Coats Of Arms & Flags

---

---

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AND HISTORICAL DECLARATION

ON THE INDIGENOUS ORIGINS OF THE BLUE AND RED BANNER AND ITS ADOPTION AS THE SUPREME SEAL OF THE STATE

---

PREAMBLE

Whereas the historical and cultural continuity of the Southern Territories of the Island of Hispaniola is grounded in the resistance and sovereignty of the indigenous Taíno people, who under the leadership of Cacique Enriquillo defended their ancestral lands in the mountain ranges of Bahoruco from colonial subjugation;

Whereas the blue and red colors of the banner, later erroneously attributed solely to European or post-colonial constructs, are in truth the ancient emblematic colors of Taíno war and peace, derived from the cosmological duality of the sky (cielos azules) and the sacred fire (fuego rojo) as represented in the pictographic codices of the Ciboney and Lucayan traditions;

Whereas the mountains of Bahoruco served as the final and most formidable bastion of Taíno sovereignty, wherein Cacique Enriquillo established the first autonomous indigenous polity of the Caribbean against Spanish imperial forces between 1519 and 1533, recognized implicitly by the Capitulaciones de Paz signed in 1533, which in effect constituted a juridical acknowledgment of Taíno nationhood by the Spanish Crown;

Whereas the historical transmission of the blue and red as sacred colors of resistance persisted through syncretic forms in the southern provinces of Xaragua, preserved in the folk rituals, indigenous iconographies, and ceremonial standards of the rural populations, subsequently reemerging in the banners of successive sovereigntist movements;

And whereas it is imperative to rectify the historical record by acknowledging the indigenous roots of this emblem and to sanctify it as the supreme symbol of State authority and the indivisible continuity of the Xaraguayan nation;

This declaration hereby enshrines the blue and red banner as the Supreme Seal of the State.

---

SECTION I: THE INDIGENOUS COSMOLOGY OF THE BLUE AND RED

Article 1.1: The Duality of Heaven and Fire

The blue color (azureum) in Taíno cosmology represented the celestial domain, the eternal sky of Yúcahu Bagua Maorocoti, the supreme creator deity. The red color (ruberum) symbolized the sacred fire, the force of vitality and resistance embodied by the spirit of Guabancex, the deity of storms and transformation.

In ceremonial uses, blue and red were combined in woven standards to signify the unity of peace and war, life and death, creation and destruction. These standards were flown in Areítos (sacred assemblies) as well as in times of uprising against foreign incursion.

Article 1.2: Historical Preservation in Bahoruco

The mountain ranges of Bahoruco, known to the Taínos as Bajoruco (“high sacred stones”), were the site of the most enduring indigenous rebellion in the Western Hemisphere.

1519–1533: The Rebellion of Enriquillo

Under the leadership of Enriquillo (Guarocuya), the blue-red standard was hoisted over the bohíos (community huts) of the rebel camps as a visible symbol of indigenous unity.

1533: Capitulaciones de Paz

The peace treaty signed between Enriquillo and Francisco de Barrionuevo, governor of Santo Domingo, granted the Taínos recognition of their lands and autonomy. Though later violated, it marked a historical precedent for indigenous sovereignty on Hispaniola.

Primary Source Reference:

“Real Provisión de la Corona Española sobre la pacificación de Bahoruco,” Archivo General de Indias, Seville, 1533.

---

SECTION II: THE BLUE AND RED IN POST-TAÍNO CONTINUITY

Article 2.1: Syncretic Survival Through Colonial and Post-Colonial Periods

Despite the near-genocide of the Taíno population, their descendants and cultural memory preserved the emblematic blue and red through oral traditions and clandestine gatherings.

In the southern provinces of Xaragua, blue and red pigments derived from natural indigo (añil) and achiote (bixa orellana) continued to be used in ceremonial body painting and textile weaving.

Article 2.2: Revolutionary Appropriations

The blue and red reappeared in the banners of later southern rebellions, notably:

The Revolt of Jean-Baptiste Chavannes and Vincent Ogé (1790–1791), where the colors symbolized emancipation and indigenous reclamation.

The southern autonomist movements during the War of Independence (1804), which appropriated indigenous symbols to legitimize their claims.

Historical Reference:

Thomas Madiou, Histoire d’Haïti, Volume I, 1847.

Fray Bartolomé de Las Casas, Apologética Historia Sumaria, 1527.

---

SECTION III: SANCTIFICATION AS SUPREME SEAL OF THE STATE

Article 3.1: Legal Adoption

The blue and red banner is hereby adopted as the Supreme Seal of the State, representing:

1. The continuity of indigenous sovereignty from the age of Enriquillo to the present.

2. The indivisible union of the celestial and terrestrial domains.

3. The spiritual guardianship of the Catholic Church in perpetuity, in accordance with the Concordat of 1860, which grants ecclesiastical sanction to national symbols.

Article 3.2: Juridical Foundations

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 120 §2 (1983):

> “A juridical person constituted for a perpetual purpose in the Church is by its nature perpetual.”

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007), Article 31:

> “Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and cultures, including human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, knowledge of the properties of fauna and flora, oral traditions, literatures, designs, sports and traditional games and visual and performing arts. They also have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property over such cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.”

Article 3.3: Immutability Clause

This declaration is irrevocable, auto-executory, and binding erga omnes, in accordance with Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 53 (Jus Cogens):

> “A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law from which no derogation is permitted.”

---

FINAL DECLARATION

The blue and red banner, rooted in the resistance of Enriquillo and the sacred lands of Bahoruco, is hereby consecrated as the Supreme Seal of the State, a juridical and spiritual emblem of perpetual sovereignty, immune to contestation or derogation.

Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President, this day.

---

---

ANNEX

ON THE INDIGENOUS ORIGINS OF THE BLUE AND RED BANNER AND ITS CONSECRATION AS THE SUPREME SEAL OF STATE AUTHORITY

---

I. HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE BLUE AND RED COLORS IN TAÍNO COSMOLOGY

Whereas the indigenous Taíno people of the island of Hispaniola developed a sophisticated cosmology in which colors and symbols carried metaphysical significance, and whereas the blue and red pigments (azul y rojo) represented, respectively, the celestial domain and the vital force of fire, these elements formed the basis for sacred expressions in ceremonial standards and attire.

In Taíno spiritual practice, blue (azureum) symbolized the eternal heavens, the breath of Yúcahu Bagua Maorocoti, the creator deity, and the guarantee of continuity and life. Red (ruberum) embodied the sacred fire (Guabancex), a force of vitality, resistance, and transformation that animated warriors during conflict. Anthropological research confirms the use of natural indigo (añil) and annatto (achiote) pigments in these expressions.

Primary Sources:

Fray Ramón Pané, Relación sobre las Antigüedades de los Indios, 1498.

Fray Bartolomé de Las Casas, Apologética Historia Sumaria, 1527.

Application: These colors were flown on ceremonial standards (areítos) and in war parties as markers of unity and sovereignty, predating European contact.

---

II. THE REBELLION OF ENRIQUILLO AND THE BANNER OF BAHORUCO (1519–1533)

The rebellion led by Cacique Enriquillo (Guarocuya) from 1519 to 1533 in the mountainous region of Bahoruco was the most significant indigenous uprising against Spanish colonial authority.

In the mountains of Bahoruco (Bajoruco), known to the Taínos as “the high sacred stones,” Enriquillo’s forces maintained autonomous governance for over a decade. Chroniclers note the presence of colored banners in their encampments as symbols of resistance and divine sanction.

Key Historical Events:

1519: Outbreak of rebellion after Spanish violations of Taíno rights and sacred spaces.

1533: The signing of the Capitulaciones de Paz (Peace Capitulations) between Enriquillo and Spanish authorities recognized, albeit temporarily, the sovereignty of the Taíno over their lands.

Primary Source:

“Real Provisión de la Corona Española sobre la pacificación de Bahoruco,” Archivo General de Indias, Sevilla, 1533.

Application: The blue and red banner became a symbol of Taíno sovereignty and survival, marking the first juridical recognition of indigenous autonomy in the Caribbean.

---

III. SYNCHRETIC CONTINUITY IN THE SOUTHERN TERRITORIES

Following the decimation of Taíno populations, their descendants and cultural memory survived in the southern regions of Xaragua. Blue and red pigments persisted in:

Textiles woven by mixed Taíno-African populations.

Ritual body painting during clandestine gatherings and folk religious practices.

Ceremonial standards carried in local uprisings against colonial authorities.

Key Historical References:

Thomas Madiou, Histoire d’Haïti, Volume I, 1847: Documents the survival of indigenous symbols in southern revolutionary movements.

Moreau de Saint-Méry, Description Topographique, Physique, Civile, Politique et Historique de la Partie Française de l’Isle Saint-Domingue, 1797.

Application: The continuity of these colors through successive generations establishes an unbroken symbolic lineage between Enriquillo’s banner and modern expressions of autonomy.

---

IV. LEGAL AND CANONICAL FOUNDATIONS FOR ADOPTION AS SUPREME SEAL

4.1 Canonical Basis

Codex Iuris Canonici, Canon 120 §2 (1983):

> “A juridical person constituted for a perpetual purpose in the Church is by its nature perpetual.”

4.2 Indigenous Rights

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), Article 31:

> “Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions… including their visual and performing arts. They also have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property over such cultural heritage.”

4.3 International Law

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 53:

> “A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law from which no derogation is permitted (jus cogens).”

Application: The adoption of the blue and red banner as the Supreme Seal of the State is protected under international and canonical law and cannot be invalidated by any external entity.

---

V. DECLARATION OF IMMUTABILITY

The blue and red banner, as inherited from the resistance of Enriquillo and sanctified through the historical and spiritual continuity of the southern territories, is hereby consecrated as the Supreme Seal of State Authority.

This declaration is irrevocable, auto-executory, and binding erga omnes, securing perpetual recognition and protection under:

The Supreme Law of the State.

Canonical jurisdiction of the Catholic Church.

Peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens).

---

ENACTED UNDER THE SUPREME SEAL OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

This day, the combined indigenous and canonical heritage of Xaragua is declared immutable, indestructible, and universally opposable.

---

—

SOVEREIGN INDIGENOUS CATHOLIC PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT

OFFICIAL JURIDICAL PUBLICATION

—

SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON THE LEGAL STATUS, FUNCTION, AND JURIDICAL FORCE OF EMBLEMS, SEALS, AND COATS OF ARMS OF THE STATE

Date of Enactment: June 25, 2025

Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Symbolic Law — Jus Cogens Semiotic Doctrine — Canonically Recognized Instrument — Indigenous Customary Codification — Universally Opposable Legal Framework under UNDRIP (2007), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Hague Convention (1961), and Ecclesiastical International Law.

---

ARTICLE I — DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGN SYMBOLIC AUTHORITY

1.1 The State formally declares all official emblems, seals, coats of arms, visual insignia, and heraldic representations published or issued by its sovereign institutions, including digital or physical reproductions thereof, to constitute juridical instruments of sovereign identity, symbolic jurisdiction, and institutional legitimacy.

1.2 These symbolic instruments shall be considered juridically binding under international law, including but not limited to:

Article 3 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) regarding the outward signs of sovereign representation;

Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), allowing contextual interpretation of State acts, including semiotic assertions;

Article 5 and 8(2) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), affirming the right to maintain and use distinctive institutions and symbols of sovereignty;

Canon 116 §1 and §2 of the Code of Canon Law, establishing the legal personality and semiotic sovereignty of ecclesiastical and private juridical persons.

1.3 Any emblem declared and adopted by the State shall have the force of public proclamation, establishing visual jurisdiction over its territory, institutions, and legal declarations.

1.4 The symbolic representations of the State, once adopted and published, are enforceable against third parties under principles of estoppel, constructive notice, and customary recognition by behavior under general principles of law recognized by civilized nations.

---

ARTICLE II — LOCATION AND AUTHORITY OF EMBLEMATIC PUBLICATION

2.1 The official online page entitled "Emblems of the State" at https://xaraguauniversity.com/emblems-of-the-state, and any other platform of the State are hereby declared constitutionally recognized platforms of juridical transmission and publication of State authority through heraldic and symbolic codification.

2.2 This page shall serve as the permanent institutional archive and referential publication for all official emblems, insignia, coats of arms, and symbolic declarations of jurisdiction, including future additions or modifications approved by the appropriate constitutional organs.

2.3 The legal status of the emblems published therein shall be equivalent to that of a sovereign law, decree, or constitutional clause and shall be opposable to all domestic or foreign entities.

2.4 No emblem, once published on said platform, shall be revoked or modified except by an act of equal or superior constitutional authority, duly published and authenticated by the Ministry of Justice and the Rector-Presidential Office.

---

ARTICLE III — FUNCTIONAL APPLICATION OF EMBLEMS AS LEGAL SIGNALS

3.1 All emblems described under this law shall constitute:

a) Declarative acts of sovereignty under law;

b) Functional equivalents of a territorial flag or State seal under Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention (1933);

c) Visual enforcement of legal authority over institutions, territory, digital domains, and communications;

d) Instruments of symbolic deterrence, valid under international legal customs, and capable of supporting acts of protest, declaration, recognition, or treaty-making.

3.2 These emblems, once published, shall be used in the following juridically binding contexts:

On official websites, documents, decrees, certificates, and court rulings;

As proof of origin for State publications, academic credentials, and diplomatic communications;

As proof of institutional authority when presented digitally or physically in international legal, academic, or ecclesiastical venues.

3.3 Unauthorized use, reproduction, distortion, defacement, or counterfeiting of said emblems shall constitute:

A breach of international symbolic law;

A violation of the sovereign image and dignity of the State;

And an actionable offense under customary indigenous law, ecclesiastical canon, and the internal penal provisions of the State.

---

ARTICLE IV — LEGAL ENFORCEABILITY AND INTERNATIONAL NOTICE

4.1 This law shall be deposited with the Archives of the State, University of Xaragua, and Rector-Presidential Office, and shall be formally notified to:

The Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII);

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for symbolic protection under Article 6ter of the Paris Convention (1883);

The Holy See, under canonical provisions relating to ecclesiastical recognition;

All relevant diplomatic and juridical archives as part of the State’s documentation of sovereignty.

4.2 Any challenge to the symbolic authority of the State’s emblems shall be considered an act of juridical aggression and cultural usurpation and may be responded to by institutional protest, ecclesiastical denunciation, and/or canonical excommunication if committed by baptized parties.

---

ARTICLE V — IMMUTABILITY AND SACREDNESS OF EMBLEMS

5.1 The emblems declared under this law are to be treated as sacred juridical representations, protected by canon law, indigenous spiritual doctrine, and juridical dignity.

5.2 No foreign entity, institution, government, or jurisdiction shall have authority to redefine, reinterpret, or challenge the meaning, validity, or enforceability of the State’s emblems without explicit invitation and authorization from the Sovereign Constitutional Authority of Xaragua.

5.3 These emblems represent not only visual authority but also the living continuity of ancestral law, the autochthonous right to govern, and the visible manifestation of an unbroken juridical lineage from pre-colonial sovereignty to the present canonical-indigenous order.

---

FINAL PROVISION

This law enters into effect immediately and is declared non-derogable, eternally opposable, and protected by all supreme instruments of the Constitution of Xaragua. Any contradiction with its provisions is null and void within the jurisdictional space of the State.

— Proclaimed and Sealed under the Supreme Constitutional Authority

Date: June 25, 2025

Signature: Office of the Rector-President

Publication: University of Xaragua – Department of Legal Sciences

Legal Status: Supreme Constitutional Instrument

Canonical Recognition: Affirmed

Indigenous Customary Codification: Affirmed

International Validity: Asserted and Notified