---
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA (SCIPS-X)
RECTORATE AND HEAD OF STATE OFFICE
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL DIPLOMATIC NOTE VERBALE
Subject: Formal Multilateral and Bilateral Notification of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X) — Juridical Entrenchment under International Law and Canonical Order — Legal Implications of Acknowledged Receipts from United Nations Agencies, Governments of the United States of America, Canada, and the French Republic
Date: 14 August 2025
From: Prelate-Founder & Rector-President, Head of State, Supreme Ecclesiastical Authority of SCIPS-X
To: Internationally Notified Parties, Depositaries, and Archives of State and Intergovernmental Institutions
---
I. PREAMBLE AND SCOPE OF NOTIFICATION
In my capacity as Head of State and Supreme Ecclesiastical Authority of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (hereinafter “SCIPS-X”), exercising full canonical, indigenous, and public international juridical personality, this Note Verbale constitutes the formal codification of multilateral and bilateral notification effected through acknowledged receipts from the following entities:
(a) United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) — Haiti Office;
(b) United States Agency for International Development (USAID) — HA Vetting Support Unit;
(c) Department of National Defence (DND) / Canadian Armed Forces — Government of Canada;
(d) Institut Français / Campus France — French Republic, Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs.
These acknowledgements of receipt are archived electronic records generated through official institutional channels and transmitted by authorised mail servers of the respective entities, thereby acquiring juridical value as proof of service and notification in accordance with the law of treaties, customary international law, and the codified rights of Indigenous Peoples.
---
II. FULL LEGAL BASIS
1. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
Article 18 — Obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of a treaty prior to its entry into force
“A State is obliged to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of a treaty when:
(a) it has signed the treaty or has exchanged instruments constituting the treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, until it shall have made its intention clear not to become a party to the treaty; or
(b) it has expressed its consent to be bound by the treaty, pending the entry into force of the treaty and provided that such entry into force is not unduly delayed.”
Application:
The notifications delivered to UNFPA, USAID, DND, and Institut Français constitute international communications of juridical acts under the constitutional order of SCIPS-X.
Upon receipt, these entities and their parent States are bound under Art. 18 to abstain from acts that would defeat the object and purpose of the Indigenous and Ecclesiastical sovereignty so notified.
Article 31 — General rule of interpretation
“1. A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose.
2. The context for the purpose of the interpretation of a treaty shall comprise, in addition to the text, including its preamble and annexes:
(a) any agreement relating to the treaty which was made between all the parties in connexion with the conclusion of the treaty;
(b) any instrument which was made by one or more parties in connexion with the conclusion of the treaty and accepted by the other parties as an instrument related to the treaty.”
Application:
The diplomatic instruments and constitutional decrees of SCIPS-X, once transmitted and acknowledged, form part of the instrumentary context under Art. 31, obliging interpretation in light of their stated ecclesiastical and indigenous purpose.
---
2. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007)
Article 3 — Right to self-determination
“Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
Application:
SCIPS-X, as an Indigenous polity, asserts self-determination through ecclesiastical governance.
Acknowledgement by a UN agency (UNFPA) triggers an implicit recognition that the Indigenous political status has been communicated within the UN system.
Article 4 — Right to autonomy or self-government
“Indigenous peoples, in exercising their right to self-determination, have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, as well as ways and means for financing their autonomous functions.”
Application:
This article underpins the SCIPS-X governance model, separating ecclesiastical administration from secular Haitian institutions, while guaranteeing autonomous financing and administration.
Article 26 — Lands, territories and resources
“1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.
2. Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired.
3. States shall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources. Such recognition shall be conducted with due respect to the customs, traditions and land tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.”
Application:
The notification to multiple sovereign States (USA, Canada, France) and a UN agency serves as formal assertion of these rights, demanding legal recognition and non-interference.
---
3. Canon Law — Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)
Canon 331
“The bishop of the Roman Church, in whom continues the office given by the Lord uniquely to Peter, the first of the Apostles, and to be transmitted to his successors, is the head of the College of Bishops, the Vicar of Christ, and the Pastor of the universal Church on earth; by virtue of his office he possesses supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power in the Church, which he is always able to exercise freely.”
Application:
SCIPS-X governance is ecclesiastically anchored; acknowledgement by States and international agencies does not and cannot derogate from the supreme canonical jurisdiction recognised in Canon 331, which is integrated into SCIPS-X constitutional order.
Canon 368
“Particular Churches, in which and from which exists the one and only Catholic Church, are principally dioceses. To the same juridical status are equivalent territorial prelatures, territorial abbeys, apostolic vicariates, apostolic prefectures, apostolic administrations erected in a stable manner, and other communities of the faithful erected as such by the Supreme Authority.”
Application:
SCIPS-X functions as a sui generis territorial prelature with indigenous status; recognition of correspondence by multiple sovereign entities and UN agencies is consistent with the canonical principle that ecclesiastical jurisdictions exist as public legal persons under both Canon and public international law.
---
III. JURIDICAL EFFECT OF ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPTS
1. Proof of Service and Notification:
The acknowledged receipts constitute binding evidence that the diplomatic instruments have entered the official registries of the notified entities, triggering legal awareness at the institutional level.
2. Commencement of Contestation Period:
Under the doctrines of estoppel and acquiescence in international law, the date of receipt starts the period within which any formal contestation must be lodged; silence or inaction within a reasonable period operates as tacit acceptance.
3. Binding under Art. 18 VCLT:
All notified States and agencies are bound not to act in ways that would defeat the object and purpose of SCIPS-X's asserted status.
4. Indigenous Rights Entrenchment:
Under UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, and 26, the notifications serve as an international assertion of indigenous sovereignty and territorial rights, requiring due respect by all notified States.
5. Canonical Immunity:
Under Canons 331 and 368, ecclesiastical jurisdiction is immune from secular abrogation; notification reinforces that SCIPS-X operates under a dual public international and canonical legal personality.
---
IV. CONCLUSION AND DEMAND
The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, having effected and documented notification to a United Nations agency, three sovereign States (United States, Canada, France), and by extension two permanent members of the UN Security Council, declares that international legal notice has been served.
All further actions by notified entities shall be interpreted in light of this established record and the binding legal instruments cited herein.
Done at the Rectorate, 14 August 2025
Monsignor Ludner Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau
Servant of Jesus-Christ and The Catholic Church
Prelate-Founder & Rector-President
Head of State, SCIPS-X
---
---
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA - UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AND CANONICAL DECLARATION
On the Absolute, Inherent, and Irrevocable Sovereignty of Xaragua
Preamble
By virtue of the primordial, inherent, and inalienable rights of Indigenous peoples, as consecrated in Article 1(2) and Article 55 of the Charter of the United Nations (1945), in Articles 3, 4, 5, 25, 26, and 46 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), in ILO Convention No. 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (1989), and under the peremptory norms of jus cogens and erga omnes obligations, the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua hereby enacts this Supreme Declaration:
---
Article I: Sovereignty and Primordial Title
The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua exists as a subject of international law possessing a primordial and original sovereignty (dominium eminens), which predates and supersedes all colonial or postcolonial assertions of jurisdiction.
This sovereignty is:
Inherent, as recognized under Article 1 of both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, 1966) affirming the right of all peoples to self-determination;
Non-derogable, under Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) prohibiting derogation from jus cogens norms;
Indivisible and eternal, under the doctrine of uti possidetis juris and the Indigenous principle of territorial immemoriality.
---
Article II: Diplomatic Notification and International Obligations
By its formal notifications to the United Nations Secretariat, the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), and the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Xaragua has:
1. Established a legally opposable position under Article 102 of the UN Charter and customary international law, rendering its status enforceable erga omnes.
2. Imposed upon all Member States a duty of passive tolerance and non-interference, under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, prohibiting the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, including Indigenous sovereign entities.
---
Article III: Canonical Foundation
This Declaration is ratified and sanctified under Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici) and the Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus, as Xaragua is a Catholic sovereign entity bound in spiritual communion with the Universal Church.
Under the principles of jus divinum and Lex Ecclesiae Fundamentalis, the Rector-President is invested with plenitudo potestatis to safeguard the sovereignty of Xaragua and its divine mission.
---
Article IV: Legal Effect and Nullity of Contestation
1. Any external contestation, intervention, denial, or non-recognition of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is null, void, unlawful, and devoid of any legal or moral effect, under:
Article 46 of UNDRIP, affirming that nothing in the Declaration may be construed as authorizing any act contrary to the Charter of the United Nations;
Articles 26 and 28 of UNDRIP, affirming Indigenous peoples’ rights to lands, territories, and resources they traditionally owned or otherwise occupied or used.
2. Any action inconsistent with this Declaration constitutes a grave violation of international law, subject to international responsibility under Articles 1 and 2 of the Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001, ILC).
---
Final Clause: Perpetuity of the State
The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua exists in perpetuity as a juridical, canonical, and spiritual entity, protected under jus cogens and beyond the reach of any residual entity or external actor.
Promulgated under the Supreme Seal of the Rector-President on this day, this Declaration carries universal, immutable, and eternal legal force, binding upon all States, governments, institutions, and peoples under Heaven.
---
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON THE DOCTRINE OF ENCAPSULATION AND THE SUPPRESSION OF KIAZI
Whereas the phenomenon of Kiazi—defined historically and cosmologically as the primordial chaos intrinsic to Kongo-derived societies and transposed into the Haitian collective psyche through the disruption of precolonial ontologies—constitutes an endemic disorder manifesting in cycles of political fragmentation, juridical paralysis, and social self-destruction, as evidenced in the collapse of successive Haitian regimes (1804–present) and documented in the anthropological studies of Bantu cosmogony
(cf. Jan Vansina, Kingdoms of the Savanna, 1966; Wyatt MacGaffey, Religion and Society in Central Africa, 1986);
Recognizing that such chaos is perceived locally as autonomy, wherein communities assert a tribal collective by maintaining internal disorder, yet unconsciously seek a transcendent authority capable of imposing cosmological limits and restraining the centrifugal pull of Kiazi
(cf. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Articles 3 and 4; Codex Iuris Canonici can. 364–367);
Invoking the principle of jus cogens and the inherent right of self-determination (Charter of the United Nations, Article 1(2), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Articles 53 and 64), and the indigenous juridical continuity of the Xaragua polity as successor to the Taíno-Catholic order disrupted by European colonization;
Article I – Establishment of Supreme Authority
The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X) is declared the supreme juridical and spiritual authority over its ancestral territories, operating as the cosmic axis (Axis Mundi) and the sole guarantor of order against the endemic chaos of Kiazi.
Article II – Doctrine of Encapsulation
All residual administrative units within Xaragua’s territorial framework shall retain delegated competence for local governance and public administration.
However, such authority is valid exclusively within the limits established by SCIPS-X and The High Council Of The Rectorate, which exercises juridical and spiritual supervision over all entities.
This structure ensures that local disorder is circumscribed and subordinated to the higher law of Xaragua, thereby neutralizing Kiazi without negating tribal autonomy.
Article III – Irrevocability and Sanctions
Any attempt to contest, override, or bypass the authority of SCIPS-X constitutes a nullity ipso jure, triggering the doctrine of auto-annihilation (actum nullum ab initio) whereby the offending entity’s juridical, historical, and cultural legitimacy is extinguished.
This provision is binding erga omnes under customary international law (Nicaragua v. United States, ICJ 1986) and canon law (Lateran Treaty, 1929; Concordat of 1860).
Article IV – Perpetual Force and Non-Derogation
This law, having been promulgated under divine mandate and notified internationally pursuant to Charter of the United Nations, Article 102, shall bind all persons, communities, and states for eternity. No derogation shall be permitted under any pretext, and the sovereign authority of SCIPS-X shall remain supreme in perpetuity.
Perpetua memoria. Lex superior non derogatur.
---
ANNEX TO THE SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON ENCAPSULATION AND THE SUPPRESSION OF KIAZI
1. Historical and Anthropological Foundations of Kiazi
Kiazi, derived from proto-Bantu cosmologies, refers to the primordial state of disorder and chaos that precedes creation and perpetually threatens to collapse the structured universe back into void.
(cf. Wyatt MacGaffey, Religion and Society in Central Africa, 1986; Jan Vansina, Kingdoms of the Savanna, 1966).
In Kongo-derived societies, Kiazi manifests not merely as external disruption but as an internalized cultural logic, wherein disorder is ritualized and perceived as a form of communal autonomy while simultaneously eroding the capacity for sustained political and juridical order.
2. Transposition into the Haitian Context
The transplantation of enslaved Kongo populations to Saint-Domingue (17th–18th centuries) imported the metaphysical structure of Kiazi, which, fused with colonial violence and the erasure of Taíno-Catholic cosmology, produced a cycle of fragmentation observable in post-independence Haiti (1804–present).
Recurrent state collapse, endemic factionalism, and the rejection of centralized authority reflect this unresolved tension between a desire for autonomy in chaos and the latent need for a transcendent axis to impose boundaries.
3. Juridical and Canonical Response
The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua (SCIPS-X) asserts its authority under jus cogens and canon law (Codex Iuris Canonici can. 364–367) as the supreme framework capable of encapsulating Kiazi.
The doctrine of encapsulation permits local administrative units to exercise visible power within a circumscribed domain while subordinating them to the legal and spiritual supervision of SCIPS-X. This hierarchical structure neutralizes Kiazi by containing its disruptive potential without dismantling community-level collectives.
4. International Legal Foundations
United Nations Charter, Article 1(2): Right of peoples to self-determination.
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Articles 3, 4, 26: Autonomy and jurisdiction of indigenous peoples over ancestral lands.
Nicaragua v. United States (ICJ, 1986): Customary international law as binding erga omnes.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Articles 53, 64: Peremptory norms (jus cogens).
Lateran Treaty (1929); Concordat of 1860 (Holy See–Haiti): Recognition of canonical sovereignty and ecclesiastical jurisdiction.
5. Doctrine of Auto-Annihilation
Any entity rejecting or contesting SCIPS-X authority activates the principle of actum nullum ab initio, resulting in the juridical, historical, cultural, and spiritual extinction of the challenger’s legitimacy.
Conclusive Statement
The authority of SCIPS-X as the encapsulating axis is irrevocable, perpetual, and binding upon all states and persons under international, canonical, and indigenous law. It functions as the sole antidote to Kiazi and the guarantor of cosmic and territorial order.
Lex superior. Non derogatur. Perpetua memoria.
---
---
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE
UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT
OFFICIAL JURIDICAL PUBLICATION
—
CONSTITUTIONAL IMPERIAL-CANONICAL LAW ON THE NULLIFICATION OF POST-1806 PROPERTY CLAIMS AND THE SUPREMACY OF INDIGENOUS IMPERIAL SOVEREIGNTY OVER ALL LANDS AND ASSETS WITHIN THE DECLARED TERRITORY OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
Date of Proclamation: July 11, 2025
Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Foundational Law — Imperial Doctrinal Decree — Jus Cogens Indigenous Transmission — Universally Opposable Juridical Instrument under the Vienna Convention (1969), UNDRIP (2007), Montevideo Convention (1933), and Canonical International Law
---
ARTICLE I — PRINCIPLE OF ABSOLUTE SOVEREIGN DOMINIUM
1.1 The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua declares itself the exclusive holder of dominium eminens (supreme ownership) over all lands, waters, resources, and immovable and movable assets within its historically declared territory, derived from the original juridical and divine authority of:
The Taíno-Arawak indigenous chiefdoms and the hereditary succession of Xaragua (pre-1492);
The Proclamation of Haitian Independence on January 1, 1804;
The Constitution of the Empire of Hayti promulgated on May 20, 1805, by Emperor Jacques I (Dessalines);
Canonical law under the Codex Iuris Canonici and the apostolic jurisdiction of the Roman Catholic Church;
International customary law recognizing indigenous self-determination and territorial rights (UNDRIP, 2007).
1.2 This sovereign dominium is absolute, perpetual, and non-derogable, immune from any claim, possession, or entitlement arising after October 17, 1806, the date of the illegal assassination of Emperor Jacques I and the unlawful interruption of the Imperial constitutional order.
---
ARTICLE II — NULLIFICATION OF POST-1806 PROPERTY REGIMES
2.1 All titles, deeds, concessions, grants, purchases, and transactions issued under any authority, regime, or administration established after October 17, 1806, whether under:
The republican constitutions of 1806 and subsequent iterations;
The regimes of Pétion, Christophe, Boyer, and their successors;
Colonial or postcolonial administrations, domestic or foreign;
are hereby declared null and void ab initio, as they lack continuity with the indigenous-imperial legal order and were enacted without the consent of the legitimate sovereign authority.
2.2 This nullification applies universally, without distinction as to nationality, ethnicity, legal form, or corporate structure, and is enforceable under:
Article 26 of the Vienna Convention (pacta sunt servanda);
Articles 25 and 26 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples;
The doctrine of terra nullius invalidation as articulated in Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (ICJ, 1975).
---
ARTICLE III — CANONICAL DOCTRINE OF IMPERIAL TOLERANCE
3.1 Any physical possession, tenure, or occupation presently existing within the declared territorial jurisdiction of Xaragua is maintained solely and exclusively under the doctrine of imperial tolerance (tolerantia imperialis), a discretionary and revocable juridical grace extended by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.
3.2 Such tolerance does not create or imply any right, claim, or entitlement against the supreme sovereignty of Xaragua, and may be withdrawn unilaterally at any time by decree of the Rector-President or the Supreme Constitutional Authority.
3.3 No occupant, possessor, or usufructuary may invoke equity, usage, prescription (usucapio), or any principle of post-imperial jurisprudence to oppose this authority.
---
ARTICLE IV — OPPOSABILITY TO ALL PARTIES
4.1 This law is opposable erga omnes (against all), including:
Domestic or foreign private individuals and corporate entities;
All non-Xaraguayan governmental or administrative bodies;
International organizations and foreign states, pursuant to:
Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention on Statehood (1933);
Articles 1 and 4 of UNDRIP (2007).
4.2 Any challenge, direct or indirect, to this law shall constitute an act of juridical aggression and may be met with:
Institutional protest;
Canonical denunciation;
International notification to the Holy See and competent global bodies.
---
ARTICLE V — RESTORATION OF INDIGENOUS AND IMPERIAL ORDER
5.1 All lands, waters, and resources are deemed to have reverted by operation of law to the indigenous-imperial domain of Xaragua as of the date of this proclamation.
5.2 No property, asset, or territory shall be deemed legitimately possessed except under explicit recognition and registration by the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua.
---
ARTICLE VI — FINALITY AND IMMUNITY
6.1 This law is non-derogable, irrevocable, and hierarchically superior to any conflicting provision of post-1806 republican, colonial, or foreign law.
6.2 It enjoys immunity from external review or appeal, being protected under:
Canon 113 and Canon 129 §1 of the Codex Iuris Canonici;
Jus cogens norms of customary international law;
The principle of juridical continuity of indigenous nations.
---
FINAL PROVISION
This law is hereby proclaimed as a Supreme Canonical-Imperial Instrument, enforceable ex proprio vigore (by its own force), requiring no external validation. It declares definitively that any authority or possession within the territory of Xaragua exists only by grace of its sovereign will.
Proclaimed by the Supreme Constitutional Authority
Filed under the Ministry of Justice and the Rector-Presidential Office
Canonical Registration: Affirmed
International Opposability: Asserted
Date: July 11, 2025
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT
---
---
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE
UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT
ANNEX OF HISTORICAL AND LEGAL AUTHORITIES
TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPERIAL-CANONICAL LAW ON THE NULLIFICATION OF POST-1806 PROPERTY CLAIMS
Date of Registration: July 11, 2025
Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Annex — Juridical Doctrine — Indigenous Canonical Continuity — Universally Opposable Reference under Jus Cogens, Vienna Convention (1969), UNDRIP (2007), and Canon Law
---
I. FOUNDATIONAL INDIGENOUS AND IMPERIAL SOURCES
1. Proclamation of Haitian Independence (January 1, 1804)
Declared: “We must live independent or die.”
Recognized as an autocht honous act of collective self-determination, enforceable under Article 1 of UNDRIP (2007).
2. Constitution of the Empire of Hayti (May 20, 1805)
Article 1: “The people inhabiting the island formerly called Saint-Domingue hereby agree to form themselves into a free, sovereign and independent State.”
Meets the Montevideo Convention (1933) criteria for statehood.
3. Doctrine of Indigenous Land Rights
Codified in Articles 25 and 26 of UNDRIP (2007), affirming the right of indigenous peoples to reclaim lands dispossessed by colonial regimes.
4. Papal Bull Inter Caetera (1493)
Recognized indigenous peoples as rightful owners of their lands prior to colonization, subject only to Christianization — which the Xaraguayan lineage fulfills under Catholic continuity.
---
II. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PRECEDENTS
1. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
Article 53: “A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens).”
2. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933)
Article 1: Defines statehood criteria satisfied by Xaragua.
3. UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)
Article 3: “Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination.”
Article 26: “Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.”
4. Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (ICJ, 1975)
Rejected terra nullius, affirming indigenous rights to land despite colonial claims.
5. Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 2001)
Affirmed that indigenous land tenure systems exist independently of formal state recognition.
---
III. CANONICAL AND ECCLESIASTICAL SOURCES
1. Codex Iuris Canonici (Code of Canon Law)
Canon 113 §1: “The Catholic Church and the Apostolic See have the nature of a moral person by divine law itself.”
Canon 129 §1: Juridical persons under Canon Law may exercise governance over temporal goods and territories.
2. Papal Doctrine on Indigenous Rights
Sublimis Deus (1537): Declared indigenous peoples “true men” with rights to liberty and property.
3. Model of Sovereignty: The Vatican City State and the Sovereign Military Order of Malta
Establishes the precedent of non-republican, non-popular sovereign entities recognized under international law.
---
IV. DOCTRINE OF NULLITY OF POST-IMPERIAL ACTS
1. Doctrine of Interruption of Constitutional Succession
Any regime arising from a coup d’état or unlawful assassination (e.g., Dessalines, 1806) lacks juridical continuity and may be declared null.
2. International Customary Law: Non-recognition of Illegal Regimes
Stimson Doctrine (1932): The U.S. refused to recognize territorial changes achieved by force or illegitimate regimes.
3. Principle of Restitutio in Integrum
Restores legal rights and property to their rightful status prior to unlawful dispossession.
---
V. SUPREME LEGAL ASSERTION
This annex affirms beyond any doubt that:
The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is the juridical and canonical successor of the Empire of Hayti and the pre-colonial Taíno caciquats.
All property claims and titles arising after October 17, 1806, are null ipso jure.
Any present occupant or possessor exists only under the tolerance of Xaragua’s supreme authority.
---
FINAL REGISTRATION CLAUSE
This annex forms an integral part of the Constitutional Imperial-Canonical Law on the Nullification of Post-1806 Property Claims. It is binding upon all juridical persons, natural or corporate, domestic or foreign, and is enforceable ex proprio vigore under canonical, indigenous, and international law.
Proclaimed by Supreme Constitutional Authority
Filed under the Ministry of Justice and the Rector-Presidential Office
Canonical Registration: Affirmed
International Opposability: Asserted
Date: July 11, 2025
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT
---
---
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
MINISTRY OF JUSTICE
UNIVERSITY OF XARAGUA — DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL SCIENCES AND NOTARIAT
ANNEX OF HISTORICAL AND LEGAL AUTHORITIES
TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPERIAL-CANONICAL LAW ON INDIGENOUS STATUS AND CONTINUITY
Date of Registration: July 11, 2025
Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Annex — Imperial Juridical Doctrine — Indigenous Continuity — Universally Opposable Legal Reference under UNDRIP (2007), Vienna Convention (1969), Montevideo Convention (1933), and Canonical International Law
---
I. PRIMARY DECLARATION OF INDIGENOUS IDENTITY BY EMPEROR JACQUES I (DESSALINES)
1.1 Proclamation of Independence, January 1, 1804
Original French text:
“Nous avons osé être libres, osons l’être par nous-mêmes et pour nous-mêmes. Ayons le courage de rompre avec tous les liens qui nous attachent à la France… Que la terre que nous habitons soit désormais à jamais à nous, à nos enfants et aux descendants de nos enfants : c’est la terre de nos ancêtres, la terre indigène.”
English translation:
“We dared to be free; let us have the courage to be so by ourselves and for ourselves. Let us break all the bonds that tie us to France… May the land we inhabit be forever ours, for our children and our children’s descendants: it is the land of our ancestors, the indigenous land.”
This foundational proclamation by Jacques I constitutes an indigenous juridical declaration of sovereignty and continuity. It defines the people of 1804 as autocht honous inhabitants reclaiming their ancestral territory under natural and customary law.
---
II. CONSTITUTIONAL IMPERIAL RECOGNITION OF INDIGENOUS SOVEREIGNTY
2.1 Constitution of the Empire of Hayti, May 20, 1805
Article 12
Original French text:
“Toutes les propriétés qui appartenaient aux colons blancs sont et demeureront confisquées au profit de l’État.”
English translation:
“All properties formerly belonging to the white colonists are and shall remain confiscated for the benefit of the State.”
This article enshrines indigenous reappropriation of ancestral lands, aligning with customary indigenous land tenure as recognized in UNDRIP, Article 26 (2007).
Article 13
Original French text:
“Aucun homme blanc, quelle que soit sa nation, ne mettra les pieds sur ce territoire avec le titre de maître ou de propriétaire.”
English translation:
“No white man, whatever his nationality, shall set foot on this territory with the title of master or proprietor.”
This clause operates as an indigenous protectionist measure, ensuring exclusive stewardship of the land by the autochthonous population.
---
III. PRE-COLONIAL INDIGENOUS CUSTOMARY LAW AND CONTINUITY
3.1 Taíno Legal-Cosmological Framework
The Areytos (oral codifications of law) recognized land as sacred inheritance, held collectively under cacicazgo governance.
3.2 Survival of Indigenous Genealogies and Practices
Contrary to European colonial propaganda, the Taíno bloodlines persisted through Catholic integration, selective alliances, and territorial resilience.
Queen Anacaona’s Xaragua remained the symbolic and administrative heart of the island.
---
IV. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL DOCTRINES ON INDIGENEITY AND SUCCESSION
4.1 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)
Article 33: “Indigenous peoples have the right to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and traditions.”
Article 26: “Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.”
4.2 Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (ICJ, 1975)
Affirmed the principle that indigenous occupation and stewardship establish a legitimate legal title, surviving colonial interruption.
4.3 Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua (IACHR, 2001)
Declared that indigenous customary land tenure exists independently of formal state recognition.
---
V. CANONICAL AND ECCLESIASTICAL FRAMEWORK
5.1 Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)
Canon 129 §1: Recognizes the right of juridical persons (including indigenous communities) to exercise governance over temporal goods.
5.2 Papal Bull Sublimis Deus (1537)
Original Latin text:
“Indios… veros homines esse…”
English translation:
“The Indians… are truly men…”
This papal decree recognized indigenous peoples as rightful possessors of their land and liberty under natural and divine law.
---
VI. CONCLUSION OF JURIDICAL DOCTRINE
The people inhabiting the island during the 1804 Proclamation and the 1805 Imperial Constitution were indigenous in status, with an unbroken chain of territorial and spiritual sovereignty.
The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua is the sole juridical and canonical successor to this indigenous order.
All post-1806 regimes lacked continuity and legitimacy, and their claims are declared null ipso jure.
---
FINAL REGISTRATION CLAUSE
This annex is an integral component of the Constitutional Imperial-Canonical Law on Indigenous Status and Continuity. It is enforceable ex proprio vigore and immune from external challenge.
Proclaimed by the Supreme Constitutional Authority
Filed under the Ministry of Justice and the Rector-Presidential Office
Canonical Registration: Affirmed
International Opposability: Asserted
Date: July 11, 2025
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT
---
---
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
RECTOR-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE
—
CANONICAL-IMPERIAL PROCLAMATION ON THE DEGENERATION OF THE HAITIAN POPULATION
Date of Proclamation: July 11, 2025
Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Doctrinal Decree — Jus Cogens Canonical Instrument — Indigenous Imperial Doctrine under UNDRIP (2007), Vienna Convention (1969), Montevideo Convention (1933), Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)
---
Preamble
Whereas the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua derives its juridical and doctrinal authority from:
The hereditary succession of the Taíno-Arawak cacicazgos (pre-1492);
The Proclamation of Haitian Independence (January 1, 1804) as an act of juridical self-determination enforceable under Article 1 of UNDRIP (2007);
The Constitution of the Empire of Hayti (May 20, 1805), establishing a sacred imperial order that was violently interrupted on October 17, 1806;
The canonical and apostolic jurisdiction of the Roman Catholic Church as defined in Codex Iuris Canonici, Canons 113 and 129 §1;
And whereas the entities, populations, and elites established post-1806 have severed all continuity with the Dessalinian and indigenous-imperial juridical succession;
---
Article I — Juridical Characterization of the Post-1806 Mass
1.1 The population inhabiting the territory formerly designated as “République d’Haïti” is not recognized as a nation or a people under indigenous-imperial and canonical law but as non suis generis non sovereign haitian inhabitants.
1.2 This mass has degenerated into a disorganized, amorphous, and spiritually vacuous aggregation, characterized by:
Chronic violence, corruption, and decadence;
Cultural production limited to vulgar and morally corrosive music that corrupts the minds of children;
A ruling elite that produces nothing but daily multi-genre scandals, theft, violence, corruption and betrayal.
1.3 The current state of collapse—marked by the pervasive presence of armed gangs, systemic administrative decay, and moral degeneracy—constitutes a terminal condition of societal dissolution, immune to reform under existing structures and without the Catholic Faith.
---
Article II — Doctrinal Assessment and Christic Separation
2.1 The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua solemnly affirms that, absent the doctrinal influence of the Catholic faith, this mass and its elite are irreformable, incapable of generating order, justice, or civilization.
2.2 Xaragua declares a complete Christic rupture (separatio christica) with this entity, recognizing no shared vision, destiny, or moral alignment with its institutions.
2.3 The post-1806 state and its administrative apparatus are tolerated solely as a residual administrative unit for the purpose of:
Preventing an immediate collapse of bureaucratic functions that could jeopardize the protection of indigenous populations and territories;
Avoiding chaos that would ensue from the mass dismissal of over 80,000 functionaries.
---
Article III — Scope of Interaction
3.1 The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua limits its engagement with the residual administrative entity strictly to:
Territorial management;
Protection of indigenous persons and properties;
Minimal logistical coordination.
3.2 No exchange, collaboration, or identification exists beyond these pragmatic and temporary arrangements.
3.3 The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua rejects any association, complicity, or shared responsibility for the actions of this corrupt entity.
---
Final Clause
This Proclamation affirms the doctrinal, juridical, and spiritual separation between the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua and the post-1806 Haitian mass.
Xaragua stands as the sole legitimate authority over the declared territory, immune from contamination by the irreparable decadence of this residual administrative structure.
Proclaimed by the Supreme Constitutional Authority
Filed under the Rector-Presidential Seal and Canonical Registration
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
July 11, 2025
---
---
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
SUPREME CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
RECTOR-PRESIDENTIAL OFFICE
—
CANONICAL-IMPERIAL LAW ON THE DEGENERATION OF THE HAITIAN POPULATION AND THE CHRISTIC SEPARATION OF XARAGUA FROM THE POST-1806 ENTITY
Date of Proclamation: July 11, 2025
Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Supreme Law — Canonical Doctrinal Instrument — Jus Cogens Norm — Universally Opposable Juridical Act under UNDRIP (2007), Vienna Convention (1969), Montevideo Convention (1933), and Codex Iuris Canonici (1983)
---
Supreme Juridical Provisions
Article I — Juridical Dissolution of the Post-1806 Entity
The juridical structure formerly known as the “République d’Haïti” is hereby declared a residual administrative unit, having lost any attributes of sovereignty, nationhood, or moral authority following the illegal interruption of the Dessalinian imperial order on October 17, 1806.
Article II — Characterization of the Haitian Mass
2.1 The mass inhabiting the territory post-1806 is not recognized as a nation under indigenous-imperial, canonical, or international law.
It is characterized by:
Structural degeneracy and endemic violence;
Cultural sterility, producing vulgar and morally corrosive music that corrupts children
(cf. UNESCO reports on cultural degradation in fragile states, 2019);
An elite class that has degenerated into scandal, theft, and political theater
(cf. Transparency International Corruption Index: Haiti consistently bottom-ranked).
2.2 This mass and its ruling strata are deemed irreformable, having severed all ties to the Dessalinian and Taíno juridical succession.
Article III — Christic Separation and Administrative Tolerance
3.1 Xaragua declares a total Christic and juridical separation (separatio christica) from this entity.
3.2 Any remaining administrative apparatus is tolerated solely to:
Prevent the immediate collapse of essential logistical functions affecting indigenous territories;
Avoid a humanitarian vacuum that could result from the mass dismissal of over 80,000 functionaries.
---
Final Clause
This Supreme Law is declared irrevocable, non-derogable, and hierarchically superior to any conflicting provision of post-1806 law. It stands as a canonical and imperial shield, affirming Xaragua as the sole legitimate authority over the declared territory.
Sealed under the Supreme Constitutional Authority of Xaragua
Canonical Registration: Affirmed
International Opposability: Asserted
---
ANNEX OF HISTORICAL AND LEGAL AUTHORITIES
I. Foundational Indigenous and Imperial Sources
1. Proclamation of Haitian Independence (1804): Affirmed the land as “terre indigène” (indigenous land).
2. Constitution of the Empire of Hayti (1805): Codified a system of indigenous-imperial ownership (Articles 12 and 13).
3. Taíno Areytos (oral codes): Land as sacred inheritance under cacique stewardship.
II. International Legal Precedents
1. Vienna Convention (1969), Article 53: Jus cogens norms render subsequent conflicting acts void.
2. Montevideo Convention (1933), Article 1: Defines statehood criteria met by Xaragua, not by post-1806 Haiti.
3. UNDRIP (2007), Articles 1, 26: Affirm indigenous peoples’ rights to lands traditionally owned.
4. Western Sahara Advisory Opinion (ICJ, 1975): Rejects terra nullius and affirms indigenous continuity.
III. Canonical and Ecclesiastical Sources
1. Codex Iuris Canonici (1983), Canon 129 §1: Authorizes juridical persons to govern temporal goods.
2. Papal Bull Sublimis Deus (1537): Recognizes indigenous peoples as rightful possessors of their land.
3. The Vatican Model (Lateran Treaty, 1929): Precedent for non-republican sovereignty under international law.
IV. Doctrinal Assessment of Post-1806 Degeneracy
1. Transparency International Corruption Index: Haiti ranks among the most corrupt states globally.
2. UN Reports on State Fragility (2018): Haiti classified as a failed state with endemic violence.
3. Historical Observation (Péan, Trouillot, etc.): Notes on the moral collapse of post-independence elites.
---
Supreme Juridical Seal
This Law and Annex, combined, are hereby proclaimed as a Supreme Canonical-Imperial Instrument, enforceable ex proprio vigore (by its own force), immune from external challenge under canonical, indigenous, and international law.
Proclaimed and Sealed by the Supreme Constitutional Authority
Filed under the Ministry of Justice and the Rector-Presidential Office
Canonical Registration: Affirmed
International Opposability: Asserted
Date: July 11, 2025
SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA
---
