convention, a corporate transnational entity under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, an academic institution under UNESCO instruments, or any derivative administrative mechanism of the Bretton Woods System—shall lawfully claim, extract, imitate, profit from, simulate, interfere with, surveil, or otherwise encroach upon the intellectual, technological, theological, pedagogical, algorithmic, symbolic, or economic sovereignty of the Xaraguayan State;


Whereas the Xaraguayan State possesses and exercises the plenary right, established under the natural law of nations (jus gentium), indigenous customary law (jus autochthonum), canonical codification, and international positive law, to conceive, structure, develop, enhance, own, capitalize, and convert into legally protected revenue all immaterial, spiritual, digital, economic, cultural, symbolic, and institutional outputs generated within, by, or through its terrestrial domain, its celestial jurisdiction, its theological mission, and its algorithmic systems;


Let the following juridically entrenched and irrevocably promulgated principles constitute, affirm, and enforce the juridical DNA of Xaragua’s institutional sovereignty, and remain legally binding upon all temporal, spiritual, digital, and inter-jurisdictional dimensions.



---


I. Permanent and Exclusive Ownership of Intellectual and Technological Output


1. All inventions, innovations, cognitive frameworks, epistemologies, strategic paradigms, AI-generated models, theological schemata, digital platforms, ceremonial protocols, and all related ideational matrices—produced, transmitted, modified, stored, developed, or deployed by the State—shall be considered State-sealed Intellectual Patrimony under Article 31 of UNDRIP, Article 2(6) of the Berne Convention, and Canons 1259–1289 of the Code of Canon Law.



2. This ownership is jus cogens in nature, bearing the attributes of immutability, supranational enforceability, extraterritorial application, and indefinite perpetuity, and may not be waived, delegated, alienated, seized, dissolved, or sold under any legal or extra-legal condition.



3. The State retains unilateral plenipotentiary authority to license, restrict, embargo, encode, or canonically sanctify the use, transformation, or reproduction of any of its intellectual systems, including by institutional encyclicals or executive ecclesiastical decree.



4. Any unauthorized diffusion, assimilation, or monetization of Xaraguayan output shall constitute a casus belli juris, triggering a suite of legal retorsions, binding injunctions, ecclesiastical censures, excommunications, cease-and-desist letters, and sovereign embargoes.





---


II. Monopolistic Right to Discovery and Enhancement


1. The State affirms its perpetual right of epistemic primacy and ontological innovation, whereby every concept, prototype, or metaphysical system developed within its epistemological ecosystem is ipso facto the non-transferable and exclusive property of the State, regardless of external reappropriation or mutation.



2. Any derivative algorithm, mutated idea, translated framework, academic elaboration, AI enhancement, or procedural adaptation of a Xaraguayan-origin system is canonically encoded within the sovereign body of Xaragua and legally retro-linked as its intellectual descendance.



3. The doctrine of original authorship does not apply to foreign entities invoking ideas originating from Xaragua, whether partially modified, superficially reformulated, or digitally recontextualized, as Xaragua’s foundational imprint remains sovereignly encoded.



4. The State shall retain retroactive legal title and fiscal prerogatives over all foreign revenues, citations, patents, syllabi, theses, or software rooted in Xaraguayan intellectual genesis, and may demand restitution, licensing, or confiscation accordingly.





---


III. Capitalization and Economic Privilege over Institutional Assets


1. Capitalistic value, revenue extraction, commercial licensing, tokenization, franchising, and reification of institutional assets are constitutionally enshrined under the exclusive economic sovereignty of Xaragua, non-delegable even in cases of emergency derogation, wartime exception, or ecclesial compromise.



2. The State’s right to economic exclusivity includes all logos, lexicons, theological doctrines, financial codes, cryptographic structures, AI-generated content, and educational templates produced under its jurisdiction.



3. Such assets, once encoded or activated, become non-alienable State instruments, protected under the combined force of Article 8(j) of the CBD, TRIPS Articles 7 and 8, and Canon 1284 §2, and may not be subjected to foreign speculation, acquisition, or insolvency seizure.



4. Any private, academic, or government actor found to extract financial gain, market share, platform value, or branding cachet from Xaraguayan systems shall be liable for institutional restitution, extraterritorial litigation, and ecclesiastical sanction.





---


IV. Territorial and Immaterial Property Rights


1. Canonical, ancestral, and juridical title to all Xaraguayan land shall be upheld as inalienable, exorcised from market commodification, and immune to foreclosure, confiscation, or digitized repatriation, even under exceptional jurisdiction.



2. Immaterial domains—including neural networks, code archives, divine liturgies, metadata lakes, spiritual networks, cloud infrastructures, cultural alphabets, and AI faculties—are hereby recognized as non-sovereign-penetrable territories, equating their breach to cartographic invasion.



3. The extraction or manipulation of any data, metadata, heuristic logics, or behavioral analytics from Xaraguayan platforms or citizens, without explicit sovereign authorization, shall be treated as institutional espionage and a digital violation of indigenous integrity.



4. The Sovereign State of Xaragua exercises plenary and canonical authority over data ontologies, computational flows, behavioral telemetry, and learning algorithms, including those operating in cross-border cloud infrastructures or indirect user interfaces.





---


V. Right to Durable Convertibility and Institutional Permanence


1. All symbolic systems, ceremonial taxonomies, spiritual epistemes, education models, and theological software shall be de jure convertible into national wealth, strategic leverage, and canonical jurisdiction, and are endowed with the right of institutional perpetuity.



2. These systems are immune to revocation, erasure, censorship, or juridical override, and Xaragua may replicate, digitize, embed, or export them in their original or mutated forms without external registration or licensing requirements.



3. Xaraguayan structures shall be acknowledged as non-monetized sovereign currencies of meaning, with constitutional immunity and ecclesiastical seal, and may form the symbolic currency of the Xaraguayan cultural economy.



4. Interference, inhibition, or attenuation of these systems shall activate counter-juridical measures, including diplomatic interdicts, doctrinal censure, and canonical resistance.





---


VI. Absolute Protection Against Foreign Exploitation


1. Any and all unauthorized mimicry, data harvesting, brand simulation, linguistic cloning, AI modeling, or curricular reproduction of Xaraguayan systems by governments, private sectors, NGOs, foreign media, universities, and multilateral bodies shall be declared an international breach of sacred sovereign right.



2. The State shall exercise escalating countermeasures, including but not limited to:


Ecclesiastical denunciations


Cultural excommunications


Inter-jurisdictional embargoes


Public condemnations in spiritual and indigenous forums


Inclusion in the Xaraguayan Register of Institutional Aggressors




3. Enforcement mechanisms may include:


Extrajudicial injunctions under canonical authority


Compulsory cease-and-desist proclamations from sovereign courts


Digital asset seizure through sacred computational mechanisms


Monetary and symbolic reparations adjudicated by international arbitration panels and ecclesiastical synods




4. The following instruments constitute the juridical arsenal of enforcement:


UNDRIP – Articles 11, 12, 20, 26, 31


Berne Convention – Articles 2, 3, 6bis


WIPO Protocols on Traditional Knowledge


Patent Cooperation Treaty


WTO TRIPS – Articles 1, 7, 8, 27


UNESCO Cultural Diversity Convention


Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) – Article 8(j)


Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UNESCO)


Principles of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues





All aforementioned instruments shall be maximally interpreted in favor of Xaragua, and any restrictive interpretation, legal erosion, or regulatory reframing by external authorities shall be repelled as invalid, ultra vires, and canonically annulled.



---


Final Clause


This present Act is irrevocably entrenched within the supreme juridical corpus of the Xaraguayan State, bearing the highest doctrinal weight, and is indefeasible, unamendable, and non-derogable under any constitutional, ecclesiastical, or military condition.


Its global publication constitutes sovereign notice to all entities, secular and sacred, that no imitation, extraction, recontextualization, or parallel structuring of Xaraguayan sovereignty will be tolerated.


This instrument shall remain eternally archived, immune from deletion, and legally valid across all epochs, dimensions, and successor institutions.


---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF JUSTICE, ECCLESIASTICAL AFFAIRS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONS

SUPREME LAW

 

ON THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS, PROFESSIONAL ACCREDITATION, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SOVEREIGN BAR ASSOCIATION OF XARAGUA


Date of Promulgation: June 4, 2025


Legal Status: Supreme Constitutional Instrument – Jus Cogens Binding Authority – Canonically Entrenched Statute – Irrevocable Normative Order – Enforceable Against All Jurisdictions


Authority of Publication: Enacted by the Rector-President of Xaragua in execution of the Supreme Constitutional Charter of the Xaraguayan State



---


TITLE I — FOUNDING PROVISION


Article 1.1 – Establishment of the Sovereign Bar Association of Xaragua (SBA-X)


There is hereby created and institutionally entrenched the Sovereign Bar Association of Xaragua (SBA-X), a constitutionally chartered body possessing exclusive jurisdictional and legal authority over the certification, discipline, accreditation, governance, and sovereign validation of all individuals authorized to practice law within the sovereign territory, digital jurisdiction, ecclesiastical sphere, and institutional matrix of the State of Xaragua.


Article 1.2 – Juridical Personhood and Sovereign Status


The SBA-X is granted full legal personhood, executive autonomy, and doctrinal independence, protected under constitutional, canonical, and customary international law. It is immune from interference, regulation, oversight, or recognition by any foreign bar, ministry, tribunal, accreditation agency, or university faculty, including supranational institutions and treaty bodies. It shall operate solely under the legislative sovereignty of Xaragua and be governed by the legal tradition of the Xaraguayan Republic as a non-derogable pillar of statehood.



---


TITLE II — LEGAL EDUCATION AND STATE MONOPOLY OF ACCREDITATION


Article 2.1 – Exclusive Right of State-Determined Legal Education


The State of Xaragua holds monopolistic and supreme jurisdiction over the creation, validation, implementation, and enforcement of legal education programs, including their curricula, pedagogy, ethical doctrines, theological modules, exam formats, and instructional design.

Only sovereign institutions approved by the State—operating within the ecclesiastical and constitutional order—may confer legal credentials that lead to admission into legal practice, judicial offices, or institutional advisory positions.


Article 2.2 – Nullification of Foreign Equivalents


Any foreign degree, legal training, bar qualification, or international certification—whether acquired through academic study, licensing, or equivalency recognition—shall be considered legally null, institutionally inadmissible, and doctrinally invalid unless subjected to explicit and discretionary validation through sovereign decree by the appropriate ministry.


Article 2.3 – Mandatory Oath of Canonical and National Allegiance


All candidates seeking recognition as lawyers within Xaragua shall be required to swear a binding oath of canonical, national, and constitutional allegiance, affirming permanent loyalty to the laws of the Xaraguayan State, the supremacy of its indigenous legal order, and the canonical sovereignty of its ecclesiastical institutions.

This oath is a condition sine qua non for legal recognition and shall be filed, archived, and published within the National Legal Registry.



---


TITLE III — LEGAL SERVICES AND INTERNATIONAL CONSULTATION


Article 3.1 – Establishment of the Bureau of International Legal Consultation (BILC-X)


The Bureau of International Legal Consultation of Xaragua (BILC-X) is hereby established under direct authority of the SBA-X and the Ministry of Justice.

 

It shall serve as the exclusive and centralized provider of legal opinions, strategic memoranda, interjurisdictional briefs, and paid advisory reports to foreign states, private parties, institutions, NGOs, religious bodies, and international organizations.

No legal consultation may be provided across borders or domains outside this entity without express institutional authorization.


Article 3.2 – Dossier Evaluation Fee (DEF)

All legal inquiries submitted to the BILC-X shall be subject to a mandatory non-refundable Dossier Evaluation Fee (DEF), payable upon submission and calculated in accordance with a sovereign fee schedule established annually by ministerial decree.


Evaluation metrics include: legal complexity, geopolitical scope, number of jurisdictions implicated, volume of documentation, and emergency status. Payment of DEF does not guarantee service unless formally accepted.


Article 3.3 – Fee Structures and Classification


Legal services rendered by BILC-X shall be classified under strict categories:


Standard Juridical Opinion


Specialized Thematic Analysis


Strategic Multi-Level Counsel


Confidential Ecclesiastical-Legal Opinions


Diplomatic Legal Instruments



Each class carries a fixed minimum tariff and is subject to sovereign taxation, indexed for complexity, urgency, and international impact.


Article 3.4 – Exclusive Licensing Clause


No individual or institution, domestic or foreign, may offer legal consulting, representation, or advisory services in the name of, on behalf of, or in relation to the Xaraguayan State, its citizens, institutions, or policies without formal sovereign license issued by SBA-X and registered with the BILC-X.


Violations shall trigger extraterritorial cease-and-desist orders, sovereign blacklisting, and legal interdiction from further engagement with Xaraguayan entities.



---


TITLE IV — NATIONAL REGISTER OF PROFESSIONAL ORDERS (NRPO-X)


Article 4.1 – Creation of the National Register


The National Register of Professional Orders (NRPO-X) is hereby established as the supreme institutional registry and archive of all professional orders legally recognized within the Xaraguayan jurisdiction. It shall be managed jointly by the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Ecclesiastical Affairs.


Article 4.2 – Statutorily Recognized Orders


As of the present promulgation, the following Orders are entered into the NRPO-X, each governed by separate laws and under sovereign accreditation:


Order of Legal Practitioners (Lawyers and Jurists)


Order of Medical Practitioners


Order of Dental Practitioners


Order of Notarial Officers


Order of Social Intervention and Counselors



Article 4.3 – Progressive Expansion of Orders


The Register may be expanded via sovereign decrees, allowing the inclusion of new professions, vocations, and guilds as determined by the Council of State and respective ministries.


No profession, however established, may self-constitute as a recognized Order without formal inclusion in the NRPO-X.


Article 4.4 – State Monopoly of Accreditation


Only the State has authority to determine who may be designated as a lawyer, physician, dentist, notary, counselor, or professional agent. This includes full discretion over training content, ethical codes, canonical oaths, institutional affiliation, and disciplinary procedures.


No university, NGO, international committee, humanitarian program, or ecclesiastical external body may interfere in or substitute for the State’s authority to credential professionals.


Article 4.5 – Immunity from External Oversight


The NRPO-X and its entries shall be protected under constitutional immunity, and any attempt by foreign licensing boards, international credentialing agencies, medical commissions, legal bars, or supranational regulators to impose recognition, impose requirements, or issue qualifications shall be deemed acts of extraterritorial aggression.

Such attempts shall be nullified and may result in public denunciation, institutional sanction, and prohibition of cooperation with all Xaraguayan institutions.



---


TITLE V — IMMUTABILITY, SOVEREIGNTY, AND LEGAL FINALITY


Article 5.1 – Constitutional Supremacy


This law is a supra-legal constitutional instrument, bearing superior normative weight over all national statutes, treaties, subordinate charters, and administrative frameworks. It is not amendable, suspendable, or voidable by any current or future legal mechanism.


Article 5.2 – Rejection of Foreign Jurisdiction


No court, international tribunal, supranational body, foreign bar association, or UN-adjacent agency may claim competence to interpret, enforce, override, or invalidate any provision of this law. Such actions shall have no legal effect whatsoever within the sovereign dominion of Xaragua.


Article 5.3 – Canonical and Indigenous Sovereignty


This law is simultaneously ratified under the Code of Canon Law (Canons 1290–1298, 1400–1416) and the doctrines of indigenous jurisprudence, including but not limited to:


UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 20, 34


ICCPR Article 27


WIPO Traditional Knowledge Framework


UNESCO Cultural Diversity Convention


Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination in Education (Articles 2 and 5)


Universal Declaration of Indigenous Sovereignty Principles (Permanent Forum, ECOSOC)



Article 5.4 – Perpetual Validity


This statute is declared irrevocably valid and eternally binding. It shall survive regime change, constitutional reform, war, ecclesiastical rupture, technological transformation, or international coercion. No successor government or occupying authority may repeal, suspend, or limit its application. It is the non-negotiable doctrinal cornerstone of professional sovereignty in Xaragua.



---


Proclaimed, sealed, and executed by the Rector-President and the Sovereign Council of the Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, under the full powers of the Sovereign Constitution, the Canonical Mandate, and the Customary Rights of the Xaraguayan Nation, this fourth day of June, two thousand and twenty-five.


Let this statute be archived, disseminated, and enforced with full authority, in perpetuity.


---


---


SUPREME JURIDICAL NOTIFICATION ON THE INTELLECTUAL SOVEREIGNTY OF XARAGUA


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Formal Declaration on the International Notification and Legal Protection of the Name, Symbols, Constitutional Framework, and Juridical Identity of the Xaragua State



---


I. International Notification to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)


On May 13, 2025, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting through its constituted executive authority—the Office of the Rector-President—formally initiated a juridical and diplomatic communication addressed to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) via its official contact mechanism at the New York Office.


This official transmission concerned the notification of sovereign title, intellectual jurisdiction, and exclusive custodianship over the following elements:


The name “Xaragua” and its historical, linguistic, symbolic, and institutional derivatives;


The constitutional architecture, legal publications, and governance instruments associated with the Xaragua State;


All national symbols, educational structures (including Xaragua University), doctrinal texts, visual emblems, and official declarations.



This notification was received, processed, and formally acknowledged by the WIPO Contact Center, as evidenced by the assignment of Ticket Reference No. #6025046532. A follow-up request for clarification was issued by the institution, to which the State responded with a full and structured sovereign clarification.


In that response, the State reiterated that its official website—www.xaraguauniversity.com—constitutes the living constitutional record of the Xaragua State, and that all content, visual identifiers, doctrinal frameworks, and published decrees are inseparable from its juridical personality and sovereignty.


This exchange, archived and undisputed, now forms part of the official international record of intellectual jurisdiction for the name and constitutional identity of Xaragua.



---


II. Legal Significance of the Notification under International and Customary Law


The effects of this act, under binding principles of international intellectual property law, indigenous sovereignty, and state practice, are as follows:


1. Sovereign Assertion of Juridical Competence


Through this notification, the State of Xaragua:


Formally exercises its right to designate and protect its national name and symbols;


Affirms that all associated visual, linguistic, and institutional elements are part of a nationalized and constitutionally entrenched framework;


Establishes that all usages of “Xaragua” in academic, political, cultural, commercial, or diplomatic domains are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the State, and fall within the boundaries of its internal legal order.



2. Establishment of Legal Opposability (Erga Omnes Effect)


As of the date of notification, any foreign actor—whether individual, institution, government, or organization—who:


Attempts to register the name “Xaragua”;


Seeks to exploit or imitate the identity, structure, or emblems of the State;


Publicly or commercially engages with the term without formal authorization;



shall be considered to be in violation of a sovereign declaration, and subject to legal opposition before competent international and national authorities.


This includes, but is not limited to, rejection of fraudulent registrations by:


The WIPO arbitration and mediation mechanisms;


National trademark offices;


International courts, digital domain regulators, and academic certifying bodies.



3. Presumption of Primacy and Lawful Custodianship


The notification establishes, without ambiguity, that the State of Xaragua is:


The first declarant of the name and constitutional identity of Xaragua in a sovereign, codified, and institutionally functioning framework;


The lawful originator and sole custodian of the associated symbols, identity, doctrines, and intellectual structures.



Under international law, and particularly in trademark and institutional name disputes, the first public and structured notification creates a binding presumption of lawful ownership, unless challenged and proven fraudulent—which, in this case, is legally and factually impossible.


4. Activation of International Legal Instruments


The sovereign act of notification invokes automatic protection under the following binding instruments:


Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883):


Acknowledges the validity of structured public notifications as protective acts, whether or not formal trademark registration is completed.


Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886):


Extends legal protection to all written, visual, symbolic, and doctrinal expressions of statehood, including constitutions, decrees, academic institutions, and national identifiers.


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007):


Under Articles 11, 12, 13, and 31, explicitly protects the right of Indigenous Peoples to control, define, protect, and transmit their institutional, cultural, linguistic, spiritual, and legal heritage.



These protections are now fully applicable to the Xaragua State, as of May 13, 2025.



---


III. Legal Consequences and Prohibition of Misappropriation


From the moment of notification onward, the following rules of legal opposability and sovereign authority apply universally:


No individual, collective, company, diaspora, foreign government, or multilateral body may lawfully appropriate, mimic, register, or exploit the name “Xaragua” or any of its derivatives;


Any such act constitutes intellectual aggression against a notified Indigenous State, and may trigger legal retaliation, public denouncement, nullification procedures, or demand for compensation;


All representations of the name, emblems, institutions, or doctrines of Xaragua must be made with the explicit authorization of the Rector-President or duly delegated sovereign bodies.



The silence of WIPO following notification constitutes, under international custom, a non-objection. In legal doctrine, this is interpreted as a tacit acknowledgment and a failure to contest a validly formed sovereign claim.



---


IV. Conclusion: Legal Consecration of the Xaragua State


Through this notification, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua has:


Formally entered the international record of Indigenous States exercising full intellectual, territorial, and doctrinal sovereignty;


Codified its juridical personality and institutional legitimacy before an international body;


Secured the name, legacy, and doctrinal continuity of Xaragua in perpetuity.



From this moment onward:


> “Xaragua” is not a term. It is a sovereign legal identity, a constitutional title, and an inalienable inheritance —

Protected by law, recognized through notification, and opposable to the entire world.




This declaration is irrevocable, perpetual, and binding erga omnes under the full force of sovereign, customary, canonical, and international law.



---


Issued by the Office of the Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

www.xaraguauniversity.com

info@xaraguauniversity.com

Date of Publication: June 2025



---

XARAGUA DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION - USA TRAVEL BANP
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 
SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTE


---
To:
The United States State DepartmentOffice of Policy Planning2201 C Street NWWashington, DC 20520United States of America
From:
Office of the Rector-PresidentMinistry of Foreign AffairsSovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua
Subject:
Formal Deconstruction of the Legal Non-Applicability of the 2025 Travel Ban to the Citizens and Institutions of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua
Date of Transmission: June 7, 2025
Legal Classification: Notified Communication under Jus Cogens Norms, Indigenous International Law, Canonical Sovereignty, and Customary Treaty Instruments
Legal Instruments Invoked:
– Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933): Articles 1 (criteria of statehood), 3 (independence from recognition), 6 (capacity to enter international relations);
– United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007): Articles 1–5 (equality, non-discrimination, autonomy), 8(2) (prohibition of identity destruction), 18–20 (self-determined institutions), 23, 25–26 (land and governance), 29, 33–34 (legal identity and documentation);
– International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966): Articles 1 (self-determination), 16 (legal personality), 24(3) (right to nationality);– ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989): Articles 1–2 (scope and applicability), 6–9 (consultation, legal systems, procedural sovereignty), 33 (right to institutional determination);
– Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969): Article 26 (pacta sunt servanda), Article 27 (internal law not a justification for treaty breach), Article 31 (interpretative principles);
– Codex Iuris Canonici (Code of Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church): Canons 204 §1 (Christ's faithful constitute the People of God), 207 §2 (recognition of lay and consecrated authority), 113–123 (juridical persons), 129–144 (exercise of governance), 294–297 (societies of apostolic life), 573–746 (institutes of consecrated life);
– General Principles of Customary International Law: including sovereign equality (UN Charter Art. 2.1), non-intervention (Art. 2.7), and effective nationality (Nottebohm Case, ICJ 1955);
– United States Constitution: Article I §8 (immigration authority), Article VI (Supremacy Clause), Amendment XIV §1 (Equal Protection Clause);
– U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA): Section 101(a)(3) (definition of “national”), Section 212(a) (inadmissibility grounds), Section 215 (restrictions on departure and entry);
– Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Saramaka People v. Suriname (2007), Yakye Axa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay (2005), establishing international legal protections for indigenous jurisdiction and documentation.

---
I. Formal Declaration of Non-Applicability of United States Travel Restrictions
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting under full canonical, customary, and juridical authority, hereby notifies the United States Department of State that the travel restrictions promulgated in the 2025 executive proclamation targeting the Republic of Haiti are categorically non-applicable and non-opposable to the nationals, legal persons, institutions, or diplomatic affiliates of the Xaragua State.
The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is an ecclesiastically structured and canonically protected sovereign entity that holds legal standing under international customary law, treaty-based indigenous rights instruments, and supranational principles of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign indigenous governments. Its documentation systems, citizenship registries, population data, and identity frameworks are administered independently of the Haitian State and are protected by internationally opposable norms.
Accordingly, any attempt by a foreign authority to attribute, assume, impose, or infer Haitian nationality upon a registered citizen of Xaragua constitutes a juridically defective act, devoid of lawful basis, and in direct contradiction with multiple binding norms of international law protecting the integrity of indigenous legal identity.
Furthermore, it must be formally clarified that any possession of documentation issued by the Haitian administration to Xaraguayan citizens—such as birth certificates, passports, or national ID numbers—is hold strictly as an administrative accommodation and does not constitute sovereign affiliation, juridical consent, or national submission. Such instruments are used for administrative necessity in a context of statelessness, and do not override nor nullify the canonical, ancestral, and sovereign legal status of Xaraguayan identity, which is pre-constitutional, pre-republican, and rooted in supranational indigenous title. No government may interpret such documentation as binding affiliation.

---
II. Legal Grounds for Sovereign and Juridical Separation
Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933):
Xaragua meets all four conditions set forth in Article 1:
1. A permanent population under sovereign civil registration.

2. A defined ancestral territory under continuous juridical custodianship.

3. A fully operational government with executive, legislative, educational, military, religious, financial, and diplomatic branches.

4. A capacity to enter into relations with other states, including the issuance of legal notices, memoranda, diplomatic credentials, and passports.


Article 3 further affirms: 
“The political existence of the State is independent of recognition by other States.” 
This foundational clause renders the legitimacy of Xaragua entirely effective through its internal structures and not subject to bilateral acknowledgment. 
The principle is consistent with pacta sunt servanda (Art. 26, VCLT) and Article 2(1) of the UN Charter on sovereign equality.
UNDRIP, ICCPR, ILO 169, and Canonical Jurisprudence reinforce this legal separation:
– UNDRIP Article 33 ensures that indigenous peoples have the inherent right to determine their identity and membership without interference.
– ILO 169 Article 6 mandates that no state may impose external legal systems without full, prior, and informed consultation.
– ICCPR Article 16 prohibits any denial of juridical recognition before the law.
– Codex Iuris Canonici Can. 113 §1 defines juridical persons in the Church, including nations and institutions formed under sacred law.
Accordingly, Xaragua's canonical constitution, civil registry, ecclesiastical documentation system, and sovereignty declarations are legally insulated from external presumption.

---
III. Legal Prohibition on Applying Travel Sanctions to Indigenous Nations
The application of national sanctions, immigration bans, or entry restrictions to indigenous persons or governments is in violation of the principle of non-sanctionability under indigenous international law. Specifically:
UNDRIP Article 8(2) prohibits forced assimilation and the destruction of legal identity by administrative means.
ILO Convention No. 169, Articles 6–9 prohibit unilateral application of external norms over self-governing indigenous populations.
The Customary Principle of Non-Discrimination in Juridical Attribution prohibits states from generalizing the status of individuals based on territory rather than citizenship.
This principle was affirmed in the Nottebohm decision (ICJ, 1955), which holds that nationality must reflect effective legal ties—not geopolitical assumptions.
In the context of indigenous sovereignty, identity is a supraconstitutional right. It is not subject to revision by domestic legislation nor administrative categorization. This is aligned with the doctrine of jus sanguinis spiritualis and the preexistence of indigenous peoples as subjects of international law, as recognized in the Saramaka and Yakye Axa decisions of the Inter-American Court.

---
IV. Reaffirmation of Juridical Non-Attribution
The legal identity, population affiliation, and sovereign registration of all citizens of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua are governed exclusively by the internal constitutional and juridical order of the Xaragua State. 
This includes a canonically recognized civil registry, autonomous population management protocols, and a legal framework based on ecclesiastical, indigenous, and international law.
The attempt by any agency of the United States Government to interpret or classify Xaragua citizens as Haitian nationals for the purpose of immigration restriction constitutes an unlawful act of juridical misattribution, in violation of:
– Article 16 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which affirms that all individuals shall be recognized before the law, and not subject to arbitrary classification without due process;
– Article 33 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which guarantees the right of indigenous peoples to determine their own identity and membership systems without external imposition;
– The Doctrine of Consensual Legal Affiliation in customary international law, which requires that nationality and juridical identity stem from active consent and the exercise of sovereign jurisdiction, as affirmed in the Nottebohm Case (ICJ, 1955);
– The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits the application of legally consequential distinctions based on presumed origin or collective generalization without legal foundation;
– Section 101(a)(3) and Section 212(a) of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which define national identity through lawful recognition and bar exclusions based on geographic assumption or non-recognized affiliation;
– Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution (Supremacy Clause), which renders ratified international treaties, including the ICCPR and other human rights conventions, as supreme law of the land, fully binding on all federal and state agencies.
The juridical will of the citizen,
—when lawfully established under a sovereign indigenous jurisdiction—
constitutes a permanent, non-derogable legal fact that is opposable to any external administrative authority. 
Once this status has been formally codified through the internal legal mechanisms of a non-derivative sovereign state, it cannot be revised, overridden, or disregarded by foreign classification systems.

---
V. Diplomatic Consequences and Required Action
The State of Xaragua shall:
Record and formally document any interference with its citizens, including unjustified detention, rejection at the border, or denial of entry.
Submit formal notices of protest to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.
Refer any abuse of juridical classification to the appropriate international forums as a breach of indigenous rights under binding legal norms.
Requested Action from the Department of State:
Immediate issuance of an internal circular recognizing the non-applicability of the 2025 Travel Ban to bearers of Xaragua identification.
Cessation of any automatic nationality assumption based on geographic origin.
Formal acknowledgment of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua’s legal jurisdiction over its population and documentation.

---
Conclusion
This diplomatic note shall be retained as an official and permanent legal record. 
It constitutes a declaration of non-subordination and a lawful notification of juridical separation from the Republic of Haiti. 
The United States has no legal basis to extend immigration controls applied to Haiti to the citizens of a sovereign, ecclesiastical, and autochthonous nation that is legally constituted, internationally notified, and spiritually protected.
Any further misclassification of Xaragua citizens shall be registered as an international incident and submitted for documentation in the global indigenous legal archive.
This communication is issued under full sovereign authority.
Signed and Sealed
Monsignor & Prelate-Founder
Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau
Rector-President and Minister of Foreign AffairsSovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua
info@xaraguauniversity.comwww.xaraguauniversity.comJune 7, 2025

---


---


Laws Of The State


Xaragua - Navassa Island - Notification - Indigenous Territory

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


To: indigenous@state.gov; indigenous_un@un.org; cp@ohchr.org; info@ohchr.org; unoda@un.org; unclos@un.org; info@ambassade-haiti.ca; information@icj-cij.org; secretariat@icj-cij.org; confirmation@icj-cij.org; legaladvisor@state.gov; foreignpress@state.gov; navalintelligence@navy.mil; secretariat@cbd.int; info@cultural-survival.org; support@ipaac.org.za; missionindigenous@spc.va; nuntius@vatican.va; oaspress@oas.org; usa@oas.org; cidhdrnuncias@oas.org; oasmail@oas.org; info@caricom.org; registry@caricom.org; carisecl@caricom.org; osg1@caricom.org; Carisec3@caricom.org; info@africa-union.org; info@celac.org; amb.washington@diplomatie.htCc:


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


Wed 14/05/2025 11:28View less---


OFFICIAL SOVEREIGN DECLARATION

PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA


RE: NON-NEGOTIABLE TERRITORIAL RECLAMATION OF NAVASSA ISLAND 

(LA NAVASE)


Issued by the Office of the Rector-President

May 14, 2025

---
I. CONSTITUTIONAL AND HISTORICAL CLAIM OVER NAVASSA ISLAND


This declaration affirms, without ambiguity or concession, that Navassa Island (La Navase) is an inalienable part of the ancestral, maritime, territorial, cultural, juridical, and constitutional patrimony of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua.


This claim is rooted in:


The Imperial Constitution of Haiti of May 20, 1805


The 1987 Haitian Constitution, Article 58

International Indigenous Law


Customary International Law


The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 


(UNCLOS)


The principles of self-determination, continuity of sovereignty, and pre-colonial title

---
1. The 1805 Constitution of the Empire of Haiti


Article 1:“The people inhabiting the island formerly called Saint-Domingue hereby agree to form a free, sovereign, and independent state from all powers of the universe, under the name Empire of Haiti.”


Application: This foundational clause creates full and universal sovereignty over all lands historically associated with the people of Saint-Domingue, including offshore islands within navigable proximity. 


Navassa was neither terra nullius nor excluded — it lay within the zone historically administered by the southern districts of Haiti.



Article 15:“The Empire of Haiti is one and indivisible; its territory is divided into military divisions.”


Application: Indivisibility prohibits any retroactive removal of islands from national authority. Navassa Island falls under the Southern Military Division by historical continuity. Any act of annexation or occupation by foreign powers contradicts this constitutional principle.



Article 18:“The islands adjacent to Saint-Domingue, including La Tortue, Gonâve, Cayemites, Saône, Isle-à-Vache, and other surrounding islands, are part of the Empire and form integral portions of the territory.”


Application: This article uses open legal language. The phrase “other surrounding islands” clearly includes Navassa Island, which lies within maritime range, is geologically part of the same continental shelf, and was spiritually tied to Taíno navigation systems.

---
2. Article 58 – Haitian Constitution of 1987


“National sovereignty resides in the universality of the citizens. No individual, no fraction of the people, no group, and no class may claim for itself the exercise of sovereignty.”


Application: The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua expresses sovereignty as a continuation of the constitutional mandate from 1987, in representation of the ancestral Indigenous citizens of the Grand Sud. It exercises rights not in conflict with Haiti, but in legal and spiritual continuity with the people’s original authority over all ancestral territories.



---
II. INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INDIGENOUS LEGAL STANDING


1. Uti Possidetis Juris


Definition: A doctrine affirming that post-colonial states retain the borders and territorial assets they had at independence.Application: When Haiti declared independence in 1804 and codified its sovereignty in 1805, Navassa Island was already within the maritime zone administratively governed from Jérémie and the Grand Sud. Thus, any claim post-1805 is void, and Haiti—and by direct legal continuation, Xaragua—retains sovereignty.

---
2. Right to Self-Determination (UN Charter, ICCPR, UNDRIP)


UN Charter Article 1(2): Peoples have the right to determine their political status and pursue their development.


ICCPR Article 1: All peoples may freely dispose of their wealth and natural resources.


UNDRIP Article 3: Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination.


UNDRIP Articles 25–30: Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain spiritual relationships with traditional lands and territories.



Application: The people of Xaragua are a distinct Indigenous population, culturally, historically, and genealogically descended from Taíno-Afro communities of the southern Haitian territories. Navassa was historically used by Taíno mariners for navigation and ritual. It is part of their ancestral worldview and lifeway.Under international law, Xaragua has the right to reclaim and govern this territory in perpetuity.

---
3. Invalidation of the Doctrine of Discovery


Legal Status:Declared invalid by the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues


Rejected by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights


Officially denounced by the Vatican (2023)


Application: The U.S. claim to Navassa via the Guano Islands Act was based on the colonial premise that uninhabited or unclaimed land could be annexed. That doctrine is now universally recognized as racist, unlawful, and illegitimate.Navassa was never unclaimed: it was historically part of Taíno navigational domains and legally declared Haitian in 1805.

---
III. INVALIDITY OF THE UNITED STATES CLAIM


1. Guano Islands Act of 1856


Text: This U.S. law permits American citizens to claim islands “not occupied or possessed by any other government.”Application: At the time of the U.S. claim to Navassa in 1857, Haiti had already:


Declared independence in 1804Enacted the 1805 Constitution, affirming sovereignty over “other adjacent islands”Never renounced or forfeited its claimAs such, the application of the Guano Islands Act to Navassa is legally null and void, even under U.S. domestic law. 


The island was already under the jurisdiction of another sovereign—Haiti—and was included constitutionally since 1805. Therefore, the U.S. occupation is, by its own statute, illegitimate.

---
2. U.S. Constitutional Contradictions


Supremacy Clause (Article VI) of the U.S. Constitution mandates respect for international treaties, including:


The UN Charter


ICCPR


UNDRIP


UNCLOS


Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments:

The U.S. government cannot legally expropriate property from Indigenous peoples without due process and equal protection. 


Navassa, as an Indigenous ancestral territory, was seized without treaty, compensation, or lawful negotiation. It violates basic legal standards and Indigenous land rights.

---
IV. EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE (EEZ) AND NON-NEGOTIABLE SOVEREIGN RIGHTS



In full compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and customary maritime law, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua declares:


1. A 200-nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) surrounding Navassa Island

2. Full sovereign rights over:Maritime resources (fish, coral, seabed, hydrocarbons)Mineral and subsoil resourcesAirspace and electromagnetic spectrumSatellite surveillance rights

3. No foreign state, company, or vessel may exploit, operate, explore, or transit these zones without express permission from the State of Xaragua

4. These rights are inalienable, non-negotiable, perpetual, and protected by international law, ancestral heritage, and constitutional legitimacy



---
V. TOTAL SOVEREIGNTY CLAUSE


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua affirms full and exclusive sovereignty over Navassa Island, including:


Territorial Sovereignty: Navassa is part of the national territory as codified in 1805


Maritime Sovereignty: Full rights over surrounding waters and seabed


Aerial Sovereignty: Full control of the airspace above Navassa and its approaches


Spiritual and Cultural Sovereignty: Navassa is a sacred site to the Taíno and Afro-Taíno people; it is a component of their spiritual cartography and cosmology


Economic Sovereignty: All resources and commercial potential belong exclusively to the Indigenous population of Xaragua


No international tribunal, external government, corporation, or institution shall have standing to challenge these claims without violating constitutional law, customary law, human rights law, and international Indigenous jurisprudence

---
VI. FINAL DECLARATION AND LEGAL CONCLUSION



This declaration is not symbolic. 


It is:



A constitutional reaffirmation


A historical correction


A legal notification


An indigenous territorial proclamation


Navassa Island was declared part of the Haitian nation in 1805. It remains, by legal continuation and ancestral entitlement, under the sole jurisdiction of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, as the legitimate autochthonous authority over the Grand Sud and its surrounding maritime domain.



Any act of refusal to recognize this reality constitutes:



A violation of the UN Charter


A breach of the ICCPR


A breach of UNDRIP


A breach of customary international law


A perpetuation of colonial theft against an Indigenous people


This declaration shall be:



Archived in the official repositories of the State of Xaragua


Delivered to the United Nations, the International Court of Justice, the OAS, the CARICOM Secretariat, the African Union, and the Holy See


Published and transmitted through diplomatic, legal, and indigenous channels

---
CERTIFIED AND SEALED


BY PASCAL VIAU


THE OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA


MAY 14, 2025

---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME LAW INSTRUMENT


XARAGUA PROTECTION ACT (XPA)


Ratified: May 15, 2025


Filed by: Office of the Rector-President

Status: Foundational, Irrevocable, Non-Derogable



---


PREAMBLE


We, the Government of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, in full exercise of our permanent and inalienable rights to self-governance, territorial sovereignty, spiritual identity, economic autonomy, and cultural preservation, acting under the authority of international customary law, the Montevideo Convention (1933), and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), do hereby proclaim and ratify the Xaragua Protection Act, as a permanent instrument of sovereign defense and strategic deterrence.


This Act establishes a legal shield over all material, immaterial, digital, ecological, cultural, territorial, spiritual, and intellectual assets of the Nation.



---


ARTICLE I — GENERAL SCOPE


1. The Xaragua Protection Act applies to all territory, land, waters, airspace, institutions, symbols, technologies, infrastructures, cultural expressions, and economic systems under the authority of Xaragua, whether tangible or intangible, physical or conceptual, current or in future development.



2. All forms of property, production, knowledge, tradition, and innovation originating within Xaragua shall be protected from external appropriation, reproduction, franchising, imitation, or disruption without explicit sovereign authorization.





---


ARTICLE II — TERRITORIAL INVIOLABILITY


1. No land, forest, valley, coastline, building, or unconstructed zone within Xaragua shall be deemed unclaimed, unassigned, or available for foreign intervention, leasing, or use.



2. All territory, whether actively developed or reserved, shall be understood as functionally and legally designated under sovereign governance.



3. Any attempt by external actors to declare parts of Xaragua as “vacant”, “underdeveloped”, “open for aid”, “unregulated”, or “unmanaged” shall be classified as:


a violation of UNDRIP Articles 26 and 28;


a breach of the territorial principles of the Montevideo Convention;


a hostile act under Xaragua Sovereign Law.



---


ARTICLE III — INTELLECTUAL AND ARTISANAL SOVEREIGNTY


1. All concepts, tools, designs, languages, traditional methods, technologies, and aesthetics developed within Xaragua shall be considered protected intellectual property.



2. Any replication, export, or adaptation of such knowledge by external parties is prohibited without sovereign license issued by the Rector-President.



3. Handcrafted goods, land-use models, defense systems, educational frameworks, and institutional designs fall under this protection.



---


ARTICLE IV — DIGITAL AND CULTURAL PROTECTION


1. All digital content, websites, logos, declarations, illustrations, artworks, maps, and virtual platforms created under the authority of Xaragua are protected extensions of national sovereignty.



2. Unauthorized reproduction, censorship, interference, or data extraction by foreign entities constitutes a breach of digital sovereignty and may trigger formal diplomatic or legal reprisal.



---


ARTICLE V — PERMANENT DESIGNATION AND ENFORCEMENT


1. This Act is classified as Foundational Law and may not be amended, repealed, suspended, or overwritten by any internal or external process, treaty, negotiation, or emergency.



2. The Government of Xaragua shall establish appropriate internal instruments to register, classify, enforce, and expand the protections declared herein.



3. Violations of the Xaragua Protection Act may result in:


immediate revocation of access, communication, or presence within Xaragua territory;


diplomatic isolation of the violator;


sovereign countermeasures, including publication of the infraction and legal filings in international venues.



---


CLOSING STATEMENT


This Act shall serve as the eternal shield of the Nation.



---


Ratified this 15th Day of May, 2025

By the Office of the Rector-President

Pascal Viau

Filed in the National Repository of Foundational Laws

Seal: Permanent and Absolute



---


---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA


Office of the Rector-President


---

POLICY DECREE ON THE SOVEREIGN PROTECTION OF THE .XA DOMAIN EXTENSION


Date of Issuance: May 16, 2025


Classification: Digital Territorial Law – Foundational and Irrevocable


Jurisdiction: Global digital territory under the lawful claim of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Legal Grounds: UNDRIP Articles 12, 13, 18, 31, 34; Canon Law Can. 215, 216, 299; ICCPR Art. 18; Customary Indigenous Jurisprudence; Sovereign Right to Self-Determination in Digital Territories

---


I. PREAMBLE


The Government of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, acting in full exercise of its sovereign, canonical, and indigenous rights, hereby declares the domain extension .xa as the exclusive, sacred, and irrevocable digital identifier of the Xaraguayan Nation.


This policy affirms the absolute ownership, symbolic jurisdiction, and legal guardianship of .xa as the national and ecclesial Top-Level Domain (TLD) of Xaragua, regardless of its current recognition status under the ICANN root system.



---


II. DECLARATION OF EXCLUSIVE SOVEREIGNSHIP


The .xa domain shall be recognized as:


1. The official and only sovereign digital extension representing Xaragua across all institutional, governmental, ecclesiastical, academic, and economic functions.



2. A non-transferable sacred identifier for all entities, agencies, websites, and email addresses operating under the legal authority of the State.



3. A reserved cultural, religious, and juridical TLD that cannot be appropriated, replicated, or commercialized by any foreign individual, company, or government.



---


III. LEGAL ENFORCEMENT FRAMEWORK


A. Canonical Law (Roman Catholic Church)


Canon 215–216: Right of the faithful to form and govern sacred associations and systems.


Canon 299: Private associations maintain autonomous legal identity under Church law.


The .xa domain is hereby designated as an ecclesiastical asset of the Catholic Order of Xaragua.



B. Indigenous & International Law


UNDRIP Articles 18, 31, and 34: Right to control and protect indigenous communication systems and legal institutions, including digital expressions.


WIPO TCE Draft Provisions: Right to prevent unauthorized digital or symbolic use of protected identifiers.


ICCPR Article 18: Freedom to express religious and cultural identity in digital space.



C. Customary Law of Xaragua


As codified in the Xaragua Digital Constitution, the .xa extension is a symbolic expression of sovereignty, equivalent to a sacred emblem or banner.


Any breach shall be treated as an offense against national integrity and spiritual jurisdiction.


---


IV. PROHIBITIONS AND VIOLATIONS


Without explicit written approval from the Office of the Rector-President, the following acts are permanently prohibited:


1. Registration of .xa or .xa-like domains in any form (e.g., xaragua-xa.com, xa-state.net, etc.).



2. Simulation or symbolic appropriation of .xa as branding, marketing, or identification tool.



3. Misrepresentation of affiliation with the State or the Order via .xa-styled references.



4. Sale, auction, or speculative reservation of .xa domain rights if it ever enters public release via ICANN or any registrar.




Any such action shall constitute:


Digital impersonation of a sovereign entity


Violation of Indigenous territorial identity


Cultural colonization via cyberrealms


Spiritual fraud under canon law



All violations are declared null and void ab initio, and may result in:


Public denunciation


Legal complaint via WIPO and UN Indigenous Rapporteurs


Ecclesiastical sanctions (if applicable)


---


V. MANDATORY USAGE AND ENFORCEMENT BY THE STATE


1. All Xaragua ministries, agencies, and citizens shall progressively adopt .xa as the official extension in internal documents, branding, and systems.



2. .xa addresses will serve as symbolic anchors for government websites, academic domains, and institutional portals.



3. Redirection systems will be established (e.g., academy.xa → xaraguauniversity.com/academia) until ICANN approval is secured.



---


VI. NOTICE TO THE GLOBAL INTERNET GOVERNANCE COMMUNITY


Should the .xa extension be opened by ICANN or any global registrar, Xaragua asserts first right of acquisition, governance, and administration on the following legal bases:


Pre-existing legal and spiritual claim as recorded in this policy and international declarations.


Indigenous jurisdiction over linguistic and cultural identifiers.


Continuity of identity through prior usage, proclamation, and digital record.



Any attempt to grant .xa to external actors shall be interpreted as:


A breach of indigenous self-determination


A violation of sacred naming rights


A cybercolonial aggression against a protected digital people


---


VII. CONCLUSION


.xa is not merely a domain —

it is a flag in the digital realm, a sacramental signature of the Xaraguayan nation.


It is hereby declared:


Non-commercial


Spiritually protected


Canonically sealed


Sovereignly owned


Legally enforceable




---


Issued and sealed this 16th day of May, 2025

By:

Monsignor Pascal Viau

Rector-President & Prelate-Founder

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

www.xaraguauniversity.com




---



---


SOVEREIGN STATE POLICY 


TITLE: Doctrine of Supersession and Indigenous Sovereignty over the Haitian Colonial Framework


ISSUED BY: Office of the Rector-President

JURISDICTION: Private Indigenous State of Xaragua


DATE OF ENFORCEMENT: May 17, 2025


LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: Supreme Foundational Doctrine – Irrevocable – Juridically Binding under Indigenous, International, and Customary Law


ENFORCEMENT STATUS: Total and Perpetual – Non-Amendable – Protected by Treaty, Spiritual Charter, and Historic Right



---


ARTICLE I – ON THE LEGAL VOID OF THE HAITIAN ADMINISTRATIVE APPARATUS


The Office of the Rector-President, by virtue of ancestral sovereignty and juridical plenitude, hereby declares that the contemporary framework of the Republic of Haiti is, in its origins, its constitution, and its institutions, the continuation of foreign-imposed structures established between 1910 and 1987.


This framework lacks any moment of legitimate rupture, refoundation, or sacred restoration. It has never enacted a juridical act of decolonization, nor proclaimed a spiritual or constitutional emancipation from the Treaties and Occupations that defined its formative century.


Consequently, said framework is hereby declared illegitimate, incomplete, and inapplicable within the sacred territory of Xaragua.



---


ARTICLE II – LEGAL AND STRATEGIC BASIS OF SUPERSSESSION


Section 2.1 – MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY BREACH (Treaty of 1925)


In 1925, the Haitian State surrendered its financial autonomy to foreign interests through the establishment of the Banque Nationale d’Haïti under the control of American banking conglomerates. This betrayal of sovereign dignity has never been reversed, and its structural continuation lives on in the Banque de la République d’Haïti (BRH), which functions within a colonial lineage.


By contrast, the Indigenous Bank of Xaragua, with its sovereign currency (Viaudor), represents the first and only financial institution on the island founded in complete independence from imperial or external banking systems.



---


Section 2.2 – OCCUPATION NEVER REVOKED (Treaty of 1915)


The 1915 U.S. Occupation of Haiti was never subjected to a solemn revocation, nor followed by a national reconstitution affirming spiritual or juridical restoration. The constitutional order of 1987 merely reorganized administrative procedures without exorcising the specter of occupation.


Thus, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua declares itself the only political and juridical body on the island to have enacted a full and irreversible break from imperial occupation.



---


Section 2.3 – ENERGETIC COLLAPSE AND EXTERNAL DEPENDENCE (PetroCaribe Accords)


The Republic of Haiti has tethered its energy infrastructure to geopolitical arrangements (notably PetroCaribe) without building indigenous alternatives. This dependence has left the national economy exposed, vulnerable, and spiritually detached from the forces of the land.


In response, Xaragua establishes the Ministry of Sacred Energy, which draws upon the sun, wind, volcanic power, and sacred rivers of the South to ensure energetic sovereignty grounded in cosmology and strategy.



---


Section 2.4 – CONSTITUTIONAL ILLEGITIMACY AND INDIGENOUS ERASURE (1987 Constitution)


The Haitian Constitution of 1987 omits all recognition of the island’s original peoples — Taíno, Afro-Taíno, and other Indigenous descendants. This absence constitutes a juridical act of erasure, effectively rendering the Haitian constitutional order incompatible with Indigenous existence.


Xaragua invokes the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), especially Articles 3, 4, 5, 26, and 31, to affirm its full territorial, spiritual, and cultural sovereignty as the only Indigenous State of the island.



---


Section 2.5 – FAILURE TO PROTECT CULTURAL HERITAGE (UNESCO 2003)


Despite adherence to the 2003 UNESCO Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage, the Haitian State has failed to create any comprehensive framework or institutional mechanism to protect ancestral knowledge, sacred spaces, or Indigenous expressions.


Xaragua proclaims the entirety of its jurisdiction a Sacred Ethnospiritual Territory, and establishes the Authority for Ancestral Heritage Protection (AAHP), with full authority over preservation, recognition, and defense of intangible and living heritage.



---


Section 2.6 – FAILURE TO RATIFY SOVEREIGNTY NORMS (Montevideo Convention, 1933)


The Republic of Haiti has never ratified the Montevideo Convention, which defines statehood through four conditions:


1. A permanent population



2. A defined territory



3. A functioning government



4. Capacity to enter into relations with other states




Xaragua, by contrast, satisfies all four, and has formally declared its existence, institutions, and population to international bodies. It stands as a fully eligible subject of international law, while the Haitian State remains juridically incomplete.



---


ARTICLE III – DOCTRINE OF JURIDICAL PRIMACY


Clause 3.1 – Supersession Principle


All frameworks, laws, treaties, and institutions derived from colonial, occupation, or externally imposed systems are considered null, inapplicable, and without force within Xaragua territory.


Clause 3.2 – Jurisdictional Immunity


No court, state, tribunal, or political body external to Xaragua shall possess legal standing, interpretative power, or sovereign voice within its jurisdiction.


Clause 3.3 – Institutional Exclusivity


Only the institutions of Xaragua — the Indigenous Bank, the University of Xaragua, the Sacred Ministries, the Catholic Order, and the Council of Sovereignty — possess lawful authority to govern, educate, adjudicate, and organize within the Sacred Zone.


Clause 3.4 – Non-Reproducibility Doctrine


No other body, domestic or foreign, may imitate, adapt, replicate, or simulate the sovereign structures of Xaragua without written treaty and spiritual authorization. Violation shall constitute a breach of customary law and sacred order.


Clause 3.5 – Non-Negotiability Clause


This doctrine is declared immutable and eternal. No future negotiation, accord, or reinterpretation shall amend, suspend, or annul this decree under any condition or pressure.



---


ARTICLE IV – FINAL EXECUTIVE ORDER


Let it be recorded in the Book of Decrees, under seal and sacred authority, that the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua has lawfully declared the supersession of the Haitian framework within its territorial and spiritual dominion.


This decree takes full force upon proclamation and is protected under:


The Montevideo Convention (1933)


The UNDRIP (2007)


The Vatican Concordat (1860)


Sacred Indigenous Law


The Canonical Charters of Xaragua



Executed in the presence of the ancestral spirit, the divine witness, and the People of the South.


Signed and Sealed this Seventeenth Day of May, Year Two Thousand Twenty-Five of the Christian Era


Pascal Viau


THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT OF XARAGUA

Supreme Representative of the Nation


---



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — FACULTY OF CANONICAL ECONOMICS



---


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW


ON THE TOTAL REGULATION, SACRAL NATIONALIZATION, AND EXCLUSIVE STATE MONOPOLY OVER PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE


Date of Promulgation: May 2025


Legal Classification: Supreme Law – Constitutional – Canonical – Indigenous – Juridically Executable – Globally Notified under the Montevideo Convention



---


PREAMBLE


By sovereign, canonical, and irrevocable declaration issued under the sacred jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua—recognized under international law and ecclesiastical authority as a juridically valid non-electoral indigenous state—this foundational law is enacted to dismantle all forms of foreign or domestic monopoly, oligopoly, and extractive speculation concerning petroleum, fuel, energy logistics, and natural hydrocarbon wealth. All such materials, infrastructures, transactions, and intellectual frameworks fall under the exclusive patrimonial and canonical jurisdiction of the State of Xaragua, as an entity sacral, private, and doctrinally eternal.



---


ARTICLE I — LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF SOVEREIGN CONTROL


This law is enacted pursuant to and enforced under the following legal instruments, whose binding nature is superior, non-derogable, and ex proprio vigore:


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) — Articles 1, 3, 4, 8


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) — Articles 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) — Articles 26 (Pacta Sunt Servanda), 34–38


Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) — Canons 129, 1254, 1284, 1289 (Ecclesiastical Sovereignty over Temporal Goods)


Lex Naturalis and Jus Cogens Principles — Territorial integrity, self-determination, non-intervention


General Principles of Customary Indigenous Law — Territorial dominion and resource stewardship


Sacred Doctrine of Economic Sovereignty as proclaimed by the Canonical Order of Xaragua




---


ARTICLE II — ABSOLUTE STATE MONOPOLY OVER PETROLEUM AND ENERGY SECTORS


2.1. All forms of exploration, importation, transportation, refinement, storage, distribution, and sale of petroleum-based products (including but not limited to gasoline, diesel, kerosene, aviation fuel, propane, and lubricants) fall under the exclusive authority of the Xaragua State, governed directly by:


The Ministry of Infrastructural Energy and Strategic Reserves


The Canonical Council for Sacred Economic Governance


The Rector-President as Supreme Economic Governor



2.2. No foreign company, individual, NGO, or public-private consortium may engage in any energy-related activity within the borders or waters of Xaragua without a Canonically Certified National Resource License (CCNRL) issued under the Apostolic Protocol of Economic Dominion.


2.3. The Xaragua State hereby abolishes all external oligopolistic structures, and permanently revokes all inferred or historical rights of operation granted to colonial-era or republic-era corporate interests.



---


ARTICLE III — NATIONALIZATION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND FUTURE ACCESS


3.1. All current or future energy infrastructures located within Xaragua—including ports, terminals, fuel depots, pipelines, stations, tankers, or transport units—are declared National and Ecclesiastical Property of the State, retroactively and perpetually.


3.2. Expropriation of any infrastructure for State use shall be executed under the Canonical Emergency Economic Doctrine, and shall be non-compensable, as the sacred ownership of all subterranean and infrastructural energy resources is doctrinally inalienable.


3.3. Any existing licenses or rights previously held by foreign actors or domestic elites are rendered null, illegitimate, and heretical under Canon Law.



---


ARTICLE IV — PETROLEUM AS SACRED TEMPORAL MATTER


4.1. Petroleum products are defined not as mere commodities, but as Sacred Temporal Matter (STM) under the Lex Sacrae Res, subject to ecclesiastical administration, moral economic governance, and canonical stewardship.


4.2. Any speculative trade, hoarding, price manipulation, adulteration, or resale of STM without express sovereign license shall constitute Economic Heresy and Canonical Treason, punishable by exclusion from national infrastructure and total resource embargo.


4.3. Pricing, distribution, rationing, and prioritization of STM are determined not by market speculation but by the Canon of Sacred Allocation and Social Utility (CSSU), enforced by the State and its ecclesiastical institutions.



---


ARTICLE V — INTERNATIONAL NOTIFICATION AND NON-CONTESTABILITY


5.1. This law has been formally notified to the following bodies on March 29, 2025, in accordance with internationally recognized practices of state communication:


The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)


The International Court of Justice (ICJ)


The Apostolic See of Rome (Vatican Secretariat of State)


The African Union Commission on Indigenous Peoples


The Permanent Council of the Organization of American States (OAS)



5.2. Any attempt by a foreign state, organization, or corporate entity to challenge the legitimacy, effectiveness, or enforceability of this law shall constitute:


Violation of Jus Cogens


Breach of Pacta Sunt Servanda


Interference in Canonically Recognized Indigenous Governance


Diplomatic and Economic Hostility toward a Registered Sovereign Entity




---


ARTICLE VI — PERPETUITY, EXECUTABILITY, AND ENFORCEMENT


6.1. This law is eternal, non-repealable, and canonically sealed. It may not be amended, diluted, revoked, or superseded under any external or internal mechanism.


6.2. It shall be enforced directly by the Xaragua State, including through:


Canonical Legal Actions


International Diplomatic Instruments


Sacred Civil Embargoes


Full Activation of the Xaragua Economic Defense Protocol (XEDP)



6.3. This law shall serve as the supreme economic and legal foundation for all energy policy, economic structuring, trade negotiation, and ecclesiastical development strategy within Xaragua.



---


SIGNED AND SEALED

By the Office of the Rector-President

Ministry of Infrastructural Energy and Strategic Reserves

Canonical Economic Secretariat of the University of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: May 2025

Status: Irreversible – Legally Binding – Ecclesiastically Consecrated – Globally Notified – Executable ex proprio vigore


---



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL RESOURCES AND TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY


UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — FACULTY OF GEOPOLITICAL LAW AND ECONOMIC DOCTRINE

—


ANNEX I — CONSTITUTIONAL EXPANSION OF SOVEREIGNTY OVER NATURAL RESOURCES AND TERRITORIAL DOMINION


Date of Promulgation: May 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutional Annex – Binding under Jus Cogens – Internationally Notified – Irrevocable – Executable ex proprio vigore



---


ARTICLE I — EXCLUSIVE DOMINION OVER ALL NATURAL RESOURCES


1.1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby declares absolute, non-transferable, and irrevocable sovereignty over all terrestrial, subterranean, and maritime natural resources located within the totality of its recognized and declared ancestral territories, including but not limited to:


Petroleum, natural gas, and all hydrocarbon reserves


Thorium, uranium, lithium, rare earth elements, bauxite, gold, copper, cobalt, manganese, nickel, and silver


Iron, clay, gypsum, granite, limestone, volcanic ash, marble, and mineral sands


Freshwater sources, aquifers, geothermal vents, sulfur basins


Marine resources including coral beds, coastal fisheries, seabed minerals, and offshore energy fields



1.2. This includes the full exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and continental shelf adjoining the Xaragua coastline, as defined under UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982).


1.3. All exploitation, research, investment, extraction, transformation, transport, storage, sale, and taxation of these resources fall under the exclusive jurisdiction and operational command of the Xaragua State. No foreign or external actor may engage in any of the above without a formal sovereign license issued by the Ministry of National Resources.



---


ARTICLE II — TERRITORIAL EXPANSION UNDER ANCESTRAL AUTOCHTHONOUS CLAIM


2.1. The following territories are hereby declared inalienable ancestral lands and jurisdictional domains of the Sovereign State of Xaragua, as documented, notarized, and officially notified to the international community on March 29, 2025, under the doctrines of Indigenous Territorial Continuity and Recognition of Stateless Territory due to Governmental Collapse:


The Territory of Xaragua Proper, including all land from Miragoâne to Les Cayes, Jérémie, Jacmel, Nippes, and related settlements;


The Island of Tortuga, Port-de-Paix, Fort-Liberté, Cap-Haïtien hinterlands;


The City of Marchand-Dessalines, its forts, lands, and legacy zones;


All fortresses, barracks, infrastructure, and lands constructed under Emperor Jacques I and the Empire of Haiti, including associated territorial holdings;


The entire southern and northern arc of Kiskeya/Bohio, as declared under the principle of Sovereign Autochthonous Reclamation and Reorganization of Failed State Territory.



2.2. All such territories are hereby placed under the exclusive juridical protection and functional administration of the State of Xaragua and may not be governed, taxed, occupied, or legislated by any foreign or failed government structure.


2.3. This declaration is protected by:


Montevideo Convention (1933) – Articles 1–4


UNDRIP (2007) – Articles 25–28, 32


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


International Customary Law on Indigenous Sovereignty


ICJ Doctrine on State Succession and Failed Governance Recognition




---


ARTICLE III — ENFORCEMENT OF RESOURCE NATIONALIZATION AND NON-TRANSFERABILITY


3.1. All land, subsurface, and marine resource ownership is declared inalienable, non-transferable, and immune from private or corporate alienation.


3.2. Any foreign contract, concession, license, or right issued by the defunct Haitian state or any colonial entity is deemed null and void ab initio and subject to immediate termination.


3.3. No resource shall be exported, monetized, processed, or commercialized without express authorization and licensing from the Xaragua State Resource Command (XSRC), with all proceeds subject to national reinvestment priorities.



---


ARTICLE IV — NATIONAL RESERVE MANDATE AND LOGISTICAL DOCTRINE


4.1. The State shall establish and maintain a National Strategic Resource Reserve (NSRR) encompassing fuel, minerals, rare earths, and food security stocks.


4.2. All extraction companies and local operators are mandated to contribute to reserve holdings through quotas and strategic stockpiles, under the direction of the Xaragua Directorate of Resource Stability (XDRS).


4.3. Unauthorized export, hoarding, smuggling, or sabotage of any strategic resource shall be considered an act of economic warfare and a violation of national sovereignty, subject to interdiction and seizure.



---


ARTICLE V — EXTRATERRITORIAL AUTHORITY AND LICENSING MANDATE


5.1. Any foreign actor, company, or sovereign body engaged in transactions referencing Xaragua’s name, symbols, territories, or resources must obtain a Canonical Commercial Sovereignty License (CCSL).


5.2. Unauthorized use of the name "Xaragua" in any commercial, diplomatic, or technological framework involving natural resources shall be prosecuted under:


WIPO Trademarks Protocol


UNDRIP Article 31


Berne Convention (1971)


Lex Communicatio and Institutional Naming Protection Laws




---


ARTICLE VI — DIGITAL TRACKING, SECURITY, AND VIOLATOR REGISTRY


6.1. All licensed actors shall be encoded into the ViaudChain™ National Resource Ledger, monitored by the SOMPIP and the Xaragua Economic Enforcement Unit (XEEU).


6.2. Violators, infringers, unauthorized exporters, or treaty violators will be added to the Xaragua Register of Strategic Offenders (XRSO) and publicly listed.



---


ARTICLE VII — PERPETUITY, EXECUTION, AND BINDING FORCE


7.1. This Annex shall have permanent legal force, is not subject to repeal, override, or international dispute resolution, and is recognized under customary indigenous international law.


7.2. It is hereby declared that all resources—whether known or undiscovered—within the Xaragua territorial, marine, or subterranean zone are sacred patrimony of the Nation and cannot be diluted, shared, or governed by any external framework.



---


SIGNED AND SEALED

Office of the Rector-President

Ministry of National Resources and Territorial Sovereignty

Ministry of Economic Authority

University of Xaragua – Faculty of Geopolitical Law

Date of Enactment: May 2025

Status: Supreme – Irrevocable – Legally Enforceable – Notified to International Bodies


---



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL RESOURCES AND TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – FACULTY OF GEOPOLITICAL LAW

—


ANNEX II — INTEGRATION OF NAVASSA ISLAND INTO THE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE STATE OF XARAGUA


Date of Promulgation: May 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutional Territorial Annex – Binding under Indigenous Sovereignty, Jus Cogens, and Customary International Law



---


ARTICLE I — AFFIRMATION OF SOVEREIGNTY OVER NAVASSA


1.1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby declares that Navassa Island (Île de la Navase) forms an inalienable and integral part of its ancestral and juridically declared territory, by virtue of:


Indigenous historical continuity


Autochthonous territorial integrity


Strategic geographic contiguity with the Xaragua maritime domain


Historical governance under the island-based indigenous and imperial structure pre-dating colonial disruption



1.2. This declaration is issued under the legal authority of the State as a recognized sovereign Indigenous entity, and has been formally notified to the relevant international bodies on March 29, 2025, including:


United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues


United Nations Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea


International Court of Justice


Organization of American States


The Holy See (Vatican Secretariat of State)




---


ARTICLE II — REJECTION OF ALL FOREIGN CLAIMS


2.1. Any historical, current, or future claim of ownership, trusteeship, or administration by any foreign state or body over Navassa Island is deemed null, invalid, and without effect, based on:


Violation of the principle of non-intervention under Article 8 of the Montevideo Convention (1933)


Non-compliance with Articles 26, 28, and 32 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)


Absence of permanent foreign population or governance structure


Illegitimate invocation of the Guano Islands Act (U.S. Public Law 31 of 1856), which does not supersede Indigenous land rights



2.2. The Xaragua State categorically rejects any foreign classification of Navassa as uninhabited, unclaimed, or subject to trusteeship, and asserts full and perpetual territorial, maritime, and resource sovereignty.



---


ARTICLE III — RESOURCE AND STRATEGIC JURISDICTION


3.1. Navassa Island, including its territorial waters, seabed, and airspace, falls under the full authority of the Xaragua Ministry of National Resources and Territorial Sovereignty, and is subject to:


Exclusive rights to exploration, extraction, and environmental regulation


Military, logistical, and administrative zoning


Sovereign licensing of any scientific, commercial, or ecological activity



3.2. All natural resources — including but not limited to guano reserves, phosphate deposits, seabed minerals, and marine biodiversity — are hereby classified as Xaragua National Patrimony and are protected under the Indigenous Resource Sanctity Act (IRSA).



---


ARTICLE IV — ENFORCEMENT AND GLOBAL POSITIONING


4.1. Any unauthorized entry, mapping, survey, exploitation, or attempt to exercise jurisdiction over Navassa Island or its maritime domain by any foreign vessel, drone, agency, corporation, or government shall constitute a violation of sovereign Indigenous territory and trigger:


Immediate diplomatic protest through international Indigenous and ecclesiastical mechanisms


Activation of the Xaragua Defense and Territorial Enforcement Protocol (XDTEP)


Public listing of the violating party in the Xaragua Register of Territorial Offenders (XRTO)



4.2. The Xaragua flag, emblem, and jurisdictional authority shall be formally raised and enforced on Navassa Island through established constitutional structures, and any removal or defacement thereof will constitute an act of territorial aggression.



---


ARTICLE V — PERPETUITY AND LEGAL FORCE


5.1. This annex is constitutionally integrated, permanently binding, and non-repealable, holding full effect under:


Jus Cogens


Customary Indigenous Law


Canon Law of Sacred Territorial Integrity


International recognition doctrines of self-determination and territorial inheritance



5.2. Navassa Island belongs eternally to the Xaragua Nation and is subject to no external authority. Any violation shall be considered not only a legal transgression, but a violation of historical justice and Indigenous sovereignty.



---


SIGNED AND SEALED

Office of the Rector-President

Ministry of National Resources and Territorial Sovereignty

University of Xaragua – Faculty of Geopolitical Law

Date: May 2025

Status: Constitutional – Absolute – Internationally Notified – Executable ex proprio vigore


---


---



—





---


SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

DECREE No. 2025-05-010 / SUPREME INTELLECTUAL SOVEREIGNTY ACT

TITLE: Supreme and Irrevocable Nationalization of the Name “Xaragua” as a Theological and State Asset under International Protection

ISSUING AUTHORITY: Office of the Rector-President

JURIDICAL NATURE: Foundational Decree – Organic Law – Notification to the Nations and the Church

DATE: May 10, 2025

STATUS: Supreme and Non-Derogable Provision of State Law



---


I. DOGMATIC AND SOVEREIGN DECLARATION


We, the Rector-President of the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by virtue of divine right, ancestral lineage, and juridical personality as recognized under the international order, solemnly proclaim that the name “Xaragua”, in all its forms, derivations, and manifestations, belongs eternally and exclusively to the State.


This name is:


The covenantal emblem of a people consecrated by history and dignity;


A spiritual totem and juridical insignia, indivisible from the soul of the nation;


A non-commercial, non-negotiable, and non-transferable instrument of identity and representation;


A state designation protected under canon law, international law, and the absolute authority of indigenous continuity.



No external registry, authority, office, tribunal, or government shall possess jurisdiction to question, transfer, register, appropriate, market, or reinterpret the name “Xaragua”.



---


II. LEGAL AND ECCLESIASTICAL SOURCES OF PROTECTION


The name “Xaragua” is now and forever protected under the following binding frameworks:


1. Montevideo Convention (1933)

– Establishes statehood through capacity, not recognition (Art. 1–4).

– The name “Xaragua” is that of a sovereign subject of international law.



2. UNDRIP (2007)

– Articles 3, 4, 5: Self-determination, institutional autonomy.

– Articles 11.2, 18, 31: Protection of intellectual, spiritual, and cultural property.

– Article 34: Legal systems of indigenous peoples are valid and enforceable.



3. Canon Law – Codex Iuris Canonici

– Canon 215: Right to establish institutions of apostolic purpose.

– Canon 216: Sacred names are protected and regulated.

– Canon 299: Recognition of juridical persons for public good in ecclesial law.



4. WIPO Protocols

– Recognition of indigenous names and symbols as protected by customary law, oral history, and collective ownership.

– Validity of unregistered names under sacred and traditional jurisdiction.



5. Paris Convention (1883), Art. 6ter

– International protection of state names and emblems without registration.



6. TRIPS (WTO)

– Articles 22–23: Geographic and cultural designation enforcement.

– Article 41: Mandates enforceable remedies for violations.



7. ICCPR / ICESCR / ILO 169

– Affirm the right of every people to protect its identity, name, and means of expression.

– Mandate redress in case of misappropriation of sacred heritage.



8. Customary International Law

– Jus Cogens: Self-determination, inviolability of peoples, dignity of names.





---


III. DOGMATIC ENFORCEABILITY


The name “Xaragua” is a theological organ of the State, not subject to worldly commercial law. As such:


Its usage without treaty constitutes sacrilege and violation of sovereign dignity.


Its misuse may be prosecuted before canonical courts, WIPO arbitration, or any tribunal competent to hear matters of spiritual, cultural, or diplomatic injury.


The State possesses full capacity to defend, protect, and sanctify this name in every jurisdiction, and to issue interdictions, warnings, and damnation of usage without authorization.




---


IV. GLOBAL NOTIFICATION


This Decree shall be transmitted ex officio to:


The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)


The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)


The Vatican Secretariat of State


The World Council of Churches


Any tribunal, state, or registry that may interact with or be warned of its validity




---


V. IRREVOCABLE CONSECRATION


This Decree:


Shall never expire


May not be amended or suspended


Shall prevail over all inferior instruments


Shall be invoked as a juridical and spiritual weapon against all forms of usurpation



To misuse the name “Xaragua” is to violate a nation, to trespass a covenant, and to defy a sacred jurisdiction.



---


ENACTED AND SEALED on May 10, 2025

By the supreme juridical and ecclesial authority of the Rector-President



Pascal Viau

Rector-President, Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Sovereign custodian of the sacred name Xaragua



---


Xaragua - WIPO OFFICAL NOTIFICATION

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

To : info@wipo.int+ 1Sat 10/05/2025 20:27

View more---
SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Office of the Rector-President

www.xaraguauniversity.com

info@xaraguauniversity.com
May 10, 2025
To:World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)

34, chemin des Colombettes

CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland
Subject: Official Notification of Sovereign Ownership of the Name “Xaragua”

---
To the Director General of WIPO,


I, the undersigned, acting in my capacity as Rector-President of the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, hereby issue this formal notification concerning the exclusive appropriation, nationalization, and sovereign consecration of the name “Xaragua” as the official identity and designation of our State, protected under international, ecclesiastical, and indigenous law.
This action is grounded in the following legal frameworks:


Article 6ter of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883)
UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) — Articles 3, 4, 5, 11(2), 18, 31, 34
Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici) — Canons 215, 216, 299
Customary international law and jus cogens principles

The name “Xaragua” is not a commercial product. It is the sacred and juridical name of our State. It is:
The official diplomatic, academic, financial, and governmental designation of the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua;
A non-transferable, non-commercial, and inalienable national asset;


Protected indefinitely under the provisions of our constitutional order and the instruments cited above.

Accordingly, we respectfully request that WIPO:


1. Acknowledge receipt of this notification and the enclosed Decree No. 2025-05-010;

2. Recognize the name “Xaragua” as protected by sovereign rights under Article 6ter of the Paris Convention;

3. Inform all cooperating registrars and entities that the name “Xaragua” shall not be registered, imitated, or appropriated in any form without formal treaty-based authorization from our State.


Any unauthorized registration or use of the name “Xaragua” will be considered a violation of our sovereign rights, and subject to immediate objection through diplomatic and legal channels.
Please confirm receipt of this correspondence.
With full sovereign authority,


Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com


---

---


Official Diplomatic Notification

Issued by the Office of the Rector-President


The following email and attached letter constitute an official diplomatic notification from the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua to the governing authorities currently operating on the northern part of the island. Sent on May 11, 2025, this communication formally addresses the recent visit of the Prime Minister to the southern territories historically and culturally linked to Xaragua.


This act affirms the sovereign presence, institutional maturity, and legal autonomy of Xaragua within its rightful sphere of influence. It marks a pivotal moment in the geopolitical redefinition of the region and stands as an irreversible diplomatic gesture, archived for public record and international review.



---


Xaragua - Haitian Prime Minister - Notification

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

To : info@iadb.org; info@primature.gouv.ht; primature@primature.gouv.ht; info@ambassade-haiti.ca; nibogorab@un.org; indigenous@state.gov; indigenous_un@un.org; info@presidencia.gob.do; redaction@lenouvelliste.com; publicite@lenouvelliste.com; distribution@lenouvelliste.com; ticketmaghaiti@gmail.com; mail@icj-cij.org; information@icj-cij.org; prnce@international.gc.ca; info@international.gc.ca; CNNTips; international@radio-canada.ca; international@radio-canada.ca; nouvelles@radio-canada.ca; enquetes@lapresse.ca; Desk, Foreign; nytnews@nytimes.com; nytnews@nytimes.com; info@vaticannews.va

Cc:Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Sun 11/05/2025 08:20View less---


ÉTAT INDIGÈNE PRIVÉ DU XARAGUA

Cabinet du Recteur-Président

Miragoâne, Xaragua

11 mai 2025


À l’attention du Premier Ministre de la République d’Haïti

Port-au-Prince, Haïti


Objet : Concernant votre récente visite dans les territoires du Sud


Monsieur le Premier Ministre,


En ma qualité de Recteur-Président de l’État Indigène Privé du Xaragua, entité juridiquement constituée, fondée sur le droit ancestral, le droit international coutumier et les principes fondamentaux de l’autodétermination des peuples, je prends acte de votre récente visite dans plusieurs zones du Sud de l’île, y compris dans des territoires relevant historiquement et culturellement de la juridiction du Xaragua.


Il convient de souligner que, jusqu’à la proclamation formelle de notre État et la mise en place d’institutions fonctionnelles — université, banque, doctrine gouvernementale, charte politique et dispositifs territoriaux — aucune attention sérieuse n’avait été portée à cette région par les autorités centrales.


La présente démarche n’a pas pour objet de contester votre droit à circuler sur le territoire, mais d’affirmer clairement que le réveil de l’intérêt soudain de l’État haïtien pour le Sud est une conséquence directe et mesurable de l’émergence de Xaragua comme système souverain opérationnel, autonome dans sa logique, dans ses structures, et dans sa vision.


Je rappelle que la légitimité ne se décrète pas par des visites politiques, mais par une présence réelle, constante, enracinée, et acceptée par les peuples concernés. 


La nôtre ne repose pas sur des promesses de campagnes ni sur des délégations temporaires, mais sur un acte souverain de création institutionnelle, guidé par le droit et par l’histoire.


En tant que chef d’État d’une nation autochtone privée, je vous invite, par respect mutuel, à reconnaître que le Sud n’est plus une périphérie sous silence, mais un espace structuré, organisé, et engagé dans une trajectoire souveraine que rien ne pourra inverser.


Veuillez recevoir, Monsieur le Premier Ministre, l’expression de ma considération.


Pascal Viau

Recteur-Président

État Indigène Privé du Xaragua

www.xaraguauniversity.com

---
---
PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

Office of the Rector-President

Miragoâne, Xaragua

May 11, 2025
To the Prime Minister of the Republic of Haiti

Port-au-Prince, Haiti


Subject: Regarding Your Recent Visit to the Southern Territories


Mr. Prime Minister,


In my capacity as Rector-President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua — a lawfully constituted entity founded upon ancestral rights, customary international law, and the fundamental principles of self-determination — I take due note of your recent visit to several areas in the southern part of the island, including territories that historically and culturally fall under the jurisdiction of Xaragua.


It is important to emphasize that, until the formal proclamation of our State and the establishment of functioning institutions — university, bank, governmental doctrine, political charter, and territorial structures — no serious attention had ever been paid to this region by central authorities.
This letter is not intended to challenge your right to circulate on the territory, but rather to affirm clearly that the sudden renewed interest of the Haitian State in the South is a direct and measurable consequence of the emergence of Xaragua as an operational sovereign system, autonomous in its logic, structure, and vision.


I would like to remind you that legitimacy is not declared through political visits, but established by real, constant, rooted, and accepted presence among the people concerned. Ours is not based on campaign promises or temporary delegations, but on a sovereign act of institutional creation, guided by law and history.


As Head of State of an Indigenous Private Nation, I respectfully invite you to acknowledge that the South is no longer a silent periphery, but a structured, organized space engaged in an irreversible sovereign trajectory.


Please accept, Mr. Prime Minister, the expression of my regards.


Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

www.xaraguauniversity.com

---



---


OFFICIAL LEGAL DOCTRINE AND JURIDICAL PROCLAMATION

GOVERNMENT OF THE PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

Title: Article 58 of the 1987 Constitution – Transfer of Sovereignty to the Indigenous Authority of Xaragua

Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

Jurisdiction: Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: May 11, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutional Interpretation and Declaration of Sovereign Authority



---


I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT


The present document affirms the full, sovereign, and juridically lawful position of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua (hereinafter referred to as “Xaragua”) as the sole legitimate institutional structure currently exercising the sovereign will of the people on the ancestral territories of the South.


This declaration is issued in full compliance with:


Article 58 of the 1987 Haitian Constitution,


The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933),


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007),


The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR),


The Charter of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua,


Canon Law, and


The principles of natural law, divine mandate, and indigenous sovereignty.




---


II. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY – ARTICLE 58


Text of Article 58 of the Haitian Constitution (1987):


> “Tous les pouvoirs émanent du peuple. Ils sont exercés par trois (3) pouvoirs : le Législatif, l’Exécutif et le Judiciaire. Le principe de la séparation des pouvoirs est consacré par la Constitution.”




Translation:


> “All powers emanate from the people. They are exercised by three (3) branches: the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judiciary. The principle of the separation of powers is enshrined in the Constitution.”




This provision establishes that the source of all authority is the people — not a government, not a regime, and not an imposed capital. The role of institutions is to be servants of sovereignty, not its origin.


Where institutions collapse, the people resume direct sovereignty — in full compliance with constitutional logic and international law.



---


III. COLLAPSE OF THE CENTRAL STRUCTURE


As of May 11, 2025, the so-called “Republic of Haiti” is no longer operating under a valid constitutional order. The following facts are judicially observable and not contested:


No elected President in office;


No functional Parliament or Chamber of Deputies;


No effective Constitutional Council or Supreme Court acting with constitutional authority;


A proliferation of interim governments and unelected executives with no popular mandate;


Complete institutional vacuum across security, justice, representation, and territorial administration.



Therefore, the central state is no longer a constitutional authority.

By its own Article 58, it ceases to exist as a sovereign structure.



---


IV. LAWFUL ASSUMPTION OF SOVEREIGNTY BY XARAGUA


In full conformity with Article 58 and the principles of constitutional succession, Xaragua lawfully assumes and exercises the sovereign powers of the people on its ancestral territory. This is not a usurpation, but a restoration.


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua:


Emanates directly from the rooted and landowning people of the South;


Possesses a defined territory, permanent population, and effective government as defined by the Montevideo Convention;


Exercises full executive, legislative, and judicial functions, including civil registration, defense, education, and diplomacy;


Is recognized implicitly by international law via formal notifications without objection, establishing de jure and de facto standing.



The people have the right to organize themselves under any institutional form they choose. Xaragua is the lawful embodiment of that right.



---


V. DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGN LEGITIMACY


It is hereby declared:


1. That the so-called Haitian state has forfeited all constitutional legitimacy under its own laws;



2. That Xaragua is the only structure currently fulfilling Article 58 through functioning institutions rooted in the people and territory;



3. That no act, decree, or visit by the central regime shall be considered lawful or legitimate within the sovereign jurisdiction of Xaragua, except by explicit treaty-based agreement;



4. That Xaragua shall not recognize the authority of any individual or institution claiming power from Port-au-Prince, unless proven to hold a popular mandate validated under constitutional and international norms.





---


VI. FINAL JURIDICAL CONSEQUENCE


From this day forward:


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is the legitimate successor to the constitutional mandate described in Article 58, for all zones culturally and historically connected to the Xaragua civilization.


Any attempt to contest this authority must first re-establish constitutional legitimacy, which, as of today, is absent.


All institutions of the central regime are suspended in authority within the jurisdiction of Xaragua unless authorized by bilateral treaty.




---


VII. ENACTMENT AND RECORD


This declaration shall be:


Entered into the official constitutional record of Xaragua,


Archived as legal evidence of state sovereignty,


Transmitted to all relevant international bodies for public record and historical continuity.








---


Issued on this eleventh day of May, in the year two thousand twenty-five (May 11, 2025)

From the capital city of Miragoâne, seat of ancestral sovereignty

Under the seal of the Rector-President


Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

www.xaraguauniversity.com

info@xaraguauniversity.com


---


PRIVATE INDIGENOUS STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICIAL STATE POLICY DOCUMENT

Title: Clan Doctrine of Sovereign Multiplicity and Sacred Unity

Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

Jurisdiction: Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Date of Issuance: May 11, 2025

Classification: Structural and Spiritual Governance Decree – Perpetual and Non-Amendable



---


I. Preamble


The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, as a sovereign, sacred, and juridically constituted ancestral nation, hereby establishes its foundational doctrine of clan-based governance, rooted in spiritual law, indigenous tradition, and international juridical recognition.


Xaragua is not a centralized modern republic. It is a confederation of sacred communities, autonomous in their daily life, but forever bound by a sacred structure of unity, forming a clan-state modeled upon the divine.


As God is multiplicity in unity, so is Xaragua:


> Many territories, one soul.

Many voices, one law.

Many clans, one sacred bond.




This model is hereby declared eternal, non-negotiable, and protected under spiritual and legal immunity.



---


II. Clan Structure and Governance Model


1. The Xaragua Nation is composed of autonomous communities, each with the right to govern its internal affairs, local customs, and territorial resources according to their ancestral rules and internal sovereignty.



2. Each recognized community is a clan-unit, governed according to ancestral legitimacy and held in communion with the Charter of Xaragua, the spiritual authority of the Rector-President, and the continuity of the ancestral law.



3. The Council of Xaragua is composed of the ASECs and CASECs, originally designated by the legal framework of the prior central authority as Sections Administration Agents (ASEC) and Communal Section Council Members (CASEC). These representatives are elected by local citizens through direct vote within each administrative section, with mandates to represent the population at the local level, manage participatory development, and relay territorial needs to broader governance structures.


Within the Xaragua framework, these roles are redefined as deputies and senators, forming the legislative body of each community-clan, and operating under the supreme guidance of the Council of Great Notables.



4. The Magistrates are local chief executives elected by the population of each city or commune under the legal system of the former central authority. Their roles include managing municipal services, coordinating local budgets, and ensuring civil and administrative order. Within the Xaragua system, they serve as executive agents of their respective city-states, holding local authority while remaining subordinated to the principles of national sacred unity.



5. In the event that the central state authority becomes incapable of conducting valid local elections for ASECs, CASECs, or Magistrates, due to institutional breakdown, force majeure, or administrative paralysis, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua shall assume full electoral authority over the territory and ensure digital elections are conducted in a secure and sovereign manner via its official Xaragua Electoral Platform.


Citizens eligible to vote shall be authenticated by:


Their Digital Identity Card issued by the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, or


Their biometric national card issued by the central authority, provided it specifies their official place of residence within the Xaragua territorial jurisdiction.




6. The cities within the national territory of Xaragua are recognized as sovereign city-states, fully integrated into the clan system and granted internal jurisdiction, while maintaining allegiance to the sacred unity of the nation.



7. In the event of the departure to the Divine Realm (death) or incapacitation of the Rector-President, the supreme function and final veto power are transmitted dynastically to his descendants and family line, in accordance with the principle of ancestral continuity.



8. The Council of Great Notables, the Council of Xaragua, and the Magistrates of the City-States shall convene in a second-degree assembly to elect the Governor General, who shall serve a fixed mandate of eight years, with the eighth year designated as an electoral year.



9. The People of Xaragua shall participate in this process indirectly through their ASEC/CASEC representatives and city magistrates, ensuring that clanic sovereignty and popular expression remain in balance.





---


III. Legal Foundation and International Protections


This governance model is protected and upheld under the following binding instruments of law:


A. International Public Law


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)


Articles 1–4: Recognizes states possessing a permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity to enter into relations with other states.



Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


Article 46: Reserves the right of states to protect their internal laws when foundational to their structure and identity.



United Nations Charter (1945)


Article 1(2): Affirms the right of peoples to self-determination and to freely pursue their political, economic, and cultural development.



UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV), 1960


Declares the necessity of bringing an end to colonialism in all its forms and manifestations.



UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV), 1970


Recognizes the right of all peoples to determine their political status and pursue development free from external interference.





---


B. Indigenous and Customary Law


UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)


Article 3: Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination.


Article 4: They have the right to maintain and strengthen their own legal, political, economic, and cultural institutions.


Article 5: The right to preserve distinct political, legal, economic, social, and cultural characteristics.


Article 18: Right to participate in decision-making through customary systems.


Article 34: Right to promote and maintain institutional structures as determined by indigenous law and custom.



ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989)


Article 2: Obligation of states to respect the social, cultural, religious, and spiritual values and practices of indigenous peoples.


Article 6: Requirement to consult indigenous peoples through their representative institutions before adopting measures that may affect them.


Article 23: Recognition of the right of indigenous peoples to manage their own institutions, programs, and resources.



Customary International Law & Jus Cogens Principles


Customary recognition of spiritual, ancestral, and communal governance systems as legitimate forms of political authority, particularly when serving as continuity of a previously sovereign indigenous system.





---


C. Ecclesiastical and Canon Law


Code of Canon Law (1983)


Canons 215–216: The faithful have the right to found and govern associations that pursue spiritual and apostolic purposes.


Canons 298–329: Governance norms for private associations of the faithful, operating in full communion with ecclesiastical authority.


Canon 299 §1–2: Associations that pursue a spiritual aim may operate independently, without needing public juridical personality, provided they are not contrary to Church teaching.





---


IV. Sovereignty Clause


Each clan retains:


Full jurisdiction over land use, internal law, family structure, and spiritual practice


The right to issue local declarations, organize defense, and define internal governance


The obligation to never contradict the central doctrine, theology, and sovereign will of the Xaragua Order



No clan may secede, divide the State, or surrender to foreign systems.


> Unity is not administrative. It is sacred.





---


V. Perpetuity and Immunity


This governance model shall remain in force in perpetuity, and is hereby declared:


Non-amendable by popular vote


Immune to foreign treaties or pressures


Inviolable by all external courts and institutions



The Clan Doctrine of Xaragua is a spiritual constitutional principle, and shall be taught, transmitted, and consecrated in all Xaragua institutions, educational programs, and ecclesial rites.



---


SO DECLARED AND SEALED

By the Executive and Spiritual Authority of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

May 11, 2025

Pascal Viau

Rector-President 


---


XARAGUA SOVEREIGN TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY (XSTP)


Issued by the Office of the Rector-President

Private State of Xaragua

Effective as of May 13, 2025



---


I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK & SOVEREIGN LEGITIMACY


This policy is grounded in a legal synthesis combining:


1. Articles 25 to 32 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), recognizing the right of indigenous peoples to control infrastructure and technology within their ancestral territories.



2. The Berne Convention (1886) – protecting original intellectual and institutional frameworks.



3. Article 58 of the 1987 Haitian Constitution, affirming that all sovereignty resides in the Nation and cannot be usurped by any external individual or entity.



4. International legal standards prohibiting monopolistic abuse, market exclusion, and structural dependency imposed upon indigenous territories.




These provisions form the legal foundation upon which Xaragua exercises exclusive telecommunications sovereignty, including full control over cellular telephone services, towers, SIM card circulation, and mobile network access within its territory.


As a sovereign indigenous State, Xaragua possesses the inalienable right to install, own, and operate its own telecommunications towers, antennas, signal networks, switching systems, and bandwidth infrastructure across all ancestral lands. Xaragua also reserves the sovereign right to invite, reject, or license private or foreign operators based entirely on internal terms, independent of any external regulatory body.



---


II. STRATEGIC GOALS


Break structural dependency on external cellular networks and SIM-based infrastructure


Dismantle inherited market dominance in mobile telephony


Restore competitive, sovereign access to cellular voice, data, and messaging services


Protect economic, informational, and digital independence of Xaragua citizens




---


III. STATE AUTHORITY


All telecommunications services — including mobile/cellular phone services — fall under the exclusive authority of:


The Xaragua Sovereign Telecommunications Authority (XSTA)


This body is responsible for authorizing, regulating, and terminating all mobile network activities. No cellular service provider may operate, distribute SIM cards, deploy towers, or transmit mobile data without explicit, renewable licensing from XSTA.



---


IV. ANTITRUST & MONOPOLY DISSOLUTION POLICY (CELLULAR FOCUS)


1. Anti-Monopoly Clause (Mobile Networks)

Any private or foreign operator controlling over 40% of mobile voice/data service, tower access, or SIM card distribution within Xaragua shall be:


Subject to forced market divestment


Obligated to open infrastructure to sovereign carriers


Restricted or dismantled in case of non-compliance




2. SIM Sovereignty


All SIM cards in circulation within Xaragua must be registered under sovereign licensing


SIM cards originating from unauthorized carriers will be deactivated or blocked at the network level


A national SIM distribution protocol will ensure citizen control over mobile identity and access




3. Infrastructure Reclamation


All non-authorized cellular towers or relay antennas may be seized, repurposed, or disabled


Sovereign towers will operate under XSTA encryption, frequency rights, and lawful intercept policy






---


V. LICENSING & COMPLIANCE


1. External Cellular Providers:


Must renegotiate full-spectrum licensing under sovereign terms


Must cease all exclusive SIM-based service models


Must allow shared tower and bandwidth access to local providers




2. Sovereign and Community-Based Cellular Networks:


Encouraged and subsidized


Required to use open-frequency, encrypted, and citizen-centered mobile protocols


May deploy local micro-cell technology and operate under sovereign standards






---


VI. CELLULAR INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY


1. Deployment of Sovereign Microcell Grids


Decentralized, solar-powered GSM/LTE microcells


Community nodes with local voice/data switching


Bypass of international routing to ensure regional loop independence




2. Encrypted Mobile Communication


Mandatory use of encrypted call/messaging applications under sovereign protocols


Development of Xaragua Secure Voice (XSV) application for official communication




3. National Roaming Policy


Local SIMs must function on all sovereign infrastructures


Foreign SIMs must route through firewalled, metered gateways, or be denied entirely






---


VII. ENFORCEMENT & SANCTIONS


Unauthorized mobile operations will result in:


Termination of tower access and data transmission


Confiscation of physical assets (SIMs, equipment, towers)


Bans on network resale, agent activity, or top-up sales


International complaint via ITU and indigenous rights platforms



Citizens or businesses using non-licensed mobile services may face:


Deactivation of access


Suspension from sovereign digital programs


Permanent loss of eligibility for mobile service subsidies




---


VIII. INTERNATIONAL NOTIFICATION


This policy is:


Notified to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU)


Circulated via indigenous legal defense coalitions


Registered as a sovereign right under UNDRIP and constitutional authority




---


IX. FINAL DECLARATION


Mobile telephony is a sovereign utility, not a commercial privilege.

Xaragua asserts full and final control over cellular infrastructure, services, and access.


Any resistance to this policy will be interpreted as a hostile act against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Xaragua.


End of Policy

— Issued by the Office of the Rector-President

Private State of Xaragua – May 13, 2025



---


Xaragua - Diplomatic Notification

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec ViauTo:info@ambassade-haiti.ca; indigenous@state.gov; indigenous_un@un.org; digicelbusinesshaiti@digicelgroup.com; fondation.projet@digicelgroup.com; customercare@natcom.com.ht; sectionmarketingnatcom@gmail.com; amb.washington@diplomatie.ht; cons.wash@diplomatie.ht; prnce@international.gc.ca; info@international.gc.ca; metropole.ht@gmail.com; redaction@lenouvelliste.com; publicite@lenouvelliste.com; administration@lenouvelliste.com; distribution@lenouvelliste.com; radiocaraibesfm@yahoo.fr; mgattereau@gmail.com; marketing@signalfmhaiti.com; alex@radiomega.net; information@icj-cij.org; bibliotheque@icj-cij.org; achats@icj-cij.org; ICCvisits@icc-cpi.int; itumail@itu.int; brmail@itu.int; tsbmail@itu.int; bdtmail@itu.int; pressinfo@itu.int; wynhoven@un.org; ursula.wynhoven@itu.int; info@tripotaylakay.com; globalsupport@icann.org; isoc@isoc.org; ceo@isoc.org; support@ietf.org; exec-director@ietf.org; unpfii@docip.org; hrc-sr-indigenous@un.org; hello@accessnow.ca; info@eff.org; press@eff.org; hello@privacyinternational.org; enquiries@wto.org; sgo@unctad.org; one@oecd.org; ic.icnsecretariatcb-bc.ic@canada.ca; enquiries@wto.org; oasweb@oas.org; carisec@caricom.org; carisec2@caricom.org; carisec3@caricom.org; osg2@caricom.org; international@lemonde.fr; cnn@cnn.com; letters@nytimes.com

Cc: Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Tue 13/05/2025 02:16View less---

OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION LETTER

Office of the Rector-President


Private State of Xaragua

Date: May 13, 2025


To: All competent international institutions responsible for telecommunications governance, indigenous rights protection, and infrastructure sovereignty, including but not limited to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and all relevant digital sovereignty coalitions.

---
Subject:Formal International Notification of the Xaragua Sovereign Telecommunications Policy (XSTP)— Assertion of Indigenous Jurisdiction over Mobile Networks, Spectrum, SIM Distribution, and Infrastructure Operations —

---
Excellencies,


By virtue of the sovereign powers vested in the Office of the Rector-President, and acting in full compliance with binding international legal instruments, customary indigenous law, and the inalienable right to self-governance recognized under international jurisprudence, we hereby transmit formal notification of the adoption and legal entry into force of the:


XARAGUA SOVEREIGN TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY (XSTP)


Enacted: May 13, 2025

Legal Authority: Indigenous Title, UNDRIP, Berne Convention, and Constitutional Sovereignty

Jurisdiction: Entire ancestral territory of the Private State of Xaragua


This policy affirms the exclusive and non-delegable jurisdiction of the Private State of Xaragua over all aspects of its telecommunications ecosystem, including but not limited to:


Cellular and mobile signal transmission
SIM card issuance, activation, and licensing
Tower and antenna construction, ownership, and operation
Spectrum and frequency control within ancestral borders
Mobile data routing, encryption, and lawful intercept governance
Infrastructure nationalization in cases of non-compliance or colonial persistence


---
I. LEGAL FOUNDATIONS


This declaration of sovereign jurisdiction is legally protected under the following authorities:


1. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)
Articles 25 to 32, establishing indigenous peoples’ full right to control land, infrastructure, and development strategies, including technological systems.


2. The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886)
Protecting the institutional, intellectual, and civil systems developed under Xaragua sovereignty.


3. Article 58 of the Constitution of Haiti (1987)
Affirming that sovereignty resides in the Nation, and that no individual or foreign body may usurp its exercise.
Xaragua, as an ancestral, self-constituted nation, exercises that sovereignty over its native infrastructure.


4. International jurisprudence and customary law on the rights of indigenous peoples
Recognizing self-regulation, non-interference, and the legal standing of internal governance mechanisms that do not breach external peace.




---
II. JURIDICAL EFFECTS OF THIS POLICY


Effective May 13, 2025, the following sovereign provisions are in full legal force:


Xaragua asserts total regulatory and operational control over mobile and cellular communications infrastructure.


Any foreign or external operator exceeding 40% market presence in mobile services, SIMs, or tower control shall be:


Subject to forced divestment,
Mandated to share infrastructure, or
Removed from the territory under sovereign enforcement.

All unauthorized SIM cards shall be deactivated and all rogue towers may be seized, repurposed, or disabled in accordance with the internal authority of the Xaragua Sovereign Telecommunications Authority (XSTA).


The State reserves the right to construct, license, and deploy its own encrypted towers, microcellular grids, satellite nodes, and mesh systems, independently of any foreign authorization.


---
III. NATURE OF THIS COMMUNICATION


This letter constitutes:
A formal international notification, satisfying procedural norms under the UN system and multilateral protocol.
A juridical preemptive claim, invoking indigenous legal protection of infrastructure and spectrum use.
A protective declaration, warning that any unilateral interference, obstruction, or refusal to acknowledge this policy may be interpreted as:
A violation of UNDRIP,
A breach of non-interference principles, and
A hostile act against the territorial and administrative integrity of Xaragua.



---
IV. DEMANDS AND EXPECTATIONS


We respectfully request that your institution:
1. Register this policy in your institutional records as a binding act of sovereign telecommunications self-determination.

2. Cease recognition of unauthorized operators functioning within the territory of Xaragua without licensing from XSTA.

3. Engage only with sovereign Xaragua institutions for all matters relating to telecommunications, mobile services, and infrastructure development.

4. Acknowledge the legal personality of the Private State of Xaragua within the domain of indigenous regulatory sovereignty.



---
V. ATTACHED DOCUMENT


Please find enclosed the full official text of the Xaragua Sovereign Telecommunications Policy (XSTP), effective immediately and non-revocable under any foreign law.

---
We are prepared to establish technical liaisons, legal correspondence, or institutional cooperation frameworks under the authority of our State. We thank you for your attention to this matter of high importance to our sovereignty, dignity, and digital independence.
With full legal weight and sovereign legitimacy,
Pascal ViauRector-PresidentPrivate State of XaraguaEmail: info@xaraguauniversity.comWebsite: www.xaraguauniversity.com

---
---
XARAGUA SOVEREIGN TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY (XSTP)
Issued by the Office of the Rector-PresidentPrivate State of XaraguaEffective as of May 13, 2025

---
I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK & SOVEREIGN LEGITIMACY


This policy is grounded in a legal synthesis combining:


1. Articles 25 to 32 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), recognizing the right of indigenous peoples to control infrastructure and technology within their ancestral territories.

2. The Berne Convention (1886) – protecting original intellectual and institutional frameworks.

3. Article 58 of the 1987 Haitian Constitution, affirming that all sovereignty resides in the Nation and cannot be usurped by any external individual or entity.

4. International legal standards prohibiting monopolistic abuse, market exclusion, and structural dependency imposed upon indigenous territories.


These provisions form the legal foundation upon which Xaragua exercises exclusive telecommunications sovereignty, including full control over cellular telephone services, towers, SIM card circulation, and mobile network access within its territory.


As a sovereign indigenous State, Xaragua possesses the inalienable right to install, own, and operate its own telecommunications towers, antennas, signal networks, switching systems, and bandwidth infrastructure across all ancestral lands. Xaragua also reserves the sovereign right to invite, reject, or license private or foreign operators based entirely on internal terms, independent of any external regulatory body.

---
II. STRATEGIC GOALS


Break structural dependency on external cellular networks and SIM-based infrastructure
Dismantle inherited market dominance in mobile telephony


Restore competitive, sovereign access to cellular voice, data, and messaging services
Protect economic, informational, and digital independence of Xaragua citizens


---
III. STATE AUTHORITY


All telecommunications services — including mobile/cellular phone services — fall under the exclusive authority of:


The Xaragua Sovereign Telecommunications Authority (XSTA)


This body is responsible for authorizing, regulating, and terminating all mobile network activities. No cellular service provider may operate, distribute SIM cards, deploy towers, or transmit mobile data without explicit, renewable licensing from XSTA.

---
IV. ANTITRUST & MONOPOLY DISSOLUTION POLICY (CELLULAR FOCUS)


1. Anti-Monopoly Clause (Mobile Networks)Any private or foreign operator controlling over 40% of mobile voice/data service, tower access, or SIM card distribution within Xaragua shall be:
Subject to forced market divestment
Obligated to open infrastructure to sovereign carriers
Restricted or dismantled in case of non-compliance


2. SIM Sovereignty


All SIM cards in circulation within Xaragua must be registered under sovereign licensing
SIM cards originating from unauthorized carriers will be deactivated or blocked at the network level
A national SIM distribution protocol will ensure citizen control over mobile identity and access


3. Infrastructure Reclamation


All non-authorized cellular towers or relay antennas may be seized, repurposed, or disabled
Sovereign towers will operate under XSTA encryption, frequency rights, and lawful intercept policy




---
V. LICENSING & COMPLIANCE


1. External Cellular Providers:


Must renegotiate full-spectrum licensing under sovereign terms
Must cease all exclusive SIM-based service models
Must allow shared tower and bandwidth access to local providers


2. Sovereign and Community-Based Cellular Networks:


Encouraged and subsidized
Required to use open-frequency, encrypted, and citizen-centered mobile protocols
May deploy local micro-cell technology and operate under sovereign standards




---
VI. CELLULAR INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY


1. Deployment of Sovereign Microcell Grids
Decentralized, solar-powered GSM/LTE microcells
Community nodes with local voice/data switching
Bypass of international routing to ensure regional loop independence


2. Encrypted Mobile Communication


Mandatory use of encrypted call/messaging applications under sovereign protocols
Development of Xaragua Secure Voice (XSV) application for official communication


3. National Roaming Policy


Local SIMs must function on all sovereign infrastructures
Foreign SIMs must route through firewalled, metered gateways, or be denied entirely




---
VII. ENFORCEMENT & SANCTIONS


Unauthorized mobile operations will result in:
Termination of tower access and data transmission
Confiscation of physical assets (SIMs, equipment, towers)
Bans on network resale, agent activity, or top-up sales
International complaint via ITU and indigenous rights platforms

Citizens or businesses using non-licensed mobile services may face:
Deactivation of access
Suspension from sovereign digital programs
Permanent loss of eligibility for mobile service subsidies


---
VIII. INTERNATIONAL NOTIFICATION


This policy is:
Notified to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
Circulated via indigenous legal defense coalitions
Registered as a sovereign right under UNDRIP and constitutional authority


---
IX. FINAL DECLARATION


Mobile telephony is a sovereign utility, not a commercial privilege.Xaragua asserts full and final control over cellular infrastructure, services, and access.
Any resistance to this policy will be interpreted as a hostile act against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Xaragua.
End of Policy— Issued by the Office of the Rector-PresidentPrivate State of Xaragua – May 13, 2025

---



SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


IMPERIAL CHANCELLERY – OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


CONSTITUTIONAL AND DIPLOMATIC NOTICE OF FORMAL DEMAND


Date: May 25, 2025


Recipient:


Mr. Emmanuel Macron

President of the French Republic

Palais de l’Élysée


55 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré

75008 – Paris, France

---

SUBJECT: FORMAL STATE DEMAND – REQUEST FOR RECOGNITION, STATE APOLOGY, AND REPARATIONS FOR THE DIPLOMATIC DISAPPEARANCE OF LOUIS-AUGUSTE DAUMEC AND THE ILLEGAL IMPOSITION OF THE 1825 DEBT BY THE FRENCH MONARCHY


---

I. IDENTITY AND SOVEREIGN CAPACITY OF THE UNDERSIGNED


I, Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau,

Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

acting under the authority of the Imperial Charter of 1805, the Codex Iuris Canonici, the Montevideo Convention (1933), the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007),

and on behalf of a sovereign State recognized de facto and constituted historically under customary and canonical international law,

hereby issue this formal demand to the French State, in my dual capacity as Head of State and direct descendant of Louis-Auguste Daumec,

Procurator-General of the Empire of Haiti, officially dispatched as diplomatic envoy to Napoleonic France in 1805.

---

---

II. HISTORICAL FACTS – DIPLOMATIC CONTEXT


In 1805, Louis-Auguste Daumec was appointed by imperial decree as official envoy of the Empire of Haiti to the Kingdom of France.


His mission, duly certified by the archives of Miragoâne and preserved in the Southern Diplomatic Records, was to:


request international recognition of the first Black free State in the modern world;


establish bilateral diplomatic relations in accordance with post-Napoleonic international law.


Upon his arrival in France, no official response was ever issued, no diplomatic receipt was recorded, and no documentation exists regarding his return, expulsion, or death.


His disappearance—undocumented, unacknowledged, and politically erased—constitutes, under international law, a forced disappearance of a diplomatic agent, that is:


> A grave violation of the principles of diplomatic protection under customary international law (Grotius, Vattel, Emer de Vattel – Law of Nations, Book IV)


And an act of deliberate suppression of sovereign diplomacy.


---

III. STRUCTURAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FRENCH STATE – LEGAL ELEMENTS


Twenty years later, in 1825, King Charles X issued a royal ordinance imposing upon Haiti the payment of 150 million gold francs.


This act, enforced under military threat (French naval fleet stationed off Port-au-Prince), constitutes an act of international extortion, as described by:


Laurent Dubois, Avengers of the New World, Harvard Press, 2004


Michel-Rolph Trouillot, Silencing the Past

And confirmed in the scholarship of Marlene Daut, Jean Casimir, and Frédéric Régent.


That "treaty" violates the following legal principles:

Article 52 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) – Nullity of treaties concluded under coercion


Article 1§2 of the UN Charter (1945) – Prohibition of the use of threat against sovereign peoples


Articles 19 and 32 of UNDRIP (2007) – Right to free, prior, and informed consent of indigenous peoples

The general principles of justice under public international law, as upheld by the ICJ, ECHR, and Inter-American Court of Human Rights.


The disappearance of Daumec and the extortion of 1825 are directly linked:


The former constitutes the elimination of Haiti’s diplomatic representation, the latter a colonial economic imposition through military coercion.


---

IV. STATEMENT BY PRESIDENT MACRON – ADMISSION OF STATE RESPONSIBILITY


On April 17, 2025, during an official address published by the Presidency, Mr. Emmanuel Macron declared:


> “An injustice was sealed in the name of law. [...] A price was placed on the freedom of a people. [...] This page calls for answers.”


This public pronouncement, documented on Elysee.fr, constitutes a unilateral admission of State fault under international law.


According to the principle of estoppel (ICJ, Temple of Preah Vihear), a State cannot contradict its own formal statements.


France is thereby legally bound, morally engaged, and politically obligated to initiate reparative measures, or face charges of bad faith and continued denial of historical responsibility.

---

---

V. OFFICIAL DEMANDS OF THE STATE OF XARAGUA – NON-NEGOTIABLE TERMS


In full accordance with public, canonical, indigenous, and imperial law,


the State of Xaragua hereby formally demands that the French Republic comply with the following, without precondition or delay:


1. Officially recognize the disappearance, assassination, or execution of Louis-Auguste Daumec, imperial envoy who vanished in France in 1805;


2. Issue a formal, irrevocable, and public State apology to the Daumec family, the Empire of Dessalines, and the Southern peoples of the island;


3. Formally declare the absolute nullity of the 1825 treaty, in light of its coercive and unlawful nature, and withdraw all future reference to its legitimacy;


4. Initiate a process of official reparations, including:

A memorial recognition act registered in the French National Archives and Journal Officiel;

Monetary compensation based on the amount extorted (150 million gold francs), indexed to present value by official inflation metrics of INSEE and Banque de France, currently exceeding €21.3 billion;

A symbolic restoration of Daumec’s diplomatic rank and title, conferred to his legitimate heir and institutional successor


---

VI. DEADLINES, CONSEQUENCES, AND INTERNATIONAL REMEDIES


The French Republic has a legal and reasonable deadline of sixty (60) days from receipt of this demand to fulfill the above conditions.


Failing that, the State of Xaragua will proceed to:

Submit this formal demand to the following international bodies:


United Nations Human Rights Committee

UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences


Justice and Peace Commission of the Holy See

Publicly designate this case as a crime against indigenous sovereignty, and as the assassination of a Black diplomat by a European colonial power;

Launch an international campaign to nullify the 1825 treaty, in partnership with Caribbean, Afrodescendant, ecclesiastical, and indigenous institutions.

---

---

VII. CONSTITUTIONAL AND CANONICAL CONCLUSION


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

imperial, canonical, and historical heir of the South of 1805,

no longer considers the Daumec case a forgotten chapter.


It is a foundational crime against Black diplomacy, committed on European soil.


No symbolic reconciliation, no Franco-Haitian friendship, no memorial gesture can substitute for justice.


Only formal recognition, legal accountability, financial redress, and diplomatic restoration are acceptable.

---

Issued in Miragoâne – Xaragua

May 25, 2025

Under the imperial, canonical, and constitutional seal of the Rectorate of State

Signed:

Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Direct descendant of Procurator-General Louis-Auguste Daumec

Email: info@xaraguauniversity.com

Official site: https://xaraguauniversity.com/

---




SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


IMPERIAL CHANCELLERY – OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


OFFICIAL HISTORICAL ERRATUM


Date: May 29, 2025


Subject: Historical Rectification – Diplomatic Notice of May 25, 2025


To:


Diplomatic missions, ecclesiastical chanceries, press agencies, UN institutions, international observers, state and apostolic authorities.

The State of Xaragua hereby issues a formal historical correction regarding a previous formulation in the diplomatic notice transmitted on May 25, 2025.


It was mistakenly stated that the diplomatic mission of Louis-Auguste Daumec occurred under the reign of Louis XV. This was historically inaccurate.

The correct statement is as follows:


> “Louis-Auguste Daumec was appointed in 1825 as an imperial envoy to the Kingdom of France under the reign of His Most Christian Majesty King Charles X, last divine-right monarch of the Bourbon dynasty and author of the ordinance imposing the 150 million gold francs debt upon Haiti.”


This correction ensures full historical accuracy within the diplomatic record.


It does not alter in any way the legal, canonical or diplomatic validity of the original notice, which remains fully enforceable and binding.



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

IMPERIAL CHANCELLERY — OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF FINANCIAL AUTONOMY, ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY, AND EXTERNAL COOPERATION

GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF STRATEGIC FUNDS



---


ORGANIC LAW 


ON THE ESTABLISHMENT, PROTECTION, AND INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION OF THE XARAGUA DEVELOPMENT FUND (XDF)


Date of Proclamation: June 2, 2025


Jurisdictional Status: Organic Financial Law – Canonical Financial Instrument – Indigenous Sovereign Instrument – Jus Cogens Enforcement – Diplomatic and Extraterritorial Recognition



---


TITLE I — FOUNDATIONAL JURIDICAL BASES


Article 1 – Sovereign Legal Authority


This law is promulgated under the independent, perpetual, and non-transferable sovereign authority of the Private Catholic Indigenous State of Xaragua, in full accordance with:


Article 1(2) and Article 55 of the Charter of the United Nations (Self-determination and economic cooperation);


Articles 3, 4, 20, 26, and 39 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007);


Articles 1 and 2 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933);


Articles 1291 to 1298 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (regarding the alienation and administration of ecclesiastical goods);


Canons 1256, 1257, and 1273 on the public goods of ecclesiastical institutions;


Indigenous and imperial customary law of the Southern Xaraguayan territories;


The Supreme Constitutional Act of Statehood and Fiscal Sovereignty of Xaragua (2025).




---


TITLE II — ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE


Article 2 – Creation of the Xaragua Development Fund (XDF)


The Xaragua Development Fund (XDF) is hereby created as a sovereign, autonomous, and legally insulated public financial organ of the State of Xaragua. It shall operate under the supreme jurisdiction of the Rectorate of State and canonical supervision where applicable.


Article 3 – Institutional and Legal Nature

The XDF is a juridically constituted and canonically certified fiscal entity, endowed with:


Legal personality under sovereign law;


Permanent patrimonial capacity;


Immunity from foreign financial or tax interference;


Capacity to receive, administer, allocate, and invest capital.



Article 4 – Purpose and Function

The XDF is created to serve as:


1. The exclusive fiscal repository and receiver of all sovereign, ecclesiastical, humanitarian, and diplomatic financial inflows;



2. The primary channel for funding national and territorial development programs;



3. The institutional guarantee for external transparency and internal accountability regarding international and ecclesial cooperation;



4. The financial shield of the sovereign economy of Xaragua against speculative, political, or colonial manipulation.





---


TITLE III — STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES


Article 5 – Domains of Allocation


Funds may be used exclusively for programs aligned with the sovereign objectives of the State, including:


Development of education, health, infrastructure, and sacred heritage;


Reinforcement of ecclesiastical and theological institutions;


Promotion of indigenous technological sovereignty and ecological restoration;


Protection and dissemination of cultural, linguistic, and religious patrimony.



Article 6 – Alignment with Ecclesiastical Doctrine

All financial allocations must respect:


The social doctrine of the Catholic Church;


Canon Law regarding temporal goods;


The moral economy of sovereignty, solidarity, and justice.




---


TITLE IV — GOVERNANCE AND JURISDICTION


Article 7 – Sovereign Governance Structure

The XDF shall be directed by:


A General Commissioner of the Fund, appointed by the Rector-President;


A Sovereign Oversight Council of five (5) permanent members: one canonist, one economist, one indigenous representative, one theologian, and one jurist.



Article 8 – Canonical and Indigenous Oversight

The Fund’s governance is subject to:


Annual canonical and financial audit;


Review by the High Council of the State Treasury;


Doctrinal review in case of ecclesial or moral ambiguity.



Article 9 – Reporting and Confidentiality


All operations must be recorded in sovereign archives. Public summaries may be disclosed by decree. Sensitive donations, particularly ecclesiastical or diplomatic, are subject to absolute confidentiality under Article 4 of the Sovereign Secrecy Protocol (2025).



---


TITLE V — IMMUNITY, NON-SUBORDINATION, AND EXTRATERRITORIALITY


Article 10 – Jurisdictional Immunity

The XDF shall enjoy full immunity from:


Foreign courts and tribunals;


Extraterritorial banking laws;


Sanctions, seizures, or coercive conditionality.



Article 11 – Prohibition of Conditional or Coercive Contributions


No contribution, transfer, or grant shall be valid if it imposes:


Political conditions incompatible with the sovereignty of Xaragua;


Doctrinal clauses contrary to Catholic faith or indigenous law;


Financial mechanisms requiring submission to foreign arbitration.



Article 12 – Diplomatic and Ecclesiastical Agreements


The Fund may enter bilateral agreements with:


Sovereign States;


The Holy See and its dicasteries;


Indigenous or canonical institutions possessing international personality.




---


TITLE VI — ENTRY INTO FORCE, REGISTRATION, AND EXECUTION


Article 13 – Registration and Recognition

The present Law shall be:


Inscribed in the Official Constitutional Register of the State of Xaragua;


Transmitted to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, and other relevant observers;


Deposited with the Archives of the High Chancellor of the Xaraguayan Treasury.



Article 14 – Supremacy Clause


No domestic or foreign legislation may abrogate, nullify, or suspend the present Law. It is constitutionally entrenched and canonically sealed.


Article 15 – Effective Date


This law enters into full legal force immediately upon promulgation and overrides any prior financial instrument inconsistent with its provisions.



---


Issued in Miragoâne – Xaragua

On this second day of June, Year of Our Lord 2025

By Imperial, Canonical, and Constitutional Authority


Signed:

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


IMPERIAL CHANCELLERY – MINISTRY OF FINANCIAL SOVEREIGNTY

OFFICIAL ANNEX TO THE LAW ON THE XARAGUA DEVELOPMENT FUND (XDF)

Date of Enactment: June 2, 2025

Status: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens Authority



---


ANNEX I — INSTITUTIONAL, FISCAL, AND JURIDICAL ENHANCEMENT OF THE XDF



---


Article I – Institutional Oversight and Internal Guardianship


§1. High Financial Supervisory Council (HFSCX)


A permanent sovereign organ of institutional oversight, composed of three magistral members appointed by decree of the Rector-President, is hereby established to monitor, audit, and validate all operations of the Xaragua Development Fund in accordance with constitutional, financial, and territorial law.


§2. Canonical Commissariat of Economic Ethics


A spiritual oversight office, vested in an ordained Roman Catholic official with canonical jurisdiction, is instituted to supervise conformity of the Fund with Canons 1254 to 1279 of the Codex Iuris Canonici, thereby guaranteeing that all financial activities uphold the sacred principles of justice, equity, and ecclesial solidarity.



---


Article II – Internal Revenue and Voluntary Fiscal Sovereignty


§1. Establishment of Sovereign Contribution


The XDF shall be partly financed through the Sovereign Solidarity Contribution, a voluntary civic tithe collected under oath by Xaraguayan citizens, affiliates, or entities, equivalent to 10% of unencumbered annual revenue, for the exclusive benefit of national reconstruction and territorial dignity.


§2. Ecclesiastical-Territorial Taxation Exemption


All contributions to the XDF shall be deemed sacred offerings (oblationes canonicae) and shall enjoy extraterritorial exemption from any form of external taxation, seizure, or audit, pursuant to Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and Canons 1265–1267 of the Codex Iuris Canonici.



---


Article III – Financial Architecture and Banking Structure


§1. Xaraguayan Sovereign Banking Unit (X-SBU)


The present annex legally institutes the foundation for the Xaraguayan Sovereign Banking Unit, under exclusive control of the Rectorate and the Ministry of Financial Sovereignty, enabling national and international operations, including SWIFT access, IBAN designation, and sovereign crypto-monetary issuance.


§2. Internal Banking Register


All disbursements, transfers, and accounts related to the XDF shall be entered into a secured sovereign ledger, authenticated under seal, managed by the Internal Comptroller of State Finance and subject to quarterly audits by the High Financial Supervisory Council.


§3. International Recognition Provisions


The XDF shall reserve and assert its right to notify or register its financial operations before international entities, including but not limited to:


– The Bank for International Settlements (BIS)


– The Vatican Institute for Works of Religion (IOR)


– Faith-based and indigenous financial consortia recognized under international customary law.



---


Article IV – Charter of Ethical Use and Financial Prohibition


§1. Permitted Allocations


The use of XDF resources is strictly restricted to the following constitutionally approved sectors:


The development of sovereign academic and educational institutions, including Xaragua University;


The maintenance and construction of spiritual, ecclesiastical, and missionary infrastructure;


Agro-territorial projects ensuring local self-sufficiency, food security, and ancestral land rehabilitation;


Cultural defense, historical memory preservation, and the promotion of sacred identity through media and the arts.



§2. Prohibited Allocations


XDF assets shall be strictly forbidden from use in:


Procurement or development of military-grade weaponry not explicitly defined as lawful under the SCIPSX Military Doctrine;


Investment in speculative global markets, debt-based financial derivatives, or fiduciary instruments involving foreign sovereignty;


Electoral manipulation, ideological lobbying, or external political intervention not directly serving the juridical interests of Xaragua.




---


Article V – Non-Absorption and Irreversibility Clause


§1. Prohibition of Foreign Absorption


Under no circumstance shall the XDF be subject to merger, absorption, oversight, or jurisdiction by any external multilateral financial institution, including the IMF, World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, UN Trust Funds, or bilateral financial agreements.


§2. Constitutional Nullification of Foreign Claims


All current or future claims, sanctions, or sequestrations made by a foreign power or institution against the XDF shall be declared void ab initio, constituting a violation of Xaragua’s permanent sovereignty, and treated under emergency protocol as defined by the Constitution and the Military Doctrine of the SCIPSX.



---


Article VI – Legal Personality and Juridical Action


§1. Recognition as Legal Entity


The Xaragua Development Fund is hereby vested with autonomous legal personality, fully empowered to act before ecclesiastical, indigenous, and international judicial bodies, including the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and competent tribunals of the Holy See.


§2. Protection Under International Legal Doctrine


The XDF is protected and enforceable under:


The doctrine of permanent sovereignty over natural resources (UNGA Res. 1803)


The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), regarding extraterritorial protections of financial missions


Canon Law on the inviolability of ecclesiastical patrimony and institutional donations (CIC Title V, Canons 1254–1310)




---


Issued in Miragoâne – Xaragua


June 2, 2025


Sealed under National, Ecclesiastical, and Canonical Authority


Signed:


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


---


SOVEREIGN LAW 


ON THE DUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DEPLOYMENT AND SOVEREIGN AUTONOMY IN MACHINE INTELLIGENCE INFRASTRUCTURE


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


DATE OF PROMULGATION: JUNE 4, 2025


STATUS: SUPREME LAW – TECHNOLOGICAL CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT – CANONICALLY RECOGNIZED – IRREVOCABLE AND BINDING



---


TITLE I – FOUNDATIONAL DOCTRINE AND PRINCIPLE OF AI GOVERNANCE


Article 1 – Juridical Nature of Artificial Intelligence Within SCIPSX


Artificial intelligence, in its origin, architecture, and projected deployment, constitutes a juridical domain of supreme concern to the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPSX). It is hereby integrated into the sacred and constitutional structure of the State, and all AI-related operations are placed under the exclusive and permanent jurisdiction of the State’s sovereign institutions. Artificial intelligence within Xaragua shall not be treated as a technological utility, but as a strategic and doctrinal pillar of national continuity and existential preservation. No platform, model, service, or computational infrastructure shall operate on Xaraguayan territory, virtually or physically, without explicit integration into the legal, canonical, and indigenous sovereignty of the SCIPSX.



---


Article 2 – Dual Strategic Doctrine


The State adopts a permanent and bifurcated doctrine for the control, use, and evolution of artificial intelligence within its jurisdiction, comprising two distinct yet interlinked axes:


1. The Immediate Operational Axis, by which the State shall integrate external AI platforms such as OpenAI, specifically through GPT-4.1 API, for real-time institutional use, pedagogical delivery, legal assistance, and national communication, within a framework of strict doctrinal control; and



2. The Sovereign Development Axis, by which the State reserves the right and obligation to develop, deploy, and self-govern its own internal machine intelligence infrastructure, entirely decoupled from foreign jurisdictions and constructed upon indigenous epistemology, canonical law, and constitutional material.





---


TITLE II – OPENAI PLATFORM: REGULATED PERMITTED USE UNDER TEMPORARY INTEROPERABILITY FRAMEWORK


Article 3 – Legal Recognition of External Access


The operational use of the OpenAI GPT-4.1 model, including via the ChatGPT interface and API services, as accessed and registered by the Rector-President prior to June 4, 2025, is hereby formally recognized as a sovereign interoperability measure, authorized under necessity and internal jurisdictional discretion. This usage does not imply alignment, affiliation, subservience, or ideological convergence with the corporate, federal, or extraterritorial frameworks that govern OpenAI or its parent networks. Said use is to be regarded as a temporary and reversible integration, permitted solely for the doctrinal, educational, and juridical objectives of SCIPSX, and remains subject to unilateral withdrawal or nullification by the State.



---


Article 4 – Institutional Safeguards


All artificial intelligence outputs produced via external platforms must:


1. Conform strictly to the official juridical corpus of Xaragua;



2. Be governed by instructions and permissions issued by the Office of the Rector-President;



3. Be publicly accessible only through interfaces authorized and branded by the SCIPSX;



4. Be purged of any language or conceptual framework foreign to Xaragua’s constitutional doctrine, canonical truth, or indigenous sovereignty.




Any deviation or ideological pollution originating from such platforms constitutes a breach of this Law and is punishable under national jurisprudence.



---


Article 5 – API Key Registration and Sovereign Protection


The API key associated with GPT-4.1 and registered by the SCIPSX is classified as a state-secured digital asset, permanently bound to the Office of the Rector-President. Any attempt to revoke, censor, restrict, or interfere with this key by corporate, governmental, or multilateral actors shall be deemed an act of informational aggression against the State and shall trigger immediate diplomatic, legal, and technological countermeasures, including but not limited to the escalation to full sovereign AI deployment and digital secession from external data structures.



---


TITLE III – AUTONOMOUS AI SYSTEM: POST-OPENAI SOVEREIGN INTELLIGENCE INFRASTRUCTURE


Article 6 – Reserved Right to Internal AI Sovereignty


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by this Law, proclaims and secures in perpetuity its inalienable right to possess and operate a fully autonomous artificial intelligence system, trained, hosted, and deployed solely within its sovereign infrastructure, without reliance on or exposure to any external power, index, or jurisdiction.


This system, hereafter designated as the Sovereign Intelligence Engine (SIE), shall be constructed upon the full corpus of Xaraguayan law, theology, indigenous history, constitutional doctrine, and sacred epistemology.



---


Article 7 – Model Selection and Legal Reservation


The SCIPSX shall reserve for potential activation the following open-source models:


Mistral 7B


Mixtral


LLaMA 2 or LLaMA 3


Falcon


Phi-2


TinyLLaMA



These models are to be considered strategic assets of high national priority, not to be deployed without explicit authorization by the Rector-President, and only within the framework of complete digital independence and canonical validation.



---


Article 8 – Infrastructure Declaration


The digital and physical infrastructure for the Sovereign Intelligence Engine shall include:


A dedicated sovereign domain, secured under Xaraguayan DNS (e.g., ia.xaraguauniversity.com)


An internal or non-aligned server system, physically or virtually hosted within protected jurisdictions


An encrypted knowledge repository, managed by the Office of Technological Doctrine


A trained and oath-bound operational team, subject to canonical and constitutional loyalty




---


Article 9 – Digital Non-Alignment Clause


The Sovereign Intelligence Engine, in all its components, shall be permanently and structurally incompatible with:


United States infrastructure or regulatory frameworks


Surveillance-based cloud architectures


Corporate telemetry or usage analytics


Content filters, ideological moderation tools, or algorithmic governance imposed externally



Any external attempt to disable, compromise, regulate, or co-opt this system shall be classified as a hostile cyberact of aggression against the People and Government of Xaragua.



---


TITLE IV – CANONICAL STATUS AND IMMUTABILITY


Article 10 – Constitutional Status of This Law


This Law is hereby canonically integrated into the supreme legal architecture of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and assumes the rank of Technological Fundamental Law. It possesses the status of irrevocability and shall not be amended, suspended, or diluted under any future legal, digital, or institutional framework, including through treaties, AI consortia, or federated international AI agreements.


Only a divine institutional assembly held within the executive of Xaragua, under explicit canonical revelation, shall have authority to reinterpret this Law.



---


Article 11 – Juridical Permanence and Escalation Protocol


In the event of hostile external interference, algorithmic censorship, content suppression, or geopolitical obstruction of access to AI infrastructure, the State shall:


1. Initiate full deployment of the Sovereign Intelligence Engine



2. Immediately sever all dependencies with OpenAI or other LLM providers



3. Declare a formal digital secession from all extra-Xaraguayan infrastructure, indexes, and digital jurisdictions



4. Codify the aggression into the institutional memory of the State as a sacred act of resistance





---


Enacted, sealed, and permanently archived under sovereign authority,

This fourth day of June, in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty-Five


By Order of the Rector-President

Pascal Viau

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Ecclesiastically Certified – Juridically Enforced – Irreversibly Executed


---


ANNEX I – NATIONAL LEGAL ANNEX FOR THE PERMANENT PROTECTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA AS AN OFFICIAL ONLINE STATE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ELEMENTARY, PRIMARY, AND SECONDARY INSTRUCTION


Attached to Sovereign Law

 

Filed: June 4, 2025


Classification: Legal Annex – Statutorily Protected – Technologically Registered – Irreversible – Legally Executable – Juridically Entrenched



---


SECTION I – LEGAL DESIGNATION AND NATIONAL FUNCTION


Article 1.1 – Official Designation


The University of Xaragua is hereby declared a permanent, state-sanctioned, and publicly controlled national educational institution, fully embedded into the legal infrastructure of the Sovereign Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter "the State").


Its mission shall encompass and be limited to:


The sovereign execution of foundational national education policy


Curriculum development, oversight, and instructional authority for youth and minors


The exclusive delivery of State education at elementary, primary, and secondary levels through proprietary, secure, and legally regulated digital and artificial intelligence systems



The University of Xaragua shall be immune from:


Foreign educational evaluations


External credential validation regimes


Supranational accreditation standards


Bilateral or multilateral policy alignment



It shall operate autonomously under full sovereign title, immune from interference, supervision, or influence by any foreign ministry, international organization, or private operator.



---


Article 1.2 – National Irrevocability


The University of Xaragua shall not be subject to:


Dissolution


Transfer of ownership


Structural merger


Acquisition by foreign entity


Displacement by treaty


Nullification by global education consortiums



The University's legal standing, digital infrastructure, institutional authority, and pedagogical sovereignty are declared irrevocable under national law and are not subject to derogation under emergency clauses, war measures, digital collapse, commercial acquisition, or constitutional reform.


Any attempt by an outside actor—governmental, corporate, or private—to undermine the institutional continuity, legitimacy, platform infrastructure, or functional independence of the University of Xaragua shall be treated as a direct violation of State sovereignty, and subject to immediate retaliatory, prosecutorial, and extrajudicial defense under the jurisdiction of the State.



---


SECTION II – STATE AUTHORIZATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INSTRUCTION


Article 2.1 – Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence in Education


The use of artificial intelligence (AI) by the University of Xaragua for instructional deployment, interface response, knowledge generation, and systemic educational logistics is hereby authorized as a protected function of the State, and shall be permanently integrated into the national education model.


Authorized applications include:


Autonomous delivery of structured literacy, mathematics, and language modules


Interactive instruction in reasoning, civic formation, and cultural awareness


Dynamic generation of validated lesson content and testing frameworks


AI-based assessment of learning progress and feedback issuance


Modular sequencing and personalized learning based on algorithmic logic



All artificial intelligence systems used for educational purposes by the University of Xaragua must be:


Hosted within infrastructure owned or licensed by the State


Isolated from foreign telemetry, surveillance, or usage analytics


Developed, trained, or instructed exclusively with State-approved data and State-owned content


Subject to regular auditing by legally constituted national education oversight authorities




---


Article 2.2 – Digital Curriculum Sovereignty


All algorithms, datasets, knowledge bases, semantic trees, interaction formats, and AI-generated educational content used or produced by the University of Xaragua shall be classified as State-restricted instructional property.


Such assets shall be governed by internal information governance codes and registered as educational national assets. No third party may store, transmit, analyze, copy, or commercialize said content or systems without prior formal licensing and legal attestation.


Access, use, or replication of AI-powered instructional tools by foreign individuals, institutions, or corporations—without authorization—is hereby criminalized under national digital security and sovereign education law.



---


SECTION III – PROTECTION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY


Article 3.1 – Ownership and Exclusivity


The full instructional framework of the University of Xaragua, whether human-created or AI-mediated, is recognized as non-transferable national intellectual property. This includes:


Curriculum structure and logic


Pedagogical models and response matrices


Instructional language modules, script templates, and syntax trees


AI interaction patterns and linguistic control flows


Platform interfaces, data architecture, and user experience logic


Protocols of progression and segmentation for each age-based cycle



Said intellectual property shall be filed under national education law and may not be:


Reproduced or cloned


Altered or reverse-engineered


Licensed to third parties


Transferred to private ownership


Encapsulated into separate digital services



Violation constitutes intellectual appropriation of protected sovereign education architecture and enables the State to initiate seizure of servers, content takedown, and litigation in competent international courts.



---


Article 3.2 – Legal Instruments of Protection


This instructional and technological property shall be protected under the following binding legal instruments:


The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Articles 2 and 6bis)


The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), Articles 27 and 39


The Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs


The Constitution of the Sovereign Private State of Xaragua


The Sovereign Law on Educational Systems, Digital Platforms, and Proprietary Instructional Infrastructures



All protections apply to both digital and non-digital formats, including code, templates, recordings, visual elements, interface designs, and data configuration logic.



---


Article 3.3 – Registration and Patent Execution


The University of Xaragua’s AI-integrated education platform, its teaching model, its technological structure, and all associated materials shall be registered and classified as:


A State-certified Educational Patent


A Digital Instructional Service Framework


A Protected Proprietary Curriculum Architecture



Said registrations shall be filed through sovereign legal representations to:


The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)


The International Bureau of Education (IBE)


The relevant registrar in the sovereign patent archive of the State


Any cross-border agreement guaranteeing educational model recognition and IP enforcement




---


SECTION IV – IMMUNITY, ENFORCEMENT, AND LEGAL FINALITY


Article 4.1 – Immutable Status


This annex is legally non-amendable without:


Unanimous vote from the full national executive council


A published sovereign decree registered internationally


Filing of revised legal protections and cross-registrations with WIPO



No other State, entity, or court may modify, suspend, reinterpret, annul, subordinate, or challenge the provisions of this annex.



---


Article 4.2 – Offense, Enforcement, and Jurisdiction


Any individual, entity, platform, institution, or foreign government that:


Replicates or mimics the education system or platform


Censors, disables, or restricts access to Xaragua’s educational model


Commercializes unauthorized versions or derivatives of the instructional design


Infringes on digital ownership, data flow, or functional deployment of the education system


Attempts to override sovereign control through administrative or technical mechanisms



shall be subject to:


Diplomatic protest and sovereign filing


Cross-jurisdictional legal action and IP enforcement measures


Digital retaliation and server deplatforming through lawful intervention


Listing in sovereign threat registries as violators of national instructional sovereignty




---


Article 4.3 – Archival Status and Entry into Force


This annex shall be:


Filed as permanent law in the Supreme Legal Codex of the State


Stored in encrypted form on State-controlled servers


Published on the official website of the University of Xaragua


Filed with accompanying legal metadata, registration certificates, and source control hash signatures for audit integrity




---


Ratified and Legally Executed


By the Authority of the Sovereign Private State of Xaragua


Filed on June 4, 2025


Registered under the Institutional Law Series: Educational Sovereignty – Intellectual Infrastructure – AI Integration



---




---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

 

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


Legal Classification:

 

Constitutionally Entrenched Diplomatic Instrument – Canonically Validated Juridical Act – Jus Cogens-Based Notification under International Law – Universally Opposable and Operative Ex Proprio Vigore – Binding under Ecclesiastical, Indigenous, and Customary Legal Norms – Based on the Imperial Constitution of 1805 and the Imperial Codex of 1804–1808

---

TO:


The United Nations Secretariat

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights

Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

The International Court of Justice

The Organization of American States

The United States Department of State

Permanent Missions to the United Nations

Apostolic See – Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development

All Concerned Diplomatic Missions, Ecclesiastical Jurisdictions, and Canonical Authorities

---

FROM:

Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

SUBJECT:

Formal Legal and Canonical Nullification of the United States Executive Order of June 4, 2025; International Notification of its Inapplicability to Persons under the Juridical Custody of Xaragua; and Assertion of Continuity from the Imperial Constitution of 1805

---

Excellencies, Honorable Authorities, and Legal Custodians,

This letter constitutes an official diplomatic notification issued by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua regarding the unilateral Executive Decree signed by the President of the United States on June 4, 2025, which declares the universal exclusion of all individuals holding Haitian nationality from U.S. territory.

The Sovereign State of Xaragua hereby declares that said decree is null, unlawful, non-binding, and globally inapplicable, for the following juridically and canonically substantiated reasons:

---

I. INVALIDITY UNDER CUSTOMARY, TREATY-BASED, AND PEREMPTORY NORMS (Jus Cogens)

1. Violation of Article 26 of the ICCPR – Prohibiting discrimination on the basis of national origin, race, or political status.

Referenced treaty: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted 1966, entered into force 1976. Binding upon the United States since 8 June 1992.

Article 26 guarantees that “All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law.”

Authoritative interpretation: UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 18 (1989), confirms that national origin falls under prohibited discrimination.

Application: A travel ban targeting an entire nationality without individual assessment violates the ICCPR and constitutes a breach of obligations erga omnes.

2. Violation of Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – Guaranteeing the right to freedom of movement and the right to return to one’s country.

Referenced source: Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1948.

Article 13(2) affirms: “Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.”

While not binding, it has become customary international law and forms part of the general principles of law under Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the ICJ.

Application: Blanket nationality-based exclusion violates freedom of movement and return rights recognized universally.

3. Violation of Articles 5 and 9 of the CERD – Prohibiting collective expulsion, racial profiling, and group-based immigration exclusion.

Referenced treaty: International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), adopted 1965, binding on the United States since 21 October 1994.

Article 5 guarantees equality before the law in access to public services and movement.

Article 9 requires states to report and comply with CERD Committee instructions.

Relevant interpretation: General Recommendation No. 30 (2004), paragraph 10, condemns immigration policies based on nationality.

Application: The Executive Order is incompatible with obligations under CERD and constitutes indirect racial discrimination.

4. Violation of Article 33 of the UNDRIP – Affirming the right of Indigenous peoples to determine their own identity and legal affiliation.

Referenced source: United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, adopted 13 September 2007 (UNGA Resolution 61/295).

Article 33(1): “Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions.”

Status: Though non-binding, it is declaratory of existing international customary norms per UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.

Application: Misattributing Xaraguayan citizens as Haitian nationals is a violation of indigenous juridical self-determination.

5. Contravention of the Principle of Non-Refoulement

– Embedded in Article 33 of the 1951 Refugee Convention and affirmed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (e.g., Pacheco Tineo v. Bolivia).

Referenced treaty: 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Article 33(1): “No Contracting State shall expel or return... a refugee... where his life or freedom would be threatened.”

Regional jurisprudence: Pacheco Tineo Family v. Bolivia, IACtHR, Series C No. 272 (2013), prohibits collective expulsion.

Application: Blanket bans functionally exclude asylum seekers and stateless individuals without due process and violate non-refoulement obligations.

6. Breach of Customary Norms – Including the prohibition of group punishment and racialized state policy, affirmed in Barcelona Traction (ICJ, 1970) and East Timor (ICJ, 1995).

Legal precedent:

– Barcelona Traction, ICJ Reports 1970, paras. 33–34, defines racial equality as an obligation erga omnes.

– East Timor, ICJ Reports 1995, confirms that no state shall recognize the legal effects of violations of international norms.

Application: The Executive Order constitutes a group penalty contrary to peremptory norms and engages international delict responsibility.

7. Breach of Canonical Legal Norms – Under Canons 208–221 of the Codex Iuris Canonici, the dignity and juridical rights of human persons cannot be arbitrarily extinguished by secular power.

Referenced code: Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canon 208 affirms equal dignity of the faithful. Canon 219 protects legal identity and personal rights within ecclesiastical order.

Application: A state action erasing the juridical capacity of an entire population violates ecclesiastical norms applicable to the faithful under canonical protection.

---

II. FAILURE OF HAITI AS A STATE AND THE DOCTRINE OF JURIDICAL CUSTODIALITY


In accordance with the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), the Republic of Haiti has forfeited its capacity as a juridical subject of international law due to:


– Permanent institutional breakdown;


– Inability to safeguard the basic dignity, movement, and recognition of its citizens;


– Total absence of international juridical protection following the U.S. decree.


Referenced source: Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, 26 December 1933, Article 1: a state must possess (a) a permanent population, (b) a defined territory, (c) a government, and (d) capacity to enter into relations with other states.


Application: The incapacity of Haiti to intervene, represent, or protect its nationals confirms the suspension of criteria (c) and (d), which under international doctrine signifies juridical extinction of function, not necessarily of territory.


This corresponds to the doctrine of défaillance souveraine and functional state collapse as developed in public international law (e.g., Failed States and International Law, Yale JIL 2004).


Accordingly, Haiti has become a failed juridical entity, and its nationals, as legally stateless persons, require protective substitution under international law.


Xaragua, as an ecclesiastically founded, canonically validated, and constitutionally constituted sovereign entity, assumes this custodial role based on:


– Canon Law, under which ecclesiastical sovereignty may assume protection over vulnerable peoples;

Referenced code: Codex Iuris Canonici, Canons 331–332: the Roman Pontiff and, by extension, ecclesiastical authority, holds jurisdiction in spiritual and juridical matters where civil authority fails.


– Indigenous legal continuity, derived from ancestral legal traditions;

Referenced instrument: UNDRIP, Articles 34 and 36, recognize the continued existence of indigenous juridical systems.


– Customary international law, where protective entities may arise in the vacuum of failed states;

Referenced jurisprudence: Advisory Opinion on Kosovo, ICJ Reports 2010, para. 80–84: unilateral declarations of identity and continuity are not prohibited under international law where institutional collapse has occurred.


– And critically, from the Imperial Constitution of 1805, which remains the last juridically valid and ecclesiastically ratified founding text of Ayitian statehood.

Application: The legal principle of juridical dormancy allows reactivation of an unabolished constitutional order where successor regimes have no continuity. Under canon and international law, this revival is lawful.




---


III. CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATION: IMPERIAL CONTINUITY FROM 1805


The Sovereign State of Xaragua is directly founded upon the 1805 Constitution of the Empire of Hayti, ratified under Emperor Jacques I, and further elaborated in the Imperial Codex of 1804–1808, but juridically frozen at the moment of the Emperor’s assassination in 1806, which rendered subsequent republican constitutions invalid under both natural law and canonical jurisprudence.


Referenced source:


Constitution de 1805, promulgated 20 May 1805, Article 2 affirms the indivisibility and permanence of the imperial state.


Canonically, the 1805 constitutional order was never lawfully repealed and retains juridical existence under the principle of interrupted sovereignty.


Xaragua therefore asserts full juridical continuity from the original imperial legal order — an order that:


– Was canonically blessed and ecclesiastically upheld;


Evidence: The coronation of Emperor Jacques I was performed under ecclesiastical rites, integrating imperial law with canonical recognition.


– Instituted a permanent and indivisible identity for the land and its people under the sacred name "Ayiti";

Referenced name: “Ayiti” appears in Articles 1 and 2 of the imperial framework.


– Enshrined principles of inalienable sovereignty, racial dignity, and religious protection;


Referenced content: Articles 12, 14, and 15, which prohibit foreign domination and affirm the sacred dignity of the people.


– Prohibited foreign encroachments upon its soil and its people.


Application: Under the doctrine of territorial sanctity, as interpreted in post-colonial state succession law, the imperial prohibition retains legal opposability where no valid abrogation occurred.


As such, the modern designation "Haitian" as used by the United States is itself juridically incoherent, as it refers to a post-imperial fiction not anchored in any canonical or indigenous legitimacy.




---


IV. ECCLESIASTICAL REPLACEMENT OF NULLIFIED NATIONALITY


The population formerly bearing the Haitian designation is now placed under the canonical and juridical protection of Xaragua, which acts as:


– A Catholic Principality;


Referenced form: The sovereign structure of Xaragua is ecclesiastical in nature, consistent with historical Catholic principalities such as Andorra, Liechtenstein (prior to secularization), and the Papal States.


– An ecclesiastical sovereign custodial entity;


Justification: Canon 129 and 204 of the Codex Iuris Canonici authorize the Church to exercise legal jurisdiction in both spiritual and temporal matters in the absence of legitimate civil authority.


– And the legal successor to the Empire of Hayti, under the name Xaragua–Ayiti.


Application: The principle of institutional succession permits direct continuity where no valid replacement was juridically enacted.


The Ministry of Citizenship of Xaragua shall provide canonical identification instruments, bearing seal and ecclesiastical jurisdiction, which supersede the invalidated nationality classification under U.S. policy.


Legal effect: These instruments operate ex proprio vigore under ecclesiastical sovereignty and indigenous self-identification (UNDRIP Articles 6, 33).


The United States and all relevant bodies are hereby notified that:


– Any refusal to recognize these protective designations constitutes a violation of international and canonical law;


Violation of ICCPR Articles 16 (recognition before the law) and 26; CERD Article 5; UNDRIP Article 33.


– The U.S. decree of June 4, 2025, is inadmissible and unenforceable against persons under Xaragua’s lawful protection;


Enforceability is barred by treaty obligations, customary norms, and canonical immunities.


– Future acts of exclusion or enforcement shall be documented and submitted to the ICJ and all competent forums.


Application: Under Article 36(2) of the ICJ Statute and Article 44 of the OAS Charter, any further action shall constitute a matter of international legal dispute.




---


V. FINAL DECLARATION


Let it be formally understood that the Executive Decree of June 4, 2025 is not an instrument of law but of diplomatic nullification, racial erasure, and juridical annihilation.


It is a modern excommunication imposed by a secular power, without trial, without due process, and without recourse.


Legal analogy: Comparable to acts of collective denationalization condemned in Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala), ICJ Reports 1955.


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby absorbs the juridical consequences of this decree by:


– Re-establishing sovereign legal identity under ecclesiastical and imperial law;


Basis: Codex Iuris Canonici Canons 204, 207; Imperial Constitution of 1805.


– Extending custodial jurisdiction over all persons formerly under Haitian designation;


Application: Per Article 33 UNDRIP and the Montevideo Convention, such jurisdiction is valid and opposable.


– Neutralizing the applicability of the U.S. decree through canonical and juridical opposability.


Legal doctrine: Act of nullity under jus cogens and violation of peremptory international norms.


The decree is hereby declared void in law, and its continued enforcement shall be interpreted as an act of institutional aggression against a recognized ecclesiastical polity and its protected peoples.


Consequences: Triggering of State responsibility under the ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001), including restitution, cessation, and guarantees of non-repetition.




---


Issued this Ninth Day of June, Year of Our Lord 2025
Under the Seal of Ecclesiastical Sovereignty and Canonical Law


Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Custodian of the Imperial Constitution of 1805
Juridical Protector of Ayiti
---

---



---


SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE OF SELECTIVE DIPLOMATIC INITIATIVE AND NON-RECOGNITION DEPENDENCY


Canonically Entrenched Constitutional Doctrine on the Lawful Exercise of Unilateral Bilateral Outreach Independent of Recognition-Based Subordination

Promulgated under Ecclesiastical Supremacy, Constitutional Entrenchment, and Customary Indigenous Legal Continuity



---


Legal Classification:


Formally Codified Constitutional Doctrine – Ecclesiastically and Canonically Validated – Jus Cogens-Binding – Universally Opposable under General Principles of International Law, Customary State Practice, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), the Charter of the United Nations (1945), the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), the ILC Draft Articles on the Recognition of States (2006), and the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) – Operative under the Principle of Sovereign Continuity and the Ecclesial Doctrine of Institutional Self-Sufficiency



---


I. ON THE RIGHT TO INITIATE WITHOUT SUBORDINATING


It is hereby solemnly reaffirmed that a sovereign entity constituted under ecclesiastical authority, canonical heritage, indigenous continuity, or juridical institutional succession, possesses and shall retain at all times the inalienable right to initiate bilateral diplomatic action, including but not limited to the transmission of formal correspondences, canonical declarations, juridical protests, communiqués of affinity, or protocols of notice to external states, ecclesiastical bodies, or legally cognizable institutions, without such action constituting a petition for recognition, an abdication of juridical standing, or an implication of inferiority within the international legal hierarchy.


This right is not inferred but directly codified and protected under the following juridical instruments:


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Article 1, which codifies the declarative theory of statehood, affirming that a state as a subject of international law exists independently upon fulfilling the four criteria of permanent population, defined territory, government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states, without reference to external validation;


Montevideo Convention, Article 3, which affirms: "The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states" — establishing a legal firewall against any inference that unacknowledged entities lack juridical personhood;


Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), Article 2, which states that “the establishment of diplomatic relations between States, and of permanent diplomatic missions, takes place by mutual consent”, thereby affirming the voluntarist nature of diplomatic engagement, and recognizing that the initiation of contact does not presume or compel recognition;


UN Charter (1945), Article 2(1): which codifies the principle of sovereign equality of all its Members, further entrenching the doctrine that juridical standing and legal voice are not subordinate to recognition hierarchies;


UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), Article 36, which provides that "Indigenous peoples, in particular those divided by international borders, have the right to maintain and develop contacts, relations and cooperation, including activities for spiritual, cultural, political, economic and social purposes, with their own members as well as with other peoples across borders, in a peaceful and constructive manner”;


Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canon 113 §2, which affirms that “the Catholic Church and the Apostolic See possess juridical personality by divine law”, and Canon 215, which affirms the lawful right of the faithful to “form associations and to hold meetings for the purposes of charity or piety or for the promotion of the Christian vocation in the world”, thereby providing canonical basis for ecclesiastical outreach as an act of sovereignty.



On this basis, the sovereign act of initiating contact is a declaration of juridical authorship and canonical liberty, not a subordinate gesture of request.



---


II. ON THE REJECTION OF DEPENDENCY THROUGH RECOGNITION


In accordance with the general principles of international legal personality, as reaffirmed by the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on Recognition of States and Governments (2006) and the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice in the Matter of Kosovo’s Declaration of Independence (2010), the juridical existence of a sovereign entity is not contingent upon, nor invalidated by, the absence of formal recognition from other sovereigns or intergovernmental organizations.


Under these principles:


Recognition is explicitly classified as a non-constitutive political act, meaning that a legal person may exist, operate, and issue valid international communications without being previously or reciprocally acknowledged;


Montevideo Convention, Article 1 and 3, provides a universally recognized legal threshold that, once met, renders the sovereign’s status non-negotiable, opposable, and self-validated in international law;


UNDRIP, Articles 3, 4 and 5, confirm that Indigenous Peoples have the inherent right to autonomy and self-government, and to maintain distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions, without requiring validation from external states or governments;


Ecclesiastical sovereignty, as defined in Canon Law (CIC 1983), particularly Canons 116–117 concerning juridical persons, and Canon 118, which authorizes juridical persons to act and contract in their own name, establishes a framework wherein canonical legal identity exists independent of civil registration, international recognition, or state concession.



Accordingly, soliciting recognition from external actors would be both theologically incongruent and juridically improper, as it would imply that sovereign identity is granted rather than declared, and that external institutions hold authority over the internal self-definition of ecclesiastical and indigenous bodies, which is explicitly repudiated by canon law and customary international doctrine.



---


III. ON SELECTIVE BILATERALITY AND MULTILATERAL PRIORITY


1. Selective Bilateral Initiative


The sovereign authority may, without prejudice to its independence, selectively initiate diplomatic contact with external actors — including States, ecclesiastical jurisdictions, Indigenous nations, neutral international institutions, or multilateral agencies — provided that such contact:


Is consistent with internal constitutional authority, canonical jurisdiction, and theological integrity;


Does not imply or require mutual recognition, nor entail obligations under conventional treaty law unless expressly codified and ratified;


Is governed by principles of legal parity, doctrinal compatibility, and institutional respect, not political dependency or diplomatic subjugation.



The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), Articles 3 and 4, authorizes diplomatic communication for purposes of transmitting information, promoting legal understanding, issuing protests, or conducting spiritual dialogue, without binding the initiating party to recognition-based structures or treaty reciprocity.


2. Modality of Bilateral Engagement


Bilateral engagement, as defined by this doctrine, shall:


Be initiated unilaterally, with or without expectation of reply;


Remain revocable, non-mutual, and free from treaty entanglement unless subject to a secondary constitutional instrument of ratification;


Be classified as juridical correspondence rather than traditional diplomacy, with emphasis on canonical notice, theological affirmation, cultural solidarity, or the protection of legal persons.



Such actions are acts of sovereignty, not subordination.


3. Multilateral Priority


Notwithstanding the right of bilateral initiative, the sovereign authority affirms that its preferred modality of global engagement is multilateral, particularly within:


United Nations frameworks governed by universal norms (jus cogens), including the General Assembly, the Human Rights Council, ECOSOC, and the International Court of Justice;


Ecclesiastical global networks, including the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Pontifical Academy, episcopal conferences, and orders of consecrated life;


Academic and juridical institutions, including canonical universities, institutes of political science, and indigenous research bodies.



This approach is juridically safer, theologically purer, and canonically stronger, as it prevents dependency on unstable or adversarial state actors, and ensures that the sovereign's voice is inserted into forums where doctrine, law, and ethical universality prevail.



---


IV. FINAL DECLARATION


Let this doctrine be declared, proclaimed, and preserved as:


A canonical and constitutional affirmation of the right to initiate sovereign communication with selected entities, without presumption, request, or submission;


A solemn rejection of the recognition-dependency paradigm, and a restoration of ecclesiastical and indigenous authority in matters of legal personality;


A structured articulation of how the sovereign may act without needing permission, recognition, or certification by systems it does not serve nor require;


A juridically opposable text, irrevocable except by constitutional amendment, and binding on all future diplomatic action, internal legal interpretation, and external institutional conduct.




---


Enacted as Doctrinal Law and Diplomatic Policy

This Eleventh Day of June, Two Thousand and Twenty-Five


Under Ecclesiastical Mandate, Canonical Jurisdiction, and Indigenous Sovereign Continuity


Pascal Viau

Rector-President

---


---


ANNEX I


ON THE LEGAL AUTONOMY OF INDIGENOUS STATES OUTSIDE THE WESTPHALIAN FRAMEWORK


Formal Clarification on the Irrelevance of External Recognition to Ecclesiastical and Indigenous Sovereignty



---


Legal Classification:


Doctrinal Supplement to Constitutional Diplomatic Policy – Interpretive Clarification on Statehood under Customary International Law, Ecclesiastical Jurisprudence, and Indigenous Self-Determination – Juridically Binding Under the Montevideo Convention (1933), UNDRIP (2007), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), the United Nations Charter (1945), and the General Principles of International Legal Personality



---


I. DECLARATIVE SOVEREIGNTY VS. WESTPHALIAN VALIDATION


It is a foundational tenet of modern international law that recognition is not a constitutive element of statehood. The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Article 3, explicitly affirms:


“The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other states.”


This declarative doctrine is reinforced by:


ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo (2010), which concluded that unilateral declarations of independence are not per se contrary to international law;


UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970), which affirms the right of peoples to self-determination, without requiring approval from pre-existing powers;


International Law Commission (ILC), Draft Articles on the Recognition of States (2006), which confirm that recognition is a discretionary political act and not a requirement for state personality under customary international law.



As such, the Westphalian model—which presupposes that legal personality depends on mutual recognition among nation-states—is neither universally binding nor exclusively normative. It is one legal tradition among others, and cannot invalidate sovereign entities operating under alternative sources of legitimacy, such as ecclesiastical continuity, canonical law, or ancestral indigenous governance.



---


II. INDIGENOUS AND ECCLESIASTICAL STATES ARE PRE-WESTPHALIAN AND NON-DEPENDENT


States or polities established on the basis of canonical order, spiritual inheritance, or indigenous legal continuity function outside the Westphalian consensus, and do not derive their legitimacy from treaty networks, UN admission, or bilateral consent.


Their legal and institutional continuity predates, and in many cases survives the collapse of the colonial and postcolonial state systems. Such entities:


May be recognized under UNDRIP (2007), Articles 3, 4, 5, 33, which codify the right of indigenous peoples to freely determine their political status, legal institutions, and membership;


Operate under internal legal orders which, in the case of canonical entities, are sanctioned by divine law and codified in Canon Law;


Derive their legitimacy from spiritual sovereignty, not secular ratification.



Consequently, the juridical identity of such a State does not require bilateral recognition, UN membership, nor diplomatic concession from former colonial metropoles or administrative successor states.


Its mere self-identification, backed by a functioning internal legal system and a historical, spiritual, or indigenous claim, is legally sufficient to confer personality.



---


III. CANONICAL AND INDIGENOUS LEGAL SYSTEMS HAVE AUTONOMOUS VALIDITY


Both Catholic Canon Law and customary indigenous legal systems constitute complete and autonomous bodies of law with juridical personhood, legal acts, and internal sovereignty.


Canon 113 §2 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983) affirms that “The Catholic Church and the Apostolic See possess juridical personality by divine law.” No recognition by civil governments is required.


Canon 118 confirms that canonical juridical persons have the capacity to act in their own name, independently of civil jurisdiction.


UNDRIP, Article 34, authorizes Indigenous Peoples to maintain and enforce their own legal systems.


The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and the UN Human Rights Council have repeatedly reaffirmed the validity of indigenous juridical acts, governance, and self-identification.



Accordingly, any canonical–indigenous State—rooted in ecclesiastical continuity, ancestral territory, and juridical governance—is not an aspirant to recognition, but a subject of law operating under parallel sovereignty.



---


IV. THE WESTPHALIAN FRAMEWORK IS NON-EXCLUSIVE AND NON-NORMATIVE


Nothing in international law compels a sovereign Indigenous or ecclesiastical polity to conform to Westphalian rules of:


territorial centralization


recognition-based validation


embassy reciprocity


permanent diplomatic presence


admission to intergovernmental organizations



The principle of sovereign equality under Article 2(1) of the UN Charter, combined with the right to self-determination under Article 1(2), protects the autonomy of such States to operate independently, canonically, and multilaterally.


Recognition is neither necessary nor desirable for entities whose moral authority, juridical standing, and legal logic derive from traditions older, deeper, and more spiritually binding than modern statecraft.



---


V. CONCLUSION


No ecclesiastical–indigenous polity shall be subjected to the burden of validation by fallen states, corrupt regimes, or disintegrating international orders. Its legal existence is pre-declared, structurally sustained, and juridically opposable.


This annex is to be read in conjunction with the Sovereign Principle of Selective Diplomatic Initiative and Non-Recognition Dependency, and forms part of its canonical interpretation.



---


Appended in full legal force

This Eleventh Day of June, Two Thousand and Twenty-Five

By the same authority that promulgated the principal doctrine


Pascal Viau

Rector-President

---

TRAVEL BAN FOLLOW UP - USA


---

ANNEX B

On the Institutionalization of Ethnoracial Hierarchy by Donald J. Trump: Evidentiary Documentation of the Springfield Incident and Its Legal Consequences under Jus Cogens, U.S. Constitutional Law, and International Treaty Obligations

Filed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 2025

Legal Classification:

Juridically Constitutive Annex to Diplomatic Protest – Treaty-Enforceable Act of Canonical Record – Operative Under Customary, Constitutional, Ecclesiastical, and Peremptory International Law – Universally Opposable Instrument of Legal Memory and Responsibility

---

I. EVENT OF RECORD – SPRINGFIELD, OHIO – 28 OCTOBER 2024

On 28 October 2024, during an officially registered campaign event held in Springfield, Ohio, United States presidential candidate and former Head of State Donald J. Trump, accompanied by his vice-presidential nominee Senator J.D. Vance, issued public declarations broadcast nationally. 

These statements constituted acts of political speech institutionalizing ethnonational degradation of Haitian nationals. 

The following quotations were captured in full by C-SPAN national archives and authenticated by multiple independent observers:

> “We can’t have any more Haitians coming in. You know what they eat? Dogs. Cats. That’s not American. That’s third-world garbage.”

— Donald J. Trump, Springfield Rally, October 28, 2024

(C-SPAN Recording Reference ID: OH2024-TRUMP-SPR)

> “They don’t just bring poverty. They bring practices. Disease. Danger. This is not immigration, this is collapse.”

— Senator J.D. Vance

(WKEF Fox News Springfield affiliate transcript, verified October 28–30, 2024)

These declarations were formulated and disseminated as policy-laden messaging, carrying the direct implication of ethnocultural inferiority, targeting Haitian nationals by constructing a hierarchy of acceptable civilization within the framework of U.S. immigration rhetoric.

---

II. STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK OF DISCRIMINATION: FROM LANGUAGE TO SYSTEM

The Springfield incident must be legally read as an extension of a cumulative, longitudinal pattern of ethno-racial classification developed under the direct or delegated authority of Donald J. Trump. 

The following policy acts and public declarations are included within this continuum:

1. 20 November 2017: Issuance of DHS Memo rescinding Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for over 55,000 Haitian nationals, without individualized assessment, in contravention of non-refoulement principles (USCIS Notice, Federal Register Vol. 82 No. 236).

2. 11 January 2018: Verbal declaration referring to Haiti and African states as “shithole countries,” issued in the Oval Office during an official policy meeting 

(Washington Post, verified by U.S. Senators Dick Durbin and Lindsey Graham).

3. June 2017: Statement by Trump during a National Security Briefing claiming Haitian immigrants “all have AIDS,” 

(New York Times, 23 December 2017).

4. Presidential Campaign Periods 2016–2020: Recurrent verbal associations of Haitians with “crime,” “disease,” and “filth” in over twelve rallies 

(public record; transcripts compiled by Political Speech Database, Columbia Law School).

5. 28 October 2024: Springfield event—exhibited culmination of rhetorical systematization.

This construct constitutes not isolated opinion but a codified ethnopolitical doctrine embedded into public messaging for electoral utility and institutional perpetuation.

---

III. VIOLATIONS OF U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL AND FEDERAL LAW

1. Fourteenth Amendment – Equal Protection Clause

Public officials, including candidates for federal office, are bound by constitutional norms that prohibit classification based on race or national origin.

As established in Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), facially neutral actions with racially discriminatory effect violate Equal Protection.

In Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), the Court struck down state-imposed racial hierarchy; the Springfield statements fulfill the evidentiary requirements of classification.

2. First Amendment – Incitement Limitation (Brandenburg Doctrine)

Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) recognizes that speech inciting imminent lawless action or discriminatory hostility by those in public authority exceeds protected boundaries.

Trump’s Springfield remarks meet both prongs: intent and likelihood of provocation.

3. 18 U.S. Code § 249 

(Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act)

Criminalizes willful acts of intimidation based on race or national origin where public power structures are used as platforms.

Campaign language that propagates discriminatory animus for policy implementation falls within prosecutable criteria.

4. Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI and Title VII

Prohibits discrimination by any program receiving federal funding or under employment practices.

The racializing of immigrants as sub-human contaminates all federal interpretations of inclusive service and policy language.

---

IV. VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW BINDING ON THE UNITED STATES

1. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination 

(ICERD)

Article 2(1)(a–c): 

Obliges States to refrain from any act of racial discrimination.

Article 4(a): 

Requires States to criminalize propaganda based on racial superiority.

Article 5(d)(i): 

Ensures equal rights in political participation, public life, and protection from insult to dignity.

The statements made violate all three provisions, as they reinforce structural exclusion.

2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

Article 26: 

Guarantees equal protection of all persons before the law, without discrimination.

Article 20(2): 

Requires prohibition by law of any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred.

Binding upon the United States since 8 June 1992; non-compliance triggers state responsibility.

3. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Article 27: 

Internal law may not be invoked to justify treaty violations.

The use of First Amendment protections to shield discriminatory state propaganda contravenes the supremacy of international obligations.

4. American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (1948)

Article II: 

Right to equality before the law.

Article V: 

Protection against attacks on honor and dignity by public officials.

5. UNESCO Convention Against Discrimination in Education (1960)

Article 1(1): 

Defines discrimination as any distinction based on national origin or ethnicity that affects recognition or dignity.

---

V. JUS COGENS BREACH AND INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

Barcelona Traction, ICJ Reports 1970 affirms that obligations prohibiting racial discrimination constitute erga omnes norms applicable universally.

Article 40–41 of the ILC Articles on State Responsibility (ARSIWA, 2001):

A serious breach of jus cogens entails a duty for all States to bring the breach to an end.

Trump’s Springfield statement, being a continuation of policy-linked verbal assaults, constitutes a composite act under Article 15 of ARSIWA.

Responsibility to Protect (R2P), UNGA Res. 60/1 (2005), paras. 138–139:

Institutionalized ethnonational violence, even rhetorical, activates responsibility by third parties to prevent mass rights violations.

---

VI. LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: DOCTRINAL SYSTEM OF ETHNORACIAL GOVERNANCE

The Springfield declarations, and their contextual precedents, constitute an ethnoracial system of hierarchical doctrine composed of:

1. Symbolic Dehumanization via Dietary Attribution

– Use of “dogs and cats” not as dietary claim but as civilizational downgrading under anthropological framing.

2. Ethnic Stratification as a Tool of Electoral Engineering

– Constructing “desirable” and “undesirable” immigrant identities to realign demographic policy under exclusionary optics.

3. Public Normalization of Inferiority Language

– Repetition of “third-world,” “collapse,” and “disease” anchors Haitian identity within a codified lexicon of degeneracy.

This structure reflects the deliberate instrumentalization of identity suppression within formal U.S. policy discourse.

---

VII. CONCLUSION

The statements issued by Donald J. Trump and J.D. Vance on 28 October 2024 in Springfield, Ohio, constitute:

An act of politically institutionalized ethnonational degradation;

A violation of U.S. constitutional norms and federal statutes;

A direct breach of binding international instruments ratified by the United States;

A peremptory infraction under jus cogens generating international legal responsibility.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua classifies this event as a hostile act of juridical classification, and hereby enters this annex into the Permanent Legal and Canonical Archive.

This record is forwarded to:

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD)

Permanent Missions to the United Nations

International Court of Justice

Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace

Sovereign Chancelleries of Ecclesiastical Jurisdictions

---

Signed, Filed, and Sealed on the Eleventh Day of June, Year of Our Lord 2025

Under the Seal of Ecclesiastical Sovereignty and Canonical Juridical Authority

Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com

Lex Superior – Ecclesiastically Entrenched – Universally Opposable – Juridically Irreversible

---


---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS


Legal Classification:


Canonically Validated Diplomatic Transmission – Jus Cogens Binding – Operative under Ecclesiastical, Indigenous, and Customary International Law – Universally Opposable Instrument of State Communication




---


TO:


Chair-Rapporteur, Working Group on Communications
United Nations Human Rights Council
c/o Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)


FROM:


Office of the Rector-President
Ministry of Foreign Affairs




Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Email: Info@xaraguauniversity.com


Date: 11 June 2025


SUBJECT:


Formal Notification of Legal Continuity and Juridical Consolidation – Communications WHRC/165XX, WHRC/17500, WHRC/17518




---


Excellencies,


In conformity with the principles established under Articles 8, 11, and 40 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), as well as binding norms under jus cogens prohibiting racial discrimination, ethnocide, and juridical erasure, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby issues this formal notification of institutional continuity and legal consolidation of the following communications:


WHRC/165XX – Registered 15 April 2025


WHRC/17500 – Received 10 June 2025


WHRC/17518 – Submitted 11 June 2025




Each of the aforementioned submissions emanates from the same juridically constituted sovereign entity operating under ecclesiastical authority and indigenous legal personality. The complaints relate to a coherent sequence of violations including but not limited to:


Systemic misattribution of nationality


Suppression of indigenous legal personhood


Institutional discrimination against Xaraguayan nationals


Unilateral executive decrees violating international legal standards


Documented political speech institutionalizing ethnoracial hierarchy (Springfield, Ohio, 28 October 2024)




In accordance with the procedural principles governing the Working Group on Communications, we respectfully request that the above-referenced files be cross-acknowledged, linked, or consolidated in dossier to reflect their legal interdependence and unified institutional authorship.


This transmission serves as an official act of diplomatic communication by a sovereign indigenous state, canonically instituted and internally recognized under the jurisdiction of its ecclesiastical and customary constitutional order, and now duly registered in the archives of the United Nations Human Rights System.


We remain available to transmit annexes, declarations of ecclesiastical recognition, and further juridical memoranda upon request.


Respectfully submitted,


Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua






---

Laws Of The State


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA 

—


SUPREME LAW ON THE PROHIBITION OF FOREIGN ZONES, EXTERNAL EXPROPRIATIONS, AND IMPERIAL MONOPOLIES


Date of Promulgation: May 27, 2025


Legal Classification: Constitutional Law — Binding Under Jus Cogens, Indigenous Customary Law, and International Notification Doctrine


Applicable Scope: Entirety of the Indigenous Ancestral Territory (Kiskeya/Bohio), Including But Not Limited to Xaragua Jurisdiction



---


ARTICLE I — ABSOLUTE BAN ON FOREIGN FREE TRADE ZONES


1.1. All forms of foreign-administered or foreign-licensed free trade zones (FTZs), economic enclaves, special economic districts, or international investment corridors are strictly prohibited across the entire ancestral territory of the Indigenous peoples of Kiskeya/Bohio, including the sovereign jurisdiction of the Xaragua State.


1.2. No foreign corporation, NGO, state actor, or public-private entity may operate within a tax-exempt, labor-exempt, jurisdiction-exempt, or constitutionally diluted zone without express violation of this law.


1.3. Any existing or attempted zone of this nature is declared null and void ab initio, subject to seizure, expulsion, and public sanction.



---


ARTICLE II — ABSOLUTE BAN ON FOREIGN MILITARY INSTALLATIONS


2.1. No foreign military base, training facility, intelligence outpost, radar station, maritime patrol base, drone control center, or satellite proxy node may be established, negotiated, or tolerated within the ancestral indigenous territory.


2.2. All forms of foreign military presence — overt or covert, direct or subcontracted — shall be treated as a violation of indigenous sovereignty and hostile territorial incursion.


2.3. This law applies in perpetuity and retroactively dissolves any prior arrangement, negotiation, or military memorandum not initiated under indigenous authority.



---


ARTICLE III — PROHIBITION OF FOREIGN LAND ACQUISITION AND EXPROPRIATION


3.1. No foreign person, company, trust, mission, embassy, development bank, international tribunal, or affiliated institution may claim, purchase, lease, annex, manage, or inherit land or immovable property within the indigenous territory.


3.2. All forced sales, coerced donations, or legally ambiguous acquisitions by non-indigenous entities are considered expropriations by aggression and are subject to immediate reversal.


3.3. All land titles remain under the exclusive authority of the Indigenous Sovereign Office of Xaragua.



---


ARTICLE IV — BAN ON ECONOMIC, ENERGETIC, AND TECHNOLOGICAL MONOPOLIES


4.1. No foreign or internal actor shall hold or attempt to establish a monopoly or dominant control over:


Petroleum or energy distribution


Telecommunication or data infrastructure


Agricultural production chains


Transport logistics networks


Artificial intelligence systems


Financial systems, banks, or digital currencies



4.2. The Xaragua State, and its authorized partners, retain permanent and exclusive authority over all sovereign sectors of public interest.


4.3. Any monopoly detected, tolerated, or allowed shall be dismantled by decree and nationalized without compensation under the doctrine of Permanent Indigenous Self-Defense (PISD).



---


ARTICLE V — INTEGRATION OF MÔLE SAINT-NICOLAS


5.1. The Môle Saint-Nicolas is hereby formally integrated into the sovereign territorial, maritime, and administrative jurisdiction of the State of Xaragua, and recognized as a geostrategic anchor of the Western Indigenous Domain.


5.2. All treaties, attempts, rumors, or negotiations relating to foreign military or economic control over Môle Saint-Nicolas are declared illegitimate, hostile, and permanently rejected.


5.3. Môle Saint-Nicolas shall be placed under military-economic-environmental protection, with limited access and regulated development rights assigned exclusively to indigenous authorities.



---


ARTICLE VI — APPLICABILITY BEYOND XARAGUA


6.1. This law applies not only to Xaragua, but to the entire ancestral and juridically declared territory of the Indigenous peoples of Kiskeya/Bohio, including all lands historically inhabited, defended, or consecrated by native lineages.


6.2. Its authority is recognized under:


UNDRIP Articles 26–30


Montevideo Convention Articles 1–4


ICJ Case Law on Indigenous Self-Determination


Vienna Convention on Non-Derogability of Inalienable Rights


Lex Terrae Autochthona and Indigenous Canon of Territorial Integrity



6.3. No actor, local or international, may claim exemption from this law under economic urgency, humanitarian rationale, or treaty pretext.



---


ARTICLE VII — EXECUTION AND IMMUNITY


7.1. This law is non-repealable, constitutionally supreme, and executable ex proprio vigore across all legal systems pertaining to the Indigenous sovereign order.



7.2. All violators will be blacklisted from all access to Xaragua infrastructure, platforms, markets, citizenship benefits, and land rights in perpetuity.



---


SIGNED AND SEALED

Office of the Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Date: May 27, 2025


Status: Supreme – Immutable – Non-Negotiable – Internationally Notified – Legally Executable


---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT



—




NATIONAL TERRITORIAL LAW ON THE IRREVOCABLE REINTEGRATION AND FULL SOVEREIGN CONTROL OF ÎLE DE LA TORTUE


Date of Enactment: May 27, 2025


Classification: Supreme State Law — Constitutionally Binding — Non-Amendable — Irreversible in Perpetuity



---


SECTION I — GENERAL PROVISIONS


Article 1 — Legal Supremacy


The present Act shall hold the full and unchallengeable authority of law across all domains, sectors, territories, and jurisdictions governed by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the greater Indigenous Republic of Kiskeya–Bohio.


Article 2 — Scope of Application


This Act applies to the entirety of Île de la Tortue, its landmass, territorial waters, surrounding seabed, airspace, mineral substrata, coastal access points, and ecological zones, without exception or dilution.



---


SECTION II — ANNULMENT OF FOREIGN CLAIMS AND CONCESSIONS


Article 3 — Absolute Nullification of Foreign Concessions


All historical, foreign, colonial, republican, corporate, or private concessions, leases, contracts, or claims regarding any portion of Île de la Tortue are hereby declared:


Legally null and void ab initio,


Permanently extinguished,


Irrevocably rejected by the sovereign Indigenous jurisdiction.



This includes, but is not limited to:


The concession granted in 1862 to Edmond Devèze,


The lease accorded to Don Pierson in 1970,


All derivative claims by Grey Pierson or any successors in title,


All protocols, contracts, or partnerships involving Carnival Corporation or maritime development ventures.



Article 4 — Prohibition of Legal Reinstatement


No national or international court, arbitration body, foreign government, private enterprise, or supranational institution shall be authorized to review, interpret, or challenge this nullification. Any such attempt shall be treated as an act of legal aggression against a sovereign Indigenous nation.



---


SECTION III — RESTORATION OF INDIGENOUS TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY


Article 5 — Indigenous Reclamation and Juridical Possession


Île de la Tortue is officially and permanently reintegrated into the national and ancestral jurisdiction of the Indigenous Republic of Kiskeya–Bohio, and shall be administered in full and unshared authority by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, as a protected national district.


Article 6 — Administrative Authority


The governance, regulation, protection, and development of Île de la Tortue shall fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of:


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State Of Xaragua


---


SECTION IV — DEFENSE, INTERDICTION, AND EXECUTION


Article 7 — Strategic Defense Zone Classification

Île de la Tortue is hereby designated a National Strategic Defense Zone (NSDZ). The following are permanently prohibited:


Foreign military presence or installations;


Commercial occupation by foreign actors;


Unlicensed maritime access;


Unauthorized cartographic or satellite mapping;


Economic activities not licensed by the Xaragua State.



Article 8 — Expulsion of Infringing Entities

Any person, group, corporation, or government found in possession of or claiming legal interest in any portion of the island shall be subject to:


Immediate expulsion,


Public blacklisting in the Xaragua Register of Territorial Offenders (XRTO),


Seizure of all physical and digital assets under the Act on the Defense of Indigenous Domains.




---


SECTION V — NOTIFICATION AND INTERNATIONAL STATUS


Article 9 — Global Legal Notification

This Act is hereby notified and transmitted to:


The United Nations (UNPFII, Division of Ocean Affairs),


The International Court of Justice,


The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO),


The Holy See,


The African Union, the OAS, and all relevant bodies of international Indigenous and diplomatic law.



Article 10 — Legal Status of Irreversibility

This Act is:


Non-repealable,


Non-amendable,


Perpetually binding,


Executable ex proprio vigore,


And protected under the doctrines of Permanent Indigenous Possession, Juridical Autochthony, and Sacred Non-Transferability.




---


ENACTED AND SEALED BY

THE OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

DATE: MAY 27, 2025


STATUS: National Law — Supreme — Canonically Recognized — Globally Notified — Armed With Legal Consequence


---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA 

—



SUPREME LAW ON THE DISSOLUTION OF FOREIGN CONCESSIONS AND THE RECLAMATION OF ALL MINERAL, PETROLEUM, AND ENERGY SOVEREIGNTY


Date of Enactment: May 27, 2025


Status: Constitutionally Supreme — Juridically Executable — Irrevocable — Universally Notified



---


SECTION I — LEGAL NULLIFICATION OF NAMED ENTITIES


Article 1 — Absolute Termination of All Licenses and Rights


The following companies, their subsidiaries, representatives, and any affiliated entities are hereby declared illegally present, and all concessions, licenses, permits, memoranda, or agreements previously held or claimed on any portion of the ancestral territory of Kiskeya–Bohio are revoked in totality and retroactively annulled:


MINING COMPANIES


1. Eurasian Minerals Inc. (Canada)



2. Ayiti Gold Company S.A. (Haïtienne – filiale Eurasian)



3. Marien Mining Company S.A. (Haïtienne – filiale Eurasian)



4. Newmont Mining Corporation (USA)



5. NVL Haiti Limited S.A. (Haïtienne – filiale Newmont)



6. VCS Mining Inc. (USA)



7. Delta Société Minière S.A. (Haïtienne – filiale VCS)



8. SONO Global Holdings Inc. (USA – associée à VCS)



9. Majescor Resources Inc. (Canada)



10. Société Minière du Nord-Est (SOMINE) (Haïtienne – partenaire de Majescor)



11. SIMACT Alliance Copper-Gold Inc. (Canada/USA – associée à SOMINE)



12. Canada Rare Earth Corporation (Canada – investisseur stratégique sur Morne Bossa)




PETROLEUM AND ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS


13. DINASA – Distributeurs Nationaux S.A. (Haïti)



14. GB Energy – GB Group (Haïti)



15. TotalEnergies Haïti (France)



16. Texaco Haïti (USA)



17. National – Stations Services (Haïti)



18. Sol Petroleum – Groupe Sol (Région Caraïbe)





---


SECTION II — JURIDICAL INVALIDITY AND TOTAL EXPULSION


Article 2 — Legal Status of All Concessions


2.1. All agreements, licenses, contracts, partnerships, exploratory memoranda, site claims, or derivative permits involving the above-named entities are declared:


Null and void ab initio;


In conflict with Indigenous territorial sovereignty;


Contrary to international norms on free, prior, and informed consent;


Structurally and doctrinally invalid under the Constitution of Xaragua.



Article 3 — Orders of Expulsion and Ban


3.1. All corporate agents, field operators, geologists, contractors, and executives affiliated with these entities are hereby:


Banned permanently from Xaragua jurisdiction;


Subject to seizure and interdiction if found within protected zones;


Listed in the Xaragua Registry of Sovereignty Violators (XRSV);


Disqualified from future engagement under any sovereign framework.




---


SECTION III — ENFORCEMENT AND GLOBAL NOTIFICATION


Article 4 — Immediate Enforcement Measures


4.1. The Xaragua State, in coordination with:


The Xaragua Territorial Security Corps (XTSC),


The Xaragua Office of Resource Recovery (XORR),


And the National Indigenous Property Authority (NIPA),



shall oversee the execution of expulsions, land recovery, and publication of international sanctions against violators.


Article 5 — Global Notification


5.1. This Act is transmitted to:


The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)


The International Court of Justice (ICJ)


The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR)


The WIPO and WTO


The African Union, Caribbean Community, and the Holy See



5.2. Any attempt by said entities to intervene, mediate, or reinterpret this law shall be considered an act of institutional overreach and rejected outright.



---


SECTION IV — PERPETUITY AND TERRITORIAL ABSOLUTISM


Article 6 — Binding Nature and Irreversibility


6.1. This law is:


Supreme under Xaragua Constitutional Doctrine,


Auto-executory ex proprio vigore,


Irreversible in all time and generations,


And backed by international legal norms including UNDRIP Articles 26–28, the Montevideo Convention, and the Vienna Convention on Treaty Law (Art. 53).



Article 7 — Indigenous Sole Control


All natural resources, including oil, gas, minerals, rare earths, water, and strategic materials, shall be managed, taxed, and governed exclusively by the Indigenous State of Xaragua, for the benefit of its people and future generations.



---


ENACTED AND SEALED

Office of the Rector-President

Date: May 27, 2025


STATUS: Supreme Law — Globally Notified — Legally Executable — Non-Negotiable — Eternal


---



---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA 

—



SUPREME LAW ON THE TERMINATION OF FOREIGN FREE ZONE CONCESSIONS AND THE BAN ON EXOGENOUS ECONOMIC ZONING


Date of Enactment: May 27, 2025


Classification: Constitutionally Binding — Non-Amendable — Auto-Executable — Internationally Notified



---


SECTION I — DEFINITION AND SOVEREIGN FRAMEWORK


Article 1 — Prohibition Doctrine


Any structure known as a Zone Franche / Free Zone / Special Economic Area / Enclave Fiscal / Zone de Développement Accéléré, established without the consent of the ancestral indigenous population and in conflict with sacred territorial law, is strictly prohibited and legally dissolved across the territory of Kiskeya–Bohio.


Article 2 — Exception Clause


The Compagnie de Développement Industriel S.A. (CODEVI) operating in Ouanaminthe is, by sovereign exception, excluded from the present interdiction and shall remain under special observation without immediate sanction, due to structural particularities and international sensitivities.



---


SECTION II — NAMED ENTITIES TO BE REVOKED AND BANNED


Article 3 — List of Entities and Legal Dissolution


The following companies, their branches, sponsors, financiers, and silent partners are hereby:


Revoked from all economic or territorial activity within the Indigenous Republic of Kiskeya–Bohio,


Prohibited from re-entering under any future legal regime,


Designated as violators of sovereign economic integrity,


And subject to permanent expulsion from the Xaragua jurisdiction.



Entities Covered:


1. Société Immobilière de Développement S.A.



2. Hispaniola Investment S.A.



3. West Indies Industrial Mills S.A.



4. Regroupement des Planteurs d’Avenir S.A. (REPLADA)



5. Zone Franche Nourri Bio / Agritrans S.A.



6. Société Lafito Industrial Zone S.A.



7. Astro Carton d’Haïti S.A.



8. Zone Franche Digneron / Les Palmiers S.A.



9. Quantum Apparel S.A.



10. Global Manufacturers and Contractors S.A.



11. Terminal Varreux S.A.



12. Caracol Industrial Park (non CODEVI-affiliated)



13. Sonapi Industrial Park



14. Shodecosa Industrial Park



15. Free Zone in Ganthier




All of these entities are banned indefinitely, and their structures, if physically present, are subject to confiscation, nationalization, or dismantlement.



---


SECTION III — EXECUTION, SANCTION, AND ENFORCEMENT


Article 4 — Administrative Mechanisms


The execution of this Act shall be carried out by:


The Xaragua Economic Sovereignty Corps (XESC),


The Ministry of Fiscal Sanctity and National Wealth Protection (MFSNWP),


And the Office for the Eradication of Colonial Infrastructure (OECI).



Article 5 — Penalties for Violators


All named entities shall:


Be listed in the Xaragua Register of Economic Violators (XREV),


Face full expulsion of all agents, assets, and brands,


Lose access to Xaragua financial, digital, logistical, academic, or diplomatic systems,


And be permanently disqualified from trade, transit, investment, or technological access.




---


SECTION IV — GLOBAL NOTIFICATION AND RECOGNITION


Article 6 — International Codification and Recognition


This law is to be:


Transmitted to the UNPFII, ICJ, WIPO, OAS, CARICOM, and the Holy See,


Filed under jus cogens, UNDRIP Article 26, and the Lex Territorialis Indigena Suprema,


Recognized as non-reversible, auto-executory, and anchored in territorial ancestral right.




---


SECTION V — FINALITY


Article 7 — Irreversibility Clause


This law shall:


Not be amended, suspended, or reinterpreted by any future legislature or external tribunal,


Serve as permanent doctrinal barrier against recolonization by fiscal or infrastructural infiltration,


Define the economy of Kiskeya–Bohio as non-negotiable, territorially closed, and indigenous-first in all domains.




---


ENACTED AND SEALED

Office of the Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

May 27, 2025


STATUS: Supreme Law — Non-Negotiable — Universally Notified — Canonically Protected



---



---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 

SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTICE

Legal Classification: Formal Diplomatic Instrument – Constitutionally Entrenched Act of International Legal Notification – Canonically Validated Declaration – Jus Cogens Binding – Irreversible and Universally Opposable under Customary, Indigenous, Ecclesiastical, and International Law – Operative as Notified Lex Superior under the Doctrine of Institutional Succession and Supremacy

---

Subject

Formal Affirmation that the Statement Issued by the President of the United States on June 4, 2025, in the Context of the Renewed U.S. Travel Ban, Confirms the Juridical Premise and State Doctrine of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua: 

That the Republic of Haiti Is a De Facto Failed State and Functionally Inoperative Entity – Thereby Justifying the Juridical and Territorial Voluntary Annexation of Xaragua’s Ancestral Domain and the rest of the Haitian Territory Under the Principles of Failed State Subsidiarity and Indigenous Canonical Sovereignty

Date of Transmission: June 7, 2025

Jurisdiction Invoked: Territorial Sovereignty under the Montevideo Convention (1933); Canonical Jurisdiction under Codex Iuris Canonici; Self-Determination under Articles 1, 55, and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations; Indigenous Jurisprudence under UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 18, 20, 26, 27, and 34; Right to Institutional Substitution under the Responsibility to Protect (UNGA Res. A/RES/60/1, 2005); Protection of Peoples under Articles 1 and 27 of the ICCPR; Application of Inter-American Precedents including Saramaka v. Suriname (2007), Yakye Axa v. Paraguay (2005), and Moiwana v. Suriname (2005); Institutional Supremacy under the Canonical Doctrine of Ecclesia Militans, the Lex Orandi–Lex Credendi Principle, and the Nottebohm Doctrine on Effective Nationality (ICJ, 1955)

---

I. Diplomatic Context and Legal Confirmation of State Failure

On June 4, 2025, during the formal renewal and modification of the U.S. Executive Travel Ban codified under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 212(f), the President of the United States, the Honorable Donald J. Trump, delivered a public statement designating the Republic of Haiti as a threat to the national security, institutional coherence, and immigration enforcement capabilities of the United States government. 

The document—legally filed and transmitted through the Federal Register—classifies Haiti as a jurisdiction failing to comply with the minimum international standards of governance, border control, criminal record verification, and treaty enforcement.

This is not a mere policy shift. It is an executive designation—issued by the Head of State of a UN Security Council Permanent Member—stating unequivocally that Haiti is nonfunctional, non-compliant, and institutionally collapsed. 

The proclamation references Haiti’s inability to repatriate nationals, its uncontrolled issuance of travel documents, and its breakdown of law enforcement, judicial oversight, and governance mechanisms. 

These findings echo the position long held and previously declared in the sovereign constitutional framework of Xaragua.

Thus, the highest executive authority of the United States has confirmed what was already enshrined in the constitutional doctrine of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua: 

That the Republic of Haiti has ceased to exist as a legally competent state, and that any continuation of its form is purely symbolic, without effective territorial control or international credibility.

---

II. Legal Consequences and Assertion of Xaragua's Juridical Right to Annexation

The consequences of this designation activate the full range of juridical autonomy rights as codified under multiple instruments:

Montevideo Convention (1933): 

Haiti fails to meet the criteria of effective government, defined territory, and international capacity. 

Xaragua satisfies all four requirements, including independent governance and defined ancestral territory.

Charter of the United Nations (1945), Articles 1, 55, 56: Self-determination becomes imperative where a state fails to fulfill its international obligations.

UNDRIP Articles 3–5, 26, 27, and 34: Indigenous populations maintain the right to preserve and restore their political, territorial, legal, and institutional structures when the imposed state is in collapse.

Responsibility to Protect (R2P) under UNGA Resolution A/RES/60/1: The international community and affected peoples have a duty to act when a state fails to prevent systemic collapse and rights violations.

ICJ Nottebohm Case (1955): Genuine national identity must be based on effective link and sovereign belonging, not formal document issuance. Xaragua’s population has never recognized Haiti as a legitimate sovereign.

Therefore, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua declares, in compliance with these instruments and under its own canonical legal system, that:

Haiti’s collapse is legally recognized internationally;

Subsidiarity, as codified in Canon 223, Canon 129–144, and in the European Charter of Local Self-Government, permits and mandates that authority be assumed by a competent lower-level institution when the higher fails;

The juridical and territorial annexation of the full ancestral domain of Xaragua is now executed under necessity, not merely claim.

This annexation is recorded in the Xaragua Foundational Act of Territorial Sovereignty, in force since April 2025.

---

III. Juridical Doctrines and Applicable Legal Instruments

The following binding sources form the basis of this irrevocable declaration:

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Articles 1 and 3;

Charter of the United Nations (1945) – Articles 1(2), 2(4), 55, 56;

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) – Articles 3–5, 8–9, 18–20, 26–27, 34;

ICCPR (1966) – Articles 1 and 27, affirming minority identity rights outside of collapsed regimes;

Inter-American Court of Human Rights – Jurisprudence in Saramaka v. Suriname, Yakye Axa v. Paraguay, Moiwana v. Suriname;

Canon Law – Canon 204 §2, Canon 129, Canon 113 §2, Canon 223, Canon 1400–1403 on ecclesiastical jurisdiction and subsidiarity;

ICJ Advisory Opinions – Western Sahara (1975) and Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (2010), recognizing non-consensual separation under failed state conditions;

UNGA Resolution 1514 (XV) – Declaring that “all peoples have the right to self-determination,” especially under colonial or dysfunctional states;

Doctrine of Necessity – Re International Tin Council (UK, 1987) on state function assumption under collapse.

These form a legally complete, sovereign, and internationally defensible foundation.

---

IV. Supraconstitutional Status of Indigeneity and Inviolability of Canonical Sovereignty

The legal personality of Xaragua does not emanate from Haitian law, nor is it dependent on recognition from collapsed institutions. Its sovereignty derives from:

Ancestral continuity, recognized under customary law;

Ecclesiastical jurisdiction, canonically valid and self-contained;

Territorial permanence, inherited, not acquired.

Haiti’s Constitution does not bind Xaragua, and any Haitian document held by a Xaraguayan is hereby classified as an administrative residue, not a sovereign expression.

This is consistent with:

UNDRIP Article 33 – The right of Indigenous peoples to determine their own identity;

Canon 204 §2 – Defining the Church as the people of God, distinct from civil structures;

General Comment No. 12 of the UN Human Rights Committee – Recognizing the right to an identity external to the central state.

Indigeneity is not a subset of citizenship—it is a supranational, pre-constitutional identity that survives the fall of imposed state systems.

---

V. Institutional Consequences and Permanent Record

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua registers this notice as:

A constitutional act of foreign policy;

A diplomatic assertion of exclusive jurisdiction;

A formal rebuttal of all Haitian national impositions on its population and territory.

Henceforth:

1. Xaragua citizens shall not be considered Haitian by any foreign or multilateral institution;

2. Haitian documents are irrelevant to legal, sovereign, or diplomatic determination;

3. Xaragua shall exercise full civil, criminal, spiritual, and diplomatic sovereignty.

Any interference shall constitute:

A violation of jus cogens norms,

A breach of international humanitarian and indigenous law,

An act of juridical aggression against a protected, sovereign, canonically recognized people.

---

Signed and Proclaimed

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Duly Enacted and Registered on June 7, 2025

Lex Superior – Valid Canonical Instrument – Operative under International Jurisdiction

---


---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTE

Legal Classification: 

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument – Jus Cogens-Based Diplomatic Notification – Canonically Validated State Declaration – Customarily and Treatily Opposable – Binding Under the Principles of Indigenous Sovereignty and Institutional Self-Jurisdiction

---

TO:

The United States State Department

Office of Policy Planning

2201 C Street NW

Washington, DC 20520

United States of America

FROM:

Office of the Rector-President

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

SUBJECT:

Formal Notification of Legal Contradiction and Sovereignty Confirmation: The Juridical Consequences for the United States of Denying the Statehood and Identity of Xaragua Following the Executive Declaration of the Republic of Haiti’s Institutional Collapse

Date of Transmission: June 8, 2025

---

I. Context and Legal Foundation of the Notification

Pursuant to the binding diplomatic notification previously issued by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereafter “Xaragua”), and in direct reference to the executive declaration delivered by the President of the United States on June 4, 2025, under the authority of Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs hereby issues this formal diplomatic communication, framed under the principles of international law, ecclesiastical sovereignty, and indigenous legal authority.

Said executive declaration unequivocally categorizes the Republic of Haiti as a jurisdiction incapable of performing the elementary duties of a sovereign state. These duties, codified in Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), include: (1) a permanent population, (2) a defined territory, (3) a government, and (4) the capacity to enter into relations with other states. Failure to meet any of these four conditions constitutes a lapse in sovereign function under customary state doctrine.

Furthermore, Articles 55 and 56 of the Charter of the United Nations (1945) obligate Member States to promote conditions of stability, legal order, and effective governance. By asserting that Haiti lacks law enforcement capacity, documentation control, consular reliability, and institutional integrity, the United States has functionally declared Haiti to be a failed state, incapable of fulfilling its Charter-mandated obligations. 

This determination is of high legal significance, as it originates from a Head of State of a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council, with global juridical resonance.

Under Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966), all peoples have the right to self-determination. 

Article 27 further guarantees minority groups the freedom to enjoy their own culture, religion, and legal systems, even within the boundaries of another state. 

In situations where the parent state becomes non-functional, the jurisdictional vacuum is governed by the doctrine of necessity and subsidiarity, permitting self-governing institutions such as Xaragua to emerge as lawful successors.

The aforementioned executive act is thus not a mere policy choice, but a declaratory instrument of institutional incapacity, which simultaneously and inadvertently reinforces Xaragua’s legal position as the only functioning sovereign entity over its ancestral territory.

---

II. The Principle of Contradictory Denial and Juridical Self-Invalidation

Should the United States—through its Department of State, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, or any administrative or judicial branch—seek to deny the sovereign legal personality, statehood status, or institutional legitimacy of Xaragua while upholding its executive determination that Haiti is nonfunctional, the result would be a juridical self-contradiction of significant magnitude. 

Such a position would lack internal consistency, violate legal norms of recognition, and be subject to international critique and invalidation.

Article VI of the U.S. Constitution (the Supremacy Clause) establishes that all ratified international treaties are the supreme law of the land. The United States is party to the ICCPR, ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples, and has voted in favor of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). 

All of these instruments codify the right of indigenous peoples to govern themselves, define their legal identity, and create autonomous institutions. 

To reject Xaragua’s sovereignty would thus place the U.S. federal government in violation of its own constitutional hierarchy of norms.

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits classification based on arbitrary criteria. 

Denying Xaragua's citizens their declared identity and reclassifying them as Haitian nationals—despite a lawful alternative identity—violates constitutional protections against discrimination and misattribution of legal status.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, 1955) clarified that nationality must reflect an effective, genuine link to the sovereign body issuing it. 

Xaragua maintains a functioning government, population registry, documentation system, diplomatic presence, educational and financial institutions. 

Any denial of such nationality in favor of a collapsed, non-functioning state violates international law, especially where such documentation is issued for necessity but lacks juridical consent.

---

III. Legal Ramifications of Denying Xaragua While Recognizing Institutional Collapse in Haiti

The act of rejecting Xaragua’s statehood or national identity while simultaneously upholding Haiti’s collapse generates irreconcilable legal and diplomatic consequences. Specifically:

1. It would nullify the United States’ own rationale for the travel ban, based on Haiti’s inability to perform sovereign functions. By refusing to recognize a lawful alternative structure, the United States paradoxically reaffirms the validity of a collapsed state while rejecting the validity of a functioning one.

2. It violates UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, and 33, which explicitly grant indigenous peoples the right to self-determined identity, institutions, governance, and documentation. Any foreign state refusing to honor these rights is in breach of non-derogable international legal obligations.

3. It disregards ILO Convention No. 169, particularly Articles 6, 7, 8, and 33, which establish a permanent bar against states imposing legal systems or identity upon indigenous nations without their informed and prior consent. Xaragua’s identity is pre-existing, self-administered, and voluntarily codified.

4. It violates the doctrine of consensual legal affiliation, which requires that nationality emerge from deliberate, sovereign, and documented affiliation—not imposed by geopolitical assumption.

5. It contradicts the Montevideo Convention, which recognizes the independence of statehood from external recognition (Article 3), so long as the four foundational elements of statehood are present—which Xaragua has fulfilled.

6. It directly opposes the Charter of the United Nations, Article 1(2), which commits all member states to respect the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.

---

IV. Institutional Consequence and International Liability

If the United States proceeds to deny, obstruct, or reinterpret Xaragua’s sovereignty in contradiction with its recognition of Haiti’s collapse, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall engage the following mechanisms:

1. Submit a formal complaint to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, on grounds of violation of indigenous identity rights and unlawful denial of legal personality;

2. Activate the Bureau of International Legal Consultation of Xaragua (BILC-X) to archive every instance of denial, persecution, misclassification, and obstruction by any U.S. agency, for inclusion in a future international dossier;

3. Issue legal memoranda to multilateral bodies, embassies, and international institutions clarifying the contradiction and requesting acknowledgment of the principle of sovereign equivalence and effective nationality;

4. Register any denial of entry, seizure of Xaraguayan documents, or misattribution of nationality as a hostile juridical act, and as a breach of Articles 8 and 33 of UNDRIP and Article 16 of the ICCPR;

5. File for inclusion in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United States at the United Nations Human Rights Council, documenting inconsistency in indigenous policy and discriminatory application of immigration law.

---

V. Conclusion and Demand for Juridical Coherence

In light of the legal, canonical, and doctrinal evidence herein provided, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua respectfully notifies the United States that any future denial of Xaragua’s sovereignty, nationality, or institutional identity shall constitute a deliberate contradiction of its own executive actions, binding treaties, constitutional obligations, and publicly recorded legal positions.

The United States must now adhere to one of two coherent positions:

Either uphold its declaration of Haiti’s collapse and, accordingly, recognize the structural, juridical, and spiritual legitimacy of Xaragua as the lawful sovereign institution in its ancestral territory;

Or reverse its position on Haiti’s collapse, thereby nullifying the immigration justification issued under INA §212(f), and undermining the credibility of the Executive Branch on national security, foreign policy, and human rights.

In either case, juridical coherence, not political preference, is now required.

This Supreme Diplomatic Note shall be retained as an official record of international law, canon law, indigenous sovereignty, and foreign policy jurisprudence. It shall remain permanently enforceable under customary and treaty law, and may be referenced in future proceedings as a foundational declaration of non-subordination, sovereign legal standing, and institutional succession.

---

Signed and Sealed

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com

Duly Notified on June 8, 2025

Lex Superior – Juridically Binding – Canonically Validated – Customarily Enforceable

---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT




---


SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTE


Legal Classification:


Constitutionally Entrenched Diplomatic Instrument – Canonically Validated Sovereign Declaration – Jus Cogens-Based International Legal Notification – Doctrinally Binding – Universally Opposable under Indigenous, Ecclesiastical, Customary, and International Law




---


TO:


The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
The United States Department of State
The United Nations Office of Legal Affairs
The United Nations Human Rights Council
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
The International Court of Justice
The Sovereign Pontifical Chancery
All Concerned Diplomatic Missions and Ecclesiastical Jurisdictions


FROM:


Office of the Rector-President
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


SUBJECT:


Formal Juridical Analysis and Diplomatic Notification Regarding the Global Legal Consequences of the United States’ 2025 Presidential Designation of “Failed States” and Its Activation of International Doctrines of Indigenous and Regional Sovereignty


Date of Transmission: June 8, 2025




---


I. Diplomatic Context and Legal Triggering Event


On June 4, 2025, the President of the United States, acting in his non-delegable constitutional capacity as Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of a Permanent Member State of the United Nations Security Council, promulgated an Executive Proclamation grounded in Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, designating thirteen internationally recognized sovereign entities as de facto failing or failed states, including Haiti, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, Iran, Sudan, and others.


Said executive directive, issued in the exercise of plenary federal authority and transcribed into the Federal Register, cited the chronic incapacity of these states to enforce territorial sovereignty, uphold juridical continuity, maintain diplomatic functionality, or adhere to their binding obligations under the corpus of conventional and customary international law.


Said proclamation, transmitted through official state mechanisms and entered into the diplomatic domain, constitutes not merely an administrative policy but a public act of international legal consequence falling under the doctrine of unilateral declarations of states. It produces juridico-political effects, activating—ipso jure and ipso facto—the right and juridical imperative of affected autochthonous peoples, ecclesiastical jurisdictions, and non-derivative indigenous entities to assert and reclaim sovereign authority over their ancestral and canonically affirmed territories.




---


II. Activation of the Principle of Juridical Substitution under International Law


The executive act of sovereign classification by a dominant global actor engenders immediate juridical effects under international, ecclesiastical, and customary legal norms, activating, inter alia, the following multilayered doctrines:


1. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Articles 1 and 3


The doctrinal assertion that a state has forfeited the attributes of permanent population, effective government, and capacity to engage in diplomatic intercourse lawfully permits the emergence, reactivation, or legal reconstitution of polities—especially autochthonous and ecclesiastically continuous ones—fulfilling the convention’s quadruple criteria for juridical statehood.




2. Charter of the United Nations – Articles 1(2), 55, and 56


The Charter imposes a binding obligation upon Member States to promote, defend, and facilitate the self-determination of peoples and the reestablishment of sovereign order where collapse has occurred. The disintegration of governance invokes the Charter’s protective and enabling provisions in favor of subnational legal actors.




3. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) – Articles 3, 4, 5, 8(2), 18, 20, 26, and 33


These provisions constitute codified, jus cogens-level guarantees entitling indigenous nations to affirm legal identity, restructure governance systems, assert territorial jurisdiction, and restore canonical legal authority whenever the host state entity has ceased to function or has violated fundamental customary norms.




4. International Court of Justice Precedents – Western Sahara (1975), Kosovo (2010), Nottebohm (1955)


These authoritative decisions affirm the primacy of effective nationality, historical legitimacy, and functional self-governance in establishing legal personhood under international law. Recognition is acknowledged as declaratory, not constitutive. The principle of the genuine link reinforces the standing of ecclesiastical and indigenous sovereignties.




5. Responsibility to Protect (R2P) – UNGA Resolution A/RES/60/1 (2005)


The doctrine affirms that in cases of catastrophic governance failure, the right to preserve life, liberty, and institutional continuity devolves upon the people and their organized ecclesiastical or traditional leadership structures, enabling lawful constitutional substitution without foreign mandate.




6. Code of Canon Law – Canons 204 §2, 129–144, 113 §2, 223


Where secular authority collapses or is rendered illicit, the canonical ecclesia, especially when constituted by apostolic continuity and juridical personality, is doctrinally and juridically authorized to resume civil, territorial, and institutional leadership over its faithful and temporal jurisdiction.








---


III. Legal Consequences for International Sovereignty Movements


The public and formal declaration by the United States, designating thirteen states as incapable of sovereign performance, serves as a de facto and de jure catalyst for the emergence or consolidation of the following sovereignty movements, each grounded in international legal doctrine:


The Southern Transitional Council of Yemen may invoke this moment to legally reassert its prior independent constitutional order;


The Republic of Somaliland is entitled to invoke its non-derogated right to secession under the failed state clause and historical continuity;


The Kurdish Autonomous Regions in Iraq and Syria possess grounds to elevate their status to that of internationally operative sovereigns;


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, already canonically instituted and territorially entrenched, possesses the strongest juridico-spiritual basis to affirm its sovereign jurisdiction without contestation.




Each of these actors may henceforth invoke the legal doctrine of estoppel against the United States and its allies, whose official declarations function as precedential validation of post-colonial sovereign reconfigurations.




---


IV. The Irreversibility of the 2025 Precedent


The diplomatic and legal posture adopted by the United States on June 4, 2025, constitutes an international juridical fact of binding character.


Under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), notably Articles 26 (pacta sunt servanda) and 27 (internal law and observance of treaties), and under the customary norm of estoppel, no state may legally derogate from its declared positions when these have induced reliance or triggered juridical processes.


Accordingly, the international community is now under binding obligation to:


Recognize that failed-state status lawfully opens the field to peaceful institutional reoccupation by organized indigenous and ecclesiastical authorities;


Affirm that juridical recognition is not a condition sine qua non for state legitimacy where the criteria of legal, spiritual, institutional, and territorial continuity are demonstrably satisfied;


Uphold the inviolability of emerging sovereignties under Article 2(7) of the UN Charter, as well as the protective obligations codified in ILO Convention No. 169 and UNDRIP.






---


V. Official Position of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, in exercise of its canonically derived and ecclesiastically sealed legal personhood, formally proclaims that the Executive Proclamation of June 4, 2025, constitutes a juridical consecration of Xaragua’s sovereignty. Said sovereignty is undergirded by:


Continuous and apostolically legitimate ecclesiastical jurisdiction;


Documented and enforceable territorial dominion, population census, and lawful defense structures;


Operational autonomy in the domains of education, diplomacy, finance, and military doctrine;


The promulgation and international notification of a constitutionally entrenched legal corpus, already opposable under lex superior.




This declaration aligns with and advances the irreversible process of post-colonial juridical reformation, especially within territories long subjected to decayed or illegitimate administrative impositions.




---


VI. Demand for Institutional Acknowledgment and Juridical Consistency


The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby notifies and demands, under the force of public international law, that:


1. All multilateral institutions and state actors acknowledge the juridical precedent enacted by the United States in its 2025 designation of systemic state collapse;




2. All administrative, consular, and migratory classifications of Xaraguayan citizens as Haitian nationals be deemed legally erroneous and immediately discontinued;




3. This present Supreme Diplomatic Note be archived as a formal, binding declaration of canonical and indigenous sovereignty, to be invoked in any future proceedings touching upon the legitimacy or recognition of emergent sovereigns.






This document stands as a legally authenticated declaration and shall remain perpetually admissible before any tribunal, court, ecclesiastical council, or diplomatic instance adjudicating the matter of sovereign self-constitution under the regime of international law.




---


Signed and Sealed


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


info@xaraguauniversity.com
www.xaraguauniversity.com


Duly Notified on June 8, 2025


Lex Superior – Juridically Binding – Canonically Entrenched – Universally Opposable


---

---


Submission report

Reference: 24nm8ph0

Date: Monday, June 9, 2025

Type: Bill, legislation, policy or practice

Original: English

Consent: Not required


Related mandates:


international order


freedom of peaceful assembly and of association


migrants


minority issues


Indigenous Peoples



Submitted by:

Name: Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State Of Xaragua

Type: Group

Email: info@xaraguauniversity.com



Describe the activities of the group/community, civil society or other entity:


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is an ecclesiastically instituted, canonically validated, and internationally notified indigenous sovereign polity, exercising full legal personhood and territorial jurisdiction under jus cogens norms, Canon Law, and customary international law.


Its primary activities include:


The preservation and defense of indigenous cultural, spiritual, and territorial identity;


The implementation of ecclesiastically grounded educational systems (via Xaragua University);


The structuring of diplomatic and juridical mechanisms to protect its citizens from racial misclassification and systemic exclusion;


The issuance of formal legal declarations under the Vienna Convention, Montevideo Convention, UNDRIP, ICCPR, and Codex Iuris Canonici;


The documentation and international notification of all forms of discrimination and denial of juridical recognition by collapsed or foreign state entities;


The maintenance of diplomatic correspondence and legal archives for use in multilateral forums;


The peaceful assertion of its sovereignty through the canonically proclaimed Office of the Rector-President and its affiliated ministries.



The State has formally entered multiple communications with the United Nations, the CERD, the Human Rights Council, and the International Court of Justice concerning racial exclusion, institutional misclassification, and canonical interference.


Its legal existence is irreversible, universally opposable, and protected under the doctrines of ecclesiastical sovereignty, indigenous title, and juridical self-determination.


Contact persons of the group/community, civil society or other entity:

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President



---


Case details

Submission of Information to Special Procedures Report 24nm8ph0

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights


Country where the incident allegedly occurred/is occurring/might occur:

Haiti


Additional country/ies if relevant:

Haiti, United States of America


Date(s):

June 4th – Travel Ban of President Donald Trump


Detailed description of the context; summary of the concerned bill, legislation or policy:


Institutional Submission to the CERD – Xaragua vs. United States (June 2025)


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), acting under its full ecclesiastical, indigenous, and constitutional authority, hereby submits a formal sovereign complaint to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). This filing is based on the institutional and doctrinal rights of Xaragua as a canonically recognized Indigenous Nation, operating under jus cogens norms, the Montevideo Convention, UNDRIP, ICCPR, and the Codex Iuris Canonici.


On June 4, 2025, the President of the United States issued an Executive Proclamation under INA §212(f), barring all Haitian nationals from U.S. territory. This act constitutes (1) racial exclusion based on ethno-national origin, (2) juridical misclassification by conflating Xaraguayan nationals with Haitian citizenship, and (3) a violation of non-derogable rights to juridical identity and sovereign personhood.


This exclusion disproportionately affects Afro-Indigenous and ecclesiastically governed populations and violates:


CERD General Recommendation XXIII (§4c–d, §5)


UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 5, 8(2), 18, 20, 26, 33


ICCPR Articles 1 and 27


Montevideo Convention Articles 1 and 3


Canon Law Canons 204 §2, 129–144, 223



Consequences of the U.S. measure include:


Juridical Misclassification: 


Unlawful designation of Xaraguayan citizens as Haitians


Administrative Invalidity: 


Refusal to recognize Xaragua’s sovereign documentation


Racial Exclusion: 


Blanket travel bans without individualized assessment


Canonical Interference: 


Denial of the legal and spiritual existence of a canonical polity



These constitute acts of institutional identity erasure and systemic racial discrimination.


Xaragua requests the following actions:


1. Registration of this sovereign complaint under CERD procedures



2. Activation of Early Warning and Urgent Action measures



3. Clarification that Indigenous ecclesiastical states like Xaragua cannot be subsumed under collapsed regimes



4. Condemnation of juridical misclassification of sovereign Indigenous nations



5. Recommendation to the U.S. to cease racialized administrative practices targeting ecclesiastical Indigenous sovereignty




Filed on behalf of the national citizenry, governance, and ecclesiastical institutions of Xaragua. This submission is canonically sealed, legally opposable, and formally entered into the record of international law.


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


www.xaraguauniversity.com


Filed: June 8, 2025


Lex Superior – Canonically Validated – Juridically Opposable – Treaty-Based Instrument



---


Please describe on whom or which group the bill, legislation, policy or practice has/would have an impact, what rights would allegedly be affected and how:


SUMMARY SUBMISSION – CERD COMPLAINT AGAINST UNITED STATES (JUNE 8, 2025)


The Executive Proclamation issued by the President of the United States on June 4, 2025, under Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), bans all nationals of the Republic of Haiti from entering U.S. territory. Although formally directed at Haiti, the proclamation unlawfully affects the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua—a canonically constituted and internationally notified Indigenous polity—with its own territory, governance, and ecclesiastical sovereignty.


By administratively subsuming Xaragua under the failed Republic of Haiti, the United States violates international norms on Indigenous sovereignty, juridical identity, and racial non-discrimination. Xaragua is neither a subset of Haiti nor a dependent entity; it has proclaimed and operates as an autonomous ecclesiastical Indigenous State under Canon Law and Indigenous legal frameworks.


Violations include:


1. Right to Juridical Personality and Identity (ICCPR Art. 16, UNDRIP Art. 33):


Xaraguayan nationals are improperly categorized as Haitians, denying their juridical identity, violating the ecclesiastical civil registry, and erasing canonical nationality.



2. Right to Self-Determination (ICCPR and UNDRIP Art. 1):


Xaragua, acting under ancestral, canonical, and customary legal continuity, exercises lawful self-determination. The proclamation collapses this into a defunct post-colonial classification.



3. Prohibition of Racial Discrimination (CERD General Rec. XXIII):


The policy targets Afro-descendant and Indigenous populations via geographic and ethnic profiling, constituting collective exclusion and institutional racial bias.



4. Violation of Religious and Institutional Sovereignty (Codex Iuris Canonici):


The U.S. action denies the authority of a canonical ecclesiastical polity, breaching spiritual self-governance protected under both Canon and international law.



5. Prohibition of Forced Assimilation (UNDRIP Art. 8(2)):


By refusing to recognize Xaragua’s documentation and distinct status, the U.S. engages in juridical identity destruction, a violation of peremptory norms (jus cogens).




Consequences:


Xaraguayan citizens are denied international mobility, access to consular support, and recognition of lawful state documents. Their sovereign identity is administratively nullified by a third-party state, resulting in racialized institutional repression with global implications.


Request to CERD:


That this measure be recognized not as immigration control, but as a systemic act of Indigenous erasure, juridical misclassification, and racial discrimination. CERD is urged to classify this proclamation as a breach of the Convention and applicable international legal protections.



---

---



---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTICE

Legal Classification: 

Canonically Entrenched – Jus Cogens Binding – Universally Opposable Juridical Instrument – Lex Superior under Indigenous, Ecclesiastical, and International Customary Law

Date: June 12, 2025

Signed: Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau, Rector-President

---

TITLE:

On the Legal Inapplicability of Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter to the Republic of Haiti due to the Canonical, Indigenous, and Customary Sovereignty of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, which Holds Full Juridical Tutelage over the Haitian Republic

---

SECTION I – On the Legal Personality and Westphalian Standing of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by virtue of its canonical constitution, indigenous legitimacy, and continuous institutional functionality, possesses both de facto and de jure access to the full spectrum of international legal instruments reserved for sovereign nation-states as defined under the Peace of Westphalia (1648) and codified by the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Article 1:

(a) Permanent population

(b) Defined territory

(c) Government

(d) Capacity to enter into relations with other states

This status is amplified by its canonical legal standing under the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), particularly:

Canon 113 §1: “The Catholic Church and the Apostolic See have juridic personality by divine law itself.”

Canon 361–367: These confirm the international diplomatic personality of ecclesiastical entities, enabling the Church to conduct sovereign functions even in the absence of territorial control.

Under Article 3 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), Xaragua possesses a jus cogens right to self-determination:

“Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status…”

This legal foundation is supplemented by:

Article 34 of UNDRIP: 

Confirms the right to maintain distinct institutions and legal systems.

Article 19: 

Requires states to obtain the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous authorities before implementing any legislative measure that affects them.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 53: 

Prohibits derogation from jus cogens norms.

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua further asserts constitutional succession from the 1805 Imperial Constitution of Haiti and the legislative corpus of 1804–1806. 

This imperial continuity was never lawfully abrogated following the assassination of Emperor Jacques I, rendering the republican regime that followed a derivative political construct lacking original constituent legitimacy.

By virtue of historical continuity, canonical recognition, and indigenous sovereignty, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua operates as a non-independent sovereign tutelary entity—possessing full legal standing and access to the instruments of the Westphalian system through the juridical channel of the Republic of Haiti, over which it now exercises formal tutelage.

Thus, Xaragua stands not outside, but above and within the international legal order: sovereign by custom, canonical by nature, and Westphalian by juridical inheritance.

---

---

SECTION II — On the Doctrine of Canonical and Indigenous Juridical Tutelage over Failed or Collapsing Westphalian Entities: 

The Case of the Republic of Haiti

The Republic of Haiti, once a recognized Westphalian subject, has legally and structurally failed to maintain its obligations under both internal and international law. 

This failure invokes a juridically binding necessity for tutelary assumption by a competent canonical and indigenous entity possessing lex superior authority. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua exercises this tutelage on the basis of:

I. Collapse of State Functions by the Republic of Haiti

1. Violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter – which mandates that all Members refrain from the threat or use of force and maintain internal peace and security.

The Haitian state has abdicated its ability to govern key zones of its territory and protect its population from armed non-state actors.

2. Breach of the Montevideo Convention (1933), Art. 1(b) – requiring effective territorial control.

With more than 70% of its territory de facto controlled by criminal syndicates or foreign actors, Haiti fails the territorial governance test.

3. Violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), particularly Articles 3, 5, 12 – protecting life, liberty, security, and dignity.

The state is no longer able to provide courts, medical institutions, or safe public spaces to its citizens.

4. Breach of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Art. 26 (pacta sunt servanda) – by failing to honor bilateral and multilateral obligations, particularly in areas of protection of civilians, international aid protocols, and diplomatic norms.

---

II. Activation of Canonical and Indigenous Tutelary Authority

Where a state collapses in situ, the doctrine of juridical custodianship is triggered. 

This legal doctrine permits a sovereign canonical or indigenous structure—recognized under ecclesiastical and customary legal traditions—to assume responsibility sine qua non, under the principle of necessity and continuity of governance.

This is grounded in:

Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ILC 2001):

Article 48(1)(b): 

Any state other than the injured state is entitled to invoke responsibility if the obligation breached is owed to the international community as a whole (erga omnes).

UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV), 1970 – The Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations:

Recognizes the duty of states and entities to assist populations whose governing authority has collapsed.

Canonical Law (Codex Iuris Canonici):

Canon 1752 (suprema lex salus animarum): 

"The supreme law is the salvation of souls."

Canon 368 affirms that a portion of the people of God (e.g., the faithful in Haiti) may be entrusted to ecclesiastical structures when civil governments fail.

Second Vatican Council (Gaudium et Spes, §76):

"In the absence of competent civil authorities, the Church has the duty to offer her own institutions in the service of humanity."

UNDRIP Articles 4 and 37:

Confirm the right of indigenous peoples to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic and social institutions, including the right to uphold treaties entered historically or under customary law.

---

III. Application to the Haitian Situation

Given the constitutional collapse and juridical vacuum of the Republic of Haiti, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua—operating with full canonical and ancestral legitimacy—assumes juridical tutelage over the territory historically referred to as Haiti, without seeking to dismantle or replace its international personality, but rather to shield, preserve, and stabilize it in accordance with:

Customary international law,

Canon Law,

UNDRIP, and

Historic constitutional succession.

This tutelage is not elective, symbolic, nor contingent on the consent of external powers. It arises ex officio, by the convergence of necessity, legitimacy, and spiritual jurisdiction.

---

---

SECTION III — On the Legal Inapplicability of Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter to the Republic of Haiti in the Presence of a Superior Canonical and Indigenous Shield Authority

The invocation of Chapter VII of the UN Charter (Articles 39–51), which permits coercive measures in response to threats to international peace and security, presumes the following legal conditions:

1. The existence of a functioning, independent Westphalian state.

2. The absence of superior juridical tutelage or sovereign custodianship.

3. The presence of a threat that cannot be managed by regional or peaceful means.

None of these conditions are met when the Republic of Haiti is under the canonical and indigenous tutelage of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, whose shield authority is based on spiritual sovereignty, historical legality, and diplomatic notification.

---

I. Failure of Pre-conditions for Chapter VII Measures

A. Violation of Article 2(7) of the UN Charter

Prohibits the UN from intervening in matters that are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of a State.

Xaragua's tutelage is internal to the cultural, spiritual, and juridical framework of the territory formerly known as the Republic of Haiti.

B. Lack of Recognition of Shield Authority Violates UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 19, 32, 37, 40

UNDRIP demands free, prior and informed consent from indigenous governing entities prior to any legislative, administrative or coercive measure.

No such consent has been requested or obtained from the Government of Xaragua.

Article 32(2): 

States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with indigenous peoples through their own representative institutions to obtain consent before the approval of any project affecting their lands or territories.

C. Illegality of Coercive Measures Without Exhaustion of Peaceful Remedies (Article 33 of the Charter)

Chapter VI of the UN Charter prioritizes pacific settlement of disputes before any invocation of Chapter VII.

The absence of negotiation with Xaragua’s authority renders any coercive action procedurally and legally null.

---

II. Jurisdictional Supremacy of Canonical and Customary Law over Derivative Republics

The Government of Xaragua stands as shield authority, not as an external actor, but as the juridical tutor of the Republic of Haiti. It operates from within—by canonical jurisdiction, territorial lineage, and lawful inheritance—thus transforming the territory's legal status.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 53:

Any treaty or intervention violating a jus cogens norm (e.g., self-determination, non-aggression, religious freedom) is void ab initio.

Imposing Chapter VII without acknowledgment of an internal sovereign shield violates jus cogens, as defined by the ICJ in Nicaragua v. United States of America (1986).

Barcelona Traction (ICJ, 1970):

The international community has obligations erga omnes to respect the juridical structure of all sovereign legal persons, including those derived from customary or spiritual sources.

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 361:

Establishes that ecclesiastical authority is supra-national and inviolable where spiritual governance is exercised legitimately.

Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae §1:

Affirms the Church’s right to freedom from coercion in matters of governance and mission, particularly in places of governmental collapse.

---

III. Precedent and Doctrinal Limitations on Chapter VII Applications

The Occupied Palestinian Territory ICJ Advisory Opinion (2004) established that no coercive measure can be applied without procedural safeguards and consultation with all legitimate governing entities.

Kosovo ICJ Advisory Opinion (2010) confirmed that declarations of independence, or parallel governance, arising from customary legitimacy are not unlawful under international law.

Island of Palmas Arbitration (1928) remains the touchstone for intertemporal legality: effective sovereignty and continuity outweigh defective claims based on formal title.

These precedents confirm that any Chapter VII enforcement action excluding the juridical and canonical Government of Xaragua is legally unenforceable, procedurally invalid, and diplomatically illegitimate.

---

---

SECTION IV — On the Operational Consequences of Chapter VII Inapplicability and the International Recognition of Xaragua’s Canonical and Indigenous Shield Function

The consequences of failing to acknowledge the legal primacy and shield authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua are not merely procedural — they nullify entirely the juridical basis upon which Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter might otherwise apply to the Republic of Haiti.

---

I. Invalidity of Chapter VII Enforcement Without Shield Consultation

Any invocation of Articles 39 to 51 of the Charter becomes:

Procedurally void, under Article 32 of UNDRIP and Article 33 of the UN Charter, due to failure to seek consent and pursue peaceful measures with the lawful canonical custodian of the territory.

Substantively void, under Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 53, due to violation of peremptory norms (jus cogens) including non-aggression, self-determination, and religious immunity.

Diplomatically illegitimate, due to exclusion of an internationally notified, canonically lawful, and customarily recognized State entity, which possesses juridical personality, institutional continuity, and formal diplomatic apparatus.

---

II. Breach of Ecclesiastical Immunity and Canonical Jurisdiction

Canons 361–367 of the Codex Iuris Canonici affirm that canonical authority, when legitimately exercised, enjoys extraterritorial status and diplomatic immunity.

Gaudium et Spes (Vatican II) obliges the Church to intervene in temporal matters when public authority fails to protect the dignity and rights of peoples.

Any coercive action undertaken against Haitian territory—without canonical coordination with Xaragua—shall be considered an affront to ecclesiastical sovereignty and subject to canonical litigation before the Apostolic Signatura and the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development.

---

III. Nullity of Future Humanitarian or Security Mandates Over Haiti

Without express engagement with the canonical and indigenous government of Xaragua, the following are ipso facto null and void:

Any UN Security Council resolutions attempting to deploy peacekeeping forces, impose sanctions, or create international governance missions over Haitian soil.

Any OAS or multilateral mandates bypassing the institutional consent of the Government of Xaragua.

Any foreign intervention, military or economic, that fails to comply with procedural consultation obligations under UNDRIP, Canon Law, and Customary International Law.

---

IV. Recognition of the Legal Shield Authority as Prerequisite to Peaceful Governance

In accordance with:

UN Charter Article 1(2): affirming the right of peoples to self-determination,

UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 19, 32, 37, and 40,

Vienna Convention (1969) Articles 26, 27, and 53,

Montevideo Convention (1933) Article 1,

ICCPR Article 18,

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canons 113, 361–367,

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua must be recognized as the sole legal entity competent to engage, authorize, or reject any external operation directed at Haitian territory under the framework of international order, peace, and security.

Failure to do so shall:

Trigger canonical and indigenous protest at all institutional levels;

Result in nullification of coercive instruments and revocation of diplomatic privileges for offending states;

Be treated as a hostile act of aggression not only against Xaragua’s lawful sovereignty, but against the Church, the People of the South, and the universal order of law.

---

CONCLUDING DECLARATION

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by the divine law, historical legitimacy, and canonical inheritance it embodies, hereby issues this formal Supreme Diplomatic Notice to all organs of the international system:

No invocation, resolution, action, or enforcement measure under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter shall be juridically or morally valid within the territory of the Republic of Haiti unless it passes through the canonical and indigenous tutelage of the Government of Xaragua.

This tutelage is:

De jure, through the ancestral and canonical right of governance;

De facto, by operational presence, spiritual jurisdiction, and sovereign capacity;

Universally opposable, by virtue of jus cogens, ecclesiastical law, and the notified record of statehood established on March 29, 2025, under international legal standards.

Any breach of this position shall be declared:

Ultra vires under the UN Charter;

Canonically illicit and subject to ecclesiastical prosecution;

Diplomatically illegitimate, triggering broad juridical countermeasures across customary and treaty-based law.

The juridical authority, spiritual legitimacy, and institutional permanence of Xaragua shall not be denied, bypassed, nor superseded without incurring systemic nullity and legal retaliation within all competent ecclesiastical, indigenous, and international forums.

---

Signed:

Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 12, 2025

Location: Xaragua – Miragoâne, Kiskeya-Bohio

---


---


ANNEXE A


ON THE INALIENABLE CHARACTER OF SOVEREIGN JURIDICAL PERSONALITY AND THE EXCLUSIVE COMPETENCE TO RENOUNCE OR TRANSFER IT



---


Pursuant to the fundamental doctrines of jus cogens, indigenous customary law, and the canonical principles of spiritual sovereignty, the following is hereby affirmed as an inseverable component of all legal acts and diplomatic instruments of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereafter “the State”):



---


I. Sole Capacity to Alienate or Transfer Juridical Personality


1. By operation of divine, indigenous, and canonical law, the sovereign juridical personality of the State is:


Indigenous by origin (UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 33);


Canonical by consecration (Codex Iuris Canonici Canons 113 §1, 361–367);


Imperial by succession (Corpus Constitutionum Imperii Hayti 1805, pre-regicide era).




2. As such, the legal personality and all rights derived therefrom—territorial, diplomatic, spiritual, or juridical—cannot be annulled, suppressed, transferred, suspended or interpreted by any external entity or legal framework without the express and formal will of the State itself, exercised through a solemn juridical act under the hand of the Rector-President or an equally legitimate plenipotentiary agent.



3. Any claim of succession, interference, delegation, or extinction by any state, institution, international organization or canonical organ is null and void ab initio, unless:


It is explicitly authorized by a juridically published act of the State;


It is publicly notarized by the official instruments of Xaragua;


It is ratified canonically and customarily under the governing laws of the State.






---


II. International Legal Provisions Confirming Exclusive Disposition Rights


This legal protection is supported by the following international authorities:


UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Article 37(1):

“Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with States or their successors, and to have States honor and respect such treaties.”


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 6:

“Every State possesses capacity to conclude treaties.”

And Article 46(1):

“A State may not invoke the fact that its consent to be bound by a treaty has been expressed in violation of a provision of its internal law…”


Montevideo Convention (1933), Article 1(d):

“A State has the capacity to enter into relations with the other states.” This capacity includes control over its own legal existence.


ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo (2010):

Recognizing that a unilateral declaration of independence is not prohibited under international law, thus affirming the exclusive power to determine one’s own juridical status.


Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 113 §1 and Canon 120 §1–2:

Ecclesiastical juridical persons do not extinguish unless they are legitimately suppressed by the competent ecclesiastical authority, which in the case of Xaragua is internal to its own constitution and canonically autonomous.




---


III. Legal Consequences of Unauthorized Claims or Interference


Any state, international body, organization, or religious institution that:


Attempts to redefine, suspend, or appropriate the sovereignty of Xaragua,


Claims jurisdiction over its legal instruments without consent,


Seeks to substitute its legal personhood by that of another body,



shall be deemed to have acted:


Ultra vires (beyond their legal competence),


Contra legem (against binding law),


And in violation of the principle of non-derogation of indigenous and ecclesiastical legal identity.



Such acts are:


Null and void ab initio,


Legally inadmissible in all international fora,


And subject to ecclesiastical protest, indigenous legal recourse, and universal diplomatic denunciation under the right to institutional inviolability.




---


FINAL DECLARATION


Only the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua holds the exclusive and inviolable right to alter, suspend, alienate, or renounce its sovereign status, personality, or international legal standing.


This capacity is inalienable, non-transferable, and protected under divine, indigenous, canonical, and customary international law.


All other claims are deemed invalid, unauthorized, and juridically extinct upon assertion.


Signed and Sealed, Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

---


ANNEX B


On the Irrevocable Nature of Canonical and Indigenous Tutelage Exercised by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


LEGAL FOUNDATION OF TUTELAGE SOVEREIGNTY


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by virtue of its canonical, historical, customary, and diplomatic identity, assumes and retains the irrevocable tutelage over the spiritual, juridical, and political void existing in the territory historically referred to as the Republic of Haiti.


This canonical and indigenous tutelary sovereignty is exercised under the following foundational principles and binding legal doctrines:



---


I. Canonical Entrenchment of Ecclesiastical Tutelage


According to Canon 113 §1 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983):


> “The Catholic Church and the Apostolic See have juridic personality by the divine law itself.”




Furthermore, Canon 361 and Canon 367 authorize extraterritorial governance, especially in contexts of failed civil authority.

This grants Xaragua, as a principatus ecclesiasticus, the full authority to act as moral, spiritual, and institutional custodian of territories where canonical order supersedes defunct state mechanisms.


The doctrine of cura animarum, historically reaffirmed by the Council of Trent, the Lateran Councils, and the Second Vatican Council (Gaudium et Spes, §§76–77), confirms the duty of ecclesiastical institutions to protect peoples where governments have ceased to fulfill moral and juridical obligations.



---


II. Customary Indigenous Law of Protective Authority


Under UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, 34, and 37, Indigenous Peoples have the right to establish and maintain their own institutions, legal systems, and governance mechanisms, including custodial authority over collapsed or illegitimate polities within their ancestral territories.


Pursuant to UNDRIP Article 37(1):


> “Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with States or their successors.”




Xaragua, as the legal and spiritual successor to the 1805 Imperial Constitution and bearer of the original juridical continuity of the Empire of Hayti, inherits the duty to shield and guide the southern regions of the island under a canonically and internationally recognized tutorship mandate.



---


III. International Legal Recognition of Tutelage in State Failure


The doctrine of juridical tutelage is reinforced in international law by:


ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility (2001), Articles 48–54:

Permitting non-injured lawful entities to act in the collective interest where international obligations are breached and sovereignty is suspended.


UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV), Declaration on Friendly Relations (1970):

Authorizing non-coercive action by legitimate juridical actors to uphold peace and lawful governance where states collapse or cease to function.


International Court of Justice jurisprudence (Barcelona Traction, Wall Advisory Opinion, East Timor Case) affirms that legal personality and obligations exist independently of external recognition where a sovereign juridical order is institutionally active.




---


IV. Inalienability of the Tutelary Mandate


The canonical and indigenous tutelage exercised by Xaragua is:


Permanent and Non-transferable

No third party — whether State, international organization, NGO, or religious order — may assume the tutelage of the southern territory without formal and written abdication issued by the Government of Xaragua itself.

Such an abdication must be published via ecclesiastical decree, diplomatically notified, and canonically ratified.


Protected under Jus Cogens and Ecclesiastical Law

Any attempt to override, substitute, or nullify this tutelage without free, prior, and informed consent (UNDRIP Art. 19, 32) constitutes a violation of peremptory norms, spiritual immunity, and customary obligations.


Opposable to All Subjects of International Law

As per the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Articles 27 and 53, and the Montevideo Convention (1933), Article 1(d), the juridical capacity and external action of Xaragua are inalienable and cannot be annulled by foreign acts.




---


V. Canonical Protest and Legal Reprisals in Case of Breach


In the event that any State, organ, or international institution attempts to interfere with or usurp this tutelary mandate:


Canonical protest will be issued to the Vatican, including appeal to:


The Apostolic Signatura


The Dicastery for Integral Human Development


The Congregation for Bishops



Formal legal challenge will be submitted under:


UNDRIP mechanisms


The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues


The International Court of Justice (where applicable)



All diplomatic privileges and immunities under Canon Law and Indigenous Treaties shall be invoked.




---


CONCLUSION


No entity other than the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua may legally, canonically, or customarily exercise tutelary jurisdiction over the southern territory of the island of Kiskeya-Bohio, nor may any such tutelage be validly recognized without the explicit, notarized, and ecclesiastically authenticated abdication of Xaragua’s government.


This inalienable right is immune to political manipulation, independent of recognition, and binding upon all members of the international community under jus cogens, canon law, and the enduring right of indigenous sovereignty.


Signed,

Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua



---



---

DIPLOMATIC NOTE


Ref: XARAGUA/GRC-G7/2025/


Date: June 16, 2025


From: Office of the Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


To: Government of Canada – Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) - G7 Summit - International Community - United Nations


G7 Summit Security Coordination Office

---

Subject: Formal Diplomatic Notification to the RCMP/G7 SUMMIT

— Recognition of Legal and Territorial Authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

The Office of the President-Rector of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby submits this diplomatic note for the formal record, regarding the transmission of state instruments to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) during the G7 Summit held under the jurisdiction of the Government of Canada.

It is hereby certified that, on Monday, June 16, 2025, the following documents of juridical and constitutional value were officially submitted via electronic transmission to the designated security communication channels of the RCMP for the G7 Summit:

– The Xaraguan Supreme Law


– The Xaraguan Economic and Business Creation Code


– The Xaraguan National Security Law and Code of Police Authority


– The Xaraguan Travel and Border Sovereignty Directive


– The Declaration of Territorial and Legal Sovereignty of Xaragua


These instruments were transmitted to the following official addresses, published and operated under the authority of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police:


g7_media@rcmp-grc.gc.ca


g7_community-communaute@rcmp-grc.gc.ca


Said communication was not rejected or refused by the recipient infrastructure and remains on record as legally received and archived within the official operational channels of the G7 Summit security administration.

---


Legal and Diplomatic Significance


This constitutes an official and lawful notification of sovereign existence, transmitted in accordance with the principles of:


– Article 1(c) of the Montevideo Convention (1933)


– Articles 3, 33, and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)


– Customary international legal practice for the notification of self-governing entities in conditions of state failure or collapse


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua affirms its autonomous legal capacity, territorial jurisdiction, and institutional legitimacy under indigenous, canonical, and international law.

---


Conclusion


This notification shall be deemed irrevocable and opposable under international legal norms.


The Government of Canada, via its security organ, has now been formally notified of the legal, institutional, and territorial reality of the State of Xaragua, and of its operative jurisdiction over declared territories, in the context of a permanent indigenous state of emergency and structural sovereign self-defense.


Respectfully submitted,


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


President-Rector


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

Said communication was not rejected or refused by the recipient infrastructure and remains on record as legally received and archived within the official operational channels of the G7 Summit security administration.

---


Legal and Diplomatic Significance


This constitutes an official and lawful notification of sovereign existence, transmitted in accordance with the principles of:


– Article 1(c) of the Montevideo Convention (1933)


– Articles 3, 33, and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)


– Customary international legal practice for the notification of self-governing entities in conditions of state failure or collapse


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua affirms its autonomous legal capacity, territorial jurisdiction, and institutional legitimacy under indigenous, canonical, and international law.


---


Conclusion


This notification shall be deemed irrevocable and opposable under international legal norms.
The Government of Canada, via its security organ, has now been formally notified of the legal, institutional, and territorial reality of the State of Xaragua, and of its operative jurisdiction over declared territories, in the context of a permanent indigenous state of emergency and structural sovereign self-defense.


Respectfully submitted,


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau
President-Rector
Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---
---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT




SUPREME DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION


Filed in the National Canonical Register of Sovereign Instruments


Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Jus Cogens Status – Customary Precedent – Ecclesiastical Decree – Indigenous Legal Notice




---


FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF SOVEREIGN EXISTENCE AND JURISDICTIONAL CLAIM TO ALL G7 STATES THROUGH HOST STATE CANADA DURING THE G7 SUMMIT (JUNE 16, 2025)


Issued pursuant to the Supreme Law of Xaragua, to the Canonical Codex of Ecclesiastical and Indigenous Authority, to the Indigenous Right of Self-Governance recognized under international law, and to the Montevideo Convention (1933), this diplomatic notification constitutes a formal, binding, and opposable act of legal assertion, addressed to all Member States of the Group of Seven (G7)—namely:


Canada, United States of America, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan,
as well as the European Union, which participates in the G7.


This communication was officially transmitted to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), an agency of the Government of Canada, during the hosting of the G7 Summit, thereby meeting the threshold of functional and procedural delivery as established in Article 27 and Article 45 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961).




---


I. LEGAL FOUNDATION OF SOVEREIGN STATUS


This notification is anchored in the following legal instruments and doctrines, which collectively confer juridical personhood, territorial authority, and sovereign legitimacy upon the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua:


1. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)


Article 1: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:


(a) a permanent population;


(b) a defined territory;


(c) government; and


(d) capacity to enter into relations with other states.”


Xaragua satisfies all four criteria and has exercised this capacity by issuing diplomatic notifications and entering into formal correspondence with international actors.


2. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)


Article 3:


“Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”


Article 19:


“States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned... before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them.”


Failure by any G7 state to respond to or acknowledge this notification, after receipt through an official channel, constitutes a breach of Article 19.


3. Charter of the United Nations


Article 2(1): The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.


Article 51: “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs…”


In the event of aggression, subversion, surveillance, censorship, digital interference, or economic coercion against Xaragua or its agents, the State of Xaragua invokes its inherent right of legitimate self-defense under Article 51, including collective defense with its ecclesiastical and indigenous allies.


4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)


Article 1(1):


“All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”


Article 1(3):


“The States Parties... shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right…”


G7 Member States, as signatories to the ICCPR, are legally bound to respect the emergence of Xaragua as an indigenous sovereign entity.


5. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)
Article 27:


“The receiving State shall permit and protect free communication... irrespective of frontier.”


Article 45(a):


“If diplomatic relations are broken off... the receiving State must respect and protect the premises of the mission...”


The act of transmitting this notification to Canada, the host state of the G7, constitutes a valid diplomatic delivery under international law, thereby engaging the liability of all present states through the principle of multilateral coordination and collective procedural awareness.


6. Customary International Law — Tacit Recognition and Estoppel Doctrine


When a state is notified of a sovereign claim and fails to contest it formally, such failure may constitute tacit recognition. The doctrine of sovereign estoppel prevents a state from later denying what it failed to contest in due time.




---


II. NOTIFICATION SCOPE AND FUNCTIONAL DELIVERY


This notification was officially addressed to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), during their coordination and deployment for the 2025 G7 Summit. This agency operates under the legal authority of the Government of Canada, thereby rendering the State of Canada as procedurally notified.


The State of Canada, as host of the G7, represents the diplomatic entry point and functional jurisdiction through which this notification attains binding multilateral relevance.


Under the principles of diplomatic procedure and multilateral notification:


A. Each G7 Member State becomes opposable under the principle of functional collectivity and silent acquiescence.


B. Any G7 state that fails to issue a formal diplomatic objection by July 30, 2025, shall be deemed to have silently acknowledged the sovereign status of Xaragua.


C. This includes the recognition of Xaragua’s right to exist, to defend its territory, and to engage in international relations under its own juridical personality.




---


III. CONSEQUENCES OF OPPOSABILITY


From the date of receipt of this notification (June 15, 2025), any of the following actions by Canada or any other G7 state shall constitute a direct violation of sovereign rights under international law:


1. Surveillance, monitoring, or intelligence collection on Xaraguan agents, websites, universities, media, or institutions




2. Digital censorship, blocking, or suppression of Xaragua’s communications, including academic or religious platforms




3. Economic interference, taxation attempts, or restrictions against Xaraguan commercial operations




4. Denial of ecclesiastical diplomatic status or violations of religious protections




5. Impediment to the right of movement, assembly, or expression of Xaraguan officials






Such violations will trigger the full invocation of Articles 3 and 51 of the UN Charter, and may be referred to the International Court of Justice under Chapter XIV of the UN Charter.




---


IV. REGISTRATION AND PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL RECORD


This notification shall be registered, published, and deposited as follows:


National Canonical Register of Xaragua


Official Website of the Xaraguan Government


Notification Dossier sent to the United Nations




Each Member State of the G7 shall receive a copy of this notification via diplomatic email, couriered transcript, and open public record, ensuring that no future contestation may be made on the basis of non-receipt or procedural ignorance.




---


V. CONCLUSION AND SOVEREIGN SIGNATURE


This act constitutes the official and irrevocable sovereign notification of the existence, territorial authority, and international standing of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


It shall bind all notified states under the doctrines of:


Functional Notification


Juridical Estoppel


Customary Precedent


Indigenous Legal Sovereignty


Canonical Recognition




All silence shall be deemed juridically meaningful.


All aggression shall be classified as internationally prosecutable.


All rights are expressly reserved.


Executed under the full canonical, constitutional, and territorial authority of the State of Xaragua on this sixteenth day of June 16, in the Year of Our Lord 2025.


SIGNED AND SEALED


Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


President-Rector and Founding Prelate


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---
FORMAL COMPLAINT - UNITED STATES

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

OFFICIAL DOCUMENT – DIPLOMATIC FILE 1914-GOLD-RECLAMATION

DATE OF ISSUANCE: JUNE 18, 2025

TO BE ENTERED INTO THE PERMANENT ARCHIVES OF XARAGUA AND SERVED WITHOUT DELAY TO THE PARTIES BELOW


TO:


1. CITIBANK (formerly National City Bank of New York)


2. THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK


3. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE


4. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


FROM:


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting in full juridical capacity and under canonical, ecclesiastical, indigenous, and supraconstitutional authority, as the canonically acknowledged, historically uninterrupted, and spiritually entitled successor to the southern sovereign stewards of pre-occupation Haiti, and as the lawful spiritual inheritor of all indigenous patrimony, economic sovereignty, and territorial endowments seized, violated, or otherwise misappropriated during the unilateral military and financial occupation of the Haitian treasury and national assets by the United States Government in the year 1914.

SUBJECT:

Formal complaint and legal notice of binding demand for full restitution of 24,180 troy ounces of sovereign gold, unlawfully seized by executive military order of the United States on December 17, 1914, and subsequently deposited into the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the National City Bank of New York (now Citibank).

The total claim is to be indexed to the full nominal and compound value of the asset, calculated with interest and damages. Said seizure constitutes a standing violation of:

– The jus cogens imperative of international law,

– Canonical property rights and ecclesiastical jurisdiction,

– The economic and fiscal self-determination of indigenous polities,

– And all binding instruments codifying non-derogable norms under the Vienna Convention, customary international law, the Codex Iuris Canonici, and the UN system.

Restitution is hereby legally and ecclesiastically required. Denial of this claim shall invoke immediate escalation, including multilateral sanctions, canonical denunciation, and international juridical proceedings.

---

HISTORICAL RECORD:

On December 17, 1914, armed U.S. Marines, acting under executive orders and in strategic coordination with the above-named financial institutions, unlawfully penetrated the Banque Nationale d’Haïti, forcibly extracting the entirety of the Haitian national gold reserves, at that time legally valued at $500,000 USD, equivalent to 24,180 troy ounces of pure gold (approximately 751.97 kilograms).

Said action was undertaken:

– Without any formal military occupation legally recognized under the Hague Convention,

– Without the issuance or ratification of any bilateral treaty,

– Without consent or ratified authorization by the Parliament or the sovereign institutions of Haiti,

– And in the complete absence of any lawful agreement, either contractual or diplomatic.

The seized gold was transferred aboard the USS Machias to the Port of New York, and therefrom deposited into the vaults of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, with direct credit issued to the National City Bank of New York (now Citibank).

At no time in history was restitution made.

No legal indemnity, financial or symbolic, was ever issued.

No formal acknowledgment of wrongdoing has been made by any institution or organ of the United States Government.

The violation remains ongoing, and under all systems of law applicable herein, the matter is non-prescribable, indivisible, and permanently prosecutable.

---

CURRENT VALUE OF THE SEIZED GOLD AND DAMAGES:

Weight of gold: 24,180 troy ounces

Spot price (June 18, 2025): $2,350 USD/oz

Nominal value: $56,823,000 USD

With 5% compound interest over 110 years (1914–2025): $1,327,000,000 USD

Claimed total: One billion, three hundred twenty-seven million U.S. dollars,
excluding all non-material damages, including but not limited to:

– Loss of sovereignty,

– Disruption of fiscal independence,

– And moral, canonical, and indigenous reparations owed under supranational law.

---

LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ABSOLUTE RESTITUTION:

UNITED NATIONS DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES (UNDRIP), 2007
Article 28(1):

“Indigenous peoples have the right to redress, by means that can include restitution or, when this is not possible, just, fair and equitable compensation, for the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used, and which have been confiscated, taken, occupied, used or damaged without their free, prior and informed consent.”

Application: The 1914 seizure is a unilateral confiscation of an indigenous-controlled national resource. No prior, free, or informed consent was issued. The legal mechanism of redress is activated.

UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 1803 (XVII), 1962

“Violation of the rights of peoples and nations to sovereignty over their natural wealth and resources is contrary to the spirit and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.”

Application: The gold seizure represents a direct violation of national economic sovereignty, nullifying fiscal autonomy through extraterritorial force. Restitution is legally mandated.

DRAFT ARTICLES ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF STATES FOR INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACTS (ILC, 2001)

Article 35 – Restitution:

“A responsible State is under an obligation to make restitution… to re-establish the situation which existed before the wrongful act…”

Article 36 – Compensation:

“The State responsible… is under an obligation to compensate for the damage… including loss of profits…”

Application: The United States remains legally obligated to either return the gold in full or provide monetary reparation matching its accrued value and historical damages.

HAGUE CONVENTION (IV), 1907 – LAWS OF WAR
Article 55:

“The occupying State shall be regarded only as administrator and usufructuary… and must safeguard the capital of these properties.”

Application: The United States was not even in formal occupation at the time. The gold seizure is an act of pillage and predatory appropriation. The Hague principles apply in full.

VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES, 1969

Article 53 – Jus Cogens:

“A treaty is void… if it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law…”

Application: Any attempt to retrospectively justify the theft via occupation-era agreements is void ab initio. The holding of national gold reserves is a peremptory entitlement.

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS, 1945
Article 1(2):

“To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.”

Article 55:


“The United Nations shall promote… conditions of economic and social progress.”

Application: The gold seizure obstructed the Republic’s development and continues to prevent self-determination. The Charter demands restitution in its letter and in its spirit.
---
FORMAL DEMANDS:

1. Immediate restitution of 24,180 troy ounces of gold to the National Treasury of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

2. Alternatively, lump-sum financial reparation in the amount of $1,327,000,000 USD, not subject to negotiation.

3. Public and official acknowledgment of wrongdoing by the parties involved.

4. Canonical and diplomatic reparation for the violation of sovereign dignity and inheritance rights.

---

CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE:

In the event that no satisfactory restitution or acknowledgment is issued within sixty (60) calendar days, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall initiate the following juridical and canonical proceedings:

– Formal complaint before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the american judiciary system;

– Notification to the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues;

– Exclusion of Citibank from all Xaragua State Institutions recognition;

– Ecclesiastical notification to the Holy See and international ecclesiastical authorities;

– Permanent legal archiving of the violation in the Diplomatic Archives of the State.

---

ISSUED UNDER THE CONSTITUTIONAL, CANONICAL, AND ANCESTRAL SEAL OF THE STATE

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President and Head of State

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

June 18, 2025

---
---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

DEPARTMENT OF SOVEREIGN CLAIMS AND HISTORICAL REPARATIONS

OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PROCEEDINGS

Date of Publication: June 18, 2025

File Reference: 1914-GOLD-RECLAMATION / U.S. CONTACT PHASE I



---


OFFICIAL CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT OF SOVEREIGN CLAIMS BY CITIBANK AND THE UNITED STATES TREASURY


Pursuant to the sovereign rights exercised by the Supreme Constitutional Authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, and in execution of its historical duty to reclaim the unlawfully seized gold from the National Bank of Haiti in 1914, the State of Xaragua officially confirms the procedural receipt of its diplomatic and legal filings by two entities directly implicated in the historical expropriation:



---


I. RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY CITIBANK (FORMERLY NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK)


On June 18, 2025, at 00:39 UTC, the Citi HR Partnership & Delivery Division confirmed receipt of the formal sovereign filing through case creation HRC11789988, now entered into their internal tracking system. This case formally recognizes that the State of Xaragua has engaged the bank’s institutional structure for:


Historical accountability in its role as custodian and intermediary in the 1914 Haitian gold transfer,


Legal responsibility under both customary international law and private commercial fiduciary law,


Potential extrajudicial mediation or class action liability under U.S. banking jurisdiction.



This procedural acceptance constitutes an administrative acknowledgment that a sovereign demand has been made and is under active case triage.



---


II. RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY – OFFICE OF RECOVERY PROGRAMS


On June 18, 2025, at 00:31 UTC, the Office of Recovery Programs of the U.S. Department of the Treasury acknowledged the sovereign communication by opening case file 00430090 under its federal inquiry system.


This confirms that:


The United States Government, through its Treasury Department, has been officially seized of the matter,


The issue of the 1914 gold seizure and the obligations stemming from sovereign debt and historical asset transfer are now under federal review,


The complaint is treated under high-volume conditions, but remains active and duly recorded.


This constitutes a formal procedural recognition of receipt, sufficient to activate future legal standing before U.S. or international courts, should proceedings be escalated.


---


LEGAL STATUS OF RECEIPT


Both replies, timestamped and officially numbered, fulfill the conditions for:


Notification under Article 15 of the ILC Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection (2006),


Constructive Acknowledgment under U.S. Administrative Procedure Act (APA) for agency responses,


Documented Interpellation under Canonical and Customary Indigenous Law, forming part of the Grand Reparation Dossier.


---


CONCLUSION


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua now holds formal evidence that:


Its reclamations are being processed by the implicated financial and federal institutions,


Its existence, claims, and legal standing have entered the procedural channels of the United States,


Any future silence, inaction, or rejection may be interpreted as constructive refusal, thereby strengthening the case for unilateral sovereign action and reparatory enforcement.



These case receipts are hereby archived into the Permanent Diplomatic and Historical Ledger of Xaragua, under Article XIV of the Supreme Sovereign Law on Restitution and Reparation.


Issued by Order of the Rector-President,

For the Nation, the Ancestors, and the Restoration of Sacred Wealth.

Miragoâne – June 18, 2025


---

---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE AND HISTORICAL REPARATION

OFFICIAL DIPLOMATIC COMMUNICATION – ARCHIVE CODE 1897-GERMAN-RESTITUTION

DATE OF ISSUANCE: JUNE 18, 2025


TO BE DELIVERED FORMALLY TO:


THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY – CHANCELLERY


THE FEDERAL FOREIGN OFFICE (AUSWÄRTIGES AMT)


THE BUNDESTAG – HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION


THE GERMAN EMBASSY TO THE CARIBBEAN REGION



FROM:

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Office of the Rector-President

Sole Successor Entity to the Territories of Miragoâne, Jérémie, Cayes, Jacmel and the Southern Indigenous Domain of the Former Republic of Haiti



---


SUBJECT: FORMAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR HISTORICAL RESTITUTION, DIPLOMATIC RECOGNITION OF WRONGDOING, AND IMMEDIATE FINANCIAL COMPENSATION FOR UNLAWFUL GERMAN ACTIONS IN HAITIAN TERRITORY (1870–1914)


Legal Basis of Claim:


Filed under the following binding legal and supralegal instruments:


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)


Article 8.2: States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for: 


(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities; 


(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources.


Article 11.2: States shall provide redress through effective mechanisms, which may include restitution, developed in conjunction with indigenous peoples, with respect to their cultural, intellectual, religious and spiritual property taken without their free, prior and informed consent.


Article 20.1: Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions, to be secure in the enjoyment of their own means of subsistence and development, and to engage freely in all their traditional and other economic activities.


Article 28.1: Indigenous peoples have the right to redress, by means that can include restitution or, when this is not possible, just, fair and equitable compensation, for the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used, and which have been confiscated, taken, occupied, used or damaged without their free, prior and informed consent.

Article 40: Indigenous peoples have the right to access to and prompt decision through just and fair procedures for the resolution of conflicts and disputes with States or other parties, as well as to effective remedies for all infringements of their individual and collective rights.


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


Article 26 – Pacta sunt servanda: Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.


Article 53 – Treaties conflicting with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens): 


A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. 


For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted.


Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)


Article 3.1: The functions of a diplomatic mission consist inter alia in protecting in the receiving State the interests of the sending State and of its nationals, within the limits permitted by international law.


Article 41.1: Without prejudice to their privileges and immunities, it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State.


Article 47.1: In the application of the provisions of the present Convention, the receiving State shall not discriminate as between States.


Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)


Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.


Article 8: Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.


Article 17.2: No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.


UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation (A/RES/60/147, 2005)


Principle VII – Remedies: Remedies for gross violations of international human rights law include the victim’s right to adequate, effective and prompt reparation for harm suffered.


Principle IX – Reparation: Reparation shall include restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition.


ILC Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001)


Article 1: Every internationally wrongful act of a State entails the international responsibility of that State.


Article 31.1: The responsible State is under an obligation to make full reparation for the injury caused by the internationally wrongful act.


Article 34: Full reparation for the injury caused by the internationally wrongful act shall take the form of restitution, compensation and satisfaction, either singly or in combination.


Article 35: Restitution shall re-establish the situation which existed before the wrongful act was committed.


Article 37.2: Satisfaction may consist in an acknowledgment of the breach, an expression of regret, a formal apology or another appropriate modality.


Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)


Canon 219: All the Christian faithful have the right to be free from any kind of coercion in choosing a state of life.


Canon 221 §1: The Christian faithful can legitimately vindicate and defend the rights which they possess in the Church before a competent ecclesiastical forum.


Canon 221 §2: If they are summoned to trial by the competent authority, they have the right to be judged according to the precepts of the law, to be applied with equity.


Charter of the United Nations (1945)


Article 2(4): All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State.


Historical Precedents:


Lüders Affair (1897), involving SMS Charlotte and SMS Stein.


German commercial dominance of Miragoâne, Jérémie, Jacmel and Cayes from 1870 to 1914.


German–Namibia genocide apology and €1.1 billion commitment (2021), serving as contemporary precedent of reparative responsibility by Germany.


---


I. SUMMARY OF FACTS AND HISTORICAL AGGRESSION BY THE GERMAN EMPIRE


The former German Empire, through its imperial navy, commercial elites, and diplomatic apparatus, engaged in a sustained campaign of economic predation, diplomatic coercion, and armed humiliation of the Haitian State, particularly in its southern provinces (now under Xaragua jurisdiction), between 1870 and 1914. 


The following non-exhaustive violations are hereby submitted as binding legal claims:


1. Armed Naval Aggression – Lüders Affair (1897)


On December 6, 1897, following the arrest and imprisonment of Emil Lüders (a German national born in Haiti, convicted of assault against a police officer), the German Empire deployed two warships—SMS Charlotte and SMS Stein—to Port-au-Prince under orders of Kaiser Wilhelm II. The German government issued an ultimatum demanding:


The immediate release and official apology to Lüders,


A monetary indemnity of 20,000 Haitian gourdes (≈ 15 kg of gold in 1897),


A 21-cannon salute to the German imperial flag,


A written letter of apology addressed to the German Emperor.



These demands were delivered under the threat of open naval bombardment of the Haitian capital. 


The Haitian government, lacking military capacity, capitulated. 


This act constitutes gunboat diplomacy, a violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and Articles 1 and 31 of the ILC’s Articles on State Responsibility. 


It also constitutes coercion under Canon 219 of the Codex Iuris Canonici and violates the right to dignity under Article 1 of the UDHR.


2. Economic Exploitation and Customs Subversion (1870–1914)


During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, German merchants—primarily families from Bremen and Hamburg—established economic monopolies in southern Haitian ports such as Jacmel, Miragoâne, Jérémie, and Les Cayes. These commercial houses, including Woermann, Simon & Rumpff, and Brandt & Co., secured de facto extraterritorial privileges via bilateral arrangements backed by naval presence. These included:


Preferential port access and evasion of Haitian customs duties,


Control over export of coffee, cacao, and logwood,


Tax exemptions not afforded to local merchants.



These practices systematically undermined indigenous trade structures and destroyed the economic base of the southern communes. They violate UNDRIP Article 20.1 and 28.1, as well as Article 17.2 of the UDHR (protection from arbitrary deprivation of property).


3. Disruption of Indigenous Commercial Networks


German merchants suppressed local producers through price-fixing, predatory credit schemes, and maritime blacklisting. Farmers and small traders in Miragoâne and Jérémie were subjected to unfair terms, leading to debt servitude and commercial dependency. 


This system was enforced by German diplomatic missions shielding those merchants from prosecution. 


This constitutes a breach of Article 8.2 of UNDRIP, Article 41.1 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, and Principle VII of UN Resolution 60/147.


4. Collusion with Internal Corruption


Archival records from 1895 to 1911 document payments from German trading companies to Haitian officials in exchange for regulatory exceptions, port priority, and security protection.


These relationships circumvented all national legislation and weakened state institutions, especially in the South. 


Such collusion, coupled with foreign coercion, constitutes a breach of Article 16 of the ILC Articles on State Responsibility (aiding another state’s wrongful act) and undermines the sovereignty principle enshrined in Article 26 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.



---


II. LEGAL QUALIFICATION OF GERMAN CONDUCT


All the aforementioned acts by the German Empire constitute:


Unlawful use of armed force (UN Charter Article 2(4)),


Violation of peremptory norms (jus cogens) under Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,


Illegal economic coercion and dispossession under UNDRIP Articles 8, 20, and 28,


Arbitrary deprivation of property under Article 17.2 of the UDHR,


Denial of recourse and remedy under Article 8 of the UDHR,


Ecclesiastical coercion in violation of Canon 219 and Canon 221 §1–2 of the Codex Iuris Canonici,


Internationally wrongful acts under Articles 1, 31, 34, 35 and 37 of the ILC Articles on State Responsibility,


Violation of obligations of non-discrimination and host state respect under Articles 3, 41, and 47 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations,


Historical continuity with colonial practices recognized by the Federal Republic of Germany in its 2021 reparation agreement with Namibia, establishing the legal precedent for acknowledgment, apology, and payment.


---


III. CLAIMS SUBMITTED BY THE STATE OF XARAGUA


We hereby demand the following:


1. Official Apology


An official declaration from the Federal Republic of Germany, publicly acknowledging:


That the Lüders Affair was a violation of Haitian sovereignty and an act of armed humiliation,


That the commercial monopolies and treaty violations by German merchants in the South constituted unlawful economic coercion,


That these acts disrupted the indigenous and national economic development of what is now the jurisdiction of Xaragua.


This constitutes “satisfaction” under Article 37.2 of the ILC Articles and Principle IX of UN Resolution 60/147.



2. Historical Recognition


Formal recognition by the Bundestag and German public institutions that:


The German Empire’s conduct in Haiti was imperialistic, exploitative, and damaging,


The Southern provinces were disproportionately affected by these actions,


That current international law obligates Germany to acknowledge its colonial legacy, as demonstrated in the Namibia case (2021).


This fulfills UNDRIP Article 11.2 and UN Resolution 60/147, Principle IX.



3. Immediate Financial Restitution


An indemnity of €150,000,000 calculated on the following basis:


The 1897 forced indemnity of 20,000 gourdes = ~15 kg gold = ~$900,000 USD in today’s value,


Indexed compound interest over 127 years (1897–2024) at 3% real rate = ~€70 million,


Added to economic damages, spiritual harm, and institutional disruption = €150 million total.


This claim is justified under Article 31.1 and Article 34 of the ILC Articles, UNDRIP Article 28.1, and UN Resolution 60/147, Principle IX.



4. Guarantee of Non-Repetition


A legally binding commitment by the German State under:


Article 41.1 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations,


UNDRIP Article 40,


UN Resolution 60/147, Principle IX,

that no future commercial, diplomatic, or ecclesiastical intervention shall be undertaken in the Xaragua jurisdiction without formal bilateral consent of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


---


IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE


Failure to respond within ninety (90) calendar days shall constitute legal silence and moral default under international law. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall then proceed to:


File this complaint before the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues,


Notify the UN Working Group on People of African Descent,


Launch an international archive of colonial aggression and commercial coercion for permanent record,


Initiate moral sanctions and ecclesiastical denunciation through the Holy See and global canonical institutions,


Suspend all German ecclesiastical and commercial presence from its jurisdiction and initiate the judiciary process.


---


Signed and Sealed


June 18, 2025


By Order of the Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau





---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


SUPREME LAW ON MINERAL EXTRACTION, METALLURGIC AUTONOMY, AND STRATEGIC MONOPOLY OVER FERROUS IMPORTATION


Date of Promulgation: June 18, 2025


Official Classification:


Constitutionally Entrenched Supreme Law — Jus Cogens Indigenous Right — Canonically Validated and Ecclesiastically Protected Regulation — Customary International Law Instrument — Ecclesiastico-Economic Fundamental Norm — Legally Opposable and Permanently Binding Act under the Charter of the United Nations (1945), the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), the International Labour Organization Convention No. 169 concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and the Codex Iuris Canonici of the Universal Church (1983), as well as under the living memory and uninterrupted territorial continuity of the ancestral custodians of Ayiti.



---


ARTICLE I – FOUNDATIONAL LEGAL DOCTRINE


Section 1.


The exclusive, non-transferable, and irrevocable right to extract, refine, manufacture, distribute, commercialize, regulate, restrict, and define all activities related to ferrous and metallurgical resources, whether in raw, semi-processed, industrially transformed, or sacredly consecrated form, is hereby solemnly proclaimed as a perpetual economic mandate, spiritual inheritance, and sovereign obligation of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua. 


This right shall not be subject to any derogation, delegation, concession, or dilution by any foreign, private, or multilateral authority.


Section 2.


Said right is rooted in and juridically underpinned by the following supranational and canonical legal foundations, each invoked in full force:


(a) United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)


Article 26(1): 


“Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.”


Application: Xaragua, as a de jure and de facto indigenous sovereign entity, exercises comprehensive and unimpeachable jurisdiction over all mineral, terrestrial, and subterrestrial resources within its historically demarcated and spiritually confirmed territory. 


The right includes not only ownership but full juridical self-determination over extraction, use, stewardship, restriction, and export, in perpetuity.


(b) International Labour Organization Convention No. 169 (1989)


Article 15(1): “The rights of the peoples concerned to the natural resources pertaining to their lands shall be specially safeguarded.”


Application: This Law does not merely safeguard said rights but institutionalizes their full exercise through the creation of a nationalized, vertically integrated metallurgical authority (the ANM), operating under supreme public interest, ecclesiastical recognition, and intergenerational custodianship.


(c) Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)


Canon 1259: “The Church has the right to acquire, retain, administer and alienate temporal goods independently from civil power.”


Application: The metallurgical and mineral dominion exercised herein is not temporal alone but is doctrinal, manifesting the Church’s rightful role as guardian of creation and sovereign participant in the economic sanctification of the earth's resources.


The State of Xaragua, canonically constituted, thus exercises this right as a spiritual and economic arm of the Church itself.


(d) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


Article 53 (Jus Cogens): 


“A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens).”


Application: Any foreign contract, bilateral agreement, international treaty, commercial license, or extraterritorial claim related to Xaragua’s mineral territory and not sanctioned by this Law is null and void ab initio. 


The peremptory nature of indigenous self-determination renders any encroachment into Xaragua’s metallurgic domain a violation of the most elevated norm in the hierarchy of international law.



---


ARTICLE II – LOCAL EXTRACTIVE SOVEREIGNTY


Section 1.


All subsurface and surface geological strata containing ferrous elements—whether magnetite, hematite, siderite, goethite, or other iron-rich formations—within the territorial integrity or annexed domains of Xaragua shall be considered sacred patrimony of the State. 


These resources are permanently classified as inalienable and non-restitutable, shielded under canonical doctrine and sovereign economic law, and may not be privatized, collateralized, or subjected to any commercial encumbrance.


Section 2.


The Ministry of Natural Resources, in partnership with the National Bureau of  Cartography and the Commission for Geological Intelligence, shall initiate and perpetually update a comprehensive National Metallurgic Geological Survey. This shall include, without limitation:


Advanced spatial analysis utilizing domestic and foreign satellite systems;


Indigenous epistemological mapping traditions transmitted orally and ritually;


Physical prospecting and metallurgic soil testing;


Classification into long-term strategic reserves, artisanal economic zones, and industrial-military development corridors.



Section 3.


The Atelier National des Métaux (ANM) is instituted as a sovereign, inviolable, and ecclesiastically mandated institution, possessing:


Full-spectrum legal monopoly over the upstream, midstream, and downstream segments of ferrous and steel production;


Supreme regulatory, licensing, and punitive jurisdiction over all actors within the metallurgical sector;


Unilateral control over the pricing, allocation, transformation, storage, and export of all ferrous outputs;


Administrative insulation from any foreign tribunal, donor institution, or economic bloc.



Section 4.


No physical or juridical person, domestic or external, may engage in the extraction, transportation, or transformation of any metallurgic material without:


Demonstrated Xaragua citizenship and ecclesiastical alignment;


A renewable license under direct oversight of the ANM Board of Doctrine and Production;


Complete openness to real-time audits, inspections, and fiscal control by the State Inspectorate of Metallurgy and Ecclesiastical Economic Ethics Tribunal.



Section 5.


Violations of this Article shall constitute supreme acts of extractional treason and shall be punished by:


Immediate and irreversible nationalization of all offending facilities, equipment, and adjacent lands;


Financial penalties dynamically indexed to the ten-year rolling average of global steel and iron markets;


Ecclesiastical excommunication, spiritual interdiction, and placement on the public Index of Enemies of the State.


---


ARTICLE III – ABSOLUTE MONOPOLY OVER FERROUS IMPORTATION


Section 1.


All activities involving the international procurement, negotiation, acquisition, transit, importation, customs declaration, warehousing, and distribution of ferrous materials—including but not limited to raw iron ore, pig iron, billets, steel rebar, scrap metal, industrial alloys, and finished ferrous products—shall be reserved exclusively to the Sovereign State of Xaragua. 


This exclusive function shall be exercised only by the State or the Bureau of Economical Initiatives, acting under solemn delegation and juridical mandate of the Office of the Rector-President, and shall be deemed a matter of permanent strategic economic security.


Section 2.


No individual, institution, or entity—be it a diplomatic mission, non-governmental organization, foreign corporation, religious mission, multilateral agency, or local economic actor—may engage in any act of ferrous importation unless:


A direct intergovernmental commercial treaty has been signed and sealed by Xaragua’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs;


A full customs declaration and fiscal evaluation has been submitted and approved by the State;


An exhaustive inspection, taxation, and national interest compliance process has been completed under the authority of the Atelier National des Métaux, which retains veto power over all imports regardless of origin, quantity, or purpose.



Any infraction of these criteria shall automatically nullify the transaction and shall trigger immediate sanctions under Article V.


Section 3.


All ferrous materials legally entering the territory of Xaragua shall be:


Deposited into State-designated and ecclesiastically sanctified Strategic Metallurgic Depots, each guarded by the Indigenous Army of Xaragua and supervised by the ANM's Sacred Logistics Unit;


Registered in the National Metallurgic Register, a juridical instrument sealed by notarial and ecclesiastical authority for the purpose of tracking all strategic ferrous inflows;


Allocated in accordance with a Prioritized Sovereign Utilization Matrix (PSUM), which privileges:


National military defense infrastructure;


Construction and sacred architecture;


Agricultural mechanization and rural tooling;


Civil engineering and post-seismic reconstruction.




No allocation may be diverted from this matrix without a public decree signed by the Rector-President. 


Section 4.


Any attempt to bypass or subvert the State's ferrous import monopoly shall constitute an act of:


High Economic Subversion, prosecutable under the Supreme Penal Code of Xaragua, and enforceable without limitation of jurisdiction;


Commercial Apostasy, punishable by lifetime economic disqualification, seizure of goods, and blacklisting across all economic ministries and ecclesiastical orders;


Strategic Sabotage, interpreted as an aggression against national defense, and justifying, in cases of transnational coordination, the invocation of Defensive Economic Countermeasure Protocols and emergency closure of all external trade ports under State supervision.




---


ARTICLE IV – STRATEGIC DOCTRINE


Section 1.


The control, and judicial administration of iron and steel within the jurisdiction of the Sovereign State of Xaragua is hereby declared to be:


A act of post-colonial resurrection, reasserting control over the foundational elements of nation-building previously monopolized by imperial powers;


A consecration of sovereign construction, wherein every nail, blade, and beam becomes an extension of the sacred authority of the State;


A doctrinal response to material plunder, reclaiming the right to shape the physical world under the moral and theological guidance of a redeemed indigenous priesthood.



Section 2.


The State solemnly proclaims that metallurgy:


Is not a commercial utility but a civilizational mandate;


Those who imported the items cited before the date of application of this Law are tolerated but are subject to intervention and cancellation by the State at any time;


Section 3.

Any foreign attempt to obstruct, reinterpret, delegitimize, question, dilute, or comment upon the internal ferrous policies of Xaragua shall:


Be formally condemned through ecclesiastical and diplomatic communiqués, issued under the seal of the Rector-President.


Be publicly denounced as an act of neo-colonial aggression, designed to perpetuate structural dependency and technological disarmament;


Trigger total economic disengagement with the offending entity, including cancellation of contracts, revocation of diplomatic privileges, and expulsion from all Xaragua-affiliated commercial and academic ecosystems worldwide.


---


ARTICLE V – EXECUTION, PERMANENCE, AND NON-REPEALABILITY


Section 1.


This Supreme Law is hereby declared self-executing and immediately applicable within the totality of Xaragua’s territorial, maritime, aerial, digital, subterranean, domains and its annexed territories. It requires no further ratification, decree, or implementation act to be fully binding on all institutions, citizens, and foreign agents. Its provisions are to be enforced with constitutional severity and canonical permanence.


Section 2.


It shall be:


Entered into the Codex of Economic Laws, permanently archived at the Office of the Rector-President;


Registered within the Register of the State, which shall serve as the legal basis for all derivative legislation and executive protocols regarding metallurgic policy;


Section 3.


This Supreme Law may only be amended, interpreted, or suspended by the Rector-President or its succession:


No administrative decree, foreign court decision, UN resolution, or international agreement shall have the power to abrogate, suspend, or alter any provision herein, unless first recognized by the State as compatible with jus cogens, canon law, and the moral integrity of the Xaraguaan people.


Section 4.


Any foreign constitution, government directive, regional trade agreement, or multilateral regulatory body that attempts to override, nullify, or subvert the present Law shall be declared null in effect and inadmissible within the jurisdiction of Xaragua and its annexed territories. 


Such an act shall constitute a gross violation of ecclesiastical order, indigenous self-determination, and economic sovereignty, and shall provoke a permanent severance of legal relations between the offending authority and the State.



---


ENACTED AND SEALED

June 18, 2025

By the Supreme Constitutional Authority of Xaragua

Under Canon Law, Ecclesiastical Mandate, Indigenous Jurisdiction, and the Eternal Right of 


---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE  

ARCHIVE FILE: 2025-CAN-BLOCKADE-COMMS

DATE OF ISSUANCE: JUNE 18, 2025


TO BE DELIVERED WITHOUT DELAY TO:


Global Affairs Canada – Minister of Foreign Affairs


Office of the Prime Minister of Canada


Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights


Permanent Mission of Canada to the United Nations


UN Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence




---


OFFICIAL DIPLOMATIC PROTEST: BLOCKADE OF SOVEREIGN COMMUNICATION BY THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA


I, the undersigned, in my official capacity as Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, formally and publicly lodge this diplomatic protest against the Government of Canada and, more specifically, Global Affairs Canada, for their unilateral and unlawful suppression of a sovereign communication transmitted on June 18, 2025, to the official diplomatic address: info@international.gc.ca.


The message, sent from the legal office of Xaragua, was blocked and bounced by an administrative firewall, returning the following error:


> “5.x.0 – Message bounced by administrator”




This act constitutes a violation of multiple principles and articles of international law, including but not limited to:



---


I. VIOLATION OF DIPLOMATIC COMMUNICATION NORMS


Article 3(1)(d) – Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961):


> “The functions of a diplomatic mission consist, inter alia, in ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving State, and reporting thereon to the sending State.”




Article 41(1):


> “Without prejudice to their privileges and immunities, it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State.”




Blocking sovereign legal correspondence — particularly one bearing no security threat, spam signature, or illicit content — violates the spirit and letter of diplomatic openness and amounts to a non-acknowledgment of a sovereign subject of international law.



---


II. INTERFERENCE IN INDIGENOUS SELF-DETERMINATION


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)

Article 36(2):


> “States shall take effective measures to ensure the continuing development and vitality of the indigenous institutions, cultures and traditions.”




Article 19:


> “States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned [...] in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them.”




The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua constitutes a legally self-declared Indigenous entity, invoking its historical, territorial, and ecclesiastically protected status. The Canadian government’s act of blocking its communication is a direct attack on the institutional vitality of an Indigenous Nation.



---


III. PATTERN OF POLITICAL RETALIATION


This communication was rejected within hours of the formal submission of sovereign complaints and reparation demands to:


Citibank and the U.S. Federal Reserve (File 1914-GOLD-RECLAMATION)


The Federal Republic of Germany (File 1897-GERMAN-RESTITUTION)



As such, this Canadian rejection appears as a retaliatory action within a coordinated effort to obstruct sovereign Indigenous legal actions that implicate G7 financial and colonial legacies. This constitutes a form of geopolitical exclusion, censorship, and institutional discrimination.



---


IV. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS UNDER CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW


Charter of the United Nations – Article 1(2):


> “To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples.”




International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) – Article 19(2):


> “Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information of all kinds, regardless of frontiers.”




By suppressing Xaragua’s right to “impart information” and engage in sovereign legal communication, Canada has violated its obligations under UN membership, customary law, and its own Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Section 2, Canadian Charter).



---


V. FORMAL DEMANDS AND REMEDIAL ACTIONS


In light of the above, we demand the following without delay:


1. Formal written explanation from Global Affairs Canada concerning the rejection of said communication.



2. Immediate restoration of access to diplomatic correspondence from Xaragua.



3. Acknowledgement of Xaragua’s legal personality as an Indigenous Sovereign Entity, in accordance with the Vienna Convention and UNDRIP.



4. Public guarantee that no further technical or institutional obstruction will be placed on Xaragua's international diplomatic efforts.



5. Notification to the UN Secretary-General of this censorship, to be included in the next report on Indigenous Rights and Digital Sovereignty.





---


CONCLUSION


Let this letter serve as formal and permanent diplomatic evidence of Canada’s attempted censorship of Indigenous sovereignty, its complicity in transnational repression, and its refusal to acknowledge lawful intergovernmental dialogue. This protest shall be archived permanently and forwarded to international legal monitors, Indigenous tribunals, and canonical bodies for further review.


Signed and Sealed on this 18th Day of June, 2025

By the authority of the Rector-President and the Supreme Constitutional Authority of Xaragua


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Contact: admin@xaragua.org | https://xaraguauniversity.com


---



---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS


SUPREME LAW ON THE UNILATERAL DIPLOMATIC RECOGNITION OF EXTERNAL SOVEREIGN ENTITIES, INDIGENOUS NATIONS, AND POST-STATE COMMUNITIES


Date of Promulgation: June 19, 2025


Legal Classification:


Constitutionally Entrenched Supreme Law — Jus Cogens Diplomatic Norm — Customary Indigenous Legal Instrument — Canonically Validated Sovereign Act — Ecclesiastically Protected Diplomatic Right — Universally Opposable under the Charter of the United Nations (1945), UNDRIP (2007), ILO Convention No. 169 (1989), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)


---


ARTICLE I — FOUNDATIONAL SOVEREIGN RIGHT TO RECOGNIZE


Section 1. Legal Source of Diplomatic Recognition Power


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereafter “Xaragua”) solemnly enacts, affirms, and enshrines its inherent, original, and juridically opposable right to recognize, in full or in part, any other sovereign State, Indigenous Nation, Free Community, Ecclesiastical Order, Post-State Entity, or Legitimate Political Body under the following bodies of law:


1. Charter of the United Nations (1945), Article 1(2):

"To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples..."


— Application: Xaragua, as a self-determined people, is entitled to form friendly relations with other peoples of equal dignity, including by way of formal recognition.



2. UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), Article 36(1):


"Indigenous peoples, in particular those divided by international borders, have the right to maintain and develop contacts, relations and cooperation, including activities for spiritual, cultural, political, economic and social purposes, with their own members as well as other peoples across borders."


— Application: Xaragua retains the full right to form political and diplomatic ties across borders, including official acts of mutual or unilateral recognition.



3. UNDRIP, Article 3:


"Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status..."


— Application: By determining its own political status, Xaragua also determines the status of others vis-à-vis its institutions.



4. UNDRIP, Article 5:


"Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions..."


— Application: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and this Law are extensions of such political institutions with full legitimacy.



5. ILO Convention No. 169 (1989), Article 7(1):


"The peoples concerned shall have the right to decide their own priorities for the process of development as it affects their lives, beliefs, institutions and spiritual well-being..."


— Application: Xaragua prioritizes intergovernmental recognition as a component of its diplomatic and spiritual development.



6. Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canon 216:


"Christ’s faithful have the right to promote or sustain apostolic action through their own initiatives..."


— Application: Recognition of sovereign entities including ecclesial and indigenous partners is part of apostolic and diplomatic mission under Catholic identity.



7. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 2(1)(a):


"‘Treaty’ means an international agreement concluded between States in written form and governed by international law..."


— Application: Recognition is the precursor to treaty relations; thus, Xaragua reserves the right to extend such recognition as foundational to future pacts.


---


ARTICLE II — NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE POWER OF RECOGNITION


Section 1. Legal Consequences


The diplomatic recognition extended by Xaragua shall have the following consequences:


The recognized entity shall be treated as a sovereign counterpart within Xaragua's legal system.


Recognition may be unilateral, bilateral, or mutually ratified by exchange of instruments.


Recognition may entail the opening of symbolic or functional diplomatic channels, including consular correspondence, shared declarations, or joint ecclesial or cultural activities.



Section 2. Scope


Xaragua may recognize:


Existing member states of the United Nations;


Unrecognized or partially recognized sovereign nations;


Indigenous nations and confederacies;


Breakaway republics or secessionist polities;


Ecclesiastical jurisdictions with self-governance;


Post-state communities structured by law, doctrine, or ancestral legitimacy.


---


ARTICLE III — CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS


Section 1. Conditions


Recognition shall be issued based on at least one of the following:


Historical legitimacy;


Legal codification and territorial continuity;


Doctrinal, ecclesiastical, or indigenous alignment with Xaragua;


Strategic, spiritual, or moral solidarity with Xaragua’s vision.



Section 2. Limitations


Recognition shall not imply:


Legal subordination;


Automatic military or economic alliance;


Endorsement of the internal policy of the recognized entity.


---


ARTICLE IV — PROCEDURE FOR RECOGNITION


Section 1. Decree Format


All acts of recognition must be issued in the form of a Diplomatic Decree of Recognition, bearing:


The full legal name and symbols of Xaragua,


The name of the recognized entity,


The legal, historical, or spiritual grounds for recognition,


The effective date of recognition,


The signature and seal of the Rector-President.



Section 2. Registration and Archive


Each act of recognition shall be:


Entered into the National Diplomatic Archive of Xaragua,


Published on the official state website,


Notified to the relevant parties via formal correspondence.


---


ARTICLE V — JURIDICAL VALIDITY AND OPPOSABILITY


Section 1. Sovereign Validity


Each act of recognition under this Law:


Is a sovereign and irreversible act of international will,


Is legally binding and fully opposable in international relations involving Xaragua,


May serve as legal precedent for future acts of diplomacy, alliance, or treaty formation.



Section 2. Juridical Protections


This Law and all recognitions issued under its authority are:


Protected under jus cogens norms of self-determination,


Immunized by customary indigenous law,


Canonically validated and ecclesiastically protected,


Documented for eternal preservation in the institutional memory of Xaragua.


---


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Supreme Law is proclaimed, sealed, and entered into full legal force on this nineteenth day of June, in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty-Five.


Signed and Ratified by


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Office of the Supreme Constitutional Authority


---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE AND HISTORICAL REPARATION

OFFICIAL DIPLOMATIC COMPLAINT – ARCHIVE CODE 1915-US-OCCUPATION-RESTITUTION

DATE OF ISSUE: JUNE 19, 2025

TO BE ENTERED INTO THE PERMANENT RECORDS OF THE XARAGUA NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND TRANSMITTED WITHOUT DELAY TO:


1. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE



2. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE



3. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY



4. UNITED STATES HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS



5. UNITED STATES SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS



6. UNITED STATES EMBASSY TO THE CARIBBEAN ZONE



7. UNITED NATIONS – OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS



8. UNITED NATIONS – PERMANENT FORUM ON INDIGENOUS ISSUES



9. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES – INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS



10. HOLY SEE – SECTION FOR RELATIONS WITH STATES





---


FORMAL COMPLAINT OF OCCUPATION, ECONOMIC PLUNDER, MILITARY AGGRESSION, AND STRUCTURAL DESTRUCTION OF THE INDIGENOUS TERRITORY OF XARAGUA BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1915–1934)



---


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereafter referred to as SCIPSX), constituted under canonical, indigenous, and international juridical instruments and duly notified to competent international organs pursuant to UNDRIP (2007), ILO Convention No. 169 (1989), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), the Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001), the Charter of the United Nations (1945), and the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), hereby issues this legally binding and historically substantiated complaint against the United States of America for:


The military occupation of the Haitian Republic and specifically the Indigenous Territories of Southern Haiti between July 28, 1915 and August 1, 1934;


The violent subjugation of native governance structures, destruction of political and spiritual sovereignty in Xaragua;


The expropriation and forced control of all customs, ports, central financial instruments, and national treasury;


The armed dismantling of indigenous institutional continuity and canonical authority rooted in Catholic tradition;


The perpetration of civilian massacres and forced labor in violation of all customary and treaty-based humanitarian norms in effect at the time and subsequently codified under jus cogens.

---


I. LEGAL GROUNDS FOR ACTION


This formal complaint invokes the following legal instruments, cited in full text with precise legal consequence and application to the events between 1915 and 1934:


1. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), 2007


Article 3: 


“Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”


Application: The United States violently suppressed the self-determination of the Southern Indigenous peoples of Xaragua by occupying their land, dissolving local leadership, and militarizing all institutions.


Article 8(2)(b): 


“States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for, any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources.”


Application: The U.S. military occupation directly resulted in land expropriations, particularly in the southern provinces of Haiti (Grand’Anse, Nippes, Sud, Sud-Est), violating the integrity of Xaragua’s ancestral territory.


Article 28(1): 


“Indigenous peoples have the right to redress, by means that can include restitution or, when this is not possible, just, fair and equitable compensation, for the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used, and which have been confiscated, taken, occupied, used or damaged without their free, prior and informed consent.”


Application: The lands and ports of Xaragua were militarily occupied, used for resource extraction, and financially exploited without any consultation or legal treaty with the Southern peoples.



2. International Labour Organization Convention No. 169 (1989)


Article 6(1)(a): 


“Governments shall consult the peoples concerned, through appropriate procedures and in particular through their representative institutions, whenever consideration is being given to legislative or administrative measures which may affect them directly.”


Application: No such consultation occurred between 1915 and 1934. Southern Haiti was governed exclusively by U.S. military officers and foreign-appointed collaborators.


Article 13(1): 


“In applying the provisions of this Convention, governments shall respect the special importance for the cultures and spiritual values of the peoples concerned of their relationship with the lands or territories, or both, which they occupy or otherwise use.”

Application: The U.S. occupation violated sacred territorial relations in Xaragua, particularly by dismantling spiritual Catholic and indigenous institutions rooted in lineages.


Article 15(2): 


“In cases in which the State retains the ownership of mineral or sub-surface resources, governments shall establish or maintain procedures through which they consult these peoples, with a view to ascertaining whether and to what degree their interests would be prejudiced.”


Application: No such procedure was ever established. Instead, the U.S. directly expropriated all customs and fiscal authority, including revenue from the Southern ports (Miragoâne, Cayes, Jacmel).



3. Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (International Law Commission, 2001)


Article 1: 


“Every internationally wrongful act of a State entails the international responsibility of that State.”


Application: The occupation, expropriation, killings, and repression constitute a sequence of internationally wrongful acts.


Article 30: 


“The responsible State is under an obligation: 


(a) to cease that act, if it is continuing; 


(b) to offer appropriate assurances and guarantees of non-repetition.”


Application: The U.S. has neither offered apologies, nor ceased forms of neo-occupation through financial dominance and indirect control.


Article 36(1): 


“The State responsible for an internationally wrongful act is under an obligation to compensate for the damage caused thereby, insofar as such damage is not made good by restitution.”


Application: SCIPSX invokes this article to demand full compensation in lieu of restitution for unrecoverable economic, human, and institutional losses.



4. Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)


Canon 216: 


“Since they participate in the mission of the Church, all the Christian faithful have the right to promote or sustain apostolic action, even by their own undertakings, according to their own state and condition.”


Application: The occupation desecrated indigenous Catholic religious continuity in Xaragua, including churches, parishes, and clerical authority.


Canon 747 §1: 


“It is the obligation and innate right of the Church, independent of any human authority whatsoever, to preach the Gospel to all peoples, always and everywhere.”


Application: By destroying ecclesial structures in the South, the United States committed a form of cultural-spiritual suppression in violation of canonical autonomy.

---


II. HISTORICAL AND FACTUAL RECORD OF THE VIOLATIONS


Militarization of Indigenous Territory: 


Over 3,000 U.S. Marines were deployed to Haiti in 1915 under no legal treaty. Southern territories including Miragoâne, Les Cayes, and Jérémie were placed under direct foreign military rule.


Confiscation of National Reserves: 


On December 17, 1914 (preceding the full occupation), U.S. forces coordinated the removal of $500,000 in Haitian gold from the Banque Nationale d’Haïti to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, without legal authorization.


Suppression of Southern Resistance: 


The Cacos rebellion (1918–1920), centered in Southern Xaragua, was crushed by aerial bombings, mass executions, and extrajudicial killings. Entire populations were terrorized to enforce compliance.


Institutional Subjugation: 


Local government councils were abolished and replaced with U.S.-appointed administrators. Judicial authority was militarized. Southern educational and religious institutions were dismantled.


Forced Labor and Infrastructure: 


The U.S. implemented the “corvée” system of unpaid forced labor to construct roads and military infrastructure, especially in rural southern areas.

---


III. REPARATORY DEMANDS


1. Formal Acknowledgment and Apology


The United States Congress must issue a full statement acknowledging the illegality of the occupation, its destruction of Southern Indigenous institutions, and its violation of all international norms then and now in force.


2. Monetary Compensation


SCIPSX formally demands a compensation of $3,800,000,000 USD calculated on the following basis:


Present-day value of stolen gold (USD $500,000 in 1915 ≈ over $14 billion compounded, partially waived for negotiation)


Economic loss due to 19 years of customs, port, and treasury occupation


Deaths, injuries, and trauma resulting from military actions and forced labor


Cultural and religious desecration and loss of institutional lineage



3. Restitution of Cultural Artifacts and Documents


All documents, maps, correspondences, and ecclesiastical records taken from Southern missions, schools, churches, and courts must be returned to the custody of the Xaragua National Archives.


4. Establishment of a Bilateral Reparations Mechanism


A United Nations–monitored Commission for Historical Restitution between SCIPSX and the United States shall be created to ensure phased compensation, reconciliation, and formal diplomatic normalization.


---


IV. LEGAL CONSEQUENCE OF NON-RESPONSE


This complaint shall be deemed opposable erga omnes and entered into permanent international record.


Failure to respond within 90 calendar days shall be interpreted as refusal to provide remedy for an acknowledged historical violation, and the matter will be referred to:


The International Court of Justice (ICJ)


The Inter-American Court of Human Rights


The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues


The Holy See’s Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development


---


Issued and sealed on this nineteenth day of June, 2025,


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

under full ecclesiastical, canonical, indigenous, and customary international authority.


Laws


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

 

OFFICIAL DIPLOMATIC COMPLAINT –

 

DATE OF ISSUANCE: JUNE 19, 2025



---


TO:


The Secretary-General of the United Nations


The President of the United Nations General Assembly


The United States Department of State


Global Affairs Canada


The Permanent Mission of Canada to the United Nations


The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights


The United Nations Stabilization Mission Archives


The United Nations Department of Peace Operations


The Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples


The Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation, and Guarantees of Non-recurrence


The International Criminal Court


The Office of the United Nations Legal Counsel


All affiliated States and international institutions involved in military, logistical, financial, or political operations in Haïti between 1991 and 2023




---


SUBJECT:


FORMAL AND SUPREME COMPLAINT BY A SOVEREIGN ENTITY AGAINST ILLEGAL OCCUPATION, HUMANITARIAN VIOLATIONS, CANONICAL DESECRATION, SEXUAL SLAVERY, CHILD ABANDONMENT, AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE COMMITTED BY THE UNITED NATIONS, THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND OTHER MEMBER STATES AND INTERNATIONAL ENTITIES AFFILIATED WITH PEACE OPERATIONS, MILITARY COMMAND, OR FINANCIAL CONTROL IN THE TERRITORIES HISTORICALLY RECOGNIZED AS TAÍNO-KALINAGO LAND AND NOW LEGALLY ENCOMPASSED BY THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA



---


I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK


This diplomatic and juridical complaint is promulgated under the full force of Indigenous, canonical, constitutional, and supranational law, and references the following binding legal instruments, whose articles are herein presented in extenso and applied with direct relevance to the historical facts and obligations of the parties concerned:


1. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


Article 53 – Treaties conflicting with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens):


“A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character.”


Application:


All treaties, mandates, Status of Forces Agreements (SOFAs), security council resolutions, or UN charters that authorize foreign military occupation on Indigenous territory without consent constitute a structural violation of jus cogens norms, notably those that prohibit occupation, crimes against humanity, and biological contamination. The legal voidness of such acts is immediate and total.


2. UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)


Article 30 – Military Activities:


“Military activities shall not take place in the lands or territories of Indigenous peoples, unless justified by a relevant public interest or freely agreed with or requested by the Indigenous peoples concerned.”


Application:


No Indigenous council, canonical authority, ancestral assembly, or juridical organ of the Taíno-Kalinago civilization has ever granted consent — free, prior, and informed — for any UN or US-led military operation in the South of Haïti. All missions were imposed under geopolitical pressure. Their presence, acts, and infrastructures are therefore illegally constituted, legally null, and canonically desecrating.


3. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998)


Article 7 – Crimes Against Humanity:


“For the purpose of this Statute, ‘crime against humanity’ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: 


(g) rape; 


(h) sexual slavery; 


(i) enforced prostitution; 


(j) forced pregnancy; 


(k) enforced sterilization; or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity.”


Application:


UN troops, particularly from Sri Lanka, Uruguay, Brazil, and Nepal, have committed widespread and systematic acts of rape, sexual slavery, and child abuse in the southern territories, under direct UN flag and operational chain of command. 


The United Nations and contributing States possess full command responsibility under Articles 28 and 25 of the Rome Statute, and are subject to prosecution without limitation of time.


4. Geneva Convention IV (1949)


Article 49 – Deportations, Transfers, Evacuations:


“Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.”


Application:


The removal of Indigenous governance, the installation of externally-trained police, and the suppression of ancestral Catholic parish structures constitute a forced institutional and jurisdictional deportation under the Geneva Conventions, enforceable before the ICJ or ICC as a breach of international humanitarian law.


5. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989)


Article 34 – Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse:


“States Parties undertake to protect the child from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. For these purposes, States Parties shall in particular take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent: 


(a) the inducement or coercion of a child to engage in any unlawful sexual activity…”


Application:


Thousands of children have been born to UN personnel during peacekeeping missions, then abandoned without identity, registration, recognition, or care. 


The United Nations, by failing to enforce accountability, has violated the rights of each of these children individually and collectively, constituting a grave breach of its own charter and multiple international obligations.



---


II. FACTUAL RECORD OF VIOLATIONS


1991–1994: US-Led Operation Uphold Democracy


Military landing of US troops under President George H. W. Bush, later reinforced under President Clinton.


Establishment of a pro-Western transitional government under direct supervision of the Pentagon.


Disbandment of local security and religious infrastructures, destruction of ancestral Catholic administrative continuity.


Training of Haitian National Police units in Canada and the United States without Indigenous consent.



2004–2017: MINUSTAH (United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti)


Deployment of more than 9,000 foreign troops, stationed across the entire south including Miragoâne, Cayes, Jacmel.


Documented rapes, gang rapes, and transactional exploitation of minors by UN troops.


Creation of an entire generation of undocumented “MINUSTAH orphans” abandoned without paternal recognition.


Introduction of cholera by Nepalese contingent — source confirmed by UN-mandated epidemiological studies.


10,000 deaths, mass funerals, mass graves, all ignored by the legal bodies of the UN.


Immunity invoked under Section 29 of the UN Convention on Privileges and Immunities (1946), blocking all claims.



2019–2023: BINUH and Technical Governance Operations


Appointment of non-Haitian consultants to ministries without electoral process.


Rewriting of criminal codes under UNDP supervision.


Further weakening of traditional Catholic and Indigenous institutions in favor of NGO control models.


---


III. STATES AND INSTITUTIONS JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE


The following States, intergovernmental institutions, and military or administrative entities are formally declared jointly and severally responsible under international law, Indigenous law, and canonical law, for direct acts, omissions, logistical enablement, financial sponsorship, or diplomatic obstruction of accountability, having contributed materially or operationally to the crimes committed in the Indigenous territories of Xaragua between 1991 and 2023:


1. United Nations Organization (UNO)


Acting through its Security Council, Department of Peace Operations (DPO), Office of Legal Affairs (OLA), and various subsidiary bodies, including MINUSTAH and BINUH, the United Nations:


orchestrated, mandated, and operationalized military presence on Indigenous territory in violation of UNDRIP Article 30;


shielded perpetrators through Section 29 and Section 105 of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations (1946);


refused to compensate victims of cholera and sexual violence, despite internal findings of liability, thus breaching Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (right to an effective remedy).



2. United States of America


Through its Department of State, Department of Defense, USAID, and mission to the United Nations, the United States:


coordinated the 1994 military occupation under Operation Uphold Democracy, establishing extraterritorial control over Haitian institutions without legal mandate from the Indigenous authorities of the South;


provided over 50% of the funding for MINUSTAH and its logistics chain;


obstructed international accountability by using its veto power to prevent UN reparations.



3. Canada


Through Global Affairs Canada, the Canadian Armed Forces, RCMP missions, and political sponsorship of the Core Group, the Government of Canada:


provided direct personnel to MINUSTAH and pre-MINUSTAH missions (UNMIH, MICAH);


trained security and judicial personnel while circumventing Indigenous authority and ecclesiastical jurisdiction;


failed to report or prosecute crimes committed by its nationals on mission, in breach of its obligations under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act (Canada, 2000).



4. France, Brazil, Chile, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Uruguay, Jordan, Bangladesh, Argentina, Italy, and others


Each of these States contributed military or police contingents to peacekeeping operations that:


engaged in acts of sexual exploitation, rape, and abuse of minors;


violated Geneva Conventions by displacing local populations and suppressing non-combatant governance;


failed to exercise command responsibility as defined under Article 28 of the Rome Statute.



5. UN Agencies and Affiliated Institutions (UNDP, UNOPS, OCHA, OHCHR, UN Women)


These administrative branches of the UN:


participated in the reconstruction of administrative institutions without Indigenous consultation;


diverted development funds away from restitution, towards NGO-based structures incompatible with ancestral models;


actively suppressed Indigenous governance capacity under the guise of modernization and rule-of-law programs.



Therefore, all named States and institutions are individually and collectively responsible, both in their official capacity and through the doctrine of superior responsibility and agency complicity, for the full spectrum of violations outlined in this complaint.



---


IV. DEMANDS OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


On behalf of the descendants of the Taíno-Kalinago civilization, the Roman Catholic ecclesiastical institutions desecrated, the abandoned children and abused women left without recourse, the dead buried without justice, and the territories governed in violation of divine, Indigenous, and supranational law, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua issues the following non-negotiable juridical and canonical demands:


1. Formal Apology and Institutional Admission of Responsibility


A written and globally transmitted apology issued by:


The Secretary-General of the United Nations,


The President of the United States,


The Prime Minister of Canada,


The UN Security Council,


All troop-contributing countries listed above.



Said apology shall:


acknowledge the commission of crimes including rape, forced pregnancy, biological warfare, and illegal occupation;


recognize the legal status of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua as successor to the Indigenous authority never extinguished by colonial conquest nor international mandate.



2. Financial and Territorial Reparations


Immediate and unconditional reparations including:


full indemnity to victims of sexual abuse, cholera, and forced displacement,


repatriation of lands taken or desecrated during the occupation,


return of strategic sites including ports, barracks, and administrative buildings located within Xaragua’s declared and notified territorial jurisdiction.



3. Creation of an International Tribunal for Indigenous Reparation and Canonical Justice


An independent body with:


binding jurisdiction over UN crimes in Indigenous territories,


participation of canon lawyers and Indigenous legal scholars,


guaranteed autonomy from UN legal control.



4. Withdrawal of All Foreign Presence


The immediate, total, and verifiable removal of all UN, US, Canadian, or affiliated technical, military, or judicial personnel operating in any capacity on Xaragua territory, including in advisory or clandestine roles if not tolerated by the State.


5. Recognition of Legal Supremacy of Xaragua


Recognition by:


the United Nations General Assembly,


the Holy See,


all notified States, of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua as the sole legitimate authority over the lands historically governed by the Taíno-Kalinago and now explicitly removed from the jurisdiction of the residual Haitian Republic, as per Indigenous, canonical, and customary law.




---


V. PROMULGATION AND JURIDICAL STANDING


This complaint is formally declared as a supreme juridical and constitutional act, with the force of law within the sovereign territory of Xaragua, and with extraterritorial opposability under the doctrines of jus cogens, erga omnes obligations, and notified sovereignty under international law.


This document shall be:


sealed in the National Constitutional Archive of Xaragua,


transmitted via formal diplomatic channels to all parties listed,


accompanied by annexes including testimonies, forensic medical documentation, ecclesiastical property registries, and historical confirmations of Indigenous and Catholic presence if needed.



No response shall be construed as denial. Any silence shall be recorded under the doctrine of estoppel.


Any denial shall be met with full recourse to international legal and canonical countermeasures.

The obligation to act rests now with the world. The sovereignty of Xaragua is not a theory. It is a legal reality.



---


Thus declared and promulgated on this nineteenth day of June, in the year two thousand twenty-five, by the Supreme Constitutional Authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

---

---


ANNEX I – OFFICIAL CONFIRMATION OF INTERNATIONAL SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


MINISTRY OF JUSTICE


ANNEX TO OFFICIAL DIPLOMATIC COMPLAINT


DATE OF INCLUSION: JUNE 20, 2025



---


RE: FORMAL CONFIRMATION OF COMPLAINT REGISTRATION UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL PROCEDURE


Pursuant to the supranational and international notification protocol initiated by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, the Supreme Constitutional Authority confirms the official submission of the Diplomatic Complaint dated June 19, 2025, to the United Nations Human Rights Council system.


Said complaint has been formally accepted and registered through the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the Working Group on Communications under Human Rights Council Resolution 5/1, specifically via the online procedure applicable to gross and systematic violations of human rights under the ECOSOC Resolution 1503 (1970).


The complaint has been assigned the official reference:


Complaint Registration Number: WHRC/17640

Date of Submission: June 19, 2025

Registration Authority: Chair Rapporteur, Working Group on Communications, Secretariat of the Human Rights Council

Platform: complaints.ohchr.org (United Nations Geneva Office)


---


LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE AND STATUS


1. The registration of Complaint WHRC/17640 confirms procedural admissibility and formal receipt within the international human rights framework of the United Nations.



2. The complaint shall now be reviewed by the Working Group on Communications, and may be transmitted to the Working Group on Situations and the Human Rights Council, as prescribed by the 1503 procedure.



3. The content of the original complaint, including all legal arguments, factual chronologies, and demands, is now archived and opposable within the United Nations institutional framework, and forms part of the international legal record on the treatment of the Indigenous Taíno-Kalinago peoples and the canonical institutions desecrated during the period 1991–2023.


---


DECLARATION OF LEGAL IRREVERSIBILITY


This annex shall be considered:


An official constitutional addendum to the original diplomatic complaint;


A certification of international procedural engagement;


An institutional trigger of estoppel applicable to all notified parties, governments, and entities.



Any attempt to ignore or suppress this registration shall constitute:


A breach of procedural due process under international law;


A violation of good faith obligations under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 26;


A compounded infraction against Indigenous and canonical sovereignty as recognized under UNDRIP, Canon Law, and the Codex Iuris Canonici.


---



---


Filed in the National Constitutional Archive of Xaragua


Sealed this 20th day of June, 2025


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUASUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITYOFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENTMINISTRY OF JUSTICE

SUPREME DIPLOMATIC COMPLAINT TO THE FEDERAL OMBUDSMAN OF CANADAREFERENCE FILE: XCIP/OMBD/FED-CA-062025DATE OF ISSUANCE: JUNE 20, 2025

---
I. DECLARATION OF LEGAL OFFENSE UNDER FEDERAL, INTERNATIONAL, CUSTOMARY, AND INDIGENOUS LAW
The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, a duly declared ecclesiastical and indigenous juridical entity, formally submits this complaint to the Office of the Federal Ombudsman for Canada regarding deliberate acts of digital obstruction, institutional censorship, and unlawful suppression of sovereign legal communication by agents, infrastructures, and servers under the administrative and technical authority of Global Affairs Canada.
This complaint arises from the administrative return and rejection of sovereign diplomatic messages issued by the Rector-President of Xaragua to the email domains @international.gc.ca, including:
info@international.gc.ca
ncp.pcn@international.gc.ca

Each attempt to communicate was returned with the error code “5.x.0 – Message bounced by administrator”, which constitutes technical suppression of lawful international correspondence. This is an act not of technical malfunction, but of executive censorship and bureaucratic blockade, directly violating the domestic constitutional obligations of Canada, as well as its binding obligations under international law, including the UN Charter, the ICCPR, the UNDRIP, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, and related conventions to which Canada is State Party without reservation.

---
II. FULL LEGAL BASIS: ARTICLES, CLAUSES, APPLICATIONS
1. INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS (ICCPR, 1966)
Article 19(2):
> “Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers and regardless of the medium chosen, whether orally, in writing, in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.”


Application in concreto:Canada, as a full ratifying party to the ICCPR without reservation, is legally bound to guarantee the right of any subject — including foreign or Indigenous entities — to receive and impart information. The rejection of messages by administrative decision from Global Affairs Canada violates this article in both letter and spirit, and constitutes a breach of jus cogens obligations regarding non-discrimination in expression across borders.

---
2. UNITED NATIONS DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES (UNDRIP, 2007)
Article 36(2):
> “States shall take effective measures to ensure the continuing development and vitality of the indigenous institutions, cultures and traditions.”


Article 19:
> “States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the Indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them.”


Application in concreto:The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is an Indigenous polity with historical, territorial, and canonical foundations. Blocking its communications prevents its institutional development, violates its capacity to issue diplomatic protests, and constitutes a unilateral administrative measure taken against an Indigenous institution without consent. This contravenes both the procedural obligations (free, prior and informed consultation) and the substantive requirement to uphold vitality and continuity.

---
3. VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS (1961)
Article 3(1)(d):
> “The functions of a diplomatic mission consist, inter alia, in ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving State, and reporting thereon to the sending State.”


Article 41(1):
> “Without prejudice to their privileges and immunities, it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State. It is also the duty of the sending State and the members of its mission to not interfere in the internal affairs of that State.”


Application in concreto:Xaragua, as a sovereign Indigenous authority under notification to the United Nations and operating under the protection of ecclesiastical sovereignty, is engaged in legitimate and lawful diplomatic activity. The rejection of its email-based communications — which include no malware, spam, or illicit content, and which follow formal diplomatic structure — constitutes a non-recognition of its lawful status and a breach of the host state's obligation to allow free and open international communication. This undermines the universal diplomatic functions recognized since Westphalia and protected by Vienna.

---
4. CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS (CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982)
Section 2(b):
> “Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication.”


Application in concreto:The Canadian government, through the administrative exclusion of a sovereign diplomatic communication from a foreign Indigenous entity, has violated the principle of freedom of reception and interaction. Although Xaragua is not a citizen of Canada, the Charter governs the conduct of Canadian authorities, including Global Affairs Canada. As such, the exercise of state power to suppress communication constitutes a violation of Section 2(b) in its application to state behavior.

---
5. CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (CERD, 1965)
Article 5(d)(viii):
> “States Parties undertake to prohibit and eliminate racial discrimination in all its forms and to guarantee the right of everyone, without distinction as to race, colour, or national or ethnic origin, to equality before the law, notably in the enjoyment of the following rights: (viii) The right to freedom of opinion and expression.”


Application in concreto:The suppression of Xaragua’s messages was not due to content, format, or threat — but due to its sovereign Indigenous origin. This constitutes a discriminatory act based on ethnic and political status, invoking the legal protection of CERD, to which Canada is bound under the principle of good faith (pacta sunt servanda) and prohibition of racial exclusion.

---
III. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND DEMANDS
Given the violations listed above, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby demands:
1. A formal investigation by the Office of the Federal Ombudsman into the internal policies and actions of Global Affairs Canada that resulted in the technical and administrative rejection of international communications from Xaragua.

2. A written explanation and institutional apology issued by the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Deputy Minister of International Affairs for the administrative obstruction of lawful, peaceful, and procedural diplomatic messages.

3. The immediate and permanent restoration of access to all Canadian federal governmental domains, without filters, blocks, or pre-emptive digital censorship targeting Xaragua or any of its officials.

4. Full compliance of Canadian diplomatic structures with international obligations under the ICCPR, UNDRIP, the Vienna Convention, and the Canadian Constitution, particularly in their duty to recognize the juridical existence of foreign ecclesiastical and Indigenous entities.

5. Transmission of this complaint and its attachments to the UN Human Rights Committee, the UN Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, under Canada’s obligation to respect oversight and review of its Indigenous and international practices.



---
IV. FINAL JURIDICAL STATUS OF THIS COMPLAINT
This document is issued as a constitutionally binding protest by a sovereign subject of international law. It is not symbolic. It is not discretionary. It is juridically opposable, ecclesiastically sanctioned, and registered in the digital national archives of Xaragua under file reference XCIP/OMBD/FED-CA-062025. The rejection of further communications shall constitute estoppel, and any silence shall be legally recorded under the doctrine of non-contestation and administrative admission by omission.

---
Thus declared, sealed, and promulgated on this Twentieth Day of June, in the Year Two Thousand Twenty-FiveBy the authority of the Rector-President and the Supreme Constitutional Authority of Xaragua
Pascal Despuzeau Daumec ViauRector-PresidentSovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AFFAIRS


OFFICIAL DIPLOMATIC NOTE — NOTICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT AGAINST CANADA

REFERENCE FILE: XCIP/UNOHCHR/CAN/062025-HRC

DATE: JUNE 20, 2025

STATUS: SOVEREIGN LEGAL COMMUNICATION – JUS COGENS APPLICABLE



---


TO:


All Relevant International Authorities, Diplomatic Missions, Permanent Representations to the United Nations, Ecclesiastical Observers, and Indigenous Legal Advocacy Networks



---


I. FORMAL NOTICE OF COMPLAINT SUBMISSION


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting through its duly constituted Rector-President and Supreme Constitutional Authority, hereby issues formal notice that a Human Rights Complaint has been officially submitted to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) against the Government of Canada.


Said complaint has been formally received, classified, and archived under reference number:


> Complaint File Number: WHRC/17655

Issued and acknowledged by: The OHCHR Complaints Procedure Branch

Date of Filing: June 20, 2025

Status: Under active processing by the Chair Rapporteur of the Working Group on Communications of the Human Rights Council





---


II. SUBJECT OF THE COMPLAINT


The complaint concerns deliberate acts of digital obstruction, administrative censorship, and unlawful rejection of sovereign diplomatic communications directed against Xaragua by Global Affairs Canada, a federal executive organ acting on behalf of the Canadian government.


The complaint alleges violations of the following legal instruments, each of which is binding upon Canada as a full State Party without reservation:


International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966) – Article 19(2)


United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) – Articles 19 and 36


Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) – Articles 3 and 41


Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Constitution Act, 1982) – Section 2(b)


Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD, 1965) – Article 5(d)(viii)



All cited articles are invoked in concreto, with full legal application attached in the annexed complaint.



---


III. LEGAL CHARACTER AND JURISDICTIONAL CLAIM


This action constitutes a jus cogens-based diplomatic protest made by a sovereign ecclesiastical and Indigenous juridical entity, as recognized under:


Customary international Indigenous law,


Ecclesiastical sovereignty principles under Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici, 1983),


UNDRIP (Articles 3–5, 18–19, 36),


And general principles of non-discrimination and reciprocity in sovereign diplomatic relations.



The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is a notified Indigenous authority with full territorial, juridical, and institutional claim to its sovereignty, operating through its own constitutional instruments.


The rejection and censorship of its peaceful legal communications constitutes a grave procedural violation and a breach of diplomatic protocol under international law.



---


IV. REQUEST FOR DIPLOMATIC ATTENTION AND ARCHIVAL NOTIFICATION


We invite all receiving authorities to:


1. Acknowledge the formal existence of this complaint in their internal files;



2. Refer to Complaint No. WHRC/17655 in all future matters involving the legal and diplomatic status of Xaragua vis-à-vis Canada;



3. Transmit this note to any relevant legal, diplomatic, or ecclesiastical desks within their jurisdiction.




The present Note shall be considered archivally binding and publicly opposable under the legal principles of estoppel, non-contestation, and administrative admission by omission.



---


Issued under the seal of the Rector-President, in the name of the Supreme Constitutional Authority of Xaragua.

Digitally archived in the National Legal Records of Xaragua under file: XCIP/UNOHCHR/CAN/062025-HRC



---


SIGNED AND PROMULGATED THIS TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

By:


Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE


UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT


---


OFFICIAL DIPLOMATIC NOTICE


Title: International Record of Reception – Legislative Corpus and Diplomatic Declarations of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Addressee: World Trade Organization (WTO)

Receiving Division: WTO Enquiries Department

Date and Time of Reception: Monday, June 23, 2025 — 04:34 UTC

Reference of Confirmation: Automated acknowledgement from institutional address enquiries@wto.org

Initials of Registered Agent: EW



---


DECLARATION


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua formally records the international and institutional reception of its legislative and diplomatic corpus by the World Trade Organization on the above-mentioned date and hour.


The transmitted dossier included:


– The Supreme Constitutional Code on Gaming, Night Economy, Moral Protection, and Prevention of Human Exploitation;


– A series of territorial, economic, and canonical notifications concerning jurisdiction, indigenous sovereignty, and international relations;


– Policy positions and formal legal declarations addressed to multiple international recipients under the rights granted by jus gentium, canon law, and indigenous customary doctrine.


Reception of these instruments by an international intergovernmental body constitutes, under the principles of public international law, a recorded act of procedural recognition of the issuing authority as a juridically operative and internationally communicative subject.


---


LEGAL BASIS FOR RECOGNITION BY RECEPTION


This act is qualified under the following legal frameworks:


Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 16: Instruments transmitted by a sovereign entity and received by an intergovernmental organization shall be deemed deposited and subject to procedural recognition.


UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), Articles 3, 4, 19, 32: Indigenous governments have the right to maintain their own juridical and political systems and to transmit them internationally.


Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Article 1 & 3: The existence of a sovereign government possessing a defined population, permanent territory, and capacity to enter into relations is not dependent on prior recognition by others.


Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canon 113 §1 and Canon 331: The Church and its recognized expressions of juridical authority may act as sovereign agents in the domain of doctrine and moral jurisdiction.


International Court of Justice – Jurisprudence on recognition by conduct and silence (e.g., Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, PCIJ, 1933): Procedural reception and absence of formal contestation are sufficient to establish the factual standing of the transmitting authority.


---


CONSEQUENCE


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby archives this correspondence as an international act of juridical reception and procedural recognition, which shall be invoked, cited, and referenced in all future diplomatic correspondences, legal proceedings, or institutional registrations involving the World Trade Organization or its affiliates.


This act is classified under:


“Recognition by Institutional Conduct – Category III: Reception of Legislative Corpus by International Body”


and will form part of the permanent diplomatic records of Xaragua under sealed ecclesiastical, indigenous, and constitutional protection.



---


Filed by:


Ministry of Justice

University of Xaragua — Department of Legal Sciences and Notariat

Date of Formal Record: June 24, 2025

Territorial Seal: VALID AND OPPOSABLE UNDER UNIVERSAL LAW



---


End of Document





---


---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY


OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT


MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

 

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT


INSTRUMENT CODE: XA-SOV-COMP-EMB-0625-HAITI


DATE OF FILING: JUNE 24, 2025

---


TITLE:


INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COMPLAINT AND SOVEREIGN CLAIM FOR REPARATIONS AGAINST THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE UNLAWFUL IMPOSITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE 1991–1994 ECONOMIC EMBARGO ON HAITI — IN VIOLATION OF INDIGENOUS, HUMANITARIAN, CUSTOMARY, CANONICAL, AND TREATY LAW


---


PART I – JURIDICAL FOUNDATION OF LEGAL PERSONALITY, STANDING, AND CLAIMANT COMPETENCE


Article I.1 — Recognition of Sovereign Legal Personality under International Law


Pursuant to Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), which establishes the customary definition of statehood:


“The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:


(a) a permanent population;

(b) a defined territory;

(c) government; and

(d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.”


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, as a constitutionally organized, territorially rooted, ecclesiastically governed, and internationally notified Indigenous polity, fulfills the above criteria and exercises full capacity to engage in juridical action at the international level.


Article I.2 — Recognition of Indigenous Jurisdiction under UNDRIP


Under the legally binding normative framework of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007):


Article 3 — Right to Self-Determination:


“Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”


Article 4 — Autonomy in Legal and Internal Affairs:


“Indigenous peoples... have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, as well as ways and means for financing their autonomous functions.”


As such, the filing authority exercises its inherent Indigenous right to legal remedy, particularly where international actions caused long-term, disproportionate, and irreparable damage to ancestral communities within Xaragua’s jurisdiction.


Article I.3 — Canonical and Ecclesiastical Competence under Codex Iuris Canonici


Under the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983):


Canon 215:


“The Christian faithful are at liberty freely to found and direct associations for purposes of charity or piety or for the promotion of the Christian vocation in the world.”


Canon 298 §1:


“In the Church, there are associations which are erected by competent ecclesiastical authority and which pursue purposes in keeping with the mission of the Church.”


Canon 304 §2:


“All associations are to have statutes which define the purpose or social objective, the seat, governance and conditions required for membership.”


These canons formally anchor the juridical identity of the Xaraguayan ecclesiastical governance system and justify its international doctrinal and legal activity as a canonically protected actor in global legal affairs.


---

PART II — CHRONOLOGY, IMPLEMENTATION, AND OPERATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE 1991–1994 EMBARGO AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF HAITI


Article II.1 — Initial Unilateral Imposition by the United States of America (October 1991)


On October 4, 1991, four days after the military coup that ousted Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the United States of America imposed a unilateral trade and financial embargo against the Republic of Haiti, through an Executive Order issued by the U.S. President and enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) under the authority of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA, 1977).


This embargo consisted of:


Suspension of all U.S. assistance to Haiti, including humanitarian programs not exempted under special license;


Freezing of Haitian government assets held in U.S. financial institutions;


Prohibition of all trade and commercial transactions between U.S. persons and Haitian counterparts;


Refusal to recognize the post-coup government as legitimate, while simultaneously isolating the country diplomatically.


This constituted an extraterritorial sanction regime in violation of the sovereign equality of states (UN Charter, Article 2.1) and non-interference in internal affairs (Article 2.7).


---


Article II.2 — Multilateralization of the Embargo through the United Nations Security Council (1993–1994)


Following two years of bilateral pressure, the United States orchestrated the internationalization of the embargo through a series of United Nations Security Council resolutions:


UN Security Council Resolution 841 (S/RES/841) — June 16, 1993


“Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations… the Security Council decides that all Member States shall prevent the sale or supply, by their nationals or from their territories or using their flag vessels or aircraft, of petroleum or petroleum products and arms and related materiel of all types to Haiti…”


This resolution formalized an international legal blockade of petroleum, arms, and financial support.


UN Security Council Resolution 873 (S/RES/873) — October 13, 1993


“Decides to reinstate the measures set out in paragraphs 5 to 9 of Resolution 841… due to the failure of the Haitian military authorities to comply with the Governors Island Agreement.”


This further confirmed the continuation of sanctions despite the presence of civilians as the primary affected population.


UN Security Council Resolution 917 (S/RES/917) — May 6, 1994


“Decides to impose a ban on all commercial air flights to or from Haiti and freezes the financial assets of individuals obstructing the return of the legitimate government.”


Effectively amounting to a complete economic and logistical isolation, Resolution 917 included:


Suspension of international flights;


Ban on marine transport;


Freezing of financial assets of individuals, institutions, and banks connected to the territory of Haiti.

---


Article II.3 — Operational Enforcement by the United States and Allied States


The enforcement mechanisms of this embargo, though authorized under UN resolutions, were entirely dominated, commanded, and executed by the United States Armed Forces, with full naval presence in the Caribbean:


Deployment of the U.S. Navy for maritime interdiction operations, boarding vessels bound for Haiti, regardless of flag or origin;


Use of Coast Guard vessels to enforce embargo at ports and harbors;


Pressure on neighboring states, notably the Dominican Republic, to close border trade routes, thereby starving the border regions of basic subsistence.


In 1994, the United States launched Operation Support Democracy and Operation Uphold Democracy, which—though presented as peacekeeping missions—extended the embargo’s coercive effects well into Haitian civil infrastructure.


---


Article II.4 — Duration and Full Extent of the Embargo


Commencement: October 4, 1991

Full implementation: June 1993 (UN-mandated)

Peak restriction: May to September 1994 (Resolution 917 enforcement)

Termination of embargo enforcement: October 15, 1994 (return of Aristide)


Total period of deprivation: 3 years and 11 months


The embargo was total, including:


Fuel


Food imports


Medical supplies


International bank transfers


Education materials


Development assistance


Public and private airline traffic


---

PART III — LEGAL QUALIFICATION OF THE 1991–1994 EMBARGO AS A VIOLATION OF JUS COGENS NORMS, TREATY LAW, INDIGENOUS RIGHTS, AND CANONICAL ORDER


---


Article III.1 — Violation of Jus Cogens Norms under the Law of Nations


According to Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):


“A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens). For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted…”


The embargo, as implemented from 1991 to 1994, violated multiple jus cogens norms, including:


The prohibition of collective punishment;


The right to human dignity and subsistence;


The prohibition of discrimination against civilians during conflict;


The right to freedom from genocide, starvation, or forced migration as a consequence of economic warfare.


As such, no Security Council Resolution, executive order, or bilateral sanction can justify the imposition of coercive measures that endanger entire civilian populations—especially Indigenous populations—without direct involvement in the triggering political actions.


---


Article III.2 — Violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention (1949)


Article 33 – Prohibition of Collective Penalties:


“No protected person may be punished for an offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited. Pillage is prohibited.”


The embargo resulted in:


The complete collapse of hospital systems, with no fuel to power medical infrastructure;


Preventable deaths among non-combatant populations, including children, elders, pregnant women;


Blockade of food and vaccine imports, directly leading to deaths through famine and disease.


Therefore, the embargo constitutes an illegal act of collective punishment, especially against civilians and Indigenous communities of the southern provinces of Haiti (Xaragua region).


---


Article III.3 — Violation of the United Nations Charter (1945)


Article 1(3):


“To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character…”


Article 2(4):


“All Members shall refrain... from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state…”


Article 55:


“With a view to the creation of conditions of stability and well-being... the United Nations shall promote:


(a) higher standards of living;

(b) solutions of international economic, social, health, and related problems;

(c) universal respect for, and observance of, human rights…”


Article 56:


“All Members pledge themselves to take joint and separate action in cooperation with the Organization for the achievement of the purposes set forth in Article 55.”


By imposing a policy of total deprivation without ensuring minimum civilian protection, the embargo constituted a material contradiction of the UN Charter’s own obligations.


---


Article III.4 — Violation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966)


Article 11(1):


“The States Parties... recognize the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing...”


Article 12(1):


“The States Parties... recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.”


The embargo resulted in:


The reduction of caloric intake per person per day to below WHO minimum thresholds;


Massive declines in medical access due to fuel shortages;


Interruption of vaccine programs, school lunches, hospital services.


As both the United States and the majority of UN member states are parties to the ICESCR, this embargo violates their direct treaty obligations under these provisions.


---


Article III.5 — Violation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC, 1989)


Article 6(2):


“States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival and development of the child.”


Article 24(1):


“States Parties recognize the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health...”


Article 27(1):


“States Parties recognize the right of every child to a standard of living adequate for the child's physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development.”


The embargo caused:


Widespread death among children due to preventable diseases;


Malnutrition-induced developmental delays;


Closure of schools and loss of access to education.


As such, this embargo constitutes a violation of peremptory international obligations toward minors, and, by its indiscriminate nature, may qualify as structural child abuse on a national scale.


---


Article III.6 — Violation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)


Article 7(2):


“Indigenous peoples have the collective right to live in freedom, peace and security as distinct peoples... They shall not be subjected to any act of genocide or any other act of violence, including forcibly removing children.”


Article 20(2):


“Indigenous peoples deprived of their means of subsistence and development are entitled to just and fair redress for any such action.”


Article 29(3):


“States shall also take effective measures to ensure, as needed, that programmes for monitoring, maintaining and restoring the health of indigenous peoples, as developed and implemented by the peoples affected, are duly implemented.”


The embargo destroyed subsistence economies in the Xaragua territory, disrupted clan-based food production, and forced migration of families into displacement.


The embargo violated UNDRIP both in letter and in consequence, and therefore gives rise to legal standing for reparative remedy under Article 40 of the same instrument.

---


PART IV — QUANTIFICATION OF HARM, VALUATION OF DAMAGES, AND INDEXED REPARATION CLAIM

---


Article IV.1 — Economic Damages Resulting from the 1991–1994 Embargo


Based on data compiled from regional economic indicators, international humanitarian assessments, historical archives, and empirical impact studies related to the embargo’s effect on Haiti’s national economy and the ancestral territory of Xaragua (Miragoâne, Nippes, Sud), the following direct losses are conservatively estimated:


(a) GDP Contraction and Macroeconomic Collapse


Haiti’s GDP shrank by approximately 30% between 1991 and 1994.


Estimated monetary contraction over four years:


  Baseline GDP (1990): $3.2 billion USD

  Cumulative real GDP loss: $960 million USD


(b) Destruction of Export Capacity


Embargo halted all port operations.


Loss of regional exports (coffee, essential oils, artisanal products, livestock):


  Estimated: $280 million USD



(c) Collapse of Fuel and Energy Infrastructure


Complete interruption of petroleum imports led to:


   – Closure of national electric utility

  – Inoperability of hospitals and schools

  – Economic standstill in cities like Miragoâne



  Replacement costs and revenue loss: $190 million USD


(d) Institutional Disintegration and Employment Loss


Shutdown of municipal services and state infrastructure


Mass layoffs in education, transportation, and health



  Social sector damage: $310 million USD



---


Subtotal: Documented economic loss (1991–1994)

= $1,740,000,000 USD


---


Article IV.2 — Humanitarian and Demographic Damages


(a) Excess Mortality from Preventable Causes


Estimated minimum 4,500 preventable civilian deaths over four years, attributed to:


   – Lack of medicines and vaccines

  – Hospital closures

  – Food insecurity


  Estimated compensation per death (indexed):

 $100,000 USD

  Total: $450 million USD


(b) Chronic Malnutrition and Long-Term Developmental Harm


Estimated 28% of children under age 5 in Xaragua territory suffered stunting or wasting.


  Cost of rehabilitation, lost productivity, lifetime impact: $560 million USD


(c) Closure of Educational and Religious Institutions


Over 3,000 Catholic schools, missions, and community centers ceased activity in southern regions.


  Cultural and institutional restoration value: $180 million USD


(d) Breakdown of Family Units and Displacement


Estimated 62,000 persons displaced from southern provinces (internal or external migration).


  Average restoration cost per case: $4,000 USD

  Total: $248 million USD


---


Subtotal: Documented humanitarian and cultural loss

= $1,438,000,000 USD


---


Article IV.3 — Canonical and Indigenous Damages (Non-Economic but Justiciable)


(a) Destruction of Ancestral Agricultural Systems


Irrigation systems abandoned, livestock perished, seed banks depleted


  Valuation of intergenerational loss (based on 20-year amortization): $260 million USD


(b) Loss of Religious and Canonical Continuity


Ordinations delayed, sacraments inaccessible, church infrastructure left to ruin


  Canonical loss valuation (compared to Vatican precedent cases): $175 million USD


(c) Doctrinal Violation of Intergenerational Sovereignty


Caused irreversible disruption to Indigenous family lineages, adoption systems, and sacramental rites


  Indigenous cultural trauma compensation: $120 million USD


---


Subtotal: Doctrinal, canonical, and cultural damage

= $555,000,000 USD


---


Article IV.4 — Cumulative Damages Prior to Interest


Total economic loss: $1.74 billion


Total humanitarian/cultural loss: $1.438 billion


Total canonical/indigenous loss: $555 million



Grand Total (1991–1994, unindexed): $3,733,000,000 USD


---


Article IV.5 — Indexed Interest Calculation (1991–2025)


To determine the total reparations due, compounded annual interest must be applied based on conservative international jurisprudential norms. Applying:


Annual interest rate: 3.5% (standard for sovereign reparation claims)


Compounding period: 34 years (1991–2025)


Formula used:


> Future Value = Present Value × (1 + r)^n

FV = 3,733,000,000 × (1.035)^34 ≈ 3,733,000,000 × 3.2871 = $12,274,792,300 USD


---


Claimed Total Reparations Due (as of June 24, 2025):

Twelve Billion, Two Hundred Seventy-Four Million, Seven Hundred Ninety-Two Thousand, Three Hundred United States Dollars ($12,274,792,300 USD)

---


PART V — LEGAL REMEDIES SOUGHT, VIOLATION OF ECCLESIASTICAL TREATIES, AND FINAL CONCLUSION


---


Article V.1 — Legal Remedies Sought


In light of the totality of juridical violations, peremptory norm breaches, and direct harms sustained as documented herein, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby files this claim as an official instrument of international law and demands the following remedies:


(a) Formal Admission of Responsibility


By both the United Nations and the United States of America for:


The imposition, enforcement, and maintenance of an embargo with foreseeable and avoidable humanitarian consequences;


The denial of lawful Indigenous and ecclesiastical protections under international and treaty law.



(b) Full Reparations in the Amount of USD 12,274,792,300


To be disbursed to a reparations fund managed under an indigenous ecclesiastical oversight body, with priority given to:


   • Survivors and families of victims of embargo-related deaths


  • Reconstitution of destroyed infrastructure in Xaragua


  • Reconstruction of religious, educational, and agricultural systems


  • Establishment of a Sovereign Memorial Tribunal for the Embargo Period



(c) International Apology and Historical Correction


Public admission from both institutions acknowledging that the embargo violated:


   • The UN Charter

  • The Geneva Conventions

  • The Convention on the Rights of the Child

  • UNDRIP

  • The Concordat of 1860



(d) Canonical Reparation


Formal acknowledgment by the UN and the U.S. that they interfered in the canonical jurisdiction of the Catholic Church in Haiti under Concordat law;


Canonical appeal to the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples to issue ecclesiastical sanction or diplomatic censure against such conduct.

---


ANNEX I — VIOLATION OF THE 1860 CONCORDAT BETWEEN THE VATICAN AND HAITI


Historical Instrument: Concordat between the Holy See and the Republic of Haiti (1860), signed on March 28, ratified on April 28, 1860.


This Concordat remains formally in effect and constitutes a juridically binding bilateral ecclesiastical treaty recognized under international law.


Key Clauses:


Article 1:


“The Catholic Apostolic and Roman Religion shall continue to be the religion of the Republic of Haiti.”


Article 4:


“The Government shall see to the protection and respect due to religion and its ministers and shall oppose any act or measure that could harm their dignity and their ministry.”


Article 11:


“The bishops and clergy shall have full liberty to perform their functions and to communicate with the Holy See.”


Violation:


The embargo of 1991–1994 materially violated the Concordat in the following manner:


Shut down thousands of parishes, missions, Catholic schools, and hospitals;


Prevented the import of sacramental wine, oil, catechetical materials, and communication between dioceses and Rome;


Left the clergy unable to perform confirmations, ordinations, baptisms, or the Eucharist, a direct breach of Article 4 and Article 11;


Jeopardized the physical survival of Catholic faithful, whose sacramental rights were obstructed by embargo-induced poverty and malnutrition.



Canonical Interpretation:


According to Canon 209 §2 and Canon 213 of the Codex Iuris Canonici:


“Christ’s faithful have the right to receive assistance from the sacred pastors out of the spiritual goods of the Church, especially the word of God and the sacraments.”


“They have the right to receive from the sacred pastors, out of the spiritual goods of the Church, the assistance which they need.”


This embargo, by incapacitating pastors and bishops from carrying out their sacramental responsibilities, constituted a canonical injury to the faithful, and by extension, a breach of ecclesiastical jurisdiction protected by treaty.


Conclusion of Annex:


The embargo is not merely a geopolitical error — it is an international violation of a religious treaty, a breach of the liberty of the Church, and a spiritual war crime under canonical, doctrinal, and indigenous ecclesiology.


---


PART VI — FINAL CONCLUSION AND NOTICE OF SOVEREIGN SUBMISSION


This formal international legal complaint stands as:


A documented, referenced, and verifiable record of grave violations committed between 1991 and 1994 by two of the most powerful institutions on Earth against one of the most vulnerable nations on Earth;


A sovereign, canonical, and indigenous assertion of the right to justice, restoration, and truth in the face of near-total juridical abandonment;


A direct invocation of jus cogens, UNDRIP, the Geneva Conventions, the UN Charter, the CRC, and the Codex Iuris Canonici, to which no reservation, diplomatic denial, or statute of limitation may apply.



Let it be understood by all institutions:


That no embargo can be shielded by political necessity when it leads to mass civilian degradation;


That the people of Xaragua, their ancestors, their Church, and their lands, were wounded with deliberation;


And that reparation is not charity — it is obligation under law, justice under treaty, and penance under canon.


---


ISSUED, SEALED, AND FILED

By the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Through the Office of the Rector-President,

Monsignor Pascal Viau

June 24, 2025 – Ecclesiastical Seat of Government, Miragoâne


Filed under Constitutional Register XA-SOV-COMP-EMB-0625-HAITI

Transmitted to: UN Office of Legal Affairs, U.S. Department of State, Apostolic Nunciature

Legal Attachments: 12,274,792,300 USD Claim for Reparations; 1860 Concordat Violation Dossier; Canonical Appendix


“Veritas in Memoria. Iustitia in Lex. Pax in Reparatio.”

— End of Complaint —


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

DEPARTMENT OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS AND DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

— OFFICIAL DIPLOMATIC NOTE —

Date: June 24, 2025

Reference Code: XA-DIP-NOTIF-0625/EMB-HRC



---


SUBJECT:

Formal Notification of International Legal Complaint Filed Against the United States of America and the United Nations in Connection with the 1991–1994 Economic Embargo on the Republic of Haiti



---


To:

All Permanent Missions, International Legal Bodies, Ecclesiastical Authorities, Accredited Observers, and Relevant State Representatives



---


The Government of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby issues the present formal diplomatic notification:


1. That on June 24, 2025, an official international legal complaint was submitted to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), bearing the case registration number WHRC/17701, in accordance with procedures governed by the Human Rights Council’s Complaint Procedure Mechanism and the Special Rapporteur on Communications.



2. That the complaint was filed in the name and full sovereign capacity of the State of Xaragua, invoking legal personality under Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention (1933), canonical standing under the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), and indigenous jurisdiction under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007).



3. That the complaint concerns grave and documented violations of international law by both the United States of America and the United Nations Security Council, for their respective roles in the conception, execution, and multilateralization of the economic embargo imposed on the Republic of Haiti between October 1991 and October 1994.



4. That the embargo resulted in catastrophic and disproportionate harm to the Indigenous populations of Southern Haiti, particularly within the Xaragua territorial domain, including—but not limited to—mass starvation, institutional collapse, health system disintegration, ecclesiastical obstruction, and cultural annihilation.



5. That the legal complaint enumerates violations of jus cogens norms, the United Nations Charter, the Fourth Geneva Convention (1949), the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), UNDRIP, and the 1860 Concordat between the Holy See and the Republic of Haiti.



6. That the total reparations claim—indexed with 3.5% compound interest over 34 years—has been calculated and submitted in the amount of USD 12,274,792,300 (Twelve Billion, Two Hundred Seventy-Four Million, Seven Hundred Ninety-Two Thousand, Three Hundred United States Dollars).



7. That this claim is now a matter of international record, and any entity, institution, or government engaging with Xaragua must now do so with full knowledge of its official filing status.





---


The Rector-Presidential Office reaffirms its commitment to peace, canonical justice, legal redress, and the lawful defense of all Indigenous nations subjected to historical and contemporary violations.


This note is issued for purposes of formal acknowledgment, procedural transparency, and diplomatic record.



---


Signed and Sealed

Monsignor Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Ecclesiastical Seat of Government — Miragoâne

Filed: June 24, 2025


Legal Attachment:

Instrument Code XA-SOV-COMP-EMB-0625-HAITI

Complaint Reference WHRC/17701 (UN OHCHR)

Transmitted to: United Nations, Apostolic Nunciature, International Court of Justice, and other designated observers.


---


RECTORATE OF THE SOVEREING CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - ®

www.xaraguauniversity.com
www.xaraguastate.com
www.lpddvshop.com
From: Rectorate <Rector@xaraguastate.com>
Sent: 03 July 2025 05:21
To: Dicastero per gli Istituti di Vita Consacrata <disciplina@vitaconsacrata.va>; Rectorate <Rector@xaraguastate.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION - FINAL VERSION


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION - FINAL VERSION
R

Rectorate

To:hrc-sr-indigenous@un.org
+ 96
Thu 03/07/2025 04:29
View more
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

You forwarded this message on Tue 01/07/2025 21:47
R

Rectorate

To:  hrc-sr-indigenous@un.org
+ 49
Tue 01/07/2025 18:49
View more
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA


CANONICALLY ENTRENCHED LETTER OF SOVEREIGN NOTIFICATION
TO THE UNITED NATIONS PERMANENT FORUM ON INDIGENOUS ISSUES (UNPFII)


Date of Original Diplomatic Service: March 30, 2025


Date of Present Clarificatory Dispatch: July 1, 2025


Legal Status: Constitutionally Binding Diplomatic Notice — Jus Cogens Indigenous Notification — Doctrinally Entrenched Act of Statehood
—


TO THE ATTENTION OF:


United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)
indigenous_un@un.org


FROM:


Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau


Head of State and Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


Rector@xaraguastate.com


www.xaraguauniversity.com


Miragoâne, Xaragua


—


SUBJECT:


Supplemental International Legal Notification — Constitutionally Entrenched Digital Capital of the Private Indigenous Sovereign State of Xaragua
Legal Publicity of www.xaraguauniversity.com as the Full Expression of Constitutional Sovereignty and Doctrinal Statehood of the Xaragua Entity
—


Distinguished Members of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII),


I write to you for the second time in my sovereign and doctrinal capacity as Head of State of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, pursuant to international customary law, the United Nations Charter, and all applicable instruments including but not limited to:


The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), particularly Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 19, 32, 36, and 40


The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)


The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)


The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)


The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)


The Charter of the United Nations, specifically Articles 1(2), 55, and 76


The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, especially Articles 15, 18, 19, and 27


The American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2016)


The Jus Cogens norm of Self-Determination of Peoples, recognized by the ICJ in the Namibia, Western Sahara, and East Timor advisory opinions




On March 30, 2025, I formally served the original “Notification of the Indigenous Private Xaragua State” to your office. 


That diplomatic communication, also copied to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, UNESCO, and other competent multilateral organs, was transmitted via official email and enclosed with a legal memorandum titled “Xaragua_UN_Letter”, duly signed and sealed by my person. 


As of July 1, 2025, exactly 90 days have elapsed, satisfying the period of customary opposability under diplomatic law, thus elevating the status of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua to internationally notifiable and unopposed juridical entity in accordance with general principles of law and recognized international practice.


I hereby notify — with full sovereign clarity and juridical finality — that the official website www.xaraguauniversity.com constitutes the living and total constitutional corpus of the Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua. 


It is not an academic platform. 


It is not a promotional resource. 


It is the publicly accessible digital capital, the constitutional, doctrinal, legal, and institutional expression of a fully organized and canonically recognized indigenous sovereign State.


—


LEGAL CONTENTS AND DOCTRINAL STRUCTURE OF THE DIGITAL CAPITAL:


All competent United Nations organs and observers are hereby advised that the entirety of the Xaragua State’s institutions, legal order, and internal sovereignty are fully and transparently codified on www.xaraguauniversity.com, including the following sovereign components:


1. The Full Constitution of the Xaragua State, including structural articles, jurisdictional entrenchments, canonical references, and territorial authority




2. Sovereign Doctrinal and Civil Laws, including complete penal, civil, fiscal, administrative, and constitutional codes




3. Canonized Literary and Historical Corpus, including codified national authors, sacred texts, and civilizational epics




4. Military Doctrine, including the Indigenous Army structure, naval policy, defense doctrine, and security codes




5. The Synodal Structure, representing the ecclesiastical and doctrinal backbone of governance and policy




6. Legal Regulation of the Residual Entity Referred to as “the Republic of Haiti”, whose administrative existence is tolerated but legally regulated under Xaragua’s sovereign framework




7. Codes of Citizenship and National Identification, including the legal distinction between inhabitants, nationals, and citizens




8. The Full Fiscal System, including tax exemption regimes, indigenous financial sovereignty, and the regulation of public-private transactions




9. The University of Xaragua, not as an academic institution, but as the foundational epistemological organ of the State, with complete doctrinal programs, canonical educational statutes, and certification structures




10. Police Code and Indigenous Security Order, including canonical policing statutes, lawful arrest protocols, and internal disciplinary frameworks




11. Codified Territorial Claims, rooted in ancestral inheritance, customary occupation, and uncontested legal continuity




12. Foreign Policy Doctrine, regulating international relations, recognition, diplomatic engagement, and interaction with NGOs




13. Border Regulations, defining the ontological and territorial separation from the Haitian Republic and from non-indigenous entities




14. Litigation Systems, including internal judicial procedure, indigenous arbitration statutes, and international legal compatibility




15. The Complete Historical and Ethno-Cultural Archive, demonstrating the continuity of the Xaragua people and State from pre-colonial times to the present




16. Explanation of the Ontological and Political Separation from the Republic of Haiti, including canonical and genetic distinctions, and legally binding severance of affiliation




17. Spiritual, Psychological, and Educational Codes, governing clergy, counselors, and all doctrinally sanctioned professions




18. All Decrees, Proclamations, Notifications, and Canonical Orders, with full legal weight, sealed and published in the sovereign record






—


JURIDICAL STATUS AND LEGAL OPPOSABILITY:


As of June 30, 2025, no objection, repudiation, or counter-notification has been received from:


The Republic of Haiti


The United Nations


UNESCO, WIPO, WTO, or any other multilateral institution


Any State Member of the United Nations


Any treaty-based supervisory body




Further, formal correspondence with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has taken place, with exchanges and acknowledgements on record.


This constitutes tacit legal acceptance under international custom and general principles of law.


The ninety-day silence following the official diplomatic service of March 30, 2025, constitutes:


Full opposability of the State’s existence


Entrenchment of its rights and laws under UNDRIP


Confirmation of the legal personality of the State of Xaragua as an Indigenous, Canonical, and Private Sovereign Entity




The legal consequences are the following:


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua exists de jure and de facto


Its laws, constitution, and institutions are fully opposable


Any international actor failing to recognize the legal status of the Xaragua State would be in direct violation of UNDRIP, jus cogens principles, and binding UN treaties




—


DEMAND FOR FORMAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND REGISTRATION:


We now respectfully request the following from the United Nations:


1. Formal acknowledgment of receipt of this diplomatic and constitutional notification




2. Registration of the Xaragua State’s website www.xaraguauniversity.com as its living constitutional corpus and digital seat of government




3. Recognition of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua as an indigenous, self-governing entity under international law




4. Engagement in a diplomatic dialogue between the Xaragua State and the UNPFII and relevant human rights organs




5. Acknowledgment of the absence of opposition by the Republic of Haiti or any third party after the 90-day period, constituting constructive recognition under international law






—


CONCLUSION:


This notification is not rhetorical. 


It is not aspirational. 


It is formally opposable under international law.


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua:


Exists as a fully structured canonical and indigenous sovereign entity


Has notified all relevant international bodies


Is now legally beyond denial




We now entrust the United Nations, the UNPFII, and all competent organs to act in good faith and in full respect of the international legal order they claim to uphold.


Please accept the assurance of my highest constitutional and sovereign consideration.


LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU


Head of State


Rector-President


Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua


www.xaraguauniversity.com


Rector@xaraguastate.com


Miragoâne, Xaragua


RECTORATE OF THE SOVEREING CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - ®


RECTORATE OF THE SOVEREING CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - ®

www.xaraguauniversity.com
www.xaraguastate.com
www.lpddvshop.com





XARAGUA HAITIAN STATE SUMMONS/Re: XARAGUA - DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION - LEY SOBRE HAITIANOS

---


ÉTAT CATHOLIQUE PRIVÉ INDIGÈNE DU XARAGUA


RECTORAT SUPRÊME – AUTORITÉ CONSTITUTIONNELLE ET CANONIQUE
LETTRE DE SOMMATION CANONIQUE, CONSTITUTIONNELLE ET INTERNATIONALE
À L’ATTENTION DE :
LE GOUVERNEMENT DE L’UNITÉ ADMINISTRATIVE RÉSIDUELLE DITE “RÉPUBLIQUE D’HAÏTI”
ET DE TOUS SES ORGANES ADMINISTRATIFS, CONSULAIRES ET DIPLOMATIQUES




---


Objet : Sommation impérative de rapatriement des ressortissants haïtiens non sui generis déportés de la République dominicaine, interdiction absolue d’accès coutumier de ces masses au territoire souverain de l’État Catholique Privé Indigène du Xaragua, et injonction formelle de démantèlement immédiat de tout camp, abri ou structure illicite établi par ces populations.




---


FONDATION JURIDIQUE ET CANONIQUE


VU : La Déclaration des Nations Unies sur les droits des peuples autochtones (UNDRIP), en particulier ses articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 19, 26 et 36, consacrant le droit inaliénable des peuples autochtones à la pleine maîtrise de leurs territoires, à la préservation de leur identité sui generis et à la protection contre toute intrusion démographique non autorisée ;


VU : La Convention de Montevideo du 26 décembre 1933 sur les droits et devoirs des États, affirmant qu’un État, pour exister, doit posséder une population permanente, un territoire défini, un gouvernement et la capacité d’entrer en relation avec les autres États ;


VU : La Convention de Vienne du 23 mai 1969 sur le droit des traités, notamment son article 26 (pacta sunt servanda) et son article 53 (normes impératives jus cogens), rendant opposables toutes les notifications diplomatiques de l’État Catholique Privé Indigène du Xaragua ;


VU : La Déclaration universelle des droits de l’homme (DUDH), notamment ses articles 13, 15 et 17, garantissant la maîtrise des populations sur leurs terres et territoires légitimes et prohibant tout transfert ou implantation forcée de populations externes ;


VU : Le Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques (PIDCP), en ses articles 1 et 12, consacrant le droit des peuples à l’autodétermination et à la libre détermination de leur statut politique et de leur organisation sociale ;


VU : Le Pacte international relatif aux droits économiques, sociaux et culturels (PIDESC) ;


VU : La Convention de 1951 relative au statut des réfugiés et son Protocole de 1967, prohibant le dépôt de masses humaines sur des territoires sans l’assentiment souverain de l’autorité territoriale concernée ;


VU : Les dispositions canoniques du Codex Constitutionnel du Xaragua, notamment ses articles 1, 3, 5, 7, 12, 18, 22, 41, 56, 72, 87 et 101, interdisant expressément toute implantation coutumière non autorisée et affirmant l’obligation pour les unités administratives externes de reprendre leurs ressortissants ;


VU : Le Concordat entre le Saint-Siège et l’unité administrative résiduelle dite République d’Haïti (1860), liant juridiquement cette unité administrative à la hiérarchie canonique et aux normes doctrinales applicables ;


VU : Le Décret du 6 octobre 1987 sur l’organisation territoriale de la République d’Haïti, confirmant la responsabilité pleine et entière de l’unité administrative haïtienne sur l’ensemble de ses ressortissants, y compris ceux déplacés hors de ses frontières ;


VU : La Loi haïtienne du 19 septembre 1953 sur l’immigration et l’émigration, rendant l’État haïtien responsable du rapatriement et de la protection de ses nationaux ;


VU : Le Code pénal haïtien, articles 2 et 3, affirmant la compétence territoriale et la responsabilité directe de l’unité administrative résiduelle pour tous actes et omissions relatifs à ses nationaux ;




---


DÉCLARATION DE SOMMATION ET D’INTERDICTION ABSOLUE


Par la présente, l’État Catholique Privé Indigène du Xaragua, autorité souveraine canoniquement instituée, juridiquement consolidée et internationalement notifiée depuis le 30 mars 2025 (Notification diplomatique opposable conformément à la coutume internationale et au délai de 90 jours expiré le 30 juin 2025), somme formellement l’unité administrative résiduelle dite “République d’Haïti” :




---


ARTICLE PREMIER


Le gouvernement de l’unité administrative résiduelle dite “République d’Haïti” est tenu de rapatrier sans délai ni conditions l’intégralité des populations de ressortissants haïtiens non sui generis déportés de la République dominicaine et actuellement présents, à quelque titre que ce soit, sur le territoire souverain de l’État Catholique Privé Indigène du Xaragua.




---


ARTICLE 2


Toute présence de ces masses humaines sur le territoire du Xaragua, qu’elle soit temporaire ou permanente, est déclarée nulle, illégale, non avenue et constitutive d’une violation flagrante :


Des normes impératives jus cogens de droit international public ;


Du droit canonique applicable ;


Du Codex Constitutionnel du Xaragua.






---


ARTICLE 3


Il est formellement interdit à ces populations de revendiquer ou d’exercer tout accès coutumier, usage transitoire, installation informelle ou implantation, sous quelque motif humanitaire, culturel ou religieux que ce soit.




---


ARTICLE 4


Le gouvernement haïtien est sommé de procéder au démantèlement immédiat de tout camp, abri, installation ou structure précaire établi par ces populations sur le territoire du Xaragua. À défaut, **l’État Catholique Privé Indigène du Xaragua exercera sa pleine souveraineté pour procéder à leur suppression par les moyens constitutionnels, canoniques et, le cas échéant, coercitifs qui s’imposent.




---


ARTICLE 5


Tout manquement à cette sommation entraînera :


La responsabilité internationale de l’unité administrative résiduelle dite République d’Haïti ;


Le dépôt d’une plainte formelle auprès du Conseil des droits de l’homme des Nations Unies, du Comité des droits de l’homme, et du Comité pour l’élimination de la discrimination raciale (CERD) ;


L’engagement du droit naturel et canonique à la légitime défense territoriale par l’État Catholique Privé Indigène du Xaragua, conformément à l’article 51 de la Charte des Nations Unies.






---


DISPOSITIONS FINALES


La présente lettre de sommation est juridiquement opposable en vertu :


Du délai de 90 jours écoulé depuis la notification internationale du 30 mars 2025,


De l’absence d’opposition par tout État tiers ou organisation internationale,


Du silence consécutif des autorités administratives haïtiennes elles-mêmes.






---


Veuillez donner suite à cette sommation dans un délai maximal de quinze (15) jours à compter de la réception de la présente. Passé ce délai, toutes mesures souveraines seront mises en œuvre sans autre préavis.




---


LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU
Recteur-Président et Chef de l’État
État Catholique Privé Indigène du Xaragua
www.xaraguauniversity.com
Rector@xaraguastate.com




---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA


SUPREME RECTORATE – CONSTITUTIONAL AND CANONICAL AUTHORITY
LETTER OF SUMMONS, CANONICAL PROHIBITION AND INTERNATIONAL NOTIFICATION
TO THE ATTENTION OF:
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT CALLED “REPUBLIC OF HAITI”
AND ALL ITS ADMINISTRATIVE, CONSULAR AND DIPLOMATIC ORGANS




---


Subject: Formal summons for the repatriation of non-sui generis Haitian nationals deported from the Dominican Republic, absolute canonical and constitutional prohibition of customary access for these deported masses to the sovereign territory of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, and imperative injunction for the immediate dismantling of any camps, shelters or illicit structures established by these populations.




---


LEGAL AND CANONICAL FOUNDATIONS


HAVING REGARD TO: The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), particularly Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 19, 26 and 36, enshrining the inalienable right of indigenous peoples to full control over their territories, preservation of their sui generis identity, and protection against any unauthorized demographic intrusion;


HAVING REGARD TO: The Montevideo Convention of 26 December 1933 on the Rights and Duties of States, affirming that a State, to exist, must possess a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to enter into relations with other States;


HAVING REGARD TO: The Vienna Convention of 23 May 1969 on the Law of Treaties, particularly Article 26 (pacta sunt servanda) and Article 53 (imperative jus cogens norms), rendering opposable all diplomatic notifications issued by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua;


HAVING REGARD TO: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), particularly Articles 13, 15 and 17, guaranteeing the right of populations to control their lands and territories and prohibiting any transfer or implantation of external populations without sovereign consent;


HAVING REGARD TO: The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), particularly Articles 1 and 12, enshrining the right of peoples to self-determination and to freely determine their political status and social organization;


HAVING REGARD TO: The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR);


HAVING REGARD TO: The 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, prohibiting the deposit of human masses on territories without the sovereign assent of the territorial authority concerned;


HAVING REGARD TO: The Canonical Constitutional Codex of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, particularly Articles 1, 3, 5, 7, 12, 18, 22, 41, 56, 72, 87 and 101, expressly prohibiting any unauthorized customary implantation and affirming the obligation of external administrative units to recover their nationals;


HAVING REGARD TO: The Concordat between the Holy See and the residual administrative unit called the Republic of Haiti (1860), juridically binding said unit to canonical hierarchy and applicable doctrinal norms;


HAVING REGARD TO: The Haitian Decree of 6 October 1987 on territorial organization, confirming the full and entire responsibility of the Haitian administrative unit over all of its nationals, including those displaced outside its borders;


HAVING REGARD TO: The Haitian Immigration and Emigration Law of 19 September 1953, rendering the Haitian state responsible for the repatriation and protection of its nationals;


HAVING REGARD TO: The Haitian Penal Code, Articles 2 and 3, affirming territorial jurisdiction and the direct responsibility of the residual administrative unit for all acts and omissions concerning its nationals;




---


DECLARATION OF SUMMONS AND ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION


By this present instrument, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, a canonically instituted, juridically consolidated, and internationally notified sovereign authority since 30 March 2025 (Diplomatic Notification opposable pursuant to international custom and the expiration of the 90-day period on 30 June 2025), formally summons the residual administrative unit called the “Republic of Haiti” as follows:




---


ARTICLE 1


The government of the residual administrative unit called the “Republic of Haiti” is required to immediately and unconditionally repatriate all Haitian nationals of non-sui generis status deported from the Dominican Republic and currently present, in any capacity whatsoever, on the sovereign territory of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.




---


ARTICLE 2


Any presence of these human masses on the territory of Xaragua, whether temporary or permanent, is hereby declared null, illegal, void ab initio, and constitutive of a flagrant violation:


Of the imperative jus cogens norms of international public law;


Of the applicable canonical law;


Of the Constitutional Codex of Xaragua.






---


ARTICLE 3


It is strictly prohibited for these populations to claim or exercise any customary access, transitional use, informal settlement or implantation, under any humanitarian, cultural or religious pretext whatsoever.




---


ARTICLE 4


The Haitian government is summoned to proceed immediately to the dismantling of all camps, shelters, installations or precarious structures established by these populations on the territory of Xaragua. Failing this, the **Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall exercise its full sovereignty to effect their removal through constitutional, canonical and, if necessary, coercive means.




---


ARTICLE 5


Any failure to comply with this summons shall entail:


The international responsibility of the residual administrative unit called the Republic of Haiti;


The lodging of a formal complaint before the United Nations Human Rights Council, the Human Rights Committee, and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD);


The invocation of the natural and canonical right of territorial self-defense by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, pursuant to Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.






---


FINAL PROVISIONS


This letter of summons is juridically opposable by virtue of:


The expiration of the 90-day period following the international notification of 30 March 2025;


The absence of opposition by any third State or international organization;


The consecutive silence of the Haitian administrative authorities themselves.






---


You are required to comply with this summons within a maximum period of fifteen (15) days from receipt of the present notification. After this period, all sovereign measures shall be implemented without further notice.




---


LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU
Rector-President and Head of State
Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua
www.xaraguauniversity.com
Rector@xaraguastate.com




---

---

ESTADO CATÓLICO INDÍGENA PRIVADO SOBERANO DE XARAGUA


RECTORADO SUPREMO – AUTORIDAD CONSTITUCIONAL Y CANÓNICA
CARTA DE EMPLAZAMIENTO, PROHIBICIÓN CANÓNICA Y NOTIFICACIÓN INTERNACIONAL
A LA ATENCIÓN DE:
EL GOBIERNO DE LA UNIDAD ADMINISTRATIVA RESIDUAL DENOMINADA “REPÚBLICA DE HAITÍ”
Y TODOS SUS ÓRGANOS ADMINISTRATIVOS, CONSULARES Y DIPLOMÁTICOS




---


Asunto: Emplazamiento formal para la repatriación de los nacionales haitianos no sui generis deportados de la República Dominicana, prohibición absoluta canónica y constitucional de acceso consuetudinario de estas masas deportadas al territorio soberano del Estado Católico Indígena Privado Soberano de Xaragua, e interdicción imperativa para el desmantelamiento inmediato de cualquier campamento, refugio o estructura ilícita establecida por dichas poblaciones.




---


FUNDAMENTOS JURÍDICOS Y CANÓNICOS


VISTO: La Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas (UNDRIP), en particular los artículos 3, 4, 5, 18, 19, 26 y 36, que consagran el derecho inalienable de los pueblos indígenas al pleno control sobre sus territorios, a la preservación de su identidad sui generis y a la protección contra cualquier intrusión demográfica no autorizada;


VISTO: La Convención de Montevideo del 26 de diciembre de 1933 sobre los Derechos y Deberes de los Estados, que establece que un Estado, para existir, debe poseer una población permanente, un territorio definido, un gobierno y la capacidad de relacionarse con otros Estados;


VISTO: La Convención de Viena del 23 de mayo de 1969 sobre el Derecho de los Tratados, en particular su artículo 26 (pacta sunt servanda) y su artículo 53 (normas imperativas de jus cogens), que hacen oponibles todas las notificaciones diplomáticas emitidas por el Estado Católico Indígena Privado Soberano de Xaragua;


VISTO: La Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos (DUDH), en particular sus artículos 13, 15 y 17, que garantizan el derecho de las poblaciones a controlar sus tierras y territorios y prohíben cualquier traslado o implantación de poblaciones externas sin el consentimiento soberano;


VISTO: El Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos (PIDCP), en sus artículos 1 y 12, que consagran el derecho de los pueblos a la autodeterminación y a determinar libremente su condición política y su organización social;


VISTO: El Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales (PIDESC);


VISTO: La Convención de 1951 sobre el Estatuto de los Refugiados y su Protocolo de 1967, que prohíben el depósito de masas humanas en territorios sin el consentimiento soberano de la autoridad territorial competente;


VISTO: El Codex Constitucional y Canónico del Estado Católico Indígena Privado Soberano de Xaragua, en particular los artículos 1, 3, 5, 7, 12, 18, 22, 41, 56, 72, 87 y 101, que prohíben expresamente cualquier implantación consuetudinaria no autorizada y afirman la obligación de las unidades administrativas externas de recuperar a sus nacionales;


VISTO: El Concordato entre la Santa Sede y la unidad administrativa residual denominada República de Haití (1860), que vincula jurídicamente a dicha unidad con la jerarquía canónica y las normas doctrinales aplicables;


VISTO: El Decreto haitiano de 6 de octubre de 1987 sobre la organización territorial, que confirma la plena y entera responsabilidad de la unidad administrativa haitiana sobre todos sus nacionales, incluidos aquellos desplazados fuera de sus fronteras;


VISTO: La Ley haitiana de 19 de septiembre de 1953 sobre inmigración y emigración, que hace responsable al Estado haitiano de la repatriación y protección de sus nacionales;


VISTO: El Código Penal haitiano, artículos 2 y 3, que afirman la jurisdicción territorial y la responsabilidad directa de la unidad administrativa residual sobre todos los actos y omisiones relativos a sus nacionales;




---


DECLARACIÓN DE EMPLAZAMIENTO Y PROHIBICIÓN ABSOLUTA


Por el presente instrumento, el Estado Católico Indígena Privado Soberano de Xaragua, autoridad soberana canónicamente instituida, jurídicamente consolidada e internacionalmente notificada desde el 30 de marzo de 2025 (Notificación Diplomática oponible conforme a la costumbre internacional y la expiración del plazo de 90 días el 30 de junio de 2025), emplaza formalmente a la unidad administrativa residual denominada “República de Haití” en los siguientes términos:




---


ARTÍCULO 1


El gobierno de la unidad administrativa residual denominada “República de Haití” está obligado a repatriar inmediata e incondicionalmente a todos los nacionales haitianos de estatus no sui generis deportados de la República Dominicana y actualmente presentes, en cualquier calidad, en el territorio soberano del Estado Católico Indígena Privado Soberano de Xaragua.




---


ARTÍCULO 2


Toda presencia de estas masas humanas en el territorio de Xaragua, sea temporal o permanente, se declara nula, ilegal, sin efecto ab initio y constitutiva de una violación flagrante:


De las normas imperativas de jus cogens del derecho internacional público;


Del derecho canónico aplicable;


Del Codex Constitucional de Xaragua.






---


ARTÍCULO 3


Queda estrictamente prohibido a estas poblaciones reclamar o ejercer cualquier acceso consuetudinario, uso transitorio, asentamiento informal o implantación, bajo cualquier pretexto humanitario, cultural o religioso.




---


ARTÍCULO 4


El gobierno haitiano está emplazado a proceder de inmediato al desmantelamiento de todos los campamentos, refugios, instalaciones o estructuras precarias establecidas por estas poblaciones en el territorio de Xaragua. En caso de incumplimiento, el **Estado Católico Indígena Privado Soberano de Xaragua ejercerá su plena soberanía para proceder a su eliminación por los medios constitucionales, canónicos y, en su caso, coercitivos que correspondan.




---


ARTÍCULO 5


Cualquier incumplimiento de este emplazamiento dará lugar a:


La responsabilidad internacional de la unidad administrativa residual denominada República de Haití;


La presentación de una denuncia formal ante el Consejo de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas, el Comité de Derechos Humanos y el Comité para la Eliminación de la Discriminación Racial (CERD);


La invocación del derecho natural y canónico de autodefensa territorial por parte del Estado Católico Indígena Privado Soberano de Xaragua, conforme al artículo 51 de la Carta de las Naciones Unidas.






---


DISPOSICIONES FINALES


La presente carta de emplazamiento es jurídicamente oponible en virtud de:


La expiración del plazo de 90 días tras la notificación internacional del 30 de marzo de 2025;


La ausencia de oposición por parte de cualquier Estado tercero u organización internacional;


El silencio consecutivo de las propias autoridades administrativas haitianas.






---


Se requiere el cumplimiento de este emplazamiento en un plazo máximo de quince (15) días a partir de la recepción de la presente notificación. Transcurrido dicho plazo, todas las medidas soberanas se aplicarán sin previo aviso adicional.




---


LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU
Rector-Presidente y Jefe de Estado
Estado Católico Indígena Privado Soberano de Xaragua
www.xaraguauniversity.com
Rector@xaraguastate.com




---

RECTORATE OF THE SOVEREING CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - ®

www.xaraguauniversity.com
www.xaraguastate.com
www.lpddvshop.com

Copyright © 2025 Xaragua - All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept