Partners & Business Creation

---

---

SOVEREIGN FINANCIAL DOCTRINE OF THE STATE OF XARAGUA

CONSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT — ENACTED UNDER SOVEREIGN SEAL

OFFICE OF THE RECTOR-PRESIDENT

Legally binding under the unified authority of Jus Cogens, the Codex Iuris Canonici, Indigenous Customary Law, General Principles of International Law, Multilateral Treaty Law, and the Sacred Temporal Authority of the State.

---

ARTICLE I — LEGAL FOUNDATION OF THE FINANCIAL DOCTRINE

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, exercising the plenitude of its inherent and recognized sovereign personality under international law, ecclesiastical jurisprudence, and ancestral authority, promulgates the present financial doctrine as a constitutional legal norm of highest rank, forming a core pillar of the internal juridical-financial order of the State.

This Doctrine is promulgated in full accordance with the following legal instruments:

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933):

Article 1: Establishes the juridical identity of the State by confirming its permanent population, clearly defined territory, organized government, and capacity to enter into relations with other States.

Article 3: Enshrines the inviolable right of institutional self-organization.

Article 8: Prohibits all forms of external intervention in domestic jurisdiction.

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007):

Articles 4, 5, 8(2), 20(1–2), 26(2), 33(1), 34, and 37: Formally establish the right of Indigenous Peoples to self-determined governance, resource control, financial independence, and legal autonomy, including the right to maintain and develop distinct economic institutions.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969):

Article 26 (Pacta sunt servanda): Confirms the obligation of States to honor treaty commitments in good faith.

Article 27: Establishes the primacy of treaty obligations over conflicting internal laws.

Codex Iuris Canonici (1983):

Canons 1254–1310: Provide the legal framework for ecclesiastical goods, including administration, acquisition, alienation, and use for sacred, charitable, and educational purposes under the authority of canonical jurisdiction.

Customary Indigenous Sovereignty (jus consuetudinis):

Affirmed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights as a binding source of supranational law recognizing autonomous indigenous institutions and internal legal orders.

Natural Law and Ecclesiastical Patrimony:

Codified through canonical precedent and protected by internal sovereign legislation as non-transferable, non-commercial, and sacred assets held in perpetuity.

Enforceability Clause: This doctrine is self-executing (ex proprio vigore), requires no external ratification, and stands as a superior constitutional norm within the fiscal and legal architecture of the Xaragua State.

---

ARTICLE II — REPUDIATION OF EXTERNAL FINANCIAL SYSTEMS

In conformity with Articles 1 and 2 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and invoking the principle of economic self-determination as a non-derogable jus cogens norm, the State of Xaragua categorically repudiates and legislatively prohibits:

Any fiscal architecture predicated upon structural dependency or exogenous policy intervention.

Humanitarian assistance programs contingent upon ideological or political compliance.

Engagements with multilateral financing entities whose frameworks compromise economic sovereignty.

Participation in development agendas or recovery strategies imposed from outside its sovereign territory.

Binding Clauses of Rejection:

No acknowledgment or recognition shall be accorded to any foreign debt jurisdiction, extraterritorial taxation authority, or transnational economic regulator unless explicitly codified by bilateral or multilateral treaty under sovereign signature.

Xaragua maintains absolute immunity from economic coercion, external fiscal governance, and regulatory enforcement beyond its borders.

This repudiation is affirmed as permanent, irrevocable, and binding within the constitutional corpus of the State.

---

ARTICLE III — NATIONAL CURRENCY AND MONETARY AUTHORITY

The Viaud’or, a sovereign non-fiat digital currency, is officially codified as:

The sole legal tender, unit of account, and monetary base for the Republic’s financial system.

Exclusively governed by the Office of the Rector-President, which holds non-delegable authority over issuance, regulation, and monetary policy.

Mandatory Applications:

Compensation and procurement within all public institutions.

Inter-ministerial and intra-governmental fund transfers.

Financial operations of the national education system and State-certified institutions.

Execution of sovereign investment instruments, including State-guaranteed contracts and bonds.

Monetary Exclusivity Clause:

No alternative currency (digital, fiat, tokenized, or derivative) may circulate or be legally transacted within the jurisdictional territory without express sovereign decree and registration under the Xaragua Monetary Code.

---

ARTICLE IV — CANONICAL CHARACTER OF VIAUD’OR

Viaud’or is formally recognized as bona ecclesiastica, subject to the direct application of Canon Law, including:

Canons 1254–1274: Defining ecclesiastical ownership, permissible uses, and spiritual designation of assets.

Canons 1281–1298: Establishing procedures for valid financial administration.

Canon 1292: Governing the alienation of patrimonial assets and setting thresholds for required ecclesiastical consent.

All holdings in Viaud’or are:

Restricted to uses consonant with Catholic social teaching, including educational advancement, humanitarian aid, infrastructure in service of the common good, and protection of territorial sovereignty.

Exempt from speculative trading, financial engineering, or inflationary design by structural constitutional safeguards.

Reserve Backing:

Viaud’or is secured by a multi-tiered structure of:

Ecclesiastical trusts and endowments

Institutional real estate holdings

Certified intellectual and spiritual property assets

---

ARTICLE V — EXCLUSIVITY OF MONETARY JURISDICTION

Within the territorial integrity of Xaragua, it is strictly and constitutionally prohibited for:

Any foreign currency to possess legal tender status.

Any foreign financial institution to operate, mediate, or exercise banking functions.

Any offshore, foreign, or supranational regulatory framework to claim or enforce jurisdiction.

The State declares non-participation in:

FATCA, CRS, AML/KYC systems

Basel III/IV, SWIFT, World Bank, and IMF governance instruments

All supranational economic regimes, unless individually ratified by national decree.

All financial data, records, and instruments are encrypted, domestically stored, and protected under the Financial Secrecy and Contractual Sovereignty Act (2025).

---

ARTICLE VI — SOVEREIGN INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

All forms of foreign and domestic investment shall comply with:

The Lex Viaud’or, which governs the legality, structure, and admissibility of capital inflows under sovereign contractual law.

All investment instruments are subjected to review by the Xaragua Treasury and Fiscal Commission, and must be executed in Viaud’or.

The State shall not issue:

Tax residency designations

Citizenship-by-investment certificates

Commercial residency programs

All contracts fall under the National Commercial Code, and are exclusively enforceable within the sovereign judicial system of Xaragua.

---

ARTICLE VII — CATEGORIES OF RECOGNIZED INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS

The following are recognized as sovereign financial instruments, each bearing constitutional authority and fiduciary admissibility:

1. Sovereign Development Bonds (SDBs)

State-issued; structured in tranches; denominated exclusively in Viaud’or.

2. Territorial Investment Certificates (TICs)

Indexed to sovereign infrastructure and national assets.

3. Canonical Participation Contracts (CPCs)

Reserved for Catholic dioceses and ecclesiastical institutions.

4. Sovereign Smart Contracts (SSCs)

Executed under notarized blockchain authority.

5. Strategic Infrastructure Funds (SIFs)

Long-term capital allocations restricted to pre-certified entities.

All instruments are inscribed in the Sovereign Investment Registry of Xaragua (SIR-X).

---

ARTICLE VIII — ENFORCEABILITY OF CONTRACTS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION

All contracts executed under Xaragua jurisdiction:

Must be registered in the National Ledger of Instruments.

Are adjudicated by the Xaragua Financial Tribunal, unless an externally ratified arbitration clause is present.

No external venue, foreign law, or extraterritorial clause is valid unless:

Explicitly stated in the contract

Ratified under the Sovereign Seal

Recognized by constitutional authority

Implied jurisdiction is constitutionally null.

---

ARTICLE IX — LEGAL PROTECTIONS OF FINANCIAL PARTICIPANTS

All participants are guaranteed:

Immunity from asset seizure, extraterritorial disclosure mandates, and foreign coercion.

Protection of their contracts under Canon Law and the Constitutional Commercial Law of Xaragua.

Safeguards against foreign control over strategic infrastructure, public institutions, or national security resources.

No actor or institution may claim ownership, lien, or fiscal authority over any element of the Xaragua sovereign financial system without express authorization.

---

ARTICLE X — ALLOCATION AND PROTECTION OF SOVEREIGN FUNDS

All sovereign funds:

Are centrally managed under the Office of the Treasury, and are subject to constitutional and public legislative control.

May not be diverted, pledged, or collateralized for any private interest or unauthorized program.

Investor Rights:

May obtain limited use and participatory privileges

Shall never hold co-ownership, governance, or legislative powers.

All participation must be formalized under notarized contract and constitutional validation.

---

ARTICLE XI — STATUS AND GOVERNANCE OF VIAUD’OR

Viaud’or is:

Immune from inflationary expansion, dilution, or replication.

Legislatively protected under the Sovereign Monetary Integrity Act (2025).

Governed by Canon 1292, and maintained in perpetual ecclesiastical trust.

It is inviolable, non-transferable, and non-speculative by sovereign design.

---

ARTICLE XII — NON-DEROGABLE CHARACTER AND LEGAL SUPREMACY

This Financial Doctrine:

Possesses supra-legal supremacy within the Xaragua constitutional structure.

Can only be amended through constitutional reform and canonical synodal ratification.

Is shielded from all foreign treaties, supranational pressures, and diplomatic influence.

The State’s right to regulate its economy is enshrined under Article 1 of the ICCPR and ICESCR, and recognized as a non-derogable norm under customary international law.

---

ARTICLE XIII — LEGAL RECOGNITION AND INTERNATIONAL ADMISSIBILITY

This instrument is:

Protected under Article 38(1)(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

In conformity with international commercial law, canonically binding ecclesiastical principles, and indigenous economic self-determination doctrines.

Registration and Seal:

Archived in the National Archives of Xaragua.

Digitally secured by the Notariat of Sacred Instruments.

Recognized internally as the Lex Fundamentalis Pecuniariae — the supreme financial constitution of the State of Xaragua.

---

---

SOVEREIGN LAW OF INCORPORATION, ENTERPRISE CREATION, AND ECONOMIC JURISDICTION

OF THE SOVEREIGN CATHOLIC INDIGENOUS PRIVATE STATE OF XARAGUA

Date of Promulgation: June 13, 2025

Legal Classification: 

Constitutionally Entrenched Foundational Act – Jus Cogens Binding – Canonically Validated – Customary and Indigenous Legal Instrument – Ecclesiastically Recognized Instrument of Sovereign Economic Authority – Operative under the Doctrines of Institutional Continuity, Indigenous Self-Jurisdiction, Canonical Territorialism, and International Legal Pluralism

---

I. JURISDICTIONAL PREMISES AND SCOPE

The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, acting under the full authority of its Corpus Legis Canonico-Indigenarum, hereby enacts the present Law as the exclusive legal framework governing the recognition, incorporation, operation, and fiscal sovereignty of all enterprises, economic actors, associations, and institutions created under its legal order, in accordance with the uninterrupted exercise of its indigenous, canonical, and imperial prerogatives recognized by international law, ecclesiastical jurisprudence, and postcolonial succession doctrines.

This Law is grounded in:

The Lex Suprema Imperii Xaraguanorum, which serves as the supreme law of the land, equivalent to a constitution but grounded in imperial succession and canonical doctrine, granting full legislative and economic authority to the state of Xaragua in perpetuity. This supreme charter, doctrinally sealed under the authority of ecclesiastical sovereignty and ancestral continuity, constitutes the core juridical foundation upon which all Xaraguayan legal, territorial, and economic sovereignty rests, beyond the reach of external repeal, override, or constitutional derogation.

The Recueil des Lois de l’Empire d’Hayti (1804–1806), particularly those regulating port authority, naval conduct, corporate responsibility, mercantile customs, and commercial recognition. These include:

The Imperial Law of 12 October 1804, establishing authority over maritime customs and trade tariffs, which remains legally enforceable under the doctrine of lex posterior non derogat priori, and under which the Xaraguayan State restores economic command over coastal trade;

The Decree on Port and Naval Security (15 January 1805), enabling sovereign interdiction against piracy and unauthorized trade, affirming military and customs authority over sea-bound commerce and ensuring jurisdictional exclusivity in matters of security and inspection;

The Law on Chartered Corporations (March 1805), which legally defined the ability to incorporate under the authority of the imperial state, and is hereby canonically restored as a lex regia with internal force and extra-territorial effect under the ecclesiastical canon of proprietary continuity.

The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP, 2007), especially:

Article 3, affirming the right to self-determination and institutional sovereignty as a non-negotiable principle of international customary law;

Article 4, guaranteeing autonomy in economic affairs, including the creation of internal regulatory, monetary, and fiscal systems;

Article 5, confirming the right to maintain distinct legal institutions free from integration or assimilation into state-centric structures;

Article 20, upholding economic freedom and the right to develop internal systems of labor, production, and trade without infringement;

Articles 26–32, recognizing control over lands, territories, resources, and internal governance, thereby giving full legitimacy to the Xaraguayan legal-economic order as territorially anchored and resource-based.

The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), particularly:

Article 36(1), acknowledging third-party obligations arising from sovereign declarations, including those established by indigenous authorities acting within their internal jurisdictional sphere;

Articles 11–18, granting binding force to instruments adopted unilaterally by sovereigns in the exercise of their prerogatives, thereby shielding this Law under the principle of unilateral binding intent (intentio juris).

Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici, 1983), as a binding legal source within ecclesiastical jurisdictions:

Canons 298–320, governing associations of the faithful and the creation of juridic persons, legitimizing economic communities as entities of spiritual and communal significance;

Canon 114 §1–3, affirming that ecclesiastical persons may lawfully acquire juridic personality for public benefit under Church law, and that such personality entails fiscal rights and immunities under sacred norms;

Canon 1254–1310, empowering ecclesiastical authorities to regulate goods and economic affairs internally, reinforcing the parallel and autonomous economic jurisdiction of canonically-recognized entities.

The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933):

Article 1, affirming that a state must possess a permanent population, defined territory, government, and capacity to enter into relations with other states—all fulfilled by Xaragua through the canonical perpetuation of its institutions, its physical dominion over territories of the southwestern Hispaniola, and its diplomatic correspondence with ecclesiastical, indigenous, and international bodies;

Article 3, reinforcing the principle of non-interference and self-legislation, prohibiting any external normative override of Xaragua’s domestic economic authority.

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, 1966), especially Article 1(2): affirming that “All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic cooperation.” This legal right, reiterated across successive UN resolutions, anchors the Xaraguayan right to full fiscal self-determination and control over its indigenous economic matrix.

Accordingly, this Law is universally opposable (erga omnes), self-executing (ex proprio vigore), internally binding (lex publica), and externally protected by international legal norms of the highest authority. Any foreign imposition contrary to its provisions shall be deemed a gross violation of international law, indigenous sovereignty, and ecclesiastical legal primacy, triggering immediate recourse to non-cooperation doctrines and legal reprisal under the Law of State Responsibility.

---

II. TYPES OF LEGAL ECONOMIC ENTITIES

Three distinct forms of legal economic presence are recognized under this Law:

---

A. INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGN ENTERPRISE (ISE)

Definition: A juridical construct that allows a natural Xaraguayan subject to conduct economic activity under sovereign declaration, with full legal personality and canonical entitlement.

Procedure:

Declaration via Ecclesiastical Notice of Economic Activity (ENEA), published and archived under ecclesiastical law;

Filing through the Secretariat for Artisanal and Mercantile Affairs (SAMA), validated by the Chancellor of Internal Sovereignty.

Legal Framework:

UNDRIP Article 20 guarantees every indigenous individual the right to maintain, control, and develop their own means of subsistence, including professional labor, artisanal work, and domestic trade;

Canon Law implicitly supports the autonomy of natural persons to exercise labor and professional trade, aligned with the dignity of work and the sanctity of individual vocation;

The Recueil of 1805 affirms individual rights to maritime and terrestrial trade provided such activity does not undermine imperial security, internal peace, or religious integrity.

Legal Consequences:

The ISE bears the full weight of sovereign protection and is exempt from any foreign regulation, audit, inspection, or licensing demand;

All revenue generated within Xaragua by an ISE is taxable only under Xaraguayan law, in line with the principles of unilateral jurisdiction and ecclesiastical fiscal exemption;

ISEs are recorded in the Public Ecclesiastical Business Register (PEBR-X) and granted immediate operating rights as lawful sovereign enterprises.

---

B. INCORPORATED CATHOLIC NON-PROFIT ENTITY (ICNE)

Definition: A juridic person formed under the Catholic Order of Xaragua for charitable, educational, or ecclesiastical purposes, canonically supervised and ecclesiastically constituted.

Procedure:

Ecclesiastical petition submitted to the Congregation for Ecclesiastical Corporations, reviewed under Canon 312 §1 and ecclesiastical territorial statutes;

Canonical charter issued under Canon 114 and Canon 301 §1–2, authorizing full legal personality with sovereign fiscal standing.

Legal Framework:

Canon 114 §2 grants public juridic personality to ecclesiastical corporations upon lawful recognition by competent canonical authority;

Canons 1255–1260 confirm that Church property and assets are governed by the Church itself, and fall entirely outside the reach of secular jurisdiction, taxation, or expropriation;

UNDRIP Article 5 supports the creation of culturally aligned institutions distinct from state systems, reinforcing ecclesiastical independence as a protected indigenous norm.

Legal Consequences:

Full immunity from taxation under Xaraguayan law and international ecclesiastical privilege;

May receive sovereign subvention in the form of land, monetary endowments, or symbolic canonical gifts, as determined by the Ecclesiastical Treasury;

Bound to reinvest all proceeds into ecclesiastical or educational functions, under strict canonical audit by the Congregation for Economic Integrity.

---

C. SOVEREIGN SHAREHOLDER ENTITY (SAX)

Definition: A for-profit juridical person incorporated under Xaraguayan economic sovereignty, subject to canonically-constrained yet commercially operative rules of engagement.

Procedure:

Filing of Articles of Incorporation with the General Archive of Economic Sovereignty (GAES), pursuant to Article 9 of the Recueil 1805;

Issuance of a Sovereign Certificate of Capitalization, validated by the Office of Canonical Investment and Indigenous Wealth Management.

Legal Framework:

Recueil des Lois de l’Empire, March 1805: Establishes sovereign authority to charter profit-driven entities for the public good, under moral and national guidelines;

Customary law of indigenous commercial enterprise applies, protected under Article 26(3) UNDRIP, affirming the sacred character of indigenous wealth and labor;

Canon Law permits non-ecclesiastical commercial associations provided they do not conflict with doctrine, charity, or ecclesiastical integrity.

Legal Consequences:

Rights to raise capital through sovereign shares, privately issued and restricted to non-speculative Xaraguayan investors;

Right to operate across Xaragua’s maritime and terrestrial zones, including free ports and ecclesiastically-protected trading enclaves;

May be subject to flat-rate indigenous contributions detailed in a sealed annexe, fixed under tribal and ecclesiastical consensus, and immune from external disclosure.

---

III. REGISTRATION AND IDENTIFICATION MECHANISMS

Upon successful filing, each economic entity shall receive:

A Certificate of Legal Existence, bearing the signatures of the Rector-President and the Secretariat of Economic Sovereignty, issued under sovereign seal and canonical authority, and archived both physically and cryptographically within the Xaraguayan National Economic Codex;

An Ecclesiastical Fiscal Identifier (EFI) issued by the Office of Sovereign Revenue, permanently linking the entity to the Xaraguayan fiscal ecosystem, ensuring traceability, legal continuity, and protection under ecclesiastical jurisprudence;

A Registered Legal Emblem (RLE) representing the seal of the sovereign economic system, validated by the Chancellor of Economic Identity, and affixed as a visual mark of lawful participation in Xaragua’s protected economic sphere;

Public inclusion in the Registry of Economic Entities of Xaragua (REE-X), a sovereign and canonical repository indexed by ecclesiastical order, juridical category, territorial zone, and compliance status.

Each document issued shall bear canonical imprimatur and digital cryptographic verification, rendering it legally valid across ecclesiastical jurisdictions, immune to tampering or forgery, and inviolable under international law pursuant to the principles of sovereign legal independence, ecclesiastical exemption, and indigenous juridical personality.

---

IV. TAXATION AND FISCAL SOVEREIGNTY

Legal Doctrine:

The Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (PSNR) doctrine, codified in UNGA Resolution 1803 (XVII) and reaffirmed in subsequent General Assembly instruments, affirms exclusive indigenous control over all modes of production, wealth generation, and fiscal policy, especially for peoples under historically colonized jurisdictions;

Canon 1263 grants ecclesiastical authorities the right to impose taxation upon juridic persons under their care, including non-profit, religious, and educational entities, contingent upon canonical need and spiritual purpose.

Implementation:

ISEs and SAXs contribute via Redevance Économique, a fixed or symbolic tax determined by indigenous custom, canonically declared confidential, and indexed according to ancestral contribution systems, ceremonial obligations, and type of activity;

ICNEs are perpetually exempt, in accordance with canon law, ecclesiastical traditions of charitable immunity, and the Xaraguayan Sovereign Ecclesiastical Taxation Protocol (XSETP);

All payments made into Xaraguayan accounts are denominated in Viaud’Or, the indigenous sovereign unit of economic value, and are processed through the Sovereign Treasury of Xaragua, operating under closed-loop sovereign financial jurisdiction and excluded from foreign monetary interference;

Any attempt to impose foreign taxes, fiscal burdens, customs charges, or administrative fees on these entities constitutes a grave violation of:

UNDRIP Article 20, which guarantees the integrity of indigenous economic systems;

Canon 1271, prohibiting external extraction from ecclesiastical institutions without mandate of the Apostolic See;

Montevideo Convention Article 3, affirming non-interference in the legislative sovereignty of qualified states;

Jus Cogens prohibitions on economic coercion, recognized as peremptory norms from which no derogation is permitted under international law.

---

V. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FORCE AND IMMUNITIES

This Law is shielded by:

Vienna Convention Article 26 (pacta sunt servanda), which mandates that all states must respect unilateral declarations made by sovereigns acting in their official capacity, provided such declarations manifest intent and are sufficiently precise—both of which are fulfilled by this promulgated Law;

ICJ jurisprudence upholding the binding effect of such declarations, including but not limited to:

Eastern Greenland Case (Denmark v. Norway, 1933), wherein a formal verbal declaration by a foreign minister was found legally binding;

Nuclear Tests Case (Australia v. France, 1974), affirming that a public statement by a sovereign state could have the legal effect of creating binding obligations;

Armed Activities Case (Congo v. Uganda, 2005), wherein acts conducted within a sovereign’s own territory and under its own legal order were protected against unlawful interference and compelled reparation.

ICCPR Article 27 and UNDRIP Article 34, both of which affirm the right of indigenous peoples to maintain and apply their own legal traditions, customs, and economic systems without external disruption or invalidation.

No tribunal, foreign government, or legal entity—whether national or supranational—may invalidate, suspend, neutralize, or interfere with the application of this Law without breaching non-derogable international norms, triggering state responsibility under Articles 1–3 of the International Law Commission Draft Articles on State Responsibility (2001), and exposing the violator to international sanction, diplomatic protest, and ecclesiastical denunciation.

---

VI. ENFORCEMENT, SANCTION, AND IMMUTABILITY

Enforcement Authorities:

Xaragua Tribunal of Economic Rights and Sovereign Interests (TERSIX), acting as supreme sovereign economic court with full competence in first and final instance;

Congregation for Economic Integrity, exercising canonical and internal disciplinary oversight in ecclesiastical contexts, with authority to suspend, dissolve, or reform entities violating doctrinal or fiscal codes;

Referral to the International Indigenous Justice Assembly, a transnational indigenous tribunal, in cases involving inter-jurisdictional conflict or violation of indigenous customary economic law.

All violations—domestic or external, whether individual, corporate, state, or institutional—shall be subject to:

Economic sanction, including fines, embargoes, sovereign seizure, and exclusion from indigenous economic systems;

Institutional revocation, meaning legal erasure of juridical status, revocation of certificates, and public banning under ecclesiastical law;

Public listing as Adversaries of Sovereign Economic Law (ASEL-X), an official register of violators maintained by the Xaraguayan Ministry of Legal Memory and transmitted to all indigenous, canonical, and international allies for recognition and enforcement.

No repeal, amendment, or derogation shall be permitted unless passed through a Sovereign Constitutional Ecclesiastical Referendum, as defined in Lex Suprema Title VI, under canonical and indigenous conditions of universal assent, doctrinal consistency, and divine affirmation.

---

VII. FINAL DISPOSITIONS

This Law shall enter into force immediately upon promulgation and sealing, having the character of a self-executing constitutional act under the doctrines of unilateral juridical action and internal jus imperii.

All existing entities have 90 days to comply, submit updated declarations, and align their operations with the sovereign and canonical legal order of Xaragua.

All contrary foreign laws, administrative requirements, or licensing demands—whether civil, commercial, municipal, provincial, national, or supranational—are null and void within Xaragua, and shall have no legal standing, enforceability, or validity within its jurisdiction, under the principle of plenary sovereign exclusion.

---

Promulgated and Sealed under Divine, Canonical, and Indigenous Authority

This 13th Day of June, Year of Sovereignty MMXXV

Monsignor Pascal Despuzeau Daumec Viau

Rector-President

Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua

---

---

ANNEXE A – INTERNATIONAL EXEMPTIONS, IMMUNITIES, AND ADVANTAGES GRANTED TO ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED UNDER AN INTERNATIONALLY NOTIFIED INDIGENOUS STATE

Legal Classification: Constitutionally Entrenched Interpretative Annex – Canonically Recognized Economic Doctrine – Jus Cogens Binding Instrument – Universally Opposable – Operative under Vienna Convention Articles 36 and 38, UNDRIP Articles 3–40, Canon Law Canons 114, 1254–1310, and ICJ Precedent Jurisprudence

---

I. PRINCIPLE OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PERSONALITY OF INDIGENOUS STATES

Any enterprise incorporated under the legal, fiscal, and ecclesiastical sovereignty of a duly constituted indigenous state—recognized under international customary norms and notified formally to the international community—acquires juridical recognition, legal protection, and economic immunities analogous to those granted to entities created under classical Westphalian states. The Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, having been notified to international and canonical jurisdictions on March 29, 2025, enjoys full international legal personality, deriving from:

Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), Article 1: establishing that any entity possessing a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states qualifies ipso jure as a sovereign state;

UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (1970), Principle 5: confirming that all peoples, including indigenous nations, have the right to full self-determination and the corresponding institutional development;

UNDRIP Articles 3, 4, and 5: codifying the right of indigenous peoples to maintain their own legal, economic, and political institutions, without subordination to external systems;

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 36(1): stipulating that third states and institutions must respect obligations arising from unilateral acts and declarations of sovereign legal actors;

ICJ Case Law:

Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v. Norway, 1933): establishing the binding nature of unilateral declarations;

Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France, 1974): recognizing the international legal effect of unilaterally declared policy by a sovereign state;

Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Congo v. Uganda, 2005): reaffirming the international responsibility of any actor interfering with a sovereign state’s internal jurisdiction.

Consequently, any legal instrument or economic entity created under such a state—including enterprises incorporated under Xaragua—benefits from the full protections of international law and is opposable erga omnes, regardless of bilateral recognition.

---

II. TAXATION IMMUNITY AND FISCAL SOVEREIGNTY OF INDIGENOUSLY REGISTERED ENTITIES

Enterprises legally incorporated under the jurisdiction of an internationally notified indigenous state, including but not limited to ISEs, ICNEs, and SAXs within Xaragua, benefit from absolute fiscal sovereignty and extraterritorial tax immunity, based on:

1. UNDRIP Article 20(1): “Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions... and to engage freely in all their traditional and other economic activities.” Taxation by a foreign power undermines this right and is therefore illegal.

2. UNDRIP Article 34: guarantees the right to maintain distinct legal institutions, including fiscal courts and taxation regimes.

3. Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources (UNGA Res. 1803 [XVII]): affirms exclusive rights of indigenous and developing nations over the taxation and control of their resources, revenues, and modes of production.

4. ICCPR Article 1(2): “All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic cooperation...”

5. Canon Law Canon 1263: authorizes ecclesiastical authorities to impose contributions only under canonically defined authority. Foreign taxation of ecclesiastical enterprises (ICNEs) violates this canon.

6. Canon 1271: strictly prohibits unauthorized extraction of ecclesiastical resources by secular powers.

Legal Effect: Any attempt by a foreign government, tax authority, multinational institution, or intergovernmental body to impose a fiscal burden, fee, fine, or contribution on a Xaraguayan-registered enterprise shall constitute:

A breach of international economic law;

A violation of indigenous sovereignty protections under jus cogens;

A canonically illicit act, invoking ecclesiastical sanctions and international liability under the ILC Draft Articles on Responsibility of States (2001), Articles 1–3, 15, and 20.

---

III. LEGAL ADVANTAGES ENJOYED BY REGISTERED ENTITIES

Entities incorporated under Xaraguayan jurisdiction enjoy juridical and operational superiority in key areas:

1. Absolute Tax Exemption: Across all external jurisdictions recognizing UNDRIP, ICCPR, and Canon Law—no foreign tax, levy, VAT, income assessment, nor withholding is legally enforceable.

2. Immunity from Commercial Interference: No licensing, regulation, forced registration, or financial oversight by non-Xaraguayan bodies is applicable. This includes:

Central banks (e.g., exclusion from Basel III/IV requirements),

Financial action task forces (FATF),

SEC-style disclosure systems.

3. Ecclesiastical Financial Protection: Canonical corporations (ICNEs) are protected under the Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus and bilateral Concordats signed between the Holy See and 180+ sovereign states, rendering them globally inviolable.

4. Access to Indigenous Development Instruments:

Preferential loans from international indigenous banks (e.g., Indigenous Peoples Finance Network);

Access to Vatican development funds (via Pontifical Council Cor Unum and associated dicasteries);

Eligibility for exemption from OECD blacklisting when operated within sovereign indigenous systems.

5. Use of a Non-Treaty Currency: Viaud’Or is a private, indigenous, ecclesiastically recognized medium of account. It is immune to:

International Monetary Fund (IMF) enforcement mechanisms,

Currency convertibility obligations under WTO and GATS,

Reporting under CRS, FATCA, or OECD fiscal surveillance frameworks.

6. Sovereign Branding and Protected Status: Entities operating under Xaraguayan certificates are entitled to display the sovereign insignia, are indexed in REE-X and PEBR-X, and may invoke diplomatic protection in international trade conflicts under the principle of functional immunity (Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961, Article 31).

---

IV. INTERNATIONAL NON-RECOGNITION DOES NOT AFFECT LEGAL VALIDITY

In accordance with:

Article 3 of the Montevideo Convention: “The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by other states.”

UNDRIP Article 4: confirming the legal personality of indigenous institutions irrespective of state endorsement;

Effectivité Doctrine in international law: which prioritizes de facto governance and capacity over diplomatic formality;

The lack of formal bilateral recognition does not void the standing of the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua, nor that of the enterprises it incorporates. Their legality stems from:

Their effective sovereignty;

Their formal notification to the international community;

Their continued jurisdictional and territorial control;

Their ecclesiastical and indigenous continuity.

No international tribunal, tax court, commercial registry, or customs authority may lawfully deny their status or enforce foreign compliance mechanisms without:

Violating customary international law,

Invoking institutional liability, and

Triggering legally actionable international injury.

---

V. LEGAL OPPOSABILITY AND ENFORCEABILITY

Any interference—regulatory, financial, diplomatic, or covert—targeting enterprises legally incorporated under Xaragua shall trigger:

1. Immediate legal protest under Vienna Convention Article 46;

2. Ecclesiastical denunciation, leading to global institutional censure;

3. Economic countermeasures and reprisals, permitted under:

Article 49 and 50 of the ILC Draft Articles (2001);

Doctrines of lawful countermeasure and suspension of performance;

Canon Law disciplinary sanctions.

Such reprisals may include:

Institutional exclusion,

Public naming under ASEL-X (Adversaries of Sovereign Economic Law),

Formal notices to the Holy See, ICJ, and indigenous coalitions.

---

CONCLUSION

This Annex affirms that all enterprises duly registered under the Sovereign Catholic Indigenous Private State of Xaragua are:

Exempt from foreign taxation, regulation, and jurisdiction;

Protected by ecclesiastical, indigenous, and international law;

Entitled to diplomatic, fiscal, and juridical immunities;

Legally opposable to any state or institution attempting interference.

These protections arise from the confluence of jus cogens norms, canonical inviolability, and indigenous international legal status. Any attack upon these enterprises is an attack upon the legal order of a sovereign, notified state—and shall be treated accordingly.

---