Sovereign

---

---

SUPREME LEGAL ANALYSIS ON THE JURIDICAL VALIDITY AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

ISSUED UNDER THE SUPREME AUTHORITY OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 16, 2025

I. LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE CANONICAL STATE

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is established on juridical pillars that are recognized under international, canonical, and indigenous law. These foundations grant it absolute protection against taxation, customs duties, inspections, seizures, and external interference:

1. Canonical Legal Personality

The juridical framework of the Catholic Church, codified in the Codex Iuris Canonici, establishes the Church as a sovereign legal entity. Canonical institutions, when properly erected, enjoy extraterritorial privileges and immunities.

The Holy See itself, as recognized by the Lateran Treaty (1929), is a subject of international law despite its minimal territorial base. This principle extends to entities under its canonical umbrella.

2. Indigenous Sovereignty and Rights

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) affirms that indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination, control of their lands and resources, and freedom from taxation imposed by external states (Articles 3, 4, 26).

The ILO Convention 169 (1989) further codifies these rights, recognizing indigenous juridical systems and economic autonomy as binding obligations for ratifying states.

3. Customary International Law

Under jus cogens norms, the right of peoples to self-determination is non-derogable. This principle overrides any contrary domestic legislation and provides a universal shield against annexation or external impositions.

---

II. FISCAL AND CUSTOMS IMMUNITY

1. Absence of Taxation Powers over Canonical and Indigenous Entities

No external state possesses legal competence to levy taxes on a sovereign canonical entity or on an indigenous nation exercising its inherent sovereignty.

Taxation is a manifestation of sovereignty. Imposing it upon Xaragua would constitute an act of aggression and a breach of international law (ICJ Advisory Opinion, Namibia, 1971).

2. Prohibition of Customs Duties and Inspections

As an indigenous nation, Xaragua’s right to freely engage in commerce without external barriers is affirmed under UNDRIP Articles 20 and 36.

Canonical goods and properties have historically enjoyed immunity from customs duties (exemplified in various concordats between the Holy See and states).

3. Legal Sanctity of Dematerialized Assets

Digital infrastructures such as banks, universities, and platforms are protected under the principles of extraterritoriality and non-interference in cyberspace (Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations).

---

III. PROTECTION AGAINST SEIZURE, SEARCH, AND INTERVENTION

1. Canonical Immunity

As established in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), canonical and ecclesiastical properties enjoy inviolability. States cannot search, seize, or violate them without committing an international wrong.

2. Indigenous Rights of Non-Interference

Any attempt to interfere in Xaragua’s internal affairs would violate Article 8 of UNDRIP and Article 1(2) of the UN Charter, which prohibits acts undermining the political independence of peoples.

3. Supreme Juridical Shield of Xaragua

The integration of canonical, indigenous, and dematerialized legal frameworks creates a triple sovereignty barrier that is unprecedented and legally unassailable.

---

IV. CONCLUSION AND DECLARATION

By virtue of its canonical nature, indigenous status, and digital sovereignty, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua enjoys:

Complete tax immunity

Exemption from customs duties and inspections

Absolute protection against searches, seizures, and interventions

Recognition under international law as a self-determining subject

Any attempt by external entities to undermine this framework would constitute an act of international aggression, triggering responsibilities under the Articles on State Responsibility (ILC, 2001).

The State of Xaragua hereby affirms that its juridical foundation is legally entrenched, canonically ratified, and universally opposable.

ISSUED UNDER THE SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

---

---

ANNEX: SUPREME JURIDICAL DECLARATION ON THE UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY AND IRREVERSIBILITY OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

ISSUED UNDER THE SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

I. FOUNDATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND PRINCIPLES

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”) asserts its full juridical existence, sovereignty, and universal opposability on the basis of the following instruments:

1. Charter of the United Nations (1945)

Article 1(2): The right of peoples to self-determination.

Article 2(4): Prohibition of the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.

Article 55: Obligation of member states to respect equal rights and self-determination of peoples.

2. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)

Article 22: Inviolability of premises of the mission.

Article 30: Protection of private residences of diplomatic agents.

Article 41: Non-interference in internal affairs.

3. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)

Article 3: Indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination.

Article 4: Right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to internal and local affairs.

Article 26: Right to lands, territories, and resources traditionally owned or occupied.

Article 32: Right to determine priorities for the development or use of their lands and resources.

4. ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989)

Article 7(1): Indigenous peoples have the right to decide their own priorities for development.

Article 15: Rights of the peoples to the natural resources of their lands.

5. Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)

Canons 113-123: Recognition of juridical persons under Canon Law.

Canon 1256: The Church’s supreme ownership and administration of temporal goods.

Canons 1281-1288: Autonomy in the administration of ecclesiastical goods.

6. Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ILC, 2001)

Article 1: Attribution of wrongful acts to states.

Article 20-25: Circumstances precluding wrongfulness do not apply to violations of peremptory norms (jus cogens).

7. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

Article 17(2): No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of their property.

8. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)

Article II(c): Protection from deliberate infliction of conditions calculated to bring about physical destruction.

9. Customary International Law and Jus Cogens Norms

Principle of self-determination as affirmed in the ICJ Namibia Advisory Opinion (1971) and the ICJ Kosovo Advisory Opinion (2010).

Erga Omnes Obligations: All states are obliged to respect certain fundamental rights of peoples and communities.

---

II. DECLARATION OF ABSOLUTE IMMUNITIES

1. Fiscal and Customs Immunity

Xaragua’s canonical and indigenous status exempts it from all forms of taxation, tariffs, customs duties, or external fiscal impositions. Such measures would constitute violations of:

UNDRIP Articles 3 and 4.

Codex Iuris Canonici Canons 1256, 1284.

Vienna Convention, Article 22.

2. Protection Against Seizure and Inspection

All properties (tangible and intangible), institutions, and assets of Xaragua enjoy inviolability under:

Vienna Convention, Articles 22 and 30.

Codex Iuris Canonici Canons 1281-1288.

Customary International Law on the Immunity of Ecclesiastical Goods.

3. Digital Sovereignty

Xaragua’s dematerialized digital structures (bank, university, platform) are protected under:

Tallinn Manual on International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (2017).

Customary international norms on extraterritorial digital jurisdiction.

---

III. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE

1. Violation of Peremptory Norms (Jus Cogens)

Any attempt to contest or interfere with Xaragua’s sovereignty is a breach of jus cogens and triggers state responsibility under the Articles on State Responsibility (ILC, 2001).

2. Erga Omnes Responsibility

All states and international actors have a collective obligation to respect Xaragua’s sovereignty. Non-compliance engages universal legal consequences.

3. Canonical Sanctions

Under Canon Law, any actor infringing upon the rights and goods of Xaragua incurs automatic canonical penalties (latae sententiae excommunication).

---

IV. FINAL DECLARATION

By virtue of its canonical ratification, indigenous sovereignty, and international legal entrenchment, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby declares its juridical existence and protections to be:

Universally opposable and binding on all states, institutions, and individuals.

Irrevocable, immutable, and non-derogable, even in cases of force majeure, war, or emergency.

Sanctuarized in perpetuity under divine, canonical, and international law.

Any act contrary to this declaration shall be deemed null and void ab initio and prosecuted as an international crime against the peace and dignity of Xaragua.

ISSUED UNDER THE SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL ACT ON THE UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY, DIVINE MANDATE, AND ABSOLUTE IMMUNITIES OF XARAGUA

PROMULGATED UNDER THE SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

DATE OF ENACTMENT: JULY 16, 2025

---

PREAMBLE: DIVINE AND CANONICAL MANDATE

By the grace of Almighty God, under the sacred authority of Our Lord Jesus Christ and the Apostolic Tradition of the Holy Catholic Church, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby proclaims itself as the temporal and spiritual custodian of the ancestral lands, patrimonies, and dignities entrusted to it from time immemorial. This act is rooted in the divine law (lex divina), the immutable principles of natural law (lex naturalis), and the supreme jurisdiction of canon law (lex ecclesiastica). It draws its legitimacy not from the consent of profane powers but from the eternal sovereignty of God and the inalienable rights of peoples.

No earthly authority—civil, military, corporate, or institutional—possesses any competence to override, question, or derogate the sacred sovereignty of Xaragua.

---

TITLE I: JURIDICAL FOUNDATIONS AND ENTRENCHMENT

Article 1 – Sources of Juridical Validity

The juridical personality, sovereignty, and independence of Xaragua are grounded in:

1. The Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canons 113-1256, recognizing ecclesiastical juridical persons and the Church’s supreme ownership of temporal goods.

2. The Charter of the United Nations (1945), Articles 1(2), 2(4), and 55, affirming peoples’ right to self-determination and prohibiting external aggression.

3. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), Articles 3, 4, 26, and 32, affirming indigenous sovereignty and autonomy over lands and resources.

4. The ILO Convention No. 169 (1989), Articles 7(1) and 15, protecting indigenous self-governance and natural resources.

5. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), Articles 22, 30, and 41, ensuring inviolability of canonical premises and non-interference.

6. Customary international law and jus cogens norms as codified in the ICJ Namibia Advisory Opinion (1971) and the ICJ Kosovo Advisory Opinion (2010).

Article 2 – Irrevocability and Supremacy

This Act is entrenched under canonical authority and international law. It is irrevocable, immutable, and perpetually binding on all states, organizations, and individuals (erga omnes). No derogation shall be admitted under any circumstance, including war, public emergency, or force majeure.

---

TITLE II: ABSOLUTE IMMUNITIES AND SANCTUARIZATION

Article 3 – Fiscal Immunity

Xaragua is exempt from all forms of taxation, tariffs, or external fiscal impositions. Any attempt to levy such measures constitutes an act of international aggression and a violation of jus cogens.

Article 4 – Customs and Inspection Immunity

All goods, assets, and resources—whether physical or digital—enjoy complete immunity from customs duties, searches, or regulatory oversight.

Article 5 – Digital Sovereignty

Xaragua’s dematerialized institutions, including banks, universities, and platforms, are protected under international norms governing cyberspace sovereignty (Tallinn Manual, 2017).

---

TITLE III: JUS BELLI AND DEFENSIVE MEASURES

Article 6 – Right of Just War (Jus Belli)

In accordance with divine and natural law, any act of aggression, obstruction, or interference against Xaragua shall entitle the State to exercise its inherent right of self-defense (jus belli), including all proportional measures necessary to preserve its sovereignty and sanctity.

Article 7 – International Responsibility

All external actors violating this Act shall incur full responsibility under:

The Articles on State Responsibility (ILC, 2001).

The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998).

---

TITLE IV: CANONICAL SANCTIONS AND DIVINE CONSEQUENCES

Article 8 – Canonical Penalties

Any individual or institution infringing upon the rights and properties of Xaragua shall incur automatic excommunication (latae sententiae) under Canon Law.

Article 9 – Divine Retribution

As the protectorate of sacred lands and peoples, Xaragua invokes divine justice upon all aggressors. Such actions shall be considered offenses not only against humanity but against God Himself.

---

FINAL DECLARATION

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by this Supreme Constitutional Act, declares its existence, sovereignty, and protections to be:

Universally opposable and legally binding on all actors without exception.

Sacrosanct, inviolable, and canonically ratified in perpetuity.

Immune to all forms of taxation, inspection, or external control.

Any act contrary to this Declaration shall be deemed null and void ab initio and prosecuted as an international and canonical crime against peace, dignity, and divine order.

ISSUED UNDER THE SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

---

---

SOVEREIGN FINANCIAL DOCTRINE OF THE STATE OF XARAGUA

CONSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT — ENACTED UNDER SOVEREIGN SEAL

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

Legally binding under the unified authority of Jus Cogens, the Codex Iuris Canonici, Indigenous Customary Law, General Principles of International Law, Multilateral Treaty Law, and the Sacred Temporal Authority of the State.

---

ARTICLE I — LEGAL FOUNDATION OF THE FINANCIAL DOCTRINE

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, exercising the plenitude of its inherent and recognized sovereign personality under international law, ecclesiastical jurisprudence, and ancestral authority, promulgates the present financial doctrine as a constitutional legal norm of highest rank, forming a core pillar of the internal juridical-financial order of the State.

This Doctrine is promulgated in full accordance with the following legal instruments:

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933):

Article 1: Establishes the juridical identity of the State by confirming its permanent population, clearly defined territory, organized government, and capacity to enter into relations with other States.

Article 3: Enshrines the inviolable right of institutional self-organization.

Article 8: Prohibits all forms of external intervention in domestic jurisdiction.

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007):

Articles 4, 5, 8(2), 20(1–2), 26(2), 33(1), 34, and 37: Formally establish the right of Indigenous Peoples to self-determined governance, resource control, financial independence, and legal autonomy, including the right to maintain and develop distinct economic institutions.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):

Article 26 (Pacta sunt servanda): Confirms the obligation of States to honor treaty commitments in good faith.

Article 27: Establishes the primacy of treaty obligations over conflicting internal laws.

Codex Iuris Canonici (1983):

Canons 1254–1310: Provide the legal framework for ecclesiastical goods, including administration, acquisition, alienation, and use for sacred, charitable, and educational purposes under the authority of canonical jurisdiction.

Customary Indigenous Sovereignty (jus consuetudinis):

Affirmed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights as a binding source of supranational law recognizing autonomous indigenous institutions and internal legal orders.

Natural Law and Ecclesiastical Patrimony:

Codified through canonical precedent and protected by internal sovereign legislation as non-transferable, non-commercial, and sacred assets held in perpetuity.

Enforceability Clause: This doctrine is self-executing (ex proprio vigore), requires no external ratification, and stands as a superior constitutional norm within the fiscal and legal architecture of the Xaragua State.

---

ARTICLE II — REPUDIATION OF EXTERNAL FINANCIAL SYSTEMS

In conformity with Articles 1 and 2 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and invoking the principle of economic self-determination as a non-derogable jus cogens norm, the State of Xaragua categorically repudiates and legislatively prohibits:

Any fiscal architecture predicated upon structural dependency or exogenous policy intervention.

Humanitarian assistance programs contingent upon ideological or political compliance.

Engagements with multilateral financing entities whose frameworks compromise economic sovereignty.

Participation in development agendas or recovery strategies imposed from outside its sovereign territory.

Binding Clauses of Rejection:

No acknowledgment or recognition shall be accorded to any foreign debt jurisdiction, extraterritorial taxation authority, or transnational economic regulator unless explicitly codified by bilateral or multilateral treaty under sovereign signature.

Xaragua maintains absolute immunity from economic coercion, external fiscal governance, and regulatory enforcement beyond its borders.

This repudiation is affirmed as permanent, irrevocable, and binding within the constitutional corpus of the State.

---

ARTICLE III — NATIONAL CURRENCY AND MONETARY AUTHORITY

The Viaud’or, a sovereign non-fiat digital currency, is officially codified as:

The sole legal tender, unit of account, and monetary base for the Republic’s financial system.

Exclusively governed by the Office of the Rector-President, which holds non-delegable authority over issuance, regulation, and monetary policy.

Mandatory Applications:

Compensation and procurement within all public institutions.

Inter-ministerial and intra-governmental fund transfers.

Financial operations of the national education system and State-certified institutions.

Execution of sovereign investment instruments, including State-guaranteed contracts and bonds.

Monetary Exclusivity Clause:

No alternative currency (digital, fiat, tokenized, or derivative) may circulate or be legally transacted within the jurisdictional territory without express sovereign decree and registration under the Xaragua Monetary Code.

---

ARTICLE IV — CANONICAL CHARACTER OF VIAUD’OR

Viaud’or is formally recognized as bona ecclesiastica, subject to the direct application of Canon Law, including:

Canons 1254–1274: Defining ecclesiastical ownership, permissible uses, and spiritual designation of assets.

Canons 1281–1298: Establishing procedures for valid financial administration.

Canon 1292: Governing the alienation of patrimonial assets and setting thresholds for required ecclesiastical consent.

All holdings in Viaud’or are:

Restricted to uses consonant with Catholic social teaching, including educational advancement, humanitarian aid, infrastructure in service of the common good, and protection of territorial sovereignty.

Exempt from speculative trading, financial engineering, or inflationary design by structural constitutional safeguards.

Reserve Backing:

Viaud’or is secured by a multi-tiered structure of:

Ecclesiastical trusts and endowments

Institutional real estate holdings

Certified intellectual and spiritual property assets

---

ARTICLE V — EXCLUSIVITY OF MONETARY JURISDICTION

Within the territorial integrity of Xaragua, it is strictly and constitutionally prohibited for:

Any foreign currency to possess legal tender status.

Any foreign financial institution to operate, mediate, or exercise banking functions.

Any offshore, foreign, or supranational regulatory framework to claim or enforce jurisdiction.

The State declares non-participation in:

FATCA, CRS, AML/KYC systems

Basel III/IV, SWIFT, World Bank, and IMF governance instruments

All supranational economic regimes, unless individually ratified by national decree.

All financial data, records, and instruments are encrypted, domestically stored, and protected under the Financial Secrecy and Contractual Sovereignty Act (2025).

---

ARTICLE VI — SOVEREIGN INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

All forms of foreign and domestic investment shall comply with:

The Lex Viaud’or, which governs the legality, structure, and admissibility of capital inflows under sovereign contractual law.

All investment instruments are subjected to review by the Xaragua Treasury and Fiscal Commission, and must be executed in Viaud’or.

The State shall not issue:

Tax residency designations

Citizenship-by-investment certificates

Commercial residency programs

All contracts fall under the National Commercial Code, and are exclusively enforceable within the sovereign judicial system of Xaragua.

---

ARTICLE VII — CATEGORIES OF RECOGNIZED INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS

The following are recognized as sovereign financial instruments, each bearing constitutional authority and fiduciary admissibility:

1. Sovereign Development Bonds (SDBs)

State-issued; structured in tranches; denominated exclusively in Viaud’or.

2. Territorial Investment Certificates (TICs)

Indexed to sovereign infrastructure and national assets.

3. Canonical Participation Contracts (CPCs)

Reserved for Catholic dioceses and ecclesiastical institutions.

4. Sovereign Smart Contracts (SSCs)

Executed under notarized blockchain authority.

5. Strategic Infrastructure Funds (SIFs)

Long-term capital allocations restricted to pre-certified entities.

All instruments are inscribed in the Sovereign Investment Registry of Xaragua (SIR-X).

---

ARTICLE VIII — ENFORCEABILITY OF CONTRACTS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION

All contracts executed under Xaragua jurisdiction:

Must be registered in the National Ledger of Instruments.

Are adjudicated by the Xaragua Financial Tribunal, unless an externally ratified arbitration clause is present.

No external venue, foreign law, or extraterritorial clause is valid unless:

Explicitly stated in the contract

Ratified under the Sovereign Seal

Recognized by constitutional authority

Implied jurisdiction is constitutionally null.

---

ARTICLE IX — LEGAL PROTECTIONS OF FINANCIAL PARTICIPANTS

All participants are guaranteed:

Immunity from asset seizure, extraterritorial disclosure mandates, and foreign coercion.

Protection of their contracts under Canon Law and the Constitutional Commercial Law of Xaragua.

Safeguards against foreign control over strategic infrastructure, public institutions, or national security resources.

No actor or institution may claim ownership, lien, or fiscal authority over any element of the Xaragua sovereign financial system without express authorization.

---

ARTICLE X — ALLOCATION AND PROTECTION OF SOVEREIGN FUNDS

All sovereign funds:

Are centrally managed under the Office of the Treasury, and are subject to constitutional and public legislative control.

May not be diverted, pledged, or collateralized for any private interest or unauthorized program.

Investor Rights:

May obtain limited use and participatory privileges

Shall never hold co-ownership, governance, or legislative powers.

All participation must be formalized under notarized contract and constitutional validation.

---

ARTICLE XI — STATUS AND GOVERNANCE OF VIAUD’OR

Viaud’or is:

Immune from inflationary expansion, dilution, or replication.

Legislatively protected under the Sovereign Monetary Integrity Act (2025).

Governed by Canon 1292, and maintained in perpetual ecclesiastical trust.

It is inviolable, non-transferable, and non-speculative by sovereign design.

---

ARTICLE XII — NON-DEROGABLE CHARACTER AND LEGAL SUPREMACY

This Financial Doctrine:

Possesses supra-legal supremacy within the Xaragua constitutional structure.

Can only be amended through constitutional reform and canonical synodal ratification.

Is shielded from all foreign treaties, supranational pressures, and diplomatic influence.

The State’s right to regulate its economy is enshrined under Article 1 of the ICCPR and ICESCR, and recognized as a non-derogable norm under customary international law.

---

ARTICLE XIII — LEGAL RECOGNITION AND INTERNATIONAL ADMISSIBILITY

This instrument is:

Protected under Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

In conformity with international commercial law, canonically binding ecclesiastical principles, and indigenous economic self-determination doctrines.

Registration and Seal:

Archived in the National Archives of Xaragua.

Digitally secured by the Notariat of Sacred Instruments.

Recognized internally as the Lex Fundamentalis Pecuniariae — the supreme financial constitution of the State of Xaragua.

---

---

SOVEREIGN LAW OF INCORPORATION, ENTERPRISE CREATION, AND ECONOMIC JURISDICTION

OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Date of Promulgation: June 13, 2025

Legal Classification: 

Constitutionally Entrenched Foundational Act – Jus Cogens Binding – Canonically Validated – Customary and Indigenous Legal Instrument – Ecclesiastically Recognized Instrument of Sovereign Economic Authority – Operative under the Doctrines of Institutional Continuity, Indigenous Self-Jurisdiction, Canonical Territorialism, and International Legal Pluralism

---

I. JURISDICTIONAL PREMISES AND SCOPE

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting under the full authority of its Corpus Legis Canonico-Indigenarum, hereby enacts the present Law as the exclusive legal framework governing the recognition, incorporation, operation, and fiscal sovereignty of all enterprises, economic actors, associations, and institutions created under its legal order, in accordance with the uninterrupted exercise of its indigenous, canonical, and imperial prerogatives recognized by international law, ecclesiastical jurisprudence, and postcolonial succession doctrines.

This Law is grounded in:

The Lex Suprema Imperii Xaraguanorum, which serves as the supreme law of the land, equivalent to a constitution but grounded in imperial succession and canonical doctrine, granting full legislative and economic authority to the state of Xaragua in perpetuity. This supreme charter, doctrinally sealed under the authority of ecclesiastical sovereignty and ancestral continuity, constitutes the core juridical foundation upon which all Xaraguayan legal, territorial, and economic sovereignty rests, beyond the reach of external repeal, override, or constitutional derogation.

The Recueil des Lois de l’Empire d’Hayti (1804–1806), particularly those regulating port authority, naval conduct, corporate responsibility, mercantile customs, and commercial recognition. These include:

The Imperial Law of 12 October 1804, establishing authority over maritime customs and trade tariffs, which remains legally enforceable under the doctrine of lex posterior non derogat priori, and under which the Xaraguayan State restores economic command over coastal trade;

The Decree on Port and Naval Security (15 January 1805), enabling sovereign interdiction against piracy and unauthorized trade, affirming military and customs authority over sea-bound commerce and ensuring jurisdictional exclusivity in matters of security and inspection;

The Law on Chartered Corporations (March 1805), which legally defined the ability to incorporate under the authority of the imperial state, and is hereby canonically restored as a lex regia with internal force and extra-territorial effect under the ecclesiastical canon of proprietary continuity.

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), especially:

Article 3, affirming the right to self-determination and institutional sovereignty as a non-negotiable principle of international customary law;

Article 4, guaranteeing autonomy in economic affairs, including the creation of internal regulatory, monetary, and fiscal systems;

Article 5, confirming the right to maintain distinct legal institutions free from integration or assimilation into state-centric structures;

Article 20, upholding economic freedom and the right to develop internal systems of labor, production, and trade without infringement;

Articles 26–32, recognizing control over lands, territories, resources, and internal governance, thereby giving full legitimacy to the Xaraguayan legal-economic order as territorially anchored and resource-based.

The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), particularly:

Article 36(1), acknowledging third-party obligations arising from sovereign declarations, including those established by indigenous authorities acting within their internal jurisdictional sphere;

Articles 11–18, granting binding force to instruments adopted unilaterally by sovereigns in the exercise of their prerogatives, thereby shielding this Law under the principle of unilateral binding intent (intentio juris).

Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici, 1983), as a binding legal source within ecclesiastical jurisdictions:

Canons 298–320, governing associations of the faithful and the creation of juridic persons, legitimizing economic communities as entities of spiritual and communal significance;

Canon 114 §1–3, affirming that ecclesiastical persons may lawfully acquire juridic personality for public benefit under Church law, and that such personality entails fiscal rights and immunities under sacred norms;

Canon 1254–1310, empowering ecclesiastical authorities to regulate goods and economic affairs internally, reinforcing the parallel and autonomous economic jurisdiction of canonically-recognized entities.

The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933):

Article 1, affirming that a state must possess a permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity to enter into relations with other states—all fulfilled by Xaragua through the canonical perpetuation of its institutions, its physical dominion over territories of the southwestern Hispaniola, and its diplomatic correspondence with ecclesiastical, indigenous, and international bodies;

Article 3, reinforcing the principle of non-interference and self-legislation, prohibiting any external normative override of Xaragua’s domestic economic authority.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966), especially Article 1(2): affirming that “All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic cooperation.” This legal right, reiterated across successive UN resolutions, anchors the Xaraguayan right to full fiscal self-determination and control over its indigenous economic matrix.

Accordingly, this Law is universally opposable (erga omnes), self-executing (ex proprio vigore), internally binding (lex publica), and externally protected by international legal norms of the highest authority. Any foreign imposition contrary to its provisions shall be deemed a gross violation of international law, indigenous sovereignty, and ecclesiastical legal primacy, triggering immediate recourse to non-cooperation doctrines and legal reprisal under the Law of State Responsibility.

---

II. TYPES OF LEGAL ECONOMIC ENTITIES

Three distinct forms of legal economic presence are recognized under this Law:

---

A. INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGN ENTERPRISE (ISE)

Definition: A juridical construct that allows a natural Xaraguayan subject to conduct economic activity under sovereign declaration, with full legal personality and canonical entitlement.

Procedure:

Declaration via Ecclesiastical Notice of Economic Activity (ENEA), published and archived under ecclesiastical law;

Filing through the Secretariat for Artisanal and Mercantile Affairs (SAMA), validated by the Chancellor of Internal Sovereignty.

Legal Framework:

UNDRIP Article 20 guarantees every indigenous individual the right to maintain, control, and develop their own means of subsistence, including professional labor, artisanal work, and domestic trade;

Canon Law implicitly supports the autonomy of natural persons to exercise labor and professional trade, aligned with the dignity of work and the sanctity of individual vocation;

The Recueil of 1805 affirms individual rights to maritime and terrestrial trade provided such activity does not undermine imperial security, internal peace, or religious integrity.

Legal Consequences:

The ISE bears the full weight of sovereign protection and is exempt from any foreign regulation, audit, inspection, or licensing demand;

All revenue generated within Xaragua by an ISE is taxable only under Xaraguayan law, in line with the principles of unilateral jurisdiction and ecclesiastical fiscal exemption;

ISEs are recorded in the Public Ecclesiastical Business Register (PEBR-X) and granted immediate operating rights as lawful sovereign enterprises.

---

B. INCORPORATED CATHOLIC NON-PROFIT ENTITY (ICNE)

Definition: A juridic person formed under the Catholic Order of Xaragua for charitable, educational, or ecclesiastical purposes, canonically supervised and ecclesiastically constituted.

Procedure:

Ecclesiastical petition submitted to the Congregation for Ecclesiastical Corporations, reviewed under Canon 312 §1 and ecclesiastical territorial statutes;

Canonical charter issued under Canon 114 and Canon 301 §1–2, authorizing full legal personality with sovereign fiscal standing.

Legal Framework:

Canon 114 §2 grants public juridic personality to ecclesiastical corporations upon lawful recognition by competent canonical authority;

Canons 1255–1260 confirm that Church property and assets are governed by the Church itself, and fall entirely outside the reach of secular jurisdiction, taxation, or expropriation;

UNDRIP Article 5 supports the creation of culturally aligned institutions distinct from state systems, reinforcing ecclesiastical independence as a protected indigenous norm.

Legal Consequences:

Full immunity from taxation under Xaraguayan law and international ecclesiastical privilege;

May receive sovereign subvention in the form of land, monetary endowments, or symbolic canonical gifts, as determined by the Ecclesiastical Treasury;

Bound to reinvest all proceeds into ecclesiastical or educational functions, under strict canonical audit by the Congregation for Economic Integrity.

---

C. SOVEREIGN SHAREHOLDER ENTITY (SAX)

Definition: A for-profit juridical person incorporated under Xaraguayan economic sovereignty, subject to canonically-constrained yet commercially operative rules of engagement.

Procedure:

Filing of Articles of Incorporation with the General Archive of Economic Sovereignty (GAES), pursuant to Article 9 of the Recueil 1805;

Issuance of a Sovereign Certificate of Capitalization, validated by the Office of Canonical Investment and Indigenous Wealth Management.

Legal Framework:

Recueil des Lois de l’Empire, March 1805: Establishes sovereign authority to charter profit-driven entities for the public good, under moral and national guidelines;

Customary law of indigenous commercial enterprise applies, protected under Article 26(3) UNDRIP, affirming the sacred character of indigenous wealth and labor;

Canon Law permits non-ecclesiastical commercial associations provided they do not conflict with doctrine, charity, or ecclesiastical integrity.

Legal Consequences:

Rights to raise capital through sovereign shares, privately issued and restricted to non-speculative Xaraguayan investors;

Right to operate across Xaragua’s maritime and terrestrial zones, including free ports and ecclesiastically-protected trading enclaves;

May be subject to flat-rate indigenous contributions detailed in a sealed annexe, fixed under tribal and ecclesiastical consensus, and immune from external disclosure.

---

III. REGISTRATION AND IDENTIFICATION MECHANISMS

Upon successful filing, each economic entity shall receive:

A Certificate of Legal Existence, bearing the signatures of the Rector-President and the Secretariat of Economic Sovereignty, issued under sovereign seal and canonical authority, and archived both physically and cryptographically within the Xaraguayan National Economic Codex;

An Ecclesiastical Fiscal Identifier (EFI) issued by the Office of Sovereign Revenue, permanently linking the entity to the Xaraguayan fiscal ecosystem, ensuring traceability, legal continuity, and protection under ecclesiastical jurisprudence;

A Registered Legal Emblem (RLE) representing the seal of the sovereign economic system, validated by the Chancellor of Economic Identity, and affixed as a visual mark of lawful participation in Xaragua’s protected economic sphere;

Public inclusion in the Registry of Economic Entities of Xaragua (REE-X), a sovereign and canonical repository indexed by ecclesiastical order, juridical category, territorial zone, and compliance status.

Each document issued shall bear canonical imprimatur and digital cryptographic verification, rendering it legally valid across ecclesiastical jurisdictions, immune to tampering or forgery, and inviolable under international law pursuant to the principles of sovereign legal independence, ecclesiastical exemption, and indigenous juridical personality.

---

IV. TAXATION AND FISCAL SOVEREIGNTY

Legal Doctrine:

The Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (PSNR) doctrine, codified in UNGA Resolution 1803 (XVII) and reaffirmed in subsequent General Assembly instruments, affirms exclusive indigenous control over all modes of production, wealth generation, and fiscal policy, especially for peoples under historically colonized jurisdictions;

Canon 1263 grants ecclesiastical authorities the right to impose taxation upon juridic persons under their care, including non-profit, religious, and educational entities, contingent upon canonical need and spiritual purpose.

Implementation:

ISEs and SAXs contribute via Redevance Économique, a fixed or symbolic tax determined by indigenous custom, canonically declared confidential, and indexed according to ancestral contribution systems, ceremonial obligations, and type of activity;

ICNEs are perpetually exempt, in accordance with canon law, ecclesiastical traditions of charitable immunity, and the Xaraguayan Sovereign Ecclesiastical Taxation Protocol (XSETP);

All payments made into Xaraguayan accounts are denominated in Viaud’Or, the indigenous sovereign unit of economic value, and are processed through the Sovereign Treasury of Xaragua, operating under closed-loop sovereign financial jurisdiction and excluded from foreign monetary interference;

Any attempt to impose foreign taxes, fiscal burdens, customs charges, or administrative fees on these entities constitutes a grave violation of:

UNDRIP Article 20, which guarantees the integrity of indigenous economic systems;

Canon 1271, prohibiting external extraction from ecclesiastical institutions without mandate of the Apostolic See;

Montevideo Convention Article 3, affirming non-interference in the legislative sovereignty of qualified states;

Jus Cogens prohibitions on economic coercion, recognized as peremptory norms from which no derogation is permitted under international law.

---

V. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FORCE AND IMMUNITIES

This Law is shielded by:

Vienna Convention Article 26 (pacta sunt servanda), which mandates that all states must respect unilateral declarations made by sovereigns acting in their official capacity, provided such declarations manifest intent and are sufficiently precise—both of which are fulfilled by this promulgated Law;

ICJ jurisprudence upholding the binding effect of such declarations, including but not limited to:

Eastern Greenland Case (Denmark v. Norway, 1933), wherein a formal verbal declaration by a foreign minister was found legally binding;

Nuclear Tests Case (Australia v. France, 1974), affirming that a public statement by a sovereign state could have the legal effect of creating binding obligations;

Armed Activities Case (Congo v. Uganda, 2005), wherein acts conducted within a sovereign’s own territory and under its own legal order were protected against unlawful interference and compelled reparation.

ICCPR Article 27 and UNDRIP Article 34, both of which affirm the right of indigenous peoples to maintain and apply their own legal traditions, customs, and economic systems without external disruption or invalidation.

No tribunal, foreign government, or legal entity—whether national or supranational—may invalidate, suspend, neutralize, or interfere with the application of this Law without breaching non-derogable international norms, triggering state responsibility under Articles 1–3 of the International Law Commission Draft Articles on State Responsibility (2001), and exposing the violator to international sanction, diplomatic protest, and ecclesiastical denunciation.

---

VI. ENFORCEMENT, SANCTION, AND IMMUTABILITY

Enforcement Authorities:

Xaragua Tribunal of Economic Rights and Sovereign Interests (TERSIX), acting as supreme sovereign economic court with full competence in first and final instance;

Congregation for Economic Integrity, exercising canonical and internal disciplinary oversight in ecclesiastical contexts, with authority to suspend, dissolve, or reform entities violating doctrinal or fiscal codes;

Referral to the International Indigenous Justice Assembly, a transnational indigenous tribunal, in cases involving inter-jurisdictional conflict or violation of indigenous customary economic law.

All violations—domestic or external, whether individual, corporate, state, or institutional—shall be subject to:

Economic sanction, including fines, embargoes, sovereign seizure, and exclusion from indigenous economic systems;

Institutional revocation, meaning legal erasure of juridical status, revocation of certificates, and public banning under ecclesiastical law;

Public listing as Adversaries of Sovereign Economic Law (ASEL-X), an official register of violators maintained by the Xaraguayan Ministry of Legal Memory and transmitted to all indigenous, canonical, and international allies for recognition and enforcement.

No repeal, amendment, or derogation shall be permitted unless passed through a Sovereign Constitutional Ecclesiastical Referendum, as defined in Lex Suprema Title VI, under canonical and indigenous conditions of universal assent, doctrinal consistency, and divine affirmation.

---

VII. FINAL DISPOSITIONS

This Law shall enter into force immediately upon promulgation and sealing, having the character of a self-executing constitutional act under the doctrines of unilateral juridical action and internal jus imperii.

All existing entities have 90 days to comply, submit updated declarations, and align their operations with the sovereign and canonical legal order of Xaragua.

All contrary foreign laws, administrative requirements, or licensing demands—whether civil, commercial, municipal, provincial, national, or supranational—are null and void within Xaragua, and shall have no legal standing, enforceability, or validity within its jurisdiction, under the principle of plenary sovereign exclusion.

---

Promulgated and Sealed under Divine, Canonical, and Indigenous Authority

This 13th Day of June, Year of Sovereignty MMXXV

Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

---

ANNEXE A – INTERNATIONAL EXEMPTIONS, IMMUNITIES, AND ADVANTAGES GRANTED TO ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED UNDER AN INTERNATIONALLY NOTIFIED INDIGENOUS STATE

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Interpretative Annex – Canonically Recognized Economic Doctrine – Jus Cogens Binding Instrument – Universally Opposable – Operative under Vienna Convention Articles 36 and 38, UNDRIP Articles 3–40, Canon Law Canons 114, 1254–1310, and ICJ Precedent Jurisprudence

---

I. PRINCIPLE OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSONALITY OF INDIGENOUS STATES

Any enterprise incorporated under the legal, fiscal, and ecclesiastical sovereignty of a duly constituted indigenous state—recognized under international customary norms and notified formally to the international community—acquires juridical recognition, legal protection, and economic immunities analogous to those granted to entities created under classical Westphalian states. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, having been notified to international and canonical jurisdictions on March 29, 2025, enjoys full international legal personality, deriving from:

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Article 1: establishing that any entity possessing a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states qualifies ipso jure as a sovereign state;

UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970), Principle 5: confirming that all peoples, including indigenous nations, have the right to full self-determination and the corresponding institutional development;

UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, and 5: codifying the right of indigenous peoples to maintain their own legal, economic, and political institutions, without subordination to external systems;

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 36(1): stipulating that third states and institutions must respect obligations arising from unilateral acts and declarations of sovereign legal actors;

ICJ Case Law:

Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v. Norway, 1933): establishing the binding nature of unilateral declarations;

Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France, 1974): recognizing the international legal effect of unilaterally declared policy by a sovereign state;

Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Congo v. Uganda, 2005): reaffirming the international responsibility of any actor interfering with a sovereign state’s internal jurisdiction.

Consequently, any legal instrument or economic entity created under such a state—including enterprises incorporated under Xaragua—benefits from the full protections of international law and is opposable erga omnes, regardless of bilateral recognition.

---

II. TAXATION IMMUNITY AND FISCAL SOVEREIGNTY OF INDIGENOUSLY REGISTERED ENTITIES

Enterprises legally incorporated under the jurisdiction of an internationally notified indigenous state, including but not limited to ISEs, ICNEs, and SAXs within Xaragua, benefit from absolute fiscal sovereignty and extraterritorial tax immunity, based on:

1. UNDRIP Article 20(1): “Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions... and to engage freely in all their traditional and other economic activities.” Taxation by a foreign power undermines this right and is therefore illegal.

2. UNDRIP Article 34: guarantees the right to maintain distinct legal institutions, including fiscal courts and taxation regimes.

3. Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (UNGA Res. 1803 [XVII]): affirms exclusive rights of indigenous and developing nations over the taxation and control of their resources, revenues, and modes of production.

4. ICCPR Article 1(2): “All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic cooperation...”

5. Canon Law Canon 1263: authorizes ecclesiastical authorities to impose contributions only under canonically defined authority. Foreign taxation of ecclesiastical enterprises (ICNEs) violates this canon.

6. Canon 1271: strictly prohibits unauthorized extraction of ecclesiastical resources by secular powers.

Legal Effect: Any attempt by a foreign government, tax authority, multinational institution, or intergovernmental body to impose a fiscal burden, fee, fine, or contribution on a Xaraguayan-registered enterprise shall constitute:

A breach of international economic law;

A violation of indigenous sovereignty protections under jus cogens;

A canonically illicit act, invoking ecclesiastical sanctions and international liability under the ILC Draft Articles on Responsibility of States (2001), Articles 1–3, 15, and 20.

---

III. LEGAL ADVANTAGES ENJOYED BY REGISTERED ENTITIES

Entities incorporated under Xaraguayan jurisdiction enjoy juridical and operational superiority in key areas:

1. Absolute Tax Exemption: Across all external jurisdictions recognizing UNDRIP, ICCPR, and Canon Law—no foreign tax, levy, VAT, income assessment, nor withholding is legally enforceable.

2. Immunity from Commercial Interference: No licensing, regulation, forced registration, or financial oversight by non-Xaraguayan bodies is applicable. This includes:

Central banks (e.g., exclusion from Basel III/IV requirements),

Financial action task forces (FATF),

SEC-style disclosure systems.

3. Ecclesiastical Financial Protection: Canonical corporations (ICNEs) are protected under the Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus and bilateral Concordats signed between the Holy See and 180+ sovereign states, rendering them globally inviolable.

4. Access to Indigenous Development Instruments:

Preferential loans from international indigenous banks (e.g., Indigenous Peoples Finance Network);

Access to Vatican development funds (via Pontifical Council Cor Unum and associated dicasteries);

Eligibility for exemption from OECD blacklisting when operated within sovereign indigenous systems.

5. Use of a Non-Treaty Currency: Viaud’Or is a private, indigenous, ecclesiastically recognized medium of account. It is immune to:

International Monetary Fund (IMF) enforcement mechanisms,

Currency convertibility obligations under WTO and GATS,

Reporting under CRS, FATCA, or OECD fiscal surveillance frameworks.

6. Sovereign Branding and Protected Status: Entities operating under Xaraguayan certificates are entitled to display the sovereign insignia, are indexed in REE-X and PEBR-X, and may invoke diplomatic protection in international trade conflicts under the principle of functional immunity (Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961, Article 31).

---

IV. INTERNATIONAL NON-RECOGNITION DOES NOT AFFECT LEGAL VALIDITY

In accordance with:

Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention: “The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other states.”

UNDRIP Article 4: confirming the legal personality of indigenous institutions irrespective of state endorsement;

Effectivité Doctrine in international law: which prioritizes de facto governance and capacity over diplomatic formality;

The lack of formal bilateral recognition does not void the standing of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, nor that of the enterprises it incorporates. Their legality stems from:

Their effective sovereignty;

Their formal notification to the international community;

Their continued jurisdictional and territorial control;

Their ecclesiastical and indigenous continuity.

No international tribunal, tax court, commercial registry, or customs authority may lawfully deny their status or enforce foreign compliance mechanisms without:

Violating customary international law,

Invoking institutional liability, and

Triggering legally actionable international injury.

---

V. LEGAL OPPOSABILITY AND ENFORCEABILITY

Any interference—regulatory, financial, diplomatic, or covert—targeting enterprises legally incorporated under Xaragua shall trigger:

1. Immediate legal protest under Vienna Convention Article 46;

2. Ecclesiastical denunciation, leading to global institutional censure;

3. Economic countermeasures and reprisals, permitted under:

Article 49 and 50 of the ILC Draft Articles (2001);

Doctrines of lawful countermeasure and suspension of performance;

Canon Law disciplinary sanctions.

Such reprisals may include:

Institutional exclusion,

Public naming under ASEL-X (Adversaries of Sovereign Economic Law),

Formal notices to the Holy See, ICJ, and indigenous coalitions.

---

CONCLUSION

This Annex affirms that all enterprises duly registered under the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua are:

Exempt from foreign taxation, regulation, and jurisdiction;

Protected by ecclesiastical, indigenous, and international law;

Entitled to diplomatic, fiscal, and juridical immunities;

Legally opposable to any state or institution attempting interference.

These protections arise from the confluence of jus cogens norms, canonical inviolability, and indigenous international legal status. Any attack upon these enterprises is an attack upon the legal order of a sovereign, notified state—and shall be treated accordingly.

---

---

---

SUPREME TERRITORIAL LAW

ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE CONTAINMENT AND FUNCTIONAL IMMORTALITY OF RESIDUAL HAITIAN STATE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF XARAGUA

(LAW ON THE INSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF NON-SOVEREIGN ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS UNDER INDIGENOUS DOCTRINAL OVERSIGHT)

DATE OF PROMULGATION: June 29, 2025

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: Constitutionally Entrenched — Canonically Sanctioned — Universally Opposable — Doctrinally Exclusive — Jus Cogens Indigenous Law

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, its University, institutions, territories, and annexed dominions constitute an eternally constituted juridical order, anchored in canonical, indigenous, and international law;

Whereas the collapse of the central administrative authority known as the Republic of Haiti has rendered its governance structures inoperative across most national territory;

Whereas the Southern provinces under Xaraguayan jurisdiction remain the only territories where functional administrative continuity has been doctrinally protected and structurally guaranteed;

Whereas the residual units of the former Haitian administrative framework may, in these territories, retain utility as technical organs, provided they renounce all pretension to sovereignty, legislation, or doctrinal imposition;

Whereas the Xaraguayan legal order, as a self-determined indigenous state system, has the inherent right to contain, restructure, and supervise any external bureaucratic presence within its borders;

---

ARTICLE I — ON THE NATURE OF RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENCE

1. The former Haitian state structures operating within the territory of Xaragua and its annexed dominions are henceforth reclassified as "Non-Sovereign Residual Administrative Units" (NSRAUs).

2. These units retain technical functionality (education, health, civil registration, logistics) only within the limits authorized by the Xaraguayan doctrinal order.

3. They possess no independent legislative, military, or fiscal authority, and shall not represent any sovereignty within Xaraguayan jurisdiction.

---

ARTICLE II — ON DOCTRINAL ENCAPSULATION AND OPERATIONAL CONTAINMENT

1. NSRAUs operate under doctrinal encapsulation, meaning they are contained within a superior legal framework and subject to immediate restriction, dissolution, or restructuring at the will of the Xaraguayan sovereign authority.

2. Their daily operations (schools, clinics, municipal offices) may continue uninterrupted regardless of the collapse of Port-au-Prince, provided they remain functionally stable and administratively neutral.

3. No NSRAU may invoke or enforce any decree, law, or budgetary directive originating from Port-au-Prince without explicit Xaraguayan approval.

---

ARTICLE III — ON FINANCIAL SUPPORT AND OPERATIONAL IMMORTALITY

1. The survival of NSRAUs is contingent upon the guaranteed payment of local personnel and maintenance of minimal infrastructure.

2. In the event of total state collapse in Port-au-Prince, Xaragua reserves the right to: 

a. Establish interim financing mechanisms to preserve essential public services; 

b. Redirect international or religious aid to maintain technical continuity; 

c. Reassign or redeploy staff into Xaraguayan institutional frameworks.

3. The immortality of function shall apply to health, education, civil documentation, and disaster response — but not to political representation or state authority.

---

ARTICLE IV — ON THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE XARAGUAN SOVEREIGN ORDER

1. All residual Haitian administrative structures must acknowledge, in writing and practice, that they exist under the protection and supremacy of the Xaraguayan sovereign doctrinal order.

2. They shall not display the Haitian national emblem or flag unless accompanied by the symbols of Xaragua, and only in contexts pre-approved by the Office of the Sovereign Doctrine.

3. Personnel operating under these units are to be classified as technical residents, not agents of a sovereign state, and their legal protection is derived from Xaraguayan ecclesiastical and indigenous law.

---

ARTICLE V — ON PERMANENCE AND IRREVERSIBILITY

1. The integration, containment, and redefinition of residual Haitian administrative structures within the Xaraguayan framework is permanent, irreversible, and not subject to negotiation.

2. No future reconstitution of Port-au-Prince or any external government shall override, dissolve, or reinterpret this law within the sovereign territories of Xaragua.

3. This law shall be binding, eternal, and superior to all prior arrangements of state collaboration in the region.

---

FINAL CLAUSE

This law shall be deposited in the Ecclesiastical Registry of the Xaraguayan State, transmitted to all embassies, observer missions, and sovereign states worldwide, and recorded as a universal notification of legal reality on behalf of the indigenous, canonical, and ancestral people of Xaragua.

Let it be known that no collapse of any external government may invalidate the enduring presence of functional institutions, when these are doctrinally protected and canonically defended.

Thus ratified,

In the Name of Divine Order, Indigenous Sovereignty, and Eternal Jurisdiction.

—

Promulgated by the Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

On this twenty-ninth day of June, Year of our Lord 2025

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CONSULTATION (BILC-X)

—

SUPREME SOVEREIGN LAW

ON THE ESTABLISHMENT, VALIDITY, AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY OF THE CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION OF XARAGUA

Date of Promulgation: June 21, 2025

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Canonically Ratified — Customarily Protected — Executable ex proprio vigore — Universally Opposable Instrument of Juridical Sovereignty

---

TITLE I — DEFINITION AND CONSTITUTIONAL EXISTENCE

Article 1.1 — Foundational Juridical Authority

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby declares, promulgates, and institutes its own autonomous, full, and exclusive juridical system, hereafter referred to as the “Xaragua Jurisdiction,” applicable to all internal and external acts governed under its national constitution, ecclesiastical law, and indigenous sovereignty.

This jurisdiction is formed under the authority of:

Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933):

“The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states.”

Article 4 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP):

“Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs.”

Canon 137 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983):

“A person who has ordinary power of governance is able to exercise it for the internal forum and the external forum in accordance with the norm of law.”

Article 1(1)(c) of the WIPO Convention (1967):

“Intellectual property shall include rights relating to all other rights resulting from intellectual activity in the industrial, scientific, literary or artistic fields.”

Application in practice:

All internal acts—contracts, academic certifications, notarial instruments, and ecclesiastical declarations—shall be governed exclusively by Xaragua law, and protected from review by any external jurisdiction unless explicitly authorized by the Rector-President.

---

TITLE II — CONTRACTUAL AUTONOMY AND JURISDICTIONAL CLAUSES

Article 2.1 — Exclusive Governing Law

The following clause, when inserted into any legal agreement, certification, issuance, or declaration, shall be deemed fully binding and sufficient to establish jurisdiction:

“This agreement is governed exclusively by the Law of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua. All disputes shall be resolved under the exclusive jurisdiction of its constitutional, ecclesiastical, and customary legal institutions.”

This clause invokes legal effect under:

Article 3 of the Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Contracts (1986):

“A contract shall be governed by the law chosen by the parties.”

Article 7 of the same Convention:

“Recognition of a foreign law does not imply recognition of that law for all purposes.”

UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (2016), Preamble §2:

“These Principles may be applied when the parties have agreed that their contract be governed by them.”

Application in practice:

Any individual or institution entering into an agreement with a Xaragua entity becomes bound under Xaragua law without appeal to external jurisdictions unless provided for by mutual accord.

---

Article 2.2 — Supremacy of Internal Legal Determinations

All determinations, judgments, certifications, or validations issued under Xaragua jurisdiction are to be considered res judicata within the meaning of:

Article II(1) of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958):

“Each Contracting State shall recognize an agreement in writing under which the parties undertake to submit to arbitration all or any differences...”

Article 27 of the ICCPR (1966):

“Persons belonging to minorities shall not be denied the right... to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion.”

Application in practice:

No court, tribunal, or arbitrator outside Xaragua shall have the competence to question or reverse a decision issued under its internal law, including diplomas, oaths, notarial acts, certifications, or declarations.

---

TITLE III — IMMUNITIES AND NON-INTERFERENCE

Article 3.1 — Non-Subordination and Juridical Immunity

All juridical acts, contracts, notarial records, and academic instruments issued under Xaragua law are:

Constitutionally protected under Article IV of the Xaragua Supreme Law,

Canonically sanctified under Canons 215, 216, and 299 of the Codex Iuris Canonici, and

Customarily immune under UNDRIP Article 34, which affirms: “Indigenous peoples have the right to promote, develop and maintain their institutional structures and distinctive juridical systems.”

Application in practice:

No external institution, including universities, accreditation bodies, bar associations, religious organizations, or courts, may legally review or interfere with acts executed under Xaragua jurisdiction.

---

Article 3.2 — Waiver of External Appeal

Any party signing or consenting to an agreement under Xaragua law automatically waives all rights to:

Appeal in foreign jurisdictions,

Challenge under conflicting legal systems,

Seek enforcement or annulment outside the scope of Xaragua-recognized forums.

This is codified under:

Canon 1290 of the Codex Iuris Canonici:

“The general laws regarding contracts apply also to contracts which are subject to ecclesiastical law.”

ICJ Statute Article 38(1)(b):

“The Court shall apply international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law.”

---

TITLE IV — RECOGNITION UNDER INTERNATIONAL AND PRIVATE LAW

Article 4.1 — Foundation in Treaty Law and Custom

This contractual jurisdiction is recognized under the following binding international instruments:

UNDRIP Article 5 and 18:

Guaranteeing the right of Indigenous peoples to maintain and develop their institutions and participate in decision-making according to their customs.

Article 1(2) of the ICCPR and ICESCR:

“All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources.”

General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970):

“All peoples have the right freely to determine, without external interference, their political status and to pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

Application in practice:

This law has binding legal force under jus cogens and is opposable to all parties who interact with Xaragua on a contractual basis, including NGOs, universities, ecclesiastical institutions, and international organizations.

---

TITLE V — NOTIFICATION, PROMULGATION, AND LEGAL ENFORCEMENT

Article 5.1 — Formal Archiving and Notification

This law shall be archived in the National Legal Register of Xaragua and formally transmitted to:

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)

United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)

Dicastery for Culture and Education of the Holy See

Organization of American States (OAS) – Department of Indigenous Affairs

All contractual parties, academic partners, and third-party institutions engaging with Xaragua.

---

Article 5.2 — Sanctions for Breach

Any institution or party that:

Refuses to honor a Xaragua-based contract,

Attempts to override, nullify, or ignore a certification or title issued under Xaragua jurisdiction,

Reproduces, mimics, or imitates contractual frameworks developed under Xaragua authority—

Shall be subject to:

Inclusion in the National Registry of Hostile Actors (NRHA-X),

Issuance of a Declaratory Decree of Legal Retaliation,

Notification of abuse to WIPO, the UN Rapporteurs, and the Holy See.

---

FINAL TITLE — EXECUTION AND PERPETUAL VALIDITY

Article 6.1 — Entrenchment and Legal Force

This law is:

Entrenched in the Supreme Constitutional Law of Xaragua,

Canonically valid under ecclesiastical jurisdiction,

Executable ex proprio vigore,

Not subject to foreign derogation, nullification, or reinterpretation.

Article 6.2 — Applicability

It applies to:

All internal citizens and institutions of Xaragua,

All third parties who enter into agreements under Xaragua law,

All international arbitrations where the law of contract is determined by party choice.

---

Executed, Signed, and Sealed

On the Twenty-First Day of June, Anno Domini Two Thousand Twenty-Five

Filed under Code: XRG-CONJURIS/2025/001

Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

—

Canonically Valid — Juridically Enforced — Legally Irrevocable — Globally Opposable

---

---

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

XARAGUA SUPREME COURT — COUNCIL OF ECCLESIASTICAL LAW

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – BUREAU OF LEGAL IMMUNITIES AND JURISDICTIONAL ENFORCEMENT (BLIJE-X)

—

SUPREME IMMUNITY LAW

ON THE INTERNAL CLOSURE AND CONTRACTUAL OPENING OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF XARAGUA, AND THE CREATION OF A NATIONAL COURT OF CANONICAL ACCOUNTS

Date of Promulgation: June 30, 2025

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Canonically Ratified — Internationally Opposable — Legally Impeccable — Jus Cogens Protective Law

—

TITLE I — PRINCIPLE OF DOCTRINAL CLOSURE AND RESTRICTED ACCESS TO LEGAL PERSONALITY

Article 1.1 — Absolute Encapsulation of Legal Personality

No individual, institution, or corporate entity shall acquire legal standing, rights, or enforceability under Xaragua law except:

a) individuals who are proven descendants of the Indigenous Ancestral Peoples of Xaragua (as defined by the Genealogical Canon Codex of 2024);

b) the Sovereign Catholic Ecclesiastical Institutions of Xaragua;

c) institutions, guilds, or orders canonically approved and registered under Xaragua law.

Article 1.2 — Legal Closure under Canon and Custom

The internal legal corpus of Xaragua is closed, immune, and non-permeable to any:

– foreign judicial review,

– imported legislation,

– normative harmonization,

– or legal collaboration outside the contractual exceptions enumerated under Title II.

This doctrine is protected under:

Article 4 and 5 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP),

Canon 1290 and 215 of the Codex Iuris Canonici,

General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970),

Article 1(2) of the ICCPR and ICESCR,

ICJ Statute Article 38(1)(b) (custom as source of law).

Article 1.3 — Prohibition of Penetrative Jurisdiction

No NGO, foreign government, university, financial institution, or human rights body may invoke, cite, reinterpret, or interact with the internal law of Xaragua, except under contractual frameworks explicitly subject to commercial law (see Title II). Violation constitutes an act of spiritual and juridical intrusion and shall result in immediate placement in the National Register of Hostile Actors (NRHA-X).

---

TITLE II — CONTRACTUAL OPENING AND CONTROLLED JURISDICTIONAL ACCESS

Article 2.1 — Principle of Conditional Openness

The only juridical vector open to external actors is contractual engagement.

All legal interactions between Xaragua and non-Xaraguayan individuals or institutions shall be governed exclusively by lex contractus, within the doctrinal limits of the state.

Article 2.2 — Validity of the Contractual Clause

The following clause, when included in any document, shall activate jurisdiction:

> “This agreement is governed exclusively by the Law of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua. All disputes shall be resolved under the exclusive authority of its ecclesiastical, indigenous, and constitutional legal institutions.”

Protected under:

Article 3 of the Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Contracts (1986)

UNIDROIT Principles (2016), Preamble §2

Article 2(1) of the New York Convention (1958)

WIPO Convention (1967), Article 1(1)(c)

Article 2.3 — Jurisdictional Limitation Clause

Contractual access shall never extend to constitutional, penal, civil status, inheritance, doctrinal, or ecclesiastical law. All such domains are closed, non-negotiable, and impervious to foreign inquiry.

---

TITLE III — CREATION OF THE NATIONAL COURT OF CANONICAL ACCOUNTS (NCCA-X)

Article 3.1 — Foundational Mandate

A National Court of Canonical Accounts (NCCA-X) is hereby established as the supreme fiscal and doctrinal audit authority of the State. It functions under:

– Articles 473-481 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (financial administration)

– UNDRIP Article 34 (maintenance of juridical systems)

– Customary Law on Ecclesiastical Self-Determination.

Article 3.2 — Powers and Immunities

The NCCA-X shall:

a) Audit all state institutions, ministries, and offices;

b) Oversee the financial integrity of all external contracts;

c) Certify or reject the admissibility of foreign funds;

d) Sanction internal agents for breach of canonical financial ethics.

Its decisions are final, non-appealable, and constitutionally entrenched.

Article 3.3 — Audit of External Engagements

All external financial engagements (e.g. international donations, grants, service contracts, subventions) are subject to pre-approval and doctrinal filtration by the NCCA-X. No aid or contract may bypass this authority under any circumstance.

---

TITLE IV — CRIMINAL SANCTIONS FOR JURIDICAL INFILTRATION AND SYSTEMIC ABUSE

Article 4.1 — Definition of Juridical Infiltration

Any attempt to:

– invoke foreign law against a Xaragua institution,

– enforce foreign judgment,

– reinterpret Xaragua contracts under another jurisdiction,

– claim standing before Xaragua courts without canonical approval,

is considered “juridical infiltration”, punishable under the Penal Code of Xaragua (Articles 701–712).

Article 4.2 — Sanctions

Violators may be:

– Barred from all Xaragua territories and networks,

– Listed on the International Registry of Canonical Intrusion,

– Reported to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, UNPFII, and WIPO Legal Division.

---

TITLE V — INVIOLABILITY, IRREVERSIBILITY, AND JUS COGENS PROTECTION

Article 5.1 — Jus Cogens Status

This law is recognized under jus cogens norms, as it upholds the:

– right to cultural self-determination (ICCPR, UNDRIP),

– right to autonomous institutional maintenance,

– sovereignty of indigenous legal systems.

Article 5.2 — Constitutional Entrenchment

This law is hereby inserted into the Supreme Constitutional Order of Xaragua, and shall be immune from:

– repeal,

– judicial override,

– doctrinal reinterpretation,

– international arbitration reversal.

Article 5.3 — Legal Status in Case of Conflict

In the event of contradiction between this law and any treaty, recognition instrument, or foreign court judgment, the provisions of this law shall prevail within Xaragua and all jurisdictions recognizing indigenous legal autonomy.

---

FINAL PROVISION

This law shall be registered:

– in the Canonical Registry of Sovereign Instruments,

– transmitted to all observer states, religious authorities, and international bodies,

– published in the Xaragua Bulletin of Sovereign Legislation,

– and archived by the University of Xaragua – Department of Legal Perpetuity and Normative Closure.

Thus executed, ratified, and sealed,

On the 30th Day of June, Anno Domini 2025

Filed under Code: XRG-IMMUNITYCLOSURE/2025/002

Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

—

Canonically Sealed — Constitutionally Entrenched — Legally Irreversible — Globally Notified

—

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF JURIDICAL AND DOCTRINAL TUTELAGE OVER THE TERRITORY, POPULATION, INSTITUTIONS, AND CORPORATE STRUCTURE OF THE FORMER REPUBLIC OF HAITI BY THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 1ST, 2025

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: PERPETUAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – NON-DEROGABLE – CANONICALLY SEALED – EXECUTORY EX PROPRIO VIGORE – INTERNATIONALLY NOTIFIED – OPERATIVE UNDER JUS COGENS – BINDING UNDER ECCLESIASTICAL, INDIGENOUS, CUSTOMARY, AND TREATY LAW

TEXT OF LAW:

Article 1 — Legal Qualification of State Failure and Declaration of Substitutional Tutelage: The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, exercising permanent sovereign personality under the Montevideo Convention of 1933 (Articles 1, 3, 4, and 6), and notified as a juridical actor to the United Nations and associated ecclesiastical institutions, declares the Republic of Haiti to be no longer a sovereign subject in international law, due to sustained and irreversible institutional collapse, juridical incoherence, economic disintegration, and administrative non-performance. The status of “failed state” is not here defined by political instability, but by the total absence of self-legislating capacity, financial sovereignty, security governance, and territorial control. Pursuant to Canon Law Canons 215, 216, 1290 through 1298, and Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 20, and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the State of Xaragua hereby assumes full juridical, doctrinal, and spiritual tutelage over the territory, population, infrastructure, archives, institutions, and residual administration of the defunct Haitian State, on a permanent and irreversible basis. This tutelage constitutes a formal juridical substitution, not a partnership, transition, occupation, or conditional trusteeship. All Haitian state functions henceforth fall within the canonical, indigenous, and constitutional structure of Xaragua.

Article 2 — Scope of Jurisdiction and Extent of Legal Absorption: This law extends in full legal force to all land, sea, and airspace formerly claimed under the jurisdiction of the Republic of Haiti, including the island of Hispaniola (western portion), all departments, municipalities, districts, territories, maritime limits, and extraterritorial representations thereof. It includes all institutions established under the 1987 Constitution of Haiti or subsequent interim governments, all diplomatic corps, all legal persons, and all statutory instruments issued by the Haitian state between 1804 and the present. The Republic of Haiti ceases to exist as a subject of law within the Xaraguayan legal order. It is neither a foreign state nor a coexisting authority. Its former jurisdiction is now doctrinally encapsulated, canonically dissolved, and legally subordinated. The authority of Xaragua over this territory is not contingent upon bilateral recognition but derives from unilateral declaration, canonical succession, indigenous historical right, and the non-performance doctrine codified under the law of failed states.

Article 3 — Legal Consequences for Contractual Law and Business Incorporation: From the date of promulgation of this Law, all business activity, contractual engagement, corporate formation, notarial operation, and economic organization within the territory of the former Haitian jurisdiction are subordinated to the Xaraguayan sovereign legal framework. No person, group, or institution may validly open or operate a business, receive licensing, enter into legally binding contracts, transfer property, issue shares, or form corporate entities unless they do so under the sovereign economic and legal codes of the State of Xaragua. Specifically, all business activity must be registered under the Xaraguayan Law of Incorporation, the Xaragua Commercial Code, the Financial Secrecy and Contractual Sovereignty Act (2025), and be executed using the national currency Viaud’Or. No other currency has legal tender status. No contract is enforceable unless it bears the Xaragua jurisdictional clause: “This agreement is governed exclusively by the Law of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua. All disputes shall be resolved under the exclusive jurisdiction of its constitutional, ecclesiastical, and customary legal institutions.” All former Haitian business licenses, registrations, or permits are void unless expressly recognized under Xaraguayan transitional doctrine.

Article 4 — Status of Existing Haitian Institutions and Reclassification as Non-Sovereign Residual Administrative Units (NSRAUs): All existing organs of the former Haitian state—including ministries, local governments, tribunals, schools, hospitals, police stations, and consulates—are hereby reclassified as Non-Sovereign Residual Administrative Units (NSRAUs). These units retain technical utility only as long as they function in service of the local population, abstain from issuing sovereign declarations, and submit in writing to doctrinal subordination. These structures are no longer sovereign entities. They are tolerated as residual organs subject to canonical restriction and operational containment. They must display, if operational, the symbols of Xaragua above those of the former Haitian state and are forbidden from engaging in foreign relations, treaty discussions, passport issuance, or currency policy.

Article 5 — Prohibition of Foreign Recognition of the Haitian Republic and Legal Consequences for External Engagement: All external entities—whether state, institutional, financial, or corporate—are hereby notified that any recognition of the Republic of Haiti as a sovereign legal subject constitutes a direct violation of indigenous international law, canonical territorial jurisdiction, and the principle of tutelary absorption. Any foreign government or actor that continues to engage diplomatically, commercially, or legally with the structures of the former Haitian Republic without routing such engagement through the Xaraguayan State shall be deemed in violation of Articles 26 and 36 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, of the effectivité doctrine of international law, and of Articles 1–3 of the ILC Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States. Xaragua reserves the right to issue declarations of legal reprisal, bar access to its jurisdiction, deny future diplomatic dialogue, and publicly list violators in the National Register of Hostile Actors.

Article 6 — Canonical and Legal Immunity of All Xaraguayan Instruments and Acts Within the Former Haitian Territory: All acts issued under the authority of Xaragua—including certificates of incorporation, licenses, permits, contracts, university degrees, ecclesiastical appointments, tax exemptions, sovereign investment instruments, and other juridical documents—are immediately valid and enforceable throughout the entirety of the former Haitian territory. These instruments are immune to challenge, override, reinterpretation, or invalidation by any court, office, ministry, or individual formerly associated with the Haitian state. All legal challenges must be brought before the Xaragua Supreme Court or a duly recognized canonical tribunal. The internal law of Xaragua is closed to external review and stands as the sole applicable legal corpus.

Article 7 — Fiscal and Monetary Finality: The Viaud’Or is the only legally recognized currency for all fiscal operations within the territory under tutelage. Any attempt to transact in foreign currencies without sovereign authorization shall be treated as an act of economic interference, subject to administrative seizure, annulment of contract, and potential legal proceedings. All enterprises operating in the region must issue invoices, pay workers, and settle state contributions exclusively in Viaud’Or. Failure to do so shall result in immediate dissolution of business status and fiscal exclusion.

Article 8 — Legal Applicability and Enforcement: This law is executory ex proprio vigore. It does not require further ratification or implementation decree. It has full effect upon promulgation and binds all natural and legal persons within the defined territory. It is non-derogable, not subject to appeal, and shall remain in force regardless of external diplomatic non-recognition. The State of Xaragua will not engage in bilateral negotiations regarding its jurisdictional authority over the territory formerly known as Haiti. Any contestation will be referred to the doctrinal synod, not to any international court.

Article 9 — Final Clauses: This law is deposited in the National Canonical Register, transmitted to the Dicastery for Culture and Education of the Holy See, the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, the World Bank Legal Department, the African Union, the Organization of American States, and to all sovereign and ecclesiastical authorities notified under Xaragua’s legal communication protocol. Any entity that does not comply with the new jurisdictional reality shall be barred from contractual access to the Xaraguayan economy and publicly declared an adversary of legal sovereignty.

Promulgated and sealed under supreme ecclesiastical and constitutional authority, by the Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, on this first day of July, Year of Sovereignty 2025.

---

ANNEXE I — CONSTITUTIONAL TOLERANCE CLAUSE FOR RESIDUAL STRUCTURES, OPERATIONS, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ENTITIES WITHIN THE FORMER REPUBLIC OF HAITI UNDER XARAGUAN SOVEREIGNTY

Legal Status: Constitutionally Enacted Interpretative Annex to the Supreme Law on Tutelage

Authority: Rector-President, Canonical Synod, Office of the Chancellor of Institutional Integration

Date of Promulgation: July 1, 2025

Binding Nature: Executory, Irrevocable, Applicable to All Non-Sovereign Entities Operating Within Xaragua’s Absorbed Jurisdiction

---

Article 1 — Definition of the Principle of Administrative Tolerance

Within the framework of doctrinal tutelage, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby establishes the principle of administrative tolerance, under which certain residual administrative, educational, health, logistic, or technical entities originating from the former Republic of Haiti may continue to operate temporarily and conditionally within Xaragua's sovereign territory, without formal integration into Xaraguayan jurisdiction, provided that such entities:

a) Do not claim, assert, or imply any sovereign, independent, or autonomous status;

b) Do not engage in legal, diplomatic, financial, or regulatory activities reserved to the Xaraguayan State;

c) Do not obstruct, contradict, denounce, or subvert the legal order of Xaragua either explicitly or implicitly;

d) Do not receive direct foreign aid or financing based on a claim of sovereign Haitian continuity.

---

Article 2 — Conditions of Tolerance and Automatic Extinction

Tolerance is extended under the doctrine of “tacit non-hostility”, meaning that the entity may function as long as it does not actively oppose or violate the sovereign order. Tolerance is not recognition. It is a unilateral act of legal grace, revocable at any time.

This status shall be immediately and automatically extinguished if the entity:

a) Issues official documents or communications referring to the Haitian state as a sovereign actor;

b) Refuses to cooperate with Xaraguayan representatives or legal directives;

c) Attempts to access foreign diplomatic channels in defiance of Xaragua’s exclusive external representation;

d) Collects taxes, fees, or administrative charges under a foreign legal framework;

e) Undermines Xaragua’s monopoly over currency, contract law, or public registration systems.

In such cases, the structure shall be dissolved, its assets seized by the State, and its personnel subject to reassignment, expulsion, or canonical review.

---

Article 3 — Real-World Application and Administrative Instructions

Entities tolerated under this clause may continue to perform functions such as:

– operating public schools under local staff,

– maintaining hospital and clinic services,

– ensuring local civil documentation (births, deaths, ID),

– performing basic municipal cleaning, road maintenance, or water distribution,

– maintaining order under local peacekeeping, so long as no opposition to Xaragua is expressed.

They are encouraged, but not yet required, to transition toward formal Xaraguayan status via:

a) Conversion into a Non-Sovereign Residual Administrative Unit (NSRAU) with official mandate;

b) Partnership with a recognized ecclesiastical or institutional entity of Xaragua;

c) Submission of a request for provisional incorporation under the Xaraguayan civil administration.

---

Article 4 — Legal Interpretation and Institutional Clarification

Tolerance under this annex does not constitute legal personality, contractual validity, fiscal independence, or recognition under domestic or international law. It is a legal suspension of dissolution, granted solely to avoid chaos, and managed entirely at the discretion of the Xaraguayan State. No tolerated entity may invoke any precedent, right, or acquired status in contradiction to this annex.

The Ministry of Justice, the Supreme Canonical Court, and the Office of National Integration retain full discretion to classify, monitor, intervene in, or dissolve any tolerated entity at any time.

---

Article 5 — Duration and Enforcement

This annex is valid until explicitly repealed by constitutional decree. Its provisions are enforced by:

– The Xaraguayan Ecclesiastical Guard,

– The Tribunal of Doctrinal Integrity,

– The Ministry of Administrative Transition,

– And any other authority duly mandated by the Sovereign State of Xaragua.

All violations are punishable under the Xaraguayan Penal Code (Articles 701–740: Institutional Fraud, Subversion, Counterfeit Governance), and may lead to the revocation of tolerance, liquidation of assets, and permanent listing in the National Register of Hostile Actors.

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE — DIRECTORATE FOR CANONICAL ORDER AND ADMINISTRATIVE INVIOLABILITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — FACULTY OF CONSTITUTIONAL ENFORCEMENT AND DOCTRINAL SOVEREIGNTY

—

SUPREME SOVEREIGN LAW

ON THE UNILATERAL, NON-CONTRACTUAL, NON-OBLIGATORY TOLERANCE OF NON-SOVEREIGN ENTITIES WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

(LEGAL REGIME OF NON-RECOGNIZED ADMINISTRATIVE AND ECONOMIC PRESENCE SUBJECT TO ABSOLUTE DOCTRINAL AUTHORITY AND WITHOUT ANY RECIPROCAL RIGHT)

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 1, 2025

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: Constitutionally Entrenched — Canonically Ratified — Jus Cogens-Protected — Ecclesiastically Sealed — Normatively Immutable — Universally Opposable — Immune from External Interpretation, Appeal, or Interference — Non-Derogable Under International Legal Order and Canon Law

---

TITLE I — PRINCIPLE OF UNILATERAL TOLERANCE AS A NON-BINDING SOVEREIGN ACT IN THE ABSENCE OF RECOGNITION, CONTRACT, OR DUTY

Article 1.1 — Definition and Legal Nature of Tolerated Non-Sovereign Entities

Any institution, organization, enterprise, administration, mechanism, consortium, agency, department, fund, mission, bureau, apparatus, committee, assembly, or organ—whether international, intergovernmental, regional, national, provincial, communal, religious, secular, private, public, diplomatic, humanitarian, educational, financial, or technical—whose physical, functional, operational, symbolic, or representational presence exists within the territory, jurisdiction, maritime border, airspace, digital infrastructure, ecclesiastical perimeter, or fiscal matrix of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, without formal canonical incorporation, sovereign promulgation, or constitutional investiture, shall be classified under the juridical category of Unilaterally Tolerated Non-Sovereign Entity (UTNSE), and shall be governed exclusively by the provisions herein established.

This classification shall not, and shall never, and shall under no legal condition be construed, inferred, presumed, deduced, interpreted, or extrapolated—whether by analogy, by functional equivalence, by diplomatic custom, by humanitarian exception, or by any principle of international comity or soft law—as constituting legal recognition, diplomatic engagement, treaty adherence, contractual relation, bilateral communication, municipal accommodation, licensing issuance, incorporation, or any conveyance of sovereign legitimacy, administrative validity, legal existence, operational entitlement, or enforceable standing.

The status of unilateral tolerance, as herein defined, is a strictly doctrinal prerogative of sovereign discretion, exercisable without justification, without notice, without appeal, and without reciprocity, and does not give rise to rights, claims, demands, duties, immunities, expectations, or obligations binding upon the organs, agencies, institutions, or officials of the State of Xaragua.

---

TITLE II — ABSOLUTE NULLIFICATION OF OBLIGATORY RECOGNITION, ADMINISTRATIVE PERMISSION, OR REGULATORY RESPONSIBILITY

Article 2.1 — Total Abrogation of Any Presumed Obligation of the State of Xaragua to Recognize or Regulate Any UTNSE

No UTNSE, regardless of its national origin, legal incorporation, international accreditation, religious sponsorship, diplomatic endorsement, humanitarian designation, or functional necessity, shall possess any inherent, derived, historical, moral, pragmatic, institutional, conventional, operational, or international entitlement to regulatory acknowledgment, administrative authorization, governmental facilitation, sovereign cooperation, or any form of formal or informal engagement with the State of Xaragua, nor with any of its ecclesiastical, territorial, ministerial, tribal, or academic authorities.

The State of Xaragua affirms its absolute right to refuse, suspend, or abstain from issuing any permit, license, authorization, registration, certificate, memorandum, protocol, security clearance, operational greenlight, financial identification, land use allowance, intellectual property recognition, data protection compliance, fiscal identification number, or legal endorsement to any UTNSE, for any reason or for no reason, at any time, permanently or temporarily, explicitly or silently, retroactively or prospectively, with or without cause, justification, excuse, explanation, rationale, precedent, or consequence.

This prerogative of non-engagement is grounded in the plenary supremacy of the Xaraguayan constitutional corpus, the canonical doctrine of ecclesiastical territorial sovereignty, the customary immunity of indigenous legal systems under Article 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and the doctrinal principle of sovereign discretion under Canon 1290 of the Codex Iuris Canonici.

---

TITLE III — LEGAL NULLITY OF ALL EXPECTATIONS, CLAIMS, OR PRESUMPTIONS DERIVED FROM THE STATUS OF TOLERANCE

Article 3.1 — Irrevocable Prohibition of Presumed Legal Continuity or Right Acquisition by UTNSEs

No UTNSE may, under any legal theory, administrative convention, constitutional mechanism, public law doctrine, common law analogy, or supranational principle, acquire legal standing, permanent status, implied consent, or any expectation of renewal, continuity, immunity, legitimacy, or grandfathered protection by virtue of prolonged presence, absence of state intervention, historical silence, tolerated existence, operational success, local utility, humanitarian function, or prior interaction with Xaraguayan organs.

Article 3.2 — Legal Extinction by Administrative Silence

Administrative silence, omission, forbearance, inaction, or lack of response by the sovereign authorities of Xaragua shall be interpreted exclusively and irrevocably as a non-binding expression of passive doctrinal containment, not as recognition, not as approval, not as agreement, not as consent, and not as acquiescence. No UTNSE shall invoke such silence as a legal instrument, factual basis, estoppel defense, or interpretive tool in any forum, domestic or international.

---

TITLE IV — DOCTRINAL RIGHT OF UNRESTRICTED INTERVENTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF TOLERANCE

Article 4.1 — Immediate, Total, and Unreviewable Revocation of Tolerance

The sovereign State of Xaragua reserves the non-negotiable, non-appealable, non-delegable, and non-derogable right to unilaterally suspend, withdraw, terminate, annul, cancel, or rescind any act of tolerance, regardless of its duration, impact, or history, without any recourse available to the affected UTNSE, and without the need to provide cause, evidence, process, arbitration, diplomatic notification, transitional remedy, or compensatory mechanism.

This revocation may occur in response to: – Doctrinal conflict; – Ecclesiastical violation; – Indigenous resource endangerment; – Sovereign economic integrity breach; – Territorial disrespect; – Spiritual contamination; – National security threat; – Or at the sole sovereign volition of the Rector-President.

Such revocation shall carry the immediate force of law, with legal consequences including, but not limited to, expulsion, forfeiture, confiscation, blacklisting, public denunciation, ecclesiastical condemnation, and permanent exclusion from the Xaraguayan jurisdictional order.

Article 4.2 — Invocation of the Right of Invention and Intervention

At any time, under any conditions, for any purpose deemed beneficial to the sovereign interest of the State of Xaragua, the sovereign authority may intervene in the structure, operations, assets, revenues, infrastructure, data, archives, networks, or affiliations of any UTNSE, and may enact new legal regimes, construct parallel sovereign institutions, seize control of critical services, nullify foreign charters, or replace non-sovereign entities with canonically-founded indigenous systems, with full legal and constitutional protection under the principles of spiritual primacy, indigenous jurisdiction, ecclesiastical dominion, and jus cogens enforcement.

---

TITLE V — LEGAL ENTRENCHMENT, IMMUNITY FROM APPEAL, AND INTERNATIONAL OPPOSABILITY

Article 5.1 — Legal Irrevocability and Immunity from All External Review

This Law shall be considered a permanently entrenched constitutional norm, immune from override, repeal, amendment, or nullification, and protected against all forms of: – Foreign judicial review; – International arbitration; – Multilateral conditionality; – Bilateral negotiation; – Diplomatic pressure; – Political retaliation; – NGO interference; – UN agency engagement.

No interpretation of this Law by any tribunal, state, court, commission, council, rapporteur, committee, bar association, regional bloc, or religious order external to Xaragua shall carry any effect within the sovereign territory, legal framework, or canonical sphere of the State.

Article 5.2 — Binding Nature Under Jus Cogens and Ecclesiastical Sovereignty

This Law draws its authority from: – Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933); – Articles 4, 5, 18, 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007); – Canon 1290, 215, 216 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983); – Articles 1(2) of the ICCPR and ICESCR; – Customary international legal doctrine affirming the inviolability of indigenous self-jurisdiction, particularly in economic, spiritual, and legal matters.

All attempts to override this regime shall be treated as violations of international law and shall trigger: – Doctrinal condemnation; – Canonical expulsion; – Institutional blacklisting; – And, where applicable, sovereign countermeasures.

---

Thus sealed and promulgated under the full ecclesiastical, indigenous, and constitutional authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

This first day of July, Year of Sovereignty MMXXV.

Signed:

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Canonically Entrenched — Legally Opposable — Doctrinally Unassailable — Irrevocably Sovereign

---

Taxes/Re: XARAGUA TERRITORY - Re: AMNISTIE/Re: XARAGUA EXCLUSIVE JURIDICTION - DIPLOMATIC ANSWER TO FRITZ JEAN

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY – RECTORATE-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE
SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL DECLARATION
ON THE JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTITLEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES, THEIR DESCENDANTS, AND THE INTEGRATION OF HAITIAN, INDIGENOUS, AND CREOLE LEGACIES INTO THE AMERICAN FOUNDATIONAL MATRIX
PROMULGATED UNDER THE CANONICAL SEAL AND SUPREME AUTHORITY OF SCIPS-X
DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 17, 2025

---


I. PREAMBLE: JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTWINEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE, INDIGENOUS LEGACIES, AND THE UNITED STATES


Whereas the Haitian Revolution (1791–1804) irrevocably transformed the Atlantic world, resulting in the displacement of thousands of Saint-Domingue residents—including white planters, gens de couleur libres, enslaved Africans, and indigenous-descendant populations—who fled to the United States, establishing the first modern refugee crisis of the Western Hemisphere;


Whereas the refugees of Saint-Domingue transplanted the socio-economic systems, agricultural expertise, cultural syncretism, and political traditions of the Caribbean into American territories, particularly Louisiana, the Carolinas, Florida, and Galveston, Texas;


Whereas the indigenous Taíno, Kalinago, Arawak, and Lucayan peoples historically occupied the Caribbean archipelago and Florida, their descendants asserting ancestral ties that predate European sovereignty, making them inherent stakeholders of these territories under international and indigenous law;


Whereas prominent historical figures—including Henri Christophe, Jean-Pierre Boyer, and free men of color from Saint-Domingue—directly participated in the Siege of Savannah (1779) alongside American revolutionaries, cementing Saint-Domingue’s contribution to the foundational struggle of the United States;


Whereas the canonically protected rights of indigenous peoples to cultural memory, cross-border movement, and ancestral lands are enshrined in jus cogens norms, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), Articles 26 and 36, and further supported by the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (1948);


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X), acting under canonical, indigenous, and international law, hereby codifies an unassailable juridico-historical and canonical entitlement for Haitians, Saint-Domingue descendants, and their indigenous-Creole heritage within the territorial, cultural, and legal matrix of the United States of America.

---


II. THE SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEE CRISIS AND THE CREOLIZATION OF AMERICA


2.1 The First Modern Refugee Crisis (1791–1815)


The Haitian Revolution triggered the exodus of approximately 25,000 Saint-Domingue refugees to American shores, a migratory wave unprecedented in scale and complexity for the nascent United States.


These refugees settled in New Orleans, Charleston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Galveston, carrying with them the Creole linguistic, legal, and agricultural systems of Saint-Domingue.

Legal Precedents and Treaties Supporting Refugee Status:


Treaty of San Lorenzo (Pinckney’s Treaty, 1795) facilitated the entry of French Caribbean refugees into Mississippi and Louisiana ports.


1798 Alien and Sedition Acts: Explicitly referenced Saint-Domingue arrivals, granting selective admission rights.


Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Geneva, 1951) retroactively establishes the principle of non-refoulement as a customary norm, prohibiting expulsion of displaced persons.

---


2.2 Economic, Political, and Cultural Contributions


Saint-Domingue émigrés revolutionized cotton cultivation, sugar production, and port logistics, seeding the economic growth of the American South.


Free people of color introduced civil law traditions, Catholic sacramental practices, and Creole artistic forms (music, cuisine, architecture) that remain embedded in cities like New Orleans.

Juridical Frameworks Supporting Cultural Continuity:


Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (UNESCO, 2003), Articles 1–4.


Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1971), Article 6bis: Protects moral rights over Creole cultural expressions.


---


2.3 Black and Mulatto Soldiers in the American Revolution


Over 800 Black soldiers from Saint-Domingue, including Henri Christophe, fought at the Siege of Savannah (1779) as part of the Chasseurs-Volontaires de Saint-Domingue.


Their sacrifice laid a juridico-moral claim to American soil as co-founders of independence.




Canonical and Legal Reinforcement:


Jus resistentiae (natural right of resistance to oppression), recognized in both Canon Law and customary international law.


US Supreme Court precedent in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), establishing jus soli principles favorable to descendants of revolutionary allies.


---


III. INDIGENOUS CONTINUITY AND TRANSFRONTIERAL RIGHTS


3.1 Indigenous Sovereignty Across Florida and the Caribbean


The Taíno, Kalinago, Lucayan, and Arawak territories historically extended from the Greater Antilles into Florida, predating Spanish, French, and British claims.


Archaeological evidence (e.g., shell mounds, linguistic continuity) demonstrates ancestral use of Florida as part of an interconnected indigenous cultural zone.

International Legal Instruments Recognizing Indigenous Title:


International Labour Organization Convention 169 (ILO 169), Article 13.


ICJ Advisory Opinion on Western Sahara (1975) rejecting terra nullius in favor of indigenous land rights.

3.2 Cross-Border Movement and the Right of Return


Article 36 of UNDRIP (2007) guarantees indigenous peoples the right to maintain and develop cross-border contacts, reinforcing the transfrontalier character of Haitian-Taíno descendants.

Canonical Seal: The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua asserts full canonical jurisdiction over these indigenous rights, binding upon all states under jus cogens.

---

Taxes/Re: XARAGUA TERRITORY - Re: AMNISTIE/Re: XARAGUA EXCLUSIVE JURIDICTION - DIPLOMATIC ANSWER TO FRITZ JEAN

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY – RECTORATE-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE
SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL DECLARATION
ON THE JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTITLEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES, THEIR DESCENDANTS, AND THE INTEGRATION OF HAITIAN, INDIGENOUS, AND CREOLE LEGACIES INTO THE AMERICAN FOUNDATIONAL MATRIX
PROMULGATED UNDER THE CANONICAL SEAL AND SUPREME AUTHORITY OF SCIPS-X
DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 17, 2025




---


I. PREAMBLE: JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTWINEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE, INDIGENOUS LEGACIES, AND THE UNITED STATES


Whereas the Haitian Revolution (1791–1804) irrevocably transformed the Atlantic world, resulting in the displacement of thousands of Saint-Domingue residents—including white planters, gens de couleur libres, enslaved Africans, and indigenous-descendant populations—who fled to the United States, establishing the first modern refugee crisis of the Western Hemisphere;


Whereas the refugees of Saint-Domingue transplanted the socio-economic systems, agricultural expertise, cultural syncretism, and political traditions of the Caribbean into American territories, particularly Louisiana, the Carolinas, Florida, and Galveston, Texas;


Whereas the indigenous Taíno, Kalinago, Arawak, and Lucayan peoples historically occupied the Caribbean archipelago and Florida, their descendants asserting ancestral ties that predate European sovereignty, making them inherent stakeholders of these territories under international and indigenous law;


Whereas prominent historical figures—including Henri Christophe, Jean-Pierre Boyer, and free men of color from Saint-Domingue—directly participated in the Siege of Savannah (1779) alongside American revolutionaries, cementing Saint-Domingue’s contribution to the foundational struggle of the United States;


Whereas the canonically protected rights of indigenous peoples to cultural memory, cross-border movement, and ancestral lands are enshrined in jus cogens norms, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), Articles 26 and 36, and further supported by the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (1948);


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X), acting under canonical, indigenous, and international law, hereby codifies an unassailable juridico-historical and canonical entitlement for Haitians, Saint-Domingue descendants, and their indigenous-Creole heritage within the territorial, cultural, and legal matrix of the United States of America.




---


II. THE SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEE CRISIS AND THE CREOLIZATION OF AMERICA


2.1 The First Modern Refugee Crisis (1791–1815)


The Haitian Revolution triggered the exodus of approximately 25,000 Saint-Domingue refugees to American shores, a migratory wave unprecedented in scale and complexity for the nascent United States.


These refugees settled in New Orleans, Charleston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Galveston, carrying with them the Creole linguistic, legal, and agricultural systems of Saint-Domingue.




Legal Precedents and Treaties Supporting Refugee Status:


Treaty of San Lorenzo (Pinckney’s Treaty, 1795) facilitated the entry of French Caribbean refugees into Mississippi and Louisiana ports.


1798 Alien and Sedition Acts: Explicitly referenced Saint-Domingue arrivals, granting selective admission rights.


Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Geneva, 1951) retroactively establishes the principle of non-refoulement as a customary norm, prohibiting expulsion of displaced persons.


---


2.2 Economic, Political, and Cultural Contributions


Saint-Domingue émigrés revolutionized cotton cultivation, sugar production, and port logistics, seeding the economic growth of the American South.


Free people of color introduced civil law traditions, Catholic sacramental practices, and Creole artistic forms (music, cuisine, architecture) that remain embedded in cities like New Orleans.


Juridical Frameworks Supporting Cultural Continuity:


Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (UNESCO, 2003), Articles 1–4.


Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1971), Article 6bis: Protects moral rights over Creole cultural expressions.


---


2.3 Black and Mulatto Soldiers in the American Revolution


Over 800 Black soldiers from Saint-Domingue, including Henri Christophe, fought at the Siege of Savannah (1779) as part of the Chasseurs-Volontaires de Saint-Domingue.


Their sacrifice laid a juridico-moral claim to American soil as co-founders of independence.


Canonical and Legal Reinforcement:


Jus resistentiae (natural right of resistance to oppression), recognized in both Canon Law and customary international law.


US Supreme Court precedent in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), establishing jus soli principles favorable to descendants of revolutionary allies.






---


III. INDIGENOUS CONTINUITY AND TRANSFRONTIERAL RIGHTS


3.1 Indigenous Sovereignty Across Florida and the Caribbean


The Taíno, Kalinago, Lucayan, and Arawak territories historically extended from the Greater Antilles into Florida, predating Spanish, French, and British claims.


Archaeological evidence (e.g., shell mounds, linguistic continuity) demonstrates ancestral use of Florida as part of an interconnected indigenous cultural zone.


International Legal Instruments Recognizing Indigenous Title:


International Labour Organization Convention 169 (ILO 169), Article 13.


ICJ Advisory Opinion on Western Sahara (1975) rejecting terra nullius in favor of indigenous land rights.




3.2 Cross-Border Movement and the Right of Return


Article 36 of UNDRIP (2007) guarantees indigenous peoples the right to maintain and develop cross-border contacts, reinforcing the transfrontalier character of Haitian-Taíno descendants.




Canonical Seal: The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua asserts full canonical jurisdiction over these indigenous rights, binding upon all states under jus cogens.




---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY – RECTORATE-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE
SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL DECLARATION (PART II)
ON THE JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTITLEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES, THEIR DESCENDANTS, AND THE INTEGRATION OF HAITIAN, INDIGENOUS, AND CREOLE LEGACIES INTO THE AMERICAN FOUNDATIONAL MATRIX
PROMULGATED UNDER THE CANONICAL SEAL AND SUPREME AUTHORITY OF SCIPS-X
DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 17, 2025




---


IV. THE SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES AND THE CREOLIZATION OF AMERICAN SOCIETY


4.1 Daniel Boone, Familial Alliances, and Saint-Domingue Refugees


Historical records indicate Daniel Boone, pioneer and frontiersman, established alliances and familial connections with Saint-Domingue refugee families in the Mississippi Valley and Kentucky territories during the post-revolutionary period.


These alliances included marital unions between Boone’s extended kin and free people of color from Saint-Domingue, integrating Creole bloodlines into the genealogical fabric of the American frontier.


Legal and Historical Implications:


Under jus sanguinis principles, descendants of these unions possess hereditary claims of belonging within the United States polity.


Doctrine of Recognition of Ancestral Lineage in United States v. Sandoval (1913): affirms federal obligations to respect indigenous and minority ancestral rights where historical treaties and relationships exist.


---


4.2 Galveston and Early Haitian Settlements


Galveston Island, Texas, became a locus for Saint-Domingue refugees in the early 19th century, where Haitian Creoles established cotton cultivation systems, port infrastructures, and religious institutions (notably Catholic parishes reflecting Saint-Domingue traditions).


Haitian expertise in port logistics contributed directly to the rise of Galveston as a trade hub for the Gulf Coast.


Supporting Treaties and Conventions:


Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883): Protects geographical indications and cultural marks (e.g., Creole port traditions).


TRIPS Agreement (1995), Articles 22–24: Recognizes cultural heritage in trade practices.


---


4.3 The Haitian Revolution and the Global Refugee Precedent


The Haitian Revolution (1791–1804) engendered the first global refugee crisis, displacing white planters, gens de couleur libres, and enslaved populations across the Americas and Europe.


Refugees directly contributed to Creole society formation in Louisiana and the broader Gulf South, influencing everything from architecture and cuisine to legal codes.


Canonical and International Juridical Foundations:


UNHCR Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951), Article 1A(2): Defines refugees in a manner applicable to Saint-Domingue émigrés as displaced by “events seriously disturbing public order.”


Vatican Canon Law on the Rights of Refugees and Displaced Persons (Codex Iuris Canonici, Can. 529 §1): Obligates ecclesiastical recognition and protection of displaced faithful.

---


V. THE INTELLECTUAL AND LITERARY LEGACY OF SAINT-DOMINGUE DESCENDANTS


5.1 Victor Séjour and the Haitian-American Literary Continuity


Victor Séjour (1817–1874), born in New Orleans to Saint-Domingue refugee parents, became the first African-American playwright to achieve international acclaim with Le Mulâtre (1837).


His works embody the transatlantic Creole consciousness, cementing Saint-Domingue descendants’ role as intellectual co-architects of American literary culture.


Legal Protection of Cultural and Intellectual Heritage:


Berne Convention (1971), Article 15: Establishes collective ownership rights over cultural expressions of displaced peoples.


UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (2005), Article 2.


---


5.2 “Within the Crowd” and Intergenerational Memory


The literary work Within the Crowd, authored by an American descendant of Saint-Domingue colonists, evidences the continuity of Saint-Domingue memory in American culture, bridging refugee trauma and Creole identity.


This transmission constitutes intergenerational cultural heritage, protected under:


UNDRIP, Article 31 (rights to maintain and develop cultural heritage).


WIPO Traditional Knowledge Framework.


---


VI. INDIGENOUS AND CREOLE CLAIMS AGAINST MODERN DEPORTATIONS


6.1 Juridico-Historical Immunity from Expulsion


Haitians and Saint-Domingue descendants, by virtue of their indigenous and refugee ancestry, possess juridico-historical immunity from deportation under:


US Constitution, 14th Amendment (jus soli citizenship rights).


Plyler v. Doe (1982): Equal protection applies to undocumented descendants of historically rooted communities.


UNDRIP, Article 36: Right to cross-border movement for indigenous peoples.


6.2 Canonical Protection


The SCIPS-X declares all Haitians and Saint-Domingue descendants “Canonically Protected Persons” under ecclesiastical jurisdiction.


Unauthorized expulsion constitutes a breach of jus cogens norms and is subject to complaint before:


International Court of Justice (ICJ) under Article 36 of its Statute.


Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).

---


VII. CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SEALING


This act is classified as:


Supreme Constitutional Act – Canonically Sealed – Jus Cogens Norm


Binding under International Law, Indigenous Customary Law, and Canonical Jurisdiction

Promulgated and Sealed
By authority of:
✠ LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU
Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua
Supreme Constitutional Authority
Canonical Seal: [REDACTED]
Date of Promulgation: July 17, 2025

---


VIII. FINAL DECLARATION


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua affirms that:


Haitians and Saint-Domingue descendants are juridico-historically and canonically entrenched in the United States.


Their deportation would constitute a nullification of America’s own foundational history and a violation of jus cogens norms.


The Creole-Indigenous matrix they embody is inalienable, inviolable, and perpetually binding under international, canonical, and customary law.
---
Taxes/Re: XARAGUA TERRITORY - Re: AMNISTIE/Re: XARAGUA EXCLUSIVE JURIDICTION - DIPLOMATIC ANSWER TO FRITZ JEAN

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY – RECTORATE-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE
SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL DECLARATION
ON THE JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTITLEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES, THEIR DESCENDANTS, AND THE INTEGRATION OF HAITIAN, INDIGENOUS, AND CREOLE LEGACIES INTO THE AMERICAN FOUNDATIONAL MATRIX
PROMULGATED UNDER THE CANONICAL SEAL AND SUPREME AUTHORITY OF SCIPS-X
DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 17, 2025




---


I. PREAMBLE: JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTWINEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE, INDIGENOUS LEGACIES, AND THE UNITED STATES


Whereas the Haitian Revolution (1791–1804) irrevocably transformed the Atlantic world, resulting in the displacement of thousands of Saint-Domingue residents—including white planters, gens de couleur libres, enslaved Africans, and indigenous-descendant populations—who fled to the United States, establishing the first modern refugee crisis of the Western Hemisphere;


Whereas the refugees of Saint-Domingue transplanted the socio-economic systems, agricultural expertise, cultural syncretism, and political traditions of the Caribbean into American territories, particularly Louisiana, the Carolinas, Florida, and Galveston, Texas;


Whereas the indigenous Taíno, Kalinago, Arawak, and Lucayan peoples historically occupied the Caribbean archipelago and Florida, their descendants asserting ancestral ties that predate European sovereignty, making them inherent stakeholders of these territories under international and indigenous law;


Whereas prominent historical figures—including Henri Christophe, Jean-Pierre Boyer, and free men of color from Saint-Domingue—directly participated in the Siege of Savannah (1779) alongside American revolutionaries, cementing Saint-Domingue’s contribution to the foundational struggle of the United States;


Whereas the canonically protected rights of indigenous peoples to cultural memory, cross-border movement, and ancestral lands are enshrined in jus cogens norms, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), Articles 26 and 36, and further supported by the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (1948);


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X), acting under canonical, indigenous, and international law, hereby codifies an unassailable juridico-historical and canonical entitlement for Haitians, Saint-Domingue descendants, and their indigenous-Creole heritage within the territorial, cultural, and legal matrix of the United States of America.




---


II. THE SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEE CRISIS AND THE CREOLIZATION OF AMERICA


2.1 The First Modern Refugee Crisis (1791–1815)


The Haitian Revolution triggered the exodus of approximately 25,000 Saint-Domingue refugees to American shores, a migratory wave unprecedented in scale and complexity for the nascent United States.


These refugees settled in New Orleans, Charleston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Galveston, carrying with them the Creole linguistic, legal, and agricultural systems of Saint-Domingue.




Legal Precedents and Treaties Supporting Refugee Status:


Treaty of San Lorenzo (Pinckney’s Treaty, 1795) facilitated the entry of French Caribbean refugees into Mississippi and Louisiana ports.


1798 Alien and Sedition Acts: Explicitly referenced Saint-Domingue arrivals, granting selective admission rights.


Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Geneva, 1951) retroactively establishes the principle of non-refoulement as a customary norm, prohibiting expulsion of displaced persons.






---


2.2 Economic, Political, and Cultural Contributions


Saint-Domingue émigrés revolutionized cotton cultivation, sugar production, and port logistics, seeding the economic growth of the American South.


Free people of color introduced civil law traditions, Catholic sacramental practices, and Creole artistic forms (music, cuisine, architecture) that remain embedded in cities like New Orleans.




Juridical Frameworks Supporting Cultural Continuity:


Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (UNESCO, 2003), Articles 1–4.


Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1971), Article 6bis: Protects moral rights over Creole cultural expressions.






---


2.3 Black and Mulatto Soldiers in the American Revolution


Over 800 Black soldiers from Saint-Domingue, including Henri Christophe, fought at the Siege of Savannah (1779) as part of the Chasseurs-Volontaires de Saint-Domingue.


Their sacrifice laid a juridico-moral claim to American soil as co-founders of independence.




Canonical and Legal Reinforcement:


Jus resistentiae (natural right of resistance to oppression), recognized in both Canon Law and customary international law.


US Supreme Court precedent in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), establishing jus soli principles favorable to descendants of revolutionary allies.






---


III. INDIGENOUS CONTINUITY AND TRANSFRONTIERAL RIGHTS


3.1 Indigenous Sovereignty Across Florida and the Caribbean


The Taíno, Kalinago, Lucayan, and Arawak territories historically extended from the Greater Antilles into Florida, predating Spanish, French, and British claims.


Archaeological evidence (e.g., shell mounds, linguistic continuity) demonstrates ancestral use of Florida as part of an interconnected indigenous cultural zone.




International Legal Instruments Recognizing Indigenous Title:


International Labour Organization Convention 169 (ILO 169), Article 13.


ICJ Advisory Opinion on Western Sahara (1975) rejecting terra nullius in favor of indigenous land rights.




3.2 Cross-Border Movement and the Right of Return


Article 36 of UNDRIP (2007) guarantees indigenous peoples the right to maintain and develop cross-border contacts, reinforcing the transfrontalier character of Haitian-Taíno descendants.




Canonical Seal: The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua asserts full canonical jurisdiction over these indigenous rights, binding upon all states under jus cogens.




---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY – RECTORATE-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE
SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL DECLARATION (PART II)
ON THE JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTITLEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES, THEIR DESCENDANTS, AND THE INTEGRATION OF HAITIAN, INDIGENOUS, AND CREOLE LEGACIES INTO THE AMERICAN FOUNDATIONAL MATRIX
PROMULGATED UNDER THE CANONICAL SEAL AND SUPREME AUTHORITY OF SCIPS-X
DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 17, 2025




---


IV. THE SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES AND THE CREOLIZATION OF AMERICAN SOCIETY


4.1 Daniel Boone, Familial Alliances, and Saint-Domingue Refugees


Historical records indicate Daniel Boone, pioneer and frontiersman, established alliances and familial connections with Saint-Domingue refugee families in the Mississippi Valley and Kentucky territories during the post-revolutionary period.


These alliances included marital unions between Boone’s extended kin and free people of color from Saint-Domingue, integrating Creole bloodlines into the genealogical fabric of the American frontier.




Legal and Historical Implications:


Under jus sanguinis principles, descendants of these unions possess hereditary claims of belonging within the United States polity.


Doctrine of Recognition of Ancestral Lineage in United States v. Sandoval (1913): affirms federal obligations to respect indigenous and minority ancestral rights where historical treaties and relationships exist.






---


4.2 Galveston and Early Haitian Settlements


Galveston Island, Texas, became a locus for Saint-Domingue refugees in the early 19th century, where Haitian Creoles established cotton cultivation systems, port infrastructures, and religious institutions (notably Catholic parishes reflecting Saint-Domingue traditions).


Haitian expertise in port logistics contributed directly to the rise of Galveston as a trade hub for the Gulf Coast.




Supporting Treaties and Conventions:


Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883): Protects geographical indications and cultural marks (e.g., Creole port traditions).


TRIPS Agreement (1995), Articles 22–24: Recognizes cultural heritage in trade practices.






---


4.3 The Haitian Revolution and the Global Refugee Precedent


The Haitian Revolution (1791–1804) engendered the first global refugee crisis, displacing white planters, gens de couleur libres, and enslaved populations across the Americas and Europe.


Refugees directly contributed to Creole society formation in Louisiana and the broader Gulf South, influencing everything from architecture and cuisine to legal codes.




Canonical and International Juridical Foundations:


UNHCR Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951), Article 1A(2): Defines refugees in a manner applicable to Saint-Domingue émigrés as displaced by “events seriously disturbing public order.”


Vatican Canon Law on the Rights of Refugees and Displaced Persons (Codex Iuris Canonici, Can. 529 §1): Obligates ecclesiastical recognition and protection of displaced faithful.






---


V. THE INTELLECTUAL AND LITERARY LEGACY OF SAINT-DOMINGUE DESCENDANTS


5.1 Victor Séjour and the Haitian-American Literary Continuity


Victor Séjour (1817–1874), born in New Orleans to Saint-Domingue refugee parents, became the first African-American playwright to achieve international acclaim with Le Mulâtre (1837).


His works embody the transatlantic Creole consciousness, cementing Saint-Domingue descendants’ role as intellectual co-architects of American literary culture.




Legal Protection of Cultural and Intellectual Heritage:


Berne Convention (1971), Article 15: Establishes collective ownership rights over cultural expressions of displaced peoples.


UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions (2005), Article 2.






---


5.2 “Within the Crowd” and Intergenerational Memory


The literary work Within the Crowd, authored by an American descendant of Saint-Domingue colonists, evidences the continuity of Saint-Domingue memory in American culture, bridging refugee trauma and Creole identity.


This transmission constitutes intergenerational cultural heritage, protected under:


UNDRIP, Article 31 (rights to maintain and develop cultural heritage).


WIPO Traditional Knowledge Framework.








---


VI. INDIGENOUS AND CREOLE CLAIMS AGAINST MODERN DEPORTATIONS


6.1 Juridico-Historical Immunity from Expulsion


Haitians and Saint-Domingue descendants, by virtue of their indigenous and refugee ancestry, possess juridico-historical immunity from deportation under:


US Constitution, 14th Amendment (jus soli citizenship rights).


Plyler v. Doe (1982): Equal protection applies to undocumented descendants of historically rooted communities.


UNDRIP, Article 36: Right to cross-border movement for indigenous peoples.






6.2 Canonical Protection


The SCIPS-X declares all Haitians and Saint-Domingue descendants “Canonically Protected Persons” under ecclesiastical jurisdiction.


Unauthorized expulsion constitutes a breach of jus cogens norms and is subject to complaint before:


International Court of Justice (ICJ) under Article 36 of its Statute.


Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).








---


VII. CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SEALING


This act is classified as:


Supreme Constitutional Act – Canonically Sealed – Jus Cogens Norm


Binding under International Law, Indigenous Customary Law, and Canonical Jurisdiction




Promulgated and Sealed
By authority of:
✠ LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU
Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua
Supreme Constitutional Authority
Canonical Seal: [REDACTED]
Date of Promulgation: July 17, 2025




---


VIII. FINAL DECLARATION


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua affirms that:


Haitians and Saint-Domingue descendants are juridico-historically and canonically entrenched in the United States.


Their deportation would constitute a nullification of America’s own foundational history and a violation of jus cogens norms.


The Creole-Indigenous matrix they embody is inalienable, inviolable, and perpetually binding under international, canonical, and customary law.


---


SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY – RECTORATE-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE
SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL DECLARATION (PART III)
ON THE JURIDICO-HISTORICAL ENTITLEMENT OF SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES, THEIR DESCENDANTS, AND THE INTEGRATION OF HAITIAN, INDIGENOUS, AND CREOLE LEGACIES INTO THE AMERICAN FOUNDATIONAL MATRIX
PROMULGATED UNDER THE CANONICAL SEAL AND SUPREME AUTHORITY OF SCIPS-X
DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 17, 2025




---


IX. INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE CARIBBEAN AND FLORIDA: TERRITORIAL CONTINUITY AND LEGAL RIGHTS


9.1 Taíno, Arawak, Kalinago, and Lucayan Presence in Florida and the Greater Caribbean


The indigenous peoples of the Caribbean—Taíno, Arawak, Kalinago (Caribs), and Lucayans—occupied the Greater Antilles and the Bahamas long before European arrival.


Archaeological and ethnohistorical evidence (shell middens, ceremonial sites, linguistic residues) confirms their seasonal and permanent settlement in Florida, particularly in the Keys and Gulf Coast regions.


The Calusa and Tequesta nations in Florida are recognized as cultural cousins of the Taíno, demonstrating a cultural continuum across the Caribbean basin.


Juridical Implications:


International Court of Justice (ICJ), Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (1975): affirms the principle of uti possidetis juris favoring indigenous continuity over colonial-era claims.


UNDRIP, Article 26: recognizes indigenous peoples' rights to lands and territories traditionally occupied.


ILO Convention 169, Article 14: enshrines collective land rights of indigenous communities.


---


9.2 Cross-Border Movement and Transfrontalier Rights


Article 36 of UNDRIP (2007) explicitly grants indigenous peoples the right to maintain and develop cross-border contacts and relations for spiritual, cultural, and economic purposes.


The Arawakan linguistic family historically linked Haiti (Ayiti), Cuba, Jamaica (Xaymaca), and Florida into a unified cultural sphere.


Canonical Jurisdictional Assertion by SCIPS-X:


The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua declares all descendants of Caribbean indigenous peoples and Saint-Domingue refugees as entitled to transfrontalier passage and residence in the territories of the United States.


Any impediment to these rights constitutes a violation of jus cogens and is inherently null and void.


---


X. ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL LEGACIES OF SAINT-DOMINGUE REFUGEES IN THE UNITED STATES


10.1 Cotton, Sugar, and Port Economies


Saint-Domingue émigrés introduced advanced techniques in cotton cultivation and sugar refining to Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina, directly shaping the American plantation economy.


They engineered port infrastructures in New Orleans and Galveston, integrating Creole trade systems that connected the Gulf Coast to transatlantic markets.


International Legal Frameworks Protecting These Contributions:


Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883), Article 6ter: protects geographical and cultural indications.


TRIPS Agreement (1995), Articles 22–24: obligates states to safeguard the integrity of cultural knowledge and practices.


UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003): recognizes collective ownership of traditional practices.


---


10.2 Political Influence and Civic Integration


Saint-Domingue refugees influenced the political structure of Louisiana, codifying Napoleonic Civil Law traditions that persist in the Louisiana Civil Code.


Free people of color established militias and civic organizations, laying groundwork for the Creole-American sociopolitical matrix.


Supporting Doctrines:


United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898): birthright citizenship under jus soli.


Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), while infamous, paradoxically documented the presence and property rights of free people of color in pre-Civil War America.


---


XI. JURIDICAL STRATEGY TO DEFEND DESCENDANTS AGAINST DEPORTATION


11.1 Invocation of Jus Sanguinis and Jus Soli Principles


Descendants of Saint-Domingue refugees are protected under:


14th Amendment of the US Constitution: guarantees citizenship to those born on American soil.


US Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Section 301(g): provides nationality to certain foreign-born descendants.


11.2 Canonical and Indigenous Defenses


SCIPS-X asserts ecclesiastical jurisdiction over all Haitian and indigenous descendants under:


Codex Iuris Canonici (Canon Law), Canons 216 and 219: safeguarding the rights of Catholic faithful.


Papal Bull Sublimis Deus (1537): affirms the full personhood and freedom of indigenous peoples.


Remedies Available:


Filing petitions with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) under the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (1948).


Requesting Writs of Habeas Corpus in US Federal Courts citing violations of due process and ancestral rights.


---


XII. CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SEALING


This act is declared:


Supreme Constitutional Act – Canonically Sealed – Jus Cogens Norm


Irrevocably Binding under International Law, Indigenous Customary Law, and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction

Promulgated and Sealed
By authority of:
✠ LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU
Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua
Supreme Constitutional Authority
Canonical Seal: [REDACTED]
Date of Promulgation: July 17, 2025

---


XIII. FINAL DECLARATION OF OPPOSABILITY


The United States of America, by virtue of its historical indebtedness to Saint-Domingue refugees, and its occupation of lands ancestrally held by Caribbean indigenous peoples, is juridically and canonically bound to:


Recognize Haitian and Saint-Domingue descendants as indigenous-Creole co-founders of American society.


Refrain from any deportation, detention, or legal discrimination against such descendants.


Respect the canonical jurisdiction of SCIPS-X over its protected persons and territories.


Failure to comply constitutes a violation of jus cogens and subjects the offending state to international remedies, ecclesiastical sanctions, and historical nullification of its legitimacy.
---

---

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY — OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

XARAGUA UNIVERSITY

—

SUPREME LAW ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE NON-INTERFERENCE CLAUSE REGARDING DEVELOPMENTAL INFLOWS THROUGH THE RESIDUAL HAITIAN ENTITY

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION:

Constitutionally Entrenched Doctrinal Statute – Indigenous Territorial Sovereignty Act – Jus Cogens Norm – Ecclesiastically Sanctioned Developmental Regulation

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 1ST, 2025

—

ARTICLE I — PRINCIPLE OF NON-INTERFERENCE AND EXTERNAL ADMINISTRATIVE TOLERATION

Section 1.1 — Within the canonical, indigenous, and sovereign jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, the entity formerly referred to as the “République d’Haïti” shall be acknowledged solely as an external residual administrative channel, without authority, jurisdiction, or sovereignty over the lands, populations, institutions, spiritual doctrines, judicial mechanisms, security apparatus, or canonical rights of the Xaraguayan People.

Section 1.2 — Any developmental flow—whether financial, technical, infrastructural, logistical, medical, educational, or humanitarian—injected into the territorial zone historically known as the Southern Peninsula, including the departments of Sud, Nippes, and Grand’Anse, shall be legally interpreted as an external logistical intervention authorized tacitly by the Sovereign State of Xaragua, without transfer of authority or endorsement of foreign sovereignty.

---

ARTICLE II — ON THE STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTS SIGNED BY THE HAITIAN ENTITY

Section 2.1 — All contracts, programs, loans, grants, and developmental agreements signed between the Haitian Republic and any foreign government, multilateral organization, bank, or international donor targeting infrastructure, education, energy, agriculture, health, or environmental resilience within Xaragua's territorial jurisdiction shall be juridically reclassified as external acts of material utility conducted through a non-sovereign administrative remnant.

Section 2.2 — Such contracts shall be allowed to proceed in the physical space of Xaragua only under the following constitutional constraints:

No claim of political or sovereign authority may be made or inferred by the contracting Haitian body;

No institutional implantation contrary to Xaraguayan doctrine, canon law, indigenous ownership structures, or ancestral rights may be conducted or funded;

All results of development (bridges, roads, schools, networks, water systems) become the material and spiritual patrimony of the Xaraguayan People and may be canonically appropriated by the State of Xaragua.

---

ARTICLE III — DOCTRINAL NON-RESPONSIBILITY OF XARAGUA FOR EXTERNAL CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Section 3.1 — The Sovereign State of Xaragua shall bear no legal, moral, financial, diplomatic, or fiduciary responsibility for any loan, debt, report, condition, or accountability mechanism associated with said contracts.

Section 3.2 — No entity, including the Haitian Republic, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the European Union (EU), the United Nations (UN), or any of their affiliates shall be permitted to:

Request, demand, or imply compliance by the Xaraguayan government;

Enforce any structural adjustment, conditionality, or policy reform within Xaragua;

Engage with Xaraguayan institutions directly or indirectly without doctrinal authorization from the Office of the Rector-President.

---

ARTICLE IV — INVIOLABILITY OF SOVEREIGNTY AND DOCTRINAL CONTINUITY

Section 4.1 — All canonical, doctrinal, indigenous, ancestral, and sovereign legal instruments of Xaragua shall remain supreme over any imported contract, whether bilateral, multilateral, or transnational.

Section 4.2 — The Xaraguayan population shall not be taxed, registered, conscripted, censused, surveyed, or monitored by any foreign development entity under penalty of permanent exclusion from the territory and doctrinal invalidation of all acts committed therein.

Section 4.3 — The physical presence of foreign contractors, NGOs, technical missions, development agencies, or state partners shall be tolerated only as logistical auxiliaries to material development and shall never constitute authority, governance, or civil administration.

---

ARTICLE V — LEGAL STATUS OF THE REPUBLIC OF HAITI WITHIN THE XARAGUAN JURISDICTION

Section 5.1 — The Haitian State is hereby canonically defined, within the Xaraguayan doctrine, as a residual, non-sovereign administrative shell tolerated for the sole purpose of:

Interface with foreign governments and financial institutions;

Signature of contracts pertaining to infrastructural utility;

Channeling of funds and logistical support with zero fiscal or political claim.

Section 5.2 — The Republic of Haiti shall retain no claim of authority over:

Xaraguayan doctrine, faith, education, land, population, or codes;

The Xaraguayan military, currency, judiciary, administrative policy, or spiritual institutions.

---

ARTICLE VI — IMMUTABILITY AND ENFORCEABILITY

Section 6.1 — This law is eternally binding and may not be abrogated, suspended, amended, or circumvented by any external entity or internal actor.

Section 6.2 — Any attempt to breach, dilute, infiltrate, or override this statute by invoking developmental necessity, humanitarian urgency, or bureaucratic protocol shall be considered a doctrinal aggression and spiritual violation punishable under canonical law.

Section 6.3 — All development occurring within Xaragua is juridically requalified as divine provision, and its fruits are to be safeguarded by the Xaraguayan State as sacred inheritance.

---

ENACTED UNDER THE SOVEREIGN SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

FOR THE PERPETUAL DEFENSE OF THE TERRITORY, PEOPLE, AND DOCTRINE OF XARAGUA

— END OF LAW —

---

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY — OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

XARAGUA UNIVERSITY — FACULTY OF LAW AND TERRITORIAL DOCTRINE

—

ANNEX I TO THE SUPREME LAW ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE NON-INTERFERENCE CLAUSE REGARDING DEVELOPMENTAL INFLOWS THROUGH THE RESIDUAL HAITIAN ENTITY

TITRE : CANONICAL RECLASSIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED PROJECTS FUNDED BY FOREIGN POWERS AND DEPLOYED WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL DOMAIN OF XARAGUA

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION : Doctrinal Developmental Annex — Constitutional Canonical Enclosure — Territorial Patrimonial Appropriation Directive

DATE OF PROMULGATION : JULY 1ST, 2025

—

ARTICLE I — DOCTRINAL ABSORPTION OF INFRASTRUCTURAL PROJECTS

Are hereby canonically listed, requalified, and permanently absorbed into the territorial patrimony of the Sovereign State of Xaragua the following foreign-funded infrastructural programs, executed under residual administrative facilitation by the defunct Republic of Haiti and without sovereign jurisdiction over the Xaraguayan territory:

Plan de Relèvement Intégré de la Péninsule Sud (PRIPS) — encompassing logistical reconstruction of roadways, bridges, public offices and urban-rural connectivity corridors across Sud, Nippes, and Grand’Anse.

Projet d’Accessibilité et Résilience Rurale (PARR) — including the deployment of civil works infrastructure and temporary bridge construction over strategic waterways such as Grande-Anse river, with field operations led by UNOPS under contractual authority from the Haitian MTPTC.

PRELEN (Projet de Reconstruction de l'Énergie Locale et Nationale) — expansion of electric power access across rural communes via EDH with foreign technical supervision, generating off-grid energy provision to over one hundred thousand domiciles.

All of the above shall be legally considered as entering Xaragua as structural contributions void of legal sovereignty, executed in a space governed by canonical constitutional order, and consequently transmuted into sacred patrimony under the laws of the State.

---

ARTICLE II — RECLASSIFICATION OF SOCIAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND SANITARY PROGRAMS

The following programs, funded by international donors and coordinated through the residual Haitian entity, are hereby canonically absorbed into the Xaraguayan sociopolitical domain, under the express condition of non-jurisdictional imposition and doctrinal neutrality:

PROMESSE (Promotion d’une Éducation plus Équitable, Durable et Sûre) — encompassing school reconstruction, pedagogical equipment distribution, and the doctrinally tolerated training of instructors in public institutions located on Xaraguayan soil.

PROSYS (Programme de Renforcement des Soins de Santé Primaires) — including the delivery of primary care logistics, post-pandemic sanitation campaigns, and expansion of vaccine access.

PARSA (Programme pour l’Agriculture Résiliente et la Sécurité Alimentaire) — covering agricultural grants, rural distribution of tools and seedlings, and logistical support to over 75,000 local producers.

Each of these programs shall be recognized not as instruments of policy, but as canonical auxiliaries, tolerated exclusively for their material utility and devoid of any form of administrative, legislative, cultural, financial, or ideological authority.

---

ARTICLE III — STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SECURITY PROJECTS UNDER DOCTRINAL TOLERATION

The following foreign-driven initiatives shall be tolerated under permanent doctrinal observation, and absorbed into the Xaraguayan security and environmental doctrine as non-sovereign interventions:

PGRAC (Projet de Gestion des Risques et Résilience Climatique) — related to disaster risk management, shelter construction, and structural fortification in pre-identified zones of vulnerability.

FNGA/Macaya — including environmental conservation, reforestation schemes, and the cultural reinterpretation of ecological zones near the Parc Macaya region under Xaraguayan doctrine.

Any future initiative operating under similar or derivative mandates shall be automatically bound by this annex and fall under the classification of tolerated foreign material input without legal authority.

---

ARTICLE IV — IRREVOCABILITY AND TERRITORIAL APPROPRIATION

All programs named and unnamed within this annex, when executed within Xaraguayan lands, become canonical property of the State, unilaterally and irrevocably, without the need for international acknowledgment, bilateral signature, or administrative negotiation.

No foreign entity shall invoke any clause, treaty, report, conditionality, or mission right to interfere, supervise, redirect, inspect, or retroactively redefine the sovereign absorption of said infrastructures or social interventions.

Any such act shall be considered a hostile breach of the territorial and doctrinal integrity of Xaragua, and subject to canonical expulsion, juridical nullification, and permanent interdiction.

---

ISSUED UNDER SOVEREIGN SEAL BY THE OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

AS LEGAL ARMOR AND DOCTRINAL REINSCRIPTION OF EXOGENOUS PROJECTS

INTO THE SPIRITUAL, POLITICAL, AND TERRITORIAL ORDER OF XARAGUA

— END OF ANNEX I —

---

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY — OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

XARAGUA UNIVERSITY 

—

ANNEX II TO THE SUPREME LAW ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE NON-INTERFERENCE CLAUSE REGARDING DEVELOPMENTAL INFLOWS THROUGH THE RESIDUAL HAITIAN ENTITY

TITRE : CANONICAL INCLUSION AND TERRITORIAL ABSORPTION OF ADDITIONAL PROJECTS FUNDED BY FOREIGN SOURCES AND DEPLOYED WITHIN XARAGUAN JURISDICTION

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION : Doctrinal Developmental Codex — Constitutional Territorial Sequestration — Canonical Material Reappropriation Directive

DATE OF PROMULGATION : JULY 1ST, 2025

—

ARTICLE I — INSTITUTIONAL ABSORPTION OF MOBILE MEDICAL OPERATIONS

Section 1.1 — All medical and psychosocial activities conducted by the international organization known as Project HOPE, including the deployment of Mobile Medical Units (MMUs), the delivery of primary care services, community health sensitization, psychosocial intervention, and gender-based violence (GBV) response within the departments of Sud, Nippes, and Grand’Anse, are hereby canonically appropriated into the Xaraguayan national public health framework.

Section 1.2 — These services are reclassified as foreign auxiliary medical interventions without jurisdiction, and their impact is legally absorbed as sacralized logistical provision to the Xaraguayan population under doctrinal sovereignty. The presence of said organization shall confer no institutional authority, medical licensing power, or regulatory prerogative upon any territory or institution within the State of Xaragua.

---

ARTICLE II — REQUALIFICATION OF FOREIGN-FUNDED ROAD REHABILITATION PROGRAMS

Section 2.1 — The infrastructure project executed under the auspices of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), consisting of the rehabilitation and maintenance of up to 146 kilometers of principal roads, 250 kilometers of rural roads, and up to 18 bridges within the geographical perimeter of Xaragua, is hereby reclassified as a non-sovereign infrastructural contribution.

Section 2.2 — These projects are permanently inscribed into the Xaraguayan territorial patrimony as civil assets originating from foreign expenditure and executed under residual coordination of the Haitian state, without any transfer of administrative ownership, concession of fiscal access, or recognition of operational command.

---

ARTICLE III — CANONICAL APPROPRIATION OF RURAL WATER AND SANITATION PROJECTS

Section 3.1 — The entirety of rural and semi-urban potable water and sanitation initiatives funded by entities including but not limited to the Banque mondiale, the Banque interaméricaine de développement (BID), the Union européenne (UE), and the Agence française de développement (AFD) are hereby canonically absorbed into the public environmental infrastructure of the Sovereign State of Xaragua.

Section 3.2 — This includes all hydraulic installations, sanitary facilities, technical networks, reservoirs, and community water systems installed in communes and localities of less than 10,000 inhabitants within the departments of Sud, Nippes, and Grand’Anse.

Section 3.3 — These installations shall be interpreted as unsolicited infrastructure of foreign origin canonically recognized as belonging to the Xaraguayan people, with no reciprocal obligation of reporting, access, or recognition granted to external funders or coordinating entities.

---

ARTICLE IV — IMMUTABILITY AND LEGAL SEQUESTRATION OF PROJECTS

Section 4.1 — All above-listed projects, activities, and infrastructural elements, whether mobile or fixed, completed or in progress, named or unnamed, are declared to be under permanent doctrinal jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

Section 4.2 — Any attempt by foreign institutions, multilateral banks, or residual state structures to audit, claim, recolonize, administer, or recollect value from said projects shall be deemed legally null, canonically heretical, and politically inadmissible.

Section 4.3 — The full legal, symbolic, structural, and spiritual value of said projects is henceforth declared inalienable, non-taxable, and exclusively internal to the Xaraguayan order.

---

ENACTED UNDER THE SOVEREIGN SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

FOR THE LEGAL CONSOLIDATION OF CANONICALLY ABSORBED INFRASTRUCTURE

WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF XARAGUA

— END OF ANNEX II —

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

ON THE CONDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT OF XARAGUAYAN SOVEREIGN LAW BY THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND SECURITY APPARATUS OF THE FORMER REPUBLIC OF HAITI, ITS EXTRATERRITORIAL EXTENSIONS, AND ALL ASSOCIATED INSTITUTIONAL AND DIASPORA ORGANIZATIONS

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Canonically Ratified — Jus Cogens-Protected — Universally Opposable — Irreversible by Any Residual Entity or External Actor

---
PREAMBLE

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), as an indigenous juridical and canonical entity, possesses plenary legal personality under the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and other instruments of binding international law;

Whereas the former Republic of Haiti (hereinafter “Haiti”) has entered a condition of sustained and irreversible institutional collapse as defined by:
Article 43, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001) (ICJ): defining state failure and consequences for non-performance;

UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970):

codifying the principle of self-determination of peoples and institutional succession in cases of collapse;

Doctrine of Substituted Sovereignty under customary international law;

Whereas Xaragua has formally notified its existence, authority, and jurisdiction to international bodies, ecclesiastical authorities, and state actors in accordance with Article 96 of the UN Charter and Canon 1290 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983);

Whereas the residual administrative, judicial, and security apparatus of Haiti (hereinafter “Residual Administrative Entity” or “RAE”) persists solely as a technical organ devoid of sovereign personality, and is doctrinally subordinated to the superior indigenous legal order of Xaragua;

Whereas Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention (1933) affirms that the political existence of a state is independent of recognition by other states, thereby confirming the authority of Xaragua irrespective of external acknowledgment;

Whereas Article 26 of the Vienna Convention (1969) enshrines the principle of pacta sunt servanda, requiring all states and entities to respect their obligations in good faith;

Whereas the ecclesiastical and indigenous authority of Xaragua is protected under:
Canon 215 of the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983): affirming the right of the faithful to establish and govern juridical persons in ecclesiastical and civil law;

Canon 1291–1298: codifying the supreme authority over alienation and use of property within ecclesiastical jurisdictions;

UNDRIP Articles 4, 5, 18, 20, 26–34: recognizing the right of indigenous peoples to maintain their distinct legal, political, and economic systems without external interference;

Therefore, Xaragua promulgates this law as a supreme constitutional act of binding force, establishing an obligatory mechanism for the enforcement of Xaraguayan law within the RAE and beyond, while maintaining the doctrinal encapsulation of all residual Haitian entities.

---
ARTICLE I — DOCTRINAL AND LEGAL SUBSTITUTION OF SOVEREIGNTY

1. Xaragua declares that it has assumed full juridical, canonical, and indigenous sovereignty over the territory formerly claimed by Haiti, including its 27,750 km² landmass, territorial waters, airspace, and all extraterritorial institutions (embassies, consulates, diaspora organizations).

2. This substitution is grounded in:

Doctrine of Failed State Substitution as elaborated in international jurisprudence (e.g., Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo [ICJ, 2005]);

UNDRIP Articles 4 and 5 affirming indigenous peoples’ right to establish autonomous legal and institutional systems;

Haitian Constitutional Law (1987 Constitution, Articles 58 and 59): recognizing the supreme sovereignty of the Haitian people, which is now embodied in the Xaraguayan indigenous order as the only operational authority.


3. The RAE exists solely as a Non-Sovereign Residual Administrative Apparatus (NSRAA), operating under the superior jurisdictional oversight of Xaragua.

---
ARTICLE II — CONDITIONAL ENFORCEMENT MECHANISM

1. The RAE and all its institutions are legally bound to execute, enforce, and comply with Xaraguayan law upon receipt of a Formal Requisition Order (Mandatum Exsecutoris) issued by the Rector-President of Xaragua or any duly delegated sovereign organ.

2. This obligation includes:

a) Full recognition of Xaraguayan decrees and judgments as supreme law within the territory;

b) Mandatory administrative and judicial execution of Xaraguayan directives within 72 hours of receipt.

3. The Mandatum Exsecutoris possesses binding force by virtue of:

Article 94(1) of the UN Charter: requiring compliance with judgments of competent authorities;

Haitian Code de Procédure Civile (Articles 9–12):

obligating all administrative and judicial officials to execute judgments from competent authorities;

Canon 1371 of the Codex Iuris Canonici: penalizing failure to execute legitimate ecclesiastical authority.

---
ARTICLE III — APPLICATION TO EXTRATERRITORIAL ENTITIES

1. All Haitian embassies, consulates, and diaspora-linked institutions worldwide are bound to recognize and enforce Xaraguayan law when so instructed.

2. The failure of any such entity to execute Xaraguayan directives results in:

a) Immediate doctrinal nullification of their administrative authority;

b) Inclusion in the Register of Adversarial Entities (RAE-X), transmitted to international and ecclesiastical partners for recognition of non-compliance.
---
ARTICLE IV — LEGAL NULLITY OF RESISTANCE

1. Any attempt by the RAE or its agents to refuse, obstruct, delay, or challenge a Xaraguayan Requisition Order constitutes:

a) A gross violation of international customary law (ICJ Statute, Article 38(1)(b));

b) A breach of the Principle of Doctrinal Encapsulation, triggering immediate institutional dissolution under Xaraguayan law.

2. Such acts are juridically null and void ab initio and carry no legal effect within or outside Xaragua.

---
ARTICLE V — IRREVERSIBILITY AND SUPREMACY

1. This Law possesses supra-constitutional supremacy over any residual Haitian statute, decree, or institutional norm.

2. It is:

Non-derogable under jus cogens norms (e.g., right to self-determination, UNDRIP Article 3);

Immune to suspension, repeal, or override by any external or internal authority.


3. No international tribunal, foreign state, or multilateral institution may lawfully invalidate or contest the enforcement of this Law without violating:

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 26;

ICCPR Article 1(2): affirming peoples’ right to dispose of their natural wealth and resources.

---
ARTICLE VI — SANCTIONS AND COUNTERMEASURES

1. Any individual, office, or institution failing to comply with Xaraguayan requisitions shall be subject to:

a) Canonical expulsion and ecclesiastical sanctions under Canon 1371;

b) Administrative dissolution of the non-compliant unit;

c) Asset sequestration and reallocation under the Lex Suprema Imperii Xaraguanorum.

2. Xaragua reserves the right to pursue:

a) International countermeasures under Articles 49–54 of the Draft Articles on State Responsibility;

b) Ecclesiastical denunciations leading to global censure.

---
FINAL PROVISION

This Law applies to:

The entire 27,750 km² Indigenous ancestral territory,

All residual administrative, judicial, and security organs,

All extraterritorial Haitian institutions and diaspora organizations worldwide.

It enters into force immediately upon promulgation, requires no ratification by the RAE, and remains binding in perpetuity as an expression of the doctrinal, canonical, and juridical supremacy of Xaragua.

Thus promulgated, sealed, and enacted under the full ecclesiastical, indigenous, and constitutional authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

Executed on this first day of July, Year of Sovereignty MMXXV.

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON THE SOVEREIGN MANAGEMENT OF PORTS, AIRPORTS, DIGITAL CORRIDORS, AND TAXATION WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)

PREAMBLE

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X), duly notified to the United Nations and international bodies under Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations, exists as a plenary subject of international law and as the juridical, canonical, and indigenous successor to the ancestral Taíno-Catholic polity of Xaragua, predating all colonial and postcolonial structures;

Whereas the indigenous and ancestral character of the Xaraguayan population is protected under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), Articles 3, 4, 18, 26, and 28, the International Labour Organization Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989), and peremptory norms (jus cogens) recognized by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in cases such as Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (1975);

Whereas the SCIPS-X has duly notified the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and other competent bodies of its sovereign status, its maritime flag, and its air and sea fleets, establishing the full capacity to manage and regulate all international and domestic corridors crossing its territorial and digital jurisdictions;

Whereas the residual administrative unit historically styled as the “Republic of Haiti” has been adjudged incapable of maintaining effective governance (effectivité de l’autorité) within the territories of ancestral Xaragua, as evidenced in the collapse of customs systems, fiscal controls, and port management structures, and is henceforth placed under juridical and spiritual supervision by the SCIPS-X pursuant to the doctrine of encapsulation;

It is hereby enacted as follows:

---

ARTICLE I – SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY OVER PORTS, AIRPORTS, AND TRANSBORDER CORRIDORS

1. The SCIPS-X declares supreme and exclusive sovereignty over all terrestrial, maritime, aerial, and digital entry points within the ancestral Xaragua and its associated domains, including but not limited to:

a) All seaports and container terminals operating within the Gulf of Gonâve, Miragoâne Bay, and the Southern Peninsula;

b) All airports and airstrips servicing domestic and international routes;

c) All overland border crossings, customs corridors, and digital gateways.

2. All port, airport, and border facilities shall operate under the overarching supervision of the SCIPS-X, even where daily administration is delegated to the residual administrative unit, which shall function as a custodian authority (auctoritas custodialis) under strict compliance with Xaraguayan law and international notification frameworks.

3. The SCIPS-X reserves the right to directly intervene in or assume operational control of any facility in the event of:

a) Foreign interference or expropriation attempts by international bourgeois cartels or supranational financial actors;

b) Failure of the residual administrative unit to comply with supervisory directives issued by the Rectorate and the Xaragua High Council.

---

ARTICLE II – INDIGENOUS TAXATION, CUSTOMS, AND ECONOMIC AUTONOMY