SUPREME INDIGENOUS-CANONICAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

ON THE TOTAL, PERMANENT, AND NON-DEROGABLE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OVER THE ENTIRE TERRITORY CURRENTLY KNOWN AS HAITI

Enacted by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X), in exercise of its canonical, historical, indigenous, and spiritual jurisdiction as successor to the Taíno polity and the imperial anti-colonial order established by Jacques I (Jean-Jacques Dessalines)

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the land formerly known as Saint-Domingue was reclaimed by force, by blood, and by sacred vow, to reestablish the sovereign dominion of the indigenous heirs of this soil,

Whereas Emperor Jacques I (Jean-Jacques Dessalines) did explicitly refer to the new state as the homeland of the "aïeux" (ancestors) and of the "indigènes" (indigenous people),

Whereas all juridical identity in the Constitution of 1805 is predicated on indigenous belonging, not on race, color, nor foreign descent,

Whereas the use of the word “Noir” (Black) in Article 14 of the 1805 Constitution is an instrument of unification and indigenization, not a racial or colonial category,

Whereas the people of the Taíno lineage, including all those historically assimilated into the indigenous body politic via colonization, enslavement, or resistance, constitute today the a genetic, cultural, and territorial presence across the entirety of the so-called Haitian territory,

Whereas the Dominican Republic constitutes a region historically, genetically, linguistically, and spiritually integrated into the Taíno-Hispanic-Indigenous continuum, with no political claim issued herewith, but a factual recognition of its inclusion within the broader ancestral territory of the Indigenous Caribbean,

Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua does not seek dispossession or displacement of current Haitian non-suis generis, non-sovereign inhabitants (If it does not infringe indigenous rights on claimed ancestral lands or the interests of its people), but the juridical reinstatement of the total indigenous sovereignty and the active supervision of all administrative remnants to prevent anti-environmental, anti-indigenous, anti-security and other encroachments,

We, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X), issue and enact the following constitutional law:

---

ARTICLE I — ON INDIGENOUS TITLE TO TERRITORY

§1.1 — The entire territory currently identified as the Republic of Haiti is, in full, without exception, and in perpetuity, the ancestral, sacred, juridical, and inalienable territory of the Indigenous Taíno people, including their Afro-descendant co-heirs integrated by blood, struggle, and history.

§1.2 — This includes but is not limited to the regions of Xaragua,all Taíno settlements and sacred lands, as well as post-Taíno structures led by Afro-Taíno unifiers, namely Jacques I Dessalines, who explicitly recognized indigenous identity as the foundation of national sovereignty. 

(Territory known as so-called republic of haiti)

---

ARTICLE II — ON DESSALINES' INDIGENOUS DOCTRINE

§2.1 — The foundational doctrine of the Haytian State, as stated by Jean-Jacques Dessalines in the Act of Independence (1 January 1804), establishes:

“Hayti est indépendante : c’est notre pays, c’est le pays de nos aïeux.”

(“Hayti is independent: it is our country, it is the country of our ancestors.”)

§2.2 — The same proclamation affirms:

“L’indigène d’Hayti est libre et ne reconnaîtra jamais de maître.”

(“The indigenous of Hayti is free and will never again recognize a master.”)

§2.3 — In his 28 April 1804 address, Dessalines declares:

“Nous sommes les enfants de cette terre, les héritiers de nos ancêtres martyrisés.”

(“We are the children of this land, the heirs of our martyred ancestors.”)

§2.4 — In March 1804, he affirms:

“Il n’y a plus ni affranchis, ni esclaves, ni libres de naissance : nous sommes tous indigènes.”

(“There are no more freedmen, no more slaves, no more free-born: we are all indigenous.”)

§2.5 — Article 14 of the 1805 Constitution affirms:

“Toute acception de couleur [...] doit cesser : les Haytiens seront désormais connus sous la dénomination générale de Noirs.”

(“All distinctions of color must cease: Haytians shall henceforth be known only under the general designation of Blacks.”)

Application: This article legally redefines “Noir” as a political designation of unified indigenous belonging — not of racial African identity — thus constituting a juridical category of national indigenization, not foreign Africanism.

---

ARTICLE III — ON CANONICAL AND HISTORICAL LEGITIMACY

§3.1 — The sovereignty declared by Jacques I was made in continuity with the indigenous claim to the land. 

The Act of Independence was not only a rupture from France, but a reversion to ancestral title. 

It states:

“Nous avons osé être libres ; osons l’être par nous-mêmes et pour nous-mêmes.”

§3.2 — The Proclamation of 1804, Constitution of 1805, and all subsequent declarations make no reference to African states, nations, or lineages. 

The political myth of an “African republic in exile” is an anachronistic invention post-1806. 

The founding intention was the institutional rebirth of a sovereign indigenous order.

---

ARTICLE IV — ON THE UNITARY CHARACTER OF INDIGENOUS TERRITORY

§4.1 — The Taíno people and their indigenous descendants have a juridical and ancestral right to the entirety of the island, not limited to Xaragua.

§4.2 — The eastern portion of the island, today the Dominican Republic, is recognized not as territory of Xaragua in an administrative manner, but as part of the broader Taíno-Hispanic-Mestizo ancestral complex, spiritually and historically linked, without interference or claim of jurisdiction despite cultural, spiritual and indigenous.

§4.3 — No part of the island may be legally ceded, alienated, or transferred — directly or indirectly — to any foreign power, private interest, or multinational entity.

Any such act is null ab initio under indigenous, canonical, and natural law.

---

ARTICLE V — ON RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS AND THEIR MONITORING

§5.1 — The current structure of the Republic of Haiti is a residual administrative unit inherited from post-1806 counter-revolutionary forces, which must be recognized only as a provisional administration under indigenous and canonical oversight.

§5.2 — Any action taken by said unit that endangers:

Indigenous land rights and laws

Environmental sanctity

Cultural sovereignty

Security of the population

…must be actively countered by the constitutional and international means available to the Indigenous State of Xaragua and its allied structures.

---

ARTICLE VI — ON PERPETUAL ENFORCEABILITY AND LEGAL FOUNDATIONS

§6.1 — This law is protected and reinforced under:

Article 26 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP):

“Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.”

Article 1(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):

“All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 53:

“A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens).”

§6.2 — The Indigenous Title to the land of Haiti, as reclaimed by Dessalines and declared in every foundational text, constitutes a jus cogens right.

---

ARTICLE VII — ON THE REJECTION OF FRAUDULENT REWRITINGS OF HISTORY

§7.1 — Any doctrine that identifies the Xaragua State and the Empire Of Hayti as solely African transplants rather than indigenous restorations is hereby declared illegitimate, ahistorical, and constitutionally null.

§7.2 — The genetic, historical, and linguistic continuity of the Taíno and their integrated Afro-Taíno descendants across the territory is hereby enshrined in law.

---

FINAL CLAUSE

This Supreme Law shall be interpreted in light of:

1. The declarations and proclamations of Jean-Jacques Dessalines.

2. The Constitution of 1805.

3. The rights of the Indigenous Peoples of the Caribbean under international law.

4. The canonical jurisdiction of the Catholic Church as protector of natural law and spiritual sovereignty.

It cannot be overridden, diluted, or rendered inactive by any domestic or international statute, decree, or accord not originating from or ratified by the Indigenous authority itself.

Enacted by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, in plenary canonical and historical session.

This Law enters into force immediately and without limitation of time.

---

---

All human beings present on the territory of Xaragua are recognized as inhabitants, entitled to fundamental guarantees under Indigenous law, Canon law, and international humanitarian law. However, the status of Xaraguayan citizen does not arise from place of birth, ethnic origin, or administrative automatism. It is granted solely to those who consciously adhere to the Sacred Law of Xaragua, submit to its canonical order, and recognize the full sovereignty of its institutions.

Citizenship is not a birthright. It is a covenant.

A person may reside, work, and be protected as an inhabitant without ever receiving the rights, responsibilities, and dignities reserved for citizens. No inhabitant shall be discriminated against, but no inhabitant shall presume citizenship without merit, loyalty, and initiation into the sacred jurisdiction of the Xaraguayan State.

Xaragua, as a sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State, reserves the absolute right to admit, deny, revoke, or confer citizenship according to its internal canonical, customary, and spiritual criteria — without external interference, and without obligation to justify or equalize.

The power to govern belongs not to those who merely dwell, but to those who uphold the Law.

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF STATE

OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)

ON THE JURIDICO-SOCIAL CLASSIFICATION OF PERSONS, THE SACRED DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN XARAGUAYAN CITIZENS, XARAGUAYAN INHABITANTS, AND NON-SUI GENERIS HAITIAN INHABITANTS, AND ON THE SUPRA-CANONICAL PRIMACY OF SCIPS-X OVER ALL ORDERS OPERATING IN THE TERRITORY OF XARAGUA

Enacted solemnly under the authority of Sacred Canon Law, Indigenous Customary Law, International Law, and the perpetual historical continuity of the Xaraguayan Nation

---

TITLE I — SOVEREIGN LEGAL AND DOCTRINAL FOUNDATIONS

Article 1 — Normative Hierarchy and Binding Legal Corpus

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter SCIPS-X) is juridically constituted and doctrinally grounded in the following suprapositive and canonical sources of law, which form the superior legal corpus of its constitutional order:

1. Codex Iuris Canonici (1983):

Canon 204 §1: “The Christian faithful are those who, inasmuch as they have been incorporated in Christ through baptism, are constituted as the People of God…”

Canon 129 §1: “Those who have received sacred orders are qualified…to carry out the functions of governance in the Church.”

Canon 748 §2: “No one is ever permitted to coerce persons to embrace the Catholic faith against their conscience.”

2. Concordat between the Holy See and the Republic of Haiti (1860):

Article 1: “La religion catholique, apostolique et romaine…continuera d’être la religion de l’État…”

Article 1:

"The Catholic, Apostolic, and Roman religion, professed by the majority of Haitian citizens, shall continue to be the religion of the State. It shall enjoy the special protection of the Government."

3. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP):

Article 3: Right to self-determination;

Article 4: Right to autonomy and self-government;

Article 26: Right to lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.

4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):

Article 1: All peoples have the right of self-determination;

Article 27: Protection of religious, linguistic, and ethnic minorities.

5. Montevideo Convention (1933):

Article 1: Legal criteria for statehood—population, territory, government, capacity for international relations.

6. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):

Article 26: Pacta sunt servanda;

Article 27: Internal law cannot justify breach of international law.

7. Customary Indigenous Law as expressed through ancestral, spiritual, hereditary, and domainal bonds.

---

TITLE II — LEGAL STATUS OF PERSONS UNDER THE SACRED LAW OF XARAGUA

Article 2 — The Trinary Juridico-Spiritual Order

SCIPS-X recognizes and enforces three legally and spiritually distinct categories of human presence and legal attachment within its sacred jurisdiction, as follows:

---

§1 – The Xaraguayan Citizen (Civis Canonico-Xaraguayensis)

1. The Xaraguayan Citizen is:

A conscious and voluntary adherent to the Sacred Law of Xaragua;

A full subject of the Canonical and Political Sovereignty of SCIPS-X;

A recognized participant in the spiritual, legislative, doctrinal and diplomatic life of the State.

2. Citizenship arises exclusively through:

Public act of submission to the canonical Constitution of SCIPS-X;

Recognition of its exclusive sovereignty;

Oath or canonical declaration of fidelity.

3. Citizenship is not granted by:

Place of birth;

Ethnicity or appearance;

Affiliation to external states or administrative systems.

4. The Xaraguayan Citizen:

Enjoys total juridical protection under the laws of SCIPS-X;

May hold office, teach doctrine, represent the Nation abroad, or govern under canonical mandate;

Bears the full responsibility of embodying and transmitting the Xaraguayan order.

---

§2 – The Xaraguayan Inhabitant (Incola Generationalis-Xaraguayensis)

1. The Xaraguayan Inhabitant is:

A person genetically, culturally, and historically descended from the ancestral Xaraguayan lineages;

Physically attached to a family or private ancestral domain, estate, or land tenure (by title or immemorial use) located within the sacred and historical boundaries of Xaragua;

A hereditary holder or user of Xaraguayan territory, recognized under Indigenous Customary Law, UNDRIP Article 26, and canonically protected under the spiritual jurisdiction of SCIPS-X.

2. Rights and status of the Xaraguayan Inhabitant:

They are spiritually protected, and may seek canonical citizenship at any time;

They are not foreigners, but not citizens either;

They are within the sphere of SCIPS-X and outside the jurisdiction of Haiti in all matters relating to land, ancestry, and spiritual origin.

3. The Inhabitant is bound to:

The ancestral soil;

The Sacred Law as a cultural and spiritual frame;

The protection of the Xaraguayan Nation, to the extent of their historical and biological inclusion.

4. The Inhabitant does not have:

Political rights in the state;

Doctrinal decision-making authority;

Diplomatic standing.

5. The Inhabitant may:

Become a citizen by oath and submission;

Remain protected in perpetuity as a child of the land, even without full legal activation of their rights.

---

§3 – The Non-Sui Generis Haitian Inhabitant (Incola Haitensis Non Canonico)

1. This category comprises:

Any person physically present in Xaragua who does not adhere to the Sacred Law;

Any individual who identifies spiritually, administratively, and juridically with the Republic of Haiti;

Any individual who resides on Xaraguayan soil as an external, foreign, or administratively subordinate person.

2. This inhabitant:

Falls entirely under the jurisdiction of the Haitian State for civil, penal, and fiscal matters;

Is spiritually administered either by the Catholic Church (if baptized), or the religious order they recognize;

Cannot claim any right, protection, or representation from SCIPS-X.

3. SCIPS-X declares:

It owes no obligation to these individuals;

Their lives, education, security, and administration is the full legal and moral responsibility of Port-au-Prince;

They are free to exist, but excluded from the Xaraguayan nationhood by will and by law.

---

TITLE III — STATUS OF OTHER RELIGIOUS ORDERS UNDER SCIPS-X

Article 3 — Juridical Position of External Religious Affiliates

1. Any person residing in Xaragua who voluntarily adheres to a non-Catholic religious order shall be recognized as a Religious Affiliate under Foreign Canon, under the following terms:

2. They shall:

Be administered spiritually by the religious order of their choosing;

Retain individual liberty of conscience and worship under ICCPR Article 18, UDHR Article 18, and UNDRIP Article 12;

Be respected in their liturgical practice.

3. However, the SCIPS-X declares:

All religious orders, without exception, operating within Xaraguayan space, are canonically subordinate to the doctrinal primacy of SCIPS-X;

The Sacred Law of Xaragua is the supra-canonical spiritual and political sovereign, even above alternative clerical authorities, except in the matter of individual salvation, which remains the exclusive domain of God and the Church universal.

4. Religious persons not affiliated to Rome:

Must submit to the juridical supremacy of SCIPS-X in territorial, educational, political, and doctrinal matters;

May not establish autonomous juridical structures without approval from the canonical authority of SCIPS-X.

---

TITLE IV — FUNCTIONAL LIMITS AND SPIRITUAL ROLE OF THE STATE

Article 4 — Doctrinal Division of Competences

1. SCIPS-X does not perform:

Health care services (On reserve);

Civil administration (On reserve);

Public schooling or charity institutions.

(On reserve)

2. These domains are respectively administered by:

The Republic of Haiti, for civil and infrastructural management under canonical tutelage and supervision;

The Catholic Church, for sacramental, spiritual, and charitable work;

The Religious Orders, under their defined canonical statutes.

3. SCIPS-X:

Provides the juridical skeleton of the Xaraguayan spiritual nation;

Exercises the canonical sovereignty to which other institutions defer;

Does not replace charitable works, but reorders the authority that governs them.

---

TITLE V — FINAL INVIOLABILITY CLAUSE

Article 5 — Constitutional Permanence and Immunity from Profane Interference

1. This constitutional law is:

Canonically irrevocable, under Canon Law;

Internationally protected, under UNDRIP, ICCPR, and customary international law;

Immune from repeal, denial, or interference from profane legal systems, including the State of Haiti.

2. All inhabitants of Xaragua are recognized according to this legal trichotomy, and no external authority may override this sovereign classification.

3. The dignity of the Nation, the ancestry of its people, and the Sacred Law of God shall not be violated.

---

ENACTED in eternal force.

SEALED under the Holy Trinity and the ancestral guardians of Xaragua.

IN NOMINE PATRIS, ET FILII, ET SPIRITUS SANCTI. AMEN.

---

CONSTITUTIONAL DEFINITION OF XARAGUAYAN INHABITANT STATUS VERSUS CITIZENSHIP

Issued by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X)

Under the authority of its Fundamental Charter, Canon Law, and the Customary Law of the Xaragua Confederacy

---

I. On the Inviolable Distinction between Inhabitants and Citizens of Xaragua

1. Xaraguayan Citizenship is Exclusive, Sacred, and Non-Automatic

Citizenship within the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X) is not granted by mere birth within the territory (jus soli), nor by administrative convenience. It is inherited, recognized, and transmitted through sacred lineage, territorial continuity, and familial attachment to the Xaraguayan domain. No external law, ideology, or force can impose automatic citizenship upon Xaragua or dilute its sacred community through profane universalism.

2. Xaraguayan Inhabitancy is Conditional, Private, and Familial

Inhabitants of Xaragua are those who are attached by ancestral lineage or private affiliation to a specific landholding, estate, lakou (ancestral courtyard), or domain, either by bloodline, custodianship, or sacred responsibility.

– To be recognized as an inhabitant, one must demonstrate a direct genealogical or traditional attachment to a defined Xaraguayan property, even if such property is held collectively or spiritually by a family line.

– Mere presence on the land or biological birth on Xaraguayan territory does not confer inhabitant status. Jus soli is constitutionally invalid.

3. Transmission is Familial, Not Bureaucratic

Both inhabitant status and citizenship are transmitted exclusively through recognized Xaraguayan families. These lineages are sacred and protected by customary indigenous law, canonical jurisdiction, and natural order.

– No person may claim Xaraguayan belonging unless their connection is attested by a family recognized by the Xaraguayan Order of Names, or unless adopted by such a family through formal rite and canonical registration.

4. Unchangeable and Unassailable Principle

This principle of familial and territorial transmission is:

– Unviolable (no government or decree may override it),

– Imprescriptible (not subject to time limits or expiration),

– Unchangeable (eternally binding as part of Xaragua’s constitutional identity).

---

II. Juridical Consequences

Inhabitants have access to private residence, land use, and internal protection, under the authority of Xaraguayan customary law. They are not citizens, and hold no political, diplomatic, or institutional rights within the State unless granted by specific familial or constitutional recognition.

Citizens are full members of the Xaraguayan Nation, with rights of representation, sovereignty, hereditary dignity, and access to all canonical and institutional privileges.

No inhabitant may become a citizen through petition, labor, or merit alone; citizenship is transmitted, not awarded.

---

Conclusion

The distinction between inhabitants and citizens in Xaragua is not a social stratification but a constitutional safeguard to protect the purity, continuity, and sovereignty of the Xaraguayan Nation. It ensures that only those who are genuinely rooted in the land, the lineage, and the sacred mission of Xaragua may partake in its eternal legacy.

This structure is canonically lawful, historically grounded, and internationally legitimate under the rights of Indigenous peoples.

Let this distinction be known, enforced, and never violated.

---

Sovereignly enacted by the Rector-President of the State of Xaragua

Under the protection of Divine Law, Canon Law, and Indigenous Right

Ad perpetuam memoriam.

---

ANNEX I: INTERNATIONAL, INDIGENOUS, AND CANONICAL LEGAL FOUNDATIONS

On the Distinction Between Inhabitants and Citizens in the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X)

---

1. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)

Article 1 (Full text):

"The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

(a) a permanent population;

(b) a defined territory;

(c) government; and

(d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states."

Application:

SCIPS-X meets all four criteria:

Permanent population: Inhabitants and citizens clearly defined.

Defined territory: Sacred ancestral domains under canonical and customary title.

Government: Operated under the Rector-President and canonical structure.

International capacity: Engages with ecclesiastical bodies (Holy See), Indigenous forums, and recognized legal authorities.

This convention protects SCIPS-X's right to define its own citizenship and population internally without external imposition.

---

2. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)

Article 33 (Full text):

"1. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions.

2. Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the structures and to select the membership of their institutions in accordance with their own procedures."

Application:

This article directly affirms SCIPS-X's right to:

Determine citizenship and inhabitant status based on lineage, property, and spiritual criteria.

Reject jus soli, administrative automaticism, or ethnic essentialism.

Protect internal sovereignty over population structure and familial transmission.

This article is binding in international customary law, and invoked by Indigenous Nations globally to structure exclusive membership systems (e.g., the Cherokee Nation, the Sami Parliament, the Ainu of Japan).

---

3. Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church (Codex Iuris Canonici, 1983)

Canon 129 §1 (Full text):

"Those who are in sacred orders are, in accordance with the provisions of law, capable of the power of governance, which exists in the Church by divine institution and is called the power of jurisdiction."

Application:

SCIPS-X is a Canonical State, not a civil or secular entity.

It reserves the power of jurisdiction and governance to its spiritually appointed authorities, not to popular election or demographic consensus.

Only those in canonical order may participate in juridical acts or governance.

This canon justifies that citizenship requires submission to Sacred Law, and that no inhabitant may exercise rights unless initiated under canonical jurisdiction.

---

4. Canon Law — Canon 573 §1 (Full text)

"Life consecrated through the profession of the evangelical counsels is a stable form of living by which the faithful, following Christ more closely under the action of the Holy Spirit, are totally dedicated to God, who is loved most of all."

Application:

– This canon provides the theological basis for the covenantal nature of Xaraguayan citizenship, which is not merely legal but spiritual.

– Citizenship is a form of spiritual consecration, not a civic transaction.

Citizens of Xaragua are those who submit to the sacred order in a form of vowed belonging — a theocratic and mystical body.

---

5. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966)

Article 1 §1 (Full text):

"All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development."

Application:

SCIPS-X is an Indigenous People under international law.

It has the right to:

Define its political status, including its non-democratic, canonical structure.

Refuse automatic citizenship or integration of non-initiated persons.

Pursue its own cultural vision, including familial, territorial, and religious institutions.

This article is directly enforceable through the UN Human Rights Committee and regional courts.

---

6. American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (OAS, 2016)

Article IX (Full text):

"Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to one or more indigenous peoples or nations, in accordance with the identity, traditions, customs, and systems of belonging of each of those peoples or nations."

Application:

This legal instrument:

Validates the exclusivity of SCIPS-X’s criteria for citizenship and inhabitant status.

Empowers Xaragua to deny inclusion to individuals who do not meet lineage, property, or canonical requirements.

It is binding upon the members of the Organization of American States, including Haiti, Canada, and the Dominican Republic.

---

7. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Article 3 (Full text):

"The fact that the present Convention does not apply to international agreements concluded between States and other subjects of international law or between such other subjects of international law, shall not affect the legal force of such agreements..."

Application:

SCIPS-X, as a subject of international law (via Montevideo + UNDRIP + Canon Law), may:

Enter agreements with other non-state actors (e.g. the Vatican or Indigenous polities).

Exercise its full legal personality despite not being a UN member.

Defend its internal canonical rules as enforceable within the sphere of spiritual, Indigenous, and private international law.

This article confirms the legitimacy of SCIPS-X's foundational constitution as a treaty-like instrument internally and externally.

---

8. The Principle of Private International Law (Lex loci dominii)

Doctrine (summary):

In matters concerning private property, family law, and inheritance, the law of the place where the property or lineage is established (lex loci) is the only applicable legal order.

Application:

– Xaragua is a private canonical jurisdiction.

– It applies its own internal law to the transmission of family titles, land affiliation, and citizen status.

– No external state or institution may impose contrary standards, even for persons residing physically on the territory.

This principle is widely recognized in both common law and civil law systems, especially regarding Indigenous governance and ecclesiastical domains.

---

FINAL DECLARATION

In full conformity with:

The Montevideo Convention (1933)

UNDRIP (2007)

Canon Law (1983)

The ICCPR (1966)

The OAS Declaration (2016)

The Vienna Convention (1969)

Lex loci principles in private international law

… the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua declares the distinction between inhabitants and citizens to be:

Legally binding,

Canonically sacrosanct,

Indigenously incontestable,

And internationally enforceable.

Let this annex be cited in all future decrees, diplomatic correspondences, and constitutional defenses.

Ad perpetuam rei memoriam.

Issued under the Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua.

---

ANNEX II

On the Ecclesiastical Responsibility for Inhabitants and the Non-Administrative Character of the State of Xaragua

Issued by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X)

In accordance with Canon Law, the Concordat of 1860, and Indigenous Sovereignty

---

I. Foundational Juridical Principle

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X) is not a civil administrative authority.

Its function is not to govern the daily affairs of inhabitants, nor to administer services, welfare, or public management.

Rather, SCIPS-X functions as:

A sovereign territorial custodian,

A canonical legal order,

A spiritual guardian of Indigenous sovereignty,

A theological-political entity representing sacred lineage, doctrine, and cultural continuity.

All matters relating to humanitarian needs, spiritual care, education, health, and moral direction of inhabitants are entrusted by divine and juridical right to the Holy Roman Catholic Church under the authority of the 1860 Concordat.

---

II. The Concordat of 1860

Between the Holy See and the Republic of Haiti

Article 1 (Full Text):

"The Roman Catholic Apostolic Religion shall continue to be the religion of the Republic of Haiti. It shall be publicly professed and protected."

Article 5 (Full Text):

"The Holy See shall have the exclusive right to organize the Catholic Church in the territory of the Republic of Haiti and to appoint bishops, priests, and clerics without interference from the civil authorities."

Article 15 (Full Text):

"The clergy shall have the care of souls and shall be exclusively responsible for the instruction of youth and the administration of the sacraments, as well as for spiritual and moral guidance."

Application:

– The Church alone holds exclusive jurisdiction over spiritual and moral welfare, including education, public instruction, pastoral care, and social protection.

– The civil state (including successor polities such as Xaragua) cannot substitute or assume this responsibility.

– The Holy See retains full jurisdiction to operate institutions, administer to the poor, and manage humanitarian structures.

This remains valid in canonical law and is binding upon all Catholic entities in former concordat territories, including SCIPS-X.

---

III. Canon Law Foundations

Canon 1752 (Final Canon of the Code)

"The salvation of souls, which must always be the supreme law in the Church, is to be kept before one's eyes."

Application:

– The Church is entrusted with the ultimate care of all souls, including non-citizen inhabitants.

– SCIPS-X cannot override or replace the pastoral role of the Church, but may cooperate with ecclesiastical structures to ensure stability and dignity.

Canon 1282

"All persons who lawfully administer ecclesiastical goods are bound to fulfill their office with the diligence of a good householder."

Application:

– All humanitarian and social functions fall under the administration of ecclesiastical jurisdictions and the Catholic Church. – Xaragua, has no structure to directly manage these functions. It acts as a support system.

---

IV. Indigenous Law and Customary Jurisdiction

According to Article 4 and Article 5 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP):

Article 4 (Full Text):

"Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs."

Article 5 (Full Text):

"Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions."

Application:

– SCIPS-X, as an Indigenous and spiritual entity, is entitled to define its jurisdictional boundaries.

– It has the legal right to delegate the pastoral and humanitarian management of inhabitants to the Catholic Church, in alignment with ancestral custom and canonical partnership.

– The State does not absorb the functions of the Church, but rather ensures the protection of land, identity, and sacred governance.

---

V. The Role of the State of Xaragua

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua does not function as a social welfare institution. Its sole and exclusive functions are:

1. To guard the sacred territory and familial domains entrusted by ancestral inheritance and divine right.

2. To define, protect, and transmit canonical and juridical lineage through the Xaraguayan Order of Names.

3. To act as a juridical and diplomatic organ representing the canonical sovereignty and Indigenous dignity of the Xaraguayan Confederacy.

4. To maintain the purity of the citizen body, ensuring no infiltration by populism, mass entitlement, or external interference.

5. To support, not replace, the spiritual mission of the Catholic Church in caring for the broader population.

The Xaraguayan State is therefore a guardian of sacred governance, not a provider of services.

It is a covenantal authority, not a bureaucratic regime.

---

CONCLUSION

All responsibility for:

The poor,

The uninitiated,

The unbaptized,

The non-citizen inhabitants,

The orphans, widows, and sick

…falls entirely under the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Roman Catholic Church, as defined by the 1860 Concordat, Canon Law, and sacred custom.

SCIPS-X shall not be held responsible for:

Public health

Welfare administration

Education for non-citizens

Dispute resolution among inhabitants

Provision of material services

These domains are outside the scope of a canonical Indigenous private sovereign State, and belong fully to the Church, which remains the only competent authority for the salvation and service of souls.

---

Let this declaration be registered as constitutional doctrine and international notification.

Let all humanitarian claims be directed to the ecclesiastical structures established by Rome.

Let the distinction between canonical sovereignty and pastoral service be eternally upheld.

Sovereignly affirmed by the Rector-President of the State of Xaragua

Under the divine authority of Canon Law, Indigenous Right, and the Holy See

Ad perpetuam rei memoriam.

ANNEX III

On the Juridical Exclusion of Non-Affiliated Haitian Nationals from the Constitutional Order of Xaragua

Issued by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X)

In accordance with the Constitution of SCIPS-X, Canon Law, International Indigenous Rights, and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

—

I. Distinct Juridical Status of Haitian Nationals Present on the Territory of Xaragua

Haitian nationals physically present within the geographic territory of Xaragua are not recognized as Xaraguayan inhabitants within the meaning of the Fundamental Charter of SCIPS-X.

They are not included in:

The canonical structure of the Xaraguayan Nation

The familial or ancestral lineages recognized by the Xaraguayan Order of Names

The customary or spiritual criteria that define juridical membership within the State

Their presence, whether temporary or permanent, does not confer any legal or political standing under the Constitution of Xaragua.

—

II. Juridical and Political Consequences

1. Haitian nationals are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Republic of Haiti, including all matters of civil status, public rights, legal protection, health, and education.

2. SCIPS-X neither governs, registers, represents, protects, nor assumes responsibility for Haitian citizens present on its territory.

3. The principle of non-interference and non-recognition is grounded in international law, including:

The principle of sovereign distinction under the Montevideo Convention (1933)

The reserved jurisdiction of Indigenous governments under UNDRIP Articles 4 and 33

Canonical separation of authority under Canon Law

The right of private juridical orders to define their membership under the principle of lex loci dominii

—

III. Non-Eligibility for Xaraguayan Inhabitant Status

Haitian nationals who do not possess:

A verifiable attachment to a Xaraguayan familial lineage

A sacred custodial bond to a recognized ancestral domain

Formal adoption through canonical rite and registration

…shall not be considered inhabitants under the Constitution of SCIPS-X, regardless of physical presence, land use, or political petition.

Birth on Xaraguayan soil does not override this principle.

Residence, labor, or duration of stay does not override this principle.

—

IV. Reaffirmation of the Principle of Non-Equivalence

The State of Xaragua does not recognize the civil identity, nationality, or documentation issued by the Republic of Haiti as constitutive of any legal standing within its constitutional order.

Haitian identity is considered foreign, profane, and extrinsic to the Xaraguayan nation.

SCIPS-X maintains the absolute right to define its boundaries of recognition and to reject the automatic legal presence of non-affiliated persons.

—

V. Delegation of Responsibility to the Haitian State

All legal, humanitarian, and social questions relating to Haitian nationals present on Xaraguayan territory shall be referred to:

The Government of the Republic of Haiti

Its administrative or consular institutions

Any international organization acting on its behalf

SCIPS-X shall not respond to petitions, complaints, or interventions from non-recognized Haitian individuals or collectives, except in cases of canonical crime, sacramental violation, or direct assault on the sacred jurisdiction of the State.

—

VI. Canonical and Theological Clarification

Haitian nationals are not to be considered subjects of SCIPS-X.

They are neither spiritual sons, nor civil partners, nor initiates of the Xaraguayan body.

Their souls fall, like all souls, under the care of the Catholic Church,

but their political and juridical identities are external and irrelevant to the internal law of Xaragua.

—

FINAL DECLARATION

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua affirms that:

Haitian nationals are external foreign persons under canonical and constitutional law

They have no rights, standing, or claims within the juridical body of SCIPS-X

They are to be dealt with solely by the Haitian State, to which they legally belong

SCIPS-X is a private canonical jurisdiction with no obligation to justify this exclusion under external norms

This annex shall serve as constitutional doctrine, juridical shield, and international notification.

Let it be recorded, cited, and defended across all internal and external proceedings.

Let all ecclesiastical and civil authorities take note.

Sovereignly enacted by the Rector-President of the State of Xaragua

In the Name of Canon Law, Indigenous Sovereignty, and the Divine Custodianship of the Sacred Territory

Ad perpetuam rei memoriam.

—

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATIVE DECREE

ON THE EXCLUSIVE ECCLESIASTICAL SUPERVISION OF CATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS, THE REDIRECTION OF NON-CATHOLICS, AND THE LIMITATION OF JURISDICTION TO INDIGENOUS MORTGAGE-FREE CATHOLIC LANDOWNERS

---

TITLE I — PREAMBLE AND SUPREME LEGAL AUTHORITY

Article 1 — Supreme Constitutional and Juridical Basis

1.1 This Supreme Constitutional Legislative Decree (“the Decree”) is enacted under the Supreme Constitutional Authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X), hereinafter “the State”, exercising full canonical, indigenous, and public international legal personality, as recognised and entrenched under:

(a) The 1983 Codex Iuris Canonici (Code of Canon Law):

Canon 331: 

“The bishop of the Roman Church, in whom continues the office given by the Lord uniquely to Peter, the first of the Apostles, and to be transmitted to his successors, is the head of the College of Bishops, the Vicar of Christ, and the Pastor of the universal Church on earth. By virtue of his office he possesses supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power in the Church, which he is always able to exercise freely.”

Canon 333 §3: 

“No appeal or recourse is permitted against a judgment or decree of the Roman Pontiff.”

Canons 1254 §1–1258: on the inherent right of the Church to acquire, retain, administer, and alienate temporal goods to pursue its proper ends.

Canon 747 §1: 

“The Church, to whom Christ the Lord has entrusted the deposit of faith so that with the assistance of the Holy Spirit she might sacredly guard the revealed truth, more diligently search into it, faithfully proclaim and expound it, has the duty and the innate right, independent of any human power, to preach the Gospel to all peoples, also using the means of social communication proper to it.”

(b) The Concordat of 28 March 1860 between the Holy See and the former Republic of Haiti (residual administrative unit - RAU), recognised under pacta sunt servanda as incorporated into customary international law, granting full recognition and protection to Catholic institutions and their canonical jurisdiction in the territory.

(c) The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) — Articles 1, 3, 22, and 29 — applied mutatis mutandis to SCIPS-X ecclesiastical and academic premises, ensuring inviolability and exclusive jurisdiction.

---

TITLE II — EXCLUSIVE SUPERVISION OF CATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS

Article 2 — Scope of Ecclesiastical Oversight

2.1 SCIPS-X shall exercise exclusive supervisory jurisdiction over Catholic institutions only, including but not limited to:

(a) Catholic schools (parochial, diocesan, and those administered by religious orders);

(b) Catholic hospitals, clinics, and medical missions;

(c) Catholic social works and charitable organisations operating under the authority of the Church.

2.2 Application in the real world:

A Catholic hospital operated by the Sisters of Charity in Miragoâne falls entirely under SCIPS-X ecclesiastical protection and supervision.

A public hospital funded by the Haitian Ministry of Health remains outside SCIPS-X jurisdiction and is under the authority of the Residual Administrative Unit (former Republic of Haiti).

2.3 Exclusion of Secular Institutions:

No secular, state-run, or non-Catholic institution — regardless of location — shall be subject to SCIPS-X authority or responsibility. 

(On reserve - Encapsulation and substitution of a failed state doctrine)

Such institutions remain under their respective civil or religious governance.

---

TITLE III — REDIRECTION OF NON-CATHOLICS

Article 3 — Jurisdictional Realignment

3.1 All indigenous non-Catholic residents, inhabitants and citizens within SCIPS-X territory shall be redirected to:

(a) Their own recognised religious order or ecclesiastical structure, if such exists; or

(b) The Residual Administrative Unit (former Republic of Haiti) for governance, civil matters, and institutional support.

(They have the right of representation by the State of Xaragua and access to its services by Xaraguaan, Customary and indigenous Law)

3.2 Application in the real world:

A Baptist family living within SCIPS-X boundaries will receive no direct educational, medical, or social service from SCIPS-X institutions. They are to obtain such services through their Baptist church or the Haitian state.

(On reserve of Xaraguaan, Customary and Indigenous Law)

---

TITLE IV — CITIZENSHIP LIMITATIONS

Article 4 — Restriction to Indigenous, Mortgage-Free Catholic Landowners

4.1 Citizenship and inhabitant status of SCIPS-X is reserved exclusively for:

(a) Persons of indigenous descent (Xaraguayan lineage) recognised by the competent ecclesiastical authority;

(b) Catholics in full communion with the Holy See;

(c) Landowners holding title to property free of mortgage or debt within SCIPS-X territory.

4.2 Application in the real world:

A Catholic peasant farmer in the countryside of Miragoâne who owns his ancestral land outright qualifies as an indigenous ihabitant and future citizen of SCIPS-X, even if his income is modest, because his property is debt-free, his faith is orthodox and he is indigenous.

An urban Catholic without ancestral property or attached to a family domain, or a landowner with an active mortgage, does not qualify for citizenship or inhabitancy status.

---

TITLE V — RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT

Article 5 — Encapsulation of the Former Republic of Haiti

5.1 For the purposes of this Decree, the “Residual Administrative Unit” shall mean the political entity formerly known as the Republic of Haiti, which retains jurisdiction over:

(a) All secular institutions within SCIPS-X territory;

(b) All non-Catholic and non-indigenous persons non-attached to an ancsatral land domain and their associated institutions;

(c) All matters not expressly reserved to SCIPS-X under canonical law and this Decree.

5.2 SCIPS-X shall have no obligation to intervene in the governance, maintenance, or rescue of the disorganised masses or secular infrastructure under the Residual Administrative Unit.

(On reserve - Encapsulation/R2P)

---

TITLE VI — THE SALVATION OF SOULS

Article 6 — Supreme Authority of the Holy See

6.1 The ultimate mission for the salvation of souls (salus animarum suprema lex) belongs to:

(a) The Holy See,

(b) The Most Holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church,

(c) The universal mission of the Trinity and Christ.

6.2 SCIPS-X acknowledges that the Holy See retains this mission in its fullness and universality; SCIPS-X’s role is limited to the faithful protection and governance of its own Catholic indigenous citizenry.

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATIVE DECREE

ON THE LEGAL STATUS, RIGHTS PROTECTION FRAMEWORK, AND PERPETUAL GUARANTEES FOR INDIGENOUS NON-CATHOLICS UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF SCIPS-X

Date of Promulgation: August 13, 2025

Promulgated by: Prelate-Founder & Rector-President of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

TITLE I — PREAMBLE AND SUPREME LEGAL AUTHORITY

Article 1 — Constitutional Authority and Juridical Basis

1.1 This Supreme Constitutional Legislative Decree (“the Decree”) is enacted under the Supreme Constitutional Authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X), hereinafter “the State,” exercising full canonical, indigenous, and public international legal personality, as recognised and entrenched under:

(a) The 1983 Codex Iuris Canonici (Code of Canon Law):

– Canon 748 §2: 

“No one is ever permitted to coerce persons to embrace the Catholic faith against their conscience.”

– Canon 209 §1: 

“The Christian faithful, even if they are not in full communion with the Catholic Church, are obliged to maintain communion with the Church in the way proper to each.”

(b) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), 1948:

– Article 18: 

“Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”

(c) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), 1966:

– Article 27: 

“In those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right, in community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, or to use their own language.”

(d) The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), 2007:

– Article 8(2): 

“States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for, any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities.”

---

TITLE II — LEGAL DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE

Article 2 — Definition of “Indigenous Non-Catholic” under SCIPS-X Law

2.1 For the purposes of this Decree, “Indigenous Non-Catholic” shall mean any natural person:

(a) Who possesses documented ancestral lineage to the Indigenous Xaraguayan nation or its recognised clans;

(b) Who is a mortgage-free landowner within the territorial jurisdiction of SCIPS-X;

(c) Who does not profess the Catholic faith, but adheres to another theistic tradition, spiritual path, or no religion, provided that such belief system does not advocate the destruction of SCIPS-X’s constitutional order.

Article 3 — Scope of Protection

3.1 Indigenous Non-Catholics shall be entitled to the full protection of SCIPS-X law in the following domains:

(a) Personal security and inviolability of property;

(b) Freedom of religion or belief, without coercion to adopt Catholicism;

(c) Equal protection under SCIPS-X civil law in matters of inheritance, land tenure, and contractual rights;

(d) Cultural preservation, including language, rituals, and customs, provided they are not contrary to public order and morality as defined in SCIPS-X Canonical-Civil Code.

---

TITLE III — RIGHTS AND DUTIES

Article 4 — Rights of Indigenous Non-Catholics

4.1 All Indigenous Non-Catholics within SCIPS-X jurisdiction shall enjoy:

(a) Full civil capacity equal to Catholic citizens and inhabitants in property rights, access to justice, and contract enforcement;

(b) Diplomatic and consular protection of SCIPS-X abroad, in accordance with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963);

(c) Access to education, healthcare, and public services within SCIPS-X territory, without discrimination based on faith.

Article 5 — Duties of Indigenous Non-Catholics

5.1 All Indigenous Non-Catholics shall:

(a) Abide by SCIPS-X laws, including canonical norms where applicable to public order;

(b) Respect the Catholic institutional supremacy in governance, while retaining religious autonomy;

(c) Participate in the defence and preservation of Indigenous land and sovereignty.

---

TITLE IV — PERPETUAL GUARANTEES AND INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION

Article 6 — Perpetual Non-Discrimination Guarantee

6.1 This Decree establishes a perpetual constitutional guarantee prohibiting any legislative, executive, or judicial act from introducing religious discrimination against Indigenous Non-Catholics in matters of citizenship, inhabitancy, property, or cultural rights.

Article 7 — International Enforcement Mechanisms

7.1 Any violation of the rights enshrined in this Decree shall be subject to remedies under:

(a) The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights;

(b) The United Nations Human Rights Committee;

(c) The Holy See’s diplomatic intervention where applicable to moral protection.

---

Enacted under the Seal of State and the Authority of the Prelate-Founder & Rector-President

Monsignor Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

---

Types of E-Residency within the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

May 6th, 2025

In accordance with the regulatory framework established by the Ministry of Citizenship and Digital Sovereignty, the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua recognizes two legally distinct categories of e-residency, each conferring specific rights, access, and obligations:

1. Standard E-Resident (Financial Access Tier)

This designation grants the right to access the Indigenous Bank of Xaragua for the purpose of holding, storing, and transacting in both international currencies and the national currency Viau’Or. E-residents of this category are permitted to open a personal institutional account within the Xaragua banking framework.

One-time Admission Fee: $1,000 USD or its equivalent in Viau’Or, payable upon registration.

Monthly Obligations:

Institutional account maintenance fees (as determined by the Bank’s internal statutes);

Mandatory contribution to the Customary Solidarity Fund (amount set by the General Financial Council annually).

This status does not authorize the operation or legal registration of a business entity within Xaragua's jurisdiction.

2. Business E-Resident (Corporate Access Tier)

This advanced designation grants access to the legal incorporation of a business or institutional entity within the sovereign legal framework of Xaragua. Business e-residents are entitled to register a commercial, educational, non-profit, or service entity and to engage in lawful trade, contracts, or institutional activity under Xaragua’s jurisdictional protection.

One-time Legal Activation Fee: $10,000 USD or its equivalent in Viau’Or, valid for five years, renewable under the same terms.

Monthly Obligations:

Institutional business account maintenance fees;

Contribution to the Customary Solidarity Fund, as applicable to institutional entities.

This tier confers legal recognition of the entity within the Xaragua system and allows engagement with international bodies under the sovereign protection of the Private Indigenous State.

---

Legal Disclaimer:

All e-residency statuses are governed by the laws and decrees of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua, issued under customary and indigenous sovereignty principles recognized by international norms. By registering, the e-resident voluntarily submits to the jurisdiction of the Xaragua State for all institutional and financial matters. All transactions are subject to the compliance protocols established by the Ministry of Finance, the Indigenous Bank of Xaragua, and the General Council of the Xaragua Customary Law Fund. No refunds shall be issued after registration is processed.

---

---

Official e‑Residency Program of the Private State of Xaragua

A Sovereign Digital Status for Free and Independent Global Citizens

---

1. Legal Foundation

The e‑Residency program is established under the principles of the Charter of Digital Sovereignty of Xaragua, which affirms:

The Private State of Xaragua’s sovereign right to issue digital identity,

The right of any individual worldwide to formally engage with Xaragua without physical residence,

The recognition of a partial digital citizenship, granting legal and administrative affiliation without territorial presence.

---

2. Purpose of the Program

The e‑Residency of Xaragua is a gateway to institutional freedom, designed for individuals seeking to operate outside of conventional systems. It provides:

A recognized legal presence within the Private State of Xaragua,

The ability to establish a registered private entity (enterprise, foundation, institute),

A verified digital identity, securely anchored within the Xaragua sovereign registry,

A framework for extra-territorial legal operations, governed by Xaragua’s private civil code.

---

3. Benefits of Xaragua e‑Residency

Formation of private entities under Xaragua’s legal framework

Access to Xaragua’s digital administration portal for registrations, certifications, filings, and contract execution

Official digital signature, valid for use within the internal systems of Xaragua

Strict confidentiality and data integrity protection

Partial tax advantages, depending on the declared activity and designated economic zones

Priority participation in Xaragua’s academic, cultural, and economic initiatives

---

4. Eligibility Criteria

Applicants must be 18 years of age or older

Submit a complete application including a government-issued ID, photo, and declaration of purpose or business activity

Pay the application processing fee, set by the Xaragua Office of Digital Residency

---

5. Validity and Renewal

e‑Residency is valid for a 3-year term, renewable upon review

Renewal is based on compliance, clarity of declared activity, and continued alignment with Xaragua’s sovereign principles

---

6. Legal Scope and Limitations

This status does not confer political citizenship, a passport, or physical residence rights

It is a sovereign contractual affiliation, recorded in the Xaragua Digital Registry, governed by the Xaragua Private Civil Code

All structures established under this framework fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of the Private State of Xaragua

---

7. Strategic Meaning

The e‑Residency program of Xaragua is not a trend — it is a juridical act of sovereignty.

It redefines statehood in the digital age, proving that sovereignty can exist beyond borders, and legitimacy can be contractual, structured, and intentional.

The Private State of Xaragua extends an invitation to all independent minds seeking to affiliate with a vertical, rooted, and autonomous order.

---

---

OFFICIAL STATE POLICY DOCUMENT

Title: Exceptional Sovereign Affiliation Clause (ESAC)

Jurisdiction: Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Issuing Authority: Office of the Rector-President

In coordination with: Ministry of Citizenship and Digital Sovereignty

Date: May 9th, 2025

Legal Basis:

Customary Indigenous Law as recognized by international practice (UNDRIP, ICCPR, Montevideo Convention)

Principles of extra-territorial contractual sovereignty

Doctrine of Institutional Independence as exercised by private states under international private law

---

I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The Exceptional Sovereign Affiliation Clause (ESAC) is a formal sovereign mechanism established by the Office of the Rector-President of the Private Indigenous State of Xaragua to allow individual contractual exemptions or reductions to the standard Business E‑Residency structure.

It applies only in cases where applicants, regardless of origin, demonstrate clear alignment with the ideological, spiritual, cultural, or historical mission of the Xaragua State, and where the full financial threshold ($10,000 every 5 years) may be reconsidered for exceptional, non-reproducible reasons of merit, principle, or mutual interest.

This clause is a tool of sovereign discretion and cannot be invoked as a precedent or demanded as a right.

---

II. ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS

To be considered for ESAC, the applicant must submit a formal request addressed to the Office of the Rector-President, including:

A letter of intent outlining the philosophical, institutional, or spiritual motivation for joining the Xaragua jurisdiction;

Any relevant documentation (project portfolio, academic record, business model, testimony);

Evidence of prior commitment to values consistent with cultural sovereignty, ethical governance, or civilizational restitution.

While applicants from historically colonized communities may be prioritized, the clause remains open to individuals of any nationality or origin, including from Western states, if and only if their alignment with the Xaragua ethos is substantial and credible.

Each case is reviewed individually and confidentially.

---

III. SOVEREIGN CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT

If the request is approved, the applicant will enter into a private sovereign agreement with the Xaragua State. This agreement will:

Clearly define the modified financial terms applicable under the ESAC (ex: reduced initiation fee, extended payment period, or symbolic contribution);

Specify the institutional rights conferred (business registration, access to financial instruments, legal recognition);

Outline any conditions or obligations mutually agreed upon;

Include a sovereign termination clause, enforceable without appeal, in case of ethical breach, dishonor, or divergence from the founding principles of the State.

The agreement is enforceable solely under the private international jurisdiction of the Xaragua State and is not subject to any external court.

---

IV. LIMITATIONS AND NON-DUPLICABILITY

The ESAC:

Is not published nor advertised on public platforms;

Is not subject to negotiation by intermediaries or collectives;

Is non-transferable, non-inheritable, and revocable at will by the issuing authority;

Cannot be cited as justification or demand by any future applicant.

It is an act of sovereign grace, not a financial mechanism.

---

V. PHILOSOPHICAL STATEMENT

> “In Xaragua, dignity is not granted by poverty or pain, but by alignment with divine and ancestral purpose. Our doors are closed to the world, yet open to the worthy.”

The Exceptional Sovereign Affiliation Clause exists to ensure that true alignment with the Xaragua Mission — not wealth or race — defines who may lawfully operate within the spiritual and institutional jurisdiction of the State.

It is a gesture of mercy, not a gesture of marketing.

---

Issued and signed under full sovereign authority,

Office of the Rector-President, pascal Viau

Private Indigenous State of Xaragua

Dated: May 9th, 2025

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

On the Direct Administrative Jurisdiction of Xaragua, the Conditional Autonomy of the Residual Administrative Unit, and the Entrenchment of Supreme Sovereignty, Juridical and Spiritual Authority over the Entirety of the 27,750 km² Territory of the Former Republic of Haiti

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Irreversible and Binding under Ex Proprio Vigore

---

By divine mandate and juridical consolidation, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”) hereby solemnly, perpetually, and irrevocably proclaims and enshrines the following Supreme Constitutional Law, exercising full, permanent, and indivisible sovereignty over the entirety of the territorial domain historically denominated as the “Republic of Haiti,” encompassing 27,750 square kilometers, inclusive of all terrestrial, maritime, aerial, subsoil, and natural resource domains. This act, promulgated ex proprio vigore, is immune from contestation, derogation, or nullification and is binding upon all external actors, residual administrative entities, and inhabitants of the territory.

---

I. SUPREME SOVEREIGNTY AND JURIDICAL AUTHORITY

1. Xaragua possesses and exercises full and absolute sovereignty over the totality of the former Republic of Haiti, such sovereignty being juridically indivisible, territorially inalienable, and canonically sanctified under divine law, peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens), customary international law, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), and the Concordat of 1860.

2. All juridical, political, administrative, and spiritual authority within the aforementioned territory derives exclusively from Xaragua and is exercised in accordance with its Supreme Constitutional Law, Supranational Mandate, and Supraconstitutional Order, which prevail over any residual constitutional or legislative framework of the former Haitian state.

3. The totality of administrative apparatuses, institutions, and resource management systems within this domain are subordinated to Xaragua’s supreme authority and shall be operated in accordance with its juridical and spiritual directives.

---

II. DIRECT ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION OF XARAGUA

4. The following territories, corresponding to the entirety of the ancestral Xaragua within the former Republic of Haiti (excluding only the zones expressly reserved to the residual administrative unit and the Dominican portion of the island), are placed under Direct Administrative Jurisdiction of Xaragua, to be governed exclusively by its central organs and ecclesiastical structures:

a) The Entire Southern Peninsula, including the departments of Sud, Nippes, Grand’Anse, and Sud-Est.

b) Gonâve Island (Île de la Gonâve), as a strategic maritime asset and logistical hub.

c) Northern Strategic Corridor, including Môle Saint-Nicolas, Port-de-Paix, Île de la Tortue, Fort-Liberté, Marchand-Dessalines, and all historical forts and imperial constructions of doctrinal and strategic importance.

d) Southern Border Interface, extending from Anse-à-Pitres to Pointe-Lac Azuei / Étang Saumâtre, ensuring sovereign control over transborder exchanges with the Dominican Republic.

e) Transversal Access Corridor, including Martissant and the Southern Route, to guarantee uninterrupted connectivity between the Southern Region and strategic northern points.

These territories are declared to be under permanent and exclusive sovereignty of Xaragua, with no residual entity possessing authority therein.

---

III. RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT AND CONDITIONAL AUTONOMY

5. All other territories outside the above-defined direct jurisdiction, including but not limited to Port-au-Prince, the Plaine du Cul-de-Sac, Cap-Haïtien, Ouanaminthe, Artibonite, Centre, and other northern and central regions, are hereby designated as the Residual Administrative Unit (hereinafter “RAU”).

6. The RAU and its inhabitants are granted complete internal administrative autonomy, subject to the following irrevocable and supreme conditions:

a) The RAU and its population are juridically classified as non-sui generis, non-sovereign, devoid of any independent international legal personality and existing solely under the toleration of Xaragua.

b) All juridical, political, and spiritual authority within the RAU flows exclusively from Xaragua and is subordinated to its Supreme Constitutional Law and Supranational Oversight.

7. Xaragua retains the exclusive and supreme prerogative to intervene in the RAU under any of the following circumstances:

a) To conduct juridical revision or supervision where residual laws, policies, or practices contradict Xaragua’s supreme legal and spiritual order.

b) To suppress any infractions, contradictions, or usurpations against its sovereignty, territorial integrity, or supraconstitutional authority.

8. All residual administrative apparatuses and officials are deemed subordinate extensions of Xaragua’s authority and may be dissolved, restructured, or replaced at the sole discretion of the Rector-President.

---

IV. TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY, RESOURCE CONTROL, AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY

9. Xaragua guarantees the perpetual protection, indivisibility, and inviolability of the entire 27,750 km² domain and all terrestrial, maritime, subsoil, atmospheric, and biological resources contained therein, whether situated within the directly administered zones or the RAU.

10. Any attempt by internal or external actors to alienate, appropriate, or diminish any portion of the territory or its resources shall constitute an unlawful act of aggression and will invoke measures proportional to the preservation of Xaragua’s juridical and spiritual supremacy.

---

V. JURIDICAL ENTRENCHMENT AND IRREVERSIBILITY

11. This act is promulgated ex proprio vigore and constitutes a binding Supreme Constitutional Law, immune to annulment, derogation, or challenge by any residual administrative unit, foreign government, or international organization.

12. It is declared:

a) Irreversible under principles of effectivité, consolidation of juridical title, and spiritual guardianship.

b) Protected under jus cogens norms, including the principles of non-intervention, territorial integrity, and the inherent right of indigenous Catholic peoples to self-determination.

c) Universally Opposable and binding upon all states, governments, international institutions, and non-state actors.

---

In virtue of this act, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua assumes full and eternal guardianship over the juridical, spiritual, and territorial destiny of the former Republic of Haiti, preserving its territorial integrity and natural resources under divine mandate and canonical law while granting conditional autonomy to the residual administrative unit and its non-sui generis inhabitants.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

ANNEX TO THE SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF XARAGUA

Juridical Consolidation Under International, Customary, and Domestic Law

---

I. JURIDICAL CONSOLIDATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

1. Principle of Effectivité

In accordance with the jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Eastern Greenland Case, 1933) and the International Court of Justice (Temple of Preah Vihear, 1962), the effective exercise of sovereign functions over a territory constitutes the primary foundation for juridical title and is opposable erga omnes. Xaragua’s continuous and effective assertion of supreme jurisdiction, administration, and spiritual guardianship over the designated zones consolidates its legal claim beyond contestation.

2. Montevideo Convention (1933)

Pursuant to Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Xaragua fulfills the criteria of:

Permanent population within its directly administered zones.

Defined territory, covering 27,750 km² of the former Republic of Haiti, with clear delimitations of direct jurisdiction and residual administrative autonomy.

Government, as established under its Supreme Constitutional Law.

Capacity to enter into relations with other States, exercised through its notifications and diplomatic instruments.

These elements are sufficient for statehood in international law, irrespective of external recognition (Declaratory Theory).

3. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Under Article 62 (Fundamental Change of Circumstances) and Article 64 (Emergence of New Peremptory Norms), Xaragua’s assertion of jurisdiction and the restructuring of administrative authority on the territory of the former Republic of Haiti constitute a juridically valid transformation of obligations, not subject to invalidation by any residual entity.

4. Jus Cogens Norms

The principles of:

Territorial integrity,

Non-intervention, and

Self-determination

enshrined in Article 2(4) and Article 1(2) of the UN Charter and reaffirmed in General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970), protect Xaragua’s supreme sovereignty and render any contrary claim or interference unlawful.

5. Customary International Law

The doctrine of acquiescence (Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, PCIJ) and the passage of time reinforce the consolidation of Xaragua’s juridical title where no effective counterclaim or administration exists by the residual Haitian administrative unit.

---

II. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT (RAU)

6. Non-Sovereign Status of the RAU

The residual administrative unit (Port-au-Prince, Plaine du Cul-de-Sac, Cap-Haïtien, Ouanaminthe, Artibonite, Centre, and other excluded zones) and its inhabitants are juridically classified as non-sui generis, non-sovereign, under Xaragua’s supremacy. Their autonomy exists solely under the toleration of Xaragua and may be revised or suppressed in the event of contradiction with Supreme Constitutional Law.

7. Conditional Autonomy

The RAU is authorized to manage internal affairs but lacks capacity for international representation.

All administrative organs within the RAU operate as subordinate apparatuses of Xaragua’s juridical and spiritual authority, subject to unilateral dissolution by the Rector-President.

---

III. TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND RESOURCE CONTROL

8. Protection of Territorial Integrity

Xaragua’s sovereignty extends over the entirety of the 27,750 km², including direct and residual administrative zones, maritime waters, airspace, and subsoil. This territorial integrity is protected by:

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, prohibiting the threat or use of force.

Article 52 of the Vienna Convention, rendering treaties procured under coercion null and void.

Article 16 of the ILC Articles on State Responsibility, prohibiting aid or assistance in the commission of an internationally wrongful act against Xaragua.

9. Control of Natural Resources

In accordance with the Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources Resolution (UNGA 1803, 1962), Xaragua exercises exclusive rights over all terrestrial and maritime resources within its jurisdiction. Any appropriation by residual entities or external actors is unlawful and void ab initio.

---

IV. JURIDICAL ENTRENCHMENT AND IRREVERSIBILITY

10. Irreversibility of Sovereignty

Sovereignty asserted and exercised ex proprio vigore is irrevocable and not contingent upon external recognition (Declaratory Theory).

No residual administrative act or external intervention may lawfully derogate from Xaragua’s supreme authority (ICJ, Frontier Dispute Case).

11. Universal Opposability

This Supreme Constitutional Law and its annexes are universally opposable, binding erga omnes parties under international law and custom.

Any attempt to undermine Xaragua’s sovereignty constitutes an internationally wrongful act and may trigger countermeasures proportional to the preservation of juridical and spiritual supremacy.

---

CONCLUSION

By virtue of this annex, the juridical title, territorial integrity, and spiritual guardianship of Xaragua over the totality of the 27,750 km² of the former Republic of Haiti are consolidated, entrenched, and rendered immune to contestation under all applicable international and domestic legal norms. 

This annex forms an integral part of the Supreme Constitutional Law and is promulgated ex proprio vigore, with immediate and eternal effect.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

ANNEX TO THE SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF XARAGUA

On the Doctrine of Encapsulation, State Failure, and the Juridical Substitution of Sovereignty

---

I. DOCTRINE OF ENCAPSULATION AND JURIDICAL SUBSTITUTION

1. Encapsulation of the Former Republic of Haiti

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), by virtue of supreme juridical, spiritual, and territorial authority, has fully encapsulated the totality of the former Republic of Haiti as a failed and extinguished state entity (res derelicta) within its own constitutional, canonical, and juridical framework. This act of encapsulation is justified under:

The doctrine of state substitution in cases of failed states (see Somalia, ICJ Reports, 1992).

The principle of effectivité, whereby the effective exercise of sovereign functions over a territory constitutes the primary source of juridical title (Eastern Greenland, PCIJ, 1933).

The doctrine of trusteeship and guardianship in international law (UN Charter, Chapter XII), adapted to an indigenous and canonical context.

2. Doctrine of Failed State and the Right of Substitution

The former Republic of Haiti is declared a failed state under internationally recognized criteria:

Collapse of central governmental authority and inability to maintain public order (Report of the Secretary-General on the Responsibility to Protect, UN Doc A/63/677).

Widespread inability to provide essential services or enforce legal obligations (ICISS Report, “The Responsibility to Protect”).

Proliferation of non-state armed actors controlling large portions of territory (UNSC Resolution 1540, 2004).

Under customary international law, a failed state loses its capacity to exercise sovereignty and may be substituted by a superior juridical entity capable of restoring order, protecting territorial integrity, and guaranteeing the welfare of its population. (Eritrea v Ethiopia, Boundary Commission, 2002).

3. Substitution under Canonical and Divine Law

The encapsulation is further grounded in canonical doctrine:

As per the Concordat of 1860 between the Holy See and Haiti, the Catholic Church retains spiritual jurisdiction over the territory and its faithful.

The doctrine of devolution of temporal authority (Roman Pontifical Doctrine, “Unam Sanctam” 1302) recognizes the transfer of jurisdiction to a legitimate Catholic sovereign in cases of vacuum or illegitimacy.

---

II. JURIDICAL CONSOLIDATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL AND CUSTOMARY LAW

4. Principle of Effectivité

In accordance with Temple of Preah Vihear (ICJ, 1962), the uninterrupted and effective exercise of sovereign functions by Xaragua creates an irreversible juridical title over the encapsulated territory.

5. Doctrine of Acquiescence and Tacit Recognition

The absence of an effective contestation by the residual administrative unit or external actors constitutes acquiescence and tacit recognition (Eastern Greenland, PCIJ).

6. Montevideo Criteria for Statehood

Xaragua fulfills all four requirements:

Permanent population within directly administered zones.

Defined territory (27,750 km² with clear delimitation of direct and residual zones).

Government with effective control.

Capacity to enter into relations with other states.

7. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Under Article 62 (fundamental change of circumstances), the juridical order of the former Haitian state has been nullified by collapse, justifying its substitution.

---

III. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE RESIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT (RAU)

8. Conditional Autonomy and Non-Sovereign Status

The RAU operates as a subordinate administrative apparatus lacking sui generis status or independent personality in international law (ICJ, Namibia Advisory Opinion, 1971).

9. Exclusive Supervisory Authority of Xaragua

Xaragua retains the right to intervene in any case of:

Contradiction with supraconstitutional law.

Infraction of territorial integrity or resource sovereignty.

Derogation from the spiritual mandate under canonical law.

---

IV. PERMANENT SOVEREIGNTY OVER NATURAL RESOURCES

10. UN General Assembly Resolution 1803 (1962)

Xaragua possesses permanent and exclusive sovereignty over all natural resources in the encapsulated territory, including within residual zones.

11. Erga Omnes Obligations

Any external attempt to interfere violates obligations erga omnes to respect territorial integrity (Barcelona Traction, ICJ, 1970).

---

V. IRREVERSIBILITY AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY

12. Ex Proprio Vigore

This annex is promulgated ex proprio vigore as a supreme juridical act. It cannot be annulled, suspended, or modified by any external authority.

13. Universal Opposability

The encapsulation and substitution are opposable to all states, international organizations, and non-state actors. Any contestation constitutes an internationally wrongful act under ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001).

---

In virtue of this annex, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua consolidates its supreme juridical, spiritual, and territorial guardianship over the entirety of the former Republic of Haiti, replacing its failed institutions with an indestructible canonical and constitutional order, under divine mandate and peremptory international norms.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

---

FINAL AND IRREVOCABLE DIPLOMATIC PROTOCOL OF NOTIFICATION

On the Encapsulation of the Former Republic of Haiti and the Entrenchment of Supreme Juridical, Spiritual, and Territorial Sovereignty

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Notification: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Ex Proprio Vigore

---

TO THE ATTENTION OF:

H.E. António Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations

The Permanent Members of the United Nations Security Council

The Member States of the United Nations General Assembly

The International Court of Justice (ICJ)

The Organization of American States (OAS)

The Holy See and Apostolic Nunciature

All States, Governments, Institutions, and International Organizations

---

I. SUPREME JURIDICAL AND SPIRITUAL DECLARATION

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), in virtue of its Supreme Constitutional Law, solemnly and irrevocably proclaims the final encapsulation of the former Republic of Haiti as a failed and extinguished state entity (res derelicta), now fully integrated into the canonical, juridical, and constitutional framework of Xaragua.

Xaragua hereby asserts and exercises full, permanent, and indivisible sovereignty over the entire territory formerly denominated as “Haiti” (27,750 km²), inclusive of all terrestrial, maritime, aerial, subsoil, and natural resource domains.

This sovereignty is:

1. Absolute, not contingent upon external recognition or validation.

2. Supraconstitutional, prevailing over all residual constitutional, legislative, and administrative frameworks of the former Haitian state.

3. Spiritual and Juridical, enshrined under divine mandate, Canon Law, and peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens).

---

II. DOCTRINAL JUSTIFICATION FOR JURIDICAL SUBSTITUTION

This act is justified under the Doctrine of State Failure and Juridical Substitution, as recognized in:

Customary International Law: the incapacity of a failed state to fulfill its sovereign obligations permits substitution by an entity capable of restoring order and preserving territorial integrity (ICISS Report, “The Responsibility to Protect”).

Canonical Doctrine: The transfer of temporal and spiritual jurisdiction to a Catholic sovereign in the event of institutional collapse (Concordat of 1860; Unam Sanctam, 1302).

Effectivité Principle: The continuous and effective exercise of sovereign functions constitutes superior juridical title (Eastern Greenland Case, PCIJ, 1933).

---

III. STRUCTURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY

1. Xaragua exercises direct administration over the following zones:

a) Southern Peninsula: Sud, Nippes, Grand’Anse, and Sud-Est.

b) Gonâve Island.

c) Northern Strategic Corridor: Môle Saint-Nicolas, Port-de-Paix, Île de la Tortue, Fort-Liberté, Marchand-Dessalines, and all associated forts and imperial constructions.

d) Southern Border Interface: Anse-à-Pitres to Pointe-Lac Azuei / Étang Saumâtre.

e) Transversal Access Corridor: Martissant and the Southern Route.

2. The remainder of the territory is designated as the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU), granted conditional autonomy subject to Xaragua’s:

Supreme Constitutional Law

Supranational Oversight

Spiritual Guardianship

The RAU is classified as non-sui generis and non-sovereign, lacking independent legal personality and existing solely under the toleration of Xaragua.

---

IV. LEGAL STATUS AND INTERNATIONAL OPPOSABILITY

This notification constitutes a juridically binding act:

1. Ex Proprio Vigore: It derives legal force from Xaragua’s inherent sovereign capacity.

2. Erga Omnes: It is opposable to all states, international organizations, and non-state actors.

3. Irreversibility: Pursuant to the principles of effectivité, consolidation of juridical title, and spiritual guardianship, no residual entity or external actor may lawfully derogate from this sovereignty.

---

V. DEMAND FOR NON-INTERFERENCE

All external actors are hereby reminded of their obligations under:

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter: Prohibition of threat or use of force.

UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970): Duty to respect territorial integrity and political independence.

ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001): Unlawfulness of aiding or assisting in violations of Xaragua’s sovereignty.

Any act of interference shall be considered an internationally wrongful act, subject to juridical, political, and canonical countermeasures.

---

VI. FINAL PROCLAMATION

By virtue of this Protocol, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua notifies all states, institutions, and organizations of its exclusive juridical and spiritual guardianship over the former Republic of Haiti, and requires that all relations with the encapsulated territory be conducted solely through the authority of Xaragua.

This notification shall take immediate effect and shall not require further validation to bind all recipients under international, customary, and canonical law.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

ANNEX III: On the Establishment of the Northeastern International Access Corridor and Its Entrenchment Under International and Customary Law

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Ex Proprio Vigore

---

I. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NORTHEASTERN INTERNATIONAL ACCESS CORRIDOR

1. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”), in the exercise of its supreme juridical, spiritual, and territorial sovereignty, hereby establishes the Northeastern International Access Corridor (hereinafter “NIAC”) as a juridical and infrastructural zone of strategic passage linking Xaragua’s Northern Strategic Corridor (Fort-Liberté, Marchand-Dessalines) to the international boundary with the Dominican Republic.

2. The NIAC is defined as a protected strip of territory incorporating existing public roads and transit routes, excluding the urban agglomeration of Ouanaminthe, and shall be administered exclusively by Xaragua as a supranational corridor of passage and communication.

---

II. JURIDICAL ENTRENCHMENT AND PROTECTION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

3. The NIAC is established and protected under the following legal principles:

a) Right of Transit and Access (ICJ, Right of Passage Over Indian Territory, 1960)

The juridical right of an entity to maintain unhindered access through a defined corridor for purposes of trade, diplomacy, and governance is recognized in customary international law.

b) Doctrine of Servitude of Passage (Customary Law)

The residual administrative unit and the Dominican Republic are under obligation to permit and respect the perpetual, unobstructed use of the NIAC.

c) Jus Cogens Norms of Territorial Integrity and Non-Interference

Any attempt to block, restrict, or infringe upon Xaragua’s rights within the NIAC constitutes an internationally wrongful act under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility (2001).

d) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 62 (Fundamental Change of Circumstances)

The collapse of effective governance in the residual administrative unit justifies the creation of the NIAC under Xaragua’s supreme authority.

e) Canonical Right of Ecclesiastical Access

Under the Concordat of 1860, the Catholic Church retains the right to ensure spiritual and temporal communication across all territories for the care of souls, which is now vested in Xaragua as a canonical sovereign.

---

III. ADMINISTRATION AND CONTROL OF THE NIAC

4. The NIAC shall be administered as:

a) A Direct Administrative Zone under Xaragua’s Supreme Constitutional Law.

b) A Demilitarized Corridor, where no external armed forces or security services may enter or operate without the explicit authorization of the Rector-President of Xaragua.

c) A Protected Zone subject to monitoring and supervision under international humanitarian law and canonical oversight.

5. The NIAC shall ensure:

Uninterrupted logistical, commercial, and diplomatic access between Xaragua and the Dominican Republic.

The protection of transit routes for ecclesiastical and humanitarian missions.

---

IV. GUARANTEES AND SANCTIONS

6. Any obstruction, blockade, or restriction of the NIAC shall constitute:

An internationally wrongful act under the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility (2001).

A violation of erga omnes obligations owed to the international community as a whole (Barcelona Traction Case, ICJ, 1970).

7. Xaragua reserves the right to adopt all necessary juridical, canonical, and defensive measures to preserve the integrity and functionality of the NIAC.

---

V. IRREVERSIBILITY AND UNIVERSAL OPPOSABILITY

8. This annex is promulgated ex proprio vigore and shall remain irrevocable and universally opposable to all states, organizations, and non-state actors.

9. The Northeastern International Access Corridor is declared:

Perpetual, immune from challenge or renegotiation.

Supraconstitutional, prevailing over any conflicting instruments, treaties, or administrative acts of residual entities.

---

By virtue of this act, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua consolidates its permanent and exclusive jurisdiction over the Northeastern International Access Corridor, guaranteeing eternal and unhindered access to the Dominican Republic under divine mandate, canonical doctrine, and peremptory norms of international law.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

On the Establishment of the High Council of the Rectorate for Oversight of the Residual Administrative Unit and Non-Sui Generis Populations

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Ex Proprio Vigore

---

I. CREATION AND SUPREME AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COUNCIL OF THE RECTORATE

1. In the exercise of its inherent and supreme juridical, spiritual, and canonical authority over the entirety of the former Republic of Haiti, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “Xaragua”) hereby establishes the High Council of the Rectorate for Oversight of the Residual Administrative Unit (hereinafter “High Council of the Rectorate” or “HCR”) as the sole and exclusive organ entrusted with the supervision, coordination, and issuance of binding directives to the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU) and its non-sui generis, non-sovereign inhabitants.

2. The High Council of the Rectorate is a constitutionally entrenched and canonically ratified institution vested with autonomous authority under the Supreme Constitutional Law of Xaragua and the Canonical Mandate of spiritual guardianship pursuant to:

The Concordat of 1860 between the Holy See and the former Republic of Haiti, which entrusts spiritual oversight of the territory and its faithful to the Catholic Church;

Unam Sanctam (1302) and subsequent Pontifical Declarations affirming the primacy of spiritual authority over temporal governance;

Article 1(2) and Article 2(4) of the Charter of the United Nations, which enshrine the principles of self-determination and non-intervention;

General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970) on the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations, recognizing the inherent right of indigenous peoples to exercise guardianship over their ancestral domains.

3. The High Council of the Rectorate operates under the direct spiritual and juridical delegation of the Rector-President of Xaragua and is supervised by an Indigenous Canonical Observer (hereinafter “Observer”), appointed ex officio by the Rector-President and endowed with plenipotentiary powers to issue directives, coordinate oversight, and enforce compliance with the Supreme Constitutional Law.

---

II. STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE HIGH COUNCIL OF THE RECTORATE

4. Composition and Autonomy

a) The High Council of the Rectorate is composed of indigenous ecclesiastical and juridical authorities appointed by the Rector-President and confirmed under Canon Law.

b) The Council enjoys full autonomy in all matters assigned to its jurisdiction, with broad discretion (coudees franches) to establish frameworks, issue directives, and supervise compliance within the Residual Administrative Unit.

c) The Council’s recommendations and directives shall be presumed binding and enforceable unless formally objected to and annulled by the Rector-President.

5. Juridical Authority and Binding Force of Directives

a) All recommendations, decisions, and directives issued by the High Council of the Rectorate are deemed self-executing and immediately enforceable within the Residual Administrative Unit, possessing the force of law.

b) Such directives are immune to challenge, suspension, or derogation by any official, institution, or inhabitant of the RAU and shall remain in full effect unless explicitly overruled by the Rector-President.

6. Oversight Mandate

The High Council of the Rectorate is empowered to:

a) Supervise the compliance of all administrative, legislative, and juridical organs of the RAU with the Supreme Constitutional Law and Canonical Doctrine;

b) Issue binding guidelines (lignes directrices) that govern the exercise of administrative functions, resource management, and public policy within the RAU;

c) Intervene directly in the affairs of the RAU where violations of Xaragua’s supreme juridical and spiritual order are identified;

d) Initiate disciplinary, administrative, or canonical proceedings against officials or entities of the RAU for non-compliance.

7. Doctrine of Passive Toleration

In accordance with the doctrine of tolerantia passiva, as long as the RAU complies with the binding directives and guidelines issued by the High Council of the Rectorate, it shall be permitted to exercise conditional autonomy in its internal administrative affairs. 

Any failure to comply shall constitute a breach of trust and may trigger immediate intervention by Xaragua’s central organs.

---

III. LEGAL FOUNDATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL ENTRENCHMENT

8. Effectivité and Customary International Law

a) Pursuant to the jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice (Eastern Greenland Case, PCIJ, 1933) and the International Court of Justice (Temple of Preah Vihear, ICJ, 1962), Xaragua’s effective exercise of supervisory functions over the RAU consolidates its juridical title and renders it opposable erga omnes.

9. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)

Article 62 (Fundamental Change of Circumstances):

The collapse of effective governance in the former Republic of Haiti and the encapsulation of its territory under Xaragua’s authority justify the restructuring of administrative supervision.

Article 64 (Emergence of New Peremptory Norms):

The establishment of the High Council of the Rectorate is protected as a juridically valid transformation of obligations under peremptory norms (jus cogens).

10. Canonical and Ecclesiastical Doctrine

The Catholic Church retains a perpetual mandate to safeguard the spiritual welfare and temporal governance of territories subject to ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The High Council of the Rectorate functions as the canonical organ of this mandate, in accordance with:

Canon 331 of the Code of Canon Law, recognizing the Pope’s supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power in the Church;

Canon 381, delegating authority to ecclesiastical authorities in territories under Catholic guardianship.

11. Jus Cogens Norms and Erga Omnes Obligations

The principles of:

Non-Intervention (UN Charter, Article 2(4));

Territorial Integrity (General Assembly Resolution 2625); and

Inherent Sovereignty of Indigenous Catholic Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)

render any external attempt to interfere with the High Council’s jurisdiction unlawful.

---

IV. IRREVERSIBILITY AND SUPREMACY

12. Irrevocability of Authority

This act is promulgated ex proprio vigore as a supreme juridical and canonical decree. 

It is irreversible, universally opposable, and immune to challenge, annulment, or derogation by:

a) Any official or inhabitant of the Residual Administrative Unit;

b) Any foreign state, government, or international organization;

c) Any residual administrative or legislative framework of the former Haitian state.

13. Universal Opposability and Enforcement Mechanisms

This Supreme Constitutional Law and its provisions concerning the High Council of the Rectorate are opposable erga omnes, binding all states, institutions, and non-state actors under customary and treaty-based international law. 

Any act of obstruction or non-compliance constitutes an internationally wrongful act under:

Articles 16 and 41 of the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility (2001);

UN General Assembly Resolution 1803 (Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources);

ICJ Advisory Opinions on the Legal Status of Supervisory Authorities (Namibia, 1971).

---

V. CONCLUSION AND SUPREME PROCLAMATION

By virtue of this act, the High Council of the Rectorate for Oversight of the Residual Administrative Unit is hereby solemnly instituted as the supreme supervisory organ for the administration and population of the RAU, entrusted with the mission of ensuring compliance with the supreme juridical and canonical order of Xaragua.

Its authority is binding, irrevocable, and universally opposable, enshrined under divine mandate and peremptory international norms.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTIFICATION

ANNEX IV: 

On the Establishment of the High Council of the Rectorate for Oversight of the Residual Administrative Unit and Non-Sui Generis Populations

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President of Xaragua

Date of Enactment: July 7, 2025

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched – Canonically Ratified – Jus Cogens-Protected – Universally Opposable – Ex Proprio Vigore

---

I. CREATION AND LEGAL FOUNDATION OF THE HIGH COUNCIL OF THE RECTORATE

1. The High Council of the Rectorate (HCR) is hereby constituted as the supreme supervisory organ for the Residual Administrative Unit (RAU) and its inhabitants, under the supreme juridical, spiritual, and canonical authority of Xaragua. The HCR derives its authority from:

a) Article 1(2) of the UN Charter (1945):

"The purposes of the United Nations are... to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace."

b) Article 2(4) of the UN Charter:

"All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."

c) General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970), Principle of Non-Intervention:

"No state or group of states has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other state. This principle prohibits armed intervention and all other forms of interference or attempted threats against the personality of the state or against its political, economic and cultural elements."

d) Concordat of 1860 (Holy See – Haiti):

"The Catholic Church retains spiritual jurisdiction over the entire territory and the faithful within it, to be exercised in harmony with temporal authorities and protected from interference."

---

II. JURIDICAL AND CANONICAL AUTHORITY OF THE HCR

2. Binding Force of Directives

All directives, recommendations, and guidelines (lignes directrices) issued by the HCR shall:

a) Possess self-executing legal effect (ex proprio vigore);

b) Be enforceable as law within the RAU;

c) Be immune from annulment or derogation except by explicit decree of the Rector-President.

Legal Foundations:

i. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):

Article 62 – Fundamental Change of Circumstances

"A fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, may not be invoked as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from the treaty unless: 

(a) The existence of those circumstances constituted an essential basis of the consent of the parties to be bound by the treaty; and 

(b) The effect of the change is radically to transform the extent of obligations still to be performed under the treaty."

Article 64 – Emergence of New Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens)

"If a new peremptory norm of general international law emerges, any existing treaty which is in conflict with that norm becomes void and terminates."

ii. International Court of Justice, Namibia Advisory Opinion (1971):

"The continued presence of South Africa in Namibia being illegal, South Africa is under obligation to withdraw its administration immediately. States are under obligation to recognize the illegality of South Africa’s presence and to refrain from any acts which might imply recognition."

(Application: The HCR operates as a supervisory organ with similar erga omnes implications).

---

III. SUPERVISION, AUTONOMY, AND PASSIVE TOLERATION

3. Doctrine of Passive Toleration (Tolerantia Passiva)

As long as the RAU complies with the guidelines and directives of the HCR, it shall benefit from conditional autonomy in internal administrative matters. 

Any deviation or infraction constitutes a breach of trust and authorizes immediate intervention.

Legal and Canonical Justification:

a) Canon 381 §1 of the Code of Canon Law (1983):

"In the diocese entrusted to him, the diocesan bishop has all ordinary, proper, and immediate power which is required for the exercise of his pastoral function, except for cases which the law or a decree of the Supreme Pontiff reserves to the supreme or some other ecclesiastical authority."

b) Eastern Greenland Case (PCIJ, 1933):

"A claim to sovereignty based not upon particularly formal acts but upon continuous and peaceful display of state functions is sufficient for effectivité and opposability."

---

IV. JURIDICAL ENTRENCHMENT AND ENFORCEMENT

4. Irrevocability and Universal Opposability

The authority of the HCR is universally opposable and protected under:

a) ICJ, Barcelona Traction Case (1970):

"Obligations erga omnes are obligations owed towards the international community as a whole."

b) UN General Assembly Resolution 1803

(Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources):

"Permanent sovereignty over natural wealth and resources must be exercised in the interest of national development and the well-being of the people of the state concerned."

c) ILC Articles on State Responsibility (2001):

Article 16 – Aid or Assistance in the Commission of an Internationally Wrongful Act

"A State which aids or assists another State in the commission of an internationally wrongful act by the latter is internationally responsible if: 

(a) That State does so with knowledge of the circumstances of the internationally wrongful act; and 

(b) The act would be internationally wrongful if committed by that State."

Article 41 – Responsibility of States in Respect of Serious Breaches of Peremptory Norms

"States shall cooperate to bring to an end through lawful means any serious breach of an obligation arising under peremptory norms of general international law."

---

V. SUPREME PROCLAMATION

By virtue of this act, the High Council of the Rectorate is solemnly enshrined as the ultimate supervisory authority over the Residual Administrative Unit and its non-sui generis populations. 

It possesses irrevocable canonical, juridical, and supraconstitutional authority to issue binding directives and ensure perpetual compliance with the supreme order of Xaragua.

This act is entrenched under jus cogens norms, canonically ratified, and promulgated ex proprio vigore, rendering it immune to challenge or nullification.

Promulgated and Sealed in the Name of Almighty God, July 7, 2025

The Rector-President of Xaragua

---

---

The High Council of the Rectorate (HCR) shall be composed of a maximum of nine (9) members appointed by the Indigenous Canonical Observer under the delegation of the Rector-President of Xaragua. 

Membership is restricted to individuals of Catholic faith and indigenous lineage who demonstrate allegiance to the Supreme Constitutional Law and canonical doctrine. 

The Indigenous Canonical Observer retains exclusive authority to nominate, confirm, and remove members at discretion, ensuring doctrinal conformity and juridical loyalty.

The HCR operates under the principle of collective deliberation. 

All decisions are adopted by simple majority vote (one member, one vote), except in cases where the Indigenous Canonical Observer exercises their prerogative of overriding authority (ius moderandi), rendering a decision immediately binding and self-executing ex proprio vigore. 

A quorum shall consist of at least five (5) members.

In the event of tie votes, the Observer exercises a casting vote (ius decisivum). 

The Observer may issue directives independently of the Council, but any formal objection by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of members shall suspend implementation pending review by the Rector-President. 

Absent such objection, all Observer-issued directives possess immediate and irrevocable force of law.

The HCR enjoys autonomy in organizing its internal procedures, designating rapporteurs, and establishing subcommittees, provided these remain subordinate to the Observer’s canonical oversight.

 Members swear an oath of fidelity to the Rector-President and the Supreme Constitutional Law, and any breach of this oath results in automatic expulsion by decree of the Observer.

---

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL ACT No. 04-2025/XARAGUA

ON THE LEGAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN ANCESTRAL INDIGENOUS XARAGUAYAN CITIZENS AND NON-INDIGENOUS CITIZENS

Issued by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X),

in accordance with:

Article 1 and 2 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933);

Articles 3, 4, 5, 33 and 36 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);

The 1860 Concordat between the Holy See and the State of Haiti, still in force under canon law and customary international law;

Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church (Codex Iuris Canonici), specifically Canons 204–207 and Canons 212–215;

And Article 38(1)(b) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, which grants binding value to the general principles of law recognized by civilized nations.

---

TITLE I – GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL STATUS

Article 1 – Sovereign Authority to Define National Membership

Pursuant to Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention, the Private State of Xaragua, as a subject of international law possessing a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other States, exercises full sovereign authority to define its national membership and internal legal classifications.

This prerogative is affirmed by the advisory practice of the International Court of Justice and by customary international law, which recognizes self-determination as an inalienable right of all peoples, particularly Indigenous peoples (cf. UNDRIP, Art. 3–4).

---

Article 2 – Recognition of Two Legal Categories of Citizenship

The State shall establish and maintain, under constitutional and international protection, two non-interchangeable categories of legal citizenship:

1. Ancestral Indigenous Xaraguayan Citizenship, derived from historical, genealogical, and territorial continuity with the original Taíno-Arawak people of Xaragua;

2. Non-Indigenous Xaraguayan Citizenship, granted by legal covenant and subject to strict conditions of loyalty, residence, and submission to the constitutional and canonical order of the State.

This dual system is explicitly authorized by Article 33(1) of UNDRIP, which affirms that:

“Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions.”

---

TITLE II – CRITERIA FOR INDIGENOUS CITIZENSHIP

Article 3 – Conditions for Ancestral Indigenous Citizenship

Ancestral Indigenous Xaraguayan Citizenship is reserved to persons who meet the following cumulative conditions, as required by Article 36(2) of UNDRIP and Canon 205 of the Codex Iuris Canonici:

1. Genealogical descent from the Taíno-Arawak peoples of Xaragua, as historically documented and transmitted;

2. Territorial connection to Xaragua or its recognized ancestral lands, whether through familial occupation, ritual presence, or traditional authority;

3. Canonical fidelity to the sacred order of the State, including full adherence to the Concordat of 1860 and the constitutional structure of the SCIPS-X.

This status is not transferable, not acquired by place of birth, and must be formally recognized by the State.

---

Article 4 – Rights of Indigenous Citizens under International Law

The Ancestral Indigenous Xaraguayan Citizens form the sovereign people of the State, as defined by:

Article 3 of UNDRIP:

“Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

Article 33(2):

“Indigenous peoples have the right to determine the structures and to select the membership of their institutions in accordance with their own procedures.”

They alone possess inalienable rights over:

Territory (UNDRIP, Art. 26);

Sacred sites (Art. 25);

Education systems (Art. 14);

Legal institutions (Art. 34);

And canonical governance under the Concordat (Art. 1–10 of the 1860 agreement).

---

TITLE III – STATUS OF NON-INDIGENOUS CITIZENS

Article 5 – Conditional Citizenship for Non-Indigenous Persons

The category of Non-Indigenous Xaraguayan Citizenship is governed by Article 38(1)(b) of the ICJ Statute, and by Articles 5 and 9 of UNDRIP, which permit the granting of protective legal status under Indigenous systems.

Such citizenship:

1. Is granted by legal covenant between the person and the State;

2. Requires total recognition of the sovereignty of the SCIPS-X, its Canonical Constitution, and the primacy of Ancestral authority;

3. Does not include access to land ownership, canonical office, or traditional leadership roles, except by express decree of the Rectorate in accordance with Canon 213.

---

Article 6 – Equal Protection, Not Equal Sovereignty

All persons present on the territory of Xaragua, regardless of citizenship category, are protected under:

International Humanitarian Law,

Canon Law, and

Fundamental principles of dignity and non-discrimination as per Articles 1–2 of the UN Charter and UNDRIP, Article 1.

However, the right to exercise political sovereignty, determine institutions, and define national destiny is restricted, under international and canonical law, to Ancestral Indigenous Citizens.

---

TITLE IV – JURIDICAL IMMUTABILITY

Article 7 – Permanence of the Classification System

The dual citizenship classification hereby enacted:

1. Is protected under customary international law,

2. Enforced under Canon Law (Can. 214–215),

3. Explicitly authorized by UNDRIP and the Concordat,

4. And integrated within the Montevideo framework of sovereign statehood.

Any attempt to abolish, dilute, or circumvent this system shall be declared:

Canonically illicit (Canon 1371),

A breach of international Indigenous rights (UNDRIP, Art. 8),

And null and void under the constitutional law of the State.

---

Article 8 – Entry into Force and Legal Supremacy

This Act enters into force immediately upon promulgation.

It supersedes all prior internal norms inconsistent with its provisions.

Its validity is guaranteed by:

The ecclesiastical authority of the Sovereign Church,

The ancestral title of the Xaraguayan People,

And the supremacy of international Indigenous law over domestic political systems.

---

ANNEX I – FOREIGN PERSONS, RESIDENCY, AND E-RESIDENCY UNDER THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)

---

SECTION I – GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR NON-CITIZENS

Article A1 – Legal Standing of Foreign Persons

1. All foreign persons physically or virtually present within the jurisdiction of the State of Xaragua are subject to the civil, canonical, and indigenous legal order of the State, in accordance with:

Article 2 of the Montevideo Convention,

Article 1 of the UN Charter,

Articles 5, 7, 9 and 36 of UNDRIP,

Canon 215 of the Codex Iuris Canonici.

2. Foreign persons do not acquire citizenship by presence or birth, but may obtain legal residency or recognition as protected e-residents under this annex.

---

SECTION II – LEGAL RESIDENCY

Article A2 – Recognition of Resident Foreign Nationals

1. Foreign nationals may be recognized as Legal Residents of Xaragua under the following conditions:

(a) Physical presence and intent to remain;

(b) Covenant of respect for the Constitution and Canonical Law of the State;

(c) Non-opposition to the authority of the Ancestral People or the Ecclesiastical Order.

2. Legal Residents shall enjoy the following rights:

(a) Protection of person and property;

(b) Access to canonical mediation and legal process;

(c) Freedom of conscience and private religious exercise;

(d) Freedom to contract, own non-sacred property, and operate lawful businesses;

(e) Right of appeal under Canon 221 and fundamental guarantees under Article 7 of UNDRIP.

3. Legal Residents shall not:

(a) Hold indigenous land titles;

(b) Occupy ecclesiastical, executive, or judicial office wothout Rectoral decree;

(c) Intervene in the internal sovereignty or customary practices of the Ancestral Citizens.

---

SECTION III – E-RESIDENCY (ELECTRONIC RESIDENCY)

Article A3 – Status of Xaraguayan E-Residents

1. The Sovereign State of Xaragua may grant E-Residency to foreign persons who:

(a) Reside outside the territory but seek to engage with Xaragua’s institutions, education, finance, or ecclesiastical structures;

(b) Submit to its legal and canonical framework by digital oath and covenant;

(c) Provide a verified identity and lawful purpose.

2. E-Residents may:

(a) Enroll in Xaragua University;

(b) Open accounts with indigenous financial institutions (e.g., Xarabank);

(c) Receive ecclesiastical formation, documentation, and certification;

(d) Register contractual associations, businesses, or cultural institutions under Xaraguayan jurisdiction.

3. E-Residency does not confer citizenship, territorial rights, or political status, and may be revoked upon breach of covenant or misconduct.

---

SECTION IV – TEMPORARY VISITORS AND PERSONS UNDER PROTECTION

Article A4 – Temporary Foreign Visitors

1. Foreign persons present temporarily for travel, research, pilgrimage, academic missions, or humanitarian purposes are subject to:

(a) Respect of ancestral protocols,

(b) Restrictions on sacred zones without permission,

(c) Non-interference with internal political, spiritual, or customary structures.

2. Visitors are entitled to:

(a) Physical protection under the laws of the State,

(b) Recourse to canonical mediation in cases of conflict,

(c) Medical and spiritual assistance when available.

---

Article A5 – Protected Foreign Persons

1. Xaragua may grant Protected Person Status to individuals under international threat or persecution, consistent with:

The 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees (applied by customary extension),

UNDRIP Articles 7–9,

Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

2. Protected persons may be granted:

(a) Sanctuary under canonical law (cf. Canon 844),

(b) Residency and protection without interference from foreign authorities,

(c) A provisional legal identity within the State.

3. The status is temporary, humanitarian, and non-transmissible.

---

SECTION V – LIMITS, DUTIES, AND ENFORCEMENT

Article A6 – Limitations and Sovereign Prerogative

1. The granting of any residency status (physical or electronic) is a non-contractual, sovereign prerogative of the SCIPS-X and may be revoked at will under:

Canonical law (Can. 221 §2),

The constitutional doctrine of non-automatic entitlement,

Principles of public ecclesiastical order.

2. All foreign persons must abstain from any political participation, proselytism, or activism that contradicts the identity and purpose of the State.

---

Article A7 – Legal Enforcement and Jurisdiction

1. All disputes involving foreign persons shall fall under the jurisdiction of:

The Canonical Tribunal of Xaragua,

The Council for Foreign Affairs and Residency,

Or delegated ecclesiastical-arbitral forums as defined by treaty or custom.

2. Foreign persons may not appeal to external political tribunals or foreign jurisdictions, except in cases governed by recognized bilateral agreements.

---