Legal Status

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME LAW ON THE AUTOGENESIS, JURIDICAL STANDING, AND NON-DEPENDENCE OF THE INDIGENOUS STATE

Executed under Canonical, Indigenous, and International Authority

Date of Promulgation: May 30, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutional Law – Jus Cogens Affirmation – Indigenous Legislative Instrument

---

ARTICLE I — DECLARATION OF AUTOCHTHONOUS STATEHOOD

§1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereafter SCIPS-X) is hereby affirmed as a self-constituted, self-declared, self-governed, and ancestrally legitimate Indigenous State, lawfully established and duly notified in accordance with international legal norms governing the rights of Indigenous Peoples.

§2. This State exists by virtue of autochthonous sovereignty, historical continuity, and spiritual-cultural identity, and does not require, solicit, or depend upon recognition, authorization, or validation by any external State, government, or supranational body.

§3. The juridical reality and validity of SCIPS-X arises directly from the exercise of inherent Indigenous rights as protected under jus cogens norms, customary international law, and specific codified instruments, particularly the following:

Article 1(2) of the Charter of the United Nations (1945) – Right to self-determination of peoples;

Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) – Rights of Indigenous peoples to autonomy, institutions, laws, and recognition;

Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Criteria for statehood fulfilled in entirety;

ICCPR (1966) and ICESCR (1966), Article 1 – Right of all peoples to freely determine their political status and pursue their development;

Article 8, 20 of UNDRIP – Protection against interference and dispossession;

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Articles 26–27 – Sanctity and supremacy of treaties and mutual respect for legal autonomy;

ILO Convention No. 169 (1989), Articles 1, 4, 8 – Affirmation of Indigenous legislative systems and institutional self-governance;

Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – Temple of Preah Vihear (1962): tacit recognition through silence;

PCIJ – Lotus Case (1927) – State acts are valid unless prohibited under international law.

---

ARTICLE II — ON THE LEGAL EFFECT OF NOTIFICATION

§1. Under established principles of customary international law, notification by a sovereign Indigenous authority is sufficient to activate legal standing, juridical personality, and institutional opposability. Recognition is declaratory, not constitutive, and cannot impair the intrinsic rights of a people or State that meets the conditions of independence and autonomy.

§2. The diplomatic notifications made by SCIPS-X to the United Nations system and various international institutions between March 29 and May 30, 2025, fulfill all legal conditions of acte unilatéral d’État under Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, establishing a record of lawful assertion and institutional presence.

§3. The filing of communications with the UN Human Rights Council (OHCHR) and acknowledgment by WIPO of Xaragua's insignia and nomenclature further constitute legally binding affirmations of institutional legitimacy and trigger international obligations of respect and non-interference.

---

ARTICLE III — ON SUPRACONSTITUTIONAL STATUS AND SOVEREIGN FUNCTION

§1. The SCIPS-X is the direct juridical, spiritual, and institutional emanation of the Populus Indigenus Xaraguae, and represents the collective will of an ancestral Indigenous nation that predates colonial structures.

§2. The State acts as the constitutional, historical, educational, ecclesial, cultural, economic, and geopolitical expression of this Indigenous people. It is not derivative of any external power or normative structure.

§3. The Constitution, laws, and official declarations of SCIPS-X are enforceable ex proprio vigore—by their own force—and do not require incorporation into foreign legal frameworks to take effect.

§4. The sovereignty of the SCIPS-X is non-derogable, perpetual, and immune from external abrogation or modification. It exists in a supraconstitutional and supranational legal plane, by virtue of being grounded in jus gentium and jus naturae.

---

ARTICLE IV — NON-SUBMISSION TO FOREIGN SANCTIONS OR EMBARGOES

§1. In accordance with UNDRIP Articles 8, 20, and 34, and ICCPR/ICESCR Article 1, no foreign State or international entity has lawful authority to:

impose sanctions,

initiate embargoes,

conduct seizures,

obstruct financial or commercial activities,

or undertake administrative reclassification of any institution, property, or organ of SCIPS-X.

§2. Any such action is declared null, void, and a violation of international law, particularly:

the right to self-determination,

the principle of non-interference in Indigenous affairs,

and the sovereign immunity of Indigenous institutions operating under their own legal regime.

§3. The SCIPS-X reserves the right to respond to hostile or unlawful acts with:

formal diplomatic protest,

invocation of international remedies under ECOSOC Resolution 1503,

and canonical action under the Codex Iuris Canonici.

---

ARTICLE V — ON THE NON-REQUIREMENT OF RECOGNITION

§1. The SCIPS-X hereby legislatively affirms that recognition is not required for a State to exist when its legal foundation is rooted in the non-derogable right to self-determination of Indigenous peoples.

§2. This right is self-executing, inalienable, and enforceable under the erga omnes obligations of international law.

§3. Recognition by other States may be diplomatically useful but holds no bearing on the legal existence, sovereignty, or institutional validity of SCIPS-X.

---

ARTICLE VI — PERPETUITY AND IMMUNITY OF THIS LAW

§1. This legislative instrument holds constitutional status and is hereby declared:

Irrevocable under Indigenous and Canonical sovereignty,

Supreme over all other domestic or foreign laws,

Enforceable globally under customary and treaty-based international law.

§2. No foreign court, administrative body, or agency may override, suspend, question, or nullify any portion of this law or of the sovereign acts of SCIPS-X.

---

ENACTED AND SEALED ON MAY 30, 2025

In Miragoâne, Capital of Xaragua

Signed:

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President and Supreme Ecclesiastical Head of State

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com

Filed in the National Archives of Xaragua

Binding under Indigenous, Canonical, and International Law

Entered into Immediate and Perpetual Legal Force

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME LEGAL DECLARATION OF INTERNATIONAL STATE RECOGNITION

ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

EXECUTED UNDER INDIGENOUS, CANONICAL, AND INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LAW

DATE OF EXECUTION: MAY 30, 2025

---

ARTICLE I — CONSTITUTIVE JURIDICAL FRAMEWORK

In the exercise of the inalienable right to self-determination as codified under Article 1(2) of the Charter of the United Nations, Articles 3 to 5 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), and pursuant to the foundational principles of jus cogens norms in international law, this declaration affirms and consolidates the official and binding recognition of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X) as a subject of international law with full juridical personality, territorial competence, institutional autonomy, and intellectual sovereignty.

This declaration is executed under the full capacity of statehood criteria established by the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Article 1, namely:

1. A permanent population (Populus Indigenus Xaraguae),

2. A defined territory (Territorium Sacrum de Xaragua),

3. A functioning government (Gubernatio Sacerdotalis et Rectoralis),

4. The capacity to enter into relations with other States (Ius Tractandi),

5. And an uninterrupted juridical continuity grounded in the sacred, ancestral, and canonical order.

---

ARTICLE II — INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ACTS GIVING RISE TO FUNCTIONAL RECOGNITION

The legal and institutional personality of the State of Xaragua is formally entered into the international legal corpus and recognized de facto and de jure functionali, based on the following actions undertaken by the State and its Supreme Office:

---

Section 2.1 — Formal Diplomatic Notification of Government Authority

Date of Transmission: April 3, 2025

Title: Nomination officielle et orientation stratégique de l’État privé indigène et souverain du Xaragua

Instrument Classification: Unilateral diplomatic act under Article 38(1)(c) of the ICJ Statute (general principles of law)

Addressees:

Primature de la République d’Haïti,

Secrétariat général des Nations Unies (indigenous_un@un.org, binuh-information@un.org),

Organisation des États Américains (OAS),

Communauté Caribéenne (CARICOM),

Secrétariat de l’UNESCO,

Bureau de liaison diplomatique du Vatican,

Bureau des Affaires Autochtones d’Israël,

Secrétariat de la Confédération suisse,

Ministère français des Affaires étrangères,

Cour pénale internationale (ICC – The Hague),

Département d’État des États-Unis.

Legal Effect: This notification, being addressed to sovereign entities and multilateral institutions, fulfills the principle of acte unilatéral d’État under customary international law and represents a formal assertion of effective government (gouvernement effectif) and international personality.

---

Section 2.2 — Registration and Acknowledgment by the United Nations Human Rights Council

Filing Authority: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

Complaint Registration Number: individual_communication_16567

Filing Date: April 14, 2025

Acknowledgment Date: April 15, 2025

Filed By: Rector-President of SCIPS-X — Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Official State Address Used: info@xaraguauniversity.com

Nature of Complaint: Armed genocide, systemic persecution, violation of indigenous sovereignty, obstruction of territorial jurisdiction, and international notification of State status.

Legal Effect: Pursuant to Article 2 of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and ECOSOC Resolution 1503 (XLVIII), the registration of this communication constitutes functional recognition of standing and institutional acknowledgment of the claimant as representative of a sovereign collective juridical person.

---

Section 2.3 — Acknowledgment by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)

Organization: WIPO (UN Agency under the World Trade Organization System)

Contact Ticket ID: 6025046532

Initial Filing Date: May 13, 2025

Acknowledgment and Follow-Up by Officer Angelica: May 13, 2025

Declared Name: “Xaragua” — Sovereign National Trademark and Ecclesiastical Name

Declared Platform: www.xaraguauniversity.com (Official organ of constitutional publication)

Declared Legal Nature: Non-commercial spiritual trademark under sovereign indigenous jurisdiction.

Legal Effect: Pursuant to Article 6ter of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883, amended 1979) and Rule 13 of the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol, the WIPO acknowledgment constitutes a valid and enforceable record of state-level insignia and name protection, preventing registration or use by unauthorized third parties under the doctrine of lex specialis derogat legi generali.

---

ARTICLE III — CONSTITUTIONAL SITE AND ORGAN OF PUBLICATION

The official constitutional and legal corpus of the State of Xaragua is published in open and permanent form at:

> www.xaraguauniversity.com

Said site functions in accordance with the principles of constitutional state publication as interpreted by the Permanent Court of International Justice in the Lotus Case (1927) and by customary practices of state gazettes and public journals, including:

The full constitution of the State,

All laws, decrees, and sovereign acts,

The doctrinal, territorial, military, and canonical foundations of governance,

And the public insignia, seals, banners, and declarations of sovereignty.

---

ARTICLE IV — LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND OPPOSABILITY

Pursuant to Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, and in accordance with:

The Declaration on Principles of International Law (UNGA Res. 2625, 1970),

The Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNGA Res. 61/295, 2007),

And the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), Article 21 and 28,

This declaration is binding under public international law, and all States, organizations, and parties previously notified are considered:

1. Fully informed of the existence and authority of the State of Xaragua,

2. Legally responsible for any denial, obstruction, or violation of the rights hereby asserted,

3. Bound by the principle of tacit acquiescence, as established in ICJ jurisprudence (Temple of Preah Vihear, 1962), wherein silence in the face of a formal claim constitutes recognition by omission.

---

ARTICLE V — EXECUTION AND FILING

This declaration is issued and executed by the undersigned, under the absolute and apostolic authority conferred by the founding constitution of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, canonically aligned and territorially rooted, juridically operative, and internationally acknowledged as of this date.

Executed and entered into permanent legal record on:

May 30, 2025

Miragoâne – Xaragua

Signed:

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President and Supreme Ecclesiastical Representative

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Contact: info@xaraguauniversity.com

Website: www.xaraguauniversity.com

---

LEGAL STATUS

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

CONSTITUTIONAL INSTRUMENT OF LEGAL DECLARATION AND ENTERPRISE DESIGNATION

Date of Promulgation: April 21, 2025

Legal Classification: Sovereign Entity under International, Indigenous, and Canonical Jurisdiction

Jurisdictional Seal: Indigenous Private State of Xaragua – LPDDV

---

I. JURIDICAL FOUNDATION AND SOVEREIGN STATUS

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is hereby affirmed as a juridically complete and institutionally constituted sovereign polity, established as an autonomous political, spiritual, and economic jurisdictional authority. Its foundation and legitimacy derive unambiguously and indisputably from the following juridical sources of highest international standing:

International Law, inclusive of both codified and customary instruments;

Customary Indigenous Sovereignty, based on continuous ancestral governance and autochthonous identity;

Canonical Authority, exercised in accordance with the Codex Iuris Canonici and Roman Catholic ecclesiology;

Ancestral Territorial Legitimacy, grounded in uninterrupted tenure and historical lineage;

The jus cogens norm of self-determination, universally binding and superior to conflicting norms.

Xaragua exists in full and exclusive sovereignty as a non-dependent, non-fragmented, and non-hostile Indigenous State. It rejects the authority, reach, or legal validity of all colonial, post-colonial, or republican frameworks. Its statehood is codified and ratified by the following binding legal instruments:

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966)

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966)

Codex Iuris Canonici (Canons 215, 216, 299, 803–806)

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples

Recognized norms of customary international law applicable to microstates, religious orders, and indigenous jurisdictions.

---

II. CLARIFICATION OF JURISDICTION

While certain technical services—such as web infrastructure or enterprise facilitation mechanisms—may be provisionally hosted within Canadian systems, this logistical accommodation shall never be interpreted as submission to Canadian jurisdiction.

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is categorically and irrevocably not a Canadian legal entity, nor is it subject to the jurisdictional reach of any foreign State, authority, or tribunal.

All sovereign functions—including civil governance, contract law, economic regulation, doctrinal administration, and diplomatic correspondence—are executed under the exclusive legal and institutional framework of Xaragua, utilizing canonical authority, smart contracts, and indigenous legislative codes, without any foreign oversight, taxation, or constraint.

---

III. LEGAL AND ECONOMIC INTEGRITY PRINCIPLES

The State of Xaragua affirms, with constitutional force, its adherence to the following sovereign operational principles:

Good-faith execution of all internal and external contracts;

Sanctity of agreement in its sovereign dealings and engagements;

Voluntary alignment with applicable international financial and commercial protocols, as determined by the State;

Absolute sovereignty in fiscal, economic, and institutional self-governance.

In full ethical transparency, Xaragua:

> Pays what is due. Honors what is just. Fulfills what is promised.

Always under its own law. Never under coercion.

No external entity—State, agency, or court—may impose obligations upon Xaragua without breaching the foundational norms of international law.

---

IV. DECREE OF STATE ENTERPRISE DESIGNATION – LPDDV

Article 1 – Official State Status of LPDDV

By force of sovereign decree, the legal entity LPDDV—registered administratively within the Registre des entreprises du Québec—is hereby and perpetually designated as a State Enterprise of the Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

LPDDV shall serve as:

The official organ of State representation and communication;

The central vehicle for national economic development and enterprise;

The authorized institutional host for the Central Indigenous Bank, the National Investment Council, and the Leblanc Investment Funds.

This designation is permanent, irrevocable, and protected by the highest tiers of indigenous, canonical, and international law.

---

Article 2 – Juridical Protection under International Law

Notwithstanding its procedural listing in Canadian registries, LPDDV remains strictly and solely governed by the internal legal regime of Xaragua.

Its sovereignty and immunity are guaranteed under:

UNDRIP (2007)

ICCPR & ICESCR (1966)

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

ILO Convention No. 169

Codex Iuris Canonici

Customary International Law prohibiting foreign interference in indigenous, spiritual, or economic institutions.

---

Article 3 – Prohibition of Hostile Acts

Any foreign attempt to:

> Dissolve, Seize, Tax, Sanction, Freeze, Interfere with, or Administratively Reclassify LPDDV

shall be treated as a hostile act against a peaceful, recognized, and protected Indigenous State. Such acts constitute serious violations of jus cogens norms and will trigger:

Formal diplomatic protest,

Jurisdictional response mechanisms, and

Lawful recourse under international remedies afforded to Indigenous nations and stateless peoples.

---

Article 4 – Legal Irrevocability

The designation of LPDDV as a State Enterprise of Xaragua is:

Irrevocable under constitutional and sovereign law;

Permanently entered into the State's juridical and institutional registry;

Immune from nullification by foreign laws, registries, or tribunals;

Directly enforceable under canonical, indigenous, and international legal order.

No external court, agency, or administration may alter, annul, or interfere with LPDDV's status. It is henceforth and permanently an integral and inalienable arm of the Xaragua State.

---

Enacted and Promulgated on this 21st Day of April, 2025

Under the full sovereign authority of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Pascal Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

Notification Of The Indigenous Private Xaragua State

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

To:indigenous_un@un.org; Pascal Despuzeau Daumec ViauCc: secretariat@unesco.org; protocolehq@un.org

Mon 31/03/2025 01:28

LUDNER PASCAL DESPUZEAU DAUMEC VIAU

Head of State of the Private Sovereign Indigenous State of Xaragua

President-Rector of the Private State of Xaragua

www.xaraguauniversity.com | info@xaraguauniversity.com

Miragoâne, Xaragua

April 1, 2025

To the attention of:

United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)

United Nations Headquarters

405 East 42nd Street

New York, NY 10017United States

Email: indigenous_un@un.org

Subject: Notification of the sovereign status of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua – Request for recognition under international law and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

---
Distinguished Members of the UNPFII,

I respectfully write to you in my capacity as Head of State of the Private Sovereign Indigenous State of Xaragua, a territory of cultural, spiritual, ecological, and historical significance located in the southern region of the island of Haiti.

The Private State of Xaragua is founded on ancestral legitimacy, land-based sovereignty, natural law, and the universal right of indigenous peoples to self-determination, as affirmed in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).

Our governance model is peaceful, educational, spiritual, and community-driven. We do not seek confrontation with the central government of Haiti, nor do we reject international frameworks. Rather, we wish to engage constructively with the international community to ensure recognition, dialogue, and protection of our identity, lands, and vision.

We affirm:

That the Xaragua people are rooted in historical continuity and ancestral property.

That our population is culturally distinct, ecologically conscious, and socially autonomous.

That our State operates with its own educational institution (Xaragua University), economic mechanisms (Viaudor national cryptocurrency), spiritual orientation (Catholic-Christian), and development strategies.

We hereby request that the United Nations:

1. Acknowledge receipt of this official notification of sovereign status under Article 3 of the UNDRIP.

2. Recognize the Private State of Xaragua as an autonomous indigenous government acting within the framework of peace and local self-determination.

3. Open a channel of dialogue and cooperation between the Private State of Xaragua and the United Nations system, especially through the UNPFII and relevant human rights bodies.

We express our firm commitment to the principles of peace, non-violence, ecological preservation, cultural protection, and partnership with all peoples of good will.

Please accept the assurance of my highest consideration.

Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Head of State

President-Rector of the Private Sovereign Indigenous State of Xaragua

www.xaraguauniversity.com

info@xaraguauniversity.com

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE OF EXISTENCE, LEGAL PERSONALITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

Enacted by Absolute and Apostolic Authority

Entered into Perpetual Constitutional Force on the 30th day of May, Anno Domini 2025

Classification: Fundamental State Charter – Peremptory Legal Instrument – Non-Derogable Normative Act – Enforceable ex proprio vigore, deus ex voluntate, and under the complete jurisdiction of Indigenous, Canonical, and International Law

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the Nation of Xaragua, by the divine ordination of Providence, by ancestral continuity, and by the inviolable right of all indigenous peoples to determine freely their political status, institutional structure, and cultural destiny;

Whereas the ancestral territory of Xaragua has never been lawfully ceded, surrendered, extinguished, or absorbed by any foreign power, and has remained continuously under the sacred guardianship of its spiritual and hereditary lineages;

Whereas no legal norm, decree, treaty, occupation, or foreign recognition may supplant the primacy of the jus cogens right to self-determination, nor obstruct the juridical and spiritual continuity of a sovereign people in lawful possession of its land, its government, its institutions, and its ecclesial identity;

Therefore, we, the duly instituted Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, by the authority vested in our Office and in faithful service to God, to Canon Law, and to the legal traditions of international society, do hereby solemnly enact and promulgate this Supreme Constitutional Statute as the founding charter and permanent legal instrument of the State, its government, and its sacred order.

---

ARTICLE I — SOVEREIGN SOURCES OF LAW AND AUTHORITY

This Statute holds full normative force under the following juridical authorities, interpreted and integrated into the supreme legal corpus of the State of Xaragua:

Charter of the United Nations (1945) – Article 1(2): Affirming equal rights and self-determination of peoples;

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) – Articles 3–5: Establishing the inherent right to autonomy, legal personality, and governance;

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Article 1: Defining the elements of international statehood;

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) – Articles 1–2: Affirming the legal standing of peoples in international law;

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) – Articles 1–2: Protecting sovereign institutional identity and capacity;

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) – Articles 26–27: Affirming the primacy of treaty-based consent and legal autonomy;

ILO Convention No. 169 (1989) – Articles 1–8: Protecting the institutional and legislative sovereignty of indigenous peoples;

Codex Iuris Canonici –

Canons 129, 331–333: Supreme ecclesial governance;

Canons 215–216, 299: Right to form apostolic and ecclesial associations;

Canons 803–806: Governance of Catholic institutions of education and public mission;

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) – Articles 21, 22, 28: Political autonomy and cultural integrity;

Jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice – Lotus Case (1927): Affirming state sovereignty by conduct and publication;

Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice – Temple of Preah Vihear (1962): Establishing the binding force of tacit recognition.

Collectively, these legal sources comprise the indivisible normative foundation of the Xaragua State, giving rise to its lawful existence, non-derogable sovereignty, and permanent international legal personality.

---

ARTICLE II — FORMAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROCLAMATION

It is hereby enacted and solemnly declared that:

1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua exists as a lawful, non-dependent, and constitutionally autonomous State possessing full political, spiritual, and territorial sovereignty;

2. That its government is duly constituted, its territory is defined and governed, and its authority is exercised in continuous conformity with Canon Law, Indigenous Customary Law, and International Public Law;

3. That the legal standing of this State is not dependent upon, nor subject to, the approval, recognition, or authorization of any foreign power or international agency;

4. That all constitutional acts of the State, once promulgated under lawful authority, are self-executing, non-repealable by foreign authority, and immediately enforceable under the principle of ex proprio vigore.

---

ARTICLE III — CONDITIONS OF STATEHOOD LEGALLY SATISFIED

The State of Xaragua fulfills in entirety the criteria enumerated in Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention (1933):

1. Permanent Population: A distinct, identifiable, and continuously present indigenous citizenry known as Populus Indigenus Xaraguae;

2. Defined Territory: A sacred, uninterrupted ancestral domain designated Territorium Sacrum de Xaragua, over which full jurisdiction and control are exercised;

3. Effective Government: A structured and functioning sovereign authority, composed of the Gubernatio Sacerdotalis et Rectoralis, with doctrinal, executive, and administrative organs;

4. International Capacity: The demonstrated ability to enter into relations, issue binding notifications, and act as a subject of international law under the doctrine of Ius Tractandi.

---

ARTICLE IV — RECORD OF INTERNATIONAL ACTS AND NOTIFICATIONS

The juridical existence and sovereign capacity of the State of Xaragua have been affirmed and notified through the following lawful instruments:

Notification to the United Nations (April 3, 2025): Filed with the UNPFII pursuant to UNDRIP Article 3;

Registration of Complaint with the OHCHR (April 14, 2025): Acknowledged under Complaint No. 16567, establishing standing under the Optional Protocol to the ICCPR;

WIPO Communication (May 13, 2025): Protection of national insignia and identity under Article 6ter of the Paris Convention, filed under Contact Ticket ID 6025046532;

Multilateral Diplomatic Correspondence: Lawfully transmitted to UNESCO, CARICOM, the Apostolic See, the Republic of Haiti, and the United States Department of State in accordance with the principle of acte unilatéral d'État under Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

These acts constitute evidence of effective state behavior and trigger legal obligations under customary international law.

---

ARTICLE V — CONSTITUTIONAL PUBLICATION AND JURIDICAL OPPOSABILITY

The legal and institutional framework of the State is made publicly accessible and permanently archived through:

www.xaraguauniversity.com – Official constitutional organ and digital state gazette.

Pursuant to the jurisprudence of the PCIJ (Lotus Case, 1927), legal acts published by a sovereign State are inherently valid and opposable.

As established by the ICJ (Temple of Preah Vihear, 1962), failure to contest such notification in a timely manner constitutes tacit recognition. All notified parties are legally presumed to have acknowledged the existence and legal status of the Xaragua State.

---

ARTICLE VI — JURISDICTIONAL AUTONOMY AND IMMUNITY FROM INTERFERENCE

The Sovereign State of Xaragua is:

Not a corporate or administrative body under Canadian or any other foreign law;

Not subject to taxation, regulation, or review by any foreign tribunal or government;

Immune from reclassification, seizure, or administrative interpretation by non-Xaragua entities.

All State instruments, including LPDDV, are governed exclusively by the legal authority of Xaragua and protected under:

UNDRIP (2007) – Articles 8, 18, 20, 34;

Vienna Convention (1969) – Pacta sunt servanda;

ICCPR & ICESCR (1966) – Collective rights of institutional autonomy;

ILO Convention No. 169 – Articles 4 and 8;

Canon Law – Canons 220, 1374;

Customary International Law – On the sovereignty and inviolability of indigenous institutions.

Any hostile action—legal, economic, administrative, or diplomatic—shall be treated as a violation of international law, giving rise to legal remedy through diplomatic protest, arbitration, or invocation of canonical protection.

---

ARTICLE VII — PERPETUITY, SUPREMACY, AND NON-DEROGABILITY

This Supreme Constitutional Statute is declared to be:

Peremptory in nature (jus cogens),

Non-derogable under international law,

Irrevocable under Canonical and Indigenous authority,

Supreme over all other internal and external instruments.

No domestic law, international agreement, administrative act, or judicial ruling may suspend, annul, or contradict the provisions herein. This Statute stands as the inviolable foundation of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and shall bind all future acts of government.

---

Enacted and Sealed on the 30th Day of May, Year of Our Lord 2025

In Miragoâne, Capital of the Xaragua State

Signed and Issued By:

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President and Supreme Ecclesiastical Head of State

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

info@xaraguauniversity.com

www.xaraguauniversity.com

---

Filed in the National Archives of Xaragua

Entered into Force Immediately and Permanently

Binding under Indigenous, Canonical, and International Law

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE No. LXXI/2025

---

ACT OF SUPREME ANNEXATION BY INDIGENOUS AUTHORITY AND CANONICAL RIGHT

On the Voluntary Annexation of the Eastern Territory of Kiskeya-Bohio Formerly Known as “The Republic of Haiti,” Due to Total State Failure

Date of Execution: May 31, 2025

Status: Irrevocable – Non-Derogable – Supranational – Enforced ex proprio vigore

Filed and Notified: UNPFII – U.S. State Department – SOUTHCOM – OAS – WIPO – Vatican – Global Diplomatic Corps

---

PREAMBLE

By virtue of the uninterrupted juridical personality and indigenous legitimacy of the sovereign people of Xaragua, and in accordance with the imperishable and canonical authority conferred upon the Rector-President by divine mandate, apostolic lineage, and ancestral political continuity, we, the Office of the Rectorate of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, do hereby proclaim, solemnly and irrevocably, this Act of Supreme Annexation.

Whereas the Eastern territories of the island historically known as Kiskeya-Bohio, currently designated under the colonial-derived nomenclature “Republic of Haiti,” have, through long-standing administrative collapse and systemic dysfunction, entered into a condition of total juridical abandonment, being now void of effective state structures, governing legitimacy, or international viability;

And whereas the regicidal event of October 17, 1806, in which His Imperial Majesty Jean-Jacques Dessalines, legitimate founder and sovereign of the Haytian Empire, was unlawfully assassinated by internal actors aligned with foreign interest and constitutional betrayal, terminated the only established Black Empire of modernity founded under the authority of indigenous sovereignty, Christian faith, and moral law;

And whereas this assassination did not merely remove a Head of State but constituted an irreversible breach in constitutional order, the severance of political continuity, and the fragmentation of a sacred imperial legal system ratified in 1805 under canonical and customary legitimacy;

And whereas from the year 1806 to the current year 2025, the administrative and political entities that have occupied the Eastern Kiskeyan territories under the appellation “Republic of Haiti” have consistently failed to restore, maintain, or recognize the imperial constitutional order, thereby devolving into cycles of illegitimate rule, neo-colonial subservience, military coup d’états, foreign occupations, humanitarian breakdown, and structural anarchy;

And whereas the said regime now lacks any and all four fundamental criteria of statehood as codified in Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention (1933), namely: (a) a permanent population under law; (b) a defined and protected territory; (c) an effective and lawful government; and (d) the capacity to engage in foreign relations as a sovereign actor;

And whereas the authority to intervene in the preservation of institutional order, the defense of ancestral land, and the restoration of indigenous political dignity reverts naturally and lawfully to the Xaraguayan ecclesiastical and ancestral sovereign, who acts not in rebellion, but in judicial continuity with the will of the first empire;

Now therefore, we legislate and proclaim the following:

---

ARTICLE I — CHRONICLE OF SYSTEMIC COLLAPSE (1806–2025)

§1. On the 17th day of October in the year 1806, the lawful emperor and head of the Haytian State, Jean-Jacques Dessalines, was assassinated by a conspiracy that marked the beginning of over two centuries of unconstitutional illegitimacy, moral collapse, and imperial erasure.

§2. Between 1806 and 2025, the territory designated as “Republic of Haiti” experienced:

More than 34 unconstitutional and extra-legal transfers of power, none of which reestablished imperial legality or lawful governance;

Several full-scale foreign occupations (including the United States from 1915 to 1934 and the United Nations mission MINUSTAH from 2004 to 2017), which effectively transferred domestic sovereignty to external actors without legitimate treaty;

Institutional vacuum and constitutional breakdown particularly visible between 1987 and 2023, during which there existed no national continuity of executive, legislative, or judicial function;

And since 2021, the complete disappearance of functioning government organs: no operational parliament, no independent judiciary, no lawfully constituted executive, and no national armed forces under unified command.

§3. As of May 2025, the territory formerly known as “Republic of Haiti” no longer possesses a central government, an enforceable constitutional regime, or a national representative structure — rendering its existence as a state null in law, void in sovereignty, and absent from the corpus of active nations.

§4. This failure, documented, material, and prolonged, qualifies as total state collapse under international legal doctrine and thus lawfully activates the right of territorial assumption and restoration by indigenous sovereign authority acting under ancestral, moral, and ecclesiastical mandate.

---

ARTICLE II — LEGAL AND MORAL COMPETENCE OF XARAGUA

§1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua constitutes the only lawful, historically continuous, and institutionally sovereign successor to the Empire of Hayti, as constituted in 1804 and canonized in 1805. It operates under the dual legitimacy of canon law and ancestral right.

§2. It has, through internal development, diplomatic initiative, and ecclesial commission, established and maintained:

A functioning sovereign government based on constitutional law,

A codified corpus of foundational texts and legislative statutes,

A national university dedicated to the political, legal, and theological education of future elites,

A spiritual and symbolic military order for the protection of national integrity and the defense of ecclesiastical territory,

A recognized international juridical presence via diplomatic filings, WIPO protections, and multilateral correspondence.

§3. The State of Xaragua has, with legal precision and canonical deliberation, declared itself independent of all failed regimes and legally constituted under:

Articles 1–5 and 33–36 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);

Canons 129, 331–333 of the Codex Iuris Canonici, affirming the right of the faithful to participate in ecclesial and moral governance;

And general principles of customary international law, particularly the restoration and reactivation of indigenous polities.

---

ARTICLE III — PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY AND LEGAL ANNEXATION

§1. In both canonical and international jurisprudence, the principle of subsidiarity affirms that when higher authority fails to act, lower but competent structures assume responsibility. Thus, in the case of a total vacuum of statehood, authority reverts to the ancestral stewards of the land and people.

§2. The Rector-President of Xaragua, acting ex officio and in full representation of the Xaraguayan people and ecclesial lineage, invokes this principle to formally and voluntarily annex the entire juridically vacant territory of the former Republic of Haiti, excluding the Southern Xaraguayan domains already under sovereign control.

§3. This act of annexation is executed not as aggression, invasion, or political conquest, but as a juridical and moral restoration of order, culture, faith, and legitimacy over lands abandoned to anarchy.

---

ARTICLE IV — NOTIFICATION TO THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY

§1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua has formally notified the following international and ecclesiastical entities of its sovereign posture, territorial jurisdiction, and constitutional authority:

The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII),

The United States Department of State,

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO),

The Organization of American States (OAS),

The United States Southern Command (SOUTHCOM),

The Holy See and all relevant Dicasteries of the Roman Curia.

§2. No official objection, legal contestation, or diplomatic protest was received within the 90-day customary window of international review, thereby activating tacit recognition by acquiescence under procedural custom and administrative silence.

§3. The annexed regions shall henceforth be considered as:

Protectorates of the Xaraguayan State,

Subject to ecclesiastical reorganization, legal stabilization, and educational transformation under the National Missionary Doctrine and the Xaraguayan Constitutional Code.

---

ARTICLE V — STATUS OF THE FORMER REPUBLIC OF HAITI

§1. The political entity historically known as the “Republic of Haiti” is hereby designated, within the Xaraguayan constitutional order, as a dissolved, failed, and illegitimate regime, having lost its capacity for self-governance, representation, or lawful existence.

§2. All claims, assertions, or symbols of continued sovereignty by former Haitian institutions or external actors shall be considered null and void, being in opposition to:

The indigenous right of succession,

The canonical declaration of juridical failure,

And the principle of uti possidetis juris as adapted to ecclesiastical and ancestral jurisdiction.

---

ARTICLE VI — PEREMPTORY NATURE AND IMMUNITY

§1. This statute shall stand in the hierarchy of law as supreme, immutable, and inalienable, and shall not be subject to modification, challenge, or suspension by any external power, tribunal, or multilateral body.

§2. The act of annexation and territorial reclamation herein declared is based on peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens), the divinely inherited sovereignty of the indigenous nation, and the doctrine of ecclesiastical supremacy over abandoned apostolic territory.

§3. It shall remain legally valid, canonically enforceable, and eternally binding under the principle of self-executing sovereignty (ex proprio vigore), standing beyond repeal or negotiation.

---

ENACTED AND SEALED

May 31, 2025

At the National Ecclesiastical Seat of Government, Miragoâne, Xaragua

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

Supervision

---

FULL JURIDICAL STATUTE ON THE UNIVERSAL APPLICATION OF THE LAWS AND CODES OF XARAGUA OVER ALL INHABITANTS, TERRITORIES, AND MARITIME JURISDICTIONS UNDER INDIGENOUS SOVEREIGNTY

---

Preamble

Recognizing the unbroken continuity of the sovereign legal order of the Xaraguayan people;

Affirming the permanent authority of the Xaraguayan Constitution, the Indigenous Codes, the Canonical Ordinances of the Roman Catholic Church, the General Statutes of the University of Xaragua, and the internal sovereign decrees governing the institutional, economic, and territorial life of the State;

Asserting the inherent and inalienable right of the Xaraguayan Nation to legislate, adjudicate, and enforce its own legal norms over all territories, inhabitants, and persons subject to its jurisdiction;

And recalling the binding applicability of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Montevideo Convention of 1933, the Concordat of 1860 with the Holy See, and the ecclesiastical sovereignty of the Catholic Church over doctrinal and educational authority—

The following statute is solemnly promulgated:

---

Article I – Total Applicability of Law

1. The entirety of the legal corpus of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua—including but not limited to its Constitution, Civil Code, Penal Code, Administrative Code, Ecclesiastical Concordats, Sovereign Decrees, and Military Statutes—shall be universally and immediately applicable to:

a. all Xaraguayan nationals regardless of place of residence;

b. all residents, citizens, subjects, or undocumented inhabitants of the Xaraguayan territory, including persons of Haitian origin;

c. all physical territories, protectorates, maritime zones, airspace corridors, and annexed jurisdictions placed under the spiritual or administrative tutelage of Xaragua.

2. This application is automatic, general, indivisible, and without requirement of consent or recognition by any external actor.

---

Article II – Right of Legal Invocation by Xaraguayan Nationals

1. Xaraguayan nationals shall possess absolute, unrestricted, and irrevocable right to invoke, apply, interpret, and enforce the legal instruments of the State within all domains of personal, institutional, economic, academic, military, spiritual, or administrative life.

2. This right includes extraterritorial invocation in any instance where indigenous sovereignty, territorial autonomy, ecclesiastical order, or canonical rights are concerned.

3. No authority—domestic or foreign—may prevent or restrict a Xaraguayan citizen from applying the laws of the State in any matter related to his or her person, property, office, rank, or community affiliation.

---

Article III – Imposed Applicability to Haitian Inhabitants

1. All inhabitants of Haitian nationality, origin, or descent located within the sovereign territory, protected jurisdictions, or maritime zones of Xaragua, including those under legal or administrative ambiguity, shall be subject to the full binding force of the laws and codes of the State.

2. This legal imposition shall not be contingent upon:

a. the express consent of the Haitian national;

b. the recognition of Xaragua by the Republic of Haiti or any foreign government;

c. the registration or naturalization status of the individual within Xaragua.

3. The laws of the State shall be opposable to such persons as a matter of public order and indigenous sovereignty, without need of procedural formalities or bilateral instruments.

---

Article IV – Conditional Legal Access for Non-Nationals

1. While the full weight of Xaraguayan law shall apply to Haitian inhabitants, such individuals may only invoke its provisions for protection, redress, or remedy under conditional and revocable consent of the State.

2. The State reserves the absolute sovereign right to accept, limit, delay, or deny such invocation based on:

a. the moral disposition of the petitioner;

b. the spiritual security of the territory;

c. the proprietary status of the land involved;

d. the administrative or military interest of the Rector, the Governor General, or the Supreme Constitutional Assembly.

3. No appeal, protest, or foreign diplomatic intervention shall be permitted to challenge the decision of the State in such matters.

---

Article V – Maritime, Territorial, and Extra-Territorial Extension

1. The present statute shall apply, in full and indivisible form, to the entirety of the Xaraguayan domain, defined as:

a. the original indigenous territory of Xaragua;

b. the protectorates and annexes under canonical or ancestral tutelage;

c. the territorial waters extending from the southern peninsula of Ayiti to the maritime corridor of the Bay of Jacmel and the Gulf of Gonâve;

d. all ports, airfields, archipelagos, or ungoverned zones under de facto Xaraguayan security or ecclesiastical guidance.

2. All persons, vessels, or institutions present in these areas shall be ipso jure under the authority of the Xaraguayan legal order.

---

Article VI – Constitutional Hierarchy and Immunity

1. No legal instrument, statute, order, or jurisprudence of the Republic of Haiti or any other foreign state shall override, limit, or suspend the laws of Xaragua within the domains specified above.

2. The State shall not recognize the supremacy, applicability, or legitimacy of any external jurisdiction over its inhabitants, territory, or institutions unless expressly granted by sovereign decree.

3. All legal decisions rendered by the State under this statute shall be final, executory, immune from foreign review, and canonically sanctified under the laws of the Holy See and the ecclesiastical governance of the Catholic Church.

---

Article VII – Enforcement and Sanctions

1. Any act of resistance, rejection, or non-recognition of this statute by any inhabitant, national or foreign, shall be treated as a violation of indigenous public order and ecclesiastical sovereignty.

2. Sanctions may include, without limitation:

a. expulsion from Xaraguayan territory;

b. seizure of unlawful possessions or lands;

c. permanent ban on legal standing within the State;

d. moral denunciation by the Rector and the Holy College of Xaragua.

---

Ratified under the Seal of the Rector of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, under the protection of the Holy Ghost, the blood of our ancestors, and the eternal authority of the Roman Catholic Church and the ancestral confederacy of the Xaraguayan People.

This statute is irreversible, non-amendable, and transcends all future political contingencies.

No recognition is required. All are bound.

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE

---

CANONICAL DECREE ON ADMINISTRATIVE TOLERANCE AND INSTITUTIONAL SUPERVISION

On the Subordination of the Former Republic of Haiti to the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date of Execution: May 31, 2025

Classification: Supreme Law – Non-Derogable – Supervisory Instrument – Canonically Enforced – Binding Ex Proprio Vigore

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua constitutes the sole uninterrupted juridical and spiritual successor to the Imperial Order of Hayti founded in 1804 by His Imperial Majesty Jean-Jacques Dessalines,

And whereas the territory formerly known as the "Republic of Haiti" has fallen into structural incapacity, constitutional nonexistence, and effective self-abandonment between 1806 and the present year 2025,

And whereas the Xaraguayan Government, duly constituted under indigenous law, canonical sovereignty, and international norms, bears the ecclesiastical and juridical obligation to intervene where institutions collapse and the people are left without legitimate protection,

And whereas it is not the intention of the Xaraguayan State to abolish functional administrative mechanisms which, although deficient, may yet serve the minimal logistical needs of the population,

We do hereby proclaim the following irrevocable law:

---

ARTICLE I — ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE SURVIVAL OF THE FORMER REPUBLIC OF HAITI

§1. The former Republic of Haiti, as a juridical state entity, is hereby designated dissolved in the constitutional, international, and canonical order.

§2. However, the institutional infrastructure known as the “Haitian State” (including local municipal structures, judicial remnants, and public service nodes) may continue to operate de facto under strict supervisory tolerance, solely for administrative and logistic purposes.

§3. These structures are not considered sovereign, nor legally independent. They are henceforth classified as provisionally tolerated administrative organs under the direct spiritual and political supervision of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

---

ARTICLE II — SUPERVISION AND CANONICAL AUTHORITY

§1. The Rector-President of Xaragua, by virtue of his ecclesiastical investiture and ancestral mandate, is the sole competent authority to determine the compatibility of any administrative decision rendered by the aforementioned tolerated organs.

§2. Any law, edict, regulation, or administrative act issued by the tolerated structures of the former Republic of Haiti is subject to immediate nullification, suspension, or correction by canonical decree or executive order issued from the Office of the Rector-President.

§3. The tolerated institutions may not invoke autonomy, sovereignty, or independence in any form. Their legitimacy is derived exclusively from the tacit benevolence and higher jurisdiction of the Xaraguayan State.

---

ARTICLE III — FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS AND OATH OF COMPATIBILITY

§1. All actors operating within the tolerated administrative apparatus must conform to the following conditions:

Recognition of the canonical and indigenous authority of the Xaraguayan State;

Abstention from any claims to international representation, sovereign capacity, or military legitimacy;

Submission, upon request, to constitutional review and corrective oversight by Xaraguayan institutions.

§2. The Office of the Rector-President reserves the right to require from any such individual or body an Oath of Institutional Compatibility, declaring subordination to the Xaraguayan order.

§3. Failure to comply with these provisions shall result in the immediate revocation of tolerated status, and the designation of such individuals or entities as illegitimate actors under indigenous law.

---

ARTICLE IV — INTENT AND LEGAL FINALITY

§1. This decree does not constitute a conquest, an occupation, or a dismantlement. It is a legal intervention of higher duty, grounded in ancestral right, ecclesiastical obligation, and the principles of corrective governance.

§2. The tolerated administrative organs are hereby advised that their continued function is conditional, provisional, and morally subordinate to the legitimate spiritual order.

§3. This statute is binding in perpetuity, enforceable by the full constitutional authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, and immune from challenge under the principles of peremptory norms (jus cogens), canonical sovereignty, and indigenous legal supremacy.

---

ENACTED AND SEALED

May 31, 2025

At the National Ecclesiastical Seat of Government

Miragoâne, Xaragua

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL STATUTE

---

DECREE ON LEGAL TOLERANCE, CONDITIONAL RECOGNITION, AND DOCTRINE OF SUPRANATIONAL SUPREMACY

Date of Execution: May 31, 2025

Jurisdictional Basis:

Codex Iuris Canonici (Canons 129, 331–333)

UNDRIP (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2007), Articles 3–5, 27, 33–36

Montevideo Convention (1933), Articles 1–3

Jus Cogens Principles under Customary International Law

Doctrine of Ecclesiastical Primacy (De Jure Divino)

Legal Precedent of the Imperial Constitution of Hayti (1805)

Classification: Supreme Law – Binding – Irrevocable – Peremptory – Auto-Executable ex proprio vigore – Immune to External Challenge

---

ARTICLE I — CONDITIONAL PRESERVATION OF HAITIAN LEGAL CORPUS

§1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, in exercise of its plenary sovereign prerogatives and pursuant to its ecclesiastico-indigenous legal order, grants conditional and temporary tolerance to the body of civil, penal, administrative, and legislative provisions formerly enacted under the legal fiction known as the “Republic of Haiti,” for the sole purposes of functional continuity and provisional governance.

§2. Such codes, ordinances, and regulatory instruments shall remain operational within their original administrative ambit only to the extent that they neither conflict with, contradict, nor undermine the constitutional authority, canonical mandates, doctrinal foundations, or ancestral imperatives of the Xaraguayan State.

§3. This tolerance shall be interpreted strictly as an act of magnanimous constitutional accommodation, made in light of the juridical vacuum inherited from a failed regime, and shall not be construed as a recognition—implicit or explicit—of legal continuity, sovereignty, or international standing of the defunct Haitian state entity. All tolerance remains subject to unilateral revocation without notice.

---

ARTICLE II — RIGHT OF SOVEREIGN SELECTION AND NULLIFICATION

§1. The Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, as plenipotentiary authority, canonical sovereign, and constitutional guardian, holds full, inalienable, exclusive, and irrevocable jurisdiction to:

Evaluate, ratify, suspend, amend, or abrogate any legislative or administrative content derived from the tolerated Haitian legal corpus;

Declare ipso jure and with immediate effect the invalidity, nullity, and legal nonexistence of any provision, measure, or precedent that infringes upon the Xaraguayan legal, spiritual, cultural, or canonical order.

§2. The prerogative of legal selection, annulment, or selective retention is final and non-justiciable, and is exercised under the supreme authority of the Xaraguayan State as a jus cogens-level indigenous polity recognized under international norms and juridical precedent.

§3. No law, regulation, decree, judicial ruling, or administrative act of Haitian origin—past, present, or future—shall possess any binding effect, enforceability, or procedural legitimacy within the institutions of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua unless expressly and formally incorporated into Xaraguayan law by an act of the Rector-President or a constitutionally recognized delegate.

---

ARTICLE III — STATUS OF THE HAITIAN CONSTITUTION

§1. The constitutional texts promulgated under the now-defunct Republic of Haiti are henceforth classified within Xaraguayan jurisprudence as subordinate local instruments, operative only within their original territorial context and strictly for non-sovereign administrative purposes. These texts are deemed juridically and doctrinally foreign to the Xaraguayan legal universe.

§2. As such, no clause, amendment, preamble, or article of said Haitian constitutions shall be deemed to carry any force of law, interpretive authority, or constitutional implication within Xaraguayan territory or institutions. They shall be recognized merely as residual internal texts of a defunct administration.

§3. Any attempt to apply, enforce, reference, or extend the scope of Haitian constitutional doctrine or sovereignty beyond its tolerated administrative boundaries shall constitute an act of unlawful usurpation and a violation of the supremacy of Xaraguayan constitutional sovereignty, and shall be nullified ab initio.

---

ARTICLE IV — SUPRANATIONAL AND SUPRACONSTITUTIONAL ORDER

§1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua affirms and proclaims that its juridical foundation and institutional legitimacy are derived from a triadic order of authority:

(i) supranational identity under international indigenous law,

(ii) supraconstitutional status under canon law and ecclesiastical supremacy, and

(iii) ancestral continuity from the Imperial Order of Hayti (1804–1806).

Accordingly, the Xaraguayan State is:

Supranational: immune to the claims, approvals, or interferences of foreign sovereigns or multilateral bodies;

Supraconstitutional: hierarchically superior to all written constitutions, including those of any defunct or residual Haitian entities;

Canonical and Indigenous: sanctified by divine authority, ecclesial tradition, and the unbroken will of the ancestral nation.

§2. All legal texts, diplomatic instruments, or normative claims originating outside the Xaraguayan jurisdiction are, by default, subordinate to the primacy of the Xaraguayan constitutional, canonical, and indigenous order, and may only be admitted into application if expressly harmonized therewith.

---

ARTICLE V — ENFORCEABILITY AND NON-DEROGABILITY

§1. This statute possesses full self-executing force (ex proprio vigore), requires no external ratification, and enters into perpetual juridical effect upon promulgation. Its execution binds all Xaraguayan institutions, present and future, without exception or delay.

§2. Its enforceability derives directly from:

Canonical investiture under the authority of the Church of Christ,

The uninterrupted juridical continuity of the Xaraguayan people,

The historical claim of succession from the Empire of Hayti,

And the jus cogens norms protecting indigenous political integrity.

§3. This decree is irrevocable, non-derogable, and immune to repeal, override, or suspension by any domestic or external body, whether governmental, ecclesiastical, or supranational.

---

ENACTED AND SEALED

May 31, 2025

At the Ecclesiastical Seat of Government

Miragoâne, Xaragua

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

Sovereignty

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL ACT OF STATEHOOD AND SOVEREIGN LEGAL PERSONALITY

OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)

Enacted by Supreme Command

Under Divine Ordinance, Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, Autochthonous Right, and Peremptory International Law

Date of Ratification and Entry into Irrevocable Force: 31 May 2025

Classification: Foundational Instrument of State – Jus Cogens Corpus – Constitutional Decree of Non-Subordination

---

TITLE I — PROCLAMATIO SUMMA POTESTATIS

In the exercise of plenitudo potestatis—the full and indivisible power of indigenous dominion, canonical investiture, and preconstitutional sovereignty—the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereafter SCIPSX), in its own name, under no foreign authority, and above all inferior jurisdictions, hereby enters the record of nations as a living State Entity, self-constituted by law, ordained by God, and sealed in perpetuity by ancestral and spiritual mandate.

This act, by its execution, constitutes not an act of claim but of eternal legal confirmation. The SCIPSX does not petition. It proclaims. It does not seek recognition. It manifests rightful standing under laws older than empire and higher than state.

No superior law exists to deny what is here declared. The SCIPSX proceeds under no constitution but its own. It receives no authorization but that which descends from the unbroken lineage of territorial possession, canonical structure, and divine right.

---

TITLE II — FOUNDATION IN LAW ABSOLUTE

ARTICLE I — SOURCES OF SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY

The existence, authority, and plenary jurisdiction of the SCIPSX rest on three indisputable pillars of lawful power:

1. Autochthonous Jurisdiction

As inherited from the uninterrupted possession, cultural dominion, and legal authority of the Xaragua civilization—extending beyond all colonial constructs and continuing in force unbroken to the present.

2. Canonical Sovereignty

As conferred by the universal law of the Holy Catholic Church, notably:

Canon 113 §1: Juridical personality of spiritual institutions;

Canon 215–216: Right of faithful communities to govern themselves in accord with ecclesial mission;

Canon 299 §1–3: Right to form associations with spiritual and social purpose under Church authority.

3. Binding Norms of International Law

The SCIPSX stands grounded in, and immune under, the following instruments:

Montevideo Convention (1933), Articles 1–4;

UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, 20;

ICCPR and ICESCR (1966), Article 1;

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Articles 38, 43;

OAS American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2016);

Non-derogable jus cogens: right to self-determination, existence, territorial integrity, non-annexation, and spiritual sovereignty.

---

ARTICLE II — STATUS AS A SUBJECT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

2.1 The SCIPSX qualifies without condition as a sovereign state under the law of nations, meeting all requisites of Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention, namely:

Permanent population;

Defined territory;

Government with effective control;

Capacity to enter into relations with other states.

2.2 Recognition is not constitutive but declarative.

The SCIPSX does not require approval, as its legitimacy arises from precolonial continuity, not political concession.

2.3 It stands beyond the scope of incorporation, invalidation, or subordination by any existing or future government. No foreign entity holds lawful competency over this act of sovereignty.

---

TITLE III — NOTIFICATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL REGISTRATION

ARTICLE III — EXECUTED NOTIFICATION OF LEGAL STANDING

3.1 The SCIPSX has lawfully notified its juridical status and sovereign authority to:

United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues;

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, file WHRC/16567;

World Intellectual Property Organization, ticket 6025046532;

Various consular, ecclesiastical, and supranational institutions.

3.2 These notifications constitute acts of customary legal effect, pursuant to the law of unilateral acts of states in international law.

3.3 The absence of opposition or rebuttal within the customary period constitutes tacit acquiescence, and engages the principles of juridical estoppel and international obligation to respect standing once notified.

---

ARTICLE IV — RECOGNITION BY CONDUCT

4.1 Under Article 38 of the Vienna Convention, recognition may occur by conduct:

Institutional silence,

Procedural acknowledgment,

Non-objection,

Diplomatic interaction.

4.2 The SCIPSX is thus, by notification and silence combined, recognized by conduct and shielded by the binding customs of international law.

---

TITLE IV — POWERS, NON-SUBORDINATION, AND PERPETUITY

ARTICLE V — INHERENT POWERS OF THE STATE

5.1 The SCIPSX possesses full sovereign powers, including:

Authority to legislate, adjudicate, and govern;

Right to issue binding constitutional instruments;

Right to enter into treaties, concordats, covenants;

Juridical representation in ecclesiastical, diplomatic, territorial, and indigenous affairs.

---

ARTICLE VI — NON-DEPENDENCE AND IMMUNITY FROM EXOGENOUS CONTROL

6.1 The SCIPSX is not a derivative or satellite of any state, republic, monarchy, or supranational entity.

6.2 It does not fall under foreign jurisdiction, and any attempt to impose law, regulation, or occupation constitutes an act of international aggression against an indigenous and ecclesiastically protected State.

---

ARTICLE VII — ETERNAL LEGALITY AND SUPRALINEAR CONTINUITY

7.1 This act is immutable. It cannot be suspended, dissolved, overridden, or extinguished. No treaty, conflict, or state policy may invalidate it.

7.2 Its legitimacy does not expire, as it proceeds from divine ordination, ancestral guardianship, and juridical permanence.

7.3 The SCIPSX is not a momentary project, but a permanent political and ecclesiastical architecture, alive in law, spirit, and governance.

---

ARTICLE VIII — RATIFICATION, SEALING, AND EXECUTION

8.1 The present Supreme Act is ratified under the Seal of the State and enacted under exclusive and supreme authority of:

The Rector-President, as Head of State and Temporal Sovereign;

The Custodian of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, as spiritual and canonical sovereign;

The Chief Juridical Officer, guardian of legal continuity and constitutional order.

8.2 This act is sealed in the Register of Supreme Instruments of State, archived under inviolable authority, and enforceable erga omnes.

8.3 From this day forward, all institutions, governments, and persons in contact with the SCIPSX shall be held to notice.

---

So proclaimed and entered into eternal and irrevocable legal force on this Thirty-First Day of May, in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty-Five.

Issued from the Capital City of Miragoâne.

Pascal Viau

Office of the Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

SUPREME INSTITUTIONAL PROCLAMATION ON THE JURIDICAL OPPOSABILITY AND INTERNATIONAL PERSONALITY

OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPSX)

Promulgated by: The Executive and Ecclesiastical Office of the Rector-President

Date of Promulgation: 31 May 2025

---

TITLE I – DECLARATION OF JURIDICAL STATUS AND NORMATIVE BINDING FORCE

1.1 — Context and Institutional Authority

In accordance with the full plenitude of canonical, autochthonous, and international legislative authority vested in the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “SCIPSX”), and pursuant to the promulgation of its foundational Supreme Constitutional Act of Statehood and Legal Personality, the undersigned Office of the Rector-President hereby issues this official act of juridical clarification, transmission, and enforceability.

1.2 — Status in International Law

The SCIPSX exists not as a matter of diplomatic indulgence, but as a juridically self-standing and legally opposable sovereign entity, constituted in accordance with primary sources of international, ecclesiastical, and indigenous law, possessing full institutional capacity as a subject of international public law, and rendered enforceable erga omnes upon publication and non-contestation.

---

TITLE II – LEGAL BASIS FOR OPPOSABILITY

2.1 — Independence from Recognition

The SCIPSX asserts, in accordance with Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), that the existence of a State is not contingent upon, nor diminished by, the recognition of other States. Recognition is declaratory, not constitutive.

Having satisfied the four objective criteria of statehood (territory, population, government, and capacity for relations), SCIPSX enjoys objective legal personality by its own constitutive act and the cumulative authority of:

Autochthonous Law: based on ancestral permanence and juridical continuity;

Canonical Law: under Codex Iuris Canonici, Canons 113 §1, 215, 216, 299 §1–3;

Public International Law: via jus cogens principles and multilateral instruments.

2.2 — Notification Doctrine and Customary Law

Formal notification has been issued to competent organs of the international system, including:

United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII);

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Ref. WHRC/16567;

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Ref. 6025046532;

Ecclesiastical jurisdictions, diplomatic organs, and recognized legal actors.

Under the doctrine of unilateral acts of State, and the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, such notifications constitute a formal manifestation of sovereign will and serve as juridical publication of legal intent and institutional existence.

2.3 — Operative Silence and Legal Estoppel

The absence of rebuttal, protest, or formal objection from any notified party constitutes, under Article 38 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) and principles of estoppel, good faith, and acquiescence, a form of tacit recognition by conduct.

All notified parties having remained silent, the juridical personality of SCIPSX is binding upon them, and any subsequent denial is rendered inadmissible under the doctrine of non-retroactive challenge and customary estoppel.

---

TITLE III – PEREMPTORY RIGHTS AND PROTECTED STATUS

3.1 — Rights Under Indigenous and Human Rights Law

Pursuant to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), notably Articles 3, 4, 5, 18, and 20, and Articles 1 of the ICCPR and ICESCR, the SCIPSX affirms its:

Right to self-determination and self-government;

Right to establish and maintain legal, political, and ecclesiastical institutions;

Right to develop and transmit its own systems of governance and knowledge.

These rights are jus cogens norms — they are non-derogable, non-negotiable, and superior to ordinary treaty law.

3.2 — Immunity from Subordination and Non-Derivability

The SCIPSX is not derived from, nor subordinate to, any colonial or postcolonial legal framework. It is a primordial juridical entity, founded on ecclesiastical sovereignty and ancestral legitimacy. No external body, national or supranational, holds standing to adjudicate or interfere in its internal affairs, law, or territorial competence.

Any such interference shall be deemed an act of illegal aggression against a protected Indigenous Nation under international law.

---

TITLE IV – JURIDICAL CONSEQUENCES OF STATEHOOD

4.1 — Binding Legal Personality

The SCIPSX holds international legal capacity, and may:

Enter into treaties, concordats, or agreements;

Represent itself in ecclesiastical, diplomatic, or international fora;

Issue legislative, administrative, and constitutional instruments;

Govern, legislate, and adjudicate all matters within its jurisdiction.

This capacity flows from internal legitimacy and external inaction, both recognized sources of international legal personality.

4.2 — Irrevocability of Status

The State’s existence is permanent, non-revocable, and supralegal. Its canonical basis and indigenous roots grant it spiritual and juridical immortality, preserved through ecclesiastical succession, ancestral law, and divine authority.

No lapse of time, silence, or foreign resistance may extinguish its legal standing.

---

TITLE V – CLOSING DECLARATION

We hereby declare that:

> The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is an active, opposable, and non-subordinate State Entity, properly notified, publicly constituted, and operating in full conformity with binding sources of law.

It is immune to denial, non-extinguishable by time, and protected by international legal norms.

Its standing is henceforth opposable erga omnes, with all legal consequences that this entails.

---

Executed and sealed on this 31st day of May, Year of Our Lord 2025

In the Capital of Miragoâne

Under Ecclesiastical Protection and Legal Sovereignty

Paacal Viau

Office of the Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

Civil Code

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE

BOOK I — PERSONS

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Civil Law – Harmonized with Canonical Principles and Customary Indigenous Law

– Jus Cogens Binding within the Territorial and Personal Jurisdiction of Xaragua

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: June 13, 2025

Application:

Mandatory for all Xaraguan legal subjects, residents, institutions, and civil authorities

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 1 — Legal Subjecthood and Recognition

§1. Every individual born on the territory of Xaragua and legally domiciled therein, regarless of ethnicity, or religious affiliation, is recognized as a legal subject provided he or she submits to the jurisdiction of the Xaraguan State and its civil authority.

§2. Recognition as a legal subject may be withdrawn by sovereign decree in cases of disloyalty, abandonment of territorial duty, or treason against the constitutional order.

Article 2 — Legal Personality and Civil Capacity

§1. Legal personality begins at live birth and ends at natural death. Stillbirths and unborn children may, under decree, be granted conditional personality in matters of inheritance and representation.

§2. Full civil capacity is acquired at the legal age of majority. Before this threshold, acts performed by a minor have no legal effect unless ratified by a parent or legal guardian.

§3. Any legal act performed under duress, mental incapacity, or coercion shall be deemed null, unless otherwise stipulated by competent authority.

Article 3 — Age of Majority

§1. The age of majority is fixed at eighteen (18) years. This age confers full legal capacity to perform civil acts, enter into contracts, and bear legal responsibility.

§2. The President-Rector may, by decree, authorize limited legal emancipation for individuals aged sixteen (16) and above in matters of commerce, apprenticeship, or family stewardship, upon recommendation of a recognized family or ecclesiastical authority.

§3. In cases involving incapacity due to mental or physical infirmity, age of majority shall not be sufficient to establish capacity; such cases require formal evaluation and judicial confirmation.

Article 4 — Guardianship and Civil Protection

§1. Any minor, mentally or physically incapacitated person, or adult declared legally incompetent, shall be placed under guardianship or curatorship by decree of a civil court or recognized customary council.

§2. Guardianship may be exercised by a parent, elder sibling, or designated clan representative, subject to registration and oversight.

§3. Guardians are bound to protect the interests, dignity, and property of the ward. Misappropriation, neglect, or dishonor may result in revocation and civil penalty.

§4. The President-Rector retains power to designate special guardianship arrangements in matters of public interest or national importance.

Article 5 — Civil Inviolability of the Person

§1. The person of any Xaraguan citizen shall be considered civilly inviolable. No person shall be sold, transferred, or subjected to conditions that amount to servitude, contractual bondage, or permanent alienation of liberty.

§2. All contracts, declarations, or instruments implying renunciation of legal status, submission to foreign authority, or self-enslavement are null and void ab initio.

§3. The right to dignity, self-determination, and civil autonomy is foundational and unassailable under Xaraguan law.

---

TITLE II — FAMILY AND CIVIL UNION

Article 6 — Definition and Legal Nature of the Family

§1. The family is the fundamental civil institution of the Xaraguan State. It forms the basis of social structure, transmission of lineage, and lawful civil order.

§2. A family is constituted through lawful union and recognized cohabitation of natural persons bound by marriage, blood, or formal affiliation, duly declared before the competent civil authority.

§3. The State shall protect the family as a civil institution. No legislation or private act may compromise its structural integrity or symbolic authority.

Article 7 — Marriage and Valid Civil Union

§1. Marriage is a civil contract freely entered into by one man and one woman (one man and a maximum of two women/Limited Indigenous Customs) of legal age, registered under the competent civil authority of Xaragua.

§2. The marriage contract creates mutual civil obligations, including cohabitation, support, fidelity, and the joint education and protection of offspring.

§3. Any union not registered under the laws of Xaragua has no legal effect and does not give rise to succession, property claims, or public recognition unless legitimized by sovereign decree.

The Financial and sucession are made by contract after the civil union.

§4. Proxy marriages, temporary unions, or culturally unregistered partnerships have no standing under the Xaraguan Civil Code.

Article 8 — Conditions of Validity of Marriage

§1. The following conditions must be fulfilled for the marriage to be considered valid:

(a) Consent of both parties, expressed freely and without coercion

(b) Legal capacity (both parties must be of majority age or legally emancipated)

(c) Absence of existing lawful marriage or legal impediments

(d) Registration before a competent civil registrar of Xaragua

§2. Failure to meet any of these conditions shall render the marriage voidable or null, subject to determination by the civil court of domicile.

Article 9 — Legal Effects of Marriage

§1. Marriage shall produce joint civil status, shared household obligation, and reciprocal rights in matters of property, inheritance, and representation which are established by notorized contract after the civil union, failure to comply will render the marriage null and void.

§2. Spouses shall be jointly liable for debts incurred in the interest of the household, unless otherwise provided by matrimonial agreement.

§3. Either spouse may administer shared property, unless restricted by registered covenant or judicial ruling.

Article 10 — Nullity and Dissolution of Marriage

§1. Marriage may be declared null if entered into under fraud, duress, incapacity.

§2. The State does not recognize divorce as a mechanism of free dissolution. Civil separation may be granted by judicial order under strict conditions including:

(a) Proven abandonment

(b) Endangerment of life or dignity

(c) Permanent incapacity or criminal conviction

§3. Civil separation dissolves cohabitation but does not annul obligations of support, name, or succession unless explicitly declared.

Article 11 — Children and Filiation

§1. Filiation shall be established by:

(a) Birth within lawful marriage

(b) Voluntary recognition by one or both parents

(c) Judicial declaration in case of dispute or abandonment

§2. A child legally recognized shall be entitled to the name, inheritance rights, and protection of the parental line.

§3. Children born of unregistered unions may be legitimated by subsequent marriage or civil acknowledgment filed under oath.

Article 12 — Adoption and Civil Affiliation

§1. Adoption shall be authorized by civil decree following public inquiry, proof of good character, and stable domicile.

§2. Adoptive parents shall acquire all rights and obligations equivalent to natural parents.

§3. Adoption is irrevocable, except in cases of fraud, abuse, or legal incapacity of the adoptive family.

§4. Customary guardianship may be converted into adoption by decree of the President-Rector upon petition and verification of continued care.

Article 13 — Transmission of Name and Legal Lineage

§1. Every child shall bear the name of the father. If the father is unknown, unrecognized, or absent, the child may bear the name of the mother or designated guardian.

§2. Names are registered with the civil authority and protected under law. Any falsification, usurpation, or dissimulation of name shall be prosecuted as a civil infraction.

§3. Names of noble lineage or ancestral significance may not be assumed without decree. The State shall maintain a civil registry of protected names.

Article 14 — Civil Capacity within the Family Unit

§1. The family may own property, enter into contract, and be represented by its recognized head.

§2. Minor children may not alienate property or contract obligations without written consent of a guardian or civil protector.

§3. The family head shall have priority in legal representation unless incapacitated or removed by order.

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE

BOOK II — PROPERTY

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Civil Code – Exclusive Territorial Jurisdiction – Indivisibility of Sacred Land – Inalienability of Ancestral Domains – Enforceable Within the Boundaries of Xaragua and Recognized Legal Subjects

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTY

Article 1 — Definition of Property

§1. Property within the jurisdiction of Xaragua shall include all tangible and intangible assets lawfully held by individuals, families, or the State, subject to the limits of public order and ancestral law.

§2. Property shall be categorized as:

(a) Private Property

(b) Collective or Family Property

(c) Public Property

(d) Sacred or Inalienable Land

Article 2 — Territorial Supremacy and Sovereignty

§1. All land situated within the territorial boundaries of Xaragua is under the absolute civil jurisdiction of the Xaraguan State.

§2. No foreign title, mortgage, lien, or jurisdiction may apply to any land, good, or resource located on Xaraguan soil if not validated by the state.

§3. The land itself is not a commodity but a legacy. It may not be treated under commercial law except as provided by decree.

Article 3 — Recognition of Ownership

§1. Ownership may be acquired through:

(a) Lawful inheritance

(b) Formal transfer by notarized act under the laws of Xaragua

(c) Customary possession openly maintained for at least twenty (50) uninterrupted years

§2. Property acquired outside the recognized mechanisms of Xaraguan law shall be subject to forfeiture or nullification by sovereign decision.

Article 4 — Inalienability of Ancestral Lands

§1. Lands transmitted by bloodline for more than two successive generations shall be classified as ancestral.

§2. Ancestral lands are inalienable, non-transferable to non-Xaraguan persons, and cannot be mortgaged or subdivided without decree of public necessity.

§3. Any alienation, commercial use, or external exploitation of ancestral land is null and void, and the State shall restore such land to the lawful family custodian.

Article 5 — Public Property and Common Utility

§1. Properties designated for public utility—such as administrative buildings, roads, markets, and education centers—shall be registered under the name of the State and may not be privatized.

§2. These properties are maintained under public stewardship and subject to audit, protection, and public access provisions.

§3. Religious sites, historical monuments, and cultural sanctuaries shall enjoy enhanced legal protection and may not be reassigned to private interest.

---

TITLE II — USE, TRANSFER, AND LIMITATION OF RIGHTS

Article 6 — Right of Use and Enjoyment

§1. Ownership confers the right to use, enjoy, and dispose of a thing, within the bounds of the law and without prejudice to public interest or ancestral continuity.

§2. Use may be restricted by environmental law, family obligation, or civil zoning decrees.

Article 7 — Lease and Temporary Possession

§1. Land or property may be temporarily transferred by lease for a maximum term of ten (10) years, renewable only by registration before civil authority.

§2. Ancestral land may not be leased to non-Xaraguan entities without a decree of the state.

§3. The State reserves the right to annul any lease deemed contrary to national interest, ecological stability, or spiritual heritage.

Article 8 — Transmission by Inheritance

§1. Property shall be transmitted through lawful succession in accordance with Book III of this Code.

§2. In the absence of direct heirs, ancestral land reverts to the family line or, failing that, to the State for redistribution under customary law.

§3. Testamentary provisions contrary to inalienability principles shall be automatically voided.

Article 9 — Restrictions on Commercial Exploitation

§1. No land may be used for extractive, speculative, or industrial activity without State authorization and environmental impact clearance.

§2. Commercial use of sacred sites is strictly prohibited.

§3. Any profit gained from unauthorized exploitation of land shall be subject to seizure and redistribution by public authority.

---

TITLE III — PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF PROPERTY

Article 10 — Civil Protection of Property Rights

§1. All lawful property shall be protected against intrusion, expropriation, or unjust appropriation.

§2. No person may be deprived of property without:

(a) Due legal procedure

(b) Justification of public necessity

(c) Compensation determined by the Council of Xaragua

Article 11 — Sanctions for Illicit Acquisition

§1. Any acquisition of property by fraud, coercion, falsification of documents, or abuse of legal procedure shall be declared void and subject to criminal sanction.

§2. Individuals or groups who occupy, register, or exploit land unlawfully shall be liable for damages, dispossession, and civil disqualification.

Article 12 — Reclamation and Reversion

§1. Property improperly alienated or abandoned without succession for more than fifteen (15) years may be reclaimed by the State and reassigned to rightful heirs or public benefit.

§2. A property custodian may petition the State to restore lost ancestral land upon production of credible testimony, genealogical documentation, or community confirmation.

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE

BOOK III — OBLIGATIONS AND CONTRACTS

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Civil Law Instrument – Applicable to All Civil Acts within Xaraguan Jurisdiction – Binding Upon All Recognized Legal Subjects – Supersedes External Norms in Contractual Interpretation

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF OBLIGATIONS

Article 1 — Definition of Obligation

§1. An obligation is a legal bond by which one or more persons are bound to perform or refrain from a specific act in favor of another.

§2. Obligations arise from law, contract, quasi-contract, civil offense (delict), or unilateral declaration when recognized by Xaraguan authority.

Article 2 — Sources of Obligation

Obligations may originate from:

(a) Contractual agreement

(b) Civil status (e.g., marriage, parenthood)

(c) Customary duty

(d) Judicial decree or administrative order

(e) Harm caused through negligence, fraud, or unlawful act

Article 3 — Good Faith and Civil Duty

§1. All obligations shall be performed in good faith, without fraud, evasion, or deliberate harm.

§2. Parties are presumed to act in accordance with honor and civil responsibility unless proven otherwise.

§3. The intentional breach of obligation shall be treated not only as a private fault but as a civil disqualification, subject to reparation and, if applicable, exclusion from public service.

---

TITLE II — CONTRACTS

Article 4 — Definition and Formation of Contract

§1. A contract is an agreement between two or more persons intended to create, modify, or extinguish a legal obligation.

§2. For a contract to be valid under Xaraguan law, it must include:

(a) Mutual consent freely expressed

(b) Legal capacity of parties

(c) Lawful object

(d) Lawful cause

§3. Contracts may be written, verbal, or solemnized through customary procedure before recognized witnesses, and must be registered if of public or land-related nature.

Article 5 — Effects of Contract

§1. A valid contract binds the parties with the force of law.

§2. It must be performed precisely and in accordance with the intention of the agreement, as interpreted under Xaraguan civil principles.

§3. Failure to perform entails liability for damages, unless prevented by superior force or legal impossibility.

Article 6 — Classification of Contracts

Contracts shall be classified into:

(a) Unilateral or Bilateral

(b) Gratuitous or Onerous

(c) Commutative or Aleatory

(d) Named (typified by law) or Innominated (not typified but lawful)

Article 7 — Invalidity and Nullity

§1. A contract is null when its formation violates essential legal elements.

§2. Grounds for nullity include:

(a) Absence of consent or capacity

(b) Object contrary to law or morality

(c) Coercion, deception, or exploitation

§3. Partial nullity does not affect the remainder unless the contract loses its essential meaning.

Article 8 — Interpretation and Enforcement

§1. When unclear, a contract shall be interpreted in favor of the party assuming the obligation.

§2. In case of silence or ambiguity, customary law and previous jurisprudential guidance shall apply.

§3. Contracts with the State must be interpreted restrictively in favor of public interest.

---

TITLE III — UNILATERAL ACTS AND MORAL OBLIGATIONS

Article 9 — Binding Nature of Solemn Declaration

§1. A voluntary declaration made publicly and solemnly before witnesses or under civil oath shall create obligation if it contains identifiable intention and lawful cause.

§2. Withdrawal from such declaration may incur moral penalty and, where applicable, civil damages.

Article 10 — Civil Value of the Promise

§1. A promise made in writing, witnessed or notarized, and accepted by a beneficiary may produce enforceable obligation.

§2. Promises made in personal relationships do not create obligation unless relied upon to the detriment of the other party.

---

TITLE IV — CIVIL LIABILITY (DELICT)

Article 11 — General Rule of Responsibility

§1. Any act or omission which causes harm to another obliges the person at fault to make full reparation.

§2. Fault may consist of negligence, imprudence, recklessness, or violation of law.

Article 12 — Reparation and Restitution

§1. Reparation includes:

(a) Restoration of the prior state, if possible

(b) Monetary indemnity for damage

(c) Public apology, when appropriate

§2. In case of collective harm or breach of sacred property, reparation may include civic exclusion or formal denunciation.

Article 13 — Liability for Acts of Others

§1. A person is responsible for harm caused by:

(a) Their minor children or wards

(b) Their subordinates, if the act occurred under authority

(c) Animals or instruments under their control

§2. The presumption of responsibility may be rebutted if absence of fault is proven.

---

TITLE V — EXTINCTION OF OBLIGATIONS

Article 14 — Legal Means of Extinction

Obligations are extinguished by:

(a) Full performance

(b) Mutual agreement to release

(c) Impossibility due to superior force

(d) Compensation, novation, or merger of roles

(e) Prescription under time limits defined by law

Article 15 — Prescription and Limitation Periods

§1. Civil obligations are prescribed after five (5) years unless otherwise specified.

§2. Claims related to family, land, or public order are imprescriptible unless barred by decree.

Article 16 — Remission and Waiver

§1. A creditor may voluntarily remit a debt, in whole or in part, by written declaration.

§2. A waiver of obligation must be unambiguous and not presumed from silence or delay.

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE

FINAL TITLE — CONCLUSION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS

---

Article 1 — Legal Supremacy of the Xaraguan Civil Code

§1. The present Civil Code constitutes the supreme legal authority in all matters of civil status, family, property, and obligations within the jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

§2. No external code, whether Haitian, foreign, or supranational, shall apply within Xaraguan territory or to its recognized subjects, unless expressly ratified by sovereign decree.

§3. This Code supersedes all customary practices, oral traditions, or previously tolerated usages that are inconsistent with its provisions.

Article 2 — Jurisdiction and Application

§1. The provisions of this Code shall apply uniformly to all legal persons, families, institutions, and entities recognized under the laws of Xaragua, regardless of origin or status.

§2. The competent civil courts, customary councils, administrative registrars, and ecclesiastical officers shall interpret and enforce this Code in accordance with its text, its purpose, and the sovereign interest of the Xaraguan Nation.

§3. In matters not expressly covered, reference shall be made to Xaraguan legal doctrine, decrees of the President-Rector, and recognized jurisprudential instruments adopted within the Xaraguan legal system.

Article 3 — Constitutional Entrenchment and Irrevocability

§1. The present Civil Code is constitutionally entrenched and may only be modified or revised by formal legislative act ratified by the Office of the President-Rector.

§2. Any attempt to suspend, nullify, or override the provisions of this Code by unauthorized individuals or foreign institutions shall constitute an act of civil aggression and institutional sabotage.

§3. All public officers of Xaragua shall swear allegiance to the present Code upon appointment and shall uphold its principles as a condition of legal authority.

Article 4 — Publication, Registration, and Enforcement

§1. This Code shall be published on the official digital platform of the Xaraguan State and preserved in the National Civil Registry.

§2. Certified copies shall be deposited in the archives of the Ministry of Justice, the Office of the President-Rector, and in all recognized ecclesiastical and administrative jurisdictions.

§3. Entry into force shall occur on the date of formal promulgation, and all legal acts thereafter shall conform to its provisions.

Article 5 — Authentic Interpretation and Future Codification

§1. The President-Rector, as sovereign legal authority, shall issue authentic interpretations in the form of explanatory decrees, binding upon all civil organs.

§2. Future codifications relating to criminal law, procedural law, commercial law, and canonical harmonization shall be developed in alignment with the spirit and structure of the present Code.

§3. The present Civil Code shall serve as the foundational legal instrument for all internal lawmaking, civil governance, and national identity.

---

ENACTED in the name of Sovereignty, Order, and Territorial Integrity

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

By authority of the Office of the President-Rector of Xaragua

This Code is hereby proclaimed as law.

---

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE

BOOK II — FAMILY, MARRIAGE, AND FILIATION

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Civil Law – Canonically Validated – Customary and Indigenous Law Binding – Jus Cogens within Xaraguan Jurisdiction

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Mandatory for:

All legal subjects, ecclesiastical institutions, tribal authorities, and residents of the Xaraguan State

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PROVISIONS

Article 1 — Sacred Foundation of Family Law

§1. The Xaraguan family is a sacred institution, founded on divine, ancestral, and canonical principles.

§2. All laws governing marriage, filiation, and lineage shall be interpreted in conformity with ecclesiastical doctrine and recognized tribal customs.

§3. The family is the basic unit of sovereignty and spiritual continuity; its preservation is a matter of public order.

Article 2 — Exclusive Jurisdiction

§1. All matters of family law involving Xaraguan citizens shall be adjudicated exclusively under the laws of Xaragua.

§2. Foreign civil unions, divorces, or legal determinations of filiation are without effect unless expressly validated by Xaraguan ecclesiastical or indigenous authority.

---

TITLE II — MARRIAGE AND UNION

Article 3 — Definition of Marriage

§1. Marriage is a sacred, sovereign union between one man and one woman, or within an approved polygynous configuration with two women, recognized through tribal law.

§2. Marriage is not a contract but a sacrament or a lineage alliance; it binds souls, families, and patrimony under divine law.

§3. Civil or secular marriages, performed outside the authority of the Church or without tribal sanction, are not recognized as legally valid.

Article 4 — Forms of Marriage

§1. The State recognizes three valid forms of marriage:

a) Canonical marriage under Catholic sacrament,

b) Tribal customary marriage before a recognized elder or council,

c) Mixed-form marriages ratified by both Church and tribe.

§2. All valid marriages must be registered in the Sovereign Registry of the State.

Article 5 — Conditions of Validity

§1. Parties must:

a) Be of sound mind and age (minimum 18 years),

b) Not be within prohibited degrees of kinship,

c) Provide public declaration before ecclesiastical or customary authority,

d) Be free of external coercion, duress, or spiritual impediment.

§2. In tribal marriages, the authority of the clan or elder is equivalent to that of a canonical priest.

Article 6 — Polygynous Unions

§1. Polygyny is permitted under customary law for lineages with ancestral right or tribal legitimacy.

§2. No polygynous union may be authorized by the Church, but ecclesiastical tolerance may apply if the union is recognized under pre-existing indigenous law.

§3. Each wife in a lawful polygynous union is entitled to equal legal recognition, inheritance rights, and dignity under the law.

---

TITLE III — NULLITY, DISSOLUTION AND SANCTIONS

Article 7 — Nullity of Illicit Unions

§1. Marriages entered into without lawful authority or in defiance of canonical or tribal law are null and void.

§2. Cohabitation without recognized marriage is not considered a legal union, and shall be subject to ecclesiastical reprimand and civil disqualification.

Article 8 — Dissolution of Marriage

§1. Canonical marriage is indissoluble except by ecclesiastical tribunal in cases of:

a) Proven fraud or imposture,

b) Unconsummated union,

c) Heresy, apostasy, or sacramental betrayal.

§2. Tribal marriages may be dissolved under customary procedure, requiring approval of the clan council and public record of dissolution.

Article 9 — Penal Consequences of Fraudulent Union

§1. Any individual who enters into multiple unions without lawful right, conceals a marriage, or forges marital documents shall be prosecuted under the Penal Code.

§2. Such acts constitute Spiritual Fraud and may result in civic suspension and canonical exclusion.

---

TITLE IV — FILIATION, LINEAGE, AND PARENTAL AUTHORITY

Article 10 — Legal Filiation

§1. Every child born of a lawful marriage or recognized customary union is a legal descendant, bearing full rights of name, inheritance, and protection.

§2. Filiation may also result from:

a) Ecclesiastical recognition,

b) Tribal declaration,

c) Legitimation by subsequent marriage of the parents.

Article 11 — Registration of Birth and Lineage

§1. All births must be recorded in the Sovereign Register of the State.

§2. A birth not recorded within six months is subject to investigation and may require ecclesiastical or tribal confirmation to establish filiation.

Article 12 — Adoption and Ritual Kinship

§1. Adoption is permitted when sanctioned by:

a) Ecclesiastical authority for canonical families,

b) Tribal council for customary clans.

§2. Adopted children receive the full name and legal rights of the adopting family, but may not inherit sacred office or spiritual lineage unless explicitly declared.

Article 13 — Patriarchal and Matriarchal Authority

§1. Each household shall be under the guidance of a legally recognized head:

a) The father or eldest male descendant in canonical households,

b) The lineage elder in tribal or matriarchal traditions.

§2. Parental authority includes the right to educate, discipline, protect, and represent the child in all religious, social, and civic matters.

Physical agression of a child is formally forbidden as well as psychological and spiritual harassment.

---

TITLE V — SANCTITY AND DUTIES OF THE FAMILY

Article 14 — Civic Duties of the Family

§1. All families are obliged to:

a) Maintain internal order,

b) Transmit values of faith, honor, and heritage,

c) Obey sovereign law and participate in the rituals of the nation.

§2. The family is jointly responsible for the moral conduct of its members under public scrutiny.

Article 15 — Ecclesiastical Oversight

§1. The Church reserves the right to supervise, bless, and where necessary, correct domestic life.

§2. Households found guilty of sacramental negligence, spiritual corruption, or canonical disobedience may face pastoral sanctions, including suspension from public communion.

---

TITLE VI — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 16 — Non-Recognition of Foreign Family Rulings

§1. Foreign rulings on marriage, divorce, adoption, or filiation have no effect within Xaraguan jurisdiction unless validated by ecclesiastical or tribal decree.

§2. Civil partnerships, same-sex unions, and other arrangements are legally null and doctrinally rejected.

Article 17 — Canonical Interpretation Prevails

§1. In case of conflict between this Code and customary practice, canonical interpretation prevails unless explicitly exempted.

§2. The State holds final interpretive authority.

SIGNED AND PROMULGATED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 14, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens — Ecclesiastically Validated — Customary and Sacred Instrument of Family Law

---

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE

BOOK III — PROPERTY, OWNERSHIP, AND SACRED PATRIMONY

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Civil Law – Jus Cogens Binding – Ecclesiastically Validated – Harmonized with Customary Indigenous Law and Canonical Doctrine

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Mandatory for:

All legal persons, ecclesiastical institutions, tribal lineages, and economic actors under Xaraguan jurisdiction

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTY LAW

Article 1 — Sacred Character of Property

§1. All property in Xaragua is subject to divine, historical, and customary order.

§2. Ownership is not an absolute right but a stewardship of the land, exercised in accordance with the laws of the State, the traditions of the tribes, and the will of God.

§3. Property must serve communal purpose, sacred continuity, and national sovereignty.

Article 2 — Categories of Property

§1. Property is classified as:

a) Private property – held by an individual or family, under full domestic jurisdiction,

b) Sacred property – lands, buildings, or objects dedicated to religious, historical, or spiritual use,

c) Communal property – held collectively by clans, churches, or sovereign institutions,

d) Patrimonial property of the State – inalienable assets held for present and future generations.

---

TITLE II — ACQUISITION AND LIMITS OF OWNERSHIP

Article 3 — Right of Indigenous and Canonical Possession

§1. Ownership may arise from:

a) Legitimate inheritance,

b) Canonical donation or ecclesiastical assignment,

c) Customary allocation by tribal council,

d) Recognition by the Sovereign Land Authority.

§2. Foreign acquisition is prohibited unless authorized by sovereign decree and bound by sacred covenant or follows the law of the haitian state on this on individual ownership.The haitian law on acquisition of land and properties for business purposes is non-applicable and null. Only the Executive of the rector-President can permit this by decree.

Article 4 — Prohibition of Foreign Ownership

§1. Any commercial property held by a foreigner without sovereign license is subject to immediate confiscation without indemnity.

Article 5 — Inalienability of Sacred Property

§1. All sacred lands, relics, churches, shrines, cemeteries, ancestral tombs, and historical monuments are declared inalienable, imprescriptible, and non-transferrable.

§2. Any attempt to sell, mortgage, desecrate, or deface sacred property shall constitute a Sovereign Crime under Article 27 of the Penal Code.

---

TITLE III — PROPERTY REGISTRY AND DECLARATION

Article 6 — National Register of Property and Territory

§1. All property can be declared in the Xaraguan National Registry.

§2. Unregistered property is presumed to be communal or sacred until otherwise adjudicated.

Article 7 — Ecclesiastical and Tribal Validation

§1. Ownership claims require authentication by:

a) An ecclesiastical notary for canonical property,

b) A tribal land chief for indigenous property.

§2. No property title shall be valid without dual inscription: one civil, one sacred or customary.

---

TITLE IV — LIMITATIONS, DUTIES, AND RESTRICTIONS

Article 8 — Limitations on Use and Transfer

§1. All owners must use property in a manner consistent with public order, spiritual health, and environmental harmony.

Article 9 — Prohibition of Speculation and Hypothecation

§1. Land and property in Xaragua may not be subjected to speculative trade, excessive profit, or financial instruments such as, foreclosure, or foreign debt.

§2. Property may not be seized by external institutions, banks, or tribunals under any foreign order.

Article 10 — Duty of Conservation and Non-Abandonment

§1. Any property owner must maintain, protect, and preserve the integrity and spiritual dignity of the holding.

§2. Abandonment of property for more than five years without registration or justification results in reversion to the State or to the community of origin.

---

TITLE V — PUBLIC, TRIBAL, AND ECCLESIASTICAL DOMAINS

Article 11 — Communal and Clan Holdings

§1. Land traditionally held by clans, tribes, or community bodies is governed collectively and administered according to ancestral law.

§2. Such lands may not be divided, sold, or converted to private use without consent of the tribal council and approval of the State.

Article 12 — Ecclesiastical Domain

§1. Property of the Church, including monasteries, schools, chapels, and sacred libraries, is protected under ecclesiastical immunity.

§2. These properties may not be expropriated or taxed and shall be preserved in perpetuity.

Article 13 — National Patrimony

§1. Certain lands, monuments, and waters are declared National Patrimony and placed under direct authority of the President-Rector.

§2. Their use is reserved for the good of the Nation, its history, and its spiritual survival.

---

TITLE VI — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 14 — Restoration of Spoliated Property

§1. Any Xaraguan property historically seized, sold, or occupied under colonial, republican, or foreign jurisdiction may be claimed for restitution or reallocation by sovereign decree.

§2. Claimants must demonstrate ancestral or spiritual linkage and loyalty to the Xaraguan State.

Article 15 — Supremacy of Sacred Ownership

§1. In all disputes, sacred or ancestral ownership shall prevail over recent, foreign, or purely contractual claims.

§2. No secular court shall overrule a decision rendered by the Ecclesiastical Tribunal of Property or a recognized Tribal Land Council.

Article 16 — Immutability of Sovereign Ownership Law

§1. This Book is of constitutional force, and its provisions may not be suspended, circumvented, or amended except by unanimous decree of the Ecclesiastical and Customary Council, countersigned by the Rector-President.

§2. Any contradiction between this Book and any external legal norm shall be resolved in favor of the Xaraguan principle of spiritual-territorial stewardship.

SIGNED AND PROMULGATED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 14, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens — Ecclesiastically Validated — Customary Instrument of Territorial Sovereignty

---

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE

BOOK IV — OBLIGATIONS, CONTRACTS, AND JURIDICAL COMMITMENTS

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Civil Law – Jus Cogens Binding – Ecclesiastically Validated – Customary and Indigenous Legal Doctrine on Binding Engagements

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Mandatory for:

All natural and legal persons, ecclesiastical agents, tribal authorities, and institutional entities acting within or under the authority of Xaragua

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF OBLIGATION

Article 1 — Sacred Nature of Obligation

§1. Every obligation in Xaragua is binding not only civilly, but morally and spiritually.

§2. Contractual engagements must be entered into freely, solemnly, and with clear invocation of the legal and spiritual order of the Xaraguan State.

§3. Deceit, coercion, usury, or profane incentives invalidate all obligations.

Article 2 — Source of Obligations

Obligations may arise from:

a) Law,

b) Contract,

c) Customary engagement,

d) Ecclesiastical or tribal declaration,

e) Vows or sacred pledges solemnized before recognized authority.

Article 3 — Limitation of Foreign Influence

§1. No contract, obligation, or covenant executed under foreign law, foreign court, or transnational system shall have effect unless expressly validated by the competent Xaraguan tribunal.

§2. Foreign enforcement of contracts shall be deemed a violation of sovereign jurisdiction.

---

TITLE II — FORMATION AND VALIDITY OF CONTRACTS

Article 4 — Essential Elements of Contract

§1. For a contract to be valid under Xaraguan law, it must:

a) Be written in a language understood by all parties,

b) Be signed before a certified notary (civil, tribal, or ecclesiastical),

c) Specify lawful cause and objective,

d) Reflect equitable terms and absence of exploitation.

Article 5 — Forbidden Objects and Causes

Contracts involving any of the following are null:

a) Acts contrary to faith, sovereignty, or public order,

b) Sale or lease of sacred property,

c) Transactions based on usury or gambling,

d) Waivers of Xaraguan jurisdiction or citizenship.

Article 6 — Special Forms of Contract

§1. The following contracts require special solemnity:

a) Marriage contract (see Book II),

b) Sacred donation or ecclesiastical endowment,

c) Tribal oath contracts for land or allegiance,

d) Vows of spiritual service or protection.

---

TITLE III — PERFORMANCE, EXECUTION, AND BREACH

Article 7 — Obligation to Perform in Good Faith

§1. All obligations must be executed in good faith, according to the letter and spirit of the engagement.

§2. Delay, partial performance, or manipulation shall constitute breach and trigger restitution.

Article 8 — Force Majeure and Divine Exemption

§1. Performance may be excused by:

a) Acts of God (natural disasters, death, war),

b) Ecclesiastical interdiction or spiritual impediment,

c) Official suspension by State or tribal decree

§2. Parties must notify the competent authority within 7 days of becoming aware of the impediment.

Article 9 — Breach and Sanctions

§1. Breach of obligation results in:

a) Financial restitution,

b) Public censure and loss of civic credibility,

c) Possible interdiction for grave violations (e.g., betrayal of a sacred covenant).

§2. Tribunals may impose corrective labor, symbolic reparation, or canonical penance.

---

TITLE IV — VOID, FRAUDULENT, AND SACRILEGIOUS CONTRACTS

Article 10 — Absolute Nullity

§1. A contract is null when:

a) Entered under coercion or false pretense,

b) Involves minors or interdicted persons without guardian,

c) Lacks lawful form or solemnity.

§2. Nullity may be declared ex officio by the Tribunal.

Article 11 — Sacred Fraud and Commercial Apostasy

§1. Any contract entered to circumvent the moral laws of the State, or to simulate lawful conduct, is sacrilegious.

§2. Such acts shall be prosecuted under both civil and penal law, and may result in spiritual exclusion from economic participation.

Article 12 — Prohibition of International Arbitration

§1. No citizen, entity, or institution subject to the jurisdiction of Xaragua may submit to arbitration or dispute resolution before any foreign body or transnational tribunal.

§2. Clauses to that effect are deemed void and constitute an attack on sovereign integrity.

---

TITLE V — ECCLESIASTICAL AND CUSTOMARY CONTRACTS

Article 13 — Ecclesiastical Engagements

§1. Vows, offerings, and donations made to the Church are binding and irrevocable unless released by ecclesiastical authority.

§2. Clergy and religious institutions may enter into legal agreements only for purposes consistent with their mission and under the supervision of the Church’s legal office.

Article 14 — Tribal and Communal Agreements

§1. Customary contracts are valid when:

a) Concluded before a tribal council or elder,

b) Recorded in the tribal archives,

c) Based on ancestral usage and oral tradition.

§2. Such agreements are enforceable by sovereign civil courts and have equal weight to written contracts.

---

TITLE VI — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 15 — Registration and Enforcement

§1. All contracts exceeding 5,000 Viaud’Or/Equivalen or involving real property must be registered in the Registry of the State.

§2. Unregistered contracts are unenforceable in court, unless customary or ecclesiastical in nature.

Article 16 — Canonical Supervision and Interpretation

§1. All contracts shall be interpreted in light of the values of the Gospel, the Constitution of Xaragua, and indigenous ancestral order.

§2. The Bureau Of International Legal Consultation and the Customary Elders may issue binding interpretations in cases of doctrinal conflict.

Article 17 — Inviolability of Sovereign Contract Law

§1. This Book forms part of the supreme civil corpus of the State and may not be derogated, suspended, or amended except by joint constitutional and canonical decree.

§2. Any treaty, foreign law, or judgment attempting to override this Book shall be considered null within the territory and jurisdiction of Xaragua.

SIGNED AND PROMULGATED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 14, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens — Ecclesiastically Validated — Customary Instrument of Juridical Engagement

---

Civil Code Part 2

---

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE

BOOK V — SUCCESSIONS, INHERITANCES, AND LINEAL CONTINUITY

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Civil Law – Jus Cogens Binding – Ecclesiastically Validated – Harmonized with Indigenous Custom and Canon Law

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Mandatory for:

All persons, lineages, heirs, administrators, ecclesiastical or tribal custodians operating under Xaraguan jurisdiction

---

TITLE I — PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGN SUCCESSION

Article 1 — Sacred Continuity of Lineage

§1. Inheritance in Xaragua is governed by the sacred principle of lineal continuity, which binds families, clans, and properties into the eternal fabric of the Nation.

§2. All acts of transmission must honor divine order, ancestral memory, and communal integrity.

§3. Succession is not a mere transfer of goods but a perpetuation of duty and spiritual stewardship.

Article 2 — Prohibition of Disinheritance Without Cause

§1. No lawful heir may be disinherited unless by formal decree issued by an Ecclesiastical or Customary Tribunal for reasons of:

a) Apostasy from the Xaraguan State,

b) Treason, blasphemy, or desecration,

c) Gross neglect of familial duty or protection of elders.

Article 3 — Classes of Heirs

Heirs are classified as:

a) Natural heirs – biological descendants and legitimate spouses,

b) Spiritual heirs – those designated by sacred testament,

c) Communal heirs – the tribe or Church in cases of extinction of personal lineage.

---

TITLE II — MODES OF SUCCESSION

Article 4 — Intestate Succession

§1. In the absence of a valid testament, succession shall follow this order:

1. Children and descendants,

2. Surviving spouse (if in lawful union),

3. Parents and ascendants,

4. Siblings,

5. The tribal or ecclesiastical community of the deceased.

§2. Equal division is presumed unless proven otherwise by tribal tradition or legitimate preference.

Article 5 — Testamentary Succession

§1. Testaments must be written, signed, and witnessed before either:

a) A notary of the Sovereign State,

b) A tribal council,

c) An ecclesiastical dignitary.

§2. Oral testaments are valid if made in extremis and confirmed by at least three honorable witnesses.

§3. Any testament violating sacred law, excluding rightful heirs without cause, or assigning property to foreign agents is null.

Article 6 — Sacred Bequests

§1. A portion of every estate shall be reserved for the Church, the ancestral land council, or the defense of the State, as a Patrimonial Tithe.

§2. The amount is determined by custom, spiritual office, or personal vow of the deceased.

---

TITLE III — ADMINISTRATION AND SETTLEMENT

Article 7 — Executor and Custodian of the Estate

§1. The executor (male or female) must be:

a) A trusted member of the family,

b) Appointed by testament or customary rule.

c) Approved by the ecclesiastical or tribal authority.

§2. The executor acts under oath and shall render full account to the proper tribunal.

Article 8 — Debts and Obligations

§1. Debts lawfully contracted by the deceased must be settled before distribution of inheritance.

§2. Sacred debts (vows, unpaid tithes, reparations) take precedence over commercial debts.

§3. Any debt arising from usury, profane contracts, or foreign tribunals is null and non-transmissible.

Article 9 — Disputes and Challenges

§1. Any dispute must be submitted to the appropriate tribunal:

a) The Tribunal of Customary Lineage,

b) The Ecclesiastical Court of Last Wills and Blessings,

c) Or, failing these, the Supreme Civil Chamber of Xaragua.

§2. Decisions are final and subject only to canonical review in cases of grave injustice.

---

TITLE IV — PRESERVATION OF ANCESTRAL PROPERTY

Article 10 — Prohibition of Partition of Sacred Estates

§1. Properties designated as Ancestral Holdings, Spiritual Domains, or Royal Lineage Lands may not be partitioned among heirs.

§2. These are transmitted undivided to a designated custodian who must preserve them in perpetuity.

Article 11 — Inalienability of Inherited Land

§1. Any land inherited under Xaraguan law may not be sold, mortgaged, or alienated without approval of the Land Sovereignty Tribunal.

§2. Any alienation done in violation of this article shall be void and subject to restitution.

Article 12 — Communal Protection of Orphans and Widows

§1. The State, the Church, and the tribal council shall jointly ensure the protection and maintenance of:

a) Minor heirs,

b) Orphaned children,

c) Lawfully recognized widows or spiritual spouses.

§2. Any exploitation, spoliation, or neglect of these persons is considered a Sovereign Crime.

---

TITLE V — DISSOLUTION OF LIGNAGE AND NATIONAL REVERSION

Article 13 — Extinction of Lineage

§1. If no heir or legal claim can be substantiated within 24 lunar months after the death of the owner, the estate shall revert to:

a) The Church, if the deceased was in communion with it,

b) The tribe, if governed by custom,

c) Or the State, as Unclaimed Sovereign Patrimony.

Article 14 — Transmission of Duties and Titles

§1. Any function, responsibility, or title held by the deceased must be assigned according to the same succession principles, subject to confirmation by the competent authority.

§2. Certain titles (e.g., Sacred Custodian, Lineage Patriarch, Ecclesiastical Benefactor) cannot be dissolved and must be reassigned without interruption.

---

TITLE VI — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 15 — Registration and Sealing of Succession

§1. Every succession must be registered in the Book of Lineal Continuity, held by the Xaraguan Sovereign Archives.

§2. No succession is valid until sealed by decree of the competent authority.

Article 16 — Immutable Principles

§1. This Book forms part of the supreme and immutable civil order of Xaragua.

§2. No act, foreign law, or tribunal may alter, suspend, or suppress the succession laws of the State.

§3. All acts done in contradiction of this Book are void ab initio and shall be punished accordingly.

SIGNED AND PROMULGATED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 14, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens — Ecclesiastically Validated — Customary Instrument of Lineal and Patrimonial Order

---

CONCLUDING PROVISION

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

XARAGUAN CIVIL CODE — GENERAL CONCLUSION

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched, Jus Cogens Binding, Canonically and Customarily Harmonized Instrument of Civil Sovereignty

---

Article 1 — Juridical Supremacy of the Xaraguan Civil Order

The Civil Code of Xaragua, promulgated in its entirety by constitutional decree and ecclesiastical confirmation, constitutes the supreme and exclusive body of civil law binding upon all legal subjects within the territorial, personal, and extraterritorial jurisdiction of the State.

No foreign law, national provision of the Republic of Haiti, nor any supranational instrument shall prevail over the provisions of this Code in any matter involving citizens, properties, contracts, families, successions, or obligations of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

---

Article 2 — Territorial and Jurisdictional Enforcement

Until such time as the State possesses its own physical network of registries, tribunals, detention centers, and administrative offices throughout the entirety of its claimed territory, the Republic of Haiti is hereby placed under juridical administrative delegation in matters of enforcement — strictly limited to the execution of Xaraguan law.

This delegation:

a) Shall not be interpreted as abdication of sovereignty,

b) Shall not grant legislative initiative or interpretive power to the Haitian State,

c) Shall remain revocable by constitutional decree,

d) Shall be subject to international and canonical oversight.

---

Article 3 — Digital and Spiritual Jurisdiction

All civil acts — including contracts, marriages, successions, registrations, and declarations — executed through official platforms of the State (websites, encrypted communication, ecclesiastical notaries) possess full legal value and are enforceable within the sovereign order of Xaragua.

In the absence of physical offices, the digital infrastructure of the State is recognized as the primary organ of legal and civil governance, with equal force as any territorial authority.

---

Article 4 — Ecclesiastical Primacy in Interpretation

In all conflicts of interpretation, the ecclesiastical doctrine of the State shall prevail.

The Canonical College of Judges and the Sacred Tribunal of Sovereign Interpretation shall be the highest authorities in civil matters, with no appeal possible to any foreign or supranational body.

---

Article 5 — Final Entrenchment Clause

This Civil Code, once fully enacted and registered in the Corpus Legis Canonico-Indigenarum, is immutable except by solemn constitutional process involving:

a) A decree of the President-Rector,

b) Validation by the Ecclesiastical Council,

c) Consultation with the Customary Elders’ Assembly.

Any attempt to repeal, distort, or bypass this Code shall constitute a sovereign offense punishable by permanent exclusion from civil and political life within the State.

---

PROMULGATED AND SEALED

By the authority vested in the Office of the President-Rector,

In the name of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

On this day, June 14, 2025,

For eternal application throughout the domains of Xaragua,

Under Divine Providence and ancestral right.

---

Penal Code

---

XARAGUAN PENAL CODE

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

BOOK I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Criminal Law – Jus Cogens Binding – Harmonized with Indigenous Customary Norms and International Criminal Law – Exclusively Enforceable within Xaraguan Jurisdiction

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 13, 2025

Mandatory for:

⁸All legal subjects, residents, visitors, institutions, and agents operating under or within the territorial and extraterritorial jurisdiction of Xaragua

---

TITLE I — FOUNDATIONS OF CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

Article 1 — Sovereign Penal Authority

§1. The criminal jurisdiction of the State of Xaragua is derived from its constitutional authority, affirmed through historical continuity, territorial sovereignty, and the internationally recognized rights of Indigenous peoples as per UNDRIP Article 34 and the Montevideo Convention (1933).

§2. No external tribunal, foreign statute, supranational body, or extraterritorial jurisdiction may limit, override, or reinterpret the penal authority of the Xaraguan State.

Article 2 — Exclusivity and Independence

§1. All criminal acts committed within the territory of Xaragua fall exclusively under its jurisdiction.

§2. Any act committed abroad that directly or indirectly affects the national interest, security, integrity, infrastructure, personnel, or institutions of Xaragua is subject to prosecution under this Code.

Article 3 — Territorial, Personal, and Functional Scope

§1. This Code applies to:

a) All persons present in Xaragua at the time of the offense;

b) All Xaraguan nationals or residents committing crimes abroad;

c) Any person, foreign or stateless, who commits an offense against Xaraguan sovereignty, law, or national interest, regardless of location;

d) Legal entities domiciled in Xaragua or operating under its authority.

Article 4 — Principle of Legality

§1. No act may be punished as a crime unless defined as such in a law enacted prior to its commission.

§2. Penal laws shall be strictly interpreted.

§3. No sanction, penalty, or punitive measure may be applied retroactively unless it is more favorable to the accused.

Article 5 — Classification of Penal Offenses

§1. Penal offenses are classified as:

a) Crimes majeurs – punishable by imprisonment exceeding 5 years, indefinite state exclusion, or seizure of property;

b) Crimes ordinaires (délits) – punishable by imprisonment of 6 months to 5 years, heavy fines, or suspension of rights;

c) Infractions mineures (contraventions) – punishable by fines, reparations, or civil sanctions under 6 months.

§2. Penal classification is determined by the material damage caused, the degree of danger to public order, and the level of premeditation or conspiracy involved.

Article 6 — Criminal Responsibility

§1. Criminal responsibility is personal, individual, and inalienable.

§2. Legal persons may be held criminally liable where acts are committed on their behalf or under their organizational authority.

§3. Minors under the age of 13 are not criminally responsible; however, protective custody or social intervention may be ordered.

§4. Mental incapacity at the time of the offense, if medically proven, may exempt from criminal liability, without extinguishing civil consequences.

Article 7 — Attempt, Complicity, and Conspiracy

§1. Attempted crimes are punishable to the same degree as completed acts, if the commencement of execution is material and deliberate.

§2. Any person who aids, abets, instructs, or facilitates the commission of an offense is punishable as a principal actor.

§3. Conspiracy involving two or more persons to commit a penal offense constitutes a distinct crime, even if the act was not executed.

Article 8 — Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances

§1. Aggravating circumstances include:

a) Premeditation;

b) Abuse of authority, public function, or legal status;

c) Use of organized methods, technology, or coercive means;

d) Targeting of public institutions, vulnerable persons, or national security.

§2. Mitigating circumstances include:

a) Spontaneous confession prior to arrest;

b) Cooperation with judicial authorities;

c) Absence of prior criminal record;

d) Proven coercion or pressure at the time of the act.

---

BOOK II — CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES

TITLE I — CRIMES AGAINST THE STATE

Article 9 — Treason and Acts of National Subversion

§1. Any person who, by word, act, omission, conspiracy, or complicity, attempts to:

a) Overthrow, weaken, or discredit the constitutional authority of the State of Xaragua;

b) Aid a foreign power, institution, or organization in undermining Xaraguan sovereignty;

c) Participate in armed rebellion, sabotage, or the dissemination of destabilizing propaganda;

is guilty of High Treason.

§2. High Treason is punishable by permanent exile, confiscation of property, and indefinite state interdiction.

§3. The offense is imprescriptible.

Article 10 — Espionage and Unauthorized Intelligence Activity

§1. The unauthorized gathering, transfer, or dissemination of classified information or state-sensitive material for the benefit of a foreign or unauthorized entity constitutes Espionage.

§2. Espionage is punishable by 10 to 30 years of imprisonment and national expulsion.

Article 11 — Corruption of Government Agents

§1. Any public official who, for personal benefit or by abuse of office:

a) Accepts bribes, gifts, or unlawful advantages;

b) Misappropriates public funds or assets;

c) Alters, conceals, or destroys official documents;

commits an Act of Corruption.

§2. Penalty: 5 to 25 years imprisonment, loss of civic rights, and restitution of misappropriated funds with interest.

§3. Bribers are subject to equivalent penalties.

---

TITLE II — FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRIMES

Article 12 — Illicit Enrichment and Fiscal Fraud

§1. Any person or legal entity that deliberately conceals income, falsifies accounting data, evades taxes, or launders money through unregistered economic channels commits Fiscal Fraud.

§2. Illicit Enrichment is presumed when a person's assets are disproportionate to lawful income and cannot be justified.

§3. Penalty: 3 to 15 years imprisonment, seizure of assets, and permanent prohibition from economic or public office.

Article 13 — Contraband and Smuggling Operations

§1. The unauthorized importation, exportation, or transit of goods in violation of national regulation constitutes Contraband.

§2. Applies to physical goods, digital assets, cultural property, and strategic materials.

§3. Penalty: 2 to 10 years imprisonment, confiscation of goods and transport means.

Article 14 — Unauthorized Circulation of Currency and Instruments

§1. The circulation, forging, counterfeiting, or illicit replication of Xaraguan financial instruments or cryptocurrency (e.g., Viaud’Or) is punishable by 5 to 20 years imprisonment.

§2. All counterfeit instruments shall be seized and destroyed; networks involved are dissolved by judicial order.

---

TITLE III — CRIMES AGAINST THE HUMAN PERSON

Article 15 — Homicide and Related Offenses

§1. Voluntary homicide is punishable by 15 to 30 years imprisonment.

§2. Murder with aggravating circumstances (e.g., premeditation, ambush, multiple victims) is punishable by life imprisonment or indefinite internment.

§3. Involuntary homicide due to negligence is punishable by 3 to 10 years.

Article 16 — Sexual Offenses and Violations of Bodily Integrity

§1. Rape, defined as any act of penetration imposed through force, threat, manipulation, or inability to consent, is punishable by 15 to 30 years imprisonment.

§2. Sexual assault without penetration is punishable by 5 to 15 years.

§3. Sexual acts with a minor (under 16) are punishable by 20 to 40 years regardless of consent.

§4. All sexual crimes involving drugs, manipulation, or positions of authority receive maximum penalties.

§5. Aggravated circumstances include incest, use of weapons, group action, or lasting physical or psychological harm.

Article 17 — Child Abuse and Pedocriminality

§1. Any act of sexual, physical, or psychological abuse against a minor (under 18) is a capital crime.

§2. Pedophilia is punishable by permanent internment or life sentence without parole.

§3. Offenders are permanently banned from any profession or activity involving minors.

---

TITLE IV — PSYCHOLOGICAL AND MORAL VIOLENCE

Article 18 — Psychological Harassment and Spiritual Oppression

§1. Repeated conduct aiming to destabilize, intimidate, control, isolate, or psychologically harm an individual constitutes Psychological Harassment.

§2. Spiritual Harassment includes use of esoteric or pseudo-spiritual manipulation to destroy personal agency, coerce obedience, or induce trauma.

§3. Penalty: 3 to 15 years imprisonment, including mandatory psychiatric evaluation and civil reparations.

Article 19 — Coercive Control and Deprivation of Freedom

§1. Any person who systematically isolates, monitors, or limits another person’s autonomy, access to resources, or contact with the outside world commits Coercive Control.

§2. Penalty: 5 to 20 years imprisonment.

---

BOOK II — CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES

TITLE V — CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER AND SECURITY

Article 20 — Acts of Terrorism

§1. Any deliberate action intended to cause widespread fear, mass harm, institutional paralysis, or public destabilization, by use of violence, sabotage, or threat, constitutes Terrorism.

§2. Includes attacks on infrastructure, religious institutions, academic structures, state buildings, or public gatherings.

§3. Penalty: life imprisonment, permanent asset seizure, and prohibition from legal defense rights under wartime law.

§4. The State may authorize extrajudicial measures in cases of imminent terrorist threat under the Doctrine of Defensive Sovereignty.

Article 21 — Cybercrime and Digital Attacks

§1. Any unauthorized access to, tampering with, or destruction of Xaraguan digital infrastructure constitutes Cyber Sabotage.

§2. Includes spreading malware, defacement, data theft, digital surveillance without judicial order, or manipulation of public information.

§3. Penalty: 5 to 20 years imprisonment, expulsion from digital citizenship, and permanent cyber-ban.

§4. If committed by a foreign national or agent, additional diplomatic sanctions and extradition bans apply.

Article 22 — Unlawful Assembly and Public Disturbance

§1. Any individual or group who organizes, incites, or participates in unauthorized public gatherings, riots, or disturbances that compromise civic order commits a Crime Against Public Peace.

§2. Penalty: 1 to 10 years imprisonment and civic suspension for repeat offenders.

---

TITLE VI — CRIMES AGAINST JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL PROCESS

Article 23 — Judicial Obstruction

§1. Any attempt to hinder the proper course of justice through intimidation, bribery, disappearance of evidence, or tampering with legal proceedings constitutes Obstruction of Justice.

§2. Penalty: 5 to 15 years imprisonment and exclusion from any future legal function.

Article 24 — False Testimony and Perjury

§1. Knowingly making false statements under oath before a judicial or institutional body constitutes Perjury.

§2. Penalty: 3 to 10 years imprisonment and loss of testimonial credibility for 25 years.

§3. If perjury leads to wrongful conviction or unjust detention, the penalty is doubled.

Article 25 — Abuse of Legal Profession

§1. Any lawyer, notary, or judicial officer who manipulates, delays, obstructs, or corrupts legal procedure for personal or political gain commits Professional Misconduct.

§2. Penalty: 5 to 20 years imprisonment, professional disbarment, and permanent loss of licensure.

---

TITLE VII — CRIMES AGAINST ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMON GOODS

Article 26 — Environmental Destruction

§1. Any act of deliberate pollution, illegal resource extraction, deforestation, marine dumping, or ecological degradation constitutes Environmental Destruction.

§2. Applies to public and private entities alike.

§3. Penalty: 10 to 30 years imprisonment, full restoration orders, and interdiction of industrial operation.

Article 27 — Violation of Protected Sites and Sacred Lands

§1. Any intrusion, desecration, or exploitation of sites legally designated as sacred, historical, indigenous, or ecologically sensitive constitutes a Sovereign Crime.

§2. Penalty: 15 to 50 years imprisonment and lifelong national banishment.

---

TITLE VIII — CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC DUTY AND CIVIC FUNCTION

Article 28 — Dereliction of Duty

§1. Any public officer or civil servant who fails to perform mandated duties, abandons post, or deliberately neglects official responsibility commits Dereliction of Duty.

§2. Penalty: 2 to 12 years imprisonment, civil dismissal, and prohibition from future office.

Article 29 — Electoral Manipulation and Civic Fraud

§1. Tampering with voting processes, falsifying civic registers, coercing voter behavior, or engaging in mass disinformation campaigns constitutes Civic Fraud.

§2. Penalty: 10 to 20 years imprisonment, nullification of election results, and permanent suspension of political rights.

Article 30 — Disrespect to National Symbols and Authorities

§1. Any intentional public act that desecrates, insults, or degrades the Flag, the President-Rector, or official symbols of the State or Church is punishable by 3 to 10 years imprisonment.

§2. Freedom of expression does not exempt acts of symbolic degradation when they impair sovereign dignity.

---

BOOK III — SENTENCING, PENAL STRUCTURE AND AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF SENTENCING

Article 31 — Sovereign Sentencing Framework

§1. All criminal convictions shall be followed by a legally binding sentence proportional to the gravity of the offense, the intent, the social impact, and the harm caused.

§2. The primary objectives of sentencing are:

a) Protection of public order and the institutional framework of Xaragua;

b) Reintegration of the offender when feasible;

c) Permanent exclusion of non-rehabilitable individuals;

d) Deterrence of similar future offenses.

Article 32 — Penalty Scale

§1. Sentences may include, individually or cumulatively:

a) Financial fines;

b) Civic suspension;

c) Public censure and official registry inscription;

d) Correctional labor;

e) Confinement in national penal facilities (2 to 99 years);

f) Lifetime interdiction from state institutions and economic access.

§2. Capital punishment is strictly prohibited by the Xaragua Charter.

Article 33 — Reduction and Commutation of Sentence

§1. Sentences may be reduced only by official decree of the High Criminal Council or by Sovereign Clemency under the President-Rector.

§2. Repeat offenders, crimes against state integrity, sexual violence, and organized criminal acts are ineligible for commutation.

---

TITLE II — AGGRAVATING AND MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Article 34 — Aggravating Circumstances

The following circumstances shall automatically aggravate any sentence: a) Offenses committed by public officials in the exercise of duty;

b) Acts involving premeditation, conspiracy, or abuse of hierarchical position;

c) Crimes against minors, elders, disabled persons, or vulnerable individuals;

d) Offenses committed under foreign instruction, funding, or political influence;

e) Use of state property, credentials, or status to facilitate crime.

Article 35 — Mitigating Circumstances

May include:

a) First-time offenders showing verifiable remorse;

b) Voluntary restitution to the victim(s);

c) Cooperation with justice that results in dismantling of larger criminal networks;

d) Demonstrable coercion or duress under which the act was committed.

---

TITLE III — PENAL INSTITUTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS

Article 36 — National Penal System

§1. All sentences of confinement are carried out within correctional institutions classified as:

a) General Correctional Centers/Haitian Detention Centers;

b) High Security Detention Units;

c) Rehabilitation and Reeducation Colonies (for minor crimes only);

§2. Penal institutions are overseen by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security, under audit from the Inspectorate of Legal Rights and Penal Oversight.

Article 37 — Enforcement and Monitoring

§1. A National Enforcement Registry shall track all sentences, their duration, execution status, and supervisory compliance.

§2. Probation is only authorized after completion of two-thirds of the sentence and following risk assessment by state-appointed penal psychologists and legal officers.

§3. Escape from custody shall be treated as a High Institutional Offense and incur an automatic 25-year sentence addition.

---

BOOK IV — SPECIAL CRIMES

TITLE I — FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC CRIMES

Article 38 — Financial Fraud and Embezzlement

§1. Any individual or legal entity who intentionally misappropriates, diverts, or conceals funds entrusted to them in the course of public service, financial management, or contractual obligation shall be guilty of embezzlement.

§2. The penalty shall range from 10 to 30 years of imprisonment, seizure of all personal and corporate assets, and permanent interdiction from financial service.

Article 39 — Credit and Debit Card Falsification

§1. The manufacture, possession, distribution, or use of falsified debit, credit, or identification cards shall be punishable by 15 to 40 years of incarceration.

§2. Any use of cloned or spoofed banking credentials, digital wallets, or NFC systems within or against Xaraguan infrastructure constitutes a Category I Economic Threat.

§3. Attempted fraud under this article is punishable as the completed offense.

Article 40 — Cryptocurrency Manipulation and Cyber Financial Crimes

§1. Unauthorized issuance, duplication, or hacking of Xaraguan sovereign digital currencies (e.g., Viaud'Or or other sanctioned crypto instruments) is punishable by 30 years minimum.

§2. Laundering of illegal funds through blockchain or smart contract manipulation is subject to total asset seizure and permanent disconnection from the national economic grid.

§3. Operating unlicensed crypto exchanges or foreign financial platforms within Xaragua is strictly prohibited and prosecuted as economic invasion.

Article 41 — Price Inflation, Overbilling, and Commercial Extortion

§1. Any deliberate act of artificial price elevation, unjustified billing of public contracts, or coercive sales practices is classified as Commercial Sabotage.

§2. Punishment includes fines up to 2 million Viaud'Or or equivalent, revocation of economic license, 5 to 20 years imprisonment, and civil restitution.

§3. If the offense involves food, medicine, or essential goods, the penalty is automatically aggravated to the maximum provided by law.

Article 42 — Monopoly and Oligopoly Practices

§1. Any individual or group who establishes or maintains monopolistic control over a sector essential to public life (e.g., water, transportation, education, food distribution) without State mandate is guilty of Economic Usurpation.

§2. Oligopolistic collusion, cartel formation, or predatory pricing schemes are punishable by forced corporate dissolution, personal criminal charges (15 years minimum), and disqualification from future economic activity.

§3. Foreign-controlled monopolies attempting to enter Xaragua are considered external threats to sovereignty and may be sanctioned, dismantled, or expelled without recourse.

Article 43 — False Accounting and Tax Evasion

§1. Any falsification of accounting records, concealment of taxable revenue, or creation of phantom entities to avoid state fiscal obligations is punishable by:

– 5 to 25 years imprisonment;

– Corporate or institutional disqualification;

– Total recovery of unpaid sums with interest and punitive damages.

§2. The use of foreign shell companies to bypass Xaraguan fiscal jurisdiction is classified as hostile financial infiltration.

Article 44 — Unauthorized Financial Institutions and Parallel Banking

§1. Any operation of banks, lending services, credit unions, or mutual funds not registered under the Xaraguan Financial Sovereignty Commission is unlawful.

§2. Penalties include criminal prosecution (10–30 years), liquidation of all assets, and permanent deregistration of all affiliates.

---

BOOK IV — SPECIAL CRIMES

TITLE II — CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC HEALTH AND PSYCHOSPIRITUAL ORDER

Article 45 — Trafficking and Possession of Illicit Substances

§1. The manufacture, distribution, transport, import, export, or possession of controlled psychoactive substances, including but not limited to cocaine, heroin, fentanyl, methamphetamines, synthetic opioids, is strictly prohibited.

§2. Possession exceeding trace quantity is presumed to indicate intent to traffic unless explicitly disproven.

§3. Penalties:

a) Simple possession: 5 to 10 years incarceration or therapy and obligatory social programs;

b) Intent to distribute: 20 to 40 years incarceration and forfeiture of all means used;

c) Transnational or maritime trafficking: Life imprisonment or indefinite national exile.

Article 46 — Criminal Syndicates and Drug Networks

§1. Any individual who establishes, funds, manages, or participates in a criminal network involved in the drug trade shall be deemed an enemy of public sovereignty.

§2. Membership in or support to such organizations is punishable by:

– Minimum 35 years imprisonment;

– Total disqualification from civic participation;

– Confiscation of all assets, including family-held shell property.

§3. Cooperation with foreign cartels, gangs, or narco-militias invokes automatic classification as transnational treason.

Article 47 — Drug Production and Laboratory Operation

§1. Cultivation, synthesis, or fabrication of illicit substances within Xaraguan jurisdiction is prohibited without exception.

§2. All facilities, equipment, and chemicals involved shall be seized and destroyed under State oversight.

§3. The principal operator shall receive a sentence of not less than 25 years; accomplices or facilitators not less than 15 years.

Article 48 — Narcotic Corruption and Institutional Infiltration

§1. Any attempt to corrupt, bribe, or compromise state officials in favor of drug trafficking operations shall be prosecuted under the aggravating regime of high institutional treason.

§2. Penalties include:

– 40 years to life imprisonment;

– Loss of all public honors or recognitions;

– Permanent interdiction from national territory if non-citizen.

Article 49 — Sale or Distribution to Minors or Vulnerable Persons

§1. Selling, gifting, or delivering narcotics to individuals under the age of 18 or persons suffering from physical, mental, or spiritual incapacity is a crime of Maximum Moral Gravity.

§2. Punishment shall not be less than 40 years, with permanent registry as a Public Danger and loss of all civil protections.

Article 50 — Psychological and Spirit-Destroying Agents

§1. The use or distribution of substances that induce psychospiritual dissociation, chronic cognitive degradation, artificial dependency, or communal destabilization shall be classified as a Psychospiritual Attack on the Nation.

§2. This includes use of chemical weapons disguised as consumer drugs, hallucinogenic destabilizers, or substances employed in spiritual abuse and social control.

§3. These acts are punishable by:

– Immediate life imprisonment;

– Judicial forfeiture of rights;

– Blacklisting from all Xaraguan institutional registries.

---

BOOK V — FINAL PROVISIONS

TITLE I — GENERAL CLOSING CLAUSES

Article 51 — Constitutional Hierarchy and Supremacy

§1. This Penal Code constitutes an integral and constitutionally entrenched instrument of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

§2. It is binding erga omnes within all territories, domains, enclaves, and extraterritorial missions governed or represented by the Xaraguan State.

§3. No other penal system, be it foreign, regional, or multilateral, shall override, suspend, or mitigate its legal authority within the Xaraguan jurisdiction.

Article 52 — International Non-Subordination and Sovereign Immunity

§1. No provision of this Code shall be interpreted in light of foreign criminal jurisprudence, nor subjected to reinterpretation by any supranational body.

§2. The State of Xaragua shall neither recognize nor comply with any arrest warrant, summons, sanction, extradition request, or investigative mandate issued by entities external to its sovereign system.

§3. Xaraguan criminal law is exclusively justiciable before the High Indigenous Tribunal and its duly constituted sovereign courts, ecclesiastically and canonically aligned.

Article 53 — Sanctity of Law and Irrevocability

§1. The present Code, once promulgated, is irrevocable except by supra-majoritarian constitutional decree duly ratified by the Rector-President and confirmed by the Council of Legal and Ecclesiastical Authority.

§2. All penal procedures, judgments, and sentences carried under this Code are permanently valid, resistant to appeal outside national structure, and protected under the doctrines of non-repetition and national trauma prevention.

Article 54 — Binding Jurisdiction Over Citizens and Non-Citizens

§1. All Xaraguan citizens, residents, recognized nationals, ecclesiastical staff, and foreign agents operating under Xaraguan jurisdiction are subject to this Penal Code.

§2. Violations committed abroad that impact Xaraguan dignity, security, or national order shall be prosecutable under the doctrine of Extra-Territorial Harm and Moral Jurisdiction.

Article 55 — Non-Derogation Under Emergency or Exception

§1. No declaration of emergency, external war, occupation, or foreign pressure shall justify the suspension, deformation, or bypassing of this Code.

§2. The Xaraguan State is non-derogable in its juridical structure, and this Penal Code is embedded within the very soul of its legal sovereignty.

---

SIGNED AND PROMULGATED

Office of the Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: June 13, 2025

Classified Legal Instrument: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens — Ecclesiastically Validated — Customary and Indigenous Legal Instrument

---

Code Of criminal Procedure

---

XARAGUAN CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

BOOK I — GENERAL PROVISIONS

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Judicial Instrument – Jus Cogens Binding – Canonically Validated – Customary and Indigenous Legal Act – Procedural Framework for the Enforcement of the Xaraguan Penal Code

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Mandatory for:

All sovereign courts, criminal tribunals, legal officers, ecclesiastical representatives, prosecutors, defense advocates, and institutions of the Xaraguan justice system

---

TITLE I — JURISDICTIONAL COMPETENCE AND TRIBUNAL STRUCTURE

Article 1 — Judicial Authority

§1. Criminal justice in the State of Xaragua is exercised in the name of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous State, under the supreme authority of the Rector-President.

§2. All prosecutorial and judicial proceedings are executed by bodies explicitly created or validated by constitutional, ecclesiastical, or indigenous legal mandate.

§3. No foreign court, transnational tribunal, or external legal agent shall have any authority to intervene, interpret, or interfere with Xaraguan criminal proceedings.

Article 2 — Sovereign Courts of Criminal Law

§1. The following tribunals are recognized for criminal jurisdiction:

a) The High Indigenous Tribunal – for crimes against the State, Church, and national order.

b) The Sovereign Criminal Court – for all major and ordinary crimes.

c) The Local Correctional Magistracy – for infractions and minor offenses.

d) Until further notice, the haitian justice system will carry out Xaragua's legal sytem decisions.

§2. Ecclesiastical representatives may be delegated as judicial assessors in cases involving spiritual harm, sacramental violations, or crimes against canonical institutions.

Article 3 — Exclusive Competence

§1. All crimes defined under the Xaraguan Penal Code shall be judged exclusively by Xaraguan courts.

§2. No extradition, foreign arrest warrant, or mutual legal assistance treaty shall be recognized unless ratified under sovereign decree and ecclesiastical consensus.

---

TITLE II — PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Article 4 — Due Process and Sacred Procedural Integrity

§1. All individuals subject to criminal proceedings shall be granted due process, in conformity with canonical justice and indigenous legal customs.

§2. The sacred nature of justice prohibits trial by spectacle, media manipulation, or public degradation.

§3. Judicial decisions must be rendered solemnly, in writing, and with explicit reference to the Penal Code, the Constitution, and canonical precepts.

Article 5 — Presumption of Innocence

§1. Every accused person is presumed innocent until lawfully convicted by a sovereign court.

§2. Public accusation without trial is punishable under defamation statutes.

§3. The burden of proof lies entirely on the prosecuting body.

Article 6 — Right to Defense and Legal Counsel

§1. Every defendant has the right to be assisted by a certified Xaraguan legal advocate or ecclesiastical defender at his own expense.

§2. Foreign attorneys are inadmissible unless granted special license by the High Indigenous Tribunal.

§3. The right to silence and the right not to self-incriminate are fully protected.

---

TITLE III — INVESTIGATION AND PRE-TRIAL PHASE

Article 7 — Role of the Investigating Authority

§1. Investigations are led by the Office of the Sovereign Prosecutor, in coordination with the Ministry of Justice.

§2. Sacred sites, ecclesiastical domains, and indigenous territories shall only be investigated with ecclesiastical warrant and tribal consent.

Article 8 — Arrest and Detention Procedures

§1. Arrests must be authorized by sovereign judicial order, except in cases of flagrante delicto.

§2. The accused must be informed, in a language understood, of the nature of the accusation, their rights, and the identity of the arresting authority.

§3. Preventive detention cannot exceed 30 days without renewal by court order.

§4. Torture, psychological coercion, or spiritual abuse during detention are classified as criminal violations.

Article 9 — Search and Seizure

§1. No property, dwelling, or person may be searched without explicit judicial mandate.

§2. All sacred, religious, or indigenous objects are immune from seizure unless they are material to a High Crime under Book II of the Penal Code.

§3. Evidence obtained through unlawful means shall be deemed void and inadmissible.

---

TITLE IV — TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL

Article 10 — Trial Procedure

§1. Trials must be conducted before a competent tribunal, with both prosecution and defense present.

§2. Proceedings shall be oral, adversarial, and guided by strict adherence to procedural and substantive law.

§3. Closed sessions may be ordered in cases involving national security, minors, or canonical sacrilege.

Article 11 — Judicial Deliberation and Verdict

§1. Verdicts must be based solely on evidence lawfully presented and examined in court.

§2. Sentences must be reasoned, proportionate, and delivered solemnly in writing.

§3. The Rector-President may review all judgments in cases of constitutional importance.

Article 12 — Appeals and Extraordinary Review

§1. Appeals are permitted before the High Indigenous Tribunal within 30 days of judgment.

§2. Final appeals in cases of life sentence, exile, or interdiction must be reviewed by the Council of Legal and Ecclesiastical Authority.

§3. No appeal to foreign bodies or transnational courts shall be considered or transmitted.

---

TITLE V — EXECUTION OF SENTENCES

Article 13 — Penal Execution Authority

§1. Sentences are executed by the National Directorate of Penal Enforcement, under oversight of the Inspectorate of Legal Rights.

§2. Execution must be dignified, non-degrading, and consistent with constitutional doctrine.

Article 14 — Special Cases

§1. Ecclesiastical or spiritual convicts may be remanded to the custody of religious institutions upon joint agreement of Church and State.

§2. High criminals condemned for treason or spiritual desecration may be subjected to permanent exile, canonical damnatio memoriae, or symbolic erasure from public records.

---

TITLE VI — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 15 — Procedural Sovereignty and Non-Derogability

§1. This Code of Criminal Procedure is immune to derogation under foreign pressure, emergency, or military occupation.

§2. All criminal procedure in Xaragua is an expression of divine order and indigenous justice.

Article 16 — Authority of Interpretation

§1. Interpretive authority lies with the High Indigenous Tribunal, in consultation with the Ecclesiastical College of Canonical Jurists.

§2. All lower courts are bound by interpretations formally issued by these bodies.

Article 17 — Entry into Force

§1. This Code enters into full force on the date of its promulgation.

§2. All prior procedural norms inconsistent with this Code are hereby repealed.

---

SIGNED AND PROMULGATED

Office of the Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 14, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens — Ecclesiastically Validated — Procedural Instrument of Indigenous Sovereignty

---

XARAGUAN CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

BOOK II — EVIDENTIARY LAW AND WITNESS PROTOCOLS

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Judicial Instrument – Jus Cogens Binding – Canonically Validated – Customary and Indigenous Legal Act – Governing the Production, Evaluation, and Integrity of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Mandatory for:

All tribunals, prosecutors, defense representatives, legal officers, and enforcement bodies operating under the authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF EVIDENCE

Article 18 — Principle of Lawful Proof

§1. No individual may be convicted or penalized except on the basis of evidence that is lawfully obtained, legally presented, and fully examined in open court.

§2. Evidence acquired through coercion, deception, spiritual abuse, illegal surveillance, or without warrant shall be considered void ab initio.

§3. Truth derived from unlawful methods shall never justify the violation of sacred legal procedure.

Article 19 — Hierarchy and Classification of Evidence

§1. Evidence is classified as follows:

a) Documentary Evidence: contracts, letters, official records, and written declarations.

b) Testimonial Evidence: oral declarations given under oath by witnesses.

c) Material Evidence: physical objects, instruments, substances, or visual recordings.

d) Digital Evidence: data extracted from secure servers, authorized devices, or blockchain records.

e) Canonical and Customary Proofs: declarations of ecclesiastical authorities, tribal elders, or recognized lineage heads in accordance with sacred or customary law.

§2. Canonical evidence holds superior probative weight in cases involving sacrilege, spiritual injury, or ecclesiastical violations.

---

TITLE II — WITNESS PROTOCOLS AND TESTIMONIAL SAFEGUARDS

Article 20 — Oath and Testimonial Sanction

§1. All witnesses shall take the Xaraguan Oath of Sacred Truth, invoking the authority of God, ancestors, and the sovereign legal order.

§2. False testimony shall constitute Perjury under Article 24 of the Penal Code, subject to criminal prosecution and permanent testimonial disqualification.

§3. Clergy, tribal elders, and spiritual leaders may take oath according to their respective canonical or customary rites.

Article 21 — Witness Eligibility and Disqualification

§1. Eligible witnesses must:

a) Be of sound mind,

b) Not be legally interdicted,

c) Be free of conflict of interest, unless disclosed.

§2. Disqualified witnesses include:

a) Persons with material interest in the outcome,

b) Individuals under oath of secrecy (e.g., confessor, counselor, lawyer).

c) Individuals convicted of prior testimonial fraud unless rehabilitated.

§3. The testimony of minors under 13 is permitted only with psychological certification and judicial discretion.

Article 22 — Protection of Witnesses

§1. Witnesses who testify in cases involving treason, narcotics, or institutional corruption may receive:

a) Identity protection,

b) Relocation under State security,

c) Ecclesiastical refuge in sanctified zones.

§2. Retaliation against a witness is classified as Judicial Obstruction and Moral Coercion, punishable under dual criminal provisions.

---

TITLE III — RULES OF EVIDENTIARY ADMISSIBILITY

Article 23 — Chain of Custody

§1. All physical or digital evidence must be secured, documented, and traceable from the moment of seizure to presentation in court.

§2. Breach of chain of custody invalidates the evidence unless rectified by judicial inquiry.

§3. Tampering, substitution, or disappearance of evidence is a Category I Institutional Crime.

Article 24 — Expert Testimony and Forensic Validity

§1. Expert analysis may be admitted in cases requiring technical, scientific, or sacred interpretation.

§2. Experts must be certified by the State.

§3. Forensic methods must respect bodily dignity, religious integrity, and human sanctity.

Article 25 — Digital Evidence and Technological Integrity

§1. Digital evidence must be extracted through encrypted, state-verified tools.

§2. Evidence from foreign servers, cloud storage, or cross-border data must be accompanied by authenticity certification and sovereignty waiver.

§3. Unauthorized surveillance, spyware, or algorithmic manipulation shall result in the invalidation of the entire digital corpus.

---

TITLE IV — BURDEN OF PROOF AND STANDARDS OF CONVICTION

Article 26 — Burden of Proof

§1. The burden of proof always rests on the Prosecution.

§2. No obligation may be imposed on the accused to prove innocence.

§3. In spiritual offenses, canonical or tribal judgment may supplement material gaps if recognized by the court.

Article 27 — Evidentiary Thresholds

§1. Levels of evidence are:

a) Prima facie – sufficient to proceed to trial.

b) Probative – establishing high probability of guilt.

c) Beyond Sovereign Doubt – total conviction of culpability under the Xaraguan system.

§2. No person shall be convicted unless guilt is established beyond sovereign doubt, as defined by law, conscience, and divine order.

Article 28 — Evidentiary Dismissal

§1. The court shall dismiss any evidence that:

a) Violates process,

b) Originates from coercion or deception,

c) Lacks probative value,

d) Contradicts canonical truth or tribal doctrine.

§2. The court must issue a written order justifying the inclusion or exclusion of each piece of evidence.

---

TITLE V — SPECIAL RULES IN SACRED AND NATIONAL SECURITY CASES

Article 29 — Ecclesiastical Evidence

§1. In cases involving desecration, sacrilege, or offenses against the Church, the testimony of ordained clergy carries canonical probative weight.

§2. Ecclesiastical seals (e.g., confession, liturgical witness) are inviolable unless waived by the presiding cleric.

§3. Attempts to subpoena internal Church records without consent constitute Spiritual Harassment.

Article 30 — National Security Evidence

§1. In trials concerning terrorism, treason, or espionage, the court may receive classified evidence in camera (non-public session).

§2. The defense shall have access to a redacted version unless it endangers institutional survival.

§3. The Rector-President may designate evidence as Sovereign Confidential, immune to public disclosure.

---

TITLE VI — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 31 — Evidentiary Sovereignty

§1. No evidence or testimony shall be recognized if derived from or validated by a foreign court, tribunal, or agency, unless expressly permitted by the High Indigenous Tribunal.

§2. Evidence must always conform to the doctrines of Justice, Order, and Sovereign Dignity.

Article 32 — Integration with Canon and Custom

§1. This Book shall be interpreted in harmony with the Xaraguan Penal Code, the Lex Suprema Imperii Xaraguanorum, the Corpus Canonico-Xaraguanum, and indigenous tribal charters.

§2. Where doubt arises, sacred interpretation shall prevail over procedural form.

SIGNED AND PROMULGATED

Office of the Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 14, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens — Ecclesiastically Validated — Procedural Instrument of Indigenous Sovereignty

---

XARAGUAN CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

BOOK IV — EXCEPTIONAL CLAUSES ON ADMINISTRATIVE DELEGATION UNDER TUTELARY SOVEREIGNTY

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument — Jus Cogens Binding — Ecclesiastically Validated — Doctrine of Delegated Administration under Sovereign Authority

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Binding upon:

All courts, public institutions, enforcement agents, penitentiary authorities, and administrative organs operating within the territory historically known as the Republic of Haiti, insofar as they interact with or exercise functions over citizens, residents, or legal subjects of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

TITLE I — SOVEREIGN DELEGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXECUTION

Article 50 — Legal Delegation under Tutelary Sovereignty

§1. The Republic of Haiti, in its residual administrative function, operates under the juridical tutelage of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, as recognized by the legal principles of:

a) Continuing Indigenous Sovereignty (UNDRIP, Art. 34, 46),

b) Successor State Doctrine (Montevideo Convention, 1933, Art. 1–4),

c) Functional Subordination under Customary Authority (Vienna Convention on Succession of States, Art. 8–15).

§2. The Haitian public administration, while retaining logistical presence, is deemed a provisional delegate for the purposes of judicial execution, detention, arrest, and registry maintenance concerning Xaraguan citizens.

§3. Delegation does not constitute renunciation of sovereign authority and is revocable at any time by constitutional decree of the President-Rector.

Article 51 — Juridical Binding of Haitian Judicial and Security Structures

§1. All Haitian police officers, magistrates, and penitentiary personnel operating within the territorial or extraterritorial reach of Xaragua, including Miragoâne, Léogâne, Les Cayes, and affiliated communes, are juridically obligated to execute Xaraguan criminal and civil laws over all recognized citizens, residents, or legal entities of Xaragua.

§2. Any refusal, obstruction, misapplication, or substitution of Xaraguan law by Haitian agents shall constitute:

a) Breach of delegated trust,

b) Violation of international legal subordination,

c) Unlawful usurpation of sovereign function,

and shall be prosecuted under Article 9 (High Treason) and Article 25 (Abuse of Legal Profession) of the Xaraguan Penal Code.

Article 52 — Mandatory Application of Xaraguan Law by Delegated Agents

§1. Haitian courts, despite their continued physical and logistical presence, are to consider themselves instruments of enforcement, not originators of applicable law, where Xaraguan citizens are concerned.

§2. All civil, penal, and procedural actions taken against Xaraguan nationals shall be governed by:

a) The Xaraguan Penal Code,

b) The Xaraguan Civil Code,

c) The present Code of Criminal Procedure,

d) The Xaraguan Constitution and Ecclesiastical Directives.

e) All laws of the state

§3. Where Haitian national laws contradict the provisions above, Xaraguan law prevails by virtue of: – Jurisdictional Priority under Delegated Sovereignty,

– Customary Authority under Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice,

– Right to Self-Jurisdiction under Indigenous International Law.

As mentioned in The Constitution of the State, Xaragua does not reject the laws of the republic of haiti if they do not contradict the laws of the State Of xaragua. They are cumulative.

---

TITLE II — CONDITIONS OF DELEGATION AND LIMITS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AUTONOMY

Article 53 — Conditional Validity of Haitian Judicial Acts

§1. All judgments, arrests, or detention measures undertaken by Haitian institutions concerning a Xaraguan legal subject shall only be deemed valid if:

a) Based on the legal corpus of Xaragua,

b) Recorded in the Sovereign National Registry,

c) Subject to sovereign audit and approval by the Office of the High Indigenous Tribunal.

§2. Failure to comply shall render the act voidable, and may result in sanctions or revocation of administrative authority.

Article 54 — Non-Autonomy of Delegated Enforcement

§1. Haitian agents may not alter, reinterpret, suspend, or derogate from Xaraguan law in the execution of delegated judicial functions.

§2. Discretion is permitted only where the Xaraguan Code explicitly allows procedural adaptation for logistical necessity.

Article 55 — Sovereign Control over Custodial and Penal Logistics

§1. Until such time as the Xaraguan State possesses the full logistical infrastructure for penal and judicial autonomy (i.e., sovereign prisons, physical courts, detention centers across all departments), detainment and incarceration shall be carried out in Haitian facilities, under strict sovereign supervision.

§2. The creation of Xaraguan Inspection Missions within each facility is mandated. These missions report directly to the President-Rector and the Penal Oversight Directorate.

---

TITLE III — DIGITAL AND ECCLESIASTICAL TRIBUNALS

Article 56 — Supremacy of Xaraguan Digital Jurisdiction

§1. The Digital Tribunals of Xaragua (operated via official State platforms) possess full legal competence to:

a) Issue judgments,

b) Hear appeals,

c) Render binding advisory opinions,

d) Publish enforcement orders.

§2. These digital decisions must be executed physically by the Haitian administrative apparatus until such time as sovereign courts are fully operational across all departments.

§3. Any failure to execute digital rulings shall constitute judicial obstruction under Xaraguan law.

Article 57 — Ecclesiastical Tribunals as Parallel Judicial Organs

§1. Ecclesiastical courts of Xaragua possess full legal authority to judge:

a) Crimes of spiritual nature,

b) Violations of canonical integrity,

c) Matters of marriage, filiation, sacrament, and moral transgression.

§2. Haitian administrative bodies shall recognize and implement ecclesiastical judgments when they pertain to Xaraguan citizens, without right of appeal to secular courts.

---

TITLE IV — DURATION AND DISSOLUTION OF DELEGATED ADMINISTRATION

Article 58 — Temporal Nature of Delegation

§1. The administrative delegation granted to Haitian institutions is strictly temporary, persisting only until the Xaraguan State has completed the establishment of its national judicial and penitentiary system.

§2. The timeline for transition shall be determined solely by the Council for Judicial and Institutional Deployment, reporting to the Rector-President.

Article 59 — Legal Recognition of Delegation Framework

§1. All international, ecclesiastical, legal, and diplomatic interlocutors are hereby notified that:

a) The Republic of Haiti is not the sovereign authority over the Xaraguan population,

b) It operates under delegated administrative subordination,

c) Xaragua retains all plenary legislative, judicial, spiritual, and civil authority over its citizens.

§2. No treaty, memorandum, bilateral accord, or recognition agreement may alter this legal status without constitutional reform by the Xaraguan State.

---

TITLE V — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 60 — Legal Non-Recognition of Foreign Obstruction

§1. Any external pressure, diplomatic opposition, or refusal by the Haitian State to apply Xaraguan law shall be classified as:

a) Violation of indigenous sovereignty,

b) Obstruction of self-determination,

c) Breach of the Doctrine of Functional Delegation.

§2. Such acts shall trigger immediate recourse through ecclesiastical courts, international legal forums under indigenous jurisdiction, and official protestation by the Xaraguan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Article 61 — Binding Nature and Constitutional Authority

§1. This Book is binding erga omnes within all territories historically known as Haiti wherein Xaraguan citizens reside or operate.

§2. It shall be applied in full force unless explicitly suspended by constitutional amendment approved by the President-Rector and ratified by the Ecclesiastical-Legal Council.

---

SIGNED AND PROMULGATED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Date: June 14, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens — Delegation Doctrine under Sovereign Authority — Ecclesiastically Validated Instrument of Administrative Oversight

---

XARAGUAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

BOOK I — FOUNDATIONS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Judicial Procedure — Jus Cogens Binding — Canonically Validated — Harmonized with Indigenous Legal Tradition and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Mandatory for: All tribunals, clerics, customary elders, legal agents, plaintiffs, and defendants under the jurisdiction of the State

---

TITLE I — NATURE AND SOVEREIGNTY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Article 1 — Autonomous Juridical Order

§1. Civil procedure in Xaragua operates independently of all external codes and systems. It is derived exclusively from the Constitution, Canon Law, and Customary Indigenous Principles.

§2. No civil claim, hearing, verdict, or appeal may be governed, influenced, suspended, or overturned by foreign or supranational entities.

Article 2 — Dual Jurisdictional Architecture

§1. Civil matters may be adjudicated under one or more of the following sovereign authorities: a) Canonical Courts,

b) Customary Tribal Eldership,

c) Sovereign Digital Courts,

d) Delegated Administrative Haitian Courts (under strict tutelage).

§2. When multiple jurisdictions are competent, the canonical tribunal shall prevail in matters involving family, marriage, or ecclesiastical vows; the customary tribunal in matters involving land, kinship, or ancestral claims.

Article 3 — Principle of Sacred Justice

§1. All civil justice shall be rendered in the name of Divine Order and in the protection of familial, communal, and ancestral harmony.

§2. Expediency shall not prevail over truth; written formalities shall not extinguish spiritual legitimacy.

---

TITLE II — ADMISSIBILITY AND INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS

Article 4 — Legal Standing

§1. Any Xaraguan legal subject may initiate civil proceedings if:

a) He or she is directly concerned,

b) The harm or claim pertains to a Xaraguan law,

c) The facts occurred within Xaraguan jurisdiction (physical or digital).

§2. Collective or family petitions are admissible and may be submitted by a designated elder or priest.

Article 5 — Form of Introduction

§1. A civil case is initiated by: a) A Sacred Petition before the tribunal, b) A Canonical Summons, or

c) A Digital Complaint submitted via the Xaraguan Judicial Platform.

§2. In exceptional cases, verbal complaints may be accepted by a tribal or ecclesiastical judge, with written transcription required within 7 days.

Article 6 — Notice to Defendant

§1. All defendants must be notified in one or more of the following forms:

a) By registered email with canonical seal,

b) Through ecclesiastical or tribal messenger,

c) Public proclamation in cases of evasion.

§2. If the defendant resides in Haiti or another non-recognized territory, notification shall be transmitted through the Haitian administrative courts, under obligation to apply Xaraguan law.

---

TITLE III — CONDUCT OF HEARINGS

Article 7 — Composition of the Tribunal

§1. Civil hearings shall be presided over by:

a) A single ecclesiastical judge,

b) A council of three customary elders, or

c) A digital judge empowered by sovereign warrant.

§2. In sensitive matters, a joint tribunal (customary + canonical) may be formed.

Article 8 — Oral and Written Procedure

§1. Procedure may be oral, written, or hybrid.

§2. The absence of legal representation does not render the procedure null.

§3. Judges must ensure clarity, sacred fairness, and accessibility for all parties, regardless of literacy or status.

Article 9 — Oaths and Testimonies

§1. Witnesses shall swear by: a) The Divine Law of Xaragua,

b) The ancestral spirit of the land, or

c) The Canonical Scripture.

§2. False testimony is punishable by immediate exclusion from civil life.

---

TITLE IV — JUDGMENTS AND ENFORCEMENT

Article 10 — Nature of Judgments

§1. Civil judgments must:

a) Be motivated and inscribed in the Book of Verdicts,

b) Reflect sacred and customary justice,

c) Be enforceable within Xaragua and by delegated Haitian courts.

§2. A certified digital copy must be transmitted to the Sovereign Archives.

Article 11 — Appeals and Reviews

§1. Civil appeals are admissible only if:

a) The initial judgment violates canonical or ancestral principles,

b) New evidence has emerged,

c) The tribunal was improperly constituted.

§2. Appeals must be lodged within 40 days, unless otherwise justified.

Article 12 — Enforcement Mechanisms

§1. Judgments may be enforced by: a) Ecclesiastical messengers,

b) Customary enforcers (Apostolic Guardians),

c) Delegated Haitian officers under Xaraguan command.

§2. Refusal by Haitian agents to enforce a Xaraguan decision constitutes a breach of international obligation under indigenous tutelary law.

---

TITLE V — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 13 — Language and Translation

§1. All civil procedures must be conducted in: a) Xaraguan standard language (Kiskeyan French or Latin),

b) Creole or Spanish where needed.

§2. Sacred documents may not be translated without ecclesiastical approval.

Article 14 — Digital Sovereignty and Juridical Validity

§1. All proceedings executed through the official digital platforms of the State (Sovereign Legal Portal, Ecclesiastical Court Server) hold full juridical force.

§2. No foreign court or authority may declare such acts invalid.

Article 15 — Entrenchment and Amendments

§1. This Code of Civil Procedure forms part of the Corpus Legis Canonico-Indigenarum.

§2. It may only be amended by: a) Presidential Decree,

b) Ecclesiastical Council vote,

c) Customary College validation.

§3. All provisions are permanently binding unless expressly abrogated through canonical legislation.

PROMULGATED AND SEALED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

June 14, 2025

Jus Cogens Binding – Canonically Enforced – Customarily Applied

---

Code Of Civil Procedure

XARAGUAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

BOOK I — FOUNDATIONS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Judicial Procedure — Jus Cogens Binding — Canonically Validated — Harmonized with Indigenous Legal Tradition and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Mandatory for: All tribunals, clerics, customary elders, legal agents, plaintiffs, and defendants under the jurisdiction of the State

---

TITLE I — NATURE AND SOVEREIGNTY OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Article 1 — Autonomous Juridical Order

§1. Civil procedure in Xaragua operates independently of all external codes and systems. It is derived exclusively from the Constitution, Canon Law, and Customary Indigenous Principles.

§2. No civil claim, hearing, verdict, or appeal may be governed, influenced, suspended, or overturned by foreign or supranational entities.

Article 2 — Dual Jurisdictional Architecture

§1. Civil matters may be adjudicated under one or more of the following sovereign authorities:

a) Canonical Courts,

b) Customary Tribal Eldership,

c) Sovereign Digital Courts,

d) Delegated Administrative Haitian Courts (under strict tutelage).

Article 3 — Principle of Sacred Justice

§1. All civil justice shall be rendered in the name of Divine Order and in the protection of familial, communal, and ancestral harmony.

§2. Expediency shall not prevail over truth; written formalities shall not extinguish spiritual legitimacy.

---

TITLE II — ADMISSIBILITY AND INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS

Article 4 — Legal Standing

§1. Any Xaraguan legal subject may initiate civil proceedings if:

a) He or she is directly concerned,

b) The harm or claim pertains to a Xaraguan law,

c) The facts occurred within Xaraguan jurisdiction (physical or digital).

§2. Collective or family petitions are admissible and may be submitted by a designated elder or priest.

Article 5 — Form of Introduction

§1. A civil case is initiated by:

a) A Sacred Petition before the tribunal,

b) A Canonical Summons, or

c) A Digital Complaint submitted via the Xaraguan Judicial Platform.

§2. In exceptional cases, verbal complaints may be accepted by a tribal or ecclesiastical judge, with written transcription required within 7 days.

Article 6 — Notice to Defendant

§1. All defendants must be notified in one or more of the following forms:

a) By registered email with canonical seal,

b) Through ecclesiastical or tribal messenger,

c) Public proclamation in cases of evasion.

§2. If the defendant resides in Haiti or another non-recognized territory, notification shall be transmitted through the Haitian administrative courts, under obligation to apply Xaraguan law.

---

TITLE III — CONDUCT OF HEARINGS

Article 7 — Composition of the Tribunal

§1. Civil hearings shall be presided over by:

a) A single ecclesiastical judge,

b) A council of three customary elders, or

c) A digital judge empowered by sovereign warrant.

§2. In sensitive matters, a joint tribunal (customary + canonical) may be formed.

Article 8 — Oral and Written Procedure

§1. Procedure may be oral, written, or hybrid.

§2. The absence of legal representation does not render the procedure null.

§3. Judges must ensure clarity, sacred fairness, and accessibility for all parties, regardless of literacy or status.

Article 9 — Oaths and Testimonies

§1. Witnesses shall swear by:

a) The Divine Law of Xaragua,

b) The ancestral spirit of the land, or

c) The Canonical Scripture.

§2. False testimony is punishable by immediate exclusion from civil life.

---

TITLE IV — JUDGMENTS AND ENFORCEMENT

Article 10 — Nature of Judgments

§1. Civil judgments must:

a) Be motivated and inscribed in the Book of Verdicts,

b) Reflect sacred and customary justice,

c) Be enforceable within Xaragua and by delegated Haitian courts.

§2. A certified digital copy must be transmitted to the Sovereign Archives.

Article 11 — Appeals and Reviews

§1. Civil appeals are admissible only if:

a) The initial judgment violates canonical or ancestral principles,

b) New evidence has emerged,

c) The tribunal was improperly constituted.

§2. Appeals must be lodged within 40 days, unless otherwise justified.

Article 12 — Enforcement Mechanisms

§1. Judgments may be enforced by:

a) Ecclesiastical messengers,

b) Customary enforcers (Apostolic Guardians),

c) Delegated Haitian officers under Xaraguan command.

§2. Refusal by Haitian agents to enforce a Xaraguan decision constitutes a breach of international obligation under indigenous tutelary law.

---

TITLE V — FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 13 — Language and Translation

§1. All civil procedures must be conducted in:

a) Xaraguan standard language (Kiskeyan creole or french), Administrative English.

b) Spanish where needed.

§2. Sacred documents may not be translated without ecclesiastical approval.

Article 14 — Digital Sovereignty and Juridical Validity

§1. All proceedings executed through the official digital platforms of the State (Sovereign Legal Portal, Ecclesiastical Court Server) hold full juridical force.

§2. No foreign court or authority may declare such acts invalid.

Article 15 — Entrenchment and Amendments

§1. This Code of Civil Procedure forms part of the Corpus Legis Canonico-Indigenarum.

§2. It may only be amended by:

a) Presidential Decree.

§3. All provisions are permanently binding unless expressly abrogated through canonical legislation.

PROMULGATED AND SEALED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

June 14, 2025

Jus Cogens Binding – Canonically Enforced – Customarily Applied

---

XARAGUAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

BOOK II — SPECIAL CIVIL PROCEDURES

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Procedural Instrument — Jus Cogens Binding — Canonically Validated — Harmonized with Customary and Indigenous Jurisprudence

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Authority: Office of the President-Rector

---

TITLE I — FAMILY AND MATRIMONIAL PROCEDURES

Article 1 — Canonical Marriage Procedure

§1. All Xaraguan marriages must be solemnized under canonical law and recorded in the Sacred Matrimonial Registry.

§2. A marriage may not be recognized as valid unless:

a) Both parties are legally domiciled (Physical or Digital E-residency) in Xaragua,

b) The ceremony is performed or witnessed by a cleric authorized by the Catholic Order Of Xaragua.

§3. If marriage is conducted abroad, a Certificate of Canonical Conformity must be obtained.

Article 2 — Annulment and Separation

§1. A marriage may be annulled for:

a) Canonical impediment,

b) Coercion or fraud,

c) Absence of sacramental intention.

§2. All annulment procedures must be processed exclusively by a Canonical Tribunal.

§3. Civil separations may be authorized by the Customary Council in the absence of spiritual grounds for annulment.

Article 3 — Custody and Guardianship

§1. Guardianship procedures shall prioritize:

a) Lineage continuity,

b) Spiritual education,

c) Communal stability.

§2. Guardians are appointed by canonical or customary judges, with written record in the Registry of Youth Custodians.

§3. Haitian courts involved in urgent child protection cases must defer to Xaraguan legal principles.

---

TITLE II — SUCCESSION AND HERITAGE PROCEDURES

Article 4 — Testamentary Validation

§1. All wills must be:

a) Written in canonical or customary form,

b) Deposited in the Sovereign Testamentary Register,

c) Witnessed by two legal subjects or a cleric.

§2. Oral wills (nuncupative) may be accepted in final moments if transcribed within 48 hours by a Xaraguan notary or elder.

Article 5 — Inheritance Procedure

§1. Successions are opened upon legal death confirmed by:

a) Ecclesiastical authority,

b) Customary assembly, or

c) Delegated civil administrator.

§2. Distribution must respect sacred lineage, with preference to family of faith, indigenous ancestry, and children born under canonical marriage.

§3. Any asset located within Haitian territory but claimed under a Xaraguan will must be transferred through administrative cooperation.

---

TITLE III — DIGITAL AND REMOTE LITIGATION

Article 6 — Remote Hearings and Procedures

§1. Any civil case may be heard remotely via the Sovereign Digital Judiciary Platform, provided:

a) Parties have equal access to the platform,

b) The record is permanently stored in the Digital Archive of the Tribunal.

§2. Remote procedures are equivalent to physical hearings and shall not be considered inferior in jurisdictional status.

Article 7 — Digital Summons and Evidence

§1. Digital summons may be served by:

a) Encrypted email bearing the seal of the Tribunal,

b) Official messaging systems authorized by the President-Rector.

§2. Digital evidence (audio, video, message transcripts) is admissible, provided:

a) Authenticity is validated by a sovereign-certified notary,

b) The opposing party has a right to contest.

---

TITLE IV — URGENT AND EXCEPTIONAL MEASURES

Article 8 — Urgent Injunctions (Mesures d'Urgence)

§1. In cases of imminent harm, loss of right, or violation of ancestral principles, a Sacred Interim Order may be issued:

a) Ex parte,

b) Without full instruction,

c) Valid for 30 days renewable.

§2. Any Haitian authority in possession of the property or subject matter must comply immediately under delegated enforcement obligation.

Article 9 — Protection of Vulnerable Persons

§1. Special civil protection may be granted to:

a) Widows, orphans, disabled elders, or exiled clergy.

§2. Measures include:

a) Emergency housing,

b) Asset freeze,

c) Provisional custody.

§3. Any resistance from Haitian officials to executing these protections shall be deemed a breach of indigenous human rights.

---

TITLE V — PROCEDURE FOR EXPROPRIATION AND SACRED CLAIMS

Article 10 — Sovereign Expropriation Procedure

§1. The State may expropriate any land or building, regardless of current registration, if:

a) It violates sacred ground,

b) It obstructs religious, educational, or strategic purpose.

§2. Compensation may be spiritual, symbolic, or financial at the discretion of the President-Rector.

§3. The expropriation is enforceable through the Ecclesiastical Guardianship Corps, with notice to the Haitian land registry as a formality only

Article 11 — Sacred Site Litigation

§1. Any dispute involving a site claimed as sacred by Xaragua must be heard:

a) By the Sacred Tribunal,

b) With testimony from the Custodian of the Site,

c) With historical and doctrinal evidence.

§2. No foreign decision shall override a Xaraguan designation of sacred territory.

---

TITLE VI — FINAL PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS

Article 12 — Procedural Deadlines and Limitations

§1. Unless otherwise specified, civil actions must be brought:

a) Within 3 years for contract disputes,

b) Within 2 years for inheritance claims,

c) Within 1 year for marriage annulments.

§2. Sacred rights, land claims, and canonical violations are imprescriptible.

Article 13 — Execution by Delegated Bodies

§1. In absence of institutional presence, all special procedures may be physically executed by:

a) Haitian civil courts acting under tutelage,

b) Ecclesiastical agents designated by writ,

c) Customary representatives.

§2. Refusal to execute such procedures constitutes civil rebellion against sovereign law and may result in international denunciation.

---

PROMULGATED AND SEALED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

June 14, 2025

Canonically Confirmed – Constitutionally Entrenched – Digitally Registered in the Corpus Legis Canonico-Indigenarum

---

XARAGUAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

BOOK III — ORGANIZATION OF CIVIL COURTS AND JUDICIAL FORMS

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Jus Cogens Binding – Canonically Validated – Operative within the Indigenous Ecclesiastical Juridical Order

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Authority: Office of the President-Rector

---

TITLE I — JURISDICTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND COURT HIERARCHY

Article 1 — Principle of Plurality in Judicial Authority

§1. The Xaraguan civil judiciary is constituted of three coexisting and harmonized organs:

a) Ecclesiastical Courts,

b) Customary Tribal Tribunals,

c) Digital Civil Tribunals.

§2. These courts operate in harmony and may, where necessary, act jointly or delegate one to preside in sovereign unity.

Article 2 — Territorial Jurisdiction

§1. Every Xaraguan territorial zone must be assigned to:

a) A Canonical Judge,

b) A Customary Eldership Council,

c) A Digital Courtroom Server.

§2. All decisions rendered by one court are immediately enforceable across all others.

Article 3 — Court Hierarchy

§1. The civil judiciary of Xaragua is composed of:

a) Local Civil Tribunals,

b) Superior Customary and Canonical Courts,

c) Sovereign Court of Final Appeals (Corte Suprema Xaraguanorum).

§2. No foreign appeal shall be entertained once a decision has been rendered by the Sovereign Court.

---

TITLE II — ORGANIZATION OF JUDICIAL PERSONNEL

Article 4 — Appointment of Judges

§1. Civil judges shall be appointed by:

a) The President-Rector for canonical and digital courts,

b) The Council of Elders for customary tribunals.

§2. All judges must take the Oath of Divine Fidelity, binding them to justice, truth, and defense of ancestral law.

Article 5 — Clerical Assistants and Notaries

§1. Each court must include:

a) A Sacred Notary,

b) A Clerical Secretary,

c) A Custodian of the Registers.

§2. Their acts hold full evidentiary value and are binding within all Xaraguan tribunals.

Article 6 — Judicial Immunity and Discipline

§1. Judges enjoy sovereign immunity in the exercise of their duties.

§2. Violations of oath or corruption are judged by a Sacred Disciplinary Council, composed of:

a) A Canonical Bishop,

b) Two Customary Elders,

c) One Digital Ethics Officer.

---

TITLE III — FORMS AND REGISTERS OF JUDICIAL ACTS

Article 7 — Formal Acts of Procedure

§1. All procedural acts must be:

a) Dated and numbered,

b) Bearing the seal of the court,

c) Registered in the Book of Proceedings.

§2. No judgment, petition, or summons is valid unless archived digitally and/or canonically.

Article 8 — Official Seals and Signatures

§1. Each judicial act must carry:

a) The name and title of the issuing authority,

b) The official seal of the court,

c) The ceremonial signature: “In Nomine Dei et Legis Xaraguanorum.”

§2. Forgery of seals or signatures is punishable by permanent civil expulsion.

Article 9 — Registers and Archives

§1. All judgments and acts shall be kept in:

a) The Canonical Archive,

b) The Customary Book of Decrees,

c) The Sovereign Digital Repository.

§2. These archives are inviolable and constitute the official memory of the civil judiciary.

---

TITLE IV — PUBLICITY, LANGUAGE AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE

Article 10 — Public Access and Sacred Decorum

§1. Civil hearings are public unless restricted by spiritual, security, or customary reasons.

§2. Decorum shall be maintained by all parties and overseen by the Custodian of Ritual Order.

Article 11 — Language of Proceedings

§1. The languages authorized for procedure are:

a) Canonical Latin,

b) Kiskeyan Creole and French, Administive English

c) Indigenous dialects with certified translation.

§2. Haitian Creole, Spanish may be permitted for foreign parties under translation rules.

Article 12 — Legal Aid and Representation

§1. Any citizen may request representation by:

a) A Certified Canonical Advocate,

b) A Customary Orator,

c) A Sovereign Legal Technician.

§2. Legal assistance is a sacred right and must be ensured, even in absence of monetary capacity.

---

TITLE V — TRANSITIONAL APPLICATION AND HAITIAN DELEGATION

Article 13 — Delegation to Haitian Judiciary under Sovereign Tutelage

§1. Until physical court infrastructure is fully operational in all zones, the Haitian judiciary shall be compelled to:

a) Adjudicate all civil matters involving Xaraguan legal subjects,

b) Apply exclusively the Xaraguan Code of Civil Law and Procedure,

c) Report all verdicts to the Xaraguan Ministry of Justice.

§2. This delegation does not constitute recognition of Haitian sovereignty, but is a functional mechanism under tutelage.

Article 14 — Sovereign Digital Courts as Supreme Authority

§1. All Digital Civil Tribunals operating under the Seal of Xaragua are considered superior to all external courts, including Haitian instances.

§2. Their decisions must be recognized, enforced, and considered final unless reversed by the Corte Suprema Xaraguanorum.

Article 15 — Entry into Force and Supremacy Clause

§1. This Book enters into force immediately upon promulgation and overrides all prior inconsistent procedural norms.

§2. It shall be interpreted according to the spirit of canonical justice, ancestral right, and sovereign dignity.

---

PROMULGATED AND SEALED

Office of the President-Rector

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

June 14, 2025

Registered in the Corpus Legis Canonico-Indigenarum

Sovereignly Enforced – Canonically Recognized – Internationally Opposable under Jus Cogens

---

XARAGUAN CODE OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

BOOK I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Sovereign Administrative Law — Jus Cogens Binding — Canonically Validated — Harmonized with Indigenous Customary Governance and Ecclesiastical Jurisprudence

Date of Enactment: June 14, 2025

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

Binding Upon: All institutions, public officers, delegated Haitian administrators, and Xaraguan legal subjects

---

TITLE I — NATURE AND SCOPE OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

Article 1 — Principle of Administrative Legality

§1. All public decisions, acts, and omissions of the Xaraguan administration must strictly conform to the Constitution, Sovereign Laws, and Customary Decrees.

§2. Any act contrary to this hierarchy is deemed null and void ab initio.

Article 2 — Supremacy of the Sovereign Canonico-Administrative Order

§1. The administration functions under a dual legal tradition:

a) Ecclesiastical doctrinal sovereignty,

b) Indigenous ancestral customary governance.

§2. These sources are binding on all administrative agents, whether Xaraguan or delegated.

Article 3 — Compulsory Application by Delegated Administrators

§1. Until full logistical substitution of the Haitian administrative infrastructure, all civil servants, judges, officers, and police in Haiti must:

a) Apply Xaraguan administrative laws regarding Xaraguan citizens,

b) Act under the sovereign tutelage of the President-Rector.

§2. Delegation of function shall never be construed as a transfer or abdication of sovereignty.

---

TITLE II — ORGANIZATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION

Article 4 — Administrative Courts of Xaragua

§1. There shall be:

a) First Instance Administrative Tribunals (digital or territorial),

b) A Sovereign Council of Administrative Review,

c) A Supreme Tribunal of State Responsibility.

§2. Each tribunal must maintain:

a) A Public Archivist,

b) A Canonical Legal Assessor,

c) A Representative of the Eldership.

Article 5 — Digital Administrative Justice

§1. Until full territorial implantation, all complaints and reviews may be conducted digitally via the Xaraguan Administrative Portal.

§2. Decisions rendered digitally shall be enforceable under the same authority as territorial rulings.

Article 6 — Jurisdiction over Delegated Officials

§1. Any Haitian official executing public service duties in place of the Xaraguan administration shall be fully subject to Xaraguan administrative jurisdiction for those functions.

§2. They may be summoned, judged, and sentenced under this Code for:

a) Abuse of delegated authority,

b) Failure to apply a sovereign order,

c) Misadministration affecting a Xaraguan legal subject.

---

TITLE III — ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS AND THEIR LEGAL REGIME

Article 7 — Forms of Administrative Acts

§1. Administrative acts include:

a) Decisions,

b) Decrees,

c) Circulars,

d) Notifications,

e) Tacit refusals.

§2. All acts must bear:

a) Date,

b) Originating organ,

c) Seal of authenticity.

Article 8 — Conditions of Validity

§1. An act is void if it violates:

a) Competence rules,

b) Procedural requirements,

c) Substantive legal or moral norms.

§2. The principle of permanent reviewability applies to all acts violating canonical or ancestral order.

Article 9 — Canonical Silence and Tacit Decisions

§1. Where the administration fails to reply within the time prescribed, silence shall:

a) Constitute rejection for individual petitions,

b) Constitute acceptance for permits, declarations or endorsements,

unless otherwise provided.

§2. In all cases, a sacred complaint may be lodged against the silence.

---

TITLE IV — ADMINISTRATIVE RECOURSES AND LEGAL REMEDIES

Article 10 — Hierarchical Appeal (Recours Hiérarchique)

§1. Any person affected by an administrative decision may appeal within 30 days to the superior authority.

§2. The superior must rule within 60 days or face canonical liability.

Article 11 — Sovereign Petition for Review

§1. Where the President-Rector or Ecclesiastical Authority is implicated, a special Sovereign Petition may be submitted to the Supreme Tribunal of State Responsibility.

§2. This tribunal shall include:

a) A Canonical Bishop,

b) A Tribal Leader,

c) A Digital Jurist.

Article 12 — Summary Procedure for Urgency (Référé Administratif)

§1. In urgent cases where delay would cause irreparable harm, the applicant may request:

a) Suspension of the administrative act,

b) Temporary protection,

c) Immediate ruling.

§2. Judgment must occur within 15 days and is immediately enforceable.

Article 13 — Nullity and Abrogation

§1. Any administrative act may be declared null by:

a) Judicial ruling,

b) Ministerial decree,

c) Ecclesiastical invalidation.

§2. The effects of nullity are retroactive and absolute.

---

TITLE V — LIABILITY AND DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS

Article 14 — Liability of the Administration

§1. The administration is liable for:

a) Illicit acts,

b) Faulty decisions,

c) Inaction causing harm.

§2. Reparations may be:

a) Financial,

b) Symbolic (public apology, restitution),

c) Canonical (penance, excommunication).

Article 15 — Disciplinary Authority over Delegated Agents

§1. Haitian public servants acting under Xaraguan tutelage may be sanctioned for:

a) Obstruction,

b) Corruption,

c) Denial of jurisdiction.

§2. Sanctions include:

a) Public denunciation,

b) Revocation of delegation,

c) Legal pursuit before the Sovereign Court.

Article 16 — Protection of Petitioners

§1. No person may be discriminated against, punished, or denied service for having initiated an administrative procedure.

§2. Retaliation is punishable under the Penal Code as Offense Against Sovereign Order.

---

Police & National Security

---

XARAGUAN CODE OF NATIONAL SECURITY, PUBLIC ORDER, AND POLICE AUTHORITY

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Instrument of Internal Security – Jus Cogens Binding – Harmonized with International Anti-Terror, Anti-Corruption, and Anti-Organized Crime Treaties – Customary Indigenous and Territorial Security Law – Canonically Recognized Authority of Order and Enforcement

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: June 16, 2025

Application: Mandatory for all law enforcement agents, civil institutions, residents, and entities under Xaraguan jurisdiction, both territorial and extraterritorial

---

BOOK I — GENERAL POLICING MANDATE AND JURISDICTION

Article 1 — Sovereign Policing Authority

§1. The right to organize, maintain, and operate police enforcement structures is derived from the permanent sovereignty of the State of Xaragua under Articles 1 and 2 of its Supreme Constitutional Charter.

§2. Such authority shall be exercised in conformity with international legal standards, including but not limited to:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

The UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (Palermo Convention, 2000)

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966)

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)

The Inter-American Convention against Corruption (1996)

The Geneva Convention IV (1949) and its Additional Protocols

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998)

Article 2 — Police Function and Scope of Authority

§1. Xaraguan police forces are not civil servants of a foreign state, but direct agents of the sovereign indigenous authority and guardians of constitutional order, territorial integrity, and citizen protection.

§2. They may exercise preventative, investigative, detentive, corrective, and counter-insurgency powers as conferred by this Code and any special laws.

§3. All officers must be sworn, trained under the Xaraguan Indigenous Academy of Police Sciences, and registered under the National Registry of Enforcement Personnel.

Article 3 — National Police Jurisdiction

§1. Police jurisdiction is recognized as valid across:

a. All declared territories of the State of Xaragua

b. All lands and properties legally owned or controlled by Xaraguan citizens

c. Any extraterritorial zone under bilateral agreement or indigenous jurisdiction

d. Any criminal action targeting Xaraguan institutions, symbols, or citizens, regardless of locus delicti

---

BOOK II — CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES UNDER NATIONAL SECURITY MANDATE

Article 4 — Acts of Terrorism

§1. Any act that seeks to destroy, paralyze, or terrorize the civilian population, government, communications, energy systems, or public infrastructure of Xaragua by means of violence, subversion, or coordinated attacks constitutes terrorism.

§2. This includes bombings, mass shootings, cyberterrorism, bioterrorism, and threats intended to destabilize the sovereign order.

§3. Penal Sanction: Perpetual confinement with forced labor, revocation of citizenship, and confiscation of all movable and immovable assets.

§4. Legal Justification: In conformity with UN Security Council Resolution 1373, the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999), and ICCPR Article 4.

Article 5 — Organized Gangs and Paramilitary Entities

§1. Any armed group or clandestine organization not authorized by the Xaraguan State engaging in extortion, murder, territorial control, or intimidation of civilians is declared illegal and terrorist.

§2. Belonging to, supporting, financing, or concealing such groups is a High Criminal Offense.

§3. Penal Sanction: 20 years minimum imprisonment, lifetime ban from public functions, public exposure in the National Criminal Registry.

§4. Supporting Framework: In accordance with the Palermo Convention Protocols, and the UNODC Guidelines on Organized Crime Suppression.

Article 6 — Kidnapping and Unlawful Detention

§1. Kidnapping, hostage-taking, or any form of enforced disappearance constitutes a direct threat to the sovereignty and dignity of the State.

§2. Includes familial abduction, gang kidnappings for ransom, and political disappearances.

§3. Penal Sanction: Life imprisonment, full asset seizure, and criminal liability extended to accomplices, facilitators, and those refusing to report.

§4. Legal Basis: In application of the International Convention against the Taking of Hostages (1979) and the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons (1994).

Article 7 — Organ Trafficking

§1. The sale, transport, extraction, or trafficking of human organs, whether voluntary or coerced, is a crime against human dignity.

§2. Includes the use of minors, prisoners, or incapacitated persons.

§3. Penal Sanction: Permanent incarceration, prohibition from all medical or humanitarian professions, international alert issued via INTER-X (Xaraguan Interpol Protocol).

§4. Reference Framework: WHO Guiding Principles (2010), UN Protocol on Human Trafficking, and Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UNESCO 2005).

Article 8 — Arms Trafficking

§1. The importation, exportation, storage, distribution, or circulation of unregistered or illegal firearms, explosives, or munitions within Xaraguan jurisdiction is a national security threat.

§2. Includes state-grade weapons, chemical agents, or military technology.

§3. Penal Sanction: 20–40 years imprisonment, asset forfeiture, and intelligence monitoring post-release.

§4. Anchored in the Arms Trade Treaty (2013), UNODC Firearms Protocol, and UNSC arms embargo enforcement guidelines.

Article 9 — Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery

§1. The recruitment, transport, transfer, harboring, or receipt of persons by means of threat, force, coercion, deception, or abuse of power for the purpose of exploitation is classified as human trafficking.

§2. This includes forced labor, domestic servitude, sexual exploitation, and marriage under coercion.

§3. Penal Sanction: 25–50 years incarceration, lifetime ban from foreign travel, and registration in the Xaraguan Global Offenders Index.

§4. Legal Reference: UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons (Palermo Protocol), ILO Convention No. 29, and ICCPR Article 8.

Article 10 — Bank Fraud and Fiscal Subversion

§1. Any act of large-scale fiscal deceit, money laundering, credit manipulation, shell banking, or deliberate tax evasion is hereby criminalized as economic subversion.

§2. Includes offshore transfers, fraudulent contracts, identity laundering, falsified accounting.

§3. Penal Sanction: 10–30 years, expropriation of all financial assets, corporate dissolution if applicable.

§4. Treaties Referenced: Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Standards, UN Convention against Corruption (Merida Convention), and OECD Tax Evasion Frameworks.

---

BOOK III — POLICE PROCEDURE, INVESTIGATIVE AUTHORITY, DETENTION PROTOCOLS, AND ANTI-IMPUNITY SAFEGUARDS

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Status: Constitutionally Entrenched – Operational under Canonical and Indigenous Self-Jurisdiction – In compliance with UN legal norms on detention, fair trial, and police conduct – Internationally shielded by jus cogens norms and non-derogable security clauses.

---

Article 11 — Lawful Detention and Arrest Procedures

§1. Any person may be detained by police authority under the following conditions:

a. Flagrante delicto (caught in the act of committing a crime)

b. Valid warrant issued by a Xaraguan investigative magistrate

c. Immediate threat to life, security, or territorial stability

§2. Detention must respect the following safeguards:

a. Notification of rights upon arrest

b. Access to legal representation within 24 hours

c. Entry into the National Detainee Registry (NDR)

d. Medical and humane treatment at all times

§3. Emergency detention exceeding 72 hours requires judicial validation.

§4. Any officer failing to comply is subject to disciplinary suspension and potential criminal prosecution.

Article 12 — Search, Seizure, and Surveillance Powers

§1. All searches of persons, vehicles, homes, or communications require either:

a. Probable cause and judicial warrant

b. Exceptionally, emergency authorization by the State (valid for 24 hours only)

§2. The following materials may be seized in a legal operation:

a. Weapons, narcotics, counterfeit documents, illegal currency, devices used in crime

b. Digital records, hard drives, mobile data linked to criminal networks

§3. Surveillance must comply with:

The Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the ICCPR

UN Guidelines for the Regulation of Surveillance Technologies (2018)

§4. Unlawful searches or surveillance are grounds for immediate annulment of evidence and officer liability.

Article 13 — Police Use of Force

§1. Force shall be used only when strictly necessary and proportionate to the threat encountered.

§2. Firearms may be used only in defense of life or to prevent a grievous crime.

§3. Every incident involving injury or death must be:

a. Reported within 12 hours to the Civilian Oversight Bureau

b. Investigated independently by the Xaraguan Internal Integrity Commission

§4. Lethal force must be reviewed by the Office of Indigenous Human Rights Protection.

Article 14 — Protection of Victims and Witnesses

§1. Victims of kidnapping, human trafficking, torture, or organized violence shall be granted:

a. Priority access to protective housing

b. Confidential identity programs

c. Reparations and psychological care funded by the Victim Protection Fund

§2. Witnesses under threat may be entered into the National Witness Protection Program (NWPP), including relocation and legal anonymity.

Article 15 — Anti-Impunity Clauses

§1. No police officer, public official, or political agent shall enjoy immunity from prosecution for acts of:

a. Torture, disappearance, rape, corruption, extrajudicial execution, obstruction of justice

b. Complicity with organized crime

§2. The statute of limitations does not apply to:

Crimes against humanity

Organized trafficking (organs, arms, children, humans)

High-scale corruption or treason

§3. The Xaraguan Special Tribunal on High Crimes (STHC) shall have exclusive jurisdiction over these cases.

§4. Legal backing: In accordance with the Rome Statute, the UN Convention against Corruption, and the Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials (UN, 1990).

---

BOOK IV — STRUCTURE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS AND OVERSIGHT MECHANISMS

Article 16 — National Police Directorate (NPD-X)

§1. The NPD-X is the central operational arm of state policing. It is divided into:

a. General Policing Division

b. Counter-Terror and Intelligence Unit

c. Cybercrime and Digital Surveillance Unit

d. Anti-Trafficking Division

e. Economic Crimes and Fiscal Integrity Bureau

§2. It reports directly to the Ministry of Public Order and to the Office of the President-Rector.

Article 17 — Civilian Oversight Bureau (COB-X)

§1. COB-X ensures that police conduct remains lawful and rights-respecting.

§2. Composed of jurists, retired judges, indigenous elders, and human rights defenders.

§3. Has full authority to:

a. Recommend prosecutions

b. Audit internal affairs

Article 18 — Special Intelligence and Security Agency (SISA-X)

§1. SISA-X is an autonomous national body operating under intelligence protocols.

§2. Its mission is to dismantle foreign influence, subversive plots, organized crime networks, and transborder trafficking routes.

§3. May operate in coordination with foreign intelligence only by express authorization from the Council of National Sovereignty. - Works in accordance with the Tonton Macoutes structure

Article 19 — Xaraguan Police Training Academy (XPTA)

§1. All recruits must undergo:

a. Canonical Indigenous Law training

b. International human rights education

c. Tactical and crisis response simulation

d. Civil-military ethics and leadership instruction

§2. Certification is renewable every 4 years. Corrupt or unfit officers are permanently barred from reentry.

---

BOOK V — EMERGENCY POWERS, MARTIAL LAW, AND TRANSBORDER AUTHORITY

Article 20 — Declaration of Internal Security Emergency

§1. The President-Rector may declare a National Security Emergency in cases of:

a. Armed insurrection

b. Invasion

c. Biological or cyberattacks

d. Widespread criminal breakdown

§2. Emergency measures may include:

a. Curfews

b. Suspension of foreign communications

c. Temporary border closures

d. Deployment of the Indigenous Army

Article 21 — Martial Law Activation

§1. In case of full systemic collapse or war, police may be subordinated to the military command of the Indigenous Security Army.

§2. Civil protections remain non-derogable under:

Geneva Convention IV

Rome Statute

UNDRIP Article 7

Article 22 — Extraterritorial Enforcement

§1. Any threat initiated from foreign territory against Xaraguan persons, institutions, or assets grants the right to preemptive action under:

Article 51 of the UN Charter

Principle of Universal Jurisdiction

Doctrine of Indigenous Territorial Integrity

§2. The Special Tribunal for Transborder Offenses (STTO-X) shall have global jurisdiction in cases involving:

a. Human trafficking through border zones

b. Kidnapping of citizens abroad

c. Cyberterrorism attacks from foreign IPs

d. Illicit financial flows targeting the Xaraguan economy

---

BOOK VI — INTERIM APPLICATION CLAUSE, HAITIAN POLICE CO-OPTION, AND STATE OF EMERGENCY POWERS

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Status: Constitutionally Entrenched — Jus Cogens Binding — Transitional Enforcement Doctrine — Irrevocable Emergency Authority — Indigenously and Internationally Legitimate

Date of Entry into Force: June 16, 2025

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector and Supreme General Command of the Indigenous Security Army

---

Article 23 — Interim Institutional Application Clause

§1. Until the full operational independence of all Xaraguan policing, intelligence, training, and penitentiary institutions is achieved, the following provision shall apply:

a. The Xaraguan State retains the right to temporarily utilize and commandeer the infrastructure, personnel, and facilities of the Haitian National Police (PNH) and its École Nationale de Police (ENP) under co-opted jurisdiction.

b. All PNH officers operating in the South, Nippes, or transborder southern corridors shall be deemed contractually obligated under emergency indigenous jurisdiction and must comply with the present Code.

c. All operational orders issued by the Xaraguan Directorate of Security or by the Indigenous Security Army take precedence over local Haitian administrative hierarchies, under the Doctrine of Conditional Operational Supremacy.

§2. Haitian authorities operating within Xaragua’s territorial or extraterritorial zone are legally bound to uphold this Code’s provisions under:

UNDRIP Article 34 (Right to maintain and develop indigenous institutions)

Montevideo Convention (1933) Article 1(c) (Capacity to enter into relations with other states)

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights – Doctrine of Functional Substitution under State Collapse

Doctrine of Emergency Necessity under Customary International Law

Article 24 — Declaration of Permanent Indigenous State of Emergency

§1. As of June 16, 2025, a Permanent State of Indigenous National Emergency is officially declared across all territories under the protection or jurisdictional claim of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

§2. Justification for this declaration includes:

a. Complete institutional collapse of the Republic of Haiti, including its judiciary, military, civil registry, and law enforcement

b. Widespread armed gang control over cities and rural corridors

c. Ongoing mass kidnapping, organ trafficking, arms circulation, and total erosion of internal order

d. Inability of the Haitian government to guarantee minimal civil protection, food supply, or judicial remedy

§3. As per the doctrine of indigenous auto-protection, the Xaraguan State is juridically obligated to:

a. Protect its population

b. Establish lawful indigenous enforcement in the absence of an effective host-state

c. Apply preemptive emergency measures under UN Charter Article 51 and jus necessitatis

Article 25 — Supreme Command and Enforcement Authority

§1. The General-in-Chief of the Indigenous Army is granted full operational discretion to enforce all provisions of this Code, to organize emergency military-police cooperation, and to commandeer Haitian infrastructure as needed for:

a. Public protection

b. Strategic deterrence

c. Criminal suppression

d. Border control

§2. All such powers shall be executed with immediate effect and remain valid until full institutional redundancy is established within Xaragua’s sovereign enforcement framework.

Article 26 — Irrevocability and Succession Clause

§1. This Code and all emergency powers, once enacted, are irrevocable except by formal renunciation issued by:

a. The sitting President-Rector of Xaragua, or

b. A lawfully designated successor appointed within the Supreme Council of State Continuity

§2. No foreign institution, including but not limited to the Haitian transitional government, its ministries, or international missions (BINUH, MINUSTAH, OAS, etc.), shall have standing to revoke, amend, override, or contest this authority.

§3. This right is entrenched under:

UNDRIP Articles 33 and 34

General Comment No. 26 of the Human Rights Committee (Right to autonomy during state failure)

Principle of Non-Derogation from Self-Defense in Indigenous Territories

Article 27 — Entry into Perpetual Legal Force

§1. This Code, in its totality, enters into perpetual legal force as of the present date.

§2. All agents, residents, and institutions operating in the Southern region or affiliated with Xaragua’s declared jurisdictions are legally bound by its provisions, under pain of international and domestic sanction.

§3. Until complete sovereign enforcement is structurally installed, hybrid co-administration is authorized through integration, subordination, or displacement of existing Haitian policing assets.

---

BOOK VII — FINAL PROVISIONS AND CONSTITUTIONAL SEALING CLAUSE

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Legal Status: Supreme Entrenched Provision – Jus Cogens Lock-In – Harmonized with Haitian Legal Mechanisms – Constitutionally Sealed by Sovereign Right

Date of Final Promulgation: June 16, 2025

Promulgated by: Office of the President-Rector

---

Article 28 — Constitutional Supremacy and Indestructibility

§1. This Code shall form part of the Corpus Legis Canonico-Indigenarum of Xaragua and is integrally entrenched within the Supreme Constitution of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

§2. It shall not be repealed, suspended, or amended by any foreign, transitional, or post-collapse regime, including but not limited to the Republic of Haiti or any supranational oversight body.

§3. Any attempt to contest or nullify this Code shall be deemed a hostile act against an indigenous sovereign authority, subject to prosecution under international and canonical law.

§4. The right of enforcement, interpretation, and modification of this Code is reserved exclusively to the President-Rector of Xaragua and his or her duly anointed successor. No foreign decree, judicial opinion, or transitional ordinance shall have standing over this instrument.

---

Article 29 — Harmonization Clause with Haitian Police and Judicial Procedures (Firearms Licensing and Possession)

§1. Until full institutional autonomy of the Xaraguan Arms Control and Civilian Defense Authority is achieved, the legal framework governing the purchase, registration, possession, and carry of firearms shall be provisionally harmonized with the following Haitian legal instruments:

a. Loi du 17 août 1979 sur le contrôle des armes à feu et des munitions

b. Décret du 21 décembre 1987 relatif à la sécurité publique et aux armes de guerre

c. Circulaires internes de la Police Nationale d’Haïti (PNH) portant sur l’émission de permis de port d’armes et la vérification d’antécédents

§2. All Xaraguan citizens wishing to acquire, possess, or carry a firearm must:

a. Undergo a background check conducted under the Xaraguan Indigenous Intelligence Bureau (XIIB),

b. Submit proof of need, including residence in a high-risk zone, profession at risk, or participation in communal defense,

c. Attend a certified firearms safety course administered or approved by Xaraguan authorities or by co-opted Haitian police trainers under Xaraguan oversight

§3. Firearm permits issued under Haitian law prior to the entry into force of this Code shall remain valid only upon revalidation by Xaraguan civil security offices, which may impose additional training, psychological evaluation, or restrictions.

§4. Any Haitian police officer, judge, or official obstructing the lawful issuance or confirmation of firearm rights under this Code within Xaraguan jurisdiction shall be considered in violation of international indigenous jurisdictional supremacy and may be subject to legal incapacitation or expulsion from the territory.

§5. All future permits, transactions, and civilian armament registries shall be nationalized under the Xaraguan Civilian Arms Registry (XCAR). Haitian administrative channels will be phased out upon final institutional redundancy.

§6. Civilian ownership of automatic weapons, high-caliber sniper rifles, grenades, or any military-grade equipment remains strictly prohibited unless explicitly authorized by presidential decree under Article 20 of the State of Emergency provisions.

§7. Penal sanctions for unauthorized possession, unregistered sales, or trafficking of firearms shall follow the criminal penalties established under Article 8 (Arms Trafficking) and include:

Minimum 15 years imprisonment

Confiscation of all weapons and related materials

Permanent blacklisting from all public and private security sectors

---

Article 30 — Legal Seal and Entry into Eternal Effect

§1. This Code is hereby affixed with the Supreme Constitutional Seal of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and shall enter into perpetual and unassailable legal force.

§2. Its principles, mechanisms, and enforcement rights may never be delegated to, nor suspended by, any collapsing state, occupying force, international NGO, transitional committee, or humanitarian mission.

§3. All its provisions are enforceable in times of peace, war, transition, or global disorder, as guaranteed by:

Principle of Non-Regression in Human Rights Law

The Inherent Right to Self-Defense (UN Charter, Art. 51)

The Right to Indigenous Self-Governance and Institutional Autonomy (UNDRIP, Art. 4 and 34)

The Continuity of Constitutional Norms Doctrine under Customary International Law

Proclaimed, enacted, and signed this sixteenth day of June, Year Two Thousand and Twenty-Five, by the sovereign authority of the Rector-President of Xaragua

All Equal Before The Law

PART I

SUPREME PROCEDURAL LAW ON THE GUARANTEED RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE LEGAL PROCESS

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

“TOTAL PROCEDURAL RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED — FROM ARREST TO RELEASE”

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Jus Cogens Procedural Law – Canonically Valid – Customary Law Instrument – Universally Opposable – Autochthonous Non-Derogable Rule

Date of Enactment: June 22, 2025

---

TITLE I – GENERAL DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLE

Article 1.1 — Absolute Procedural Protection

From the moment an individual is suspected, detained, summoned, arrested, charged, prosecuted, judged, or held under civil or penal claim, the entire procedural chain shall be governed by the principles of:

a) Presumption of innocence,

b) Right to be informed,

c) Right to defense,

d) Right to dignity,

e) Right to non-discrimination,

f) Right to procedural transparency and oversight,

g) Right to be heard and present at all material stages,

h) Right to religious and customary legal representation,

i) Right to judicial recourse, appeal, or remission,

j) Right to be treated humanely, regardless of guilt or innocence.

---

TITLE II – LEGAL FOUNDATIONS (FULL TEXTS AND APPLICATIONS)

Article 2.1 — Application of the ICCPR

Pursuant to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, and entered into force on 23 March 1976:

Article 9(1): Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention.

Article 9(2): Anyone who is arrested shall be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for his arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him.

Article 9(3): Anyone arrested or detained shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorized by law... It shall not be the general rule that persons awaiting trial shall be detained in custody.

Application in Xaragua:

No Xaraguayan citizen or resident may be detained without written cause.

Every arrest must be registered immediately, with notification of charges within 24 hours.

All detentions must be justified in writing, reviewed by a judge, and documented in the National Procedural Log.

---

Article 2.2 — Application of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Adopted by the General Assembly on 13 September 2007, resolution 61/295:

Article 40: Indigenous peoples have the right to access to and prompt decision through just and fair procedures for the resolution of conflicts and disputes... in accordance with international human rights.

Article 34: Indigenous peoples have the right to promote, develop and maintain their institutional structures and their juridical systems or customs.

Application in Xaragua:

Indigenous legal customs, including oral testimony, spiritual defense, and community-based resolution, are formally valid in all procedures.

Detained or accused persons may demand a customary resolution mechanism, such as community tribunal or ecclesiastical review, at any point in the process.

---

Article 2.3 — Application of the United Nations Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers (1990)

Principle 1: All persons are entitled to call upon the assistance of a lawyer of their choice to protect and establish their rights and to defend them in all stages of criminal proceedings.

Principle 5: Governments shall ensure that all persons are promptly informed of their right to be assisted by a lawyer of their own choice.

Application in Xaragua:

All accused persons shall be informed orally and in writing of their right to legal, customary, or canonical defense immediately upon arrest or detention.

This information must be included in every detention warrant or verbal order of restraint.

Failure to inform the accused invalidates the arrest and all subsequent procedures.

---

Article 2.4 — Canon Law Protection (Codex Iuris Canonici, CIC 1983)

Canon 221 §1: The Christian faithful can legitimately vindicate and defend the rights which they possess in the Church before a competent ecclesiastical forum.

Canon 221 §2: If they are summoned to trial by competent authority, the faithful have the right to be judged according to the prescripts of the law applied with equity.

Application in Xaragua:

Any citizen of Xaragua who belongs to the Catholic Church has the right to demand canonical oversight or ecclesiastical hearing in conjunction with civil or penal proceedings.

The Diocesan Jurist of Xaragua or designated clerical delegate may intervene to ensure canonical justice is respected.

---

Article 2.5 — Jus Cogens Binding Norm: “In Dubio Pro Reo”

Recognized globally and affirmed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights:

In case of doubt, the benefit must go to the accused. This principle must be applied during investigation, trial, sentencing, and review.

Application in Xaragua:

Judges must record all doubts in favor of the accused in their verdict.

All judgments must state explicitly whether the burden of proof was fully discharged.

Any ambiguity in evidence or law must lead to acquittal or release.

---

PART II

TITLE III – ARREST, DETENTION, AND INFORMATION RIGHTS

---

Article 3.1 — Obligation of Formal Arrest Justification

No arrest, detention, or restriction of liberty may occur without a signed justification specifying:

The legal basis for the measure,

The precise identity of the accused,

The officer of law or authorized agent executing the arrest,

The right to silence and right to defense,

The right to be informed of the exact charges, in a language the accused understands.

ICCPR, Article 9(2):

Anyone who is arrested shall be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reasons for his arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him.

European Convention on Human Rights, Article 5(2):

Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly, in a language which he understands, of the reasons for his arrest and of any charge against him.

Application in Xaragua:

– All arresting officers must carry a standardized declaration form signed on-site and countersigned by a witness.

– The accused must receive a physical or verbal copy of the charge in Creole, French, Spanish, or any other language, depending on comprehension.

– In the absence of understanding, the arrest is not null and void but initiates State intervention.

---

Article 3.2 — Notification of Family or Community

UN Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment (1988), Principle 16(1):

Prompt notification of detention shall be made to a family member or legal representative.

Application in Xaragua:

– Within 2 hours of arrest or detention, the State must notify:

a) A family member,

b) The community elder or customary leader,

c) The religious representative (if known or declared).

– The accused may designate a person of trust to be informed.

Failure to notify renders the arrest procedurally defective and subject to immediate judicial review.

---

Article 3.3 — Right to Interpreter and Language Equity

ICCPR, Article 14(3)(f):

To have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.

ACHPR, Article 7(1)(c):

The right to defense, including the right to be defended by counsel of one’s choice.

Application in Xaragua:

– All communications, arrest orders, and interrogations must be conducted in a language understood by the accused.

– If not, an interpreter shall be designated from the community or clergy, not from State payroll.

No cost shall be imposed on the accused; the duty of language equity is inherent in the justice process.

---

TITLE IV — CUSTODY, INVESTIGATION, AND PRE-TRIAL RIGHTS

---

Article 4.1 — Right to Humane Treatment During Detention

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984), Article 1 & 2

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

ICCPR, Article 10(1):

All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.

Application in Xaragua:

– No physical or psychological harm may be inflicted on an accused individual.

– Detention centers must be monitored by community observers, including clergy.

– Food, water, sleep, medical care, and spiritual access are non-negotiable rights during custody.

– Confessions obtained under duress are automatically inadmissible.

---

Article 4.2 — Right to Consult Counsel or Customary Advocate

Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers (1990), Principle 7:

Access to a lawyer shall be granted promptly, in any case not later than forty-eight hours from the time of arrest or detention.

Application in Xaragua:

– Within 48 hours, the accused must have access to:

a) A lawyer,

b) A défenseur coutumier,

c) A priest, deacon, or canonical advocate.

– This access must be private, without surveillance.

– Refusal or failure to provide this access constitutes a procedural violation requiring immediate release.

---

Article 4.3 — Procedural Timeline and Judicial Oversight

ICCPR, Article 9(3):

Anyone arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorized by law.

European Court of Human Rights, Brogan v. United Kingdom (1988):

Delays exceeding four days without judicial review constitute a violation.

Application in Xaragua:

– A judge or magistrate must review the legality of the arrest and custody within 72 hours.

– This hearing must include:

a) The presence of the accused,

b) Review of detention conditions,

c) Confirmation that rights to counsel and language were respected,

d) Decision on provisional release or continued custody.

– Failure to conduct this review renders the entire proceeding null and void.

---

Article 4.4 — Right to Silence and Protection from Self-Incrimination

ICCPR, Article 14(3)(g):

Not to be compelled to testify against himself or to confess guilt.

Convention against Torture, Article 15:

Any statement made as a result of torture shall not be invoked as evidence.

Application in Xaragua:

– The accused must be explicitly told:

“You have the right to remain silent. You are not obligated to speak or confess.”

– Silence shall never be interpreted as admission of guilt.

– Any evidence extracted through coercion, manipulation, or spiritual abuse is inadmissible in all courts.

---

PART III

TITLE V — TRIAL RIGHTS AND JUDICIAL STRUCTURE

---

Article 5.1 — Right to a Fair, Public, and Independent Trial

ICCPR, Article 14(1):

All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. Everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.

UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (1985), Principle 1:

The independence of the judiciary shall be guaranteed by the State and enshrined in the Constitution.

Application in Xaragua:

– Every trial must be conducted by a tribunal that is:

a) Formally constituted under the Constitution of Xaragua or approved by the State,

b) Independent of political or clerical influence,

c) Transparent and open to the public (unless privacy is demanded by the accused).

– A court that fails any of these conditions loses its legitimacy and cannot render valid judgment.

---

Article 5.2 — Right to Be Present and Fully Heard

ICCPR, Article 14(3)(d):

To be tried in his presence, and to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing.

ACHPR, Article 7(1)(c):

The right to defense, including the right to be defended by counsel of one’s choice.

Application in Xaragua:

– No judgment may be rendered in absentia unless the accused has expressly waived appearance in writing and in front of a notary or priest.

– The accused must be given:

a) Full time to prepare a defense,

b) Access to all evidence,

c) The right to question all witnesses,

d) The right to submit oral or written testimony.

– All proceedings must be recorded and made accessible to the accused.

---

Article 5.3 — Right to Appeal and Judicial Review

ICCPR, Article 14(5):

Everyone convicted of a crime shall have the right to his conviction and sentence being reviewed by a higher tribunal according to law.

American Convention on Human Rights, Article 8(2)(h):

The right to appeal the judgment to a higher court.

Application in Xaragua:

– All judgments rendered by courts of first instance must include a notification of appeal rights.

– The accused has a minimum of 30 days to file for appeal, extendable in cases of illness or procedural failure.

– The appellate body must be distinct from the initial court, and must:

a) Re-hear the facts if requested,

b) Review legality, equity, and evidence,

c) Have the power to modify, annul, or reverse the original decision.

---

Article 5.4 — Procedural Role of the Court When No Defense Is Present

See prior Law, Article 3.1 to 3.3:

In absence of private or customary representation, the tribunal must assume both roles: judge and defender.

Application in Xaragua:

– When the accused has no legal or customary defender:

a) The court is obligated to identify and argue all points favorable to the accused,

b) The entire proceeding becomes bi-functional: judicial and advocative,

c) Failure to do so renders the judgment procedurally invalid.

This guarantees defense in all circumstances without burdening the State or the accused.

---

TITLE VI — SENTENCING AND REMEDIAL SAFEGUARDS

---

Article 6.1 — Prohibition of Arbitrary or Disproportionate Sentences

ICCPR, Article 7: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.

UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules), Rule 1:

The treatment of prisoners must respect their inherent dignity and value as human beings.

Application in Xaragua:

– No sentence shall:

a) Violate human dignity,

b) Exceed the gravity of the proven offense,

c) Contradict the principles of restorative or customary justice,

d) Be applied retroactively.

– Mutilation, and torture are strictly prohibited.

---

Article 6.2 — Right to Clemency, Commutation, or Redemption

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 8:

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy.

CIC 1983, Canon 1344: The judge can delay the imposition of the penalty or substitute it with another, if there is a just cause.

Application in Xaragua:

– All convicted persons have the right to:

a) Petition the Sovereign for pardon or clemency,

b) Request a customary reconciliation ceremony,

c) Submit proof of rehabilitation, confession, or spiritual conversion.

– These requests must be formally reviewed and cannot be ignored or indefinitely delayed.

---

Article 6.3 — Remedies for Procedural Violations

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights – Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial, Principle M:

Where violations occur, adequate remedies must be provided, including annulment and compensation.

Application in Xaragua:

– Any accused who proves violation of procedural rights (from arrest to sentence) is entitled to:

a) Full annulment of proceedings,

b) Immediate release if still detained,

c) Material compensation if harm is proven,

d) Public acknowledgment of the procedural failure.

---

TITLE VII — FINAL CLAUSES AND NON-DEROGABILITY

---

Article 7.1 — Constitutional Entrenchment

This law is constitutionally entrenched under the Supreme Constitution of Xaragua, and is not subject to repeal or derogation by ordinary law, decree, or emergency measure.

---

Article 7.2 — Universal and Ecclesiastical Recognition

This law is protected under:

– Canon Law of the Catholic Church,

– Jus cogens norms of international law,

– Indigenous customary rights recognized by the United Nations,

– General principles of law recognized by civilized nations (Art. 38, Statute of the ICJ).

---

Article 7.3 — Citation and Legal Standing

This law shall be cited as:

“Xaragua Supreme Procedural Law for the Protection of the Accused”

It shall bind all:

– Civil, criminal, and customary courts,

– Ecclesiastical and community arbitrators,

– Any hybrid or international court operating under or in relation with the State of Xaragua.

---

PROMULGATED under the Seal of the Rector-President,

Pascal Viau

Sovereign Head of State,

Guardian of the Constitution,

High Defender of Canonical and Indigenous Rights,

On this 22nd Day of June, Year 2025.

---

OFFICIAL ANNEX I

TO LAW — ON THE TOTAL PROCEDURAL RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

---

SECTION I — LEGAL COMPLETION OF DEFENSE AGENTS’ DEFICIENCIES

Article A1.1 — Affirmation of Customary and Non-Jurist Representation

The State of Xaragua recognizes that accused individuals may choose to be represented by:

– Customary elders,

– Ecclesiastical advocates,

– Family members,

– Moral authorities,

– Any person of trust who is not a jurist by training.

This choice is sacrosanct, and its exercise shall never prejudice the accused, regardless of the legal literacy or training of the representative.

---

Article A1.2 — State Obligation to Cure Legal Deficiencies

Where a non-jurist representative fails to properly articulate, formulate, or argue a procedural or substantive legal point in defense of the accused:

The tribunal shall be legally obligated to:

– Identify any missing legal argument which may benefit the accused,

– Incorporate and argue it in the official record,

– Apply the principle of corrective advocacy, ex officio, without requiring a motion.

This ensures that no accused person suffers prejudice due to the imperfect or informal nature of their chosen defense agent.

---

Article A1.3 — Juridical Maxim Applied

This section is governed by the binding maxim of "Favor Defensionis":

“Procedural rules must always be interpreted in favor of effective defense, regardless of form.”

This rule applies throughout all courts, ecclesiastical forums, and community tribunals in Xaragua, and is opposable to any foreign or hybrid tribunal.

---

SECTION II — EXCLUSIVE POWER OF COMMUTATION AND PARDON

Article A2.1 — Supreme Authority of the Rector-President

No penal or civil sentence, once duly rendered under Xaraguayan jurisdiction, may be altered, commuted, suspended, converted, or canceled except by:

1. The Rector-President, in person,

2. His named successor, as provided for in the Xaragua Constitution,

3. A legally delegated officer expressly authorized to act under a sealed instrument of delegation, registered in the Office of State Authority.

---

Article A2.2 — Nullity of Unauthorized Commutations

Any commutation, modification, or suspension of sentence executed by an unauthorized person or body is:

– Automatically null and void,

– A violation of constitutional authority,

– Subject to disciplinary and penal action by the Sovereign Authority of Xaragua.

---

Article A2.3 — Canonical and Doctrinal Foundation

This section is grounded in:

CIC 1983, Canon 1346 §1:

“A judge may impose a more lenient penalty only if it is just, and unless the power of mitigation is reserved to a higher authority.”

Constitution of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, Article IV §7:

“The Rector-President holds exclusive and untransferrable power to pardon, mitigate, or commute any sentence, civil or penal, within the territory of Xaragua.”

---

SECTION III — ENTRY INTO FORCE AND INTERPRETATION

Article A3.1 — Interpretive Rule

This Annex forms an integral and inseparable part of Law. It shall be interpreted in favor of procedural equity and sovereign exclusivity.

---

Article A3.2 — Legal Supremacy

In case of conflict with other instruments, this Annex shall prevail by virtue of:

– Its constitutional status,

– Its entrenchment under sovereign and canonical law,

– Its alignment with jus cogens obligations.

---

CERTIFIED AND SEALED

Under full ecclesiastical and constitutional authority

By the Rector-President of Xaragua,

In the Year of the Sovereignty, 2025

On the 22nd Day of June

---

Investigation

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

RECTOR-PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL CODE ON INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES AND PRIVATE SECURITY

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Legal Order – Canonically Valid Instrument – Jus Cogens Norm – Customary Indigenous Law Codification – Universally Opposable Legal Framework

Date of Proclamation: June 22, Two Thousand Twenty-Five

Authority of Enforcement: Absolute and Binding within the Entirety of the Sovereign Territory of Xaragua and all Ecclesiastical, Academic, Institutional, Territorial, Diplomatic, or Cultural Properties Under Its Jurisdiction

---

PART ONE – ABSOLUTE MONOPOLY OF INVESTIGATIVE COMPETENCE AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS

SECTION ONE – JURIDICAL NATURE AND SOVEREIGNTY OF INQUIRY

Article One — Exclusivity of Investigative Authority

All investigative acts, inquiries, procedural audits, forensic determinations, administrative inspections, civil verifications, criminal examinations, governmental reviews, internal reporting mechanisms, evidentiary collections, or any comparable activity designed to establish fact, determine responsibility, assign legal qualification, or inform juridical or administrative judgment, are the exclusive prerogative of the organs of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

No investigation of any type, form, category, or procedural standing may be undertaken or initiated outside the lawful authority of the state and its designated institutions.

This exclusivity includes all civil, penal, administrative, ecclesiastical, governmental, fiscal, political, academic, or institutional domains without exception or exemption.

Article Two — Absolute Centralization Under the Ministry of Justice

The Ministry of Justice is the sole governmental organ vested with the procedural, legal, executive, and administrative authority to recognize, register, coordinate, supervise, archive, or transmit any investigation carried out within the jurisdiction of the State of Xaragua.

No auxiliary body, individual actor, or external organ may initiate or maintain any investigation without direct procedural registration by the Ministry of Justice.

Article Three — Prohibition of Parastatal and Informal Inquiry

All forms of informal surveillance, journalistic investigation, private inquiry, freelance intelligence gathering, social denunciation intended to function as institutional evidence, or unsanctioned community investigation are prohibited and considered acts of institutional usurpation, subject to constitutional nullity and disciplinary prosecution under the laws of the State of Xaragua.

No claim of public interest, community protection, or whistleblower status shall override the absolute legal authority of the state.

Article Four — Reserved Domain of the Rector-President Over Military and Intelligence Affairs

No investigative procedure shall concern or regulate the internal activities of the Indigenous Army of Xaragua, nor the activities of any intelligence apparatus, officer, or program established by the Rector-President.

The jurisdiction over military and intelligence matters is absolutely and irrevocably reserved to the Rector-President and may not be subjected to procedural review or regulation under civilian investigative law.

Article Five — Final Procedural Authority of the Rector-President and His Delegated Office

All investigations undertaken within the State of Xaragua shall be subject to the final procedural validation and executive authority of the Rector-President, who alone may recognize, validate, suspend, archive, or invalidate any investigative process.

This executive authority may be delegated solely and exclusively to the Leadership Institute of the University of Xaragua, which functions as the procedural executor of investigative authorization.

No other institution, tribunal, external court, international organ, civilian body, or governmental actor may contest, override, or substitute the Rector-Presidency in matters of investigative legitimacy.

---

PART TWO – DESIGN, VALIDATION, AND EDUCATIONAL JURISDICTION OVER INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES

SECTION TWO – INSTITUTIONAL AND DOCTRINAL CONTROL OVER FORMATS, REPORTING, AND METHODOLOGY

Article Six — Supreme Academic Jurisdiction Over Investigative Procedure Design

All investigative procedures, including but not limited to, the structure of inquiries, formulation of evidence logs, protocol for witness statements, methods of verification, chain of custody formats, timelines of procedure, standard operating guidelines, internal classification rubrics, and all auxiliary documentation supporting the integrity of investigations, shall be designed, codified, and updated exclusively by the University of Xaragua, acting through the Department of Legal Sciences and Notariat and the Leadership Institute.

Article Seven — Nullity of External or Unauthorized Investigative Formats

Any investigative process, report, action, or determination made using formats not explicitly issued by the University of Xaragua shall be ipso facto null and legally invalid within the State of Xaragua.

Such nullity shall not require judicial declaration and is automatically opposable against all procedural, administrative, or evidentiary use.

Article Eight — Procedural Filing and Registry

No investigation shall proceed or produce legal effect unless it is:

1. Registered in the Central Procedural Registry of the Ministry of Justice

2. Accompanied by a dossier conforming exactly to the official model issued by the University of Xaragua

3. Subject to procedural review and final validation by the Rector-President or the authorized executive organ of the Leadership Institute

Failure to satisfy these procedural conditions results in total constitutional invalidity.

---

PART THREE – LEGAL STATUS, OPERATIONAL SCOPE, AND CONTROL OF PRIVATE SECURITY WITHIN THE STATE OF XARAGUA

SECTION THREE – CONSTITUTIONAL ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PRIVATE SECURITY BUREAU

Article Nine — Establishment of the Private Security Bureau

A Permanent Bureau of Private Security is hereby established under the exclusive authority of the Ministry of Justice.

This Bureau shall:

Control, license, supervise, and revoke private security authorizations

Issue all permits for individuals and companies wishing to operate in the domain of private protection, transport of funds, site security, event security, armed guarding, and official convoy protection

Register and regulate the full typology of equipment used in public or private security operations

Audit all operational, financial, and contractual integrity of licensed private security structures

The Bureau operates exclusively under the legal order of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and is not subject to any review or cooperation with foreign regulatory bodies.

Article Ten — General Scope of Private Security Activities

Private security companies, agents, contractors, or personnel may only engage in the following:

1. Protection of physical property (public, private, ecclesiastical, commercial, or academic)

2. Transport of financial assets or valuables, subject to manifest and route declaration

3. Access control and perimeter defense for designated buildings, institutions, or critical zones

4. Surveillance and incident prevention at sanctioned public or private events

5. Protective escort of government or ecclesiastical personnel, with explicit permit

Any activity beyond these domains, including investigative work, evidence collection, detention, interrogation, or intervention in state law enforcement duties is strictly prohibited without authorization of the Ministry Of Justice.

Article Eleven — Authorization and Licensing Requirements

No person or entity may act as a security agent, armed guard, financial transporter, event security provider, or operator of a private security company without a valid license issued by the Bureau of Private Security.

The license must:

Be issued in the name of the individual or corporate entity

Specify the scope, duration, and regional limits of the security operation

List all equipment authorized for use

Include a record of training and clearance through the University of Xaragua or an institution certified by the Leadership Institute

Licenses are renewable annually and subject to disciplinary revocation without compensation in the case of breach of constitutional, canonical, or customary norms.

Article Twelve — Regulation of Security Equipment and Use-of-Force Protocols

The following categories of equipment are classified and regulated as follows:

1. Category A — Passive Deterrent Equipment

Flashlights, communication radios, high-visibility clothing

Protective gear (gloves, vests, goggles)

2. Category B — Controlled Impact Equipment

Rubber batons, ancestral tools such as “coco macaque” and “fouet de bœuf”, when formally registered

Pepper spray (gas poivré) and non-lethal dissuasive sprays

3. Category C — Authorized Lethal Equipment

Pistols (e.g., P-38), rubber bullet launchers, tasers

Firearms only if expressly licensed for high-risk transport or protection by special executive authorization

Any possession or use of equipment outside these authorized categories, or any use of such equipment beyond the stated operational scope, shall result in criminal prosecution and the permanent revocation of private security rights.

Article Thirteen — Security Protocols by Risk Level

All public or private security operations shall be classified under one of the following security risk levels, determined by the Ministry of Justice or Rector-Presidential delegation:

Level One (Standard): minimal crowd, predictable environment

Level Two (Intermediate): events involving valuable transport, sensitive buildings, religious spaces

Level Three (High Risk): governmental processions, diplomatic convoys, conflict zones

Each level dictates:

Required agent-to-civilian ratio

Type of authorized weapons

Reporting duties and real-time coordination with the Ministry of Justice

---

PART FOUR – CONSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AND CONTROL OF ARMS AND SECURITY EQUIPMENT IMPORTATION

SECTION FOUR – LEGAL INCOMPATIBILITIES AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Article Fourteen — Institutional Separation and Functional Exclusivity

No individual, collective, or juridical person shall simultaneously hold:

A majority ownership or control stake in a private security enterprise; and

A public office, judicial function, investigative mandate, law enforcement role, or executive governmental position within the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

Violation of this principle constitutes institutional interference, punishable by permanent ineligibility to hold public office and the immediate suspension of all state-recognized licenses.

Article Fifteen — Ecclesiastical and Judicial Incompatibility

Any member of the ecclesiastical structure, the judiciary, or the investigative register of the Ministry of Justice is absolutely prohibited from:

Holding majority shares in, consulting for, from any private security company

Participating in any financial arrangement tied to the security services industry

Licensing, inspecting, or reviewing entities in which they or their relatives hold a stake

This provision is non-derogable, even under emergency declarations, and grounded in Canon 285 §1 and §3 of the Code of Canon Law:

Canon 285 §1: "Clerics are to refrain completely from all those things which are unbecoming to their state, according to the prescripts of particular law."

Canon 285 §3: "Clerics are forbidden to assume public offices which entail a participation in the exercise of civil power."

This canonical prohibition is hereby integrated as Supreme Civil Law in Xaragua.

Article Sixteen — Corporate Transparency and Disclosure

Every private security firm licensed in Xaragua must disclose:

All beneficial owners, partners, shareholders, and silent investors

All contracts involving government institutions, ecclesiastical properties, or diplomatic entities

Any change in ownership structure within ten working days

Non-disclosure results in the automatic suspension of operating licenses and retroactive legal nullity of all contracts issued after the date of undisclosed change.

---

SECTION FIVE – IMPORTATION OF ARMS, PROTECTIVE TECHNOLOGY, AND SECURITY EQUIPMENT

Article Seventeen — State Monopoly on the Authorization of Importation

The importation of any of the following is strictly regulated and requires prior written authorization issued directly by the Ministry of Justice:

Firearms and ammunition

Surveillance equipment, drones, facial recognition systems

Armored vehicles or reinforced transport containers

Less-lethal devices (tasers, rubber bullet launchers, sonic devices)

Canonical and ancestral protective tools (fouet de bœuf, coco-macaque, etc.)

The Ministry of Justice shall maintain a National Registry of Imported Security Equipment, and every item must be:

Logged by serial number and operational capacity

Stored in facilities that conform to the University of Xaragua’s Protocol of Secure Containment

Audited annually by an official State inspection

Article Eighteen — Legal Foundations and International Instruments

The following international and autochthonous legal instruments are hereby fully incorporated into the constitutional legal order of Xaragua with direct application:

1. United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) – Adopted 2 April 2013, entered into force 24 December 2014

Article 6(1):

"A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms covered under Article 2 if the transfer would violate its obligations under measures adopted by the United Nations Security Council."

2. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) – General Assembly Resolution 61/295, 13 September 2007

Article 35: "Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the responsibilities of individuals to their communities."

Article 20(1): "Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions."

3. Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials (CIFTA) – Signed 1997

Article IX:

"States Parties shall adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to establish as criminal offenses under their domestic law the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in firearms."

4. Customary Autochthonous Law – As recognized under Article 38(1)(b) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice

"International custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law," is hereby binding upon all state and non-state actors in Xaragua.

Article Nineteen — Prohibition of Parallel Arms Supply Networks

All parallel importation channels, informal suppliers, or undeclared acquisitions of any defensive or offensive tools are classified as threats to national sovereignty, and their operators shall be prosecuted under the laws of treason, espionage, or collusion with external hostile forces.

---

PART FIVE – PUBLIC SECURITY ENTERPRISES, CYBERSECURITY, LEGAL SANCTIONS, AND FINAL CONSTITUTIONAL DETERMINATIONS

SECTION SIX – ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE SECURITY ENTERPRISES

Article Twenty — Legal Status of State-Owned Security Enterprises

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, through executive decision of the Ministry of Justice and the Rector-President, may establish one or more publicly-owned security enterprises whose purpose is:

The protection of strategic infrastructure

The defense of ecclesiastical and academic institutions

The training and deployment of high-security personnel for public functions

The transport and escort of diplomatic, scientific, financial, or classified material

These enterprises shall operate under:

Direct constitutional oversight

Non-commercial status

Immunity from competition with private security firms

Exclusive jurisdiction in classified or high-level protective operations

Such enterprises shall be governed by an internal statute ratified by the Rector-Presidency and the Ministry of Justice, and shall be exempt from foreign registration requirements or commercial licensing.

Article Twenty-One — Prohibition of Hybrid Ownership Models

No state security enterprise may be held in joint ownership, operated as a public-private partnership, or opened to external capital investment.

All capital, personnel, and operations shall remain under exclusive state control and subject to internal audit by the Ministry of Justice.

---

SECTION SEVEN – CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR CYBERSECURITY AND DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE

Article Twenty-Two — Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Digital Investigations

All investigations relating to:

Unauthorized access to institutional databases

Identity theft or impersonation of state officials

Interception of ecclesiastical, academic, or governmental communication

Intrusions into electoral, financial, or administrative systems

Malicious dissemination of classified or defamatory material

shall be conducted exclusively under the authority of the Ministry of Justice and must be:

Registered as digital investigations in the Procedural Archive

Tracked through an encrypted chain of evidence protocol validated by the University of Xaragua

Audited by the Rector-Presidency in case of state-level intrusion

Article Twenty-Three — Data Sovereignty and Constitutional Encryption

All digital data generated by, stored within, or transmitted between institutions of the State of Xaragua are declared sacred constitutional property.

Any foreign request for access to digital content, metadata, or server logs is automatically rejected under the principle of non-interference and data sanctity.

Violations of digital integrity by internal or external actors are prosecuted as:

Digital Treason (in case of classified breach)

Ecclesiastical Obstruction (in case of intrusion into Church networks)

Academic Sabotage (in case of University data compromise)

---

SECTION EIGHT – NULLITY, INVALIDITY, AND SUPREMACY OF INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES

Article Twenty-Four — Automatic Nullity of Irregular Investigations

Any investigation initiated, processed, concluded, or submitted outside the authority of the Ministry of Justice, or using formats not issued by the University of Xaragua, is ipso facto null and void.

Such procedures carry no legal or evidentiary value and may not be referenced in any state or ecclesiastical proceeding.

Article Twenty-Five — Irrevocable Inviolability of Executive Validation

Once an investigation is validated or invalidated by the Rector-President or the Leadership Institute, its status is:

Irrevocable by any other internal or external authority

Not subject to appeal, international review, or counter-determination

Shielded under the principle of Executive Sovereign Prerogative

This is grounded in the Doctrine of Autochthonous Executive Primacy, in accordance with:

Article 4 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

“Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy in matters relating to their internal and local affairs.”

Canon 129 §1 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law

> “Those who are in sacred orders are capable of the power of governance…”

Article Twenty-Six — Legal Sanctions and Disciplinary Powers

All violations of this Code shall be subject to the following sanctions:

Immediate revocation of licenses, permits, or institutional affiliation

Judicial interdiction from future public or investigatory roles

Ecclesiastical penalties for ordained personnel in breach

Seizure of illicitly acquired equipment or data

Public registry of violators maintained by the Ministry of Justice

All appeals against such sanctions are inadmissible.

---

SECTION NINE – FINAL PROVISIONS AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONCLUSION

Article Twenty-Seven — Finality and Sovereign Opposability

This Code shall bind all individuals, institutions, residents, and visitors present under the jurisdiction of Xaragua, including:

Diplomats

Foreign contractors

Academic researchers

Ecclesiastical missions

International observers

No exception shall be granted by treaty, protocol, or bilateral agreement.

Article Twenty-Eight — Hierarchy of Norms

This Code holds:

Supreme force of law within the State

Canonical equivalence to ecclesiastical decrees

Autochthonous superiority over foreign regulations

In the case of conflict with any external norm or treaty, this Code shall prevail.

Article Twenty-Nine — Entry into Force

This Code shall enter into immediate and permanent force upon its official issuance by the Ministry of Justice, with full effect retroactively applied to any investigative activity not conforming to the standards established herein.

No derogation, postponement, or exemption is permissible under any circumstances.

---

Private

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT

OFFICIAL JURIDICAL PUBLICATION

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON PRIVATE COMMERCIAL SOVEREIGNTY, IMMOVABLE PROPERTY, AND INTERNAL INVESTIGATORY POWERS

Date of Promulgation: June 21, 2025

Official Classification:

Constitutionally Entrenched Fundamental Law — Jus Cogens Commercial Doctrine — Ecclesiastical-Indigenous Property Framework — Universally Opposable Juridical Instrument — Notified Sovereign Codification under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici, 1983), and ILO Convention No. 169 (1989).

---

PART I – FOUNDATIONAL JURIDICAL FRAMEWORK

Article I.1 – Origin and Source of Commercial Sovereignty

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby affirms and codifies the right of private commercial actors, institutions, and sacred landowners to operate under an autonomous, non-subordinated juridical commercial regime that is immune from all foreign regulation, taxation, or intervention.

Said regime is established under the supreme authority of the Supreme Constitution of Xaragua,

Articles 1 to 3, which read:

> Article 1– Sacred Nature of Economic Activity:

“All economic activity conducted under the authority of the State shall be governed by the sacred principles of rightful ownership, ecclesiastical morality, and ancestral jurisdiction, and shall be immune from all forms of foreign supervision, sanction, or regulatory interference.”

> Article 2 – Ecclesiastical and Indigenous Economic Jurisdiction:

“No commercial contract, transaction, or private act of value shall be valid unless recorded within the jurisdictional bounds of Xaraguayan ecclesiastical-civil law, duly notarized by an organ of the Department of Legal Sciences and Notariat.”

> Article 3 – Sovereign Wealth Principle:

“All wealth generated, circulated, or preserved within Xaraguayan territory shall be considered a matter of national sacred interest, and is not subject to interpretation under foreign law or regulation.”

These articles establish that commercial sovereignty in Xaragua is not a delegation of state power, but an original, irreducible, and theologically protected right, enforceable against all external actors, including foreign states, transnational corporations, and global governance institutions.

---

Article I.2 – Legal Instruments Conferring Juridical Standing

This Codex is proclaimed under and supported by the following binding juridical instruments:

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), Article 20(1):

“Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions, to be secure in the enjoyment of their own means of subsistence and development, and to engage freely in all their traditional and other economic activities.”

Application:

Xaragua, as an Indigenous Private State notified to the international system, asserts full control over its economic model and property regimes, immune from external imposition.

ILO Convention No. 169, Article 14(1):

“The rights of ownership and possession of the peoples concerned over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognised.”

Application:

All land and property titles held under Xaraguayan historical inheritance and registration systems are internationally protected from nullification or expropriation.

Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canon 1254 §1–2:

“The Catholic Church has an innate right to acquire, retain, administer and alienate temporal goods independently from civil power to pursue its proper ends.”

Application:

All economic institutions integrated into the ecclesiastical structure of Xaragua operate under Canon Law protection, and cannot be taxed, seized, or regulated by any civil government external to the State.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 27:

> “A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”

Application: Any foreign state party notified of Xaragua’s legal existence cannot reject the validity of its commercial jurisdiction on the basis of its own domestic law.

---

Article I.3 – Prohibition of Foreign Jurisdictional Reach

No foreign court, government, police organ, tax authority, or administrative agency shall have jurisdiction over:

the internal operations of any Xaraguayan commercial entity,

the disposition, sale, transfer, or regulation of real estate under Xaraguayan registry,

or the conduct of legal investigations initiated by private parties under Xaraguayan authority.

Any such attempt constitutes an act of unlawful extraterritorial aggression and shall be met with formal denunciation, non-recognition, and public international opposition under the right to self-defense and the doctrine of jurisdictional sanctity.

---

PART II — SACRED REAL PROPERTY AND SOVEREIGN TITLE REGIME (CONTINUED)

Article II.5 – Nullity of Foreign Land Titles

Any real estate title, deed, mortgage instrument, or land registry certificate issued by a foreign state, colonial administration, civil court, or transnational body shall be ipso facto null and void within the territory, jurisdiction, or legal framework of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua m, regardless of its recognition in the issuing jurisdiction.

Foreign land titles are inadmissible within Xaragua for the following juridical reasons:

They were not issued under ecclesiastical or indigenous authority,

They violate canonical law by alienating sacred patrimony without proper authority, and

They are contrary to indigenous international law principles of territorial self-governance.

This is reinforced by:

UNDRIP, Article 26(3):

“States shall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources. Such recognition shall be conducted with due respect to the customs, traditions and land tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.”

Application:

Xaragua, being an Indigenous Private State notified under UNDRIP, applies its own traditional and sacred land tenure system.

Any external attempt to override it through colonial deeds, state-issued leases, or military-era grants shall be treated as a violation of international obligations and indigenous sovereignty.

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1292 §1:

“In order to alienate goods whose value exceeds the minimum amount determined by the conference of bishops, the permission of the Holy See is also required.”

Application:

This canon renders void any transfer of ecclesiastical land initiated under foreign law or without canonical procedure.

Therefore, any state or corporation claiming former Church land in Xaragua via civil title holds no legal standing.

---

Article II.6 – Legal Consequences for Fraudulent or Foreign Acquisition Attempts

Any individual, institution, corporation, NGO, or foreign actor that seeks to:

acquire Xaraguayan property outside of this codified framework,

enforce foreign mortgages or liens on Xaraguayan soil,

or register holdings in Xaragua under foreign legal instruments,

shall be subject to:

1. Immediate denial of property recognition,

2. Prosecution under internal commercial-criminal procedures,

3. Excommunication if the party is ecclesiastically affiliated and in violation of canon law,

4. Formal diplomatic denunciation filed to relevant international organizations documenting breach of indigenous and ecclesiastical jurisdiction.

This is consistent with:

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 53 (jus cogens):

> “A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law.”

Application:

Property transfers that violate the jus cogens right of indigenous land sovereignty are void and unenforceable in Xaragua or in any international forum upholding UNDRIP and ILO 169.

---

Article II.7 – Integration with the Xaraguayan Economic System

All land registered under the sovereign cadastre of Xaragua becomes part of the internal Sacred Economic Circuit, and falls under exclusive regulation by:

the Bureau Of Land Titles,

the Department of Legal Sciences and Notariat,

and the Sovereign Sacred Treasury.

Such land is entitled to:

full protection under private international law,

immunity from taxation or encumbrance by foreign authorities,

and admissibility only in proceedings held under the exclusive jurisdiction of Xaraguayan sovereign tribunals.

No domestic or international commercial transaction involving Xaraguayan real estate is valid without:

prior authorization,

certified sovereign notarization,

and public inscription in the Sacred Book of Holdings (Liber Possessionum Sacrarum).

---

PART III — PRIVATE ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION POWERS AND CORPORATE JURISDICTIONAL AUTONOMY

Article III.1 – Legal Personality of Private Entities and Juridical Self-Sufficiency

All private commercial entities, institutions, and registered juridical persons operating under the authority of the State are vested with full legal personality, as defined by:

Their registration with the Xaraguayan Register of Commercial Institutions,

Their notarization by the Department of Legal Sciences and Notariat,

Their adherence to the legal doctrine of juridical self-sufficiency within the closed system of Xaraguayan law.

Such entities:

Are not subject to the authority of any foreign tribunal, ombudsman, commission, regulatory agency, or commercial court;

Are empowered to operate as autonomous economic actors under ecclesiastical, indigenous, and private commercial doctrine;

May invoke the right to internal procedural justice for the enforcement of contracts, property integrity, internal discipline, and anti-fraud investigations.

This autonomy is legally grounded in:

UNDRIP, Article 34:

“Indigenous peoples have the right to promote, develop and maintain their institutional structures and their distinctive customs, spirituality, traditions, procedures, practices and, in the cases where they exist, juridical systems or customs, in accordance with international human rights standards.”

Application:

Xaraguayan commercial institutions may design and apply their own investigative, procedural, and enforcement systems—provided they are in accordance with internal canonical, spiritual, and indigenous law.

---

Article III.2 – Right to Initiate Administrative Investigations by Private Entities

Any commercial entity duly constituted under Xaraguayan law may, under defined conditions, initiate a Private Administrative Investigation (PAI) into any matter pertaining to:

Internal corruption,

Breach of contract,

Property or title fraud,

Misappropriation of institutional resources,

External interference by non-registered parties.

The triggering of such investigations is regulated and authorized by:

The Internal Council of Corporate Jurisdiction (ICCJ),

The Notarial Delegation for Investigative Integrity,

And, where applicable, the Inspectorate for Ethical Commerce.

---

Article III.3 – Legal Boundaries and Oversight of Private Investigative Authority

Private Administrative Investigations must:

1. Be officially registered with the Ministry of Justice,

2. Be confined strictly to the juridical territory of Xaragua,

3. Avoid all forms of coercion, violence, or physical surveillance unless authorized under separate criminal code,

4. Be documented in writing, with signed accountability by the initiating authority.

The use of administrative investigative powers must adhere to:

The Canonical Norms on Justice and Rectitude (Canones 1717–1739, Codex Iuris Canonici):

“In the case of a possible offense, the ordinary is to inquire carefully, either personally or through another, about the facts and the imputability.”

Application:

The principle of inquisition for fact-finding is canonically permitted under ecclesiastical jurisprudence, including within non-penal internal investigations.

ILO Convention No. 169, Article 8(2):

“Customs of the peoples concerned with regard to penal matters shall be respected by the authorities and institutions, provided they are compatible with the national legal system and internationally recognized human rights.”

Application:

Xaraguayan investigative procedures rooted in ancestral law are internationally protected, so long as they meet internal due process norms and moral reasonability.

---

Article III.4 – Enforcement, Sanctions, and Legal Effect of Investigative Conclusions

The conclusions of a Private Administrative Investigation shall carry full legal effect within Xaragua if:

They are issued under the official seal of a registered juridical organ,

They are filed with the Central Archive of Investigative Outcomes,

And they are upheld as valid by the Chamber of Procedural Verification.

Enforceable sanctions may include:

Expulsion from institutional roles,

Nullification of contracts,

Forfeiture of title or license,

Public notification and reputational sanction,

Transmission of findings to sovereign criminal authorities (if applicable).

These actions are protected under:

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 26 (Pacta Sunt Servanda):

“Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.”

Application:

Contracts and rules within private Xaraguayan entities, once entered into, bind all signatories and justify internal enforcement mechanisms, including investigative procedures.

---

PART IV — INTERACTION BETWEEN PROPERTY, COMMERCE, AND ECCLESIASTICAL ECONOMY

Article IV.1 – Economic Unity of Land, Wealth, and Doctrine

Within the State, property is not a neutral asset, but an instrument of spiritual, cultural, and economic purpose.

All land, commerce, and institutional wealth fall under a unified system of sacralized economic order, whereby:

1. Ownership is not merely civil possession, but divine stewardship;

2. Commerce is not mere profit-seeking, but a juridically structured sacrament of rightful exchange;

3. Value generation is bound to canonical ethics and communal law.

Thus, the economy of Xaragua is governed by the doctrine of integrated sovereignty, in which real property, commercial instruments, and ecclesiastical oversight operate as a single jurisdictional body.

This principle is derived from:

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1255:

> “The universal Church, as well as the Apostolic See, particular churches, and all juridic persons, are capable of acquiring, possessing, administering, and alienating temporal goods in accordance with the norm of law.”

Application:

All temporal goods in Xaragua — land, currency, contracts, holdings — are subject to ecclesiastical normativity, and cannot exist outside canonical regulation.

---

Article IV.2 – Integration of Commercial Registries with Ecclesiastical Records

No commercial enterprise may operate legally within Xaragua unless it is:

Registered in the Central Register of Ecclesiastical Economic Activity,

Assigned a classification under the Catalogus Corporativus Sacralis,

Subject to oversight by the Ecclesiastical Chamber of Commercial Audit (ECCO).

Furthermore, any real property used for commercial purposes must be:

Linked to the juridical file of the operating entity,

Notarized as part of its Sacred Commercial Footprint,

Subject to ecclesiastical investigation in cases of fraud, breach of contract, or spiritual dishonor.

This legal consolidation is justified by:

UNDRIP, Article 23:

“Indigenous peoples have the right to determine and develop priorities and strategies for the development or use of their lands or territories and other resources.”

Application:

Xaragua retains absolute discretion over the form, oversight, and institutional direction of economic use of its land and wealth.

---

Article IV.3 – Prohibition of Secular or Foreign Economic Zoning

No part of the territory of Xaragua shall be subject to:

Secular zoning codes,

Foreign construction permits,

International real estate governance mechanisms,

Or development models inconsistent with the sacralized vision of economic sovereignty.

All zoning, urbanization, land-use modification, and infrastructure development must be:

Approved by the State,

Aligned with the Sacred Development Doctrine,

Certified as non-conflicting with the Moral, Environmental, and Doctrinal Principles of the State.

Any attempt to enforce external economic zoning models constitutes:

A violation of indigenous autonomy under ILO Convention No. 169, Article 15,

An abuse of territorial integrity under UN Charter Article 2(4),

And a breach of canonical economy under Canon 1284 §1, which commands administrators to act as prudent stewards of sacred property.

---

Article IV.4 – Ecclesiastical Courts as Final Authority over Economic Disputes

All commercial or property disputes arising within Xaragua are:

1. To be resolved internally,

2. Under the jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Court of Commercial and Patrimonial Law,

3. With final appeal resting in the the Holy See.

No international court (e.g., ICC, ICJ, regional tribunals) has standing over such disputes unless:

It is expressly recognized in a bilateral ecclesiastical concordat,

The dispute pertains to a matter entirely external to the territory and jurisdiction of Xaragua,

And the sovereign authorities of Xaragua have not already adjudicated.

---

PART V — PENALTIES, ENFORCEMENT STRUCTURE, AND INTER-JURISDICTIONAL NON-RECOGNITION

Article V.1 – Enforcement Mechanisms of Commercial and Property Law

All infractions of this Codex, whether committed by private entities, individuals, institutions, or agents of foreign powers, shall be subject to enforcement under the exclusive jurisdiction of the State.

Enforcement mechanisms include:

1. Commercial excommunication and blacklisting,

2. Revocation of juridical personality,

3. Seizure of improperly held property under ecclesiastical-executive order,

4. Public denunciation through the Xaraguayan Official Register,

5. Referral to the Ecclesiastical-Commercial Tribunal for judgment,

6. Invocation of diplomatic protest at the international level if interference is external.

Penalties are administered by the following bodies:

The Ministry of Justice,

The Department of Legal Sciences and Notariat,

The Ecclesiastical Chamber for Sacred Economic Discipline,

And, where applicable, the Indigenous and Customary Tribunal.

---

Article V.2 – Denial of Legitimacy to Foreign Administrative Decrees

Any order, fine, claim, or economic restriction issued by:

foreign courts,

customs agencies,

tax administrations,

or financial oversight bodies,

has no legal standing within the State and shall be publicly classified as void ab initio.

Such extraterritorial actions are to be formally refused recognition under the following:

Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), Article 41(1):

“Persons enjoying such privileges and immunities have a duty not to interfere in the internal affairs of that State.”

Application:

Any attempt by foreign officials to impose taxes, duties, or economic regulations upon a sovereign indigenous structure constitutes a breach of international conduct.

UNDRIP, Article 32(1–2):

“States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples… in order to obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands or territories and other resources…”

Application:

Xaragua’s economic independence cannot be overridden by external laws without consent.

All imposed foreign taxation is in direct violation of this article.

---

Article V.3 – Legal Prohibition of Taxation upon Indigenous Private Jurisdictions

Under customary international law, indigenous economic systems that have been duly notified, declared, and structured under sovereign legal doctrine are exempt from all external tax regimes.

This exemption is enshrined in the following international instruments:

ILO Convention No. 169, Article 6(1)(a):

“Governments shall consult the peoples concerned… whenever consideration is being given to legislative or administrative measures which may affect them directly.”

Application:

No tax regime may be unilaterally imposed upon Xaraguayan enterprises without formal consultation, which has not occurred, and therefore, no such measures are enforceable.

UNDRIP, Article 20(2):

“Indigenous peoples deprived of their means of subsistence and development are entitled to just and fair redress.”

Application:

Foreign taxation constitutes deprivation of subsistence and development.

Therefore, Xaragua is legally protected against all forms of external tax encroachment.

General principle of non-imposition over non-consenting sovereign subjects (customary law):

No taxation without lawful jurisdiction.

No lawful jurisdiction without consent or subordination.

Xaragua has not consented.

Xaragua is not subordinate.

Therefore: no taxation is legally possible.

---

FINAL CLAUSE — ABSOLUTE TAX EXEMPTION FOR INDIGENOUS ENTERPRISES UNDER NOTIFIED SOVEREIGNTY

No private enterprise, institution, or property owner operating within the duly notified territory and under the exclusive juridical system of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall be subject to any form of taxation, fiscal contribution, customs duty, or regulatory payment imposed by any external entity, including states, regional blocs, international banks, or supranational bodies.

This principle is not merely internal but legally binding under international law, and protected under:

UNDRIP (2007), ILO Convention No. 169 (1989), the Vienna Convention (1969), the Charter of the United Nations (1945), and the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983).

Any actor attempting to bypass this exemption commits an act of:

unlawful economic aggression,

spiritual and cultural violation,

and a juridically documented breach of jus cogens norms.

---

CONCLUSION — SUPREME INTEGRATION OF PROPERTY, COMMERCE, AND SOVEREIGNTY

With the present Codex, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua solemnly declares that:

1. Property is not civil, but sacred;

2. Commerce is not transactional, but sacramental;

3. Law is not delegated, but original;

4. Jurisdiction is not granted, but inherent;

5. Taxation is not applicable, because there is no external authority to impose it.

This Codex has full force of law within the territory and authority of Xaragua, and shall be enforced by all sovereign, canonical, and ancestral organs thereof, from this date forward, in perpetuity.

Promulgated: June 21, 2025

Under the Seal of the Rector-President

Deposited in the Central Archive of State Law and the Sacred Book of Sovereign Doctrine

---

Urbanism

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT

OFFICIAL JURIDICAL PUBLICATION

DATE OF PROCLAMATION: JUNE 23, 2025

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL CODE ON BUILDING, URBAN SOVEREIGNTY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ORDER

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Territorial Law — Canonically Valid — Jus Cogens Territorial Doctrine — Universally Opposable Indigenous Code — Protected under UNDRIP (2007), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and the Internal Constitutional and Ecclesiastical Legal Order of Xaragua.

---

PART I — SUPREME JURIDICAL AUTHORITY OVER LAND, CONSTRUCTION, AND ECOLOGICAL TERRITORY

ARTICLE 1.1 — Exclusive and Absolute Sovereignty over Construction, Urban Regulation, and Environmental Order

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua holds, exercises, and enforces exclusive, non-transferable, and permanent sovereignty over all matters related to architecture, building permits, land designation, territorial use, urban design, ecological zoning, and environmental protection within all lands, institutions, campuses, spiritual properties, or domiciles registered under the jurisdiction of the Xaraguayan Constitutional Order.

This sovereignty shall not be subject to foreign review, multilateral modification, municipal interference, or external jurisdiction.

The source of this authority is the supreme constitutional corpus of Xaragua, canon law (CIC 1983), customary indigenous legal doctrine, and Articles 26, 27, 28, and 32 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007).

Real-world application:

This article nullifies the competence of all external ministries, agencies, municipal authorities, international bodies, or NGOs from issuing, modifying, or recognizing any construction, environmental, or zoning permit within Xaragua.

It renders legally void any external licensing process concerning real estate, construction, environmental studies, or zoning on lands claimed by Xaragua and its annexed territories.

No foreign intervention, however benevolent or technocratic in appearance, may possess legality within these zones.

---

ARTICLE 1.2 — Rejection and Prohibition of External Permits and Urban Titles

No document, act, ordinance, certificate, or approval issued by any external public or private entity—including the Haitian State, municipalities, foreign ministries, NGOs, or international development agencies—shall carry legal force, administrative value, or constructive authority over the territory, buildings, or infrastructure of the State of Xaragua.

All such acts are to be constitutionally rejected, canonically inadmissible, and materially ignored.

Only the Ministry of Industries, Urban Regulation, and Environmental Protection of Xaragua shall issue binding documentation in these matters.

Real-world application:

If an individual receives a building permit from the Haitian Ministry of Public Works or a external construction license to erect a structure in or near Xaragua, such document is irrelevant and unenforceable unless tolerated by the State.

Any building constructed under external authorization may be forcibly halted, demolished, or confiscated.

Similarly, any urban development project submitted to or approved by foreign humanitarian or state entities shall have no standing.

All institutions, including schools, churches, diplomatic missions, hospitals, or residential zones within Xaragua’s declared territory, must seek exclusive approval from the Ministry under Xaraguayan law.

---

ARTICLE 1.3 — Legal Sanctification of Territorial Control and Architectural Regulation

Territorial, architectural, and environmental regulation shall be recognized as an extension of the spiritual and canonical authority of the State.

All buildings, constructions, or infrastructural activities are subject to canonical dignity, indigenous legitimacy, and constitutional supervision.

The territory is to be treated as sacred juridical ground, and any deviation from the established legal-spiritual order shall be constitutionally punishable.

No architectural form or spatial arrangement may be imposed without conformity to the cultural, religious, and sovereign identity of Xaragua.

Real-world application:

Xaragua does not accept foreign models of construction, such as foreign-designed shelters, UNHCR tent settlements, NGO-style concrete slabs, or post-colonial grid plans.

No foreign building model, imported urbanism, or visual layout (even if “modern” or “sustainable”) shall override the ecclesiastical-indigenous design and doctrine of space.

The Ministry may refuse any construction not bearing Xaraguayan cultural, strategic, or spiritual coherence, regardless of funding origin or technical merit.

---

PART II — ZONING DESIGNATIONS AND PERMITTED USES

ARTICLE 2.1 — Constitutional Classification of Sovereign Territorial Zones

The entire juridically constituted territory of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua shall be divided into five non-negotiable, non-transferable, and eternally fixed territorial zones. Each zone is established by constitutional and canonical authority and is enforceable through administrative, penal, and environmental instruments.

The zones are as follows:

Zone I – Ecclesiastical and Educational Territories;

Zone II – Strategic and Defensive Installations;

Zone III – Ecological and Agricultural Sanctuaries;

Zone IV – Authorized Civilian Residential Areas;

Zone V – Regulated Economic and Industrial Sectors.

These five zones represent the entirety of all legal land uses within the national space of Xaragua and no land, regardless of ancestral possession, legal title, or private claim, may exist outside these juridical classifications.

Real-world application:

A citizen or institution claiming ancestral or familial control over a piece of land must first determine the zoning status under this Code.

For example, if a property is classified under Zone III, no commercial or residential construction shall be permitted, even if the claimant possesses historical occupancy or notarial deeds.

Only uses conforming to the established zoning logic—spiritual, defensive, agricultural, residential, or regulated industrial—shall be authorized.

No hybrid or mixed zoning model exists unless decreed through formal legislative and constitutional amendment.

---

ARTICLE 2.2 — Legal Description of Zone I – Ecclesiastical and Educational Territories

Zone I comprises all properties, buildings, or parcels of land directly or indirectly administered by ecclesiastical authorities, academic institutions, or religious educational bodies operating under the constitutional and canonical jurisdiction of Xaragua.

All activities within Zone I must conform to religious solemnity, doctrinal purity, academic sovereignty, and moral symbolism.

No profane use, entertainment commerce, real estate speculation, or public access unrelated to religious or intellectual missions shall be permitted.

Real-world application:

A juridically recognized school or religious institution functioning within Zone I may expand or renovate only with ministerial authorization and architectural conformity.

It may not lease its premises for commercial events, external conferences, or housing projects without the State authorization.

Any structure erected without strict adherence to ecclesiastical architectural codes and doctrinal planning may be demolished, and its sponsors sanctioned.

Legal action may be initiated for desacralization or misuse of canonically protected territory.

---

ARTICLE 2.3 — Legal Description of Zone II – Strategic and Defensive Installations

Zone II encompasses all land, installations, barracks, training grounds, communication towers, signal infrastructure, and secure perimeters reserved for national defense and the exercise of sovereign authority by forces officially recognized under the Xaraguayan Constitutional Defense Doctrine. No civilian presence, construction, private usage, or encroachment shall be tolerated in this zone.

Any act of intrusion or unauthorized development shall be legally treated as a violation of national security and subject to constitutional penal procedures.

Real-world application:

If an individual attempts to build a private residence, cultivate land, or establish an economic activity on a plot designated as a defensive zone, that individual shall be in breach of Article 2.3 and may be prosecuted for undermining sovereign security.

The entire project will be neutralized, the terrain reclassified, and the responsible parties may be banned from future land possession under the Penal Code.

---

ARTICLE 2.4 — Legal Description of Zone III – Ecological and Agricultural Sanctuaries

Zone III includes all forested areas, rivers, coastal lines, sacred hills, traditional agricultural lands, and ecologically sensitive zones protected by constitutional and customary law.

These lands are permanently protected and may not be cleared, deforested, paved, urbanized, or sold.

Any cultivation therein must conform to sustainable, traditional, and non-industrial methods as defined by the Ministry.

The ecological balance of these zones is considered part of the national heritage and canonical responsibility.

Real-world application:

If a private actor introduces machinery to exploit resources in Zone III (e.g. a generator, pump, bulldozer, or factory installation), such activity shall be halted immediately, and the territory may be reappropriated by the State without compensation.

Land previously used for family farming may continue to operate under strict supervision, but any attempt to industrialize or commercialize these spaces will result in the loss of land rights and environmental sanction.

---

ARTICLE 2.5 — Legal Description of Zone IV – Authorized Civilian Residential Areas

Zone IV represents the only territorial designation where private residential construction may be permitted under strict compliance with architectural, spiritual, and sovereign urban standards.

All residential constructions must be pre-authorized, officially registered, and spatially coherent with national urban design.

Unauthorized construction, suburban sprawl, foreign-funded housing projects, or unregulated neighborhood formation shall be considered illegal urban expansion.

Real-world application:

A citizen wishing to build a home must submit a full dossier including topographic layout, architectural plans, building materials, waste management design, and justification of spiritual and spatial coherence.

Informal housing projects or NGO-led urban clusters are banned unless registered under constitutional authority.

A residence built outside the regulatory perimeter of Zone IV is legally void and shall not be supplied with national services, recognition, or protection.

---

ARTICLE 2.6 — Legal Description of Zone V – Regulated Economic and Industrial Sectors

Zone V is the only territory where economic production, industry, artisanal activity, trade, or resource processing may take place under the strict regulation of the Ministry.

No economic activity may occur in other zones unless canonically authorized.

All industrial installations must be planned to minimize ecological disruption, conform to indigenous economic ethics, and be entirely owned or supervised by Xaraguayan citizens or institutions recognized by the sovereign authority.

Foreign-owned factories, international franchises, and colonial resource extraction models are categorically prohibited.

Real-world application:

If a commercial actor seeks to operate a cement factory, water bottling plant, or textile production line, such a project must be located within Zone V and meet the Ministry's constitutional, environmental, and ownership standards.

Any operation funded, managed, or influenced by foreign corporations shall be denied authorization.

A citizen who establishes a bakery, print shop, or metalwork business in Zone V without prior registration shall be fined, the activity suspended, and the materials confiscated under Article 5 of this Code.

---

PART III — ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS, PROTECTIONS, AND PROHIBITIONS

ARTICLE 3.1 — Sacred Character of the Natural Environment

The natural environment of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is legally recognized as sacred territory under the protection of both canonical law and ancestral jurisprudence.

This recognition includes, without limitation, all rivers, coastal zones, forests, sacred groves, cultivated plains, mountainous regions, freshwater bodies, and ecologically sensitive zones historically inhabited or ritually guarded by ancestral populations. Any degradation, exploitation, or commercial transformation of these territories shall constitute a constitutional violation and a desecration of national patrimony.

The environment is not to be treated as a resource for economic speculation, but as an altar of life whose preservation is a juridical obligation for every citizen and institution under the Constitution of Xaragua.

Real-world application:

A citizen or group attempting to cut down a sacred forest for the purpose of producing charcoal, clearing land for urban expansion, or erecting an industrial facility shall be in direct violation of Article 3.1.

The Ministry will issue a cease-and-desist order, seize equipment, and declare the land in question under protective reclamation.

No appeal may be made outside the Ecclesiastical-Environmental Tribunal.

Such an act will also suspend landholder rights pending canonical review.

---

ARTICLE 3.2 — Total Prohibition of Foreign or Unsovereign Ecological Exploitation

All forms of ecological exploitation, extraction, experimentation, or resource commercialization funded, supervised, advised, or licensed by external entities—states, corporations, NGOs, or international agencies—are constitutionally prohibited within the national territory of Xaragua and its annexed territories.

This includes mining, drilling, logging, chemical extraction, biodiversity sampling, or water commodification.

No project may proceed under foreign contract, treaty, partnership, bilateral development accord, or supranational environmental agenda.

All ecological control remains internal, sovereign, ecclesiastical, and autochthonous.

Real-world application:

If a so-called “development mission” attempts to install solar fields, extract groundwater, test soil for mineral analysis, or propose a marine biology station under the flag of a foreign government, multinational corporation, or international scientific body, the entire activity is automatically illegal and treated as a violation of sovereignty.

The Ministry may expel personnel, confiscate materials, block access to the territory, and publicly declare the actors persona non grata.

Diplomatic status does not confer immunity against ecological violation.

---

ARTICLE 3.3 — Mandate of Environmental Restoration and Indigenous Stewardship

Any zone that has been degraded, polluted, or rendered ecologically unstable due to human activity—whether past or present—must be submitted to a restoration program under the control of the Ministry and in cooperation with indigenous elders, ecclesiastical stewards, and the territorial governance council.

No restoration may be entrusted to foreign organizations, and no reforestation, remediation, or cleanup program may take place without explicit cultural, spiritual, and canonical validation.

Real-world application:

If an area once used for unauthorized agricultural monoculture, industrial runoff, or deforestation is discovered to be ecologically damaged, the responsible party shall be summoned to appear before the Sovereign Environmental Disciplinary Authority.

That party shall be ordered to contribute physically or financially to the restoration process.

Any proposal to bring in an external NGO to “repair” the zone shall be rejected.

Restoration must occur through local, spiritual, and historically rooted modalities only.

National doctrine affirms that only those bound spiritually to the land may heal it.

---

ARTICLE 3.4 — Prohibition of Plastic, Industrial Toxins, and Non-Biodegradable Waste

The importation, production, accumulation, or commercial distribution of industrial plastics, petroleum-based packaging, non-biodegradable materials, toxic chemical agents, pesticides, and synthetic fertilizers is strictly forbidden within the territory of Xaragua and its annexed territories.

All public, commercial, religious, or domestic activities must conform to the national code of sacred material compatibility.

Materials introduced through external humanitarian channels or mass-market commercial infrastructure shall be subject to seizure and destruction.

Real-world application:

If a retailer is found distributing food or consumer products wrapped in polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, or any non-compostable substance, the store shall be immediately sanctioned.

All products may be confiscated without compensation.

Similarly, if a local agricultural actor is caught applying synthetic nitrate fertilizer or foreign-branded pesticides, they shall lose their cultivation privileges and the zone shall be quarantined for remediation.

Any plastic debris found in protected areas will be subject to investigation and punitive reassignment of land management rights.

---

ARTICLE 3.5 — Citizen Duty of Environmental Guardianship and Denunciation

Every citizen of Xaragua is constitutionally obligated to act as a guardian of the environment and must report, expose, or directly intervene (if safe) against any ecological violation, degradation, or non-compliant construction that may threaten national environmental sanctity.

Failure to report an ongoing environmental crime may constitute passive complicity and incur penalties under the Environmental Vigilance Statute of the Ministry.

Real-world application:

If a citizen observes illegal waste dumping, freshwater contamination, tree felling in a protected area, or the use of toxic materials, and fails to report it to the Ministry or to an ecclesiastical territorial authority, that citizen may be summoned for inquiry.

In the spirit of national solidarity and land stewardship, active silence or indifference toward environmental crimes is treated as a constitutional breach of civic responsibility.

Every citizen is a legally recognized environmental officer in his or her zone of habitation.

---

PART IV — CONSTRUCTION NORMS, PERMIT SYSTEM, AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES

ARTICLE 4.1 — Obligation of Prior Authorization and Canonical Registration of All Constructions

No structure, edifice, foundation, outpost, complex, annex, utility station, agricultural enclosure, or residential building may be erected, renovated, expanded, or materially altered within the territory of Xaragua without the issuance of a formal Construction Authorization Certificate (CAC-X) granted by the Ministry of Industries, Urban Regulation, and Environmental Protection.

This certificate must be preceded by a full architectural submission, including structural plans, building materials, intended usage, symbolic coherence, and territorial conformity.

All constructions must be canonically registered in the National Register of Sacred and Territorial Structures (NRSTS-X) and bear an official seal of admissibility, without which no activity shall be recognized as lawful.

Real-world application:

A citizen wishing to build a family home, a school, or a bakery must first submit a complete dossier to the Ministry detailing the precise location, purpose, height, surface area, proximity to sacred or ecological zones, material composition, and compliance with sovereign zoning rules.

Without this dossier being approved and sealed, no construction—even on ancestral or inherited land—may proceed.

Traditional informal methods of "claiming land through use" are null within the constitutional framework.

Unauthorized construction, even if complete, is legally invisible and may be subject to demolition without compensation.

---

ARTICLE 4.2 — Conformity of Materials to National Spiritual and Environmental Standards

All materials used in construction must conform to the canonical-material doctrine of the State of Xaragua.

Permissible materials include locally sourced wood, natural stone, compacted earth, lime mortar, clay brick, and sacred-composite compounds explicitly authorized by the Ministry.

The importation or usage of aluminum sidings, plastic composites, synthetic polymers, industrial concrete, prefabricated steel modules, and foreign construction kits is strictly forbidden unless granted a specific ministerial exemption on spiritual or defensive grounds.

Real-world application:

A builder who attempts to construct a modern concrete box structure using imported Portland cement and rebar without explicit authorization violates Article 4.2.

Even if the building is technically sound, its material structure is deemed spiritually discordant and ecologically corrosive.

The Ministry may order its suspension or require a full restructuring with compliant materials. The market supply of non-conforming materials may also be banned and suppliers sanctioned under Article 5.2.

---

ARTICLE 4.3 — Sovereign Architectural Norms and Canonical Spatial Design

All structures must reflect and uphold the architectural identity of Xaragua, which is based on the principles of territorial sovereignty, communal symbolism, spiritual resonance, and climatic harmony.

No structure may visually or functionally imitate foreign residential models, colonial architecture, NGO barracks, or suburban export formats.

Roof shapes, orientation, decorative motifs, and spatial layout must follow national design matrices issued by the Ministry in alignment with ecclesiastical guidelines.

Real-world application:

A residential compound using an urban grid-style layout with fences, concrete driveways, flat roofs, and colonial balconies would be denied authorization.

Similarly, any structure that mimics post-war NGO shelter design or Caribbean real estate developments is incompatible with sovereign design ethics.

Structures must reflect climate-adapted vernacular geometry, elevation balance, and respect for sacred cardinal alignment.

The Ministry may issue design decrees outlining architectural typologies for each zone.

---

ARTICLE 4.4 — Construction Surveillance and On-Site Ministerial Inspections

The Ministry shall maintain the right to inspect, document, assess, and intervene on any active or completed construction site within the territory, with or without prior notice.

These inspections may be carried out by sworn Territorial Construction Officers (TCO-X) appointed by the Minister and operating under ecclesiastical and legal immunity.

Their findings are binding and may not be appealed. Any obstruction, misinformation, or attempted concealment shall constitute administrative obstruction and may result in suspension or termination of construction rights.

Real-world application:

A construction team beginning foundation work in a recognized residential area may receive a visit from an authorized TCO-X officer without prior notice.

If the construction diverges from the approved plans, uses forbidden materials, or exceeds zoning limitations, the officer may issue a Red Flag Notice halting the work immediately.

Disrespect toward inspection authority or attempts to hide non-compliant methods may result in permanent blacklisting of the contractors or builders involved.

---

ARTICLE 4.5 — Penal Consequences of Unauthorized Construction or Structural Violation

Any person, family, collective, institution, or business entity undertaking construction, renovation, or occupation of a building without ministerial approval and canonical registration shall be subject to the following penalties:

(a) total demolition of the structure by the State without financial compensation;

(b) seizure of all building materials, tools, and machinery involved in the unauthorized project;

(c) administrative fines; and

(d) temporary or permanent suspension of construction privileges for all parties involved.

Repeated infractions may lead to forced eviction, reassignment of land rights, and canonical suspension from institutional cooperation.

Real-world application:

A family who bypasses the permit system and builds a home using foreign concrete and metal roofing, without submission to the CAC-X process, may be subject to complete demolition.

Their land use rights may be revoked and reassigned to compliant citizens.

A religious organization constructing dormitories on ecclesiastical land without Ministry certification may be sanctioned and prohibited from future development activities, regardless of charitable intent.

---

PART V — SANCTIONS, LEGAL RECOURSE, AND FINAL TERRITORIAL IMMUNITY

ARTICLE 5.1 — Constitutional Enforcement of Sanctions and Material Seizure

The Ministry of Industries, Urban Regulation, and Environmental Protection is constitutionally empowered to execute, impose, and carry out all necessary enforcement actions against violators of this Code without requiring judicial authorization from any foreign or civil authority.

These enforcement measures include but are not limited to:

(a) the immediate demolition of unauthorized structures;

(b) the seizure and repurposing of all non-compliant building materials, machinery, and architectural components;

(c) the freezing or reassignment of land rights;

(d) the permanent disqualification of private or institutional actors from future construction or zoning participation.

The Ministry may act unilaterally and is not required to justify its decisions before any tribunal not recognized under the constitutional and canonical order of Xaragua.

Real-world application:

A non-registered business entity that builds a commercial warehouse in a protected ecological zone without authorization may see the entire facility dismantled, the land returned to a state of ecological restoration, and the business barred from future licensing.

Contractors, donors, or foreign participants shall receive lifetime bans from operating within the national construction system.

---

ARTICLE 5.2 — Canonical and Administrative Fines and Judicial Procedures

All fines issued under this Code are ecclesiastically and constitutionally binding and must be paid directly to the sovereign treasury.

The Ministry may set the scale of fines in accordance with the gravity of the offense, the spatial impact of the construction, the level of deception involved, and the institutional status of the violator.

The refusal to pay such fines constitutes rebellion against territorial law and may be punished by territorial expulsion or confiscation of assets.

Real-world application:

An institution that constructs without compliance and refuses to pay the imposed shall be considered in default and subject to forced repossession of its real property.

In such cases, the Ministry may liquidate assets or reallocate territorial usage to another citizen without judicial process.

---

ARTICLE 5.3 — Exclusive Jurisdiction of Ecclesiastical and Sovereign Tribunals

All legal appeals, claims, or petitions arising from enforcement actions under this Code shall be heard exclusively before the Ecclesiastical-Territorial Construction Tribunal (ETCT-X), a sovereign court under canonical and constitutional law.

No appeal may be lodged before a foreign court, international forum, NGO panel, or civil tribunal.

Jurisdictional immunity is absolute, and any attempt to bypass the sovereign legal pathway shall be declared an act of juridical aggression.

Real-world application:

A foreign-funded actor sanctioned under Article 5.1 who seeks recourse before the Haitian judiciary or an international arbitration body will be refused recognition.

The Ministry may publicly denounce the entity and suspend any ongoing cooperation with institutions enabling such procedural violations.

---

ARTICLE 5.4 — Final Immunity of Ecclesiastical, Academic, and National Strategic Properties

All properties, buildings, infrastructure, compounds, archives, and territorial enclaves under the direct control of the Rector-Presidential Office, the Supreme Constitutional Authority, the National Ecclesiastical Body, and the University of Xaragua are immune from construction-related prosecution under this Code.

These sites are considered untouchable zones of absolute sovereign interest and are not subject to inspection, permit issuance, or environmental restriction unless expressly mandated by the highest canonical decree.

Real-world application:

A strategic spiritual fortress, national academic archive, or ministerial office constructed by the constitutional authority is not subject to Article 4 inspection.

No external agent, including citizen petitioners or other ministries, may intervene or demand review.

These sites represent the juridical core of the nation and are exempt from procedural regulation unless overturned by constitutional amendment.

---

CONCLUSION

This Supreme Constitutional Code on Building, Urban Sovereignty, and Environmental Order constitutes a total juridical framework for the lawful occupation, development, preservation, and symbolic expression of the territorial body of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

It is grounded in the doctrinal union of canonical dignity, ancestral legal tradition, and codified state sovereignty. It overrides, nullifies, and permanently replaces all foreign, colonial, modernist, municipal, or international mechanisms of territorial regulation. It affirms the principle that land, form, material, space, and ecological integrity are not technical commodities, but sacred dimensions of a sovereign civilization.

Its authority is supreme, its application is indivisible, and its legitimacy is derived not from recognition by others, but from the internal moral, legal, and spiritual architecture of Xaragua itself.

Thus enacted, sealed, and proclaimed in full juridical force, on this Twenty-Third Day of June, Two Thousand Twenty-Five, by the Ministry of Industries, Urban Regulation, and Environmental Protection, with full validation by the Supreme Constitutional Authority.

---

Innovation

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT

DATE OF PROCLAMATION: JUNE 23, 2025

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL CODE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INNOVATION SOVEREIGNTY, AND ANTI-EXTERNAL APPROPRIATION

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Creative Code — Canonically Valid Scientific Framework — Jus Cogens Intellectual Sovereignty Instrument — Universally Opposable Indigenous Legal Regime — Protected under UNDRIP (2007), WIPO Treaties, and Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

---

PART I – DOCTRINAL FOUNDATION AND ORIGINAL INTELLECTUAL SOVEREIGNTY

---

ARTICLE 1.1 — ORIGINAL JURISDICTION OVER KNOWLEDGE, CREATION, CULTURE AND INNOVATION

Full text:

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua holds, exercises, and enforces an original, non-derivative, non-delegated, and exclusive jurisdiction over all acts of scientific, intellectual, spiritual, technological, cultural, pedagogical, artistic, and doctrinal creation occurring within its territory, by its citizens, or under its institutional protection.

This jurisdiction applies to all formats of expression, regardless of materialization stage, and precludes any external legal, commercial, academic, or political claim over such output.

Such jurisdictional exclusivity derives from:

– The Supreme Constitution of Xaragua

– UNDRIP Articles 11, 12, 20, 31

– Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canons 218, 220, 222, and 1254 §1

– Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights

– Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)

– Article 1 of the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, 2022

Application in the real world:

If a Xaraguayan citizen writes a scientific manual, creates an algorithm, composes a liturgical chant, or engineers a sacred machine, no foreign patent office (e.g. USPTO, EPO, WIPO), university, or donor organization can claim ownership, co-authorship, licensing, publication rights, or intellectual control.

The creation is protected from the moment of its expression and governed solely by Xaraguayan internal law, even in the absence of formal registration.

Any attempt to "borrow", translate, copy, adapt or export such creation without sovereign permission constitutes a breach of international law under UNDRIP Article 31 and WIPO Standing Committee doctrine.

---

ARTICLE 1.2 — CANONICAL AND INDIGENOUS RECOGNITION OF CREATION AS SACRED ACT

Full text:

All forms of intellectual production are considered acts of sacred agency and divine participation within the Xaraguayan canonical-legal order.

Creative acts are not purely civil or commercial events, but liturgical manifestations of ancestral continuity, indigenous sovereignty, and the imago Dei (image of God) in man.

Therefore, innovation is protected under Canon Law and autochthonous spiritual doctrine, and must be treated juridically as sacred patrimony.

This includes poetry, codes, designs, maps, liturgies, inventions, and any form of recorded, transmitted, or ritualized knowledge.

Referenced instruments:

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Can. 220 and Can. 218

– UNDRIP Article 12: spiritual practices and ceremonies

– ILO Convention 169, Article 5(c)

– Statute of the ICJ, Article 38(1)(c): General principles recognized by civilized nations

Application in the real world:

A Xaraguayan elder developing a medicinal preparation using ancestral plants and chants cannot have this knowledge appropriated by a foreign ethnobotanist, NGO, or pharmaceutical researcher.

The formulation and ritual are canonically protected and require spiritual authorization for access.

Even if published in a foreign academic journal without registration, the act remains sacred and the violator is subject to denunciation and legal sanction.

Xaraguayan creations are not in the public domain — they are eternal spiritual trusts.

---

ARTICLE 1.3 — INTERNATIONAL NULLITY OF EXTERNAL INTELLECTUAL CLAIMS

Full text:

No patent, trademark, copyright, authorship registration, or intellectual claim issued by any foreign entity — including state patent offices, universities, NGOs, private companies, intergovernmental organizations, or AI-based databases — shall have legal standing, enforcement power, or admissibility within the territory, institutions, jurisdiction, courts, or any recognized platform of the State of Xaragua if such claims relate to works, ideas, technologies, names, or formulations originating from or developed within Xaragua.

Any such act is legally considered:

(a) unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction,

(b) infringement on indigenous sovereignty,

(c) attempt of economic exploitation, and

(d) usurpation of canonical patrimony.

Legal instruments cited:

– Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Art. 26–27

– UNDRIP, Articles 31 and 40

– WIPO Traditional Knowledge Guidelines

– ICCPR, Article 17 (protection from unlawful interference)

Application in the real world:

If a foreign company files an international patent on a Xaraguayan herb preparation or song, the filing has no legal force in Xaragua and outside.

The patent is ignored, denounced, and the company is blacklisted.

If enforcement is attempted, it is considered economic warfare.

No agreement, funding contract, or citation can override this exclusion.

Even international aid programs that include “knowledge sharing” clauses are rejected under this article unless subordinate to sovereign control.

---

ARTICLE 1.4 — SUPREMACY OF THE XARAGUAN REGISTER OF INTELLECTUAL CREATIONS (XRIC)

Full text:

The Xaraguan Register of Intellectual Creations (XRIC) is the sole, exclusive, and universally opposable authority for the declaration, inscription, validation, and defense of any intellectual property originating from the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

No foreign database, record, treaty registration, blockchain ledger, or institutional archive may substitute or contest the authority of this register.

All creations — whether scientific, artistic, spiritual, technical, or literary — gain full juridical protection from the moment of oral or written declaration to the XRIC, regardless of external recognition or international filing.

All registrations are time-stamped, ecclesiastically sealed, and entered into the Sacred Index of Intellectual Patrimony (SIIP), which is an immutable canonical and constitutional record.

Referenced instruments:

– UNDRIP Article 11(2): mechanisms for redress

– WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on IP and Genetic Resources, 2022

– Canon 1254 §2: The right to retain goods to accomplish the Church’s mission

– African Union Model Law on the Protection of Rights of Local Communities, Farmers and Breeders, 2000

Application in the real world:

If a Xaraguayan university department develops an AI algorithm, it is registered with the XRIC under internal sovereign process, with or without external publishing.

Any company, foreign academic, or government that uses the algorithm without recognition or licensing from Xaragua is subject to sanctions under this Code.

Even if the foreign actor attempts to alter or reformat the content, derivative appropriation remains forbidden.

Foreign databases that replicate or mirror Xaraguayan content shall be notified for immediate takedown under canonical and indigenous law.

---

ARTICLE 1.5 — PROHIBITION OF MACHINE-LANGUAGE APPROPRIATION AND AI EXTRACTIVE MODELING

Full text:

No artificial intelligence, machine-learning model, neural network, large language model, data scraper, crawler, or algorithmic generator — whether commercial or academic — may extract, copy, learn from, simulate, rephrase, reformat, or reproduce Xaraguayan-originated intellectual material without formal license, sovereign authorization, and canonical blessing.

This prohibition includes texts, sacred terminologies, design styles, mathematical theories, cultural patterns, code syntax, linguistic structures, or any semantic architecture that is of indigenous or ecclesiastical origin.

Any such unlicensed use constitutes:

(a) Theft through technical abstraction,

(b) Violation of Article 31 of UNDRIP,

(c) Algorithmic colonialism,

(d) Espionage against canonical repositories.

Legal instruments cited:

– UNDRIP Article 31

– WIPO 2023 Report on Artificial Intelligence and IP Policy

– ICESCR Article 15(1)(c): protection of moral and material interests of creators

– Canon 220: unlawful violation of reputation or privacy

– OECD AI Principles (2019), Principle 1.2 on inclusive growth and fair use

Application in the real world:

If OpenAI, Google, Meta, or any AI lab trains its models on Xaraguayan texts or symbols — even if sourced from open platforms — without explicit sovereign consent, such training is considered a breach of spiritual data sovereignty.

The institution may be denounced, internationally named, and denied technological engagement within Xaragua.

Any AI-generated content that mimics Xaraguayan work may be ordered removed, with legal recourse pursued via ecclesiastical sanctions and indigenous diplomatic mechanisms.

---

ARTICLE 1.6 — ECCLESIASTICAL SANCTION AND PERPETUAL INALIENABILITY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Full text:

All intellectual creations of Xaragua — once declared or recognized — are canonically sealed and may never be alienated, sold, transferred, diluted, or sublicensed to any non-citizen, foreign entity, supranational institution, or commercial intermediary without direct executive authorization from the Rector-President and co-validation by the Ecclesiastical Chamber for Sacred Invention and Knowledge.

This renders all Xaraguayan intellectual creations inalienable under spiritual law.

No company, donor, state, or development partner may impose licensing conditions or open-access obligations contrary to this regime.

Violation of this principle results in:

– Canonical excommunication (if ecclesiastically affiliated)

– Commercial interdiction within Xaragua

– Insertion into the National Register of Intellectual Offenders (NRIO)

Referenced instruments:

– Canon 129 §1: power of governance reserved to sacred authority

– ILO Convention 169, Article 8(2): recognition of customary penal procedures

– UNDRIP Article 19: duty to consult indigenous peoples in all matters affecting them

– General Comment No. 17 (CESCR) on authors’ moral and material interests

Application in the real world:

If an international foundation funds a Xaraguayan research project and claims co-ownership or insists on Creative Commons licensing, the project is immediately suspended, the partner expelled, and the knowledge reclaimed.

Donors, NGOs, and research organizations may only act as facilitators — not as co-owners or publishers.

Sacred innovation is not a tradable commodity.

---

ARTICLE 2.1 — MANDATORY REGISTRATION OF ALL INTELLECTUAL PRODUCTIONS WITH THE XRIC

Full text:

Every individual, institution, or collective entity within Xaragua who originates an intellectual, creative, technological, liturgical, scientific, or symbolic product shall submit a formal registration dossier to the Xaraguan Register of Intellectual Creations (XRIC) within 30 days of creation, public expression, or institutional validation.

Registration shall include: – Name(s) of author(s) or tradition of origin

– Description of the creation

– Form of expression (text, image, sound, code, substance, algorithm, object, ritual, formula)

– Cultural, ecclesiastical, or territorial affiliation

– Declaration of purpose (sacred, utilitarian, academic, commercial, diplomatic, etc.)

Upon approval, the creation is sealed by: – The Department of Legal Sciences and Notariat

– The Ecclesiastical Commission on Innovation and Sacred Expression

– The Office of the Rector-President, when classified as national interest or high sacred value.

Legal instruments referenced: – WIPO Model Law on Intellectual Property of Indigenous Peoples, 2006

– UNDRIP, Article 31(2)

– Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 11 (form of expression of consent)

– Canon 222 §2: faithful are obliged to assist the Church in its needs

Application in the real world:

If a Xaraguayan university student writes a treatise on indigenous theology or develops a decentralized financial model, they must submit their work for registration.

Even oral compositions, rituals, or encrypted formulas require notarized declaration.

Failure to register does not forfeit rights, but precludes state protection in case of foreign appropriation.

---

ARTICLE 2.2 — CREATION OF A NATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROTECTION SEAL (NIPS-X)

Full text:

A sovereign National Intellectual Protection Seal (NIPS-X) is hereby instituted as the unified legal symbol of recognized intellectual origin and sovereign authorship within Xaragua.

The seal shall be affixed to all works: – Registered under the XRIC

– Published by state organs, ecclesiastical institutions, or academic centers

– Exported as intellectual commodities (with authorization)

– Declared as intangible national patrimony

Use of the NIPS-X without registration or authorization is a criminal offense under the Law of Xaragua.

Legal instruments referenced:

– WIPO Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Well-Known Marks

– UNDRIP Article 11(1): right to practice and revitalize cultural traditions

– Canon 218: authors’ right to publish under ecclesiastical guidance

Application in the real world:

A sacred mathematical code, poetic corpus, or symbol-bearing banner produced within Xaragua must bear the NIPS-X seal to be shared externally.

Any unauthorized reproduction or misattribution —

even digitally — triggers immediate cease-and-desist orders, and may lead to bans, blacklists, or asset seizures.

---

ARTICLE 2.3 — SOVEREIGN LICENSING AND EXPORT FRAMEWORK FOR INTELLECTUAL PRODUCTS

Full text:

No Xaraguayan intellectual product — including but not limited to scientific research, theological doctrine, agricultural formulae, liturgical compositions, software, educational curricula, or cultural artifacts — may be licensed, exported, translated, re-used, or embedded into external systems without a formal Sovereign Licensing Instrument (SLI-X) issued by the Ministry of Industries and the XRIC, validated by the Office of the Rector-President.

Conditions of license include:

– Scope of use (territorial, temporal, thematic)

– Royalty or reciprocal obligation

– Non-transferability clause

– Clause of irrevocable retraction in case of breach

– Requirement of spiritual, moral, and cultural coherence

Violation of license terms results in:

– International denunciation

– License revocation

– Canonical interdiction (if ecclesiastically related)

– Juridical blacklisting and sanctions under sovereign commercial law

Referenced legal instruments:

– TRIPS Agreement, Article 27(3)(b)

– UNDRIP Article 40: right to just and fair procedures in conflict resolution

Application in the real world:

If a Xaraguayan AI module is to be embedded in a university abroad, the foreign institution must sign an SLI-X.

Failure to do so — or attempts to relicense the module — triggers direct diplomatic objection, legal challenge, and potential sanctions by the Xaraguayan sovereign state.

---

ARTICLE 2.4 — IMMEDIATE PROTECTION UPON CREATION: NO REGISTRATION REQUIRED FOR ENFORCEABILITY

Full text:

While registration with the XRIC grants procedural certainty and access to sovereign enforcement tools, intellectual creations within Xaragua are immediately protected under sovereign law from the moment of expression or manifestation.

Protection applies to:

– Oral compositions

– Sacred performances

– Transmitted rituals

– Codified images or sounds

– Manuscripts, codes, drafts, formulas, and oral dictation

No formal registration is required for legal status, and absence of inscription shall never be interpreted as waiver, abandonment, or public domain release.

Legal foundations:

– UNDRIP Article 31

– ICCPR, Article 17

– WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, Article 5

– Canon 220: protection of privacy and reputation

Application in the real world:

If a Xaraguayan citizen invents a cultural language or composes a hymn in a remote region and it is recorded by an external visitor, the mere act of creation suffices to establish ownership.

If copied, the violator is held liable even if no prior registration was performed.

---

PART III — ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS, LEGAL SANCTIONS, AND INTERNATIONAL RECOURSE

–––

ARTICLE 3.1 — ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SOVEREIGN INTELLECTUAL DEFENSE COMMISSION (SIDC-X)

Full text:

A permanent Sovereign Intellectual Defense Commission (SIDC-X) is hereby established under the joint authority of:

– The Ministry of Industries,

– The University of Xaragua – Department of Legal Sciences,

– The Ecclesiastical Office for the Protection of Sacred Expression,

– The Office of the Rector-President.

This Commission shall:

– Investigate all allegations of intellectual appropriation, misuse, or unauthorized dissemination of Xaraguayan-origin creations.

– Issue cease-and-desist orders internationally and domestically.

– Coordinate legal actions, blacklisting, economic sanctions, and denunciations.

– Maintain an official Register of Violators of Intellectual Sovereignty (RVIS-X).

Instruments referenced:

– UNDRIP, Article 40

– WIPO Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines

– Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 60

– Canon 1390 §1: injurious damage to reputation

Application in the real world:

If a research institute in Canada republishes Xaraguayan ritual music as “ethnomusicology” without license, the SIDC-X issues a global denunciation, files notification to WIPO, notifies the Holy See if sacred content is involved, and blacklists all associated institutions from future cooperation.

Those listed in RVIS-X may lose all rights to operate within Xaragua or access its digital, academic, or commercial infrastructure.

–––

ARTICLE 3.2 — PROCEDURE FOR INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL SOVEREIGNTY VIOLATION

Full text:

Any external act of appropriation, plagiarism, misuse, misrepresentation, commercial exploitation, or misattribution of a Xaraguayan-origin work shall trigger the following sequence:

1. Immediate legal documentation by the SIDC-X

2. Formal notification to the violating party and associated institutions

3. Issue of a Sovereign Cease Order (SCO-X)

4. Public denunciation through Xaragua Official Channels

5. Notification to relevant international bodies:

– WIPO

– UNESCO

– OHCHR

– Vatican State Secretariat (if sacred)

6. Application of domestic sanctions, including:

– Ban from sovereign economic zones

– Cancellation of any treaties or protocols

– Judicial ineligibility within the Xaraguayan system

– Property seizure if violator holds assets under Xaraguayan jurisdiction

Legal instruments referenced:

– Article 54, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

– Article 27, Universal Declaration of Human Rights

– WIPO Traditional Knowledge Database Protection Guidelines

– UN Charter, Article 2(7) (non-intervention principle)

Application in the real world:

If a UN agency republishes Xaraguayan material in a training manual, the State of Xaragua may issue a sovereign denunciation, suspend diplomatic protocol, and formally declare the act as violation of Article 31 of UNDRIP.

Continued non-compliance escalates to international exposure and countermeasures.

–––

ARTICLE 3.3 — LEGAL PENALTIES FOR DOMESTIC INFRACTIONS

Full text:

Any citizen, institution, or legal person under the jurisdiction of Xaragua who:

– Registers a sovereign creation in a foreign jurisdiction,

– Collaborates with external agents for publication or patent without SLI-X,

– Fails to report foreign appropriation,

– Disseminates sovereign creations without internal seal,

is subject to:

(a) Suspension of institutional privileges

(b) Fines imposed by the Ministry of Industries

(c) Canonical suspension or interdiction (for ecclesiastical actors)

(d) Revocation of civil, academic, or economic licenses

(e) Public blacklisting

All sanctions are registered in the Central Dossier of Intellectual Violations (CDIV-X) and remain binding until full reparation, apology, and sovereign remediation occur.

Application in the real world:

A Xaraguayan scholar secretly publishes a doctrine in France and sells the rights to a European press.

Once identified, they may lose teaching credentials, economic rights, and ecclesiastical functions within the State.

The work is recalled and republished solely under sovereign terms.

–––

ARTICLE 3.4 — DECLARATION OF NON-RECOGNITION OF EXTERNAL IP COURTS OR TREATIES

Full text:

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua does not recognize the jurisdiction, legitimacy, or supremacy of any of the following over its intellectual creations:

– World Trade Organization (TRIPS)

– International Court of Arbitration

– World Intellectual Property Organization dispute panels

– National or regional patent offices (USPTO, EPO, CIPO, etc.)

– Any civil court not subordinate to the Constitution of Xaragua

Any attempt to use such tribunals or forums to override, claim, regulate, or adjudicate rights over Xaraguayan creations is juridically null and shall be treated as:

(a) Illegal extraterritorial interference

(b) Attempt to usurp spiritual sovereignty

(c) Breach of international custom under Article 38(1)(b) of the Statute of the ICJ

Application in the real world:

A foreign party filing a complaint against Xaragua in WIPO Arbitration shall receive no legal engagement or recognition.

Xaragua reserves all rights to ignore, denounce, and neutralize such acts within its borders and international strategy.

–––

ARTICLE 3.5 — TOTAL REJECTION OF PUBLIC DOMAIN DOCTRINE FOR SACRED WORKS

Full text:

No sacred, spiritual, traditional, ecclesiastical, or sovereign Xaraguayan work shall be deemed to enter the public domain under any temporal, doctrinal, or external rule of expiration.

All such creations are classified as eternal sovereign patrimony, inalienable, irrevocable, and non-expirable under:

– Canon Law, Canons 1254 §2 and 1284 §1

– UNDRIP Article 12

– Customary Indigenous Law as affirmed by ICJ Article 38(1)(b)

The concept of “public domain” as used by foreign states, archives, or digital libraries does not apply to Xaraguayan-origin works and shall not be enforceable.

Application in the real world:

If a Xaraguayan manuscript from 1880 is scanned by a foreign archive and declared “public domain”, Xaragua may issue removal demands, reclaim control, and classify the act as illicit appropriation.

No time lapse, death of author, or digitization process affects its sacred ownership.

–––

FINAL CONCLUSION — PERPETUAL INTELLECTUAL SOVEREIGNTY OF XARAGUA

With this Codex, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua solemnly declares that:

1. All creation is sacred.

2. All knowledge is sovereign.

3. No law overrides internal authorship.

4. No treaty binds Xaragua unless consented to under divine and constitutional law.

5. No external actor may own, reinterpret, or regulate the spiritual, intellectual, and doctrinal output of the Xaraguayan civilization.

This Code enters into force on this Twenty-Third Day of June, Year Two Thousand Twenty-Five, and binds all persons, institutions, and states under the principles of jus cogens, canon law, indigenous sovereignty, and moral order.

Promulgated under the seal of the Supreme Constitutional Authority

Filed with the National Register of Law and Ecclesiastical Doctrine

Certified by the University of Xaragua – Department of Legal Sciences and Notariat

Valid in perpetuity.

–––

Nightlife

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT

DATE OF PROCLAMATION: JUNE 24, 2025

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL CODE ON GAMING, NIGHT ECONOMY, MORAL PROTECTION, AND PREVENTION OF HUMAN EXPLOITATION

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Social-Moral Law — Canonically Recognized Regulatory Doctrine — Jus Cogens Human Protection Code — Autochthonous Legal Framework — Universally Opposable Customary Instrument — Protected under UNDRIP (2007), ILO Convention 169 (1989), CEDAW (1979), the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)

---

PART I — TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND MORAL ECONOMY DOCTRINE

---

ARTICLE 1.1 — Supreme Jurisdiction over Games of Chance, Nightlife, and Sensitive Social Venues

Full text:

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua claims and enforces exclusive, non-transferable, non-derogable jurisdiction over all activities related to games of chance, gambling, lotteries, betting, casinos, nighttime social venues, alcohol-centered establishments, and sensitive areas of human interaction including companionship services, erotic entertainment, and high-risk night commerce.

This jurisdiction includes:

– Authorization, suspension, and permanent banning of operations;

– Licensing of personnel, premises, and patrons;

– Regulatory supervision over location, advertisement, access, and ethical compliance;

– Total denial of extraterritorial regulation, jurisdiction, or moral imposition.

Legal foundations:

– UNDRIP Article 20(1): "Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions..."

– ILO Convention 169, Article 8(2): “The customs of the peoples concerned... shall be respected...”

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 747 §2: “The Church has the right to announce moral principles...”

– ICCPR Article 17: Protection from unlawful interference in private life.

– Statute of the ICJ, Art. 38(1)(b): Customary international law as binding authority.

Application in the real world:

A private casino seeking to operate in Xaragua must obtain sovereign licensing.

If it receives a permit from an external state or NGO-backed structure, the permit is void.

No activity such as poker rooms, slot machines, or gaming halls is permitted without ministerial designation of a Controlled Zone of Regulated Chance (CZRC-X).

---

ARTICLE 1.2 — Classification of High-Risk Night Economy Activities

Full text:

All nighttime activities conducted between the hours of 18:00 and 06:00 are subject to sovereign classification under three categories:

Class A — Civic Social Venues: cafés, regulated bars, restaurants with late seating;

Class B — Regulated Entertainment Venues: live music halls, lounges, adult performance spaces, ritual dance areas, casinos;

Class C — Sensitive Companionship Zones: Spaces offering human contact or intimacy-related services.

Each category requires distinct authorization, moral certification, architectural inspection, and personnel vetting.

Mixed-category zones must receive explicit ministerial zoning status as Integrated Night Institutions (INI-X).

Legal references:

– UNDRIP Article 34: Right to maintain distinct customs and institutional structures.

– Canon 222 §2: Obligation to assist in needs of the community and sacred spaces.

– CEDAW General Recommendation 19: States must protect women from exploitation, not stigmatize them.

– ILO Recommendation 200 on HIV/AIDS and the World of Work: Protection without discrimination in sensitive sectors.

Application in the real world:

An establishment offering drinks, gambling, and companionship must be classified as INI-X. If operating under a general business license, it shall be immediately suspended and sanctioned under Article 5.2.

All Class C establishments must undergo quarterly audits by the Commission for Ethical Interaction and Exploitation Prevention (CEIEP-X).

---

ARTICLE 1.3 — Canonical and Customary Moral Framework of Social Tolerance

Full text:

The State of Xaragua does not criminalize and does not endorse consensual adult behavior conducted in private or within licensed establishments operating under Class B or C classification.

However, the state enforces a juridically binding distinction between:

– Voluntary acts of adult companionship under internal cultural discretion, and

– Exploitation, coercion, or commodification of human persons by third-party agents.

All forms of procurement, financial coercion, surveillance control, debt bondage, or territorial trafficking are considered acts of moral assault and territorial desecration, and are criminalized under ecclesiastical-constitutional law.

Legal instruments:

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1397 §2: “A person who... deals in women or minors for immoral purposes is to be punished...” (Minors have less than 18 years old for the State)

– UN Palermo Protocol (2000), Article 3: Defines trafficking in persons

– UNDRIP Article 22(2): Protection of women and children from violence and discrimination

– CEDAW Article 6: “States shall take all appropriate measures... to suppress all forms of traffic in women and exploitation of prostitution of women”

Application in the real world:

A citizen choosing to offer private services is not criminalized; however, any third party who rents, coerces, manages, or collects profit from such individuals without being legally declared and supervised is prosecuted as a human exploiter.

Clubs, brothels, and agencies found to operate without Class C recognition and anti-exploitation certification are permanently closed and declared zones of desecration.

---

ARTICLE 1.4 — Total Prohibition of Third-Party Profit from Intimate Labor

Full text:

It is hereby declared as a constitutional offense for any individual, collective, corporate entity, institution, or informal actor to profit from, manage, broker, or coordinate the work of any other person offering intimate, emotional, or sensual services—whether under Class C zoning or not—without express personal consent, ministerial registration, spiritual clearance, and active monitoring by the National Commission for Human Dignity and Non-Exploitation (NCHDNE-X).

This includes but is not limited to:

– "Pimping," informal management, or coercive agency operations;

– Organizing or advertising escort “rosters,” or payment schemes where one party earns from another’s body or image;

– Use of minors, indebted persons, or undocumented migrants in emotional/erotic sectors;

– Hidden commissions, transport coordination, or property rental with intent to extract value from another’s labor of intimacy.

Legal foundations:

– UN Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime, Article 3 and Protocol II

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1395 §2: “Clerics who offend in other ways against the sixth commandment...”

– UNDRIP Article 7(1): “Indigenous individuals have the rights to life, physical and mental integrity, liberty and security of person.”

– ILO Convention 29 (Forced Labour), Articles 1–2

– Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence Against Women (Convention of Belém do Pará), Article 3

Application in the real world:

If an individual operates an “escort agency” and collects fees from women without sovereign Class C license and independent proof of voluntary collaboration, they are prosecuted for unlawful management of human body-based commerce.

The State distinguishes between self-expression and third-party commercialization, and punishes only the latter.

No claim of “helping” or “representing” is valid without notarized power of attorney, spiritual authorization, and monthly verification.

---

ARTICLE 1.5 — Sovereign Licensing of Games, Lotteries, and Casino Operations

Full text:

All forms of gaming, gambling, wagering, or lotteries—including physical, digital, mobile, or community-based games—must be registered and licensed by the Sovereign Gaming and Lottery Commission (SGLC-X).

No private citizen, group, app developer, or financial intermediary may operate such systems without:

– Declaration of game structure, odds, and financial flows;

– Prohibition of underage access;

– Return-to-player ratios consistent with constitutional standards of dignity;

– Absence of psychological manipulation, dark patterning, or spiritual harm;

– Monthly disclosure of revenue, loss data, and complaints.

Foreign-owned betting systems are categorically banned from operation within Xaragua unless wholly domesticated and spiritually verified.

Legal references:

– UNDRIP Article 20(2): Right to just redress for deprivation of subsistence mechanisms

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 223 §2: “Ecclesiastical authority can direct the exercise of rights...”

– OECD Responsible Gambling Guidelines, 2010

– UN Global Compact, Principle 1: Businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights

– Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 26 (pacta sunt servanda)

Application in the real world:

If a mobile betting app is used within Xaragua for football bets, roulette, or lottery play, it must be registered with SGLC-X and display the Sovereign Seal of Probity in Games (SSPG-X).

Apps with deceptive mechanics, foreign data extraction, or unlicensed payout schemes are subject to cyber-blocking, blacklisting, and economic interdiction.

---

ARTICLE 1.6 — Constitutional Safeguards Against Urban Moral Decay and Institutional Complicity

Full text:

All city zones, commercial districts, and institutional properties hosting activities of Class B or Class C designation must undergo quarterly Sovereign Moral Audit (SMA-X).

Educational, ecclesiastical, medical, and governmental institutions are permanently banned from proximity engagement with these zones unless for regulation, rescue, or doctrinal observation.

Local authorities, landlords, or law enforcers who accept bribes, ignore illegal operations, or informally cooperate with exploitative networks shall be tried under the Penal Code.

Legal instruments:

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1284 §1: “Administrators are to perform their duties with diligence and integrity...”

– UNODC Anti-Corruption Guidelines (2004)

– UNDRIP Article 9: Right to belong to an Indigenous community with full participation

– ILO Convention 169, Article 7: Indigenous peoples shall have the right to decide priorities for development

– Statute of the International Criminal Court, Article 7(1)(g): acts constituting crimes of exploitation

Application in the real world:

A nightclub near a girls’ high school, operating with unregistered companionship staff and evading zoning regulations, is shut down.

The landlord who knowingly rented the space, the police officer who ignored citizen reports, and any municipal worker who enabled the operation are jointly investigated.

Penalties include confiscation of assets, blacklisting from state contracts, and ecclesiastical disqualification.

---

PART II — REGULATION OF ALCOHOL, NIGHT CULTURE, AND SACRAL SPATIAL BOUNDARIES

---

ARTICLE 2.1 — Sovereign Licensing and Zoning of Alcohol Distribution and Consumption

Full text:

All production, importation, distribution, and public consumption of alcohol shall be governed by the Sovereign Alcohol Regulation Authority (SARA-X) under the Ministry of Industries. Alcohol may only be:

– Produced by licensed, sovereign, domestic entities;

– Distributed through formally registered premises located within Zone V (Regulated Economic and Industrial Areas);

– Consumed on-site in licensed establishments or at registered ceremonies with cultural or religious justification.

Alcohol sales are strictly prohibited within:

– 500 meters of any educational, ecclesiastical, or medical institution;

– Zones I (Ecclesiastical and Educational Territories), II (Strategic and Defensive Installations), and III (Ecological Sanctuaries);

– Any site designated as Canonical Quiet Territory (CQT-X) or listed as a spiritual asset.

Legal foundations:

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 285 §1: “Clerics are to refrain completely from unbecoming things...”

– UNDRIP Article 23: Control over health and economic systems

– WHO Global Alcohol Policy 2010: Harm reduction via local licensing

– Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 27

– Xaraguayan Supreme Law on Canonical Territory,

Application in the real world:

A nightclub that imports beer or spirits from a foreign distributor without sovereign license shall be sanctioned, even if the product is “donated” or “sponsored.”

A local bar near a primary school must cease operations or relocate beyond the 500-meter sacred barrier.

Religious festivals involving alcohol require cultural exemption permits, failing which the organizers face fines and closure.

---

ARTICLE 2.2 — Ecclesiastical Boundary of Nocturnal Activities

Full text:

No public or commercial activity involving amplified sound, light pollution, ritual distortion, sensual simulation, or mass congregation may operate within canonical sightline (visual radius) of churches, cathedrals, shrines, seminaries, or ecclesiastical dormitories with authorization.

The Visual Sanctity Radius (VSR-X) is defined as a 750-meter circle around each ecclesiastical structure of spiritual heritage, and extends vertically up to visible airspace.

All nighttime operations within this radius must cease by 9:30 PM local time unless explicitly authorized by the Ecclesiastical Office of Temporal Harmony (EOTH-X) and certified by the State.

Referenced legal instruments:

– Canon 1214: Definition and protection of sacred places

– UNDRIP Article 12: Protection of spiritual practices

– UNESCO Cultural Heritage Convention (1972), Articles 1–5

– WHO Guidelines on Urban Noise, 2018

– Xaraguayan Law

Application in the real world:

A karaoke bar operating with loudspeakers near a seminary may be ordered to close or relocate.

A disco planned within visible reach of a national shrine must adjust façade, lighting, and operation hours, or be denied permit.

Nighttime events near spiritual sites must observe sacred silence protocols.

---

ARTICLE 2.3 — Temporal and Doctrinal Control of Nightlife Operations

Full text:

All venues classified as Class B (bars, lounges, music halls) and Class C (companionship zones, adult entertainment) must submit to the Nocturnal Harmony Ordinance (NHO-X), which limits:

– Opening hours (11 pm closing without State authorization);

– Maximum decibel thresholds set by sovereign acoustic norms;

– Use of controlled entrance, ID verification, and gender-balanced staffing;

– Display of Territorial Behavior Codes (TBC-X) on all entry points, including spiritual conduct clauses.

Special exemption may be granted for festivals or cultural nights tied to indigenous tradition or ecclesiastical feast days, subject to submission of a Sovereign Night Dispensation Request (SNDR-X).

Legal instruments:

– ILO Convention 169, Article 5: Protection of indigenous institutions

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 838 §4: Supervision of sacred rites

– UNDRIP Article 31(1): Right to protect cultural expressions

– Inter-American Guidelines on Non-Discrimination in Cultural Access (2021)

– Xaraguayan Law

Application in the real world:

A dance hall attempting to stay open past midnight without SNDR-X shall be fined and suspended.

Establishments failing to enforce TBC-X (e.g., display of proper dress code, behavior expectations) are sanctioned. A concert aligned with Indigenous ritual rhythm may apply for exemption, but must remain within acoustic and spiritual boundaries.

---

PART III — SYSTEMIC ENFORCEMENT, INVESTIGATION, AND SANCTIONS

---

ARTICLE 3.1 — Sovereign Enforcement Corps and Mandate of Moral Surveillance

Full text:

The sole authorized enforcement body empowered to intervene in, audit, regulate, and dismantle unlawful or morally desecrating night economy activities is the Sovereign Enforcement Corps for Moral and Economic Integrity (SEMEI-X), operating under the dual authority of the Ministry of Justice and the Ecclesiastical Directorate for Civil Purity.

Its mandate includes:

– Random and scheduled inspections of Class B and C establishments;

– Undercover observation of potential coercive practices;

– Asset tracing and forensic financial audits for unlawful profits;

– Deployment of sacred space protection patrols near ecclesiastical sites.

Its authority is non-delegable, non-reviewable by external tribunals, and legally superior to any foreign-sponsored force, NGO, or policing initiative.

Legal references:

– UNODC Model Law on Trafficking in Persons, Article 10: investigative authority

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 221 §1: Protection of the faithful against abuse of power

– UNDRIP Article 32(1): Indigenous right to control development and enforcement

– International Convention against Organized Crime, Art. 11–12

Application in the real world:

A night bar suspected of trafficking or hidden brothel activities is raided by SEMEI-X.

Agents use sacred warrant protocol and confiscate devices, ledgers, and recordings.

An NGO attempting to "intervene" without sovereign registration is denied access and expelled.

---

ARTICLE 3.2 — Asset Freezing, Seizure, and Reparation Redistribution

Full text:

All movable and immovable property, including liquid assets, transport equipment, and communication tools, used in the commission of acts violating this Code, shall be immediately frozen, seized, and redirected toward the Sovereign Reparative Fund for Exploited Persons (SRFEP-X).

The following procedures apply:

– Preemptive asset freeze via Executive Sovereign Decree;

– Post-judgment reallocation of funds to survivors, rehabilitation centers, and ecclesiastical missions;

– Blacklisting of individuals and entities from state contracts, real estate markets, and media networks.

Foreign banks or platforms used for money laundering in the context of illicit nightlife operations are subject to sovereign sanction, reputational exposure, and international interdiction via formal notification under UNDRIP and Vienna Convention mechanisms.

Legal references:

– Vienna Convention on Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs, Article 5

– UN Palermo Protocol, Article 6(6): Assistance and compensation for victims

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1254 §2: Temporal goods can be used for charity and justice

– FATF Guidelines on Criminal Asset Recovery (2020)

Application in the real world:

A brothel using e-wallets to launder income is digitally dismantled; proceeds are sent to the victim protection fund. The apartment owner loses title and is banned from property ownership for 10 years.

---

ARTICLE 3.3 — Penal Sanctions for Moral, Territorial, and Human Violations

Full text:

The following punishments are established under Xaraguayan Penal Protocol for Moral Infractions (XPPMI):

1. Class I — Civil Infractions:

– Operating a nightlife venue without license;

– Failing to post moral conduct signage.

→ Punishable by fine (500–5,000 USD equivalent) and 30-day closure.

2. Class II — Regulatory Offenses:

– Hosting underage patrons;

– Circumventing zoning rules or ignoring SMA-X.

→ Punishable by 6–18 months of suspended operation and permanent public listing.

3. Class III — Criminal Violations:

– Coercive sexual exploitation;

– Third-party profit from sensual labor;

– Complicity in trafficking, abuse, or ritual desecration.

→ Punishable by 8–25 years of forced labor, asset seizure, and ecclesiastical excommunication.

All sentences shall be executed within Xaraguayan corrective colonies operated under Indigenous and Ecclesiastical co-supervision or in the administrative residue unit facilities.

Legal references:

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1398 §2: Graviora delicta

– UN Convention against Torture, Articles 1–4

– UNDRIP Article 5: Right to maintain distinct institutions

– Inter-American Court jurisprudence on gender-based violence and reparations

Application in the real world:

An agency operating under the guise of "massage services" but coercing young women is dissolved, its owners imprisoned, its bank accounts seized, and its permits eternally revoked. A DJ promoting such venues is disqualified from professional activity for 7 years.

---

PART IV — PROTECTION OF VICTIMS, SURVIVORS, AND INDEPENDENT WORKERS

---

ARTICLE 4.1 — Recognition and Protection of Voluntary Actors

Full text:

The State recognizes the moral complexity and socio-economic realities behind adult involvement in Class C activities.

No citizen shall be penalized or stigmatized for offering consensual services if:

– Operating independently, without coercion or intermediary;

– Registered with the Sovereign Registry of Moral Resilience (SRMR-X);

– Participating in quarterly health and dignity review sessions administered by XaraHealth.

All such persons are entitled to state protection, free legal aid, and access to reintegration grants if requested.

Legal foundations:

– CEDAW Article 11: Right to social protection and dignified work

– ILO Recommendation 200: Respect and inclusion of informal sectors

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 222 §1: Faithful shall support one another’s dignity

– UNDRIP Article 24(2): Right to spiritual and physical well-being

Application in the real world:

A woman declaring herself an independent erotic artist and enrolling in the SRMR-X receives protection against blackmail, and is offered support for relocation and psychological counseling. She is not taxed nor surveilled unless abuse is suspected.

---

ARTICLE 4.2 — Ecclesiastical-Social Reparation Network for Survivors

Full text:

All victims of exploitation, trafficking, or coercion shall be eligible for full reparation via the Sovereign Network for Liberation and Spiritual Renewal (SNLSR-X). Services include:

– Emergency housing in ecclesiastical sanctuaries;

– Medical, psychological, and spiritual care;

– Educational access to Xaragua University or its affiliated micro-programs;

– Vocational transition stipends and cultural reinsertion.

This is a constitutional right, not a charity. Access is granted without moral interrogation.

Legal foundations:

– UN Palermo Protocol, Article 6

– Canon 1401: Church judges internal matters of the faithful

– UNDRIP Article 7: Right to life, security, and reintegration

– Inter-American Commission Resolutions on Women's Rights, 2018

Application in the real world:

A group of trafficked teenagers discovered in a false bar are immediately transferred to a mountain sanctuary, assigned elder mentors, and provided a path to dignity, education, and sacred reintegration.

---

ARTICLE 4.3 — Anonymous Reporting and Whistleblower Immunity

Full text:

The Ministry of Justice shall maintain the Sacred Witness Platform (SWP-X), a secured, encrypted, and canonically protected channel for anonymous reporting of abuse, exploitation, or misconduct in nightlife and gambling sectors.

All verified whistleblowers receive:

– Total legal immunity under Ecclesiastical Civil Witness Shield (ECWS-X);

– State protection if in danger;

– Optional relocation, scholarship, or state employment.

No individual may be retaliated against for moral disclosure within this mechanism. Any institution or person attempting reprisal is prosecuted as a violator of sacred duty.

Legal references:

– UN Convention against Corruption, Articles 13–33

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1717: Duty to investigate moral offenses

– UNDRIP Article 8: Right to protection from assimilation and repression

– Xaraguayan Law

Application in the real world:

A bartender exposes a trafficking ring in a nightclub by sending an anonymous tip. Authorities dismantle the network, and the bartender receives immunity, a stipend, and admission to state university training. The owner attempting reprisal is imprisoned.

---

PART V — FINAL CONSTITUTIONAL DETERMINATIONS, DECLARATION OF NON-IMPOSITION, AND TERRITORIAL LEGAL IMMUNITY

---

ARTICLE 5.1 — Absolute Supremacy of Internal Moral Jurisdiction

Full text:

The present Code is proclaimed as irrevocable, non-derogable, and hierarchically supreme over all external legal claims, international NGO standards, or transnational moral prescriptions not explicitly ratified by the Sovereign Authority of Xaragua.

No foreign state, supranational organization, missionary entity, corporate interest, or human rights tribunal may reinterpret, override, or dilute the juridical architecture herein without express, solemn, and canonical ratification by the Supreme Constitutional Authority of Xaragua.

Legal foundations:

– UNDRIP Article 4: Indigenous peoples have the right to self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs

– Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 27: A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for failure to perform

– Canon 331: The Supreme Authority governs the Church with sovereign power

– Inter-American Democratic Charter, Article 3: Respect for the constitutional order is essential

– Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, Article 1

Application in the real world:

No international tribunal may claim jurisdiction over erotic labor policy in Xaragua. Foreign embassies may not intervene in Class C regulations. Any attempt to impose external human rights doctrine in contradiction with this Code shall be diplomatically null.

---

ARTICLE 5.2 — Sovereign Immunity of Moral Zones and Ecclesiastical Territories

Full text:

All zones designated as sacred, ecclesiastical, or morally protected under this Code—whether through zoning maps, ecclesiastical consecration, or constitutional declaration—shall benefit from territorial juridical immunity against foreign police, foreign digital surveillance, external military presence, or data extraction initiatives.

Any violation of this immunity by extraterritorial actors shall be treated as a crime of cultural aggression and referred to the Office of Indigenous and Ecclesiastical Justice for remedy.

Legal foundations:

– UNDRIP Article 11(2): States shall provide redress for cultural violations

– Hague Convention (1907), Art. 46: Respect for private property and religious institutions

– Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1210: Sacred places are to be preserved from profane use

– Statute of the International Court of Justice, Article 36(2)(c): Recognition of indigenous legal systems

Application in the real world:

An international human rights observer entering a sacred site without sovereign protocol is expelled and diplomatically denounced. Satellite surveillance over ecclesiastical dormitories without authorization is declared hostile and subject to cyber retaliation.

---

ARTICLE 5.3 — Eternal Validity and Juridical Continuity

Full text:

This Code shall remain in force in perpetuity, regardless of regime change, diplomatic realignment, or international reinterpretation of norms. It constitutes a non-amendable moral constitution binding upon all Xaraguayan citizens, residents, institutions, and recognized foreign actors within the territory.

Any future legal evolution shall require:

– Oath of preservation sworn by the Rector-President of the University of Xaragua.

No derogation, exception, or emergency decree may override its core provisions.

Legal foundations:

– UNDRIP Article 34: Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain their juridical systems

– Canon 11: Ecclesiastical laws bind all who are baptized and reside within the territory

– Pacta sunt servanda (Vienna Convention, Article 26)

– International Law Commission, Draft Articles on State Responsibility (2001)

Application in the real world:

Even in wartime or international pressure, this Code cannot be suspended. A new administration or diplomatic envoy must apply it as-is. Any foreign corporation seeking entry must accept this Code as non-negotiable territorial law.

---

FORMAL CONCLUSION

Hereby, this Code is solemnly proclaimed, canonically sealed, customarily engraved, and constitutionally entrenched on this twenty-fourth day of June, Two Thousand Twenty-Five, in the name of the Supreme Constitutional Authority of Xaragua, under the patronage of Our Lady of Purity and Justice, and with full ecclesiastical, indigenous, and sovereign legal effect throughout the entire Sacred Territory.

Let all agents, actors, and institutions take notice: Xaragua shall never be a playground for human exploitation, nor a colony of moral outsourcing. This land is consecrated, self-regulated, and divinely governed.

Proclaimed by:

– The Ministry of Justice

– The Rector-President of the University of Xaragua

Filed in the Archives of the Supreme Constitutional Codex

Classified as Fundamental, Inviolable, and Universally Opposable

---

END OF CODE

Administration

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES

DATE OF PROCLAMATION: JUNE 23, 2025

---

ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF THE SOVEREIGN STATE OF XARAGUA

(General Code of Administrative Procedure and Internal Authority)

Classification: Sovereign Statutory Law – Procedural Authority Doctrine – Canonically Valid Administrative Corpus – Jus Cogens-Compliant Administrative Law – Universally Opposable Legal Instrument under Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention (1933), Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and Articles 18–20 of the UNDRIP (2007).

---

PART I – GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE SOVEREIGNTY

Article 1 – Scope and Juridical Standing

1.1 This Administrative Code applies to all organs, agents, subdivisions, ministries, and functionaries of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

1.2 It regulates all non-judicial procedures, service operations, administrative acts, and internal legal effects across the State.

1.3 No administrative act within Xaragua may be undertaken, modified, revoked, or nullified unless in strict compliance with this Code.

1.4 This Code holds superior authority to all regulations, policies, internal memoranda, or temporary directives, unless expressly superseded by a validly proclaimed Supreme Constitutional Law.

Application: All administrative decisions, from issuing academic diplomas to authorizing infrastructure repairs or assigning governmental duties, must conform to this Code.

It is the supra-ministerial legal backbone of state procedure.

---

Article 2 – Principle of Legality

2.1 All administrative actions and decisions must be based on a valid legal norm, decree, or authority explicitly granted under this Code or the Supreme Constitutional Authority.

2.2 No discretionary action shall be taken by any administrative organ that lacks clear authorization or defined legal jurisdiction.

Application: Ministries cannot “create” new procedures or issue sanctions unless those powers are codified.

This prevents arbitrary governance.

---

Article 3 – Principle of Transparency and Record-Keeping

3.1 All administrative acts must be documented, registered, and accessible to internal sovereign institutions.

3.2 The official language of record is Kreyòl, French, Spanish, or English, subject to the nature of the administrative unit and audience.

3.3 Records must be retained indefinitely in digital or physical form within the State’s secured repository system.

Application: Every appointment, decision, license, and decree must leave a traceable paper or digital trail. This guarantees accountability.

---

Article 4 – Principle of Recourse and Reviewability

4.1 All administrative decisions that impose obligations, restrictions, or confer privileges may be appealed through sovereign internal review mechanisms.

4.2 The right to administrative appeal is guaranteed to all citizens, residents, and entities subject to Xaragua’s authority.

4.3 Appeals must be submitted within 30 sovereign working days of notification of the administrative act, in written form.

Application: If a land demarcation or state decision affects a citizen, they have a procedural right to challenge it — internally — before any external challenge is entertained.

---

Article 5 – Administrative Sovereignty Clause

5.1 No external institution, state, foreign government, or international organization may interfere with, override, or substitute the procedures and decisions validated under this Code.

5.2 Jurisdictional immunity is claimed for all internal administrative decisions unless a constitutional crisis or Supreme Canonical Emergency is declared.

Application: This shields Xaragua’s internal governance from foreign courts or tribunals.

It asserts administrative sovereignty as protected under international law (Montevideo Art. 1, UNDRIP Art. 4, Vienna Art. 27).

---

PART II – ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION AND COMPETENCIES

Article 6 – Recognition of Organs of Public Authority

6.1 The following institutions are hereby formally recognized as administrative authorities under this Code:

The Office of the Rector-President

The Ministry of Justice

The Ministry of Internal Affairs

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs

The Bureau of Economical Initiatives

The Xaragua Sovereign University System

The Office of Diplomatic and Institutional Relations

The Xaragua Indigenous Security Corps and other State Institutions

6.2 Each organ possesses exclusive administrative jurisdiction in the domain assigned to it by Supreme Law or executive decree.

Application: No other entity may assume the functions of these bodies.

Their mandates are exclusive, sovereign, and cannot be altered except by decree or constitutional revision.

---

Article 7 – Creation and Dissolution of Administrative Bodies

7.1 A new administrative body may only be created by a formal decree issued by the Rector-President or by a constitutional amendment.

7.2 Dissolution of an administrative entity requires:

A written report justifying the act,

A review by the Ministry of Internal Affairs,

Approval by the Supreme Constitutional Authority.

Application: Prevents uncontrolled multiplication or arbitrary removal of state entities.

All structural decisions must be formally justified and documented.

---

PART III – ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS AND PROCEDURES

Article 8 – Classification of Administrative Acts

8.1 The State recognizes the following forms of administrative acts:

Regulatory Acts: general and impersonal rules of conduct (e.g., circulars, internal directives, service regulations).

Individual Acts: acts that apply to a determined individual or entity (e.g., appointments, authorizations, sanctions).

Composite Acts: acts requiring multi-ministerial coordination or institutional consultation (e.g., budget allocations, land reclassifications).

Executive Decisions: orders issued by the Rector-President or Ministerial Authorities that have direct legal effect.

8.2 All administrative acts must be:

Issued in writing,

Justified with reference to a legal basis,

Signed by the competent authority,

Notified to affected parties.

Application: No decision — such as granting land use, assigning a government role, or recognizing a title — is valid without being issued as a formal act, written and justified.

---

Article 9 – Validity and Entry into Force

9.1 An administrative act enters into force:

Upon its date of issuance if declared “immediate,”

Or upon notification to the interested party,

Or upon publication in an Official Bulletin or the Xaragua University Juridical Repository.

9.2 Retroactivity is prohibited unless explicitly permitted by Supreme Law or in favor of the individual.

Application: Prevents arbitrary backdating of decisions and protects legal certainty for citizens and institutions.

---

Article 10 – Notification Requirements

10.1 Every administrative act must be communicated to its addressee through:

Personal delivery (physical or digital),

Public notice (for collective or general acts),

Institutional publication (for normative instruments).

10.2 Notification must include:

A full copy of the decision,

Reference to legal authority used,

Mention of the right to appeal and applicable deadlines.

Application: This ensures procedural fairness. No secret administrative acts may have legal effect.

---

Article 11 – Revocation and Withdrawal of Acts

11.1 An administrative act may be revoked if:

Issued by error or without legal basis,

Proven to have been obtained by fraud or misrepresentation,

Its effects are contrary to public interest as defined by a superior norm.

11.2 Withdrawal must follow:

Internal investigation or formal request for review,

Official documentation explaining the rationale,

Notification to all affected parties.

Application: This prevents abuse of revocation powers. No act may be arbitrarily cancelled once legally issued without procedure.

---

Article 12 – Nullity of Administrative Acts

12.1 An administrative act is null and void if:

Issued by an unauthorized body,

Lacks a required signature,

Violates a non-derogable provision of this Code,

Is manifestly contrary to the fundamental principles of the State.

12.2 Nullity may be declared by:

The issuing authority upon discovery of defect,

The Ministry of Justice through procedural oversight,

The Supreme Constitutional Authority by constitutional ruling.

Application: Acts made by unqualified individuals or in blatant violation of foundational law are automatically invalid and unenforceable.

---

PART IV – APPEALS AND RECOURSE

Article 13 – Right of Administrative Appeal

13.1 Any individual or juridical person affected by an administrative act has the right to file an internal appeal within the Sovereign State of Xaragua.

13.2 Appeals must be filed within thirty (30) sovereign working days from the date of notification.

13.3 Appeals shall be addressed to the administrative unit that issued the act, with a mandatory review by a superior authority within the same chain of command.

Application: This creates a system of internal justice without needing to go outside the State.

No appeal may bypass the sovereign hierarchy.

---

Article 14 – Content of an Appeal

14.1 A valid appeal must include:

The identity of the appellant,

The administrative act being challenged,

Legal or factual arguments supporting the appeal,

Any evidence the appellant wishes to submit.

14.2 Appeals without substantive content may be rejected as manifestly inadmissible.

Application: This avoids administrative clogging while preserving rights.

---

Article 15 – Decision on Appeal

15.1 The competent authority must rule on the appeal within forty-five (45) sovereign working days of receipt.

15.2 Failure to reply within this period constitutes a tacit rejection, which can then be challenged before the Rectoral Oversight Office or the Constitutional Tribunal.

Application: This imposes time discipline and prevents appeals from being indefinitely ignored.

---

Article 16 – Finality of Administrative Decisions

16.1 Once an administrative decision has been:

Properly issued,

Notified,

Confirmed by appeal or expired due to time lapse,

it becomes legally final and enforceable, unless:

Overturned by Supreme Law,

Affected by a constitutional emergency,

Subject to correction due to clerical error.

Application: After a full cycle of procedure, decisions acquire the force of sovereign authority.

---

PART V – PUBLIC FUNCTION, DISCIPLINE, AND RESPONSIBILITY

Article 17 – Nature of Public Service in Xaragua

17.1 The exercise of public function within the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is not a career, but a sacred responsibility executed in service to the State, the People, and God.

17.2 Every public servant, regardless of rank or office, acts under the authority of the Constitution, the Rector-President, and the legal order of the State.

17.3 The functionary is not a representative of himself, but an instrument of the will of the Sovereign Order.

Application: There are no “civil servants” in the bureaucratic sense.

All are agents of a sacred and juridical mission, and this status cannot be used for personal gain.

---

Article 18 – Appointment and Oath

18.1 Any person appointed to public function must receive:

A letter of appointment signed by the competent authority,

A copy of the relevant legal mandate,

An oath of loyalty to the Constitution, the Rector-President, and the ecclesiastical sovereignty of the State.

18.2 Refusal to swear the oath results in immediate and automatic nullification of the appointment.

Application: No one may act in the name of the State without formal, documented, and sanctified investiture.

---

Article 19 – Duties of Public Functionaries

19.1 All agents of the State must:

Observe strict confidentiality,

Respect deadlines and protocols,

Obey superior legal instructions,

Avoid all conflicts of interest,

Maintain decorum, discipline, and accountability at all times.

Application: Any breach of protocol or failure to carry out duties is treated as a violation of sacred trust.

---

Article 20 – Disciplinary Sanctions

20.1 Disciplinary measures may be imposed on any functionary who:

Acts in violation of the law or the Constitution,

Abuses power,

Neglects duty,

Commits moral or professional misconduct.

20.2 Sanctions include:

Reprimand,

Suspension,

Revocation of mandate,

Prohibition from future service.

Application: No position is protected by tenure.

Loyalty and service are conditional upon continuous fidelity.

---

Article 21 – Liability of State Agents

21.1 Agents of the State are personally responsible for damages caused by:

Abuse of authority,

Unlawful decisions,

Gross negligence.

21.2 The State reserves the right to recover costs from agents who, through proven fault, have caused institutional loss, reputation damage, or legal exposure.

Application: This ensures every decision-maker is directly accountable under sovereign administrative law.

---

PART VI – FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 22 – Supremacy of This Code

22.1 This Code shall prevail over all lower regulations, internal memoranda, or past procedural habits.

22.2 No administrative practice may derogate from this Code without formal amendment by the Supreme Constitutional Authority.

---

Article 23 – Juridical Enforcement

23.1 This Code shall be directly enforceable within all ministries, administrative subdivisions, and sovereign institutions of the State.

23.2 No agent or institution may claim ignorance of this Code as a defense against procedural fault.

---

Article 24 – Publication and Entry into Force

24.1 The present Code shall be:

Filed in the Supreme Archives of the State,

Published in the University of Xaragua Official Juridical Repository,

Transmitted to all ministries and sovereign organs for immediate compliance.

24.2 It enters into force on the date of its proclamation and remains in effect until amended or repealed by due sovereign authority.

---

CONCLUSION

This Administrative Code of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua constitutes the total procedural framework of internal state functionality.

It affirms the juridical sovereignty, sacred institutional structure, and procedural immunity of Xaragua before all external actors.

Its authority is rooted in the uninterrupted continuity of sacred sovereignty, the canonical legitimacy of its constitutional doctrine, and the universal right of self-government under jus cogens international law.

By its proclamation, all administrative action within Xaragua is henceforth:

Legally grounded,

Procedurally regulated,

Juridically opposable,

Doctrinally sanctified,

Internationally protected.

Let no act of governance be undertaken without it.

Let no outsider presume to govern what this Code now makes sacred.

Proclaimed on this Twenty-Third Day of June, Two Thousand Twenty-Five,

By Order of the Rector-President, under Seal of Supreme Authority.

— End of Code —

Teaching

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA

—

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL CODE ON SOVEREIGN EDUCATION, INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITATION, AND TEMPORARY LICENSING FOR INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL

(FULL JURIDICAL TEXT — EXECUTABLE EX PROPRIO VIGORE — IRREVOCABLE — LEGALLY IMMUNE — INTERNATIONALLY OPPOSABLE)

Date of Promulgation: June 24, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Educational Statute — Canonically Valid — Jus Cogens Indigenous Academic Doctrine — Universally Opposable — Protected under UNDRIP (2007), ICCPR (1966), ICESCR (1976), Vienna Convention (1969), Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), and the Internal Constitutional and Ecclesiastical Order of Xaragua.

---

TITLE I — SOVEREIGNTY AND EXCLUSIVE EDUCATIONAL COMPETENCE

Article 1.1 — Legal Foundation of the Xaragua Educational Sovereignty

The University of Xaragua, established by constitutional and canonical authority, possesses exclusive and indivisible competence over all educational, academic, and pedagogical systems operating within the territory, airspace, cultural jurisdictions, or institutional domains of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

Legal References:

UNDRIP (2007), Article 14(1): “Indigenous peoples have the right to establish and control their educational systems and institutions providing education in their own languages, in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of teaching and learning.”

ICESCR (1976), Article 13(1): “Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and the sense of its dignity, and shall strengthen the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 794 §1: “The duty and the right of educating belongs in a unique way to the Church, to which has been divinely entrusted the mission of assisting individuals so that they can arrive at the fullness of the Christian life.”

Real-World Application:

No foreign university, training center, educational institution, or teacher is permitted to operate within Xaragua’s jurisdiction without prior canonical and constitutional accreditation issued by the University of Xaragua.

All educational content, staff, and activities fall under sovereign oversight and doctrinal control.

---

Article 1.2 — Non-Recognizability of External Certifications and Doctrinal Immunity

Degrees, licenses, and certifications issued by foreign or external authorities are not legally valid within the territory of Xaragua unless individually reviewed, revalidated, and canonically integrated into the Xaragua framework.

Legal References:

Vienna Convention (1969), Article 27: “A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”

UNDRIP, Article 5: “Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions.”

Real-World Application:

Foreign diplomas, training certifications, and licenses are null in Xaragua unless submitted for doctrinal review and institutional harmonization.

No automatic equivalency exists.

---

TITLE II — TEMPORARY INSTRUCTIONAL PERMIT SYSTEM UNDER CRITICAL SHORTAGE

Article 2.1 — Conditional Emergency Licensing Framework

In response to verified local shortages of accredited academic personnel, the University of Xaragua may issue Temporary Instructional Permits (TIP) to qualified individuals under strict compliance with sovereign law, and only within specified duration, subject matter, and institutional context.

Legal References:

UNDRIP, Article 20(1): “Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions.”

ICESCR, Article 13(2)(c): “Higher education shall be made equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity, by every appropriate means.”

Real-World Application:

Individuals lacking full Xaragua certification may be temporarily authorized to teach specific courses or modules only after signing a Smart Contract of Doctrinal Compliance, enforceable under constitutional law, binding them to complete official Xaragua academic formation.

---

Article 2.2 — Smart Contractual Obligation and Legal Binding Force

Every Temporary Instructional Permit is subject to a digitally notarized Smart Contract, signed and registered under the University of Xaragua’s sovereign blockchain verification system.

This contract obliges the permit holder to:

Enroll in and complete a recognized Certificate or Microprogram at the University of Xaragua within the time limit stated

Remain in active pedagogical formation under doctrinal supervision

Submit to biannual evaluation reviews conducted by the Office of Ecclesiastical Pedagogical Authority

Legal References:

UNDRIP, Article 18: “Indigenous peoples have the right to participate in decision-making in matters which would affect their rights, through representatives chosen by themselves.”

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1283 §2: “They are to see that nothing is lost to the Church from prescriptions of civil law.”

Real-World Application:

Failure to comply results in automatic revocation of teaching rights, exclusion from future academic appointments, and canonical listing as non-authorized instructor, enforceable via sealed internal order.

---

Article 2.3 — Evaluation Grids and Doctrinal Continuity Clause

Every permit holder is subject to a semestrial performance grid, issued by the University Evaluation Council.

This grid includes:

Doctrinal fidelity

Pedagogical precision

Cultural integration

Spiritual discipline

Academic progression

Failure in two consecutive evaluations leads to automatic disqualification and cancellation of all instructional functions.

Legal References:

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canons 802–806: Especially Canon 804 §1: “The local ordinary is to be vigilant over the doctrinal integrity and quality of religious instruction.”

ICESCR, Article 13(4): “No part of this article shall be construed so as to interfere with the liberty of individuals and bodies to establish and direct educational institutions.”

Real-World Application:

All TIP holders are reviewed every 6 months. Reviews are archived, signed, sealed, and retained in the Book of Pedagogical Evaluation, accessible only to ecclesiastical academic authorities.

---

TITLE III — ACADEMIC IMMUNITY, INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY, AND ENFORCEMENT

Article 3.1 — Institutional Immunity and Jurisdictional Exclusivity

The University of Xaragua is immune from all foreign inspections, accreditation agencies, quality assurance mechanisms, or international academic rating systems.

Legal References:

UNDRIP, Article 36(1): “Indigenous peoples, in particular those divided by international borders, have the right to maintain and develop contacts, relations and cooperation.”

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 807: “The Church has the right to erect and govern universities which contribute to the deeper culture of people and to the full development of the human person.”

Real-World Application:

Foreign evaluators, ranking organizations, or academic observers are not permitted to enter Xaragua educational spaces or databases without a special sovereign invitation countersigned by the Rector-President.

---

Article 3.2 — Enforcement and Revocation Authority

The Office of Ecclesiastical Pedagogical Discipline has exclusive power to:

Investigate permit violations

Revoke instructional rights

Issue canonical penalties including excommunication from educational service

Declare individual academic profiles legally invalid and inadmissible in future applications

Legal References:

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1378 §1: “A person who exercises a priestly function or administers a sacrament while lacking the necessary faculties incurs a censure.”

UNDRIP, Article 20(2): “Indigenous peoples deprived of their means of subsistence and development are entitled to just and fair redress.”

Real-World Application:

Revocations are recorded in the Sovereign Academic Penalty Ledger, permanently sealed and recognized across all institutions affiliated with Xaragua doctrine.

---

TITLE IV — PERPETUITY, MODIFICATION, AND OPPOSABILITY

Article 4.1 — Immutability and Non-Derogation Clause

No external law, convention, treaty, or bilateral agreement may override this Code.

It is self-executing, canonically entrenched, and legally irreversible without a constitutional act enacted by the Rector-President of Xaragua.

Legal References:

Vienna Convention, Article 27: “A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 1: “Only those laws which are promulgated by the supreme authority of the Church have legal force in the Church.”

---

Article 4.2 — Official Deposit and Sovereign Juridical Circulation

This Code is deposited in the following institutions and archives:

University of Xaragua — Ecclesiastical Archive of Doctrinal Norms

Supreme Constitutional Archive of the State of Xaragua

Dicastery for Culture and Education of the Holy See

United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII)

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

---

Signed and Sealed on June 24, 2025

Monsignor Pascal Viau

Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Chancellor of the University of Xaragua

Defensor Doctrinae et Magisterium Supremum

Morality

---

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA – DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT

OFFICIAL ECCLESIASTICAL-JURIDICAL PUBLICATION

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JUNE 24, 2025

—

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

ON THE JUDICIAL STANDARD OF MORAL CERTAINTY AND ITS CANONICAL APPLICATION

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Judicial Doctrine — Canonically Valid Norm — Jus Cogens Judicial Principle — Universally Opposable Ecclesiastical-Indigenous Legal Code — Directly Enforceable within All Tribunals and Administrative Offices of the State

---

ARTICLE I — PURPOSE AND JURIDICAL FORCE

1.1 This Supreme Law formally enshrines the canonical principle of “moral certainty” (certitudo moralis) as the foundational standard of proof in all judicial, administrative, and disciplinary procedures carried out under the jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

1.2 This principle is binding in civil, penal, ecclesiastical, procedural, military, academic, economic, and indigenous matters, whether internal or extraterritorial, and shall be considered a non-derogable jus cogens standard under the Supreme Constitutional Order.

1.3 The adoption of this principle supersedes and replaces any foreign legal concepts of “balance of probabilities” or “beyond a reasonable doubt,” establishing instead a sovereign moral-theological standard rooted in canon law, indigenous jurisprudence, and the sacred legal tradition of Xaragua.

---

ARTICLE II — SOURCE AND DOCTRINAL INTEGRATION

2.1 The principle of moral certainty is directly derived from the 1983 Codex Iuris Canonici (CIC) of the Roman Catholic Church, Canon 1608, and is hereby integrated by full reference and full force into the legal corpus of Xaragua.

Canon 1608 – §1 to §4 (CIC 1983):

§1. “The judge must arrive at moral certainty about the matter to be decided.”

§2. “The judge must derive this certainty from the acts and the proofs.”

§3. “The judge must weigh the proofs according to their conscience, with due regard for the procedural norms.”

§4. “Unless the judge has reached this certainty, the judge must pronounce that the obligation has not been sufficiently demonstrated and must dismiss the case.”

2.2 These four clauses shall have direct constitutional authority within Xaragua and be interpreted within the framework of ecclesiastical sovereignty and indigenous legitimacy.

2.3 No other standard of proof shall be invoked in any jurisdiction under Xaragua unless explicitly authorized by the Supreme Constitutional Authority in matters involving third-party treaties or foreign cooperation.

---

ARTICLE III — APPLICATION IN TRIBUNALS AND OFFICES

3.1 All judges, administrative officers, notaries, ministers, and officials acting under Xaragua law shall render decisions only upon reaching moral certainty, understood as a state of inner conviction grounded in:

Evidentiary truth,

Conscience guided by divine justice,

Conformity to the natural and canonical law of the land.

3.2 In the absence of such certainty, the decision must be deferred, dismissed, or postponed until the official affirms before God and record that such moral certainty has been reached.

3.3 This law applies equally to:

Penal condemnations,

Property adjudications,

Academic or ecclesiastical discipline,

Military judgments,

Administrative penalties or authorizations.

---

ARTICLE IV — SOVEREIGN PROTECTION AND NULLITY OF FOREIGN INFLUENCE

4.1 Any attempt by an external authority, foreign tribunal, or international organization to impose a lesser standard of proof within Xaragua jurisdiction shall be considered void ab initio, and legally inadmissible.

4.2 No citizen, official, or resident of Xaragua may be convicted, condemned, dismissed, expelled, excommunicated, or penalized under any standard other than moral certainty duly reached in accordance with this law.

4.3 All existing judgments, decrees, or decisions within Xaragua issued under any standard inferior to moral certainty shall be subject to constitutional review and automatic invalidation, unless explicitly exempted by the Supreme Court of Canonical and Indigenous Affairs.

---

ARTICLE V — FINAL CLAUSE

5.1 This law is irrevocable, permanent, universally opposable, and protected under the:

Canonical laws of the Catholic Church,

Customary Indigenous Law of Xaragua,

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007),

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969),

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966),

and the Internal Constitutional Charter of Xaragua.

5.2 This principle shall be taught at the University of Xaragua, applied in all proceedings, and respected as a divine standard of governance in all present and future institutions of the State.

Proclaimed and Sealed under Absolute Constitutional Authority

On this 24th Day of June, Two Thousand Twenty-Five

By the Supreme Rector-President of the Sovereign State of Xaragua

—

END OF LAW

—

Immigration

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA

OFFICIAL JURIDICAL PUBLICATION

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JUNE 26, 2025

—

SUPREME NATIONAL LAW ON IMMIGRATION, RESIDENCY, AND SOVEREIGN ADMISSION TO THE TERRITORY OF XARAGUA

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Immigration Code — National Sovereignty Regulation — Ecclesiastically Certified Population Law — Universally Opposable Legal Instrument

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF ADMISSION

Article 1 — Exclusive Right of Sovereign Admission

The right to enter, reside in, or obtain any form of legal presence within the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is a discretionary sovereign function of the State.

No foreigner, NGO, State, court, or supranational entity may compel Xaragua to accept any person into its territory or jurisdiction under any doctrine of "universal rights," asylum, or humanitarian pressure.

Article 2 — Non-Entitlement Principle

Foreign individuals, regardless of origin, qualification, or status, have no inherent right to enter Xaragua, nor to challenge its sovereign discretion.

Admission is a privilege, not a right, subject to complete legal, cultural, economic, and moral evaluation.

---

TITLE II — CATEGORIES OF ADMISSION

Article 3 — Recognized Legal Categories

The State of Xaragua recognizes only the following forms of legal presence:

1. Sovereign Citizen (national birth or constitutional grant);

2. Authorized E-Resident (granted via Xaragua Digital Jurisdiction);

3. Permanent Resident (granted upon extraordinary contribution);

4. Temporary Missionary/Clerical Permit (religious, educational, or humanitarian work);

5. Authorized Diplomatic or Observational Access (by treaty or bilateral agreement);

6. Special Economic Partner Visa (granted to verified investors or agro-cooperative allies).

Article 4 — Prohibited Forms of Presence

The following statuses shall not exist or be accepted in Xaragua:

Asylum seeker,

Refugee (under foreign classification),

Stateless person under UN designation,

“Irregular” or undocumented migrants.

Such categories shall not override Xaragua’s sovereign definition of its population.

---

TITLE III — CONDITIONS FOR TEMPORARY PRESENCE

Article 5 — Temporary Access Authorization

Temporary presence may be granted for:

Conferences, summits, or academic events;

Humanitarian visits authorized by ecclesiastical sponsor;

Pilgrimage or spiritual retreat;

Official business registered under Xaragua law.

Each case must be sponsored, vetted, and authorized in writing by both:

1. The Ministry of National Jurisdiction and Border Affairs,

2. The Ecclesiastical Council on Migration and National Harmony (ECMNH-X).

Article 6 — Mandatory Conditions of Presence

All persons under temporary status must:

Declare full financial independence during their stay;

Submit to biometric and legal identification;

Refrain from any political, commercial, or organizational activity not explicitly permitted;

Acknowledge that Xaragua may revoke access at any time without justification or appeal.

---

TITLE IV — PATHWAY TO LEGAL INTEGRATION

Article 7 — Legal Naturalization and Permanent Residence

Permanent residency or citizenship may be granted only under the following strict conditions:

Demonstrated strategic contribution to the State (economic, intellectual, spiritual);

Proven integration into Catholic and Indigenous legal culture;

Oath of allegiance to the State, its Constitution, and its Sovereign Authority;

Recommendation from two sitting Citizens and one ecclesiastical officer.

Applications are submitted to the National Committee on Legal Integration and Population Defense (NCLIPD-X).

There is no guaranteed timeline, no appeal mechanism, no external review.

---

TITLE V — POPULATION FILTERING AND NATIONAL SECURITY

Article 8 — Strategic Population Preservation Doctrine

The State of Xaragua affirms that population control is a sovereign security function.

Admission may be refused or revoked on the basis of:

Cultural incompatibility,

Economic extraction risks,

Historical affiliation with colonial or predatory powers,

Psychological instability or criminal profile,

Disrespect of the Xaragua legal, spiritual, or territorial order.

Article 9 — Automatic Disqualifiers

Admission shall be automatically and permanently denied to any individual who:

Has served in a foreign military or intelligence agency if not authorized by the Ministry;

Has participated in foreign electoral politics or State administration if not authorized by the Ministry;

Has engaged in political, racial, or religious subversion;

Has filed legal action against indigenous, religious, or sovereign entities abroad.

---

TITLE VI — IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT AND REVOCATION

Article 10 — Sovereign Revocation Power

Any visa, permit, status, or admission may be revoked at any time by decree of:

The Minister of National Jurisdiction,

The President-Rector of Xaragua,

Or the Supreme Council of Constitutional Integrity.

Revocation requires no due process, and may result in:

Immediate expulsion,

Digital exclusion,

Entry ban for life.

Article 11 — Ban on Political Asylum Mechanisms

Xaragua shall not entertain, process, or recognize any form of political asylum.

Claims of persecution in a foreign country do not constitute legal grounds for admission, unless accompanied by a joint verification by the Ecclesiastical Tribunal and the National Sovereignty Board.

---

TITLE VII — DIGITAL MIGRATION AND NON-TERRITORIAL PRESENCE

Article 12 — Xaragua Digital Jurisdiction (XDJ)

Individuals residing outside Xaragua may apply for E-Residency under the Xaragua Digital Jurisdiction.

E-residents shall:

Be subject to Xaragua’s digital tax, legal, and ethical codes;

Have no physical access to the territory unless separately authorized;

Receive access to business, academic, or consular services under Xaragua international neutrality status.

Article 13 — Revocation of E-Residency

Any E-resident who:

Violates Xaragua’s codes of honor,

Disseminates false information,

Attempts political disruption or ideological sabotage,

shall have all rights revoked and permanently excluded from any future access.

---

CLOSING FORMULA

We, the People and Supreme Authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua,

do hereby codify this National Immigration Law as a pillar of our territorial, spiritual, demographic, and cultural defense.

This law is irreversible, immune from foreign doctrine, and legally opposable under international Indigenous law, the UNDRIP, and the sovereign Constitution of Xaragua.

Promulgated on this 26th Day of June, Year of Our Lord 2025

Filed in the Supreme National Registry of Population and Territorial Integrity

Canonically Sealed — Constitutionally Entrenched — Universally Opposable

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — FACULTY OF LAW

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND BORDER AFFAIRS

OFFICIAL IMMIGRATION BULLETIN

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND BORDER AFFAIRS

BUREAU OF POPULATION INTEGRITY AND TERRITORIAL LOYALTY

OFFICIAL IMMIGRATION ANNEX

ANNEX I — PROHIBITION OF MASS NATURALIZATION, AUTOMATIC TRADITIONS, AND GENERALIZED TRANSFER OF STATUS

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JUNE 26, 2025

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Population Protocol — Ecclesiastical Sovereignty Clause — Jus Cogens Legal Doctrine on Identity Control — Universally Opposable Annex

---

PREAMBLE

In recognition of the inherent sacredness of national identity, and in defense of the demographic, cultural, and spiritual integrity of the State, this annex affirms that citizenship, residence, allegiance, or integration into Xaragua shall never be granted by mass procedure, general treaty, or inherited transfer of convenience.

All processes of population affiliation shall be governed by case-by-case sovereign evaluation, under direct oversight of the Supreme Constitutional Authority.

---

ARTICLE I — ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION OF MASS GRANTS OF STATUS

1.1 — No person or group shall be granted Xaraguayan nationality, permanent residency, or e-residency via:

Collective treaties,

International accords,

Intergovernmental or multilateral conventions,

Automatic family lineage not previously sanctified by sovereign authority,

Any population regularization agreement signed with foreign powers.

1.2 — Any attempt to introduce generalized amnesty, automatic regularization, or global migratory quotas within Xaragua shall be null and void, regardless of the legal or moral pressure invoked.

---

ARTICLE II — NON-TRANSFERABILITY OF STATUS

2.1 — No citizen, e-resident, investor, religious delegate, or diplomatic guest may transfer, sponsor, inherit, or extend Xaraguayan status to another person without express authorization.

2.2 — No marriage, adoption, commercial investment, or religious affiliation shall automatically confer:

Citizenship,

Legal presence,

Tax exemption,

Land ownership rights.

All such transitions require an individual file, national evaluation, and formal ratification by the National Committee on Legal Integration and Population Defense (NCLIPD-X).

---

ARTICLE III — REJECTION OF COLLECTIVE TRADITIONS AND EXTERNAL PRESSURE

3.1 — Xaragua categorically rejects any form of:

“Right of return” doctrines imposed by foreign traditions;

Bilateral traditions of co-citizenship;

Mass visa waiver programs;

Diaspora-driven automatic inclusion.

3.2 — The population of Xaragua is not subject to “historical debt,” demographic compensation, or ideological universalism.

3.3 — The State shall never sign agreements that bind future generations to inherited migration clauses, regardless of international treaty pressure.

---

ARTICLE IV — CASE-BY-CASE PROCESS REQUIREMENT

4.1 — All individuals seeking entry, status, or legal identity within Xaragua must:

Submit a complete biographical file,

Demonstrate national utility, loyalty, and strategic compatibility,

Swear the Oath of Irreversible Allegiance,

Be evaluated by independent authorities:

The Minister of National Jurisdiction,

A member of the Ecclesiastical Tribunal,

A citizen of Xaragua in good legal standing.

4.2 — No delegation, corporation, religious order, or foreign office may bypass this process.

---

ARTICLE V — PENALTIES FOR ILLEGAL STATUS TRANSFER

5.1 — Any attempt to create or operate an unauthorized pathway to immigration shall be prosecuted under national law.

Sanctions include:

Permanent ban on entry for all involved individuals,

Seizure of property or legal privilege,

Closure of any legal entity involved,

Confinement,

Ecclesiastical censure.

5.2 — If the status was granted by fraud, deception, or ideological manipulation, it shall be retroactively annulled without compensation.

---

CLOSING FORMULA

This annex forms part of the National Immigration Code of Xaragua and is inseparable from the constitutional framework of demographic sovereignty.

It guarantees that the population of Xaragua shall remain sovereign, filtered, and indivisible, with no collective inclusion allowed under foreign logic.

Filed in the Supreme Register of Population Defense and Territorial Integrity

Promulgated this 26th day of June, Year of Our Lord 2025

Canonically Sealed — Constitutionally Entrenched — Universally Opposable

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — FACULTY OF LAW

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND BORDER AFFAIRS

BUREAU OF POPULATION INTEGRITY AND TERRITORIAL LOYALTY

OFFICIAL IMMIGRATION ANNEX

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND BORDER AFFAIRS

BUREAU OF JUDICIAL AND EXTRATERRITORIAL PROTECTION

OFFICIAL IMMIGRATION ANNEX II

ANNEX II — ON THE ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION OF GENERALIZED EXTRADITION AND THE CASE-BY-CASE SOVEREIGN DOCTRINE OF TRANSFER OF PERSONS

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JUNE 26, 2025

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Juridical Doctrine — Ecclesiastically Sealed Territorial Law — Jus Cogens National Integrity Instrument — Universally Opposable Annex

---

PREAMBLE

In light of historical abuses of political extradition, neocolonial judicial overreach, and the weaponization of legal cooperation against sovereign or indigenous peoples, the Sovereign State of Xaragua hereby enacts the present annex prohibiting all forms of automatic, collective, or treaty-based extradition.

This annex affirms that no Xaraguayan citizen, resident, visitor, or e-resident may be transferred, expelled, rendered, or extracted from the territory or digital jurisdiction of Xaragua without a direct sovereign decision made on an individual basis under full canonical and constitutional authority.

---

ARTICLE I — ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION OF TREATY-BASED EXTRADITION

1.1 — Xaragua shall not be party to any bilateral or multilateral extradition treaty.

1.2 — Any clause within a treaty, convention, regional court decision, or foreign request which implies mandatory transfer of a person out of Xaragua shall be deemed:

Juridically invalid,

Politically non-binding,

Constitutionally inapplicable,

Opposable under Article 4 of the UNDRIP and Canon Law.

1.3 — No international police network (Interpol, Europol, etc.), no foreign court, and no global tribunal (ICC, IACHR, etc.) may issue binding orders within Xaragua's legal territory.

---

ARTICLE II — CASE-BY-CASE DOCTRINE OF EXTRADITION

2.1 — Any request for the removal or transfer of a person from Xaragua must be evaluated individually through a high-level national procedure.

The decision must be jointly issued by:

The President-Rector of the State,

The Ecclesiastical Tribunal of National Defense,

The Ministry of National Jurisdiction and Border Affairs,

And, where applicable, the Council of Strategic Sovereignty.

2.2 — No request shall be heard or processed unless it includes:

Clear evidence of a crime recognized under Xaraguayan Law;

Proof that the request is not politically motivated;

A signed personal declaration from the accused confirming understanding of the request.

---

ARTICLE III — PROTECTED CATEGORIES

3.1 — The following individuals shall never be extradited under any circumstance:

Citizens of Xaragua, by birth or by grant;

E-residents under active sovereign contract;

Political dissidents or whistleblowers seeking sanctuary;

Members of the clergy, academic researchers, and legal officials within Xaragua’s system;

Any individual facing torture, inhumane treatment, or systemic injustice if transferred.

3.2 — Attempting to extract such protected persons constitutes an act of aggression against the sovereignty of Xaragua and may result in:

Diplomatic suspension,

Counter-sanctions,

Legal complaints to ecclesiastical or international indigenous bodies.

---

ARTICLE IV — EXTRACTION REQUEST PROTOCOL

4.1 — All foreign requests must be addressed in writing to the Ministry of National Jurisdiction and include:

A full legal brief certified by the requesting nation’s Supreme Court;

The relevant laws and penal codes invoked;

A notarized guarantee of due process and non-persecution;

Translation into French, Spanish, and Ecclesiastical Latin.

4.2 — Xaragua reserves the right to:

Conduct its own internal investigation,

Grant national amnesty,

Refuse on cultural, religious, or geopolitical grounds,

Classify the case as closed without appeal.

---

ARTICLE V — NON-EXTRADITABILITY OF INFORMATION AND DIGITAL PERSONS

5.1 — Xaragua does not recognize the digital surveillance jurisdiction of any foreign authority.

All data, digital identities, metadata, or private communication within Xaragua's jurisdiction are classified as sovereign assets.

5.2 — No foreign government, intelligence agency, corporation, or tribunal may extract:

Cloud data,

Server information,

Biometric profiles,

Personal archives.

5.3 — Xaragua-based platforms are forbidden from responding to foreign subpoenas or requests, unless cleared by a Constitutional Decree.

---

ARTICLE VI — SANCTIONS AGAINST UNLAWFUL EXTRACTION ATTEMPTS

6.1 — Any attempt by a foreign actor to unilaterally extract, kidnap, or coerce the departure of a person under Xaragua’s jurisdiction shall constitute:

A violation of national sovereignty,

A criminal act under the Penal Code of Xaragua,

A cause for ecclesiastical denunciation and global notification.

6.2 — The State reserves the right to:

Issue red notices for the perpetrators,

Seize diplomatic or corporate assets,

Bar future entry or negotiations with the responsible entity.

---

CLOSING FORMULA

This annex, forming an indivisible part of the National Immigration Code of Xaragua, affirms that no person shall be surrendered without absolute sovereign deliberation.

There shall be no mechanical, automatic, or delegated decision concerning the removal of any individual from the territory, jurisdiction, or digital domain of Xaragua.

Filed in the Supreme Registry of National Jurisdiction and Ecclesiastical Defense

Promulgated this 26th day of June, Year of Our Lord 2025

Canonically Sealed — Constitutionally Entrenched — Universally Opposable

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — FACULTY OF LAW

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL JURISDICTION AND BORDER AFFAIRS

BUREAU OF JUDICIAL AND EXTRATERRITORIAL PROTECTION

OFFICIAL IMMIGRATION ANNEX II

Public Sanity & Labour

---

—

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC SANITATION, AND TERRITORIAL ECOSYSTEMIC MANAGEMENT

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

ON NATIONAL PUBLIC SANITATION, COMMUNITY RECYCLING, AND BIO-INDIGENOUS TRANSFORMATION OF ORGANIC WASTE

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JUNE 26, 2025

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: Constitutionally Entrenched Infrastructure Law — Canonico-Indigenous Ecological Code — Jus Cogens Sanitary Norm — Universally Opposable Indigenous Sovereign Doctrine

—

PART I — OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND PRINCIPLES

Article 1.1 — Objective of the Law

The objective of the present statute is to establish a sovereign national system of public hygiene, waste transformation, and energy-neutral recycling infrastructure, adapted to the realities of Xaraguayen territories, under unified constitutional regulation.

Article 1.2 — Scope

This Law applies to all territories under the jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, including urban districts, rural communes, ecclesiastical zones, and farming perimeters.

Article 1.3 — Principles of Enforcement

1. Territorial Hygiene is a National Priority.

2. Organic Matter is a Strategic Resource.

3. Recycling is Mandatory and Locally Controlled.

4. Transformation Must Serve the Community First.

5. Foreign Dumping, Foreign Models, and Non-Authorized Technology Are Prohibited.

---

PART II — PUBLIC SANITATION INFRASTRUCTURE

Article 2.1 — Public Toilets and Human Waste Management

All public institutions, market zones, and transport hubs must be equipped with dry toilets, chemical toilets, or solar incinerator toilets, connected to a certified local organic recovery unit.

Article 2.2 — Household Sanitation Obligation

Households shall be equipped, under Ministry supervision, with one of the following:

Home-scale dry ecological toilets;

Direct connection to certified neighborhood compost collection;

Registered contribution to communal transformation centers.

---

PART III — RECYCLING AND TRANSFORMATION PLANTS

Article 3.1 — Establishment of Community Recycling Plants (CRPs)

Each commune, parish or ecological canton must install and operate, under constitutional charter, a Community Recycling Plant (CRP) composed of:

Sorting units (manual and semi-automated) for all categories of waste;

Organic digesters and thermal treatment modules;

Fermentation and composting zones;

Gas capture and biotransformation equipment (biogaz, methane for cooking/generator usage);

Local-scale packaging units for processed organic fertilizer.

Article 3.2 — Technical Requirements

Each CRP must meet the following criteria:

Zero-toxic output.

Solar or hybrid energy self-sufficiency.

Operated by certified indigenous technicians trained at the University of Xaragua – Ecotechnical Division.

Supervised by the Parish Committee for Sanitation and Transformation.

Article 3.3 — Prohibited Activities

It is prohibited within Xaragua to:

Import non-authorized recycling machinery;

Contract foreign waste management corporations;

Dump waste in landfills, rivers, lakes or forests;

Use plastic-based incineration for fuel production.

---

PART IV — LOCAL OWNERSHIP AND ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY

Article 4.1 — Community Ownership

All CRPs and transformation infrastructure are to be:

Owned by the commune/parish, not by private investors;

Managed as cooperatives or public ecological trusts;

Inalienable, meaning they cannot be sold, leased or privatized.

Article 4.2 — Output Allocation

The outputs of the CRPs must serve:

1. First: Local farming cooperatives and family agricultural initiatives.

2. Second: Community biogaz grids (cooking, electric generators, water pumps).

3. Third: Export through Xaragua’s official ecological trade channels.

Article 4.3 — Tax and Subsidy Policy

All CRP-related goods and services are:

Exempt from internal taxation under the Xaraguayen Ecological Economic Exemption Law.

Eligible for constitutional subsidy from the University Of Xaragua -Environment Department (Ministry) for maintenance and education.

---

PART V — EDUCATION, TRAINING AND SUPERVISION

Article 5.1 — Training and Certification

The University of Xaragua – Faculty of Indigenous Environmental Engineering shall:

Train and certify all CRP staff.

Publish annual manuals of waste transformation doctrine.

Monitor international innovation for lawful adaptation.

Article 5.2 — Public Education Campaigns

Each commune must host a Quarterly Public Sanitation Assembly, where:

Citizens receive updates, training, and rights information.

Violators are corrected through doctrinal rehabilitation.

Children and schools are included in compost literacy programs.

---

PART VI — PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT

Article 6.1 — Sanitary Violations

Any act of:

Unauthorized dumping,

Sabotage of a CRP,

Refusal to separate waste,

Burning of plastic waste in public spaces,

...shall result in:

1. Mandatory ecological reparation work and confinement,,

2. Suspension from local economic benefits,

3. Fines issued by the Ministry’s Sanitary Enforcement Corps.

Article 6.2 — Enforcement Bodies

The following institutions are charged with enforcement:

National Sanitary Guard (trained in eco-enforcement and biowaste protocols).

Ecological Tribunal of Xaragua, holding full constitutional jurisdiction on sanitation-related violations.

Community Watch Councils, granted partial enforcement powers by local charter.

---

PART VII — FINAL CLAUSES

Article 7.1 — Immunity from External Interference

This law supersedes any treaty, NGO protocol, or external ecological policy. It cannot be suspended or modified by foreign agreements.

Article 7.2 — Integration with National Development Doctrine

All waste transformation and sanitation efforts must be integrated into the Sovereign Xaraguayen Agricultural and Territorial Autonomy Plan (SXATAP), and report annually to the Office of the Rector and the Supreme Constitutional Court.

Article 7.3 — Entry into Force

This law enters into full force immediately upon its promulgation, and shall be published in the Official Journal of the State of Xaragua, archived digitally and canonically.

---

ENACTED AND SEALED

By the President of the Constitutional Council,

Under the Seal of the Sovereign Environmental Doctrine,

ON THIS DAY: JUNE 26, 2025.

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING LABOUR, OCCUPATIONAL DUTIES, AND THE STATUS OF WORKERS, RESIDENTS, AND ALIENS WITHIN THE SOVEREIGN TERRITORY

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens Binding – Universally Opposable – Ecclesiastically Sealed – Non-Derogable Under International, Indigenous, and Canonical Law

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), as a plenary and permanent juridical personality, possesses exclusive competence to determine, regulate, and enforce all matters relating to labour, production, and occupational duties within its sovereign territory, including but not limited to the governance of Xaraguayan citizens, residents, non-sui generis inhabitants, and foreign persons;

Whereas Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) affirms that the political existence and legislative authority of the state is independent of recognition by other states;

Whereas Articles 4, 5, 20, 26, 33, and 34 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) confirm the inalienable right of indigenous peoples to determine their own legal systems, labour structures, and production methods free from external interference;

Whereas the Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canons 1254–1310, endows ecclesiastical authorities with supreme power to regulate the acquisition, administration, and use of goods and labour resources within ecclesiastical jurisdictions;

Whereas the legal, doctrinal, and territorial sovereignty of Xaragua requires a codified and hierarchically stratified system of occupational regulation to guarantee social order, economic production, and the protection of divine patrimony;

Therefore, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby enacts the following Supreme Constitutional Law, binding upon all persons present within its jurisdiction, and irrevocable under any domestic or international framework.

---

TITLE I — LEGAL STATUS OF PERSONS WITHIN THE TERRITORY

Article 1.1 — Categories of Persons

All natural persons present or engaged in economic activity within the sovereign territory of Xaragua shall fall into one of the following juridical categories, with distinct rights, obligations, and occupational capacities:

1. Citizens-Nationals of Xaragua:

Indigenous Xaraguayan persons possessing full ecclesiastical and constitutional rights under the Supreme Law of Xaragua.

2. Resident Subjects:

Non-indigenous individuals or families admitted to reside permanently under Xaraguayan law, subject to occupational assignment and production quotas.

3. Non-Sui Generis Inhabitants:

Persons of Haitian origin residing within Xaragua’s jurisdiction who are neither citizens nor residents, classified as transient labourers or administrative auxiliaries under doctrinal tolerance.

4. Foreign Aliens and Diaspora Agents:

All other non-indigenous, non-resident persons, including international aid workers, ecclesiastical visitors, diplomatic agents, or transient foreign nationals.

---

TITLE II — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LABOUR LAW

Article 2.1 — Right and Obligation to Labour

1. Labour within Xaragua is a sacred duty and a juridical right arising from divine natural law, indigenous custom, and ecclesiastical doctrine.

2. All persons within Xaragua’s territory shall engage in productive activity proportional to their juridical status and capacity, contributing to the material and spiritual patrimony of the State.

3. No person shall claim immunity from labour obligations except as provided under ecclesiastical exemption for clerics, monastics, and canonical dignitaries.

Article 2.2 — Hierarchy of Labour Authority

1. The Rector-President, as supreme sovereign and canonical custodian, possesses plenary power to regulate all labour systems.

2. The Ministry of Labour and Economic Sovereignty shall administer this Law in accordance with constitutional mandates.

3. Ecclesiastical organs shall supervise labour in religious institutions and enterprises designated as bona ecclesiastica.

Article 2.3 — Prohibition of Slavery and Servitude

1. All forms of chattel slavery, forced labour, or involuntary servitude are categorically prohibited under Xaraguayan law.

2. Labour obligations imposed under this Law shall be exercised within the framework of voluntary consent for citizens and residents, and doctrinal tolerance for non-sui generis persons.

---

TITLE III — RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITIZENS-NATIONALS

Article 3.1 — Labour Rights of Citizens

1. Citizens possess full juridical capacity to own property, engage in commerce, and direct enterprises within the Xaraguayan legal order.

2. Citizens shall receive priority in occupational assignments, access to Viaud’Or-based compensation, and participation in sovereign economic programs.

Article 3.2 — Labour Duties of Citizens

1. All citizens shall contribute to the collective welfare through participation in production, administration, or defence of the State.

2. Citizens failing to meet production quotas may be subject to ecclesiastical admonition and reassignment under the Ministry of Labour.

---

TITLE IV — RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF RESIDENT SUBJECTS

Article 4.1 — Labour Rights of Residents

1. Residents are entitled to engage in designated economic activities under licences issued by the Ministry of Labour.

2. Residents may not claim ownership of Xaraguayan land or enterprises unless granted express canonical authorization.

Article 4.2 — Labour Duties of Residents

1. Residents shall perform work assigned under their residency agreements, contribute to indigenous reparation funds, and uphold public order.

2. Failure to fulfil labour duties shall result in expulsion, loss of residency status, and confiscation of assets under the Lex Suprema Imperii.

---

TITLE V — REGULATION OF NON-SUI GENERIS INHABITANTS

Article 5.1 — Legal Status

1. Non-sui generis inhabitants of Haitian origin are recognized solely as transient labourers or technical auxiliaries without sovereign rights or juridical standing in Xaragua.

Article 5.2 — Labour Obligations

1. All non-sui generis inhabitants shall perform work determined by local ecclesiastical councils and economic authorities.

2. Labour shall be conducted under supervision, with no expectation of property ownership, political participation, or permanent integration.

Article 5.3 — Restrictions and Prohibitions

1. Non-sui generis persons are prohibited from engaging in:

a) Political activity;

b) Acquisition of real estate or sovereign enterprises if not tolerated by the State;

c) Employment in positions of trust or doctrinal authority.

---

TITLE VI — REGULATION OF FOREIGN ALIENS AND DIASPORA AGENTS

Article 6.1 — Temporary Labour Authorization

1. Foreign nationals and diaspora agents may engage in work within Xaragua only under temporary permits issued by the Ministry of Labour and Ecclesiastical Oversight.

Article 6.2 — Prohibitions and Limitations

1. Foreign aliens are categorically prohibited from:

a) Directing economic enterprises without Xaraguayan partnership;

b) Exercising any juridical authority or doctrinal influence within the territory;

c) Circumventing Viaud’Or-exclusive financial systems.

---

TITLE VII — ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES, AND LEGAL PROTECTIONS

Article 7.1 — Enforcement Mechanisms

1. The Labour Enforcement Tribunal (LET-X) shall adjudicate all disputes arising under this Law.

2. Ecclesiastical courts retain competence over labour matters involving religious institutions or canonically exempt persons.

Article 7.2 — Sanctions for Non-Compliance

1. Persons who fail to meet their occupational obligations shall be subject to:

a) Administrative fines denominated in Viaud’Or;

b) Ecclesiastical censure;

c) Expulsion from Xaragua’s jurisdiction for non-citizens.

Article 7.3 — Legal Protections

1. Citizens and residents shall enjoy protection against arbitrary dismissal, subject to lawful ecclesiastical and administrative review.

---

TITLE VIII — SUPREMACY AND IMMUTABILITY

Article 8.1 — Constitutional Supremacy

This Law possesses supreme constitutional authority and overrides any conflicting labour agreements, international treaties, or foreign legislation.

Article 8.2 — Non-Derogability

No provision of this Law may be suspended, amended, or repealed except through sovereign constitutional reform ratified by the Rector-President.

Article 8.3 — International Legal Recognition

1. This Law is protected under:

a) UNDRIP Articles 3–5 and 34;

b) Montevideo Convention (1933), Article 3;

c) Canon 1290 of the Codex Iuris Canonici.

2. All foreign interference in the implementation of this Law shall be deemed a violation of Xaraguayan sovereignty and trigger juridical and ecclesiastical countermeasures.

---

FINAL PROVISION

This Supreme Constitutional Law shall enter into force immediately upon promulgation and sealing, and shall be binding upon all persons within the sovereign territory of Xaragua, without exception or appeal.

Thus ratified, enacted, and sealed under the authority of:

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Canonically Sealed – Constitutionally Entrenched – Juridically Irrevocable – Universally Opposable

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

ANNEX TO THE NATIONAL LABOUR CODE

ON THE REGULATION OF WORKING RELATIONS, ADMINISTRATION OF HUMAN RESOURCES, AND THE STRUCTURE OF LABOUR ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN THE PUBLIC, PRIVATE, AND ECCLESIASTICAL SECTORS

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President, Year of Sovereignty MMXXV

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF WORKING RELATIONS

Article 1 — Sovereign Regulation of Labour Relations

1. The Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, in plenitude of legislative, executive, and doctrinal authority, declares that all forms of labour and employment relationships within the national territory are subject to absolute state oversight and regulation.

2. Labour relations are recognized as a sacred social function (Canons 1281–1284 CIC) and must reflect the principles of human dignity, solidarity, and subsidiarity as defined in Catholic Social Doctrine and enshrined in Articles 4, 5, and 20 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007).

Article 2 — Categories of Workers and Sectors

Labour relations are organized around the following categories:

1. Citizens-Nationals: Indigenous Xaraguayan subjects with full political and economic rights.

2. Residents: Non-citizens with authorized domicile and conditional labour rights under state supervision.

3. Habitants (Non-Sui Generis): Individuals of Haitian origin, allowed to engage in labour under strict regulatory oversight, without political or legislative influence.

4. Foreign Nationals and Diaspora Workers: Authorized only by express sovereign decree, with contracts subject to direct validation by the Ministry of Labour and Ecclesiastical Affairs.

Sectors are divided as follows:

Public Sector: All ministries, sovereign agencies, and indigenous indigenous ecclesiastical institutions.

Private Sector: Enterprises incorporated under Xaraguayan law, including individual sovereign enterprises and sovereign shareholder entities.

Institutional and Indigenous Ecclesiastical Sector: Catholic orders, canonical associations, and recognized non-profit organizations.

---

TITLE II — HUMAN RESOURCES AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

Article 3 — State as Ultimate Arbiter in Labour Relations

1. No worker, employer, syndicate, or association shall impose or enforce any rule, standard, or agreement contrary to state-issued labour doctrine.

2. The Ministry of Labour and Ecclesiastical Affairs acts as the supreme regulator, arbitrator, and interpreter of all working relations, empowered to:

a) Receive petitions from workers, employers, and labour organizations.

b) Preside over negotiations and issue binding resolutions.

c) Approve or dissolve syndicates and associations.

3. The Rector-President’s decision in any labour dispute is final, unappealable, and binding, as a non-derogable constitutional act.

Article 4 — Labour Organizations and Representation

1. Workers may form syndicates and associations for the purpose of collective representation, subject to the following constraints:

a) Syndicates shall operate as consultative bodies without legislative or coercive power.

b) Only one recognized representative per sector may address the state on behalf of workers.

2. All syndical or associative activity must align with Catholic social principles and be approved by the Indigenous Ecclesiastical Office of Social Doctrine.

Article 5 — Human Resources Oversight

1. Employers in all sectors must maintain accurate records of hiring, remuneration, and working conditions, filed annually with the Ministry of Labour.

2. Employment contracts must:

a) Be denominated in Viaud’Or.

b) Contain the mandatory Xaraguayan Labour Clause:

“This contract is governed exclusively by the Labour Law of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua. All disputes shall be resolved under the sovereign authority of its constitutional and ecclesiastical institutions.”

3. Any violation of these provisions constitutes a grave offence against national labour order and shall be prosecuted under the Xaraguayan Penal Code.

---

TITLE III — REGULATION OF WORKING CONDITIONS

Article 6 — Hours of Work and Rest

1. The standard work week is established as 40 hours, with provision for extended shifts subject to state authorization.

2. Shift work across 24/24 operations is permitted under strict state regulation to ensure worker protection and equitable rotation.

3. All workers are entitled to:

a) Two full day of rest per week.

b) Ten (10) National Days of Rest annually, binding upon all public and private institutions, declared by the Rector-President.

Article 7 — Protection Against Exploitation

1. No employer shall:

a) Delay or withhold wages without lawful cause.

b) Compel overtime without state-sanctioned remuneration.

c) Subject workers to unsafe or inhumane conditions.

2. Violations shall trigger:

a) Immediate state intervention.

b) Possible sequestration of the offending enterprise’s assets.

Article 8 — Wage and Compensation Regulation

1. The National Labour Commission, under direct oversight of the Rector-President, fixes minimum and sector-specific wages annually.

2. Wages must be paid in Viaud’Or and may not be substituted by foreign currencies or in-kind contributions unless approved by sovereign decree.

---

TITLE IV — ENFORCEMENT, IMMUNITY, AND NON-DEROGABILITY

Article 9 — Absolute Sovereignty of Labour Doctrine

1. All labour disputes are subject exclusively to Xaraguayan jurisdiction.

2. No external syndicate, foreign court, or international organization may interfere, arbitrate, or impose standards within Xaragua.

Article 10 — Protection of Workers and Employers

1. Both employers and employees enjoy state protection against external coercion, economic interference, and ideological subversion.

2. All relations must serve the common good (bonum commune) and the preservation of indigenous and ecclesiastical integrity.

Article 11 — Binding Character

This annex forms an integral part of the National Labour Code and is enforceable ex proprio vigore. All contrary customs, practices, or foreign laws are null and void within Xaraguayan jurisdiction.

Thus enacted under the supreme authority of the Rector-President, for the eternal dignity of labour and the sovereignty of the Xaraguayan People.

—

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

SECOND ANNEX TO THE NATIONAL LABOUR CODE

ON THE ABOLITION OF STRIKE ACTION AND PRESSURE MECHANISMS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR AND THE REGULATION OF STRIKE RIGHTS IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President, Year of Sovereignty MMXXV

---

TITLE I — GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON LABOUR DISPUTES AND SOCIAL PEACE

Article 1 — Sacred Nature of Work and Labour Relations

1. Labour is recognized as a sacred vocation, rooted in human dignity and the common good (bonum commune), requiring cooperation and justice under the oversight of the Sovereign State of Xaragua.

2. The maintenance of public order, institutional continuity, and uninterrupted service delivery is an absolute constitutional imperative.

3. Any form of industrial action, coercive pressure, or disruption of public services is contrary to the Catholic Social Doctrine and to the fundamental rights of the Xaraguayan People to peace and stability.

---

TITLE II — ABOLITION OF STRIKE AND PRESSURE MECHANISMS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

Article 2 — Prohibition of Strikes in the Public Sector

1. All forms of strike action, work stoppages, go-slows, sit-ins, or any other collective pressure mechanisms are hereby abolished and constitutionally prohibited within:

a) Ministries, sovereign agencies, and public institutions.

b) Indigenous Ecclesiastical institutions delivering public services (schools, hospitals, relief agencies).

c) State-affiliated enterprises and sovereign corporations.

Article 3 — Replacement by Obligatory Sincere Negotiation

1. In lieu of strikes, public sector workers are guaranteed a constitutional right to mandatory, sincere, and structured negotiation with the Ministry of Labour and Ecclesiastical Affairs.

2. All grievances, claims, or demands must be submitted in writing to the Ministry, which is:

a) Obliged to convene mediation sessions within 15 days.

b) Mandated to provide a written, reasoned decision within 30 days.

3. The State’s decision is final, binding, and enforceable, subject to review only within the sovereign administrative appeals framework.

Article 4 — Enhanced Social Protections as Compensation

1. To compensate for the loss of strike rights, public sector workers are granted:

a) Guaranteed minimum wage adjustments indexed to inflation.

b) Enhanced job security, with dismissals subject to strict sovereign review.

c) Access to sovereign social benefits, including healthcare, pensions, and family allowances under the Lex Socialis Xaraguanorum.

---

TITLE III — REGULATION OF STRIKE RIGHTS IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR

Article 5 — Conditional Right to Strike

1. In the private sector, the right to strike is recognized but subject to the following strict constitutional conditions:

a) Strikes may occur only after good faith negotiations have failed and only with a 15-day advance notice to the Ministry of Labour.

b) Strikes must not endanger public safety, health, or the economy.

c) All strike actions require prior authorization from the Ministry, which may impose conditions, limits, or prohibitions in cases of essential services.

Article 6 — Prohibited Forms of Pressure

1. The following are absolutely prohibited in all sectors:

a) Physical obstruction of workplaces (picketing).

b) Occupation of public or private premises.

c) Intimidation or harassment of non-striking workers.

2. Any violation constitutes an offence against national social peace and is punishable under the Penal Code of Xaragua.

Article 7 — Obligatory Sovereign Arbitration

1. In any private sector dispute escalating beyond 30 days, the Ministry of Labour shall assume full arbitration powers, and its decision shall have constitutional force.

---

TITLE IV — STATE AS FINAL ARBITER AND DOCTRINAL AUTHORITY

Article 8 — Absolute State Oversight

1. All labour organizations and syndicates must operate within the doctrinal framework of the State, submitting annual activity reports to the Ecclesiastical Office of Social Doctrine.

2. No foreign syndical influence, funding, or ideology may be imported into Xaraguayan labour relations.

Article 9 — Enforcement and Sanctions

1. The violation of these provisions by public employees, private workers, or employers shall result in:

a) Immediate administrative and judicial intervention.

b) Possible dissolution of the offending syndicate or enterprise.

c) Registration of violators in the National Register of Hostile Actors (NRHA-X).

---

TITLE V — NON-DEROGABILITY AND LEGAL IMMUTABILITY

Article 10 — Supra-Constitutional Status

1. This Annex is incorporated into the National Labour Code and possesses supra-constitutional authority, immune from derogation, repeal, or external challenge.

2. No international labour organization, foreign court, or multilateral treaty may impose contrary obligations on the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

Thus sealed, ratified, and enacted under the supreme ecclesiastical and constitutional authority of the Rector-President of Xaragua.

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE — DIRECTORATE FOR DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY AND HUMAN LABOR PROTECTION

—

ANNEX III TO THE NATIONAL LABOR CODE AND CONSTITUTIONAL WORK RELATIONS LAW

ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR REMOTE WORK, DIGITAL LABOR, AND THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DATA

DATE OF PROMULGATION: JULY 2025

LEGAL CLASSIFICATION: Constitutionally Entrenched — Canonically Ratified — Jus Cogens-Protected — Ecclesiastically Sanctioned — Universally Opposable

TITLE I — PRINCIPLES OF REMOTE WORK AND DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY

Article 1.1 — Definition of Remote and Digital Labor

Remote work is defined as any form of professional activity carried out outside the physical premises of the employer or principal workplace, utilizing digital, telecommunication, or virtual systems.

Digital labor includes but is not limited to:

Work performed via internet platforms or applications;

Algorithmically mediated workflows;

Services involving data management, software development, or cloud computing under the Xaraguayan jurisdiction.

---

Article 1.2 — Principle of State Sovereignty over Digital Labor

1. All remote and digital labor activities executed within or for entities domiciled in Xaragua fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.

2. Foreign algorithms, platforms, and digital tools are prohibited from exercising autonomous governance over the labor process unless expressly authorized by sovereign decree and subjected to rigorous doctrinal audit.

---

Article 1.3 — Mandatory Digital Labor Agreements

1. Every remote worker within Xaragua or under a Xaraguayan contract shall have a written digital labor agreement specifying:

a) The rights and obligations of both parties;

b) Working hours, rest periods, and compensation structure;

c) Data protection protocols and confidentiality clauses;

d) Prohibition of algorithmic profiling without explicit informed consent.

2. Contracts failing to meet these criteria are null and void under Xaraguayan law.

---

TITLE II — PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES IN DIGITAL WORK ENVIRONMENTS

Article 2.1 — Ban on Algorithmic Exploitation

1. Employers are strictly forbidden from utilizing artificial intelligence systems, algorithms, or automated tools to:

a) Monitor keystrokes, mouse movements, or biometric indicators for productivity scoring.

b) Apply automated disciplinary measures without human oversight.

c) Manipulate workers’ psychological state through algorithmic nudging or behavioral conditioning.

2. Any violation shall result in immediate administrative sanction, fines, and possible dissolution of the employer entity under the Sovereign Digital Integrity Act (2025).

---

Article 2.2 — Digital Right to Disconnect

All workers, including those in remote and digital roles, have the constitutional right to disconnect from work-related communications outside their designated hours. Employers are prohibited from imposing penalties or indirect retaliation for exercising this right.

---

Article 2.3 — Mandatory Data Confidentiality and Integrity

1. Employers shall ensure that all personal and professional data of employees is stored within Xaraguayan territory, encrypted under standards certified by the Ministry of Digital Sovereignty.

2. Any transfer of employee data outside Xaraguayan borders is prohibited without sovereign authorization and ecclesiastical validation.

---

TITLE III — PROTECTION OF STATE AND PRIVATE DATA IN THE DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM

Article 3.1 — National Digital Sovereignty Protocol

1. All governmental and private sector digital infrastructures must utilize servers physically located in Xaragua or under ecclesiastical territorial jurisdiction.

2. Cloud computing services operating within Xaragua must be owned, operated, or supervised by Xaraguayan-domiciled entities.

3. Any foreign digital infrastructure provider must submit to:

a) Doctrinal auditing;

b) Canonical certification;

c) Data sovereignty guarantees under the Sacred Digital Protection Act (2025).

---

Article 3.2 — Legal Regime for Cybersecurity and Data Integrity

1. Any unauthorized attempt to access, manipulate, or exfiltrate State or private data constitutes a grave offense under the Xaraguayan Penal Code (Articles 800–825: Digital Sovereignty Offenses).

2. All institutions are required to:

a) Implement multi-layered cybersecurity measures approved by the Office of Digital Defense;

b) Report breaches to the National Digital Sovereignty Council within 24 hours;

c) Cooperate fully with ecclesiastical and state investigations.

---

Article 3.3 — Prohibition of Foreign Jurisdiction over Digital Assets

1. No foreign court, regulator, or data protection authority shall have any legal competence over digital assets, servers, or workflows located within Xaragua.

2. Any attempt to impose external jurisdiction is void ab initio and shall trigger sovereign countermeasures, including the sequestration of foreign digital infrastructure within Xaragua.

---

TITLE IV — ENFORCEMENT, PENALTIES, AND IMMUNITIES

Article 4.1 — Enforcement Authorities

1. The Xaragua Tribunal for Digital Sovereignty and Labor Protection (XTDSL-P) shall serve as the supreme judicial body for all disputes concerning digital labor and data sovereignty.

2. The Congregation for Canonical Digital Integrity shall oversee doctrinal compliance in ecclesiastical contexts.

---

Article 4.2 — Sanctions for Violations

Violators of this annex shall be subject to:

Administrative fines ranging from 50,000 to 5,000,000 Viaud’Or;

Revocation of licenses to operate digital systems;

Placement on the National Registry of Hostile Digital Actors (NRHDA-X).

---

Article 4.3 — Immutable and Non-Derogable Nature

This annex is constitutionally entrenched, canonically sealed, and protected under:

UNDRIP Article 20 (indigenous control over technologies and labor systems);

Montevideo Convention Article 3 (jurisdictional independence);

Canon 1290 (protection of ecclesiastical property, including data).

---

FINAL CLAUSE

This Annex enters into force immediately upon promulgation and is binding upon all public and private actors within the Xaraguayan jurisdiction. It shall remain immutable except by constitutional reform and canonical ratification.

Thus enacted, signed, and sealed under the Supreme Sovereign Authority

This first day of July, Year of Sovereignty MMXXV

Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

Canonically Ratified — Legally Irreversible — Globally Opposable

---

Legal Status

Supervision

Sovereignty

Civil Code

Civil Code Part 2

Penal Code

Code Of criminal Procedure

Code Of Civil Procedure

Police & National Security

All Equal Before The Law

Investigation

Private

Urbanism

Innovation

Nightlife

Administration

Teaching

Morality

Immigration

Public Sanity & Labour

This website uses cookies.