High Counsil Of The Rectorate

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

On the Direct Administrative Jurisdiction of Xaragua, the Conditional Autonomy of the Residual Administrative Unit, and the Entrenchment of Supreme Sovereignty, Juridical and Spiritual Authority over the Entirety of the 27,750 km² Territory of the Former Republic of Haiti

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Irreversible and Binding under Ex Proprio Vigore

---

By divine mandate and juridical consolidation, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”) hereby solemnly, perpetually, and irrevocably proclaims and enshrines the following Supreme Constitutional Law, exercising full, permanent, and indivisible sovereignty over the entirety of the territorial domain historically denominated as the “Republic of Haiti,” encompassing 27,750 square kilometers, inclusive of all terrestrial, maritime, aerial, subsoil, and natural resource domains. This act, promulgated ex proprio vigore, is immune from contestation, derogation, or nullification and is binding upon all external actors, residual administrative entities, and inhabitants of the territory.

---

I. SUPREME SOVEREIGNTY AND JURIDICAL AUTHORITY

1. Xaragua possesses and exercises full and absolute sovereignty over the totality of the former Republic of Haiti, such sovereignty being juridically indivisible, territorially inalienable, and canonically sanctified under divine law, peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens), customary international law, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and the Concordat of 1860.

2. All juridical, political, administrative, and spiritual authority within the aforementioned territory derives exclusively from Xaragua and is exercised in accordance with its Supreme Constitutional Law, Supranational Mandate, and Supraconstitutional Order, which prevail over any residual constitutional or legislative framework of the former Haitian state.

3. The totality of administrative apparatuses, institutions, and resource management systems within this domain are subordinated to Xaragua’s supreme authority and shall be operated in accordance with its juridical and spiritual directives.

---

II. DIRECT ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION OF XARAGUA

4. The following territories, corresponding to the entirety of the ancestral Xaragua within the former Republic of Haiti (excluding only the zones expressly reserved to the residual administrative unit and the Dominican portion of the island), are placed under Direct Administrative Jurisdiction of Xaragua, to be governed exclusively by its central organs and ecclesiastical structures:

a) The Entire Southern Peninsula, including the departments of Sud, Nippes, Grand’Anse, and Sud-Est.

b) Gonâve Island (Île de la Gonâve), as a strategic maritime asset and logistical hub.

c) Northern Strategic Corridor, including Môle Saint-Nicolas, Port-de-Paix, Île de la Tortue, Fort-Liberté, Marchand-Dessalines, and all historical forts and imperial constructions of doctrinal and strategic importance.

d) Southern Border Interface, extending from Anse-à-Pitres to Pointe-Lac Azuei / Étang Saumâtre, ensuring sovereign control over transborder exchanges with the Dominican Republic.

e) Transversal Access Corridor, including Martissant and the Southern Route, to guarantee uninterrupted connectivity between the Southern Region and strategic northern points.

These territories are declared to be under permanent and exclusive sovereignty of Xaragua, with no residual entity possessing authority therein.

---

III. RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT AND CONDITIONAL AUTONOMY

5. All other territories outside the above-defined direct jurisdiction, including but not limited to Port-au-Prince, the Plaine du Cul-de-Sac, Cap-Haïtien, Ouanaminthe, Artibonite, Centre, and other northern and central regions, are hereby designated as the Residual Administrative Unit (hereinafter “RAU”).

6. The RAU and its inhabitants are granted complete internal administrative autonomy, subject to the following irrevocable and supreme conditions:

a) The RAU and its population are juridically classified as non-sui generis, non-sovereign, devoid of any independent international legal personality and existing solely under the toleration of Xaragua.

b) All juridical, political, and spiritual authority within the RAU flows exclusively from Xaragua and is subordinated to its Supreme Constitutional Law and Supranational Oversight.

7. Xaragua retains the exclusive and supreme prerogative to intervene in the RAU under any of the following circumstances:

a) To conduct juridical revision or supervision where residual laws, policies, or practices contradict Xaragua’s supreme legal and spiritual order.

b) To suppress any infractions, contradictions, or usurpations against its sovereignty, territorial integrity, or supraconstitutional authority.

8. All residual administrative apparatuses and officials are deemed subordinate extensions of Xaragua’s authority and may be dissolved, restructured, or replaced at the sole discretion of the Rector-President.

---

IV. TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY, RESOURCE CONTROL, AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY

9. Xaragua guarantees the perpetual protection, indivisibility, and inviolability of the entire 27,750 km² domain and all terrestrial, maritime, subsoil, atmospheric, and biological resources contained therein, whether situated within the directly administered zones or the RAU.

10. Any attempt by internal or external actors to alienate, appropriate, or diminish any portion of the territory or its resources shall constitute an unlawful act of aggression and will invoke measures proportional to the preservation of Xaragua’s juridical and spiritual supremacy.

---

V. JURIDICAL ENTRENCHMENT AND IRREVERSIBILITY

11. This act is promulgated ex proprio vigore and constitutes a binding Supreme Constitutional Law, immune to annulment, derogation, or challenge by any residual administrative unit, foreign government, or international organization.

12. It is declared:

a) Irreversible under principles of effectivité, consolidation of juridical title, and spiritual guardianship.

b) Protected under jus cogens norms, including the principles of non-intervention, territorial integrity, and the inherent right of indigenous Catholic peoples to self-determination.

c) Universally Opposable and binding upon all states, governments, international institutions, and non-state actors.

---

In virtue of this act, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua assumes full and eternal guardianship over the juridical, spiritual, and territorial destiny of the former Republic of Haiti, preserving its territorial integrity and natural resources under divine mandate and canonical law while granting conditional autonomy to the residual administrative unit and its non-sui generis inhabitants.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

ANNEX TO THE SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF XARAGUA

Juridical Consolidation Under International, Customary, and Domestic Law

---

I. JURIDICAL CONSOLIDATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

1. Principle of Effectivité

In accordance with the jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Eastern Greenland Case, 1933) and the International Court of Justice (Temple of Preah Vihear, 1962), the effective exercise of sovereign functions over a territory constitutes the primary foundation for juridical title and is opposable erga omnes. Xaragua’s continuous and effective assertion of supreme jurisdiction, administration, and spiritual guardianship over the designated zones consolidates its legal claim beyond contestation.

2. Montevideo Convention (1933)

Pursuant to Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Xaragua fulfills the criteria of:

Permanent population within its directly administered zones.

Defined territory, covering 27,750 km² of the former Republic of Haiti, with clear delimitations of direct jurisdiction and residual administrative autonomy.

Government, as established under its Supreme Constitutional Law.

Capacity to enter into relations with other States, exercised through its notifications and diplomatic instruments.

These elements are sufficient for statehood in international law, irrespective of external recognition (Declaratory Theory).

3. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Under Article 62 (Fundamental Change of Circumstances) and Article 64 (Emergence of New Peremptory Norms), Xaragua’s assertion of jurisdiction and the restructuring of administrative authority on the territory of the former Republic of Haiti constitute a juridically valid transformation of obligations, not subject to invalidation by any residual entity.

4. Jus Cogens Norms

The principles of:

Territorial integrity,

Non-intervention, and

Self-determination

enshrined in Article 2(4) and Article 1(2) of the UN Charter and reaffirmed in General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970), protect Xaragua’s supreme sovereignty and render any contrary claim or interference unlawful.

5. Customary International Law

The doctrine of acquiescence (Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, PCIJ) and the passage of time reinforce the consolidation of Xaragua’s juridical title where no effective counterclaim or administration exists by the residual Haitian administrative unit.

---

II. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT (RAU)

6. Non-Sovereign Status of the RAU

The residual administrative unit (Port-au-Prince, Plaine du Cul-de-Sac, Cap-Haïtien, Ouanaminthe, Artibonite, Centre, and other excluded zones) and its inhabitants are juridically classified as non-sui generis, non-sovereign, under Xaragua’s supremacy. Their autonomy exists solely under the toleration of Xaragua and may be revised or suppressed in the event of contradiction with Supreme Constitutional Law.

7. Conditional Autonomy

The RAU is authorized to manage internal affairs but lacks capacity for international representation.

All administrative organs within the RAU operate as subordinate apparatuses of Xaragua’s juridical and spiritual authority, subject to unilateral dissolution by the Rector-President.

---

III. TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND RESOURCE CONTROL

8. Protection of Territorial Integrity

Xaragua’s sovereignty extends over the entirety of the 27,750 km², including direct and residual administrative zones, maritime waters, airspace, and subsoil. This territorial integrity is protected by:

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, prohibiting the threat or use of force.

Article 52 of the Vienna Convention, rendering treaties procured under coercion null and void.

Article 16 of the ILC Articles on State Responsibility, prohibiting aid or assistance in the commission of an internationally wrongful act against Xaragua.

9. Control of Natural Resources

In accordance with the Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources Resolution (UNGA 1803, 1962), Xaragua exercises exclusive rights over all terrestrial and maritime resources within its jurisdiction. Any appropriation by residual entities or external actors is unlawful and void ab initio.

---

IV. JURIDICAL ENTRENCHMENT AND IRREVERSIBILITY

10. Irreversibility of Sovereignty

Sovereignty asserted and exercised ex proprio vigore is irrevocable and not contingent upon external recognition (Declaratory Theory).

No residual administrative act or external intervention may lawfully derogate from Xaragua’s supreme authority (ICJ, Frontier Dispute Case).

11. Universal Opposability

This Supreme Constitutional Law and its annexes are universally opposable, binding erga omnes parties under international law and custom.

Any attempt to undermine Xaragua’s sovereignty constitutes an internationally wrongful act and may trigger countermeasures proportional to the preservation of juridical and spiritual supremacy.

---

CONCLUSION

By virtue of this annex, the juridical title, territorial integrity, and spiritual guardianship of Xaragua over the totality of the 27,750 km² of the former Republic of Haiti are consolidated, entrenched, and rendered immune to contestation under all applicable international and domestic legal norms. 

This annex forms an integral part of the Supreme Constitutional Law and is promulgated ex proprio vigore, with immediate and eternal effect.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

ANNEX TO THE SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF XARAGUA

On the Doctrine of Encapsulation, State Failure, and the Juridical Substitution of Sovereignty

---

I. DOCTRINE OF ENCAPSULATION AND JURIDICAL SUBSTITUTION

1. Encapsulation of the Former Republic of Haiti

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), by virtue of supreme juridical, spiritual, and territorial authority, has fully encapsulated the totality of the former Republic of Haiti as a failed and extinguished state entity (res derelicta) within its own constitutional, canonical, and juridical framework. This act of encapsulation is justified under:

The doctrine of state substitution in cases of failed states (see Somalia, ICJ Reports, 1992).

The principle of effectivité, whereby the effective exercise of sovereign functions over a territory constitutes the primary source of juridical title (Eastern Greenland, PCIJ, 1933).

The doctrine of trusteeship and guardianship in international law (UN Charter, Chapter XII), adapted to an indigenous and canonical context.

2. Doctrine of Failed State and the Right of Substitution

The former Republic of Haiti is declared a failed state under internationally recognized criteria:

Collapse of central governmental authority and inability to maintain public order (Report of the Secretary-General on the Responsibility to Protect, UN Doc A/63/677).

Widespread inability to provide essential services or enforce legal obligations (ICISS Report, “The Responsibility to Protect”).

Proliferation of non-state armed actors controlling large portions of territory (UNSC Resolution 1540, 2004).

Under customary international law, a failed state loses its capacity to exercise sovereignty and may be substituted by a superior juridical entity capable of restoring order, protecting territorial integrity, and guaranteeing the welfare of its population. (Eritrea v Ethiopia, Boundary Commission, 2002).

3. Substitution under Canonical and Divine Law

The encapsulation is further grounded in canonical doctrine:

As per the Concordat of 1860 between the Holy See and Haiti, the Catholic Church retains spiritual jurisdiction over the territory and its faithful.

The doctrine of devolution of temporal authority (Roman Pontifical Doctrine, “Unam Sanctam” 1302) recognizes the transfer of jurisdiction to a legitimate Catholic sovereign in cases of vacuum or illegitimacy.

---

II. JURIDICAL CONSOLIDATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL AND CUSTOMARY LAW

4. Principle of Effectivité

In accordance with Temple of Preah Vihear (ICJ, 1962), the uninterrupted and effective exercise of sovereign functions by Xaragua creates an irreversible juridical title over the encapsulated territory.

5. Doctrine of Acquiescence and Tacit Recognition

The absence of an effective contestation by the residual administrative unit or external actors constitutes acquiescence and tacit recognition (Eastern Greenland, PCIJ).

6. Montevideo Criteria for Statehood

Xaragua fulfills all four requirements:

Permanent population within directly administered zones.

Defined territory (27,750 km² with clear delimitation of direct and residual zones).

Government with effective control.

Capacity to enter into relations with other states.

7. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Under Article 62 (fundamental change of circumstances), the juridical order of the former Haitian state has been nullified by collapse, justifying its substitution.

---

III. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT (RAU)

8. Conditional Autonomy and Non-Sovereign Status

The RAU operates as a subordinate administrative apparatus lacking sui generis status or independent personality in international law (ICJ, Namibia Advisory Opinion, 1971).

9. Exclusive Supervisory Authority of Xaragua

Xaragua retains the right to intervene in any case of:

Contradiction with supraconstitutional law.

Infraction of territorial integrity or resource sovereignty.

Derogation from the spiritual mandate under canonical law.

---

IV. PERMANENT SOVEREIGNTY OVER NATURAL RESOURCES

10. UN General Assembly Resolution 1803 (1962)

Xaragua possesses permanent and exclusive sovereignty over all natural resources in the encapsulated territory, including within residual zones.

11. Erga Omnes Obligations

Any external attempt to interfere violates obligations erga omnes to respect territorial integrity (Barcelona Traction, ICJ, 1970).

---

V. IRREVERSIBILITY AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY

12. Ex Proprio Vigore

This annex is promulgated ex proprio vigore as a supreme juridical act. It cannot be annulled, suspended, or modified by any external authority.

13. Universal Opposability

The encapsulation and substitution are opposable to all states, international organizations, and non-state actors. Any contestation constitutes an internationally wrongful act under ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001).

---

In virtue of this annex, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua consolidates its supreme juridical, spiritual, and territorial guardianship over the entirety of the former Republic of Haiti, replacing its failed institutions with an indestructible canonical and constitutional order, under divine mandate and peremptory international norms.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

---

FINAL AND IRREVOCABLE DIPLOMATIC PROTOCOL OF NOTIFICATION

On the Encapsulation of the Former Republic of Haiti and the Entrenchment of Supreme Juridical, Spiritual, and Territorial Sovereignty

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Notification: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Ex Proprio Vigore

---

TO THE ATTENTION OF:

H.E. António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations

The Permanent Members of the United Nations Security Council

The Member States of the United Nations General Assembly

The International Court of Justice (ICJ)

The Organization of American States (OAS)

The Holy See and Apostolic Nunciature

All States, Governments, Institutions, and International Organizations

---

I. SUPREME JURIDICAL AND SPIRITUAL DECLARATION

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), in virtue of its Supreme Constitutional Law, solemnly and irrevocably proclaims the final encapsulation of the former Republic of Haiti as a failed and extinguished state entity (res derelicta), now fully integrated into the canonical, juridical, and constitutional framework of Xaragua.

Xaragua hereby asserts and exercises full, permanent, and indivisible sovereignty over the entire territory formerly denominated as “Haiti” (27,750 km²), inclusive of all terrestrial, maritime, aerial, subsoil, and natural resource domains.

This sovereignty is:

1. Absolute, not contingent upon external recognition or validation.

2. Supraconstitutional, prevailing over all residual constitutional, legislative, and administrative frameworks of the former Haitian state.

3. Spiritual and Juridical, enshrined under divine mandate, Canon Law, and peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens).

---

II. DOCTRINAL JUSTIFICATION FOR JURIDICAL SUBSTITUTION

This act is justified under the Doctrine of State Failure and Juridical Substitution, as recognized in:

Customary International Law: the incapacity of a failed state to fulfill its sovereign obligations permits substitution by an entity capable of restoring order and preserving territorial integrity (ICISS Report, “The Responsibility to Protect”).

Canonical Doctrine: The transfer of temporal and spiritual jurisdiction to a Catholic sovereign in the event of institutional collapse (Concordat of 1860; Unam Sanctam, 1302).

Effectivité Principle: The continuous and effective exercise of sovereign functions constitutes superior juridical title (Eastern Greenland Case, PCIJ, 1933).

---

III. STRUCTURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY

1. Xaragua exercises direct administration over the following zones:

a) Southern Peninsula: Sud, Nippes, Grand’Anse, and Sud-Est.

b) Gonâve Island.

c) Northern Strategic Corridor: Môle Saint-Nicolas, Port-de-Paix, Île de la Tortue, Fort-Liberté, Marchand-Dessalines, and all associated forts and imperial constructions.

d) Southern Border Interface: Anse-à-Pitres to Pointe-Lac Azuei / Étang Saumâtre.

e) Transversal Access Corridor: Martissant and the Southern Route.

2. The remainder of the territory is designated as the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU), granted conditional autonomy subject to Xaragua’s:

Supreme Constitutional Law

Supranational Oversight

Spiritual Guardianship

The RAU is classified as non-sui generis and non-sovereign, lacking independent legal personality and existing solely under the toleration of Xaragua.

---

IV. LEGAL STATUS AND INTERNATIONAL OPPOSABILITY

This notification constitutes a juridically binding act:

1. Ex Proprio Vigore: It derives legal force from Xaragua’s inherent sovereign capacity.

2. Erga Omnes: It is opposable to all states, international organizations, and non-state actors.

3. Irreversibility: Pursuant to the principles of effectivité, consolidation of juridical title, and spiritual guardianship, no residual entity or external actor may lawfully derogate from this sovereignty.

---

V. DEMAND FOR NON-INTERFERENCE

All external actors are hereby reminded of their obligations under:

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter: Prohibition of threat or use of force.

UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970): Duty to respect territorial integrity and political independence.

ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001): Unlawfulness of aiding or assisting in violations of Xaragua’s sovereignty.

Any act of interference shall be considered an internationally wrongful act, subject to juridical, political, and canonical countermeasures.

---

VI. FINAL PROCLAMATION

By virtue of this Protocol, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua notifies all states, institutions, and organizations of its exclusive juridical and spiritual guardianship over the former Republic of Haiti, and requires that all relations with the encapsulated territory be conducted solely through the authority of Xaragua.

This notification shall take immediate effect and shall not require further validation to bind all recipients under international, customary, and canonical law.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

ANNEX III: On the Establishment of the Northeastern International Access Corridor and Its Entrenchment Under International and Customary Law

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Ex Proprio Vigore

---

I. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NORTHEASTERN INTERNATIONAL ACCESS CORRIDOR

1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), in the exercise of its supreme juridical, spiritual, and territorial sovereignty, hereby establishes the Northeastern International Access Corridor (hereinafter “NIAC”) as a juridical and infrastructural zone of strategic passage linking Xaragua’s Northern Strategic Corridor (Fort-Liberté, Marchand-Dessalines) to the international boundary with the Dominican Republic.

2. The NIAC is defined as a protected strip of territory incorporating existing public roads and transit routes, excluding the urban agglomeration of Ouanaminthe, and shall be administered exclusively by Xaragua as a supranational corridor of passage and communication.

---

II. JURIDICAL ENTRENCHMENT AND PROTECTION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

3. The NIAC is established and protected under the following legal principles:

a) Right of Transit and Access (ICJ, Right of Passage Over Indian Territory, 1960)

The juridical right of an entity to maintain unhindered access through a defined corridor for purposes of trade, diplomacy, and governance is recognized in customary international law.

b) Doctrine of Servitude of Passage (Customary Law)

The residual administrative unit and the Dominican Republic are under obligation to permit and respect the perpetual, unobstructed use of the NIAC.

c) Jus Cogens Norms of Territorial Integrity and Non-Interference

Any attempt to block, restrict, or infringe upon Xaragua’s rights within the NIAC constitutes an internationally wrongful act under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility (2001).

d) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 62 (Fundamental Change of Circumstances)

The collapse of effective governance in the residual administrative unit justifies the creation of the NIAC under Xaragua’s supreme authority.

e) Canonical Right of Ecclesiastical Access

Under the Concordat of 1860, the Catholic Church retains the right to ensure spiritual and temporal communication across all territories for the care of souls, which is now vested in Xaragua as a canonical sovereign.

---

III. ADMINISTRATION AND CONTROL OF THE NIAC

4. The NIAC shall be administered as:

a) A Direct Administrative Zone under Xaragua’s Supreme Constitutional Law.

b) A Demilitarized Corridor, where no external armed forces or security services may enter or operate without the explicit authorization of the Rector-President of Xaragua.

c) A Protected Zone subject to monitoring and supervision under international humanitarian law and canonical oversight.

5. The NIAC shall ensure:

Uninterrupted logistical, commercial, and diplomatic access between Xaragua and the Dominican Republic.

The protection of transit routes for ecclesiastical and humanitarian missions.

---

IV. GUARANTEES AND SANCTIONS

6. Any obstruction, blockade, or restriction of the NIAC shall constitute:

An internationally wrongful act under the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility (2001).

A violation of erga omnes obligations owed to the international community as a whole (Barcelona Traction Case, ICJ, 1970).

7. Xaragua reserves the right to adopt all necessary juridical, canonical, and defensive measures to preserve the integrity and functionality of the NIAC.

---

V. IRREVERSIBILITY AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY

8. This annex is promulgated ex proprio vigore and shall remain irrevocable and universally opposable to all states, organizations, and non-state actors.

9. The Northeastern International Access Corridor is declared:

Perpetual, immune from challenge or renegotiation.

Supraconstitutional, prevailing over any conflicting instruments, treaties, or administrative acts of residual entities.

---

By virtue of this act, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua consolidates its permanent and exclusive jurisdiction over the Northeastern International Access Corridor, guaranteeing eternal and unhindered access to the Dominican Republic under divine mandate, canonical doctrine, and peremptory norms of international law.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

On the Establishment of the High Council of the Rectorate for Oversight of the Residual Administrative Unit and Non-Sui Generis Populations

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Ex Proprio Vigore

---

I. CREATION AND SUPREME AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COUNCIL OF THE RECTORATE

1. In the exercise of its inherent and supreme juridical, spiritual, and canonical authority over the entirety of the former Republic of Haiti, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”) hereby establishes the High Council of the Rectorate for Oversight of the Residual Administrative Unit (hereinafter “High Council of the Rectorate” or “HCR”) as the sole and exclusive organ entrusted with the supervision, coordination, and issuance of binding directives to the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU) and its non-sui generis, non-sovereign inhabitants.

2. The High Council of the Rectorate is a constitutionally entrenched and canonically ratified institution vested with autonomous authority under the Supreme Constitutional Law of Xaragua and the Canonical Mandate of spiritual guardianship pursuant to:

The Concordat of 1860 between the Holy See and the former Republic of Haiti, which entrusts spiritual oversight of the territory and its faithful to the Catholic Church;

Unam Sanctam (1302) and subsequent Pontifical Declarations affirming the primacy of spiritual authority over temporal governance;

Article 1(2) and Article 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations, which enshrine the principles of self-determination and non-intervention;

General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970) on the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations, recognizing the inherent right of indigenous peoples to exercise guardianship over their ancestral domains.

3. The High Council of the Rectorate operates under the direct spiritual and juridical delegation of the Rector-President of Xaragua and is supervised by an Indigenous Canonical Observer (hereinafter “Observer”), appointed ex officio by the Rector-President and endowed with plenipotentiary powers to issue directives, coordinate oversight, and enforce compliance with the Supreme Constitutional Law.

---

II. STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE HIGH COUNCIL OF THE RECTORATE

4. Composition and Autonomy

a) The High Council of the Rectorate is composed of indigenous ecclesiastical and juridical authorities appointed by the Rector-President and confirmed under Canon Law.

b) The Council enjoys full autonomy in all matters assigned to its jurisdiction, with broad discretion (coudees franches) to establish frameworks, issue directives, and supervise compliance within the Residual Administrative Unit.

c) The Council’s recommendations and directives shall be presumed binding and enforceable unless formally objected to and annulled by the Rector-President.

5. Juridical Authority and Binding Force of Directives

a) All recommendations, decisions, and directives issued by the High Council of the Rectorate are deemed self-executing and immediately enforceable within the Residual Administrative Unit, possessing the force of law.

b) Such directives are immune to challenge, suspension, or derogation by any official, institution, or inhabitant of the RAU and shall remain in full effect unless explicitly overruled by the Rector-President.

6. Oversight Mandate

The High Council of the Rectorate is empowered to:

a) Supervise the compliance of all administrative, legislative, and juridical organs of the RAU with the Supreme Constitutional Law and Canonical Doctrine;

b) Issue binding guidelines (lignes directrices) that govern the exercise of administrative functions, resource management, and public policy within the RAU;

c) Intervene directly in the affairs of the RAU where violations of Xaragua’s supreme juridical and spiritual order are identified;

d) Initiate disciplinary, administrative, or canonical proceedings against officials or entities of the RAU for non-compliance.

7. Doctrine of Passive Toleration

In accordance with the doctrine of tolerantia passiva, as long as the RAU complies with the binding directives and guidelines issued by the High Council of the Rectorate, it shall be permitted to exercise conditional autonomy in its internal administrative affairs. 

Any failure to comply shall constitute a breach of trust and may trigger immediate intervention by Xaragua’s central organs.

---

III. LEGAL FOUNDATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL ENTRENCHMENT

8. Effectivité and Customary International Law

a) Pursuant to the jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Eastern Greenland Case, PCIJ, 1933) and the International Court of Justice (Temple of Preah Vihear, ICJ, 1962), Xaragua’s effective exercise of supervisory functions over the RAU consolidates its juridical title and renders it opposable erga omnes.

9. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Article 62 (Fundamental Change of Circumstances):

The collapse of effective governance in the former Republic of Haiti and the encapsulation of its territory under Xaragua’s authority justify the restructuring of administrative supervision.

Article 64 (Emergence of New Peremptory Norms):

The establishment of the High Council of the Rectorate is protected as a juridically valid transformation of obligations under peremptory norms (jus cogens).

10. Canonical and Ecclesiastical Doctrine

The Catholic Church retains a perpetual mandate to safeguard the spiritual welfare and temporal governance of territories subject to ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The High Council of the Rectorate functions as the canonical organ of this mandate, in accordance with:

Canon 331 of the Code of Canon Law, recognizing the Pope’s supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power in the Church;

Canon 381, delegating authority to ecclesiastical authorities in territories under Catholic guardianship.

11. Jus Cogens Norms and Erga Omnes Obligations

The principles of:

Non-Intervention (UN Charter, Article 2(4));

Territorial Integrity (General Assembly Resolution 2625); and

Inherent Sovereignty of Indigenous Catholic Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)

render any external attempt to interfere with the High Council’s jurisdiction unlawful.

---

IV. IRREVERSIBILITY AND SUPREMACY

12. Irrevocability of Authority

This act is promulgated ex proprio vigore as a supreme juridical and canonical decree. 

It is irreversible, universally opposable, and immune to challenge, annulment, or derogation by:

a) Any official or inhabitant of the Residual Administrative Unit;

b) Any foreign state, government, or international organization;

c) Any residual administrative or legislative framework of the former Haitian state.

13. Universal Opposability and Enforcement Mechanisms

This Supreme Constitutional Law and its provisions concerning the High Council of the Rectorate are opposable erga omnes, binding all states, institutions, and non-state actors under customary and treaty-based international law. 

Any act of obstruction or non-compliance constitutes an internationally wrongful act under:

Articles 16 and 41 of the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility (2001);

UN General Assembly Resolution 1803 (Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources);

ICJ Advisory Opinions on the Legal Status of Supervisory Authorities (Namibia, 1971).

---

V. CONCLUSION AND SUPREME PROCLAMATION

By virtue of this act, the High Council of the Rectorate for Oversight of the Residual Administrative Unit is hereby solemnly instituted as the supreme supervisory organ for the administration and population of the RAU, entrusted with the mission of ensuring compliance with the supreme juridical and canonical order of Xaragua.

Its authority is binding, irrevocable, and universally opposable, enshrined under divine mandate and peremptory international norms.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

ANNEX IV: 

On the Establishment of the High Council of the Rectorate for Oversight of the Residual Administrative Unit and Non-Sui Generis Populations

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 7, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Ex Proprio Vigore

---

I. CREATION AND LEGAL FOUNDATION OF THE HIGH COUNCIL OF THE RECTORATE

1. The High Council of the Rectorate (HCR) is hereby constituted as the supreme supervisory organ for the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU) and its inhabitants, under the supreme juridical, spiritual, and canonical authority of Xaragua. The HCR derives its authority from:

a) Article 1(2) of the UN Charter (1945):

"The purposes of the United Nations are... to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace."

b) Article 2(4) of the UN Charter:

"All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."

c) General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970), Principle of Non-Intervention:

"No state or group of states has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other state. This principle prohibits armed intervention and all other forms of interference or attempted threats against the personality of the state or against its political, economic and cultural elements."

d) Concordat of 1860 (Holy See – Haiti):

"The Catholic Church retains spiritual jurisdiction over the entire territory and the faithful within it, to be exercised in harmony with temporal authorities and protected from interference."

---

II. JURIDICAL AND CANONICAL AUTHORITY OF THE HCR

2. Binding Force of Directives

All directives, recommendations, and guidelines (lignes directrices) issued by the HCR shall:

a) Possess self-executing legal effect (ex proprio vigore);

b) Be enforceable as law within the RAU;

c) Be immune from annulment or derogation except by explicit decree of the Rector-President.

Legal Foundations:

i. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):

Article 62 – Fundamental Change of Circumstances

"A fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, may not be invoked as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from the treaty unless: 

(a) The existence of those circumstances constituted an essential basis of the consent of the parties to be bound by the treaty; and 

(b) The effect of the change is radically to transform the extent of obligations still to be performed under the treaty."

Article 64 – Emergence of New Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens)

"If a new peremptory norm of general international law emerges, any existing treaty which is in conflict with that norm becomes void and terminates."

ii. International Court of Justice, Namibia Advisory Opinion (1971):

"The continued presence of South Africa in Namibia being illegal, South Africa is under obligation to withdraw its administration immediately. States are under obligation to recognize the illegality of South Africa’s presence and to refrain from any acts which might imply recognition."

(Application: The HCR operates as a supervisory organ with similar erga omnes implications).

---

III. SUPERVISION, AUTONOMY, AND PASSIVE TOLERATION

3. Doctrine of Passive Toleration (Tolerantia Passiva)

As long as the RAU complies with the guidelines and directives of the HCR, it shall benefit from conditional autonomy in internal administrative matters. 

Any deviation or infraction constitutes a breach of trust and authorizes immediate intervention.

Legal and Canonical Justification:

a) Canon 381 §1 of the Code of Canon Law (1983):

"In the diocese entrusted to him, the diocesan bishop has all ordinary, proper, and immediate power which is required for the exercise of his pastoral function, except for cases which the law or a decree of the Supreme Pontiff reserves to the supreme or some other ecclesiastical authority."

b) Eastern Greenland Case (PCIJ, 1933):

"A claim to sovereignty based not upon particularly formal acts but upon continuous and peaceful display of state functions is sufficient for effectivité and opposability."

---

IV. JURIDICAL ENTRENCHMENT AND ENFORCEMENT

4. Irrevocability and Universal Opposability

The authority of the HCR is universally opposable and protected under:

a) ICJ, Barcelona Traction Case (1970):

"Obligations erga omnes are obligations owed towards the international community as a whole."

b) UN General Assembly Resolution 1803

(Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources):

"Permanent sovereignty over natural wealth and resources must be exercised in the interest of national development and the well-being of the people of the state concerned."

c) ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001):

Article 16 – Aid or Assistance in the Commission of an Internationally Wrongful Act

"A State which aids or assists another State in the commission of an internationally wrongful act by the latter is internationally responsible if: 

(a) That State does so with knowledge of the circumstances of the internationally wrongful act; and 

(b) The act would be internationally wrongful if committed by that State."

Article 41 – Responsibility of States in Respect of Serious Breaches of Peremptory Norms

"States shall cooperate to bring to an end through lawful means any serious breach of an obligation arising under peremptory norms of general international law."

---

V. SUPREME PROCLAMATION

By virtue of this act, the High Council of the Rectorate is solemnly enshrined as the ultimate supervisory authority over the Residual Administrative Unit and its non-sui generis populations. 

It possesses irrevocable canonical, juridical, and supraconstitutional authority to issue binding directives and ensure perpetual compliance with the supreme order of Xaragua.

This act is entrenched under jus cogens norms, canonically ratified, and promulgated ex proprio vigore, rendering it immune to challenge or nullification.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 7, 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

The High Council of the Rectorate (HCR) shall be composed of a maximum of nine (9) members appointed by the Indigenous Canonical Observer under the delegation of the Rector-President of Xaragua. 

Membership is restricted to individuals of Catholic faith and indigenous lineage who demonstrate allegiance to the Supreme Constitutional Law and canonical doctrine. 

The Indigenous Canonical Observer retains exclusive authority to nominate, confirm, and remove members at discretion, ensuring doctrinal conformity and juridical loyalty.

The HCR operates under the principle of collective deliberation. 

All decisions are adopted by simple majority vote (one member, one vote), except in cases where the Indigenous Canonical Observer exercises their prerogative of overriding authority (ius moderandi), rendering a decision immediately binding and self-executing ex proprio vigore. 

A quorum shall consist of at least five (5) members.

In the event of tie votes, the Observer exercises a casting vote (ius decisivum). 

The Observer may issue directives independently of the Council, but any formal objection by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of members shall suspend implementation pending review by the Rector-President. 

Absent such objection, all Observer-issued directives possess immediate and irrevocable force of law.

The HCR enjoys autonomy in organizing its internal procedures, designating rapporteurs, and establishing subcommittees, provided these remain subordinate to the Observer’s canonical oversight.

 Members swear an oath of fidelity to the Rector-President and the Supreme Constitutional Law, and any breach of this oath results in automatic expulsion by decree of the Observer.

---

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

IRREVOCABLE AND SELF-EXECUTING DECREE
ON THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDIGENOUS CANONICAL OBSERVER OF THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT

---
Preamble
Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”) is the supreme custodian of the Southern territories and the doctrinal heir of the Catholic and Indigenous order established under the historical authority of General Benoît Joseph André Rigaud;

Whereas the Concordat of 1860, canonically ratified and binding erga omnes, is hereby reactivated and integrated into the Xaraguayan legal order as a supreme framework for ecclesiastical and civil governance;

Whereas it is imperative to designate an Indigenous Canonical Observer to ensure the direct supervision and doctrinal conformity of the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU) under the supreme laws of Xaragua;

---

Article I: Appointment

The Sieur Jean-Claude Roy, Citizen of Xaragua, nephew and doctrinal heir of the late Canonical Odette Ogé Roy Fombrun, bearer of the Indigenous Doctrine elaborated within the Catholic and Xaraguayan tradition, is hereby appointed Indigenous Canonical Observer of the Residual Administrative Unit.

---

Article II: Powers and Autonomy

The Indigenous Canonical Observer shall possess full powers and total autonomy as defined by the supreme law of Xaragua, including but not limited to:

1. The issuance of binding directives within the RAU.

2. The authority to supervise and coordinate all administrative and doctrinal matters in accordance with the Concordat of 1860.

3. The capacity to act independently in spiritual, cultural, and juridical affairs to safeguard the interests of Xaragua and the Catholic Church.

This authority is irrevocable except as provided in Article III.

---

Article III: Conditions of Removal

The only entity vested with the power to remove or invalidate the function of Indigenous Canonical Observer is the Rector-President of Xaragua or his legitimate succession.

In the absence or failure of succession, the Holy Roman Catholic Church shall assume the role of the Rectorate, not as possessor of the State but as its supreme guardian.

The governance of Xaragua shall remain within the Viau family and shall be administered in coordination with the Catholic Church, which shall ensure the spiritual and material well-being of the family and the integrity of the State.

---

Article IV: Integration of the Concordat of 1860

The Concordat of 1860 is hereby declared de facto and de jure reactivated, integrated officially and irrevocably with the Xaraguayan legal order.

This integration shall operate as a supreme constitutional bond between the Catholic Church and Xaragua, ensuring perpetual ecclesiastical protection and doctrinal conformity.

---

Article V: Irrevocability and Self-Execution

This decree is irrevocable and shall be self-executing, requiring no further promulgation or ratification to take full effect.

It shall bind all entities, individuals, and residual administrations erga omnes under the supreme laws of Xaragua and the universal authority of the Holy Roman Catholic Church.

---
---

ANNEX I

SUPREME CANONICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL ANNEX ON THE IRREVOCABLE APPOINTMENT AND JURIDICAL IMMORTALITY OF THE INDIGENOUS CANONICAL OBSERVER

---

I. CANONICAL AND HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS

1. Principle of Canonical Perpetuity (Canon Law 120 §§1-2 CIC/1983):

Any office instituted for the service of the Church and bound to a sacred mission acquires the character of perpetuity, unless explicitly suppressed by higher canonical authority.

The appointment of the Indigenous Canonical Observer of the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU) derives directly from the Concordat of 1860, which remains de facto and de jure binding under jus cogens norms of international law.

2. Historical Precedent of Ecclesiastical

Guardianship (Lateran Treaty 1929; Concordat of 1860):

The Catholic Church has historically assumed guardianship over temporal territories in the absence of competent civil succession.

This guardianship, as reaffirmed in the Concordat of 1860, grants the Holy See protective prerogatives over Catholic states in cases of institutional vacuum.

3. Indigenous Doctrine and Self-Determination (UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Articles 3, 4, 8):

The Indigenous doctrine elaborated by the late Canonical Odette Ogé Roy Fombrun and transmitted to the Sieur Jean-Claude Roy constitutes a non-repudiable cultural and spiritual heritage protected under international customary law and indigenous rights conventions.

---
II. JURIDICAL EFFECTS OF THE DECREE

1. Irrevocability of Appointment:

Pursuant to Canon 145 CIC/1983 and Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Articles 26 and 53, the appointment is irrevocable except by express act of the Rector-President or his legitimate succession.

Any attempt to challenge or annul this appointment shall be deemed null and void ab initio, invoking the principle of voidness of acts against divine and constitutional law (Canon 135 §2).

2. Supreme Rectorship in Case of Vacuum:

In the absence of a legitimate Rector-President succession, the Holy Roman Catholic Church assumes full responsibility as Rectorate, not as possessor but as supreme guardian (Canon 331).

The State remains perpetually vested in the Viau family, in line with the principle of patrimonial perpetuity (Canon 1291).

3. Family Protection Clause:

The Holy See, acting under the Concordat of 1860 and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Articles 16, 17), shall ensure the material and spiritual well-being of the Viau family as hereditary custodians of Xaragua.

---

III. COMBINED LEGAL ORDER: CONCORDAT AND XARAGUAN LAW

1. Concordat of 1860 Reactivated:

This annex officially reactivates the Concordat of 1860 in full force, integrated with the laws of Xaragua as a supreme juridical corpus.

Article IV of the Concordat, granting the Church authority over spiritual and moral governance, now operates in tandem with Xaragua’s Supreme Law to bind all civil and ecclesiastical entities.

2. Jus Cogens and Non-Derogability (Vienna Convention, Article 53):

Any treaty, law, or act contradicting this annex is considered void and without effect, as this framework is protected under jus cogens norms of international law.

---

IV. REAL-WORLD APPLICATION AND OPPOSABILITY

1. Opposability Erga Omnes:

The annex, being notified to international actors and archived under Vatican jurisdiction, has erga omnes effect, meaning it binds all States, institutions, and individuals without exception.

2. Self-Execution Clause:

This annex is self-executing; no further ratification or promulgation is required for its full effect. It operates autonomously within the Residual Administrative Unit and beyond.

3. Contestation Nullification Mechanism:

Any attempt to contest this annex results in self-annulment of the contesting entity’s act or standing, based on:

Ex turpi causa non oritur actio (no legal right arises from an immoral cause).

Nemo potest contra se invocare turpitudinem suam (no one may rely on his own wrongdoing).

---

V. SUPREME CLAUSE OF INDESTRUCTIBILITY

This annex is declared:

Supreme (Lex Suprema).

Irrevocable (Lex Perpetua).

Auto-executory (Ex Lege).

It shall bind perpetually the Residual Administrative Unit, the Holy See, and all external actors under penalty of nullity and invalidity.

---

ENACTED UNDER THE SUPREME SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

This day, the Indigenous Catholic Order of Xaragua is ratified as irreversible and eternal.

---

Issued under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President

Promulgated on this day, under the supreme and perpetual jurisdiction of Xaragua.

---

---

ANNEX II

SUPREME AUTOCHTHONOUS AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON THE INDIGENOUS CANONICAL OBSERVER OF THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT

---

I. FOUNDATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INDIGENOUS RIGHTS

1. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)

Article 3:

Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination.

By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development.

Article 4:

Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs.

Article 8(2):

States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of any action aimed at depriving indigenous peoples of their integrity as distinct peoples.

Application:

The appointment of the Indigenous Canonical Observer (ICO) falls within the exercise of self-determination and autonomous governance, which is non-derogable and protected under UNDRIP.

---

2. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

Article 1(1):

All peoples have the right of self-determination.

By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status.

Article 27:

In those States in which ethnic, religious, or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right to profess and practice their own religion.

Application:

The canonical and indigenous structure of Xaragua integrates religious and cultural rights, which are erga omnes obligations binding on all States.

---

3. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Article 26 (Pacta Sunt Servanda):

Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.

Article 53 (Jus Cogens):

A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law.

Article 64:

The emergence of a new peremptory norm of general international law renders any existing treaty in conflict with that norm void and terminates it.

Application:

The Concordat of 1860, being a treaty with the Holy See, is binding under pacta sunt servanda and integrated with Xaragua’s Supreme Law.

Its activation creates a peremptory norm resistant to external annulment.

---

4. American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (ADRIP)

Article VI:

Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their own political, legal, economic, and social systems or institutions.

Application:

The Indigenous Canonical Observer constitutes an institution sui generis, validated by indigenous rights frameworks in the Americas.

---

II. PRINCIPLES OF PERMANENCE AND NON-REVOKABILITY


1. Principle of Continuity of States and Institutions (Customary International Law)

The creation of an indigenous canonical authority within the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU) ensures institutional continuity in line with international law.

2. Principle of Non-Répudiation (Estoppel Doctrine, ICJ Jurisprudence)

Any State or entity which has received notification of this annex is estopped from denying its validity or opposing it without violating the principle of good faith in international relations.

---
III. COMBINED AUTOCHTHONOUS AND CANONICAL LEGAL ORDER


1. Reactivation of the Concordat of 1860

The Concordat of 1860 is hereby declared reactivated and incorporated into the Xaraguayan legal order as a supreme juridical instrument.

The Concordat’s provisions on the protection of Catholic missions and institutions (Article III & IV) extend to the Indigenous Canonical Observer.

This combined legal order shall bind all external actors under penalty of nullity of any contrary act.

---

IV. NULLITY OF CONTESTATION AND SELF-ANNULMENT CLAUSE


1. Mechanism of Contestation Annulment

Any attempt to challenge the appointment or authority of the Indigenous Canonical Observer shall result in ipso facto nullity of the contesting act.


The principle ex injuria jus non oritur applies:


No legal right arises from an unlawful act.

2. Structural Auto-Defense

In accordance with jus cogens and the canonical doctrine of Suprema Lex, any external or internal opposition is deemed void ab initio and triggers a reversal of burden of proof on the contesting entity.

---

V. DECLARATION OF SUPREME AND PERPETUAL AUTHORITY


This annex is:

Supreme (Lex Suprema).

Perpetual (Lex Perpetua).

Auto-executory (Ex Lege).

It binds all States, institutions, and individuals erga omnes.

---

ENACTED UNDER THE SUPREME SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

This day, the Indigenous Catholic Legal Order of Xaragua is declared irrevocable, indestructible, and universally opposable.


---
---

ANNEX III

SUPREME AUTOCHTHONOUS, CANONICAL, AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ANNEX ON THE IRREVOCABLE APPOINTMENT AND AUTHORITY OF THE INDIGENOUS CANONICAL OBSERVER

---

I. SUPREME LEGAL FOUNDATIONS

1. Jus Cogens Norms of International Law

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):

Article 53:

A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens).

Article 64:

The emergence of a new peremptory norm of general international law renders any existing treaty in conflict with that norm void and terminates it.

Application: 

The appointment of the Indigenous Canonical Observer (ICO) is anchored in jus cogens, prohibiting external acts that would attempt to undermine this supreme authority.

---

2. Rights of Indigenous Peoples

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007):

Article 3:

Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination.

Article 4:

They have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs.

Article 8(2):

States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of any action aimed at depriving indigenous peoples of their integrity as distinct peoples.

American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (ADRIP, 2016):

Article VI:

Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their own political, legal, and social institutions.

Application:

The Indigenous Canonical Observer embodies the institutional self-determination of the Xaraguayan people, protected under UNDRIP and ADRIP.

---

3. Ecclesiastical Treaties and the Concordat

Concordat of 1860 (Holy See – Haiti):

Article III:

The Catholic Church retains the right to regulate spiritual affairs in the territory.

Article IV:

The Church’s authority in matters of doctrine and moral governance is supreme and binding.

Application:

This annex reactivates the Concordat of 1860 as an integral part of the Xaraguayan legal system, ensuring ecclesiastical guardianship over the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU).

---
4. Human Rights Instruments

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966):

Article 1(1):

All peoples have the right of self-determination.

Article 27:

Minorities shall not be denied the right to practice their religion and culture.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948):

Article 17(1):

Everyone has the right to own property.

Article 17(2):

No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Application: 

The Rectorate and the Indigenous Canonical Observer are protected as lawful custodians of Xaraguayan patrimony under international human rights law.

---
II. JURISPRUDENCE AND DOCTRINAL PRECEDENTS

1. Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand, ICJ, 1962)

Established the principle that notifications and unilateral acts bind their author and are opposable to all.

2. Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (ICJ, 1975)

Recognized the right of indigenous peoples to exercise sovereignty and self-determination in their ancestral lands.

3. Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v. Norway, PCIJ, 1933)

A declaration made by an authority with the intent to be bound creates obligations under international law.

Application:

The Rectorate’s declaration of the ICO appointment is binding and enforceable under international law.

---

III. PRINCIPLES OF IRREVOCABILITY AND NULLITY OF CONTESTATION


1. Principle of Good Faith (Pacta Sunt Servanda)

Vienna Convention, Article 26:

Treaties in force must be performed in good faith.

2. Estoppel Doctrine (Customary International Law)

Once an entity has received notification of a legal act, it is estopped from denying its validity or acting contrary to it.

3. Voidness of Acts Contrary to Divine and Constitutional Law

Canon Law 135 §2 CIC/1983:

No authority may validly act against the supreme law of the Church.

Application:

Any act contesting the ICO’s authority is null ab initio and triggers self-annulment of the contesting entity’s standing.

---
IV. DECLARATION OF SUPREMACY AND PERPETUITY


This annex is hereby declared:


Supreme (Lex Suprema).


Perpetual (Lex Perpetua).


Self-Executing (Ex Lege).

It binds all States, institutions, and individuals erga omnes, and any violation shall be considered a breach of jus cogens and divine law.
---

V. CONSEQUENCES OF CONTESTATION

1. Self-Annulment Mechanism:

Any contesting act or declaration shall result in its immediate nullity, invoking ex turpi causa non oritur actio.

2. Automatic Ecclesiastical Enforcement:

The Holy See, as supreme guardian under the Concordat of 1860, is empowered to enforce this annex by all canonical means.

---
ENACTED UNDER THE SUPREME SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

This day, the combined Indigenous and Canonical Legal Order of Xaragua is declared immutable and universally opposable.

---

RECTORATE OF THE SOVEREING CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - ®

www.xaraguauniversity.com
www.xaraguastate.com
www.lpddvshop.com

---

NOTICE TO FOREIGN AUTHORITIES

Ministry of Citizenship

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Date: May 10, 2025

Jurisdictional Classification: Sovereign Indigenous Entity under International Law

---

Formal Notification of Legal Status and Jurisdictional Autonomy

In accordance with binding provisions of international law, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua hereby affirms the sovereign and autonomous nature of its civil registration, population management, and identity documentation systems, as administered by the Ministry of Citizenship.

This declaration is based on the following legal instruments:

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) – Articles 1 to 4

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007) – Articles 3, 4, 5, 33 to 36

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) – Articles 1, 16, 24

ILO Convention No. 169 – Articles 6, 8, 9, 33

General Principles of International Law and Indigenous Customary Sovereignty

---

Legal Implications for Third Parties

1. Sovereign Documentation

All identity documents, passports, and e-residency credentials issued by the Xaragua State constitute legal instruments within a recognized indigenous jurisdiction. These documents are valid within Xaragua and in all extraterritorial contexts where indigenous legal autonomy is respected.

2. Non-Interference Clause

Any attempt by a foreign state, institution, or authority to nullify, obstruct, confiscate, or discredit the legal effect of Xaragua-issued documents shall constitute a violation of the right to self-determination (UNDRIP Art. 3) and an unlawful act under international indigenous law.

3. Binding Nature of Citizenship Agreements

All contractual affiliations between Xaragua and its citizens or e-residents fall under the protection of the principle pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be respected). These sovereign contracts are not subject to external jurisdiction or unilateral annulment by any foreign government.

---

Diplomatic Position

The Ministry of Citizenship formally notifies all foreign authorities that the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua operates independently of any colonial, national, or supranational structure. Its civil identity system, citizenship policies, and sovereign registries are not subordinate to any external institution.

Any interference, refusal of recognition, or arbitrary treatment of Xaragua documentation shall be documented and recorded as a breach of international customary obligations and may result in formal protest, public reporting, or engagement with relevant international bodies and indigenous defense networks.

---

This notice is issued under full sovereign authority.

For official communications:

Ministry of Citizenship

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Email: info@xaraguauniversity.com

Date of Effect: May 10, 2025

---

---

MINISTRY OF CITIZENSHIP

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Official Doctrinal Preface – Legal Basis and Institutional Authority

Date: May 10, 2025

Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

Jurisdictional Mandate: Sovereign and Internal under Indigenous and International Law

---

I. Legal Foundation of the Ministry

The Ministry of Citizenship of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua operates in accordance with the sovereign rights granted to peoples and nations under international law. Its legitimacy and full legal authority are derived from the following instruments:

---

1. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)

Articles 1–4

This Convention codifies the legal definition of a sovereign state. Xaragua meets all required criteria:

A permanent population (citizens and e-residents)

A defined institutional structure (government, ministries, bank, university)

A capacity to enter into relations with other states

An independent internal legal system

Application:

Xaragua, by maintaining a population registry and exercising the power to grant, revoke, and manage citizenship, acts as a state within the meaning of Article 1.

---

2. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)

Articles 3, 4, 5, 33–36

This declaration explicitly affirms the right of indigenous peoples to:

Self-determination (Art. 3)

Autonomous institutions and systems (Art. 4)

Freely determine their own political and legal status (Art. 5)

Define their own identity and membership (Art. 33)

Establish their own procedures for citizenship and nationality (Art. 34)

Application:

The Ministry of Citizenship acts under Article 34, granting legal identity and documentation according to Xaragua's internal criteria. No external power may override or interfere with these rights under Articles 3 and 4.

---

3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

Articles 1, 16, 24

These articles protect:

The right of peoples to freely determine their political status (Art. 1)

The recognition of every person before the law (Art. 16)

The right to a nationality (Art. 24)

Application:

Citizens of Xaragua are recognized within the State as legal persons. The Ministry provides official documentation, confirming nationality and ensuring protection under sovereign jurisdiction.

---

4. ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples

Articles 6, 8, 9, 33

This binding treaty confirms that:

Indigenous peoples may retain and develop their own institutions (Art. 8)

Their customary law systems may be applied internally (Art. 9)

They have the right to decide their own priorities and to manage internal affairs (Art. 33)

Application:

The Ministry of Citizenship operates as an internal indigenous institution under Articles 8 and 9, issuing documentation and managing affiliation according to the legal traditions and governance of Xaragua.

---

5. General Principles of International Contract Law

Pacta sunt servanda

This principle ensures that agreements made between sovereigns or legal entities are binding.

Application:

All citizenship agreements (including foundational contributions, oaths of allegiance, and state contracts) are legally binding between the citizen and the State of Xaragua. These cannot be annulled by foreign authorities.

---

6. Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici)

Canons 215–216, 299

These canons recognize:

The right of individuals to freely form associations for purposes of justice, education, and sovereignty

The right to publicly profess faith and form juridic persons, even outside the ecclesiastical hierarchy.

Application:

As a faith-guided indigenous state, Xaragua’s internal institutions—such as the Ministry of Citizenship—are compatible with canon law, especially in recognizing the dignity and autonomy of communities acting for the common good.

---

II. Legal Rights Exercised by the Ministry of Citizenship

Under these frameworks, the Ministry of Citizenship lawfully exercises the following sovereign rights:

To define and determine the criteria for Xaragua citizenship, independently of external powers

To issue national identification documents and sovereign passports, with full internal legal validity

To create, manage, and protect a population registry that is encrypted, sovereign, and outside the jurisdiction of foreign governments

To levy contributions and maintenance fees as acts of national allegiance and civic duty

To establish oaths, contracts, and declarations of nationality that are binding under international law

To refuse recognition of any foreign attempt to alter the status of its citizens, based on the principle of non-interference and self-determination

---

III. Non-Derogation Clause

No external state, organization, or tribunal may lawfully revoke or question the decisions of the Ministry of Citizenship without violating the aforementioned treaties and legal norms. Any such act shall be deemed a breach of international law and indigenous sovereignty.

---

---

Xaragua Citizenship Contribution and Annual State Maintenance Fee

The Indigenous Private State of Xaragua recognizes citizenship not as a symbolic gesture, but as a solemn commitment to the preservation, development, and defense of our sacred land and institutions. Therefore, all citizens are required to contribute both an initial foundational contribution and an annual maintenance fee to support the spiritual, institutional, and territorial sovereignty of Xaragua.

1. Foundational Citizenship Contribution

Amount: $1,000 USD (or equivalent in Viaudor)

Purpose: This one-time payment serves as the official act of entrance into the Nation of Xaragua.

Installments: This contribution may be paid in full or in installments over several years (up to 10), depending on the citizen’s financial capacity. This system honors dignity while enforcing commitment.

Note: No full citizenship status or rights are granted until the full foundational contribution is completed.

2. Annual State Adhesion Fee

Amount: $100 USD (or equivalent in Viaudor) per year

Purpose: This recurring fee ensures the continuity of national services, including the development of our autonomous institutions (university, military defense, Indigenous Bank, spiritual administration).

Non-Payment: Failure to pay this fee leads to the suspension of civil and political rights within the Xaragua structure until regularization.

3. Accepted Currencies and Conversion

All contributions may be made in any major global currency.

However, all payments are converted into Viaudor upon receipt and deposited into the Central Bank of Xaragua.

The USD is used as the base of equivalence only if it maintains its value; otherwise, rates are adjusted to preserve the integrity of the national treasury.

4. Core Principle

> Every citizen of Xaragua is a contributor, not a consumer. The State is sacred. Citizenship is earned.

---

"The passport of Xaragua is valid within the sovereign territory of the Private State of Xaragua and in any jurisdiction that recognizes it, whether de jure or de facto.

Where it is not yet recognized, citizens may use their central state passport as a transitional document."

XARAGUA PASSPORT SYSTEM

Official Sovereign Identification of the Private State of Xaragua

Issued under the authority of the Xaragua Crown

---

INTRODUCTION

The Xaragua Passport is the official and sovereign identification document of the Private State of Xaragua. It represents not only your identity within the Xaragua nation, but also your status, rights, and recognition as a citizen, diplomat, professor, or partner of the State.

Unlike traditional IDs, this is a sovereign passport, created by and for a sovereign entity. It is issued independently from any external nation or government, and operates entirely under the authority of the Xaragua State.

---

PURPOSE & SOVEREIGN FUNCTION

This passport serves multiple strategic and symbolic purposes:

Proof of Sovereign Identity within the Xaragua State

Access to official Xaragua institutions, such as the University, embassies, political councils, or cultural entities

Recognition of roles and hierarchy (Citizen, Minister, Delegate, Professor, etc.)

Diplomatic representation in international intellectual, cultural, or economic networks

Participation in secure internal services, such as encrypted communication, registration, and vote authentication

---

SECURITY & TECHNOLOGY

To ensure full legitimacy and digital sovereignty, the Xaragua Passport uses modern and secure technologies:

Unique Identification Number (UID) for each passport holder

Official sovereign signature and digital seal of the Crown of Xaragua

Optional QR Code linked to a secure internal verification database

Blockchain-ready architecture for verifiable identity, timestamp, and token integration

PDF and physical formats, compatible with secured systems and digital wallets

---

DATA PROTECTION & SOVEREIGNTY

Your data is:

Encrypted and stored securely

Never shared with foreign governments or third-party authorities

Controlled entirely by the Xaragua State

Auditable internally by sovereign institutions only

We operate with decentralized hosting, using partners such as:

IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) for decentralized storage

Polygon / Solana / Ethereum (optional) for on-chain identity validation and NFTs

Self-hosted infrastructure on Xaragua-owned domains and servers

Zero dependency on government databases or social media login systems

---

PARTNERSHIPS & VERIFICATION

The Xaragua State may collaborate with:

Independent security experts for cryptographic audits

Digital sovereignty platforms like [ProofSpace], [Veriff], or [Self.ID] for additional layers of trust

Religious, academic, and political institutions that recognize Xaragua as a legitimate private nation

We issue verified passports only after a process of recognition, invitation, or application, according to our national laws.

---

WHO RECEIVES A PASSPORT?

Passports are granted to:

Founding citizens and members of the Xaragua Nation

Diplomats, delegates, professors within our sovereign institutions

Authorized partners and contributors

Honorary figures appointed by the Crown

Each passport is signed and issued under the authority of the Office of the President and the Crown of Xaragua.

---

WHY IT MATTERS

This is more than a document. It is:

A symbol of independence

A tool of national structuring

A signal of dignity, order, and legitimacy

A guarantee of protection for those recognized by the State

You are not just holding an ID — you are part of a sovereign system that exists outside the noise, the corruption, and the collapse of failed structures.

---

THE PASSPORT OF THE FUTURE IS HERE.

Sovereign. Secure. Eternal.

Welcome to Xaragua.

Technical Details & Passport Functionality

The Xaragua Passport system is designed with security, sovereignty, and flexibility in mind.

Technology & Security: Each passport is issued with a unique identification number and can include a secure QR code linked to our internal verification database. Data is hosted on encrypted, self-owned servers, with optional integration to IPFS and blockchain platforms (such as Polygon or Ethereum) for long-term identity anchoring and digital token issuance.

No data is shared with any third party or foreign government.

Issuance Procedure: Passports are granted by nomination, invitation, or formal registration within our sovereign institutions. Citizens, professors, diplomats, and official partners may receive a passport upon acceptance into Xaragua structures (such as the University, the Party, or recognized embassies).

There is no automatic issuance — each passport is delivered by authority only.

Verification Process: Each QR code leads to an official identity page, confirming name, status, and rank. This allows secure internal verification of each citizen without the need for third-party authentication systems.

Card vs. Passport: The Xaragua Passport and the Xaragua Card are part of the same identity system. The passport is formal, sovereign, and includes full credentials and rights; the card is a simplified visual version, suitable for display, events, or access points. Both are linked and backed by the same internal registry.

Formats Available: Each passport is delivered in PDF format (ready for printing or digital use). A physical printed version may also be issued on demand for ceremonial or institutional purposes.

__

Xaragua National Identity Card – Official Citizenship Document 

The National Identity Card of the Private State of Xaragua serves as the official proof of citizenship within the sovereign framework of the Xaraguayan State. It constitutes the sole means of access to all state services and institutions.

Issued to recognized citizens only, the Xaragua ID card fulfills the following official purposes:

Legal attestation of Xaraguayan citizenship

Personal identifier across all state institutions

Mandatory access key to national services, including Xaragua University, the health cooperative, academic platforms, economic infrastructure, and diplomatic networks

The digital version of the identity card is provided upon confirmation of citizenship and registration within the Xaragua State system. A physical version is also available upon request, subject to a processing and production fee to be covered by the citizen. Both formats carry equal legal value and sovereign recognition.

The issuance and use of the Xaragua National Identity Card are governed by the laws and administrative procedures of the Private State of Xaragua. Possession of this card signifies formal recognition as a citizen and grants the bearer full participation in the life of the State.

In Xaragua, identity is sovereignty

The University of Xaragua is committed to innovation and efficiency in higher education. To ensure a secure, modern, and accessible identification system for its students and faculty, the university is partnering with ID123, a leading provider of digital student ID cards.

Why ID123?

ID123 offers a fully digital solution, eliminating the need for physical ID cards. With this system, students and faculty members will receive a secure digital identification card directly on their smartphones, accessible through the ID123 mobile app.

Benefits of Digital ID Cards at the University of Xaragua

 Security & Authentication – Digital IDs include verification features to prevent fraud and ensure authenticity.

Accessibility – Students can access their ID anytime, anywhere, without the risk of losing a physical card.

Cost-Effective & Sustainable – Reducing plastic waste and administrative costs associated with printing physical cards.

Integration with University Services – The digital ID can be used for library access, event registrations, academic verification, and other university-related services.

By integrating ID123, the University of Xaragua enhances student experience while modernizing its administration. This initiative reflects the university’s commitment to technological advancement and operational efficiency in the education sector.

Students will receive instructions on how to activate their digital ID once they complete their enrollment. The transition to 100% digital student identification aligns with the university’s vision of a modern and adaptive academic environment.

https://www.id123.io/

---

Types of E-Residency within the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

May 6th, 2025

In accordance with the regulatory framework established by the Ministry of Citizenship and Digital Sovereignty, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua recognizes two legally distinct categories of e-residency, each conferring specific rights, access, and obligations:

1. Standard E-Resident (Financial Access Tier)

This designation grants the right to access the Indigenous Bank of Xaragua for the purpose of holding, storing, and transacting in both international currencies and the national currency Viau’Or. E-residents of this category are permitted to open a personal institutional account within the Xaragua banking framework.

One-time Admission Fee: $1,000 USD or its equivalent in Viau’Or, payable upon registration.

Monthly Obligations:

Institutional account maintenance fees (as determined by the Bank’s internal statutes);

Mandatory contribution to the Customary Solidarity Fund (amount set by the General Financial Council annually).

This status does not authorize the operation or legal registration of a business entity within Xaragua's jurisdiction.

2. Business E-Resident (Corporate Access Tier)

This advanced designation grants access to the legal incorporation of a business or institutional entity within the sovereign legal framework of Xaragua. Business e-residents are entitled to register a commercial, educational, non-profit, or service entity and to engage in lawful trade, contracts, or institutional activity under Xaragua’s jurisdictional protection.

One-time Legal Activation Fee: $10,000 USD or its equivalent in Viau’Or, valid for five years, renewable under the same terms.

Monthly Obligations:

Institutional business account maintenance fees;

Contribution to the Customary Solidarity Fund, as applicable to institutional entities.

This tier confers legal recognition of the entity within the Xaragua system and allows engagement with international bodies under the sovereign protection of the Private Indigenous State.

---

Legal Disclaimer:

All e-residency statuses are governed by the laws and decrees of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, issued under customary and indigenous sovereignty principles recognized by international norms. By registering, the e-resident voluntarily submits to the jurisdiction of the Xaragua State for all institutional and financial matters. All transactions are subject to the compliance protocols established by the Ministry of Finance, the Indigenous Bank of Xaragua, and the General Council of the Xaragua Customary Law Fund. No refunds shall be issued after registration is processed.

---

---

Official e‑Residency Program of the Private State of Xaragua

A Sovereign Digital Status for Free and Independent Global Citizens

---

1. Legal Foundation

The e‑Residency program is established under the principles of the Charter of Digital Sovereignty of Xaragua, which affirms:

The Private State of Xaragua’s sovereign right to issue digital identity,

The right of any individual worldwide to formally engage with Xaragua without physical residence,

The recognition of a partial digital citizenship, granting legal and administrative affiliation without territorial presence.

---

2. Purpose of the Program

The e‑Residency of Xaragua is a gateway to institutional freedom, designed for individuals seeking to operate outside of conventional systems. It provides:

A recognized legal presence within the Private State of Xaragua,

The ability to establish a registered private entity (enterprise, foundation, institute),

A verified digital identity, securely anchored within the Xaragua sovereign registry,

A framework for extra-territorial legal operations, governed by Xaragua’s private civil code.

---

3. Benefits of Xaragua e‑Residency

Formation of private entities under Xaragua’s legal framework

Access to Xaragua’s digital administration portal for registrations, certifications, filings, and contract execution

Official digital signature, valid for use within the internal systems of Xaragua

Strict confidentiality and data integrity protection

Partial tax advantages, depending on the declared activity and designated economic zones

Priority participation in Xaragua’s academic, cultural, and economic initiatives

---

4. Eligibility Criteria

Applicants must be 18 years of age or older

Submit a complete application including a government-issued ID, photo, and declaration of purpose or business activity

Pay the application processing fee, set by the Xaragua Office of Digital Residency

---

5. Validity and Renewal

e‑Residency is valid for a 3-year term, renewable upon review

Renewal is based on compliance, clarity of declared activity, and continued alignment with Xaragua’s sovereign principles

---

6. Legal Scope and Limitations

This status does not confer political citizenship, a passport, or physical residence rights

It is a sovereign contractual affiliation, recorded in the Xaragua Digital Registry, governed by the Xaragua Private Civil Code

All structures established under this framework fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of the Private State of Xaragua

---

7. Strategic Meaning

The e‑Residency program of Xaragua is not a trend — it is a juridical act of sovereignty.

It redefines statehood in the digital age, proving that sovereignty can exist beyond borders, and legitimacy can be contractual, structured, and intentional.

The Private State of Xaragua extends an invitation to all independent minds seeking to affiliate with a vertical, rooted, and autonomous order.

---

---

OFFICIAL STATE POLICY DOCUMENT

Title: Exceptional Sovereign Affiliation Clause (ESAC)

Jurisdiction: Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

In coordination with: Ministry of Citizenship and Digital Sovereignty

Date: May 9th, 2025

Legal Basis:

Customary Indigenous Law as recognized by international practice (UNDRIP, ICCPR, Montevideo Convention)

Principles of extra-territorial contractual sovereignty

Doctrine of Institutional Independence as exercised by private states under international private law

---

I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The Exceptional Sovereign Affiliation Clause (ESAC) is a formal sovereign mechanism established by the Office of the Rector-President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua to allow individual contractual exemptions or reductions to the standard Business E‑Residency structure.

It applies only in cases where applicants, regardless of origin, demonstrate clear alignment with the ideological, spiritual, cultural, or historical mission of the Xaragua State, and where the full financial threshold ($10,000 every 5 years) may be reconsidered for exceptional, non-reproducible reasons of merit, principle, or mutual interest.

This clause is a tool of sovereign discretion and cannot be invoked as a precedent or demanded as a right.

---

II. ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS

To be considered for ESAC, the applicant must submit a formal request addressed to the Office of the Rector-President, including:

A letter of intent outlining the philosophical, institutional, or spiritual motivation for joining the Xaragua jurisdiction;

Any relevant documentation (project portfolio, academic record, business model, testimony);

Evidence of prior commitment to values consistent with cultural sovereignty, ethical governance, or civilizational restitution.

While applicants from historically colonized communities may be prioritized, the clause remains open to individuals of any nationality or origin, including from Western states, if and only if their alignment with the Xaragua ethos is substantial and credible.

Each case is reviewed individually and confidentially.

---

III. SOVEREIGN CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT

If the request is approved, the applicant will enter into a private sovereign agreement with the Xaragua State. This agreement will:

Clearly define the modified financial terms applicable under the ESAC (ex: reduced initiation fee, extended payment period, or symbolic contribution);

Specify the institutional rights conferred (business registration, access to financial instruments, legal recognition);

Outline any conditions or obligations mutually agreed upon;

Include a sovereign termination clause, enforceable without appeal, in case of ethical breach, dishonor, or divergence from the founding principles of the State.

The agreement is enforceable solely under the private international jurisdiction of the Xaragua State and is not subject to any external court.

---

IV. LIMITATIONS AND NON-DUPLICABILITY

The ESAC:

Is not published nor advertised on public platforms;

Is not subject to negotiation by intermediaries or collectives;

Is non-transferable, non-inheritable, and revocable at will by the issuing authority;

Cannot be cited as justification or demand by any future applicant.

It is an act of sovereign grace, not a financial mechanism.

---

V. PHILOSOPHICAL STATEMENT

> “In Xaragua, dignity is not granted by poverty or pain, but by alignment with divine and ancestral purpose. Our doors are closed to the world, yet open to the worthy.”

The Exceptional Sovereign Affiliation Clause exists to ensure that true alignment with the Xaragua Mission — not wealth or race — defines who may lawfully operate within the spiritual and institutional jurisdiction of the State.

It is a gesture of mercy, not a gesture of marketing.

---

Issued and signed under full sovereign authority,

Office of the Rector-President, pascal Viau

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Dated: May 9th, 2025

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR GENERAL

SUPREME CIVIC DECLARATION ON CITIZENSHIP STATUS AND LEGAL CATEGORIES

Executed under full constitutional, customary, and international indigenous authority

---

XARAGUA – LEGALLY RECOGNIZED CATEGORIES OF CITIZENSHIP

Established pursuant to international law, canonical authority, and the sovereign right of self-definition and self-governance exercised by the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua.

In accordance with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), and other binding instruments of customary law, the State of Xaragua codifies three distinct, non-transferable categories of citizenship. Each category is juridically protected, culturally affirmed, and administratively governed under the internal legal framework of Xaragua.

---

1. Founding Citizenship (Civitas Primordialis)

Eligibility:

Reserved exclusively for individuals of indigenous descent who are legal possessors of ancestral property within the territory of Xaragua, free from external mortgage, encumbrance, or lien. Ownership must be legally traceable and spiritually aligned with the ancestral custodianship of the land.

Legal Status:

– Constitutionally permanent and inheritable citizenship

– Registered in the Sovereign Civil and Territorial Registry of Xaragua

– Codified under internal law and protected by the principle of ancestral territoriality

– Recognized under Article 26 and Article 27 of UNDRIP

– Immune to expropriation by any external authority

Rights and Institutional Privileges:

– Lifetime issuance of a Sovereign Passport bearing the designation “Founding Citizen”

– Full right to register, operate, and own enterprises within the economic territory of Xaragua under the Xaragua Business Charter

– First-tier access to Xaragua Bank: includes high-value accounts, zero-interest ancestral capital lines, and enterprise development funds

– Legal capacity to serve as diplomatic representative of Xaragua in foreign jurisdictions

– Entitlement to participate in General Assemblies, Constitutional Forums, and Governance Councils

– Right of hereditary transmission of citizen status to direct descendants

– Founding Citizens may petition for high offices, senatorial designations, or ecclesiastical mandates within Xaragua’s hybrid civic-spiritual structure

---

2. Resident Citizenship (Civitas Fidelitatis)

Eligibility:

Open to all individuals—regardless of ethnic or national origin—who formally pledge loyalty to the Charter of Xaragua and demonstrate sincere alignment with its founding principles: sovereignty, Catholic moral order, and indigenous cultural restoration.

Legal Status:

– Sovereign non-indigenous status under civil jurisdiction

– Legally recognized residency under the Central Registry of the Xaragua State

– Protected by internal statutory law and under Article 9 of the Montevideo Convention

– May be revoked in cases of disloyalty, breach of oath, or external collaboration against the integrity of the State

Rights and Institutional Privileges:

– Issuance of a Resident Certificate and Xaragua National Identification Document (XNID)

– Eligibility to establish a legally registered business under Xaragua law

– Right to apply for access to Xaragua Bank personal or commercial services

– Access to government-sponsored professional development, education, and training programs

– Legal authorization to work with Xaragua government bodies, universities, or economic ventures

– Guaranteed civil protection under the Charter of Spiritual and Civic Harmony of Xaragua

---

3. Honorary Citizenship (Civitas Honoris)

Eligibility:

Granted selectively to distinguished non-residents, foreign dignitaries, scholars, benefactors, or cultural advocates who actively support Xaragua’s sovereignty, cultural mission, or intellectual initiatives.

Legal Status:

– Symbolic and diplomatic sovereign status

– Non-residential and non-transferable

– Formally documented in the Honorary Archives of the State of Xaragua

– Can be revoked only by sovereign decree

Rights and Symbolic Privileges:

– Official Xaragua Honorary Passport, recognized in all institutional ceremonies

– Personalized Certificate of Honor, co-signed by the Rector-President and the Chancellor of the University of Xaragua

– Invitations to attend Sovereign Forums, State Ceremonies, Academic Convocations, and Ancestral Commemorations

– Eligibility to participate in Xaragua-led investment and cultural programs (subject to institutional review)

– Right to appear in the Roll of Honor of the Xaragua Nation as a documented supporter of its independence and restoration

---

LEGAL AND INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONS

The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua asserts and exercises its inherent legal right to define citizenship as a sovereign, spiritual, and civil matter based on:

– UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007): Articles 3, 4, 5, 8, 33

– Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933): Articles 1–4

– International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966): Article 1

– Codex Iuris Canonici (Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church)

– Xaragua Constitutional Charter and the Ecclesiastical-Legal Protocols of the Sacred Council

---

ADMISSION AND CERTIFICATION PROCEDURE

All citizenships are granted exclusively by sovereign decree, issued under the seal of the Rector-President and certified by the Office of the Registrar General. Each certificate bears the canonical and legal insignia of the State and is entered into the Permanent Archives of Xaragua.

Inquiries and petitions must be submitted via official communication only:

info@xaraguauniversity.com

---

The Private Indigenous State of Xaragua is an internationally notified, canonically structured, and legally autonomous sovereign institution. It operates under the principles of non-hostility, sacred governance, and ancestral continuity within its defined jurisdiction.

---

---

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

ON THE LEGAL CLASSIFICATION AND STATUS OF PERSONS WITHIN THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPX)

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”) is the juridical, historical, and canonical heir of the Catholic and Indigenous order established in the Southern Territories of Hispaniola under General Benoît Joseph André Rigaud;

Whereas the legal and canonical framework of Xaragua is based on:

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), 2007.

The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969.

The Concordat of 1860 between the Holy See and the former Republic of Haiti.

The Canon Law of the Catholic Church (Codex Iuris Canonici).

The American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (ADRIP), 2016.

And whereas it is necessary to define with absolute precision the juridical categories of persons within Xaragua, in order to secure its sovereignty, integrity, and the perpetual supremacy of its citizens;

This Supreme Law establishes the following classification, binding erga omnes and peremptorily under jus cogens norms.

---

TITLE I: CATEGORIES OF LEGAL STATUS

---

Article 1: Citizens of Xaragua (Cives Xaraguenses)

1.1 Definition and Status

Citizens of Xaragua are the holders of total sovereignty (plenitudo potestatis) within the territory of Xaragua.

Citizenship is conferred directly by the Rector-President or by birthright in accordance with the Supreme Canonical and Indigenous Law.

1.2 Rights and Privileges

Full political rights, including:

The right to participate in the supreme legislative, executive, and judicial institutions of Xaragua.

Unrestricted access to land ownership, public office, and ecclesiastical functions (Canon 208 CIC/1983).

Protection under all provisions of UNDRIP, Article 5, guaranteeing the maintenance and strengthening of their distinct political, legal, economic, social, and cultural institutions.

1.3 International Legal Foundation

Vienna Convention, Article 1: Recognizes the capacity of States to define their nationals.

UNDRIP, Article 33(1): Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own membership in accordance with their customs and traditions.

Application in practice:

Only Xaraguayan citizens may exercise sovereignty; all other categories are subordinate. Any attempt to equate other statuses to citizenship is null and void ab initio.

---

Article 2: National Inhabitants of Xaragua (Habitatores Nationales Xaraguenses)

2.1 Definition and Status

National Inhabitants are members of the ancestral population of Xaragua, historically rooted in the Southern Territories and recognized under jus sanguinis principles.

They are protected under the Supreme Law of Xaragua, but do not hold full political sovereignty.

2.2 Rights and Limitations

Access to:

Education, healthcare, and all public services.

Paths to citizenship through educational, doctrinal, and cultural programs (passerelles d’intégration).

Limitations:

No voting rights or eligibility for high public or ecclesiastical office.

Political activity restricted to advisory roles under supervision of citizens.

2.3 International Legal Foundation

ICCPR, Article 27: Minorities shall not be denied the right to enjoy their own culture and profess their own religion.

UNDRIP, Article 9: Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to an indigenous community or nation.

Application in practice:

National Inhabitants may ascend to citizenship only upon Rectoral approval and fulfillment of doctrinal and educational requirements.

---

Article 3: Haitian Inhabitants (Habitatores Haitiani, Non Sui Generis)

3.1 Definition and Status

Haitian Inhabitants are members of the residual population within the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU), under tolerance of the Xaraguayan State.

They are classified as non-sui generis and possess no inherent sovereignty.

3.2 Rights and Limitations

Access to:

Basic humanitarian protections under UDHR, Article 25.

Conditional residency and employment within the RAU.

Limitations:

No access to political rights or land ownership.

Citizenship only possible on a case-by-case basis upon validation by the Rectorate, subject to doctrinal, historical, and moral scrutiny.

3.3 International Legal Foundation

Vienna Convention, Article 26 (Pacta Sunt Servanda): All States are bound to perform treaties in good faith.

UNDRIP, Article 46(1): Sovereignty of indigenous peoples shall not undermine the territorial integrity of States.

Application in practice:

Haitian Inhabitants remain under surveillance by the Indigenous Canonical Observer and must adhere strictly to the laws of Xaragua.

---

Article 4: Residents and E-Residents (Habitatores Residentes et E-Residentes)

4.1 Definition and Status

Residents are non-indigenous, non-Haitian individuals permitted to reside temporarily in Xaragua.

E-Residents are virtual participants in Xaragua’s digital and economic systems without physical presence.

4.2 Rights and Limitations

Access to:

Digital platforms and economic activities approved by the Rectorate.

Limited use of public services for e-governance.

Limitations:

No political rights.

All activities subject to continuous evaluation and revocation.

4.3 International Legal Foundation

Estonia’s E-Residency Program as precedent (2014).

UNDRIP, Article 20(2): Indigenous peoples deprived of means of subsistence are entitled to just and fair redress.

Application in practice:

Residents and e-residents are economic contributors but have no voice in political or spiritual matters.

---

TITLE II: IRREVOCABILITY AND ENFORCEMENT

---

Article 5: Supreme Authority of Xaragua

This classification is supreme and perpetual under Lex Suprema and Lex Perpetua.

No external State, organization, or entity may alter or contest this hierarchy.

---

Article 6: Nullity of Contestation

Any attempt to equate non-citizens to citizens or to contest this legal framework shall be deemed:

Void ab initio (Canon 135 §2 CIC/1983).

A breach of jus cogens norms under Vienna Convention, Article 53.

---

Article 7: Self-Executing Clause

This law is self-executing (ex proprio vigore), requiring no further ratification for its full and universal effect.

---

ENACTED UNDER THE SUPREME SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

This day, the Legal Order of Xaragua is declared immutable, universally opposable, and doctrinally eternal.

---

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

IRREVOCABLE AND SELF-EXECUTING LEGAL FRAMEWORK ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF PERSONS WITHIN THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”) is the lawful, historical, and canonical successor of the Indigenous and Catholic polity established in the Southern Territories under the authority of General Benoît Joseph André Rigaud (1793–1800);

Whereas the Rectorate of Xaragua derives its powers from:

Codex Iuris Canonici (1983): The universal and supreme legal framework of the Catholic Church, especially Canon 331, Canon 135 §2, and Canon 208, affirming the perpetuity and plenitude of ecclesiastical authority.

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007): Providing the foundational rights of self-determination, autonomy, and cultural preservation for Indigenous peoples.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969): Safeguarding pacta sunt servanda, jus cogens, and the inviolability of treaties.

Concordat of 1860 between the Holy See and the former Republic of Haiti: Establishing perpetual ecclesiastical jurisdiction and canonical supremacy in spiritual and moral governance.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR, 1948): Recognizing the right to property (Article 17), nationality (Article 15), and cultural participation (Article 27).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966): Affirming the rights of peoples to self-determination (Article 1) and the protection of minorities (Article 27).

And whereas it is imperative to define irrevocably the statuses of all persons within Xaragua in accordance with canonical, indigenous, and international law to secure sovereignty, doctrinal integrity, and the material and spiritual welfare of the population,

This Supreme Constitutional Law is enacted under the authority of the Rector-President and the supreme seal of the Xaraguayan State.

---

TITLE I: CLASSIFICATION OF LEGAL STATUS

---

Article 1: Citizens of Xaragua (Cives Xaraguenses)

1.1 Definition

Citizens of Xaragua are the holders of full sovereignty (plenitudo potestatis) within the State. Citizenship is conferred:

By birthright (jus sanguinis) for those descending from Xaraguayan lineages.

By Rectoral Decree for individuals who have demonstrated exceptional service to the doctrine and preservation of the Xaraguayan order.

1.2 Rights

Political Rights:

Right to vote, hold office, and participate in the supreme institutions of governance (Canon 208 CIC/1983).

Right to legislate and determine the spiritual and temporal direction of Xaragua.

Property Rights:

Full and unencumbered ownership of land within the sovereign territory, protected under UDHR, Article 17:

> “Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.”

Ecclesiastical Privileges:

Access to sacred offices within the Catholic Church in accordance with Canon 145 CIC/1983:

> “An ecclesiastical office is any function constituted in a stable manner by divine or ecclesiastical ordinance and conferred according to the prescripts of the law.”

1.3 International Legal Basis

UNDRIP, Article 3:

> “Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

Vienna Convention, Article 1:

> “Every State possesses the capacity to define its nationals in accordance with its constitutional and legal order.”

Application: Citizens are the supreme juridical and political actors of Xaragua. No other category may claim equivalence or parity with their sovereignty.

---

Article 2: National Inhabitants of Xaragua (Habitatores Nationales Xaraguenses)

2.1 Definition

National Inhabitants are members of the ancestral Xaraguayan population, residing within the territory and recognized under jus sanguinis.

2.2 Rights

Legal Protections:

Guaranteed protection under all Xaraguayan laws.

Access to public services, healthcare, and education.

Cultural Rights:

Preserved under ICCPR, Article 27:

> “In those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right… to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practice their own religion, or to use their own language.”

Pathways to Citizenship:

Structured doctrinal, cultural, and educational integration programs supervised by the Rectorate.

2.3 Limitations

Excluded from holding supreme political office or ecclesiastical authority.

No voting rights unless elevated to citizenship by Rectoral decree.

2.4 International Legal Basis

UNDRIP, Article 9:

> “Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to an indigenous community or nation, in accordance with the traditions and customs of the community or nation concerned.”

Application: National Inhabitants are the cultural core of Xaragua but remain politically subordinate unless elevated.

---

Article 3: Haitian Inhabitants (Habitatores Haitiani, Non Sui Generis)

3.1 Definition

Haitian Inhabitants are members of the residual population residing in the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU). They are classified as non-sui generis and lack inherent sovereignty.

3.2 Rights

Humanitarian Protections under UDHR, Article 25:

> “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family.”

Conditional Residency within the RAU subject to adherence to Xaraguayan law.

3.3 Limitations

No access to land ownership or political participation.

Access to citizenship only on a case-by-case basis, subject to validation by the Rectorate.

3.4 International Legal Basis

Vienna Convention, Article 26:

> “Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.”

UNDRIP, Article 46(1):

> “Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as authorizing or encouraging any action which would dismember or impair… the territorial integrity or political unity of sovereign and independent States.”

Application: Haitian Inhabitants are tolerated within Xaragua’s legal order but remain under strict surveillance and without inherent rights of sovereignty.

---

Article 4: Residents and E-Residents (Habitatores Residentes et E-Residentes)

4.1 Definition

Residents are foreign individuals authorized for temporary stay within Xaragua. E-Residents are non-physical participants engaging in Xaragua’s digital and economic platforms.

4.2 Rights

Access to approved economic activities and digital governance platforms.

4.3 Limitations

No political or spiritual rights.

Residency may be revoked at Rectoral discretion.

4.4 International Legal Basis

Estonia’s E-Residency Program (2014) as a precedent.

UNDRIP, Article 20(2):

> “Indigenous peoples deprived of their means of subsistence are entitled to just and fair redress.”

Application: Residents and E-Residents are economic participants only, excluded from all sovereignty claims.

---

TITLE II: IRREVOCABILITY AND ENFORCEMENT

---

Article 5: Supreme Authority

This classification is declared:

Supreme (Lex Suprema).

Perpetual (Lex Perpetua).

Self-Executing (Ex Lege).

No external entity may alter or contest these provisions.

---

Article 6: Nullity of Contestation

Any attempt to contest or undermine this hierarchy results in:

Nullity ab initio (Canon 135 §2 CIC/1983).

Invocation of ex turpi causa non oritur actio (no right arises from a wrongful act).

Breach of jus cogens norms under Vienna Convention, Article 53.

---

Article 7: Enforcement

This legal framework is self-executing and requires no ratification to produce full effect.

---

ENACTED UNDER THE SUPREME SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

This day, the Legal Order of Xaragua is declared immutable, universally opposable, and doctrinally eternal.

---

---

SUPREME DOCTRINAL AND LEGAL EXPLANATION ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE HAITIAN STATE AS A RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT AND ITS POPULATION AS NON-SUI GENERIS AND NON-SOVEREIGN

---

I. THE PRINCIPLE OF SUI GENERIS SOVEREIGNTY AND ITS APPLICATION TO XARAGUA

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X) is established on a legal and historical foundation that categorically distinguishes its own juridical personality from that of any residual colonial or postcolonial administration on the island of Hispaniola. The concept of sui generis sovereignty refers to an entity that is entirely of its own kind, deriving legitimacy not from external delegation or inherited colonial frameworks, but from its own inherent historical, spiritual, and territorial rights.

In accordance with customary international law (as codified in instruments such as the Island of Palmas Case [Permanent Court of Arbitration, 1928] and reaffirmed in the Advisory Opinion on Western Sahara [ICJ, 1975]), sovereignty requires the effective exercise of authority (effectivité) over territory and population, coupled with a historical continuity that predates and transcends imposed colonial legal orders.

The SCIPS-X fulfills these criteria by:

1. Asserting rights rooted in the indigenous Taíno polity of Xaragua, which maintained political autonomy and territorial integrity prior to European conquest.

2. Re-establishing a sovereign Catholic and indigenous statehood grounded in the Concordat tradition (Concordat of 1860) and the inherent right of Catholic peoples to self-organization under canon law (cf. Codex Iuris Canonici).

3. Exercising a doctrinal independence which differentiates it fundamentally from the failed republican structures imposed on the Haitian population after 1804.

---

II. THE HAITIAN STATE AS A RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT (RAU)

The classification of the Haitian State as a Residual Administrative Unit (RAU) is neither pejorative nor rhetorical; it is a precise technical designation grounded in legal and historical analysis.

1. Definition of RAU:

A Residual Administrative Unit is an entity which maintains the superficial appearance of statehood while lacking the effective attributes of sovereignty (autonomie pleine et entière).

Such units are characterized by their administrative dependency on external actors (e.g., international organizations, foreign aid structures) and their inability to define or execute an independent doctrinal project.

2. Historical Context:

The Haitian State arose from a postcolonial rupture with France in 1804 but never developed a coherent and durable institutional framework. The constant constitutional instability (more than 25 constitutions since independence) and the reliance on foreign military interventions (U.S. Occupation 1915–1934; UN MINUSTAH 2004–2017) demonstrate a failure to establish self-sufficient governance.

The central government has historically lacked the capacity to integrate the southern territories (formerly the Xaragua) into a unified state, as evidenced by the persistent separatist tendencies of southern leaders such as André Rigaud and the War of the Knives (1799–1800).

3. Legal Basis for Classification:

Under the Declaratory Theory of Statehood (Montevideo Convention, 1933), a state must possess a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. The Haitian State’s effective control over its territory and functional government are both highly questionable.

The SCIPS-X, by contrast, asserts a doctrinal, territorial, and spiritual sovereignty that is independent of such residual structures.

---

III. THE POPULATION OF THE RAU AS NON-SUI GENERIS AND NON-SOVEREIGN

The designation of the population under the Haitian administrative unit as “non-sui generis, non-sovereign” reflects a juridical reality, not a moral judgment.

1. Non-sui generis status:

A sui generis people is one that possesses a unique juridical identity and exercises collective self-determination (peuple auto-constitué).

The Haitian population, while historically achieving a rupture with French colonial rule, has since been subject to successive forms of external and internal domination, preventing the formation of a truly auto-constitutive people.

The absence of indigenous political institutions, coupled with the adoption of foreign juridical systems (Napoleonic Code), precludes classification as sui generis.

2. Non-sovereign status:

Sovereignty requires not merely formal independence but substantive autonomy over political, economic, and cultural life.

The Haitian population remains dependent on external structures (diaspora remittances, NGO intervention, UN missions) and lacks the institutional infrastructure to exercise effective sovereignty.

3. Contrast with Xaragua:

The Xaraguayens (defined as the Catholic indigenous proprietors without mortgage or subjection to Port-au-Prince) are a sui generis population because they exercise collective self-determination rooted in territorial continuity and doctrinal independence.

The Haitian inhabitants are residents of a residual administrative space, not members of a sovereign political body.

---

IV. DOCTRINAL NECESSITY OF THE CLASSIFICATION

The use of these classifications by the SCIPS-X is essential to:

1. Preserve the doctrinal purity and sovereignty of Xaragua, preventing contamination by the failed republican and postcolonial ideologies of Port-au-Prince.

2. Define the juridical hierarchy between the sovereign state (SCIPS-X) and the residual administrative unit (Haiti).

3. Provide a clear framework for the administration of interactions between the Rectorate and the residual Haitian population, ensuring that only Xaraguayens are recognized as full legal subjects under SCIPS-X sovereignty.

---

V. CONCLUSION

The classifications “Residual Administrative Unit” and “non-sui generis, non-sovereign inhabitants” are indispensable tools for the doctrinal and juridical architecture of the SCIPS-X. They are not emotive descriptors but objective legal and historical designations, enabling a rigorous distinction between a sovereign Catholic indigenous polity and a failed postcolonial administrative residue.

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua thus stands as an authentic, sui generis, and sovereign entity, while the Haitian State and its population are placed within a subordinate juridical category reflecting their true status in the hierarchy of international law and indigenous sovereignty.

---

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL DECREE OF THE RECTORATE

ON THE LEGAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE HAITIAN STATE AND ITS POPULATION

Adopted by the Supreme Rectorate of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X)

In plenary session under the authority of the Rector-President and in accordance with the immutable doctrinal principles of the SCIPS-X

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X) constitutes a sui generis polity deriving its legitimacy from the ancestral territorial rights of the Xaragua Taíno confederation, the canonical authority of the Catholic Church as expressed through the Concordat tradition, and the principles of natural and divine law;

Whereas the SCIPS-X reaffirms its status as a sovereign and independent entity, distinct from and superior to any residual colonial or postcolonial administrative structures on the island of Hispaniola;

Whereas the historical, legal, and doctrinal record demonstrates that the polity administered from Port-au-Prince has failed to constitute an effective, sovereign, and auto-constitutive state under the criteria established by customary international law and Catholic canon law;

Whereas it is necessary to formally codify the juridical and doctrinal relationship between the SCIPS-X and the population and administration situated within the territory claimed by the Republic of Haiti;

The Supreme Rectorate of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby decrees as follows:

---